Notebookcheck Logo

华为Mate X3评测--拥有强大摄像头的超薄可折叠智能手机

没有讨价还价。

随着Mate X3的推出，华为提供了其最新的可折叠。这个概念已经被完全修改，可折叠显示屏现在也被移到了里面。此外，还有大量的存储空间，快速的SoC，以及令人信服的相机设置。然而，由于已知的局限性，它只推荐给极少数人。
Android Foldable Smartphone Touchscreen

Mate X3是华为最新的可折叠智能手机，它的后继者是 Mate Xs 2并首次不再依赖外部面板，而是将可折叠屏幕转移到内部，就像竞争对手的情况一样。

华为的智能手机依靠高档次的功能，但它的价格并不便宜，为2199欧元（约4000美元）。在下面的评论中了解关于Mate X3的一切。

Huawei Mate X3
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) Waipio
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 730
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5
Display
7.85 inch 10.10:9, 2496 x 2224 pixel 426 PPI, Capacitive, OLED, 1 - 120 Hz LTPO-OLED, 1440 Hz PWM-Dimming; Cover display: 6.4 inches, 2504 x 1080, 1 - 120 Hz LTPO-OLED, 1440 Hz PWM-Dimming, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 512 GB 
, 490.33 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, Card Reader: NanoMemory-Card (up to 256 GB, FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, altimeter, color spectrum, OTG, IR-Blaster
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 5.3 x 156.9 x 141.5
Battery
4800 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, 23 mm) + 12 MPix (5x optical zoom, f/3.4, 125 mm) + 13 MPix (Ultrawide, f/2.2, 13 mm); Camera2-API: Full
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.4)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: Onscreen, USB-Cabel, SIM-Tool, transparent case, 66W-Charger, EMUI 13.1, 24 Months Warranty, DRM Widevine L1, GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1, E5a), BeiDou (B1, B1C, B2a), QZSS (L1, L5), NavIC (L5), fanless, waterproof
Weight
239 g
Price
2199 Euro
Links
Huawei homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
86.3 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2023
Huawei Mate X3
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730		239 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash7.85"2496x2224
89.8 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2022
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730		263 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash7.60"2176x1812
87.2 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
Honor Magic Vs
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730		261 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash7.90"2272x1984
86.9 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2022
Vivo X Fold
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730		311 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash8.03"2160x1916
86.3 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2022
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730		262 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash8.02"2160x1914
Mate X3的使用说明在一开始就有。
Mate X3的使用说明在一开始就有。

华为Mate X3有黑色和深绿色两种颜色。与所有前辈不同的是，可折叠显示屏不再在外面，而是移到了里面，同时在外面集成了一个额外的面板，这样Mate X3在折叠时也可以使用。它具有非常纤细的设计，也是比较领域中最轻的可折叠式。即使在折叠时，它看起来也不会太厚（高x宽x深：156.9 x 72.4 x 11.08毫米）。突出的相机驼峰在视觉上取悦了我们，至少在折叠时，Mate X3不会来回晃动。

建造质量令人信服。缝隙很紧，非常均匀。仔细的扭转尝试并不影响可折叠性，也没有引起任何吱吱作响。虽然外面使用了昆仑玻璃，但我们已经从P60 Pro中知道了这一点。 P60 Pro可折叠面板受到保护膜的保护，该保护膜不能被移除，由几层组成。其中一层是由一种非牛顿的液体材料制成的，据说可以将抗冲击性提高四倍。华为在设置智能手机时显示了相应的操作说明（见截图）。

铰链再次被重新加工，不仅更加耐用，而且还能使Mate X3的折叠式显示屏在130°角内持续保持稳定的位置。此外，这款手机符合IPX8防水标准，因此可以防止完全和永久浸泡在淡水中。Mate X3没有幸免于典型的折叠式，但折叠时边缘平齐，没有留下难看的缝隙。

尺寸比较

❌
162 mm 142 mm 14.6 mm 311 g156.5 mm 139.9 mm 11.1 mm 255 g161.6 mm 144.7 mm 5.4 mm 262 g160.3 mm 141.5 mm 6.1 mm 261 g156.9 mm 141.5 mm 5.3 mm 239 g155.1 mm 130.1 mm 6.3 mm 263 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

设备 - Mate X3与512GB加存储卡

华为的Mate X3提供512GB的内部存储空间，还可以选择用NanoMemory Card进行扩展，该卡可容纳256GB。

USB 3.2（Gen. 1）端口支持有线图像输出，包括桌面模式，以及OTG。在测试中，数据传输呈现出非常快的速度，达到391.13MB/s。

此外，还配备了红外辐射器、NFC和蓝牙5.2。

顶部：麦克风、扬声器、红外辐射器
顶部：麦克风、扬声器、红外辐射器
左边：卡槽
左边：卡槽
右边：音量、电源/指纹
右边：音量、电源/指纹
底部：话筒、USB、扬声器、麦克风
底部：话筒、USB、扬声器、麦克风

记忆卡阅读器

Mate X3不能使用microSD卡，而是使用华为自己的NanoMemory卡，其容量可以达到256GB。

读卡器的速度真的很快，几乎完全使用标准的可能性（最大90MB/s）。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Huawei NanoMemory)
73.64 MB/s
Huawei Mate Xs 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Huawei NanoMemory)
35.51 MB/s -52%
Sony Xperia 1 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
18.35 MB/s -75%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170Tooltip
Huawei Mate X3 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Huawei NanoMemory: Ø49.7 (22.6-59.2)
Sony Xperia 1 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø28.3 (19.6-31.9)
Huawei Mate X3 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Huawei NanoMemory: Ø61.2 (8.2-66)
Sony Xperia 1 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø45.7 (28.7-176.3)

软件--Mate X3也仍然不得不放弃谷歌服务

华为Mate X3在欧洲搭载了EMUI 13.1，它基于Android 12。亚洲市场使用的是Harmony OS 3.1，在外观和结构上没有区别。华为没有提供关于更新供应的详细信息，但在过去一直都很好。在测试时，安全补丁已于2023年4月1日更新，因此不再是最新的。

与过去几年一样，Mate X3仍然不得不放弃谷歌服务和相应的应用程序。华为自己的AppGallery包含许多知名的应用程序，但缺少像Meta、Netflix和迪士尼这样的美国主要供应商。许多这些应用程序可以通过其他平台使用花瓣搜索来下载和安装，但这并不容易，特别是对于不太精通技术的用户来说。一个更好的选择可以是GBox，它很容易安装，并提供Play Store和大多数谷歌服务。然而，这可能会导致电池消耗增加，而且在数据保护方面也并非无害。

华为AppGallery
应用程序也可以通过花瓣搜索来安装。

通信和GNSS - 华为折叠机没有6GHz WLAN

与其前任一样，华为不允许在Mate X3中整合5G移动通信。相应地，最多只能使用LTE，但它有广泛的频率覆盖。

华为的智能手机与我们的参考路由器华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000相结合，实现了快速和稳定的传输速率。然而，它不支持Wi-Fi 6E或Wi-Fi 7，因此没有6GHz WLAN。华为承诺使用VHT160，它应该允许在5GHz网络中的数据传输率超过1GBit/s而没有问题。然而，Mate X3在测试中并没有达到这些。

Networking
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
928 (min: 851) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
934 (min: 888) MBit/s ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
882 (min: 836) MBit/s ∼67%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
913 (min: 455) MBit/s ∼62%
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1315 (min: 1162) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1467 (min: 1101) MBit/s ∼100%
Vivo X Fold
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
923 (min: 715) MBit/s ∼70%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
887 (min: 845) MBit/s ∼60%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
808 (min: 737) MBit/s ∼61%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
915 (min: 858) MBit/s ∼62%
Huawei Mate Xs 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
653 (min: 585) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
844 (min: 415) MBit/s ∼58%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 receive AXE11000
711 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
725 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼49%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950Tooltip
Huawei Mate X3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø927 (851-952)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø881 (836-927)
Huawei Mate X3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø934 (888-965)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø898 (455-948)
GPS测试：在大楼里
在建筑中
GPS测试：户外
在户外

华为Mate X3拥有广泛的GNSS支持和集成的气压计，拥有最好的先决条件来引导其主人安全地通过未知的地形。即使在室内，Satfix也是非常快速和准确的。

在一次短途骑行中，这款折叠式必须面对与Garmin Venu 2的比较。X3记录的10公里左右的路线短了90米，但海拔高度表几乎是一样的。看一下详细的路线就会发现，华为的智能手机对路线的记录很好，但有时会有点偏离轨道。

全球卫星导航系统的试驾：环湖航行
全球卫星导航系统的试驾：环湖航行
全球导航卫星系统试运行：转折点
全球导航卫星系统试运行：转折点
全球导航卫星系统试运行：摘要
全球导航卫星系统试运行：摘要

电话功能和语音质量

华为的Mate X3支持VoLTE和WLAN通话等功能，但SIP账户控制并没有实现在系统中。只要有一个插槽没有被可选的存储卡占据，它最多可以使用两张nano-SIM卡。折叠式手机没有eSIM。

握在耳边时，语音质量非常好，即使是更大的环境噪音也能被可靠地过滤掉。扬声器也很好，但有一点回响。

相机 - Mate X3拥有强大的三摄像头

与Mate X3的自拍（盖板上的光学元件）。
与Mate X3的自拍（盖板上的光学元件）。
与Mate X3自拍（可折叠显示屏中的光学元件）
与Mate X3自拍（可折叠显示屏中的光学元件）

Mate X3的每块显示屏都有自己的800万像素摄像头，都有一个f/2.4光圈，可以进行体面的自拍。视频最多可以录制成超高清，但小显示屏上的光学器件仅限于30 FPS，而可折叠面板上的光学器件尽管分辨率相同，但也能达到60 FPS。

如果你喜欢，你也可以将主摄像头设置作为前置摄像头。你所要做的就是在应用程序中按下一个按钮，然后额外的显示屏就可以作为取景器。但特别是对于传统的摄影，华为Mate X3可以充分展示其优势，在白天也能拍出好照片。低光照的照片效果也不错，但有点太红了。超广角镜头可以更强调轮廓，镜头的弧度在边缘变得相当明显，但它在其他方面做得很好，对微距主题也很负责。潜望镜光学系统允许五倍的光学放大率，包括光学图像稳定（OIS），这是其他可折叠智能手机所不具备的。从数字上看，甚至可以达到50倍的放大率。

视频可以用30或60FPS的超高清记录。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra wide-angle5x ZoomLow-Light
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
11.5 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
16 ∆E
19.9 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
7 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
2 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei Mate X3: 10.21 ∆E min: 1.95 - max: 19.86 ∆E
ColorChecker
10.4 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
11 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei Mate X3: 10.9 ∆E min: 3.57 - max: 17.16 ∆E

配件和保修 - 华为手机带66瓦的电源适配器

华为Mate X3在德国有24个月的保修期。它配备了一个透明的保护壳，与摄像头一起夹在背面。还包括一个66瓦的模块化电源，以及一条配套的USB线（Type-A到Type-C），一个额外的盖板显示屏保护膜，和一个SIM卡工具。

输入和操作 - 到目前为止，M-Pen 2s只针对中国。

在测试中，华为Mate X3的两个电容式触摸屏都能非常可靠地工作。然而，盖板显示屏的表面明显更滑，对手指的阻力更小。与Galaxy Z Fold4一样，华为的折叠式也支持主显示屏的主动笔输入，但必要的华为M-Pen 2s目前只在亚洲有售.然而，它可以通过AliExpress进口。(148欧元)。

电源键上的指纹传感器可用于生物识别安全。它有非常好的识别率，并能快速解锁X3。脸部识别可以额外使用或替代使用，但其安全性较低。

X3再次能够进行手指触摸输入，支持许多手势，甚至还有一个高级模式，可以用来调整显示尺寸和控制触摸屏的打字时间，以及其他一些事情。

显示屏 - 更加明亮，更容易看清

子像素结构（主显示屏）
子像素结构（主显示屏）
子像素结构（外部显示）
子像素结构（外部显示）

华为Mate X3的主显示屏现在在内部，并最小化地增长到7.85英寸。它支持HLG、HDR10和HDR10+等HDR标准。LTPO OLED面板的刷新率高达120赫兹，系统可在1至120赫兹之间动态调整，或者可以将刷新率固定为60或120赫兹。

与Mate Xs 2相比，其亮度得到了改善。 Mate Xs 2现在，当环境光传感器激活时，平均达到969cd/m2。即使在亮区和暗区均匀分布的情况下（APL18），这一数值也保持在同一水平，即使在HDR渲染中，亮度也不会进一步增加。那些喜欢手动调节亮度的人有476cd/m2可供他们使用。

外面较小的盖板显示屏也依靠OLED技术，但它可以变得更亮。虽然在手动模式下亮度几乎相同（最大479 cd/m2），但在APL18测试中，较小的面板可以增加一点，达到1,239 cd/m2。

两台显示器的OLED闪烁非常相似。我们测量到一个相当稳定的90赫兹，取决于变焦水平，这可能是一个烧毁保护或黑框插入。将镜头拉近，我们可以测量到在最低显示亮度下，频率在425到549赫兹之间。Mate X3的两个显示屏都使用了1,440赫兹的PWM调光，这被认为对眼睛比较容易。

1) Foldable Display (X-Rite i1Pro 3) 2) Cover Display (X-Rite i1Pro 3)
978
cd/m²		948
cd/m²		946
cd/m²
997
cd/m²		948
cd/m²		966
cd/m²
1010
cd/m²		957
cd/m²		974
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with Foldable Display (X-Rite i1Pro 3)
Maximum: 1010 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 969.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.24 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 948 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.15
1161
cd/m²		1163
cd/m²		1140
cd/m²
1169
cd/m²		1160
cd/m²		1163
cd/m²
1164
cd/m²		1163
cd/m²		1196
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with Cover Display (X-Rite i1Pro 3)
Maximum: 1196 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1164.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.99 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 1160 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.16
Huawei Mate X3
OLED, 2496x2224, 7.9"		Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Dynamic AMOLED, 2176x1812, 7.6"		Honor Magic Vs
OLED, 2272x1984, 7.9"		Vivo X Fold
AMOLED, 2160x1916, 8"		Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
OLED, 2160x1914, 8"		Huawei Mate Xs 2
OLED, 2480x2220, 7.8"
Screen
-9%
-58%
-12%
-14%
-70%
Brightness middle
948
913
-4%
803
-15%
730
-23%
1015
7%
763
-20%
Brightness
969
929
-4%
809
-17%
724
-25%
1022
5%
769
-21%
Brightness Distribution
94
96
2%
97
3%
95
1%
98
4%
95
1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.4
1.7
-21%
2.27
-62%
1.66
-19%
1.6
-14%
2.8
-100%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.6
3.6
-38%
5.99
-130%
2.92
-12%
3.4
-31%
5.9
-127%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.7
1.5
12%
3.9
-129%
1.6
6%
2.6
-53%
4.3
-153%
Gamma
2.15 102%
2.16 102%
2.25 98%
2.28 96%
2.22 99%
2.24 98%
CCT
6539 99%
6515 100%
6234 104%
6395 102%
6506 100%
6457 101%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 484 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 484 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 484 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8702 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最小显示亮度
分钟。
25 %显示亮度
25 %
50 % 显示亮度
50 %
75 %显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

具有固定变焦水平和不同亮度设置的测量系列

用Calman进行的分析表明，华为Mate X3的两块显示屏都经过了良好的校准和匹配。

灰度（室外显示，颜色模式：正常, 色温：标准, 目标色彩空间: sRGB)
灰度（室外显示，颜色模式：正常, 色温：标准, 目标色彩空间: sRGB)
颜色（室外显示，颜色模式：正常, 色温：标准, 目标色彩空间: sRGB)
颜色（室外显示，颜色模式：正常, 色温：标准, 目标色彩空间: sRGB)
色彩空间（室外显示，色彩模式：正常，色温：标准, 目标色彩空间: sRGB)
色彩空间（室外显示，色彩模式：正常，色温：标准, 目标色彩空间: sRGB)
饱和度（室外显示，颜色模式：正常, 色温：标准, 目标色彩空间: sRGB)
饱和度（室外显示，颜色模式：正常, 色温：标准, 目标色彩空间: sRGB)
灰度（可折叠显示，颜色模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB)
灰度（可折叠显示，颜色模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB)
颜色（可折叠显示，颜色模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB)
颜色（可折叠显示，颜色模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB)
色彩空间（可折叠显示，色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB)
色彩空间（可折叠显示，色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB)
饱和度（可折叠显示，颜色模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB)
饱和度（可折叠显示，颜色模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB)

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.711 ms rise
↘ 0.6495 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.64 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.8385 ms rise
↘ 0.802 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

在户外，即使在阳光下，Mate X3仍然很容易阅读，环境光传感器总是快速调整亮度。

在色彩表现方面，可折叠显示屏的视角稳定性仍然要好一些，因为盖板显示屏在平视角度下显示的画面略微偏暖。然而，这在日常使用中并不妨碍。

室外（可折叠显示）
室外（户外展示）
视角稳定（可折叠显示屏）
视角稳定性（户外显示）

性能--Mate X3依靠的是骁龙8+ Gen 1

华为Mate X3搭载的是 骁龙8+ Gen 1在4G版本中，可以使用12GB的LPDDR5工作内存。因此，该SoC不是最先进的，但它仍然非常快，也被许多对手使用。

基准测试在预期范围内，证明了华为智能手机的高性能。尽管再次提供了性能模式，但我们没有使用它。差异不是太大，但该选项在热量发展方面特别明显。

Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.3 | Antutu v9 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1334 Points +3%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1324 Points +2%
Huawei Mate X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1292 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (897 - 1389, n=25)
1281 Points -1%
Vivo X Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1232 Points -5%
Huawei Mate Xs 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192
1107 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=177, last 2 years)
1045 Points -19%
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
897 Points -31%
Multi-Core
Huawei Mate X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4320 Points
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4237 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (3782 - 4436, n=25)
4167 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4065 Points -6%
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3782 Points -12%
Vivo X Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3600 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=177, last 2 years)
3488 Points -19%
Huawei Mate Xs 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192
3334 Points -23%
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Huawei Mate X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1806 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (1530 - 1854, n=7)
1735 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=175, last 2 years)
1500 Points -17%
Multi-Core
Huawei Mate X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4656 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (4140 - 4761, n=7)
4493 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=175, last 2 years)
4205 Points -10%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1057225 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (782013 - 1119358, n=23)
997431 Points +1%
Huawei Mate X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
985150 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
973843 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 2056989, n=104, last 2 years)
810694 Points -18%
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
782013 Points -21%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (11029 - 20841, n=24)
15090 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13983 Points +11%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13195 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 27169, n=199, last 2 years)
13195 Points +5%
Huawei Mate X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12606 Points
Vivo X Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12100 Points -4%
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
11296 Points -10%
Huawei Mate Xs 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192
11230 Points -11%
CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1178 Points +5%
Huawei Mate X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1117 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (749 - 1178, n=23)
1033 Points -8%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
975 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2674, n=167, last 2 years)
925 Points -17%
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
911 Points -18%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7858 Points +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (5642 - 8753, n=23)
7450 Points +3%
Huawei Mate X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7236 Points
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7003 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 12993, n=161, last 2 years)
6467 Points -11%
Huawei Mate Xs 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192
5722 Points -21%
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
5642 Points -22%
System
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12839 Points +4%
Huawei Mate X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12326 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (8750 - 13563, n=23)
11726 Points -5%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
11275 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 17953, n=161, last 2 years)
10321 Points -16%
Huawei Mate Xs 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192
10078 Points -18%
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
8750 Points -29%
Memory
Huawei Mate X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
8846 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7782 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (3871 - 9114, n=23)
7492 Points -15%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7342 Points -17%
Huawei Mate Xs 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192
7081 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 18911, n=161, last 2 years)
7017 Points -21%
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3871 Points -56%
Graphics
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
23174 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (16194 - 26660, n=23)
21146 Points +1%
Huawei Mate X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
20974 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
19283 Points -8%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
18021 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=161, last 2 years)
17962 Points -14%
Huawei Mate Xs 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192
15539 Points -26%
Web
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1982 Points +65%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (1198 - 2006, n=23)
1699 Points +42%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1612 Points +35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=161, last 2 years)
1572 Points +31%
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1291 Points +8%
Huawei Mate X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1198 Points
Huawei Mate Xs 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192
967 Points -19%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
84787 Points
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
73962 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (3291 - 84787, n=21)
43831 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=152, last 2 years)
17753 Points
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
8502 Points
AImark - Score v3.x
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (887 - 147801, n=11)
37778 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=145, last 2 years)
24985 Points
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1201 Points
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1001 Points

图形计算由集成的 Adreno 730这是2022年Android 智能手机的最快GPU。Mate X3在基准测试中提供了令人信服的性能，并能经常将自己置于比较领域的顶端。因此，对于游戏和其他图形密集型的应用程序来说，有足够的性能。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2766 Points 0%
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2757 Points
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2735 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2726 Points -1%
Vivo X Fold
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2496 Points -9%
Huawei Mate Xs 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1449 Points -47%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2821 Points
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2799 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2795 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2778 Points -2%
Vivo X Fold
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2585 Points -8%
Huawei Mate Xs 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1494 Points -47%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11098 Points +1%
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11041 Points
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11022 Points 0%
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10893 Points -1%
Huawei Mate Xs 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5666 Points -49%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7433 Points
Huawei Mate Xs 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5717 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6030 Points
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5847 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5099 Points -15%
Huawei Mate Xs 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1751 Points -71%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20851 Points +1%
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20549 Points
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20220 Points -2%
Huawei Mate Xs 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11207 Points -45%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13386 Points
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13077 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12161 Points -9%
Huawei Mate Xs 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5094 Points -62%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +35%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +34%
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps
Huawei Mate Xs 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -33%
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -33%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
434 fps
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
419 fps -3%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
381 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
298 fps -31%
Huawei Mate Xs 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
262 fps -40%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
118 fps +33%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
111 fps +25%
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -33%
Huawei Mate Xs 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps -45%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
238 fps +7%
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
222 fps
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
211 fps -5%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
179 fps -19%
Huawei Mate Xs 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
73 fps -67%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79 fps +13%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
74 fps +6%
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
70 fps
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -14%
Huawei Mate Xs 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19 fps -73%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
146 fps +12%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
145 fps +12%
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
130 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
115 fps -12%
Huawei Mate Xs 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76 fps -42%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76 fps +85%
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
55 fps +34%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43 fps +5%
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
41 fps
Huawei Mate Xs 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
17 fps -59%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
103 fps
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
94 fps -9%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
83 fps -19%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77 fps -25%
Huawei Mate Xs 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps -39%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78 fps +152%
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
45 fps +45%
Vivo X Fold
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps +26%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps +3%
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps
Huawei Mate Xs 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps -35%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
50 fps
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
41 fps -18%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps -20%
Vivo X Fold
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps -22%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps -22%
Huawei Mate Xs 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
27 fps -46%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
97 fps +90%
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps +16%
Vivo X Fold
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps +12%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51 fps 0%
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51 fps
Huawei Mate Xs 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps -41%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
138 fps
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps -13%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
106 fps -23%
Vivo X Fold
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 fps -28%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps -35%
Huawei Mate Xs 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
72 fps -48%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps -13%
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19 fps -17%
Vivo X Fold
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18 fps -22%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18 fps -22%
Huawei Mate Xs 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13 fps -43%
Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 4 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G (Chrome 105)
152.211 Points +47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (76.2 - 204, n=23)
125.2 Points +21%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=171, last 2 years)
125.2 Points +21%
Honor Magic Vs (Chrome 111)
111.449 Points +8%
Huawei Mate X3 (Huawei Browser 13.0.4)
103.364 Points
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 (MiUI-Browser 14.7)
76.341 Points -26%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=153, last 2 years)
143.5 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (69.1 - 196, n=18)
119.6 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G (Chrome 105)
116 runs/min
Honor Magic Vs (Chome 111)
99.4 runs/min
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G (Chrome 105)
131 Points +35%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=161, last 2 years)
117.9 Points +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (69 - 159, n=21)
113.9 Points +17%
Huawei Mate X3 (Huawei Browser 13.0.4)
97 Points
Honor Magic Vs (Chrome 111)
81 Points -16%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Points -100%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G (Chrome 105)
174 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (106 - 224, n=14)
159.4 Points
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=80, last 2 years)
149.9 Points
Honor Magic Vs (Chrome 111)
123 Points
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G (Chrome 105)
52642 Points +4%
Huawei Mate X3 (Huawei Browser 13.0.4)
50732 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (17622 - 61536, n=24)
42193 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=213, last 2 years)
38624 Points -24%
Honor Magic Vs (Chrome 111)
36606 Points -28%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 (MiUI-Browser 14.7)
29168 Points -43%
Huawei Mate Xs 2 (Huawei Browser 12.1)
26010 Points -49%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 (MiUI-Browser 14.7)
1530.8 ms * -74%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=169, last 2 years)
1515 ms * -72%
Honor Magic Vs (Chrome 111)
1055.4 ms * -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (665 - 1707, n=22)
1023 ms * -16%
Huawei Mate X3 (Huawei Browser 13.0.4)
880.8 ms *
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G (Chrome 105)
799.9 ms * +9%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei Mate X3Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5GHonor Magic VsVivo X FoldXiaomi Mix Fold 2Huawei Mate Xs 2Average 512 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-10%
-15%
-5%
11%
-23%
-11%
-8%
Sequential Read 256KB
1953.41
1854.98
-5%
1695.2
-13%
1850.6
-5%
1882.11
-4%
1850.72
-5%
1846 ?(1023 - 2023, n=27)
-5%
1893 ?(226 - 4512, n=200, last 2 years)
-3%
Sequential Write 256KB
1479.42
1251.57
-15%
1296.5
-12%
1405
-5%
1783.27
21%
739.83
-50%
1199 ?(575 - 1876, n=27)
-19%
1478 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=200, last 2 years)
0%
Random Read 4KB
261.78
321.87
23%
270.2
3%
293.4
12%
342.67
31%
260.49
0%
282 ?(208 - 386, n=27)
8%
278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=200, last 2 years)
6%
Random Write 4KB
466.74
265.9
-43%
300.1
-36%
358.1
-23%
446.48
-4%
301.38
-35%
338 ?(221 - 532, n=27)
-28%
312 ?(9.4 - 753, n=200, last 2 years)
-33%

排放 - 可折叠，有双扬声器

温度

华为Mate X3的表面即使在持续的负载下也能保持大面积的冷却，尽管在这个测试中已经使用了苛刻的Burnout基准测试。

不幸的是，该SoC的性能稳定性同样很弱。虽然在3DMark Wild Life压力测试的前六次运行中基本保持稳定，但随后急剧下降，因此只有40%的原始性能仍然可用。

Max. Load
 41.6 °C41.2 °C38.6 °C 
 36.4 °C39.2 °C35.8 °C 
 33.5 °C33.6 °C32.9 °C 
Maximum: 41.6 °C
Average: 37 °C
36.8 °C40.8 °C39.6 °C
33 °C40.8 °C40.8 °C
30.8 °C31.9 °C32.2 °C
Maximum: 40.8 °C
Average: 36.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  33.1 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
70.3 % +73%
Huawei Mate Xs 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
55.9 % +37%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53.6 % +32%
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40.7 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95.2 % +117%
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69.6 % +59%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62.3 % +42%
Huawei Mate Xs 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58.1 % +32%
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43.9 %
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Huawei Mate X3 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø11 (7.4-16.9)
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø6.91 (5.45-9.37)
Huawei Mate X3 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø44 (26.1-64.2)
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø24.1 (19.8-35.5)

演讲者

华为Mate X3的两个扬声器在中等音量下提供了令人愉快的音质，但在最大音量下，中音和低音大约过于单薄。

USB端口可用于连接耳机和外部扬声器到智能手机。蓝牙5.2可以无线使用，支持音频编解码器SBC、AAC、LDAC和L2HC。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.935.92526.225.83129.421.84028.724.55036.633.1632220.38019.719.110017.927.512518.53916017.75620015.154.725015.555.931516.554.44001356.250013.465.863014.2678001367.8100012.868.2125013.870.2160013.773.2200013.675.5250013.275.531501474.7400013.578.6500013.678.8630013.976.4800013.671.11000013.6711250013.863.91600013.147.3SPL25.886.5N0.765.6median 13.7median 67.8Delta0.89.1433830.431.923.226.223.322.436.436.324.125.320.32617.63215.742.313.853.516.255.415.156.312.65913.159.513.165.812.766.214.768.413.470.312.870.912.875.812.87513.275.113.774.813.978.813.177.913.978.613.378.21470.814.265.813.659.425.687.40.770.4median 13.6median 70.30.98hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei Mate X3Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei Mate X3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 打开状态下运行时间短

消耗功率

功耗测量已经表明，尽管有LTPO，Mate X3的可折叠显示屏还是相当耗能的。负载下相对较高的功耗是由Burnout基准测试造成的。

4,800毫安时的电池通过电缆充电可达66瓦，在测试中花了不到50分钟。最高50瓦的无线充电是可能的，而且X3还可以处理反向无线充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.15 / 0.38 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.81 / 4.26 / 4.45 Watt
Load midlight 10.11 / 11.58 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei Mate X3
4800 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
4400 mAh		Honor Magic Vs
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
4500 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
48%
20%
43%
32%
34%
Idle Minimum *
0.81
0.89
-10%
1.3
-60%
0.97
-20%
1.006 ?(0.56 - 2.57, n=21)
-24%
0.883 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=161, last 2 years)
-9%
Idle Average *
4.26
0.96
77%
1.7
60%
1.37
68%
1.834 ?(0.71 - 8.65, n=21)
57%
1.467 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=161, last 2 years)
66%
Idle Maximum *
4.45
1.13
75%
2
55%
1.48
67%
1.984 ?(0.79 - 8.71, n=21)
55%
1.621 ?(0.83 - 4.46, n=161, last 2 years)
64%
Load Average *
10.11
4.32
57%
7
31%
3.98
61%
5.68 ?(2.75 - 15, n=21)
44%
6.58 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=155, last 2 years)
35%
Load Maximum *
11.58
6.56
43%
10.1
13%
6.83
41%
8.44 ?(4.54 - 15, n=21)
27%
9.91 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=155, last 2 years)
14%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Huawei Mate X3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.97 (0.686-11.5)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.41 (1.113-10.7)
Huawei Mate X3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.823 (0.639-1.038)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.92 (0.845-1.504)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112Tooltip
Huawei Mate X3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.1 (8.14-11.6)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.73 (3.87-12.7)
Huawei Mate X3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.823 (0.639-1.038)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.92 (0.845-1.504)

电池寿命

我们首先测试了可折叠主显示屏和动态刷新率下的电池运行时间。在调整显示亮度（150cd/m²）的WLAN测试中，运行时间很短，不到8小时。如果你只使用盖板显示屏，可以达到约10.5小时。这比较多，但不是一个特别好的结果。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Huawei Browser 13.0.4)
7h 56min
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Huawei Mate X3
4800 mAh
476 min
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
4400 mAh
663 min
Honor Magic Vs
5000 mAh
756 min
Vivo X Fold
4600 mAh
698 min
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
4500 mAh
567 min
Huawei Mate Xs 2
4600 mAh
454 min

Pros

+ 纤细的树形，重量轻
+ 良好的相机设置
+ 明亮而准确的显示
+ 1,440赫兹的PWM调光
+ 大量的存储空间
+ 防水（IPX8）

Cons

- 既没有5G也没有6GHz的WLAN
- 没有谷歌服务（GMS）
- 不支持eSIM
- 电池运行时间较短

结论 - 有吸引力的可折叠式，不仅缺乏GMS

在审查中：华为Mate X3。测试设备由德国华为提供。
在审查中：华为Mate X3。测试设备由德国华为提供。

华为的Mate X3在技术上是一款不错的可折叠智能手机，它能以明亮而准确的显示屏说服人，还能提供1440Hz的PWM调光。此外，华为提供了充足的内存，一个红外发射器，一个可选的内存扩展，以及一个非常好的相机设置，但其良好的整体评级因色彩管理而降低。

华为Mate X3仍将是一款奇特的设备。不仅仅是谷歌服务的缺失造成的，尤其是高价格和电池运行时间的疲软。

尽管价格很高，但买家将不得不忍受一些削减：除了5G，不支持6GHz无线局域网，没有谷歌服务，不支持eSIM，特别是电池运行时间相对较短。此外，还有一个不确定的更新时间表。这是一个遗憾，因为Mate X3是迄今为止最薄、最轻的可折叠手机，并能在许多其他方面说服人。

强大的替代品首先是 Galaxy Z Fold4但也有 Honor 神奇的Vs.

价格和可用性

Mate X3可以直接从华为商店以2199欧元的价格购买，但也可以从数码港或MediaMarkt购买。.

Huawei Mate X3 - 06/20/2023 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
88%
Keyboard
68 / 75 → 91%
Pointing Device
90%
Connectivity
68 / 70 → 97%
Weight
87%
Battery
79%
Display
93%
Games Performance
62 / 64 → 97%
Application Performance
94 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
90%
Noise
100%
Audio
77 / 90 → 86%
Camera
77%
Average
83%
86%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

More articles related to this device

Huawei Mate X3 (Mate X3 Series)

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 华为Mate X3评测--拥有强大摄像头的超薄可折叠智能手机
Daniel Schmidt, 2023-06-25 (Update: 2024-08-15)