Notebookcheck Logo

摩托罗拉Moto E20智能手机评测--蜂窝状设计的轻量级手机

廉价的动力棒。

摩托罗拉的Moto E20以不到100欧元的价格提供了良好的性能和低重量。另一方面，你必须在电池寿命等方面做出让步。这款廉价的智能手机真的值得吗？
Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen
摩托罗拉Moto E20
Motorola Moto E20 (Moto E Series)
Processor
Unisoc T7200 8 x 1.6 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G57 MP2
Memory
2048 MB 
Display
6.50 inch 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixel 270 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 25 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, proximity
Networking
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM, UMTS, LTE, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.5 x 164.8 x 75.5
Battery
4000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/​2.2, phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @1080p/​30fps (Camera 1); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, depth of field (Camera 2)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/​2.2, Videos @1080p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, Keyboard: virtual keyboard, charger, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps, FM radio, IP52-certified, fanless
Weight
184 g
Price
100 Euro
Links
Motorola homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors in comparison

Bewertung
Datum
Modell
Gewicht
Laufwerk
Groesse
Aufloesung
Preis ab
74.9 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2021
Motorola Moto E20
T7200, Mali-G57 MP2		184 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
76.3 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2021
Nokia G10
Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320		197 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
73.2 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2021
Motorola Moto E7i Power
SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322		200 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
75.3 %
v7 (old)
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT
Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320		194 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.53"1600x720

箱子和设备 - 做工精良的塑料

摩托罗拉今年对其Moto G系列进行了相当程度的扩展，但Moto E系列的入门级手机仍有空间。此前，我们曾对 Moto E40配备了90赫兹的屏幕，今天我们将看看Moto E20，它的售价不到100欧元。

在这个价位上很难期待比塑料机身更多的东西，但摩托罗拉至少创造了某种质量，背部和边框之间几乎无缝过渡。Moto E20采用哑光处理和浅色蜂巢图案，设计相当别致。海岸蓝和石墨灰是可用的颜色选择。这款智能手机相对较薄，只有8.5毫米，184克的重量也明显比这个价格范围内的其他手机轻。

SD卡读卡器在写入速度方面并不是最快的，但在读取方面做得比较好。

摩托罗拉Moto E20
摩托罗拉Moto E20
摩托罗拉Moto E20
摩托罗拉Moto E20
摩托罗拉Moto E20

Size comparison

❌
164.9 mm 76 mm 9.2 mm 197 g165 mm 76 mm 9 mm 200 g165 mm 77 mm 9 mm 194 g164.8 mm 75.5 mm 8.5 mm 184 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.7 - 77, n=77, last 2 years)
29.2 MB/s +104%
Motorola Moto E20
  (Angelbird V60)
14.29 MB/s

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Motorola Moto E20 Mali-G57 MP2, T7200, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø21.5 (8.36-35.8)
Nokia G10 PowerVR GE8320, Helio G25, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø29.3 (21.8-38.1)
Motorola Moto E7i Power GE8322 / IMG8322, SC9863A, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø35.1 (24.3-48.4)
Motorola Moto E20 Mali-G57 MP2, T7200, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø75.7 (45.7-80)
Nokia G10 PowerVR GE8320, Helio G25, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø59.1 (31.5-63.8)
Motorola Moto E7i Power GE8322 / IMG8322, SC9863A, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø69.3 (42.3-77.4)

通信、软件和操作 - 快速Wi-Fi，但没有NFC

你必须使用Wi-Fi 4，但Moto E20设法从旧的Wi-Fi标准提供体面的传输速率。因此，最大可能的互联网速度是这个价格范围内其他智能手机的两倍。然而，缺乏NFC是一个不利因素，这意味着用户失去了使用移动支付服务的能力。

纯粹的，预装了股票Android ，但在测试时，安全补丁是2021年8月的，因此已经过时了。由于价格低廉，你不应该期望有太多的安全更新。

背面有一个物理指纹传感器。它的工作有轻微的延迟，但总体上能可靠地解锁智能手机。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Motorola Moto E20
802.11 b/g/n
95.9 (86min - 101max) MBit/s
Nokia G10
802.11 b/g/n
47.6 (21min - 67max) MBit/s -50%
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT
802.11 b/g/n
46.4 (21min - 78max) MBit/s -52%
Motorola Moto E7i Power
802.11 b/g/n
44.7 (32min - 59max) MBit/s -53%
iperf3 receive AX12
Motorola Moto E20
802.11 b/g/n
80.1 (45min - 94max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT
802.11 b/g/n
52.6 (24min - 74max) MBit/s -34%
Nokia G10
802.11 b/g/n
52.1 (30min - 72max) MBit/s -35%
Motorola Moto E7i Power
802.11 b/g/n
48.5 (44min - 54max) MBit/s -39%
0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Motorola Moto E20; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø80.1 (45-94)
Motorola Moto E20; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø95.9 (86-101)

照相机 - 锐度和细节低

摩托罗拉Moto E20
摩托罗拉Moto E20

在智能手机的背面有两个相机镜头和一个LED闪光灯，但其中只有一个可以真正用于拍照。Moto E20的主摄像头的分辨率为1300万像素，第一眼看去能拍出不错的照片，但在细节上有些冲淡了。

此外，相机的亮度不高，所以明亮的地方被掩盖了，而黑暗的地方则不那么详细。在我们的照片测试中，在1勒克斯的照度下看不到细节。

Moto E20录制的视频最大分辨率为1080p，每秒30帧。曝光调整得相当快，但自动对焦总是需要一秒钟，直到它适应新的情况，然后迅速作出反应，不需要长时间的对焦搜索。

500万像素的前置摄像头可以为家庭使用拍摄体面的自拍照，但你不应该放大太多，因为细节处理相当平庸。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera PflanzeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera Low Light
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
13.1 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
8 ∆E
9 ∆E
5 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
8 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto E20: 9.24 ∆E min: 4.22 - max: 13.44 ∆E
ColorChecker
29 ∆E
54.4 ∆E
39.3 ∆E
39.2 ∆E
43.8 ∆E
65.5 ∆E
54.3 ∆E
34 ∆E
42.4 ∆E
26.2 ∆E
67.4 ∆E
65.2 ∆E
29.5 ∆E
48.8 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
77.9 ∆E
42.1 ∆E
45.9 ∆E
89.9 ∆E
70.1 ∆E
51.7 ∆E
36.8 ∆E
24.3 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto E20: 46.98 ∆E min: 13.52 - max: 89.9 ∆E

显示器 - 平均亮度

子像素矩阵
子像素矩阵

1,600 x 720的显示屏在分辨率和亮度方面与该级别的其他手机相当。相比之下，显示屏亮度明显高于 摩托E7i Power.黑色水平也很好；因此，对比度很好，颜色看起来更生动一些。

我们在很低的亮度下测量PWM，这种屏幕闪烁可能会给一些人带来问题。如果你在使用过程中喜欢不那么明亮的屏幕，你应该在购买之前仔细看看这个屏幕。

355
cd/m²		365
cd/m²		390
cd/m²
353
cd/m²		403
cd/m²		367
cd/m²
359
cd/m²		409
cd/m²		365
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 409 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 374 cd/m² Minimum: 4.43 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 403 cd/m²
Contrast: 1612:1 (Black: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.31 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26
Motorola Moto E20
IPS, 1600x720, 6.5"		Nokia G10
IPS, 1600x720, 6.5"		Motorola Moto E7i Power
IPS, 1600x720, 6.5"		Xiaomi Redmi 9AT
IPS LCD , 1600x720, 6.5"
Response Times
9034%
4510%
11%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
60 ?(31, 29)
66 ?(37, 29)
-10%
58 ?(29, 29)
3%
55 ?(31, 24)
8%
Response Time Black / White *
42 ?(25, 17)
38 ?(21, 17)
10%
32 ?(17, 15)
24%
36 ?(19, 17)
14%
PWM Frequency
367.6 ?(5)
100000
27103%
50000
13502%
Screen
22%
-4%
-21%
Brightness middle
403
485
20%
324
-20%
374
-7%
Brightness
374
458
22%
314
-16%
345
-8%
Brightness Distribution
86
89
3%
92
7%
85
-1%
Black Level *
0.25
0.2
20%
0.2
20%
0.46
-84%
Contrast
1612
2425
50%
1620
0%
813
-50%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.31
3.61
16%
4.62
-7%
3.86
10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.11
8.32
-17%
7.57
-6%
8.07
-14%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.2
2.1
60%
5.6
-8%
5.7
-10%
Gamma
2.26 97%
2.195 100%
2.482 89%
2.307 95%
CCT
7895 82%
6850 95%
7524 86%
6932 94%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
4528% / 2480%
2253% / 1227%
-5% / -14%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 25 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
60 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 31 ms rise
↘ 29 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 367.6 Hz ≤ 5 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 367.6 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 5 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 367.6 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN 颜色精度
CalMAN 颜色精度
CalMAN 颜色空间
CalMAN 颜色空间
CalMAN饱和度
CalMAN饱和度

性能、排放和电池寿命 - 入门级手机，功率很大

该 Unisoc Tiger T606已经是一个两年前的SoC。像诺基亚G10 ，稍微昂贵的竞争者被证明是相当强大的。当然，这款廉价的手机无法跟上中端甚至高端智能手机的步伐，但它足以在日常使用中流畅地浏览菜单和简单应用。

即使经过较长时间的负载，暖气也很难察觉。扬声器的声音很大，但似乎听起来很薄。也就是说，高音几乎没有过度强调的情况。aptX高清编解码器可用于蓝牙连接。

4000毫安时的电池容量似乎有点低，这在电池运行时间上很明显--在我们的Wi-Fi测试中，14:27小时还可以，但类似价格的竞争对手持续时间更长。然而，你不必每天都适度使用电源。小型电源适配器最多可提供10瓦，这意味着充电可能需要近2小时。

Geekbench 5.5 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E20
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP2, 2048
273 Points
Nokia G10
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
151 Points -45%
Motorola Moto E7i Power
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
131 Points -52%
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
132 Points -52%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (273 - 313, n=19)
306 Points +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=174, last 2 years)
1012 Points +271%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E20
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP2, 2048
708 Points
Nokia G10
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
809 Points +14%
Motorola Moto E7i Power
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
472 Points -33%
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
466 Points -34%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (708 - 1324, n=19)
1206 Points +70%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=174, last 2 years)
3370 Points +376%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E20
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP2, 2048
7155 Points
Nokia G10
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
5405 Points -24%
Motorola Moto E7i Power
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
4436 Points -38%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (6637 - 8303, n=19)
7338 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 26863, n=192, last 2 years)
13052 Points +82%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E20
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP2, 2048
1440 Points
Nokia G10
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
907 Points -37%
Motorola Moto E7i Power
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
738 Points -49%
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
808 Points -44%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (1414 - 1508, n=6)
1468 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)
11109 Points +671%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E20
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP2, 2048
1285 Points
Nokia G10
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
844 Points -34%
Motorola Moto E7i Power
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
672 Points -48%
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
774 Points -40%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (1255 - 1343, n=6)
1305 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)
19708 Points +1434%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E20
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP2, 2048
2489 Points
Nokia G10
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1231 Points -51%
Motorola Moto E7i Power
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
1124 Points -55%
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
987 Points -60%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (2489 - 2673, n=6)
2604 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)
5001 Points +101%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E20
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP2, 2048
963 Points
Nokia G10
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
468 Points -51%
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
413 Points -57%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (361 - 974, n=18)
910 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 17553, n=72, last 2 years)
3088 Points +221%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E20
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP2, 2048
823 Points
Nokia G10
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
398 Points -52%
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
354 Points -57%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (290 - 829, n=18)
772 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 29890, n=72, last 2 years)
3272 Points +298%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E20
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP2, 2048
2389 Points
Nokia G10
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1206 Points -50%
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1125 Points -53%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (2379 - 2577, n=18)
2499 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 7180, n=72, last 2 years)
3285 Points +38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E20
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP2, 2048
969 Points
Nokia G10
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
528 Points -46%
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
456 Points -53%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (959 - 989, n=18)
975 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 22303, n=161, last 2 years)
7911 Points +716%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E20
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP2, 2048
825 Points
Nokia G10
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
454 Points -45%
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
409 Points -50%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (814 - 834, n=18)
825 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33560, n=161, last 2 years)
11758 Points +1325%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E20
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP2, 2048
2484 Points
Nokia G10
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1227 Points -51%
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
956 Points -62%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (2484 - 2697, n=18)
2625 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (877 - 10259, n=161, last 2 years)
4659 Points +88%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
Points
Average Unisoc T7200
  (394 - 432, n=18)
416 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (408 - 13896, n=110, last 2 years)
2853 Points
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
Points
Average Unisoc T7200
  (392 - 424, n=18)
413 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (413 - 21065, n=182, last 2 years)
7652 Points
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E20
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP2, 2048
9.6 fps
Nokia G10
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
7.4 fps -23%
Motorola Moto E7i Power
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
5.8 fps -40%
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
7.9 fps -18%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (5.1 - 11, n=18)
8.83 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 247, n=203, last 2 years)
51.4 fps +435%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E20
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP2, 2048
5.2 fps
Nokia G10
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4 fps -23%
Motorola Moto E7i Power
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
3.3 fps -37%
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
3.6 fps -31%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (1.9 - 5.5, n=18)
5.22 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 263, n=203, last 2 years)
81.6 fps +1469%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E20
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP2, 2048
6.1 fps
Nokia G10
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4.7 fps -23%
Motorola Moto E7i Power
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
3.5 fps -43%
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4.6 fps -25%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (0.85 - 7.3, n=18)
5.34 fps -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 144, n=203, last 2 years)
38.3 fps +528%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E20
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP2, 2048
1.9 fps
Nokia G10
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1.4 fps -26%
Motorola Moto E7i Power
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
1.2 fps -37%
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1.4 fps -26%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (0.85 - 2.1, n=18)
1.925 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 112, n=203, last 2 years)
32.9 fps +1632%
Motorola Moto E20Nokia G10Motorola Moto E7i PowerXiaomi Redmi 9ATAverage 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-25%
-51%
-25%
-29%
646%
Sequential Read 256KB
263.2
245.6
-7%
90.5
-66%
266.4
1%
242 ?(25.8 - 452, n=247)
-8%
1863 ?(226 - 4512, n=194, last 2 years)
608%
Sequential Write 256KB
105.4
120
14%
117
11%
84.2
-20%
100.5 ?(14.8 - 196, n=247)
-5%
1446 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=194, last 2 years)
1272%
Random Read 4KB
72.3
43.6
-40%
28.6
-60%
46.49
-36%
43.2 ?(3.59 - 117.2, n=247)
-40%
278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=194, last 2 years)
285%
Random Write 4KB
59.8
20
-67%
7.6
-87%
33.53
-44%
22.4 ?(0.75 - 91, n=247)
-63%
309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=194, last 2 years)
417%

温度

Max. Load
 35.7 °C32 °C32.6 °C 
 35.6 °C31.7 °C33.1 °C 
 35.2 °C32.4 °C32.8 °C 
Maximum: 35.7 °C
Average: 33.5 °C
31.8 °C32.6 °C36.3 °C
31.4 °C31.7 °C36.3 °C
30.6 °C32.2 °C35.5 °C
Maximum: 36.3 °C
Average: 33.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  36.9 °C | Room Temperature 21.3 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.7 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.2 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.


热力图前线
热力图前线
热图背面
热图背面

扬声器

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.947.42544.744.7313436.74036.837.55042.6426337.336.28026.229.210028.327.712522.424.716018.928.42001633.225014.53931513.246.64001355.150016.56463019.569.580019.672.8100017.473.7125015.374.2160015.374.4200015.773.7250016.569.8315017.971.4400020.876.850002277.5630020.977800021.774.91000022.871.2125002266.31600022.564.4SPL31.586N1.464.4median 18.9median 69.8Delta312.24347.636.841.236.832.230.631.13436.12929.125.521.829.320.523.915.914.218.811.326.911.737.59.743.69.349.411.855.813.754.617.357.416.259.811.161.810.366.610.466.111.665.212.666.813.966.115.27215.668.216.363.716.564.316.466.817.151.260.268.865.971.426.478.112.522.219.226.50.838median 13.9median 59.8median 42.5median 49median 13.6median 583.514.123.422.512.820hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Moto E20Xiaomi Redmi 9AT
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Moto E20 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 36.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi 9AT audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 75% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命

Motorola Moto E20
4000 mAh		Nokia G10
5050 mAh		Motorola Moto E7i Power
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi 9AT
5000 mAh		Average of class Smartphone
 
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
867
1068
23%
1125
30%
1145
32%
985 ?(476 - 3244, n=204, last 2 years)
14%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
14h 27min

Pros

+ 相对更强大的
+ 在这个价格范围内的快速Wi-Fi
+ 重量低
+ 做工尚可

Cons

- 无NFC
- 亮度很低的PWM
- 相机清晰度和细节都很低
- 声音平淡
- 电池寿命相对较短

结论--重量轻，运行时间短

在审查中。摩托罗拉Moto E20。
在审查中。摩托罗拉Moto E20。

摩托罗拉Moto E20用很少的钱提供了很大的能量，重量较轻，并具有过时但快速的WLAN。如果这些方面很重要，那么这款廉价的设备可能会引起你的兴趣。

尽管如此，购买者应该知道，他们不能期望以低于100欧元的价格获得锐利的相机照片、非常明亮的屏幕或快速存储。Moto E20并不提供所有这些，所以它更适合那些偶尔使用智能手机，完全不需要某些功能或只需要非常少的用户。大多数入门级手机都是这样的。

与竞争对手相比，摩托罗拉不得不用较短的运行时间来换取手机的低重量，但在我们的WLAN测试中，14:27小时的运行时间仍足以满足日常使用。

摩托罗拉的Moto E20是一款快速、轻便、非常实惠的智能手机，但电池运行时间略短。

如果耐力比纯粹的性能和重量更重要，你应该看看 小米红米9AT.如果你想用很少的钱买一个90赫兹的屏幕，那么 摩托罗拉Moto E40是一个更合适的选择。

价格和可用性

你可以直接从制造商那里获得摩托罗拉Moto E20https://www.motorola.de/smartphones-moto-e-20/p.在测试的时候，互联网零售商已经有一些优惠，如亚马逊（美国）。.

Motorola Moto E20 - 12/06/2021 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
80%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
87%
Connectivity
39 / 70 → 55%
Weight
89%
Battery
90%
Display
84%
Games Performance
9 / 64 → 15%
Application Performance
64 / 86 → 75%
Temperature
94%
Noise
100%
Audio
62 / 90 → 69%
Camera
42%
Average
70%
75%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 摩托罗拉Moto E20智能手机评测--蜂窝状设计的轻量级手机
Florian Schmitt, 2021-12-10 (Update: 2021-12-10)