摩托罗拉Moto E20智能手机评测--蜂窝状设计的轻量级手机
Possible competitors in comparison
Bewertung | Datum | Modell | Gewicht | Laufwerk | Groesse | Aufloesung | Preis ab |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
74.9 % | 12/2021 | Motorola Moto E20 T606, Mali-G57 MP2 | 184 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
76.3 % | 07/2021 | Nokia G10 Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320 | 197 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
73.2 % | 09/2021 | Motorola Moto E7i Power SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322 | 200 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
75.3 % | Xiaomi Redmi 9AT Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320 | 194 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.53" | 1600x720 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
箱子和设备 - 做工精良的塑料
摩托罗拉今年对其Moto G系列进行了相当程度的扩展,但Moto E系列的入门级手机仍有空间。此前,我们曾对 Moto E40配备了90赫兹的屏幕,今天我们将看看Moto E20,它的售价不到100欧元。
在这个价位上很难期待比塑料机身更多的东西,但摩托罗拉至少创造了某种质量,背部和边框之间几乎无缝过渡。Moto E20采用哑光处理和浅色蜂巢图案,设计相当别致。海岸蓝和石墨灰是可用的颜色选择。这款智能手机相对较薄,只有8.5毫米,184克的重量也明显比这个价格范围内的其他手机轻。
SD卡读卡器在写入速度方面并不是最快的,但在读取方面做得比较好。
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Average of class Smartphone (7.7 - 77, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Moto E20 (Angelbird V60) |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信、软件和操作 - 快速Wi-Fi,但没有NFC
你必须使用Wi-Fi 4,但Moto E20设法从旧的Wi-Fi标准提供体面的传输速率。因此,最大可能的互联网速度是这个价格范围内其他智能手机的两倍。然而,缺乏NFC是一个不利因素,这意味着用户失去了使用移动支付服务的能力。
纯粹的,预装了股票Android ,但在测试时,安全补丁是2021年8月的,因此已经过时了。由于价格低廉,你不应该期望有太多的安全更新。
背面有一个物理指纹传感器。它的工作有轻微的延迟,但总体上能可靠地解锁智能手机。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Motorola Moto E20 | |
Nokia G10 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT | |
Motorola Moto E7i Power | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Motorola Moto E20 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT | |
Nokia G10 | |
Motorola Moto E7i Power |
照相机 - 锐度和细节低
在智能手机的背面有两个相机镜头和一个LED闪光灯,但其中只有一个可以真正用于拍照。Moto E20的主摄像头的分辨率为1300万像素,第一眼看去能拍出不错的照片,但在细节上有些冲淡了。
此外,相机的亮度不高,所以明亮的地方被掩盖了,而黑暗的地方则不那么详细。在我们的照片测试中,在1勒克斯的照度下看不到细节。
Moto E20录制的视频最大分辨率为1080p,每秒30帧。曝光调整得相当快,但自动对焦总是需要一秒钟,直到它适应新的情况,然后迅速作出反应,不需要长时间的对焦搜索。
500万像素的前置摄像头可以为家庭使用拍摄体面的自拍照,但你不应该放大太多,因为细节处理相当平庸。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Hauptkamera PflanzeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera Low Light![ColorChecker](fileadmin/_processed_/c/d/csm_Farbchart_high_ce0b1af13d.jpg)
![ColorChecker](fileadmin/_processed_/2/6/csm_Farbchart_low_9c5a348933.jpg)
显示器 - 平均亮度
1,600 x 720的显示屏在分辨率和亮度方面与该级别的其他手机相当。相比之下,显示屏亮度明显高于 摩托E7i Power.黑色水平也很好;因此,对比度很好,颜色看起来更生动一些。
我们在很低的亮度下测量PWM,这种屏幕闪烁可能会给一些人带来问题。如果你在使用过程中喜欢不那么明亮的屏幕,你应该在购买之前仔细看看这个屏幕。
|
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 403 cd/m²
Contrast: 1612:1 (Black: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.31 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.95
ΔE Greyscale 5.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26
Motorola Moto E20 IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | Nokia G10 IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | Motorola Moto E7i Power IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | Xiaomi Redmi 9AT IPS LCD , 1600x720, 6.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Response Times | 9034% | 4510% | 11% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 60 ? | 66 ? -10% | 58 ? 3% | 55 ? 8% |
Response Time Black / White * | 42 ? | 38 ? 10% | 32 ? 24% | 36 ? 14% |
PWM Frequency | 367.6 ? | 100000 27103% | 50000 13502% | |
Screen | 22% | -4% | -21% | |
Brightness middle | 403 | 485 20% | 324 -20% | 374 -7% |
Brightness | 374 | 458 22% | 314 -16% | 345 -8% |
Brightness Distribution | 86 | 89 3% | 92 7% | 85 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.2 20% | 0.2 20% | 0.46 -84% |
Contrast | 1612 | 2425 50% | 1620 0% | 813 -50% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.31 | 3.61 16% | 4.62 -7% | 3.86 10% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.11 | 8.32 -17% | 7.57 -6% | 8.07 -14% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.2 | 2.1 60% | 5.6 -8% | 5.7 -10% |
Gamma | 2.26 97% | 2.195 100% | 2.482 89% | 2.307 95% |
CCT | 7895 82% | 6850 95% | 7524 86% | 6932 94% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 4528% /
2480% | 2253% /
1227% | -5% /
-14% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 25 ms rise | |
↘ 17 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.2 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
60 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 31 ms rise | |
↘ 29 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.2 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 367.6 Hz | ≤ 5 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 367.6 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 5 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 367.6 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17373 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
性能、排放和电池寿命 - 入门级手机,功率很大
该 Unisoc Tiger T606已经是一个两年前的SoC。像诺基亚G10 ,稍微昂贵的竞争者被证明是相当强大的。当然,这款廉价的手机无法跟上中端甚至高端智能手机的步伐,但它足以在日常使用中流畅地浏览菜单和简单应用。
即使经过较长时间的负载,暖气也很难察觉。扬声器的声音很大,但似乎听起来很薄。也就是说,高音几乎没有过度强调的情况。aptX高清编解码器可用于蓝牙连接。
4000毫安时的电池容量似乎有点低,这在电池运行时间上很明显--在我们的Wi-Fi测试中,14:27小时还可以,但类似价格的竞争对手持续时间更长。然而,你不必每天都适度使用电源。小型电源适配器最多可提供10瓦,这意味着充电可能需要近2小时。
Geekbench 5.5 | |
Single-Core (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto E20 | |
Nokia G10 | |
Motorola Moto E7i Power | |
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT | |
Average UNISOC T606 (273 - 313, n=19) | |
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2138, n=188, last 2 years) | |
Multi-Core (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto E20 | |
Nokia G10 | |
Motorola Moto E7i Power | |
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT | |
Average UNISOC T606 (708 - 1324, n=19) | |
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6681, n=188, last 2 years) |
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto E20 | |
Nokia G10 | |
Motorola Moto E7i Power | |
Average UNISOC T606 (6637 - 8303, n=19) | |
Average of class Smartphone (4609 - 21385, n=194, last 2 years) |
GFXBench | |
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto E20 | |
Nokia G10 | |
Motorola Moto E7i Power | |
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT | |
Average UNISOC T606 (5.1 - 11, n=18) | |
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=206, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto E20 | |
Nokia G10 | |
Motorola Moto E7i Power | |
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT | |
Average UNISOC T606 (1.9 - 5.5, n=18) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 229, n=206, last 2 years) | |
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto E20 | |
Nokia G10 | |
Motorola Moto E7i Power | |
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT | |
Average UNISOC T606 (0.85 - 7.3, n=18) | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=206, last 2 years) | |
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto E20 | |
Nokia G10 | |
Motorola Moto E7i Power | |
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT | |
Average UNISOC T606 (0.85 - 2.1, n=18) | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 94, n=206, last 2 years) |
Motorola Moto E20 | Nokia G10 | Motorola Moto E7i Power | Xiaomi Redmi 9AT | Average 32 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -25% | -51% | -25% | -29% | 590% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 263.2 | 245.6 -7% | 90.5 -66% | 266.4 1% | 242 ? -8% | 1717 ? 552% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 105.4 | 120 14% | 117 11% | 84.2 -20% | 100.5 ? -5% | 1322 ? 1154% |
Random Read 4KB | 72.3 | 43.6 -40% | 28.6 -60% | 46.49 -36% | 43.2 ? -40% | 265 ? 267% |
Random Write 4KB | 59.8 | 20 -67% | 7.6 -87% | 33.53 -44% | 22.4 ? -63% | 292 ? 388% |
温度
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.7 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.2 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
扬声器
Motorola Moto E20 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 36.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
Motorola Moto E20 4000 mAh | Nokia G10 5050 mAh | Motorola Moto E7i Power 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi 9AT 5000 mAh | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | |||||
WiFi Websurfing | 867 | 1068 23% | 1125 30% | 1145 32% | 956 ? 10% |
Pros
Cons
结论--重量轻,运行时间短
摩托罗拉Moto E20用很少的钱提供了很大的能量,重量较轻,并具有过时但快速的WLAN。如果这些方面很重要,那么这款廉价的设备可能会引起你的兴趣。
尽管如此,购买者应该知道,他们不能期望以低于100欧元的价格获得锐利的相机照片、非常明亮的屏幕或快速存储。Moto E20并不提供所有这些,所以它更适合那些偶尔使用智能手机,完全不需要某些功能或只需要非常少的用户。大多数入门级手机都是这样的。
与竞争对手相比,摩托罗拉不得不用较短的运行时间来换取手机的低重量,但在我们的WLAN测试中,14:27小时的运行时间仍足以满足日常使用。
摩托罗拉的Moto E20是一款快速、轻便、非常实惠的智能手机,但电池运行时间略短。
如果耐力比纯粹的性能和重量更重要,你应该看看 小米红米9AT.如果你想用很少的钱买一个90赫兹的屏幕,那么 摩托罗拉Moto E40是一个更合适的选择。
价格和可用性
你可以直接从制造商那里获得摩托罗拉Moto E20https://www.motorola.de/smartphones-moto-e-20/p.在测试的时候,互联网零售商已经有一些优惠,如亚马逊(美国)。.
Motorola Moto E20
-
12/06/2021 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt