Notebookcheck Logo

摩托罗拉Moto E32s智能手机评测--低性能入门级机型,有设备奖励

好的论证,坏的论证。

摩托E32s提供快速的Wi-Fi,拥有90赫兹的屏幕,并且可以持续很长时间。然而,这款入门级的手机也不得不在性能上做文章。它还值得再看看吗?
Android ARM Smartphone
摩托罗拉Moto E32s
Motorola Moto E32s (Moto E Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio G37 8 x 1.8 - 2.3 GHz, Cortex-A53
Graphics adapter
Memory
3 GB 
Display
6.50 inch 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixel 270 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 20 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio jack, Card Reader: dedicated microSD slot, up to 1TB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, proximity sensor
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B38/​B40/​B41) , Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.5 x 164 x 74.9
Battery
5000 mAh, 15 Watt charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix f/​2.2, phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @1080p/​30fps (Camera 1); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, macro lens (Camera 2); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, depth of field (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/​2.0, Videos @1080p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, charger, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.630W/​kg (head), 1.790W/​kg (body) , fanless
Weight
185 g
Price
129 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
75.1 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2022
Motorola Moto E32s
Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320
185 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
76.4 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2022
Motorola Moto E32
T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1
184 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.50"1600x720
75.9 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2022
Realme C31
T7225 (T612), Mali-G52 MP1
197 g32 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.50"1600x720
76.6 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2022
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
SD 680, Adreno 610
190 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.71"1650x720

外壳和功能 - 具有IP认证的廉价型号

摩托E32s是一款非常实惠的智能手机,提供两种存储版本。

  • 32GB大容量存储/3GB内存:129欧元
  • 64GB大容量存储/4GB内存:149欧元

在外观和价格方面,它让我们强烈地想起了 摩托E32我们最近测试了它。除了相机模块和音量摇杆的设计有极小的差别外,外壳几乎是相同的。摩托E32s也被装在一个塑料外壳中,其背面的哑光亮面使其变得特别,可以折射光线。

做工很扎实,但你可以感觉到一些地方的材料过渡,而且由于设计稍显前卫,手机拿在手里感觉不是很顺手。压力不会对设备产生太大影响,即使在扭曲的情况下,它仍然相当稳定。

IP52认证证明了该智能手机对飞溅的水和灰尘的基本抵抗力。

这款Moto手机提供了一个专用的microSD插槽用于内存扩展。在我们的基准测试中,它在速度方面的表现处于同类水平,但不能脱颖而出。

摩托罗拉Moto E32s
摩托罗拉Moto E32s
摩托罗拉Moto E32s
摩托罗拉Moto E32s

尺寸比较

169.6 mm 76.6 mm 8.3 mm 190 g164.7 mm 76.1 mm 8.4 mm 197 g164 mm 74.9 mm 8.5 mm 185 g164 mm 74.9 mm 8.5 mm 184 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
  (Angelbird V60)
34.9 MB/s +77%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.7 - 77, n=81, last 2 years)
29.5 MB/s +50%
Motorola Moto E32s
  (Angelbird V60)
19.7 MB/s
Motorola Moto E32
  (Angelbird V60)
18.4 MB/s -7%
Realme C31
  (Angelbird V60)
15.3 MB/s -22%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Motorola Moto E32s PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø36.4 (21.4-45.6)
Motorola Moto E32 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø29.3 (14.6-45.5)
Realme C31 Mali-G52 MP1, T7225 (T612), 32 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø30.7 (19.8-43.9)
Xiaomi Redmi 10C Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38.2 (26.4-46.1)
Motorola Moto E32s PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø75.9 (69.7-77.2)
Motorola Moto E32 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø75.6 (41.3-85.5)
Realme C31 Mali-G52 MP1, T7225 (T612), 32 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø74.9 (58.6-79.3)
Xiaomi Redmi 10C Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø78.7 (28.6-82.6)

通信、软件和操作 - 船上的快速互联网

与之相比摩托E32,Moto E32s甚至具有Wi-Fi 5的功能,在我们用参考路由器华硕ROG AXE11000进行的Wi-Fi测试中,可以用非常高的速度来说服人,在这个价格范围内几乎没有任何其他智能手机可以提供。

在移动连接方面,有4G连接,但只有相当少的频段,所以在国外使用可能会有问题。在整个测试期间,我们的样品的接收质量相当平庸,明显低于高端手机中数量和质量更好的天线所能达到的水平。

Android 12预装在我们的测试设备上,这是一个积极的惊喜,因为它是最新的广泛使用的 版本。然而,没有关于进一步更新的信息。安全补丁是从2022年6月开始的,因此在测试的时候迫切需要刷新。摩托罗拉安装了相当纯粹的 ,只有一些自己的应用程序,没有臃肿的软件。Android Android

由于90赫兹的屏幕,使用触摸屏可以可靠地工作,而且往往相当流畅。然而,由于性能低下导致的抖动很常见,特别是在系统启动后不久或在后台任务期间。与Moto E32相比,它需要的时间要长得多。 摩托E32指纹传感器集成在右侧的待机按钮上,解锁智能手机所需的时间比Moto E32要长得多。然而,识别是可靠的,它也可以用来解锁带有敏感信息的应用程序。脸部识别也是可用的,在日光下效果很好,但由于是纯粹的二维软件解决方案,所以不那么安全。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Motorola Moto E32s
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
329 (293min - 378max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
315 (269min - 336max) MBit/s -4%
Realme C31
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
78.3 (73min - 92max) MBit/s -76%
Motorola Moto E32
802.11 b/g/n
57.7 (25min - 71max) MBit/s -82%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Motorola Moto E32s
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
320 (295min - 332max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
222 (194min - 242max) MBit/s -31%
Realme C31
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
72.5 (34min - 78max) MBit/s -77%
Motorola Moto E32
802.11 b/g/n
45.8 (23min - 57max) MBit/s -86%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Motorola Moto E32s; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø319 (295-332)
Motorola Moto E32s; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø329 (293-378)

照相机 - 摩托车配备1600万像素传感器

来自前置摄像头的照片
来自前置摄像头的照片

后面的主镜头是一个1600万像素的摄像头。它允许在白天拍摄体面的照片,尽管细节看起来总是有点模糊。亮度不是特别好;只要太阳稍微弱一点,照片就会显得很暗。还有一个分辨率为200万像素的微距镜头和一个用于模糊效果的附加摄像头,不能用于独立的照片。

在光线很暗的情况下,绘图在黑暗的地方会丢失,整个图片看起来也很模糊。在只有1勒克斯的照度下,仍然可以昏暗地识别图片,但细节已经很难辨认出来。

用主摄像头拍摄的视频最大可以达到1080p和30fps。自动对焦功能在处理近距离物体时有时会有点吃力,但总的来说,它的工作速度相当快,而且通常没有抽风现象。曝光补偿很扎实,但整体图像质量略显模糊,就像照片中一样。

前置摄像头的分辨率为800万像素。在光线良好的情况下,它可以拍出合格的自拍,但在我们的测试照片中,只有少数细节显示在头发上。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow Light
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
5.7 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
1.4 ∆E
4 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto E32s: 4.16 ∆E min: 1.37 - max: 8.86 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.4 ∆E
54.1 ∆E
39.6 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
44.7 ∆E
62 ∆E
53.3 ∆E
35.2 ∆E
42.8 ∆E
28 ∆E
64.5 ∆E
63.5 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
47.2 ∆E
37.2 ∆E
75.4 ∆E
43.1 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
90.9 ∆E
70.6 ∆E
52 ∆E
37 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto E32s: 46.64 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 90.94 ∆E

显示 - 可提供90-Hz显示

子像素结构
子像素结构

摩托罗拉安装了一个90Hz的显示屏,可以在视频或滚动时提供快速操作和流畅的动作。然而,摩托罗拉忽略了亮度:屏幕的最大亮度为346cd/m²,明显低于例如 小米红米10C.因此,你将很难在白天的户外或其他非常明亮的环境中使用该智能手机。

720p IPS屏幕的黑色水平很一般,这也导致只有适度的对比度。因此,黑暗区域看起来更灰暗,而不是真正的黑色,颜色看起来有些暗淡。在我们对色彩准确性的测量中,有部分偏离了最佳状态,特别是棕色调,看起来强烈失真,在灰阶中可以看到明显的棕色偏色。

然而,我们没有注意到任何PWM,所以即使是敏感的人也应该能够应付这款手机的屏幕。

328
cd/m²
336
cd/m²
342
cd/m²
331
cd/m²
346
cd/m²
323
cd/m²
310
cd/m²
335
cd/m²
320
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 346 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 330.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 346 cd/m²
Contrast: 736:1 (Black: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.874
Motorola Moto E32s
IPS, 1600x720, 6.5"
Motorola Moto E32
IPS, 1600x720, 6.5"
Realme C31
IPS, 1600x720, 6.5"
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
IPS, 1650x720, 6.7"
Response Times
-25%
-78%
-1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
30 ?(16, 14)
40 ?(22, 18)
-33%
62 ?(33, 29)
-107%
33 ?(17, 16)
-10%
Response Time Black / White *
23 ?(8, 15)
27 ?(13, 14)
-17%
34 ?(21, 13)
-48%
21 ?(9, 12)
9%
PWM Frequency
Screen
7%
15%
44%
Brightness middle
346
375
8%
413
19%
511
48%
Brightness
330
339
3%
394
19%
478
45%
Brightness Distribution
90
84
-7%
91
1%
84
-7%
Black Level *
0.47
0.52
-11%
0.4
15%
0.42
11%
Contrast
736
721
-2%
1033
40%
1217
65%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.4
4.41
18%
4.89
9%
1.51
72%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9
6.55
27%
8.35
7%
2.53
72%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.5
4.6
16%
4.9
11%
2.9
47%
Gamma
2.874 77%
2.275 97%
2.395 92%
2.266 97%
CCT
5971 109%
7641 85%
7598 86%
6443 101%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-9% / 0%
-32% / -3%
22% / 35%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN色彩空间
CalMAN色彩空间
CalMAN饱和度
CalMAN饱和度

性能、排放和电池寿命 - 功率小,运行时间长

联发科Helio G37是一个相当弱的SoC,我们已经在摩托罗拉Moto G22.即使在那里,我们对该处理器也没有什么兴趣,因为它没有提供多少性能。

Moto E32s已经显示了用户在第一次启动后可以期待的情况:手机停滞不前,几分钟内几乎无法使用。此后,系统趋于稳定,你可以在日常操作中或多或少地使用它,但你必须忍受漫长的加载时间,甚至在你开始使用稍微复杂的应用程序时就会出现停顿。

蹩脚的eMMC存储也是原因之一,在最便宜的类别中几乎没有任何手机使用它。在较长的系统高负荷时期,温度会上升到43℃,但这还不是关键。

底部边缘的单声道扬声器声音一般,不能提供足够的低音调,但即使在最大音量下也不会过度,提供相当干净的声音。对于偶尔的视频或听音乐来说,它是足够的。一个3.5毫米接口和蓝牙5.0可用于连接外部音频设备。蓝牙支持aptX和aptX HD,但不支持更现代的编解码版本。

5,000毫安时的电池容量与竞争对手持平。在我们的WLAN测试中,这款手机实现了16:12小时的良好运行时间。它击败了所有的对比设备,即使有些只是25分钟。在正常使用的情况下,这款手机至少应该在远离电源插座的地方准备好几天。

我们发现,尽管可以选择使用15瓦的充电电源,但只包括一个10瓦的电源,这让我们很恼火。因此,直到电池再次充满,需要远远超过2个小时。现有的一个功率更大的充电器可以缩短约40分钟的充电时间。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E32s
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
160 Points
Motorola Moto E32
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
312 Points +95%
Realme C31
Unisoc T7225 (T612), Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
346 Points +116%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
377 Points +136%
Average Mediatek Helio G37
  (146 - 172, n=4)
160 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=175, last 2 years)
1040 Points +550%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E32s
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
656 Points
Motorola Moto E32
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1186 Points +81%
Realme C31
Unisoc T7225 (T612), Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
1322 Points +102%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1644 Points +151%
Average Mediatek Helio G37
  (553 - 947, n=4)
728 Points +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=175, last 2 years)
3474 Points +430%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E32s
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
5815 Points
Motorola Moto E32
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
7815 Points +34%
Realme C31
Unisoc T7225 (T612), Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
7776 Points +34%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
5884 Points +1%
Average Mediatek Helio G37
  (4922 - 5815, n=4)
5435 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years)
13174 Points +127%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E32s
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
919 Points
Realme C31
Unisoc T7225 (T612), Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
1527 Points +66%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2185 Points +138%
Average Mediatek Helio G37
  (895 - 921, n=3)
912 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 23024, n=72, last 2 years)
11215 Points +1120%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E32s
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
853 Points
Realme C31
Unisoc T7225 (T612), Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
1343 Points +57%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2054 Points +141%
Average Mediatek Helio G37
  (838 - 853, n=3)
847 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (840 - 45492, n=72, last 2 years)
19933 Points +2237%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E32s
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1257 Points
Realme C31
Unisoc T7225 (T612), Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
2942 Points +134%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2810 Points +124%
Average Mediatek Helio G37
  (1173 - 1292, n=3)
1241 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1075 - 8749, n=72, last 2 years)
5021 Points +299%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E32s
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
468 Points
Motorola Moto E32
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
956 Points +104%
Realme C31
Unisoc T7225 (T612), Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
989 Points +111%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1353 Points +189%
Average Mediatek Helio G37
  (435 - 468, n=3)
452 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 17553, n=69, last 2 years)
3014 Points +544%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E32s
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
397 Points
Motorola Moto E32
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
812 Points +105%
Realme C31
Unisoc T7225 (T612), Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
834 Points +110%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1177 Points +196%
Average Mediatek Helio G37
  (370 - 397, n=3)
383 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 29890, n=69, last 2 years)
3179 Points +701%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E32s
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1260 Points
Motorola Moto E32
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
2524 Points +100%
Realme C31
Unisoc T7225 (T612), Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
2832 Points +125%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2831 Points +125%
Average Mediatek Helio G37
  (1129 - 1265, n=3)
1218 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 7180, n=69, last 2 years)
3259 Points +159%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E32s
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
537 Points
Motorola Moto E32
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
970 Points +81%
Realme C31
Unisoc T7225 (T612), Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
988 Points +84%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1350 Points +151%
Average Mediatek Helio G37
  (532 - 537, n=3)
535 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 23762, n=163, last 2 years)
8239 Points +1434%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E32s
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
460 Points
Motorola Moto E32
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
821 Points +78%
Realme C31
Unisoc T7225 (T612), Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
829 Points +80%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1175 Points +155%
Average Mediatek Helio G37
  (459 - 460, n=3)
460 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 40163, n=163, last 2 years)
12402 Points +2596%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E32s
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1298 Points
Motorola Moto E32
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
2664 Points +105%
Realme C31
Unisoc T7225 (T612), Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
2990 Points +130%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2825 Points +118%
Average Mediatek Helio G37
  (1211 - 1298, n=3)
1264 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (877 - 10632, n=163, last 2 years)
4754 Points +266%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E32
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
395 Points
Realme C31
Unisoc T7225 (T612), Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
411 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
450 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (408 - 13896, n=112, last 2 years)
2816 Points
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E32
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
394 Points
Realme C31
Unisoc T7225 (T612), Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
410 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
438 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (413 - 25785, n=188, last 2 years)
7925 Points
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E32
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
111 Points
Realme C31
Unisoc T7225 (T612), Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
117 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
122 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (114 - 7094, n=194, last 2 years)
2182 Points
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E32
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
110 Points
Realme C31
Unisoc T7225 (T612), Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
111 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
122 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (112 - 7212, n=193, last 2 years)
2166 Points
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E32s
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
7.9 fps
Motorola Moto E32
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
9.9 fps +25%
Realme C31
Unisoc T7225 (T612), Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
10 fps +27%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
17 fps +115%
Average Mediatek Helio G37
  (7 - 7.9, n=4)
7.6 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 166, n=207, last 2 years)
50.7 fps +542%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E32s
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4.2 fps
Motorola Moto E32
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
5.3 fps +26%
Realme C31
Unisoc T7225 (T612), Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
5.3 fps +26%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
9.5 fps +126%
Average Mediatek Helio G37
  (4 - 4.2, n=4)
4.15 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 321, n=207, last 2 years)
84.9 fps +1921%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E32s
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
5 fps
Motorola Moto E32
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
6.2 fps +24%
Realme C31
Unisoc T7225 (T612), Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
6.4 fps +28%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
10 fps +100%
Average Mediatek Helio G37
  (4.9 - 5, n=4)
4.95 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 144, n=208, last 2 years)
39.2 fps +684%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E32s
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1.5 fps
Motorola Moto E32
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1.9 fps +27%
Realme C31
Unisoc T7225 (T612), Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
1.9 fps +27%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
3.2 fps +113%
Average Mediatek Helio G37
  (1.5 - 1.5, n=4)
1.5 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 129, n=208, last 2 years)
34.3 fps +2187%
Motorola Moto E32sMotorola Moto E32Realme C31Xiaomi Redmi 10CAverage 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
156%
50%
246%
-26%
626%
Sequential Read 256KB
248.6
664.3
167%
478.8
93%
927.7
273%
Sequential Write 256KB
184.3
250.7
36%
131.9
-28%
510.2
177%
100.5 ?(14.8 - 196, n=247)
-45%
Random Read 4KB
49.1
139.1
183%
89
81%
120.2
145%
Random Write 4KB
40
134.3
236%
61.5
54%
195.2
388%
22.4 ?(0.75 - 91, n=247)
-44%

温度

Max. Load
 39.8 °C35.7 °C32.8 °C 
 39.4 °C34.8 °C32.1 °C 
 38.4 °C35.1 °C32.4 °C 
Maximum: 39.8 °C
Average: 35.6 °C
33.8 °C36.1 °C41.1 °C
33.6 °C36.2 °C43 °C
33.9 °C37.5 °C42 °C
Maximum: 43 °C
Average: 37.5 °C
Power Supply (max.)  39.6 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.


热力图前线
热力图前线
热图 背面
热图 背面

演讲者

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.239.12540.338.63131.530.74030.330.45033.7386323.725.58022.424.710022.722.312515.519.81601927.620015.334.525014.344.431513.951.940015.256.250015.761.263015.363.880018.365.4100017.171.512501874160014.871200014.369.5250014.268.6315014.967.9400015.366.350001668.9630016.962.8800016.261.91000017.161.71250016.262.61600016.654SPL28.180.6N145.6median 15.7median 62.6Delta1.111.436.736.735.738.527.330.233.331.237.432.225.226.718.219.820.520.413.52017.33113.535.413.541.713.14612.950.313.358.815.462.514.165.612.969.19.669.910.668.510.368.21167.812.666.415.264.416.865.316.461.916.565.616.671.815.972.316.654.726.379.30.743median 13.5median 64.42.411.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Moto E32sXiaomi Redmi 10C
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Moto E32s audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi 10C audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Average of class Smartphone
  (476 - 3244, n=209, last 2 years)
995 min +2%
Motorola Moto E32s
5000 mAh
972 min
Realme C31
5000 mAh
947 min -3%
Motorola Moto E32
5000 mAh
947 min -3%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
5000 mAh
908 min -7%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
16h 12min

Pros

+ Android 12前的工作
+ 没有臃肿的软件
+ WiFi 5
+ 90赫兹屏幕
+ 电池寿命长
+ 别致的设计

Cons

- 内存慢
- 系统功率小
- 供货范围内的充电器很弱
- 阴暗的屏幕
- 少量的4G频率

结论 -- 设备不错,但性能...

在审查中。摩托罗拉Moto E32s。测试设备由:
在审查中。摩托罗拉Moto E32s。测试设备由:
数码港.com

如果你正在寻找一款具有良好功能的廉价手机,那么摩托罗拉的Moto E32s会让你的钱花得物有所值:Moto E32s具有WiFi 5、90Hz屏幕和现代的Android 12,你在Moto E32s中得到了一些东西,否则你不会在一部130欧元的智能手机中找到。我们也喜欢电池的长运行时间。唯一令人讨厌的是附带的充电器太弱。

如果摩托罗拉尝试使用更强大的SoC就好了......在第一次启动系统时,你就注意到只有少量的性能储备,除非你几乎不给你的智能手机增加任何负荷,否则停顿和等待时间就是日常生活的一部分。昏暗的屏幕就不必了,相机也更适合快照而不是严肃的摄影。

摩托罗拉Moto E32s是一个有点奇怪的组合,它有90赫兹的帧率,快速的WLAN,以及现代的操作系统,性能很差,屏幕也很阴暗。

然而,如果这对你来说已经足够,而且你只想用智能手机完成基本任务,但需要快速上网和良好的耐力,那么Moto E32s绝对值得一看。我们推荐稍贵的64GB版本,即使你只是偶尔拍照或下载音乐,否则,存储空间很快就会满了。

这款手机 小米红米10C(目前在amazon.de有159欧元的价格。更贵一点)提供了更亮的屏幕,更多的电力和更快的存储。你在这里还能得到WiFi 5,但只有60Hz的屏幕。然而,总的来说,这是一个非常有趣的替代品,具有更大的性能潜力。

价格和可用性

制造商自己表示,在本次审查时,Moto E32s还没有上市。

然而,在我们的贷款人cyberport.de上,32GB存储空间的设备目前以130欧元的价格出售。,目前你也可以在amazon.de上多付几欧元购买。.

目前,在德语国家只有极少数64GB版本的报价。

Motorola Moto E32s - 09/07/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
81%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
45 / 70 → 64%
Weight
89%
Battery
91%
Display
81%
Games Performance
6 / 64 → 10%
Application Performance
50 / 86 → 58%
Temperature
90%
Noise
100%
Audio
54 / 90 → 60%
Camera
51%
Average
69%
75%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 摩托罗拉Moto E32s智能手机评测--低性能入门级机型,有设备奖励
Florian Schmitt, 2022-09- 9 (Update: 2022-09- 9)