摩托罗拉 Moto G04 智能手机评测--一款设备齐全、价格低廉的手机
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price from |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 77.7 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | Motorola Moto G04 T7200, Mali-G57 MP1 | 179 g | 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.56" | 1612x720 | |
| 77.7 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | Xiaomi Redmi 13C Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2 | 192 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.74" | 1600x720 | |
| 78.1 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2023 | Motorola Moto G14 T7255, Mali-G57 MP1 | 177 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.50" | 2400x1080 | |
| 73.8 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | Xiaomi Redmi A2 Helio G36, PowerVR GE8320 | 192 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.52" | 1600x720 |
外壳和连接性 - 美观、稳定
除了经典的黑色外，摩托罗拉还推出了蓝色、绿色和橙色的平价机型 Moto G04。机身背面由塑料制成，略微闪亮，表面呈哑光处理。因此，它不太容易沾染指纹。这款智能手机的结构非常坚固，压力和扭曲都不会对它造成任何影响，我们也无法从它身上听到任何吱吱嘎嘎的声音。
手机的材质过渡也非常简洁，稍厚的摄像头模块在向背面过渡时略带弧度，看起来非常优雅。
64 GB 的大容量存储空间和 4 GB 的运行内存在我们的测试机型上显得有些紧张；国际上也有 128 GB 存储空间和 8 GB 运行内存的机型。手机顶部边缘有一个耳机插孔，底部有一个 USB-C 接口。后者只能通过 USB 2.0 接口进行内部连接，很难提高数据传输的速度。值得高兴的是，摩托罗拉为无线支付服务和标签读取安装了 NFC。
除了 2 个 SIM 卡插槽外，它还有一个专用的 microSD 卡插槽，可以用来扩展手机存储空间。我们使用我们的参考 microSD 卡--Angelbird V60--进行了测试，发现速度相当不错。不过，在 CPDT 基准测试中，我们注意到传输速率偶尔会下降。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 13C (Angelbird V60) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (7.7 - 77, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto G04 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi A2 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Motorola Moto G14 (Angelbird V60) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信、软件和操作 - Moto G04 的无线局域网速度缓慢
尽管制造商称摩托罗拉 Moto G04 支持 WiFi 5，但在我们的测试中，该智能手机并不能达到典型的速度--即使在多次重复测试后也是如此。相反，只能达到较慢的 WiFi 4 速度，这将其传输速率限制在 50 Mbps 左右。即使只有一根天线，我们也希望能看到更好的结果。也许摩托罗拉可以提供软件更新。
该设备是一款 4G 手机，支持在中欧（测试地点）使用的所有必要频率。但是，如果您计划去更远的地方旅行，您应该提前检查手机是否能在目的地国家连接网络。在测试期间，当我们采集一些样本时，手机的接收能力有时不强。
这款手机安装了Android 14，摩托罗拉几乎没有对谷歌操作系统做任何改动。手机上预装了几款游戏。Moto G04 通过了 Widevine 认证，这意味着您可以从大多数主要流媒体平台以高清格式观看流媒体。制造商承诺每两个月进行一次软件更新，直至 2026 年 1 月。虽然时间不算太长，但在这个价位的手机中，更新承诺本身就很罕见。
尽管价格低廉，但 Moto G04 的触摸屏频率高达 90 赫兹，操作起来十分流畅。触摸屏在边边角角都能保持非常灵敏的反应。实体音量键和待机键位于机壳右侧。你可以很容易地摸到它们，而且它们都有明确的按压点。
待机键上还集成了指纹传感器，一旦记住指纹，就能快速、可靠地解锁手机。此外，它还具有面部识别功能，该功能也能可靠地工作，即使在黑暗中，手机屏幕发出的光线通常也足以进行识别。
| Networking | |
| Motorola Moto G04 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 13C | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Motorola Moto G14 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi A2 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
相机 - 令人惊讶的日光拍摄效果
摩托罗拉 Moto G04 背面只配备了一个摄像头。这是一个 1600 万像素的镜头。
拍出来的照片在这个价位的手机中还算不错，亮部没有曝光过度，暗部也能看出一些细节。在放大的照片中，你只能辨认出很少的细节，而更昂贵的手机通常在照片的亮度方面做得更好，但总的来说，主摄像头在白天的效果还是不错的。
而在弱光环境下，镜头的弱点就显现出来了：清晰度大幅下降，照片暗部几乎无法辨认。在 1 勒克斯的光照条件下，照片只是一片漆黑。
视频最高可录制 1080p 和 30 fps；相机的自动对焦和曝光调整速度出奇地快，总体而言，视频效果在同价位产品中相当不错。
手机正面有一个 500 万像素的自拍摄像头。即使在光线良好的条件下，使用该镜头拍摄的照片也常常显得非常暗。放大后，图像的清晰度一般都不错，但色彩过渡显得相当粗糙，暗处看不到细节。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera plantMain camera surroundingsMain camera low light
显示屏 - 色彩描绘得体
手机显示屏直径为 6.56 英寸，采用 IPS 面板，分辨率为 1,612 x 720 像素。这在这个价位的手机中很常见，但与更高分辨率的屏幕相比，屏幕显得有些模糊。
该面板的平均最大亮度为 396 cd/m²，但并不是户外专家：尤其是在晴天，强烈的反光会遮住屏幕内容。因此，这款手机更适合在室内和有遮挡的室外使用。
其黑色水平和对比度一般；我们使用分光光度计和 CalMAN 软件进行的测试仅显示出非常轻微的偏蓝。
即使在低亮度水平下，我们也没有注意到 PWM 闪烁。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 414 cd/m²
Contrast: 1218:1 (Black: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.26 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.075
| Motorola Moto G04 IPS, 1612x720, 6.6" | Xiaomi Redmi 13C IPS, 1600x720, 6.7" | Motorola Moto G14 IPS, 2400x1080, 6.5" | Xiaomi Redmi A2 IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | 2% | 16% | 21% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 47.8 ? | 44.9 ? 6% | 34.2 ? 28% | 36.8 ? 23% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 28.5 ? | 29.2 ? -2% | 27.6 ? 3% | 23.2 ? 19% |
| PWM Frequency | ||||
| Screen | -2% | -10% | 1% | |
| Brightness middle | 414 | 430 4% | 486 17% | 391 -6% |
| Brightness | 396 | 424 7% | 478 21% | 379 -4% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 92 1% | 92 1% | 94 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.34 | 0.28 18% | 0.45 -32% | 0.3 12% |
| Contrast | 1218 | 1536 26% | 1080 -11% | 1303 7% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.26 | 4.06 -25% | 4.68 -44% | 3.31 -2% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.74 | 8.11 -20% | 7.33 -9% | 7.67 -14% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.9 | 5 -28% | 4.8 -23% | 3.6 8% |
| Gamma | 2.075 106% | 2.35 94% | 2.29 96% | 2.307 95% |
| CCT | 6914 94% | 7813 83% | 7691 85% | 7427 88% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 0% /
-1% | 3% /
-5% | 11% /
5% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 47.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 23 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 80 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能、排放和电池寿命 - 几乎不耗电，运行时间长
即使是在非常实惠的价格范围内，摩托罗拉也选择了一款相当慢的 SoC，即 Unisoc T606.由于这款手机的屏幕分辨率较低，因此在屏幕测试中图形性能尚可，但在浏览器基准测试中性能却急剧下降。在日常使用中，这意味着你不得不经常忍受卡顿和较长的等待时间。
另一方面，摩托罗拉在手机存储方面也没有偷懒，它安装了 UFS 2.2 闪存，这种闪存速度很快，也被更昂贵的手机所采用。
在长时间负载的情况下，我们测得设备外壳的最高温升为 40.8°C。这并不严重，但很明显。3DMark 压力测试表明，即使多次重复基准测试，SoC 的性能也基本保持不变，换句话说，SoC 没有节流。
底部边缘的扬声器必须独立运行，因此只能提供单声道音效。它的音量足以填满一个中等大小的房间，但我们的示意图已经证实，它没有低音，只有一些中低音。我们在听音测试后也证实了这一结果：声音和人声清晰易懂，但音乐听起来平淡无奇，高音很重。
如果连接外置扬声器或耳机，通常会获得更好的音效。可以通过机壳顶部边缘的 3.5 毫米插孔或蓝牙连接。有多种无线音频编解码器可供选择：除了 AAC、SBC、aptX、aptX HD 和 LDAC 等标准外，该手机还支持 LC3 和 Opus 等更奇特的变体。
摩托罗拉 Moto G04 的 5,000 mAh 电池在同价位手机中表现一般：在我们的 WLAN 测试中，该设备的续航时间达到了 15:07 小时，这表明你可以中度使用手机一天而无需充电。
手机随附一个充电器，但它最多只能提供 10 瓦的功率，而手机明确支持高达 15 瓦的充电功率。这在很多方面都是令人讨厌的：使用附带的充电器充电，充电过程大约需要一个小时。此外，想要充分利用全部功率的用户可能不得不购买另一个充电器，这将产生额外的电子垃圾。
| PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4609 - 24088, n=190, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 13C | |
| Motorola Moto G04 | |
| Motorola Moto G14 | |
| Average Unisoc T7200 (6637 - 8303, n=19) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi A2 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 13C | |
| Motorola Moto G14 | |
| Average Unisoc T7200 (2228 - 13455, n=14) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi A2 | |
| Motorola Moto G04 | |
| Motorola Moto G04 | Xiaomi Redmi 13C | Motorola Moto G14 | Xiaomi Redmi A2 | Average 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -53% | 19% | -74% | -12% | 115% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 978.7 | 300.2 -69% | 888.6 -9% | 268.9 -73% | 770 ? -21% | 1839 ? 88% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 389.3 | 179.4 -54% | 538.1 38% | 116.1 -70% | 399 ? 2% | 1425 ? 266% |
| Random Read 4KB | 184.1 | 101.5 -45% | 221.3 20% | 53.6 -71% | 156.6 ? -15% | 277 ? 50% |
| Random Write 4KB | 201.2 | 114.8 -43% | 251.7 25% | 40.5 -80% | 177.7 ? -12% | 309 ? 54% |
温度
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Wild Life Stress Test
发言人
Motorola Moto G04 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Redmi A2 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
运行时间
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| Motorola Moto G14 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (476 - 3244, n=203, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 13C | |
| Motorola Moto G04 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi A2 | |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 非常实惠，有亮点，但也有不足之处
摩托罗拉的 Moto G04 是一款经济型手机，实际上给我们留下了不错的印象：它采用真彩屏，在日光下也能拍出漂亮的照片。它的电池续航时间长，外壳稳定，设计精美，甚至还承诺更新至 2026 年。其他亮点还包括快速指纹传感器、高速存储、90 赫兹屏幕和 NFC。
不过，它也有缺点：摩托罗拉也许还能通过软件更新来解决手机Wi-Fi速度慢的问题。不过，该智能手机的 SoC 速度较慢、扬声器音效平平、电源适配器较弱，这些都是你不得不接受的妥协。
总之，在我们看来，如果你只是在寻找第二部手机，或者真的不想再花钱，那么这款手机的优点还是多于缺点的。总而言之，摩托罗拉 Moto G04 是一个不错的选择。
摩托罗拉 Moto G04 可以用很少的钱买到，同时还能提供一些设备亮点和更新承诺。
一个可能的选择红米 红米 13C价格与 Moto G04 相近。它甚至还有 4 年的更新承诺和同样吸引人的外壳。
价格和供应情况
在撰写本文时，摩托罗拉 Moto G04 的售价约为 130 美元，但在美国尚无法购买。
Motorola Moto G04
- 04/28/2024 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
