Notebookcheck Logo

小米红米 13C 智能手机评测--设计新颖、存储容量大的廉价手机

恢复到原来的大小?

在红米 12C 在某些方面显得有些落伍之后,目前的小米红米 13C 旨在重新夺回平价智能手机的宝座。包括相当大的功率、大量存储空间和 90Hz 屏幕。这足以让它成功复出吗?
Android ARM Smartphone

"终于没有 micro-USB 接口了"--这是我们拆开红米 13C 包装时的第一个想法。在测试这款手机的前代产品时,我们注意到这个过时的接口是一个负面因素。现在,这款经济实惠的小米手机又与时俱进了,甚至采用了全新的设计。

它继续依靠 Helio G85作为处理器,就该手机的价格范围而言,应该仍能提供足够的动力。此外,它还配备了大容量内存:如果需要,你可以选择高达 8 GB 的内存和 256 GB 的存储空间。

在本次测试中,我们将仔细分析小米红米 13C 是否物有所值,或者它毕竟可能不是那么成功的复出之作。

Xiaomi Redmi 13C (Redmi 13 Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio G85 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
4 GB 
Display
6.74 inch 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixel 260 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB 
, 105 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD (dedicated, up to 1TB), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.1 x 168 x 78
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 18 Watt charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.8, phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @1080p/​30fps (Camera 1); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, macro lens (Camera 2)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/​2.0, Videos @1080p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.98W/​kg Head, 0.99W/​kg Body; FM radio, fanless
Weight
192 g
Price
149 Euro
Amazon
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
77.7 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2024
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2
192 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.74"1600x720
76.6 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2023
Xiaomi Redmi 12C
Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2
192 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.71"1650x720
78.1 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2023
Motorola Moto G14
T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1
177 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.50"2400x1080
77.2 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2023
Nokia G11 Plus
T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1
192 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.52"1600x720
75.9 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2023
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2
201 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.60"2408x1080

小米公司对红米 13C 的设计进行了全面改造,这是有充分理由的:它的前代产品慢慢地看起来更像一款典型的廉价智能手机,背面的条纹图案和圆润的边缘有些毫无生气。

而现在的机型则设计得更具现代感。虽然制造商仍然使用塑料边框和背面,但它现在看起来更优雅了:你可以选择四叶草绿、冰川白、午夜黑和海军蓝四种颜色。尽管如此,所有颜色都非常柔和,因此在专业环境中并不显眼。手机背面是磨砂的,不过我们的蓝色测试样品在光线照射下会略微闪烁。白色机型看起来最抢眼:它的表面仿佛形成了一个个晶体。

方形摄像头模块采用高光处理,使其与背面的其他部分在视觉上显得格外突出。模块与背面齐平,只有镜头本身突出于机身。正面屏幕周围有明显的边框,但在这个价位的手机中,这是可以原谅的。

红米 13C 的重量为 192 克,与上一代产品相当,也是这个尺寸智能手机的平均重量,这意味着它既不会太轻(显得廉价),也不会太重(会让你的手臂感到疲劳)。它组装得很好,即使使用较大的压力,也不会扭曲或凹陷手机。

尺寸比较

168.8 mm 76.4 mm 8.8 mm 192 g167.7 mm 78 mm 9.1 mm 201 g168 mm 78 mm 8.1 mm 192 g164.8 mm 75.9 mm 8.6 mm 192 g161.5 mm 73.8 mm 8 mm 177 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性 - 真正的存储巨人

小米提供不同存储容量的手机:

  • 128 GB 存储空间/4 GB 内存:约 160 美元
  • 128 GB 存储空间/6 GB 内存:约 180 美元
  • 256 GB 存储空间/8 GB 内存:约合 200 美元

对于一款售价远低于 200 美元的手机来说,这些存储容量已经相当可观了--即使它只是相对较慢的 eMMC 闪存。不过,在我们看来,多花 20 美元购买内存更大、存储容量更高的 128 GB 机型几乎没有任何意义。

值得庆幸的是,小米最终决定取消红米 12C 上的 micro-USB 接口。这或许要部分归功于欧盟,因为它迫使制造商使用一种标准的连接方式。无论如何,红米 13C 现在配备了一个 USB-C 端口,内部通过 USB 2.0 连接。

此外,还配备了 NFC 功能,这意味着您可以通过相应的应用程序轻松使用手机进行非接触式支付。

底部:麦克风、USB-C 接口、扬声器
底部:麦克风、USB-C 接口、扬声器
顶部:3.5 毫米音频插孔
顶部:3.5 毫米音频插孔
右:待机键,音量摇杆
右:待机键,音量摇杆
左:SIM 卡插槽
左:SIM 卡插槽

microSD 读卡器

除了两个 SIM 卡插槽外,这款手机还配备了一个指定的 microSD 卡插槽,可以用来扩展存储空间。我们使用 Angelbird V60 参考卡对读卡器进行了全面测试,结果表明它在同类产品中表现出色,尤其是与手机的前代产品相比:它的传输速率约为 30.2 MByte/s,而且即使重复测试,传输速率也能保持稳定。不过 三星Galaxy A14 LTE表明,速度还可以更快。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
50 MB/s +66%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
30.2 MB/s
Nokia G11 Plus
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
24.4 MB/s -19%
Xiaomi Redmi 12C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
18.9 MB/s -37%
Motorola Moto G14
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
16.9 MB/s -44%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi 13C Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø31.6 (19.3-45.4)
Xiaomi Redmi 12C Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø36.5 (23-48)
Motorola Moto G14 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø38.2 (27.2-47)
Nokia G11 Plus Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38.5 (21.2-48)
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø34.3 (26.7-47.7)
Xiaomi Redmi 13C Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø69.8 (31.7-79.9)
Xiaomi Redmi 12C Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø70.3 (36.9-77.5)
Motorola Moto G14 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø71.5 (32.3-80.4)
Nokia G11 Plus Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø72.4 (38.1-82.1)
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø74.3 (37-79.3)

软件 - 4 年软件支持

现在,你会认为一款名为 MIUI 14 的软件会以Android 14 为基础。然而,奇怪的是,小米的内部分类似乎要领先一个数字,因为Android 13 构成了这个操作系统的基础。该系统在许多方面都进行了定制,因此小米手机的新用户可能需要一段时间才能上手。

手机预装了很多应用程序,一方面是小米的应用程序,另一方面还有一些第三方赞助的应用程序。如果你想要一个干净的系统,那就得先花点时间整理一下。

在其网站上,小米将红米 13C 列入Android 企业推荐手机,还说明了该手机的更新频率和更新时间:每 90 天将提供一个安全补丁,持续整整 4 年。此外,它还将收到至少两个新版本的Android ,因此它应该还能看到Android 15。

对于这样一款物美价廉的智能手机来说,这是一个很好的承诺,不过,在测试时,该设备的最新安全补丁是 2023 年 11 月初的,这意味着更新应该是时候了。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 红米 13C 没有 5G 功能

小米红米 13C 是一款 LTE 手机,因此无法使用 5G 网络。在进行测试的中欧地区,支持的 4G 频率是足够的,但如果你想在旅行中使用这款手机,那么你可能需要提前研究一下这款手机能否在你的目标国家接入 LTE 网络。

在测试期间,手机显示了良好的信号质量,但高端手机如 iPhone 15等高端手机仍能提供更好的信号,并能在非常偏远的地区创建信号(尽管信号很弱),而红米 13C 却无法在这些地区找到信号。

红米 13C 支持 WiFi 5 作为手机最快的无线局域网标准,在我们的测试中,红米 13C 与华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 参考路由器配合使用,能够很好地使用 WiFi 5:红米 13C 的传输非常稳定,速度与配置类似的设备相当。数据传输速率在 300 到 350 MBit/s 之间,这意味着无法充分利用千兆网线,但对于没有大量下载的日常使用来说,手机的传输速度绝对够快。

在靠近路由器的地方,您可以获得完整的接收信号,网站加载速度也比较快。在距离路由器 10 米远的地方,中间有三面墙,手机的信号强度就会下降到 50%,加载网页的时间也会明显延长。

Networking
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
iperf3 receive AXE11000
309 (min: 276) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
365 (min: 346) MBit/s ∼50%
Xiaomi Redmi 12C
iperf3 receive AXE11000
280 (min: 174) MBit/s ∼39%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
367 (min: 345) MBit/s ∼50%
Motorola Moto G14
iperf3 receive AXE11000
323 (min: 286) MBit/s ∼45%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
365 (min: 349) MBit/s ∼50%
Nokia G11 Plus
iperf3 receive AXE11000
313 (min: 243) MBit/s ∼44%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
363 (min: 242) MBit/s ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
iperf3 receive AXE11000
337 (min: 68) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
365 (min: 331) MBit/s ∼50%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
714 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
729 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼100%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi 13C; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø308 (276-335)
Xiaomi Redmi 13C; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø365 (346-378)
外部 GPS 测试
外部 GPS 测试
可用的卫星网络
可用的卫星网络

为了确定您的位置,智能手机支持包括 SBAS 在内的所有主要卫星网络,以实现更精确的定位。这也解释了为什么我们注意到在室外仅有一米的极低偏差。

小米红米 13C 在实际定位测试中也表现出色:我们去骑自行车旅行,带上 Garmin Venu 2 智能手表进行比较。红米手机非常准确地记录了我们的路线,没有出现任何重大偏差:例如,在过桥时,它没有准确显示我们所处道路的正确一侧。

总之,我们可以放心地推荐这款手机用于导航,即使你有相当高的要求。

小米红米 13C 定位服务 - 概述
小米红米 13C 定位服务 - 概述
小米红米 13C 定位服务--转折点
小米红米 13C 定位服务--转折点
小米红米 13C 定位服务 - 桥接
小米红米 13C 定位服务 - 桥接
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 转折点
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 转折点
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 桥接
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 桥接

电话功能和通话质量 - 音质有待提高

小米红米 13C 使用的是谷歌的电话应用程序,很多其他智能手机制造商的用户对此应该不会感到陌生。当然,你也可以从谷歌应用商店下载其他电话应用程序,只是在选择开发商时要慎重。

我们还测试了这款手机的通话质量,使用多种设置进行了多次通话。我们注意到,通话另一端的人往往听起来不清晰--无论是将手机举到耳边,还是使用扬声器模式将声音调到最大:声音被过度调制,感觉对方并不存在,而是像普通电话一样遥远。

不过,我们的声音传输得比较清晰,只是必须确保说话的声音足够大,否则麦克风无法捕捉到任何噪音。

摄像头 - 清晰的图像质量

使用前置摄像头拍摄的照片
使用前置摄像头拍摄的照片

红米 13C 的背面配备了分辨率为 5000 万像素的主摄像头和一个低像素微距镜头,可用于超近距离拍摄。微距镜头可以通过特殊模式使用--然后它就能生成可用的图像。

我们更喜欢用手机主摄像头拍摄的照片。虽然主摄像头大多没有使用 5000 万像素,而是拍摄标准的 1250 万像素照片,但更大的像点至少能确保它捕捉到更多光线。如果需要,你可以在相机软件中选择一个特殊模式,使用镜头的全分辨率拍摄照片。

对于如此廉价的智能手机来说,主摄像头的照片实际上显示出了不错的细节、可用的锐度和良好的色彩描绘。但仔细观察,高端手机拍摄的照片细节更丰富,清晰度更高,但就红米 13C 的价格而言,其主摄像头在光线充足的条件下拍摄的照片还算不错。在对比度较高的弱光条件下,其动态范围较差。亮部往往曝光过度,暗部则失去任何清晰度。

使用主摄像头可录制视频,最高分辨率为 1080p,每秒 30 帧。它的自动对焦和光照调节需要一些时间来反应,但总的来说,你可以拍摄出不错的视频。

800 万像素自拍摄像头位于屏幕顶部边缘的水滴形凹槽内。即使在光线条件良好的情况下,它也能拍摄出颗粒感很强的照片。不过,在光线较暗的地方,它的图像动态效果还是不错的。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera plantMain camera surroundingsMain camera low light
orginal image
click to load images

这款相机还必须在我们的照片实验室中证明自己的价值。在这里,我们可以精确调节照明条件,从而更好地比较各个相机。即使在良好的照明条件下,测试图的对比度也不高,但色彩表现尚可。图像边缘的锐度明显下降。

在仅有 1 勒克斯的照明条件下,小米手机拍摄的照片几乎无法辨认出任何东西。

ColorChecker
4.2 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
0.9 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
7 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
5 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
3 ∆E
4 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi 13C: 4.13 ∆E min: 0.87 - max: 8.8 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.4 ∆E
54.5 ∆E
39.1 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
44.7 ∆E
63.3 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
35.7 ∆E
43.4 ∆E
28 ∆E
65.8 ∆E
64.3 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
37.6 ∆E
76.8 ∆E
43.5 ∆E
43.6 ∆E
92.9 ∆E
70.6 ∆E
52 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi 13C: 47.02 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 92.94 ∆E

配件和保修 - 不含充电器

小米红米 13C 的购买者不应该指望手机会附带很多配件:包装盒中只有一根 USB 数据线和一个 SIM 卡工具,没有电源和硅胶防撞条也没关系。

相应的充电器可以在小米的网上商店以相当便宜的价格买到。不过,制造商并没有专门为这款智能手机提供任何特殊配件。尽管如此,你还是可以在亚马逊等网站上找到大量第三方配件。

关于保修信息,制造商表示应以当地法律为准。

输入设备和操作 - 小米手机上的快速指纹传感器

小米的键盘也使用标准的Android 应用程序。如果需要,还可以轻松下载其他键盘,并将其设置为设备的标准键盘。

触摸屏的扫描速度高达每秒 180 次,可精确操作。边角输入都能快速识别和执行。

指纹传感器位于手机外壳右侧的待机键内。一旦保存了指纹,它就能可靠地识别指纹,并在您触摸手机时立即解锁。

您还可以通过面部识别来解锁设备,在光线充足的条件下,面部识别也能快速、可靠地工作。

直立式键盘
直立式键盘
水平键盘
水平键盘

显示屏--像素较低的 IPS 显示屏

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

小米红米 13C 配备了一块对角线为 6.74 英寸的 IPS 屏幕,因此比上一代产品稍大一些。此外,该屏幕的最高刷新率仅为 90 Hz,你可以在 60 和 90 Hz 之间手动选择,也可以让系统根据情况自动调节。它的屏幕亮度略有提升,达到了 424 cd/m²,亮度也更加均匀。

与同类产品相比,红米 13C 的显示效果也不错。不过,我们有一个问题需要注意:是的,720p 屏幕在 200 美元以下的手机中并不是完全不常见,但如今全高清显示屏的机型已经足够多了。在显示效果上的差异是显而易见的,因为边缘看起来并不那么整洁,而且总的来说,画面看起来并不像更高像素的屏幕那样清晰。

好的一面是,显示屏的黑度值相对较低,因此色彩不会显得过于苍白。

428
cd/m²
424
cd/m²
415
cd/m²
430
cd/m²
430
cd/m²
403
cd/m²
433
cd/m²
440
cd/m²
413
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 440 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 424 cd/m² Minimum: 2.7 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 430 cd/m²
Contrast: 1536:1 (Black: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.06 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.35
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
IPS, 1600x720, 6.7"
Xiaomi Redmi 12C
IPS, 1650x720, 6.7"
Motorola Moto G14
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.5"
Nokia G11 Plus
IPS, 1600x720, 6.5"
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
PLS, 2408x1080, 6.6"
Screen
-6%
-8%
-23%
-54%
Brightness middle
430
417
-3%
486
13%
395
-8%
465
8%
Brightness
424
397
-6%
478
13%
385
-9%
439
4%
Brightness Distribution
92
85
-8%
92
0%
94
2%
89
-3%
Black Level *
0.28
0.35
-25%
0.45
-61%
0.3
-7%
0.47
-68%
Contrast
1536
1191
-22%
1080
-30%
1317
-14%
989
-36%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.06
3.81
6%
4.68
-15%
6.21
-53%
8.5
-109%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.11
7.2
11%
7.33
10%
10.61
-31%
15.8
-95%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5
5.2
-4%
4.8
4%
8.3
-66%
11.8
-136%
Gamma
2.35 94%
2.531 87%
2.29 96%
2.639 83%
2.2 100%
CCT
7813 83%
7842 83%
7691 85%
7999 81%
10757 60%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在我们使用光谱光度计和 CalMAN 软件进行的测试中,我们注意到显示屏有轻微的蓝色色调,而且不少颜色出现了偏差。总之,对于这样一款廉价手机来说,它的显示效果还是相当成功的,这意味着你仍然可以看到比较自然的色彩。

我们没有注意到显示屏上有任何 PWM 闪烁。

卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN sRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN sRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN DCI P3 色彩空间
CalMAN DCI P3 色彩空间
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 饱和度

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
29.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14.4 ms rise
↘ 14.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 23.1 ms rise
↘ 20.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

你完全可以在室外有遮阳的地方使用手机,但即使在阴天,你也会开始注意到恼人的反光,显示屏的亮度太低根本无法与之抗衡。

如果从侧面观看屏幕,你可能会看到一些轻微的亮度变化,但总的来说,应该不会太明显。

室外使用
室外使用
视角
视角

性能 - 与同价位产品相比,动力强劲

红米 13C 依靠 联发科 Helio G85作为 SoC,这在前代机型中已经使用过。因此,在这方面很难说有什么创新,但在我们的基准测试中,这并不是一个大问题,因为该处理器在同价位产品中表现出色:很多时候,该系统都领先于同价位的智能手机,虽然其 20% 左右的领先优势并不明显,但绝对值得注意。

这意味着你可以很好地浏览手机菜单,但在运行要求较高的应用程序时,也不能完全排除延迟和不必要的等待时间。

一个有趣的现象是,SoC 对人工智能计算的理解能力相当不错,因此与其他入门级智能手机相比,相应的功能也得到了加速。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=176, last 2 years)
1037 Points +137%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
437 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (341 - 437, n=15)
358 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
350 Points -20%
Motorola Moto G14
Unisoc T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
347 Points -21%
Nokia G11 Plus
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
308 Points -30%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=176, last 2 years)
3464 Points +161%
Motorola Moto G14
Unisoc T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1471 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1334 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1329 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1184 - 1456, n=15)
1321 Points -1%
Nokia G11 Plus
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
1202 Points -10%
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=171, last 2 years)
1491 Points +307%
Motorola Moto G14
Unisoc T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
428 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
413 Points +13%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (366 - 416, n=4)
399 Points +9%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
366 Points
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=171, last 2 years)
4177 Points +217%
Motorola Moto G14
Unisoc T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1548 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1384 Points +5%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1251 - 1449, n=4)
1360 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1316 Points
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 2056989, n=104, last 2 years)
810694 Points +273%
Motorola Moto G14
Unisoc T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
228124 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
217448 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (191865 - 231224, n=3)
213512 Points -2%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years)
13179 Points +41%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9338 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 12C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
8450 Points -10%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (6596 - 9437, n=13)
8122 Points -13%
Motorola Moto G14
Unisoc T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
8030 Points -14%
Nokia G11 Plus
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
7562 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
5720 Points -39%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2485, n=164, last 2 years)
920 Points +149%
Motorola Moto G14
Unisoc T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
394 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
369 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
348 Points -6%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (280 - 386, n=4)
340 Points -8%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 12993, n=158, last 2 years)
6499 Points +168%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2422 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (2138 - 2422, n=6)
2286 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2226 Points -8%
Motorola Moto G14
Unisoc T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
2046 Points -16%
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 17953, n=158, last 2 years)
10346 Points +124%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
5104 Points +11%
Motorola Moto G14
Unisoc T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
4795 Points +4%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (4353 - 5010, n=6)
4674 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4610 Points
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 18911, n=158, last 2 years)
7058 Points +105%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3437 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (2536 - 3437, n=6)
2874 Points -16%
Motorola Moto G14
Unisoc T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
2841 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2650 Points -23%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=158, last 2 years)
17998 Points +818%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1960 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1810 - 1960, n=6)
1852 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1811 Points -8%
Motorola Moto G14
Unisoc T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1173 Points -40%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=158, last 2 years)
1578 Points +42%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1028 - 1198, n=6)
1130 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1109 Points
Motorola Moto G14
Unisoc T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1096 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1002 Points -10%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=150, last 2 years)
17814 Points +248%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
5112 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (3849 - 5112, n=3)
4287 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3630 Points -29%
Motorola Moto G14
Unisoc T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
2966 Points -42%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=143, last 2 years)
25319 Points +3129%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
784 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  ()
784 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
780 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G14
Unisoc T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
298 Points -62%

图形基准测试表明,你不能对价格低廉的红米 13C 抱有太高期望:即使在显示屏的原生分辨率下,要求稍高的基准测试的运行速度也大大低于 30fps 的流畅度。在更高分辨率下,应用程序的运行速度非常缓慢。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
188 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 12C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
186 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
178 Points -5%
Motorola Moto G14
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
126 Points -33%
Nokia G11 Plus
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
115 Points -39%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
190 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 12C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
188 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
179 Points -6%
Motorola Moto G14
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
127 Points -33%
Nokia G11 Plus
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
110 Points -42%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
750 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 12C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
735 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
716 Points -5%
Motorola Moto G14
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
478 Points -36%
Nokia G11 Plus
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
403 Points -46%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
742 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 12C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
733 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
706 Points -5%
Motorola Moto G14
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
475 Points -36%
Nokia G11 Plus
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
404 Points -46%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Motorola Moto G14
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2502 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2410 Points +11%
Nokia G11 Plus
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
2354 Points +8%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2178 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1292 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1139 Points -12%
Motorola Moto G14
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
940 Points -27%
Nokia G11 Plus
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
834 Points -35%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1420 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1290 Points -9%
Motorola Moto G14
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1091 Points -23%
Nokia G11 Plus
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
974 Points -31%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Motorola Moto G14
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2956 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2753 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2694 Points -2%
Nokia G11 Plus
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
2687 Points -2%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1268 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1178 Points -7%
Motorola Moto G14
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
940 Points -26%
Nokia G11 Plus
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
821 Points -35%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1441 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1346 Points -7%
Motorola Moto G14
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1108 Points -23%
Nokia G11 Plus
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
971 Points -33%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 12C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
55 fps +2%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
54 fps
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
37 fps -31%
Motorola Moto G14
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps -57%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 12C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
46 fps +5%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
44 fps
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
41 fps -7%
Motorola Moto G14
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps -43%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Redmi 12C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
55 fps +28%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
43 fps
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
22 fps -49%
Motorola Moto G14
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps -65%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 12C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
26 fps +4%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
25 fps
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
23 fps -8%
Motorola Moto G14
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps -36%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 12C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
30 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
30 fps
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
13 fps -57%
Motorola Moto G14
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.9 fps -70%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 12C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
16 fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps
Motorola Moto G14
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.9 fps -34%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 12C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
17 fps +6%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
16 fps
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7.6 fps -52%
Motorola Moto G14
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.1 fps -68%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 12C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
10 fps +10%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
9.1 fps
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
9 fps -1%
Motorola Moto G14
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6 fps -34%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 12C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
9.3 fps +9%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
8.5 fps
Nokia G11 Plus
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
6.5 fps -24%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4.8 fps -44%
Motorola Moto G14
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.5 fps -59%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 12C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
3.5 fps +3%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
3.4 fps
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3.2 fps -6%
Motorola Moto G14
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.2 fps -35%
Nokia G11 Plus
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
2 fps -41%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 12C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
17 fps +6%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
16 fps
Nokia G11 Plus
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
10 fps -37%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7.5 fps -53%
Motorola Moto G14
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.5 fps -66%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 12C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
9.5 fps +7%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
8.9 fps
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.5 fps -4%
Motorola Moto G14
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.2 fps -30%
Nokia G11 Plus
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
5.5 fps -38%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 12C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1.5 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1.5 fps
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1.4 fps -7%
Motorola Moto G14
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
0.97 fps -35%
Nokia G11 Plus
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
0.8 fps -47%

事实证明,与其他同价位的设备相比,它的网络浏览器性能略胜一筹。网站的加载速度相对较快,而图片的加载则需要等待很长时间。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)
124.4 Points +136%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C (Chrome 121)
52.776 Points
Motorola Moto G14 (Chrome 115)
47.777 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE (Chrome 114)
40.02 Points -24%
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (29.2 - 52.8, n=7)
36.7 Points -30%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)
143.9 runs/min +254%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C (Chrome 121)
40.6 runs/min
Motorola Moto G14 (Chrome 115)
36.1 runs/min -11%
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (27 - 48.6, n=6)
33.3 runs/min -18%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE (Chrome 114)
32 runs/min -21%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years)
117.1 Points +130%
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (51 - 59, n=2)
55 Points +8%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C (Chrome 121)
51 Points
Motorola Moto G14
45 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE (Chrome 114)
44 Points -14%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)
38550 Points +176%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C (Chrome 121)
13977 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (10299 - 15430, n=13)
12768 Points -9%
Motorola Moto G14 (Chrome 115)
12141 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE (Chrome 114)
11782 Points -16%
Xiaomi Redmi 12C (Chrome 112)
11406 Points -18%
Nokia G11 Plus (Chrome 114)
10596 Points -24%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (2742 - 3939, n=7)
3422 ms * -15%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE (Chrome 114)
3347 ms * -13%
Motorola Moto G14 (Chrome 115)
3013.8 ms * -2%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C (Chrome 121)
2966.5 ms *
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)
1523 ms * +49%

* ... smaller is better

制造商对手机的存储空间考虑不多:它只安装了速度较慢的 eMMC 闪存。摩托罗拉表明,即使是如此廉价的智能手机,也可以期待更快的 UFS 存储。

因此,红米 13C 的加载时间偶尔会延长。

Xiaomi Redmi 13CXiaomi Redmi 12CMotorola Moto G14Nokia G11 PlusSamsung Galaxy A14 LTEAverage 128 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
10%
158%
-14%
-21%
-17%
399%
Sequential Read 256KB
300.2
290.6
-3%
888.6
196%
270.6
-10%
298.69
-1%
Sequential Write 256KB
179.4
225.1
25%
538.1
200%
196
9%
200.17
12%
Random Read 4KB
101.5
112.9
11%
221.3
118%
81.5
-20%
55.9
-45%
82.7 ?(8.63 - 247, n=77)
-19%
Random Write 4KB
114.8
123.7
8%
251.7
119%
77.1
-33%
55.86
-51%
Xiaomi Redmi 13CAverage 128 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
PCMark for Android
-18%
291%
Storage 2.0 seq. read int.
278 ?(3.0.4061)
218 ?(99.2 - 284, n=9)
-22%
Storage 2.0 seq. write int.
199.8 ?(3.0.4061)
176.3 ?(81.3 - 240, n=9)
-12%
Storage 2.0 random read int.
27.4 ?(3.0.4061)
Storage 2.0 random write int.
32.5 ?(3.0.4061)
26.3 ?(1.09 - 49.1, n=9)
-19%
Storage 2.0
11998 ?(3.0.4061)
10740 ?(2565 - 17319, n=14)
-10%

游戏 - 非游戏专用

游戏并不一定是小米红米 13C 的强项。虽然运行简单的休闲游戏没有任何问题,但《源氏冲击》或《PUBG Mobile》等要求较高的游戏表明,你只能使用低设置。即便如此,超流畅的 60fps 也是遥遥无期。

在高设置下,这些游戏可能仍然可以玩,但由于它们的延迟太严重,可能不会非常有趣。我们使用GameBench 软件测试了帧速率。

在我们的测试中,通过触摸屏和位置传感器(取决于游戏)操作手机完全正常。

源泉冲击
源泉冲击
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
0510152025303540Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi 13C; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 4.4.0_20481013_20559831: Ø26.4 (18-35)
Xiaomi Redmi 13C; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 4.4.0_20481013_20559831: Ø15 (11-19)
Xiaomi Redmi 13C; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.0.0: Ø39.2 (35-41)
Xiaomi Redmi 13C; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.0.0: Ø28.6 (6-32)

排放 - 明显变暖

温度

在长时间使用后,我们测得手机表面温度高达 45.3 °C。这一点非常明显,有时可能会让人感觉不舒服--更何况我们是在室温下进行测量的,这意味着在大热天设备的温度可能会更高。

尽管如此,它的性能几乎没有受到影响:即使在运行了 20 次 3DMark Wild Life 或 Wild Life Extreme 之后,我们测得的帧速率也与测试开始时相差无几。

Max. Load
 43.7 °C36.8 °C35.1 °C 
 43.4 °C36.5 °C35.1 °C 
 42 °C37 °C35.1 °C 
Maximum: 43.7 °C
Average: 38.3 °C
34.4 °C38.2 °C41.5 °C
34.4 °C39.5 °C45.3 °C
35.2 °C40.1 °C44.4 °C
Maximum: 45.3 °C
Average: 39.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42.8 °C | Room Temperature 20.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.3 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.7 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.3 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Redmi 12C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
98.8 % +2%
Motorola Moto G14
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.5 % +1%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
97.1 %
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
96.4 % -1%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
96.4 % -1%
Nokia G11 Plus
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
95.4 % -2%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
97.9 %
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
95.6 % -2%
00.20.50.70.91.11.41.61.822.32.52.733.23.43.63.94.14.3Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi 13C Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø1.142 (1.129-1.153)
Xiaomi Redmi 13C Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.5 (4.41-4.54)
Xiaomi Redmi 12C Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.44 (4.4-4.46)
Motorola Moto G14 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.84 (2.81-2.85)
Nokia G11 Plus Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.46 (2.4-2.52)
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.29 (4.15-4.31)
正面热图
正面热图
热图返回
热图返回

发言人

底部边缘的扬声器是红米 13C 唯一的扬声器,因此你只能使用单声道音效。扬声器的音量一般,即使在最大音量时也不会失真。不过,由于几乎听不到中低音,它很难给声音带来温暖感。

对于听音乐或看电影,扬声器应该足够了,但通过 3.5 毫米插孔或蓝牙连接的大多数外置音频设备的声音会更好。几乎所有当前流行的编解码器都可用于音频传输,包括 aptX TWS+ 和 LHDC V5。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.2432530.335.93124.126.64031.431.65037.334.96325.924.88019.517.610016.515.812513.715.516013.721.42009.2282508.337.33156.744.7400753.15008.857.56308.3638008.967.7100010.772.812508.770.316009.169.120009.766.9250010.663.9315011.361.740001269.5500012.971.9630013.771.6800014.4681000015.365.9125001669.4160001758SPL23.980.8N0.546.6median 10.7median 63.9Delta2.713.135.938.526.230.929.430.528.731.836.640.52235.819.733.417.936.218.538.417.742.215.143.815.545.616.550.21354.813.459.514.262.81366.312.870.613.874.713.777.113.679.213.279.6148213.582.913.679.713.978.313.679.413.679.713.869.313.158.225.890.70.778.5median 13.7median 70.60.813.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi 13CSamsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi 13C audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 36.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 适合日常使用的运行时间

耗电量

小米红米 13C 并不是省电神器,但即便如此,它的能耗也并不比同价位的智能手机高。此外,它的能耗值甚至比 三星Galaxy A14 LTE的能耗值低得多。

从零开始为设备充满电大约需要两个小时。红米 13C 没有配备充电器,在我们的测试中,它与所有的充电器都不太兼容:我们的Apple 充电器能激活 Quick Charge,而Honor 的充电器不能,尽管它们都能提供相同的电量。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.4 / 1.8 Watt
Load midlight 3.8 / 6.7 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G41
5000 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio G85
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-20%
4%
-8%
-22%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
0.89
1%
0.9
-0%
0.949 ?(0.7 - 1.7, n=7)
-5%
Idle Average *
1.4
2.31
-65%
1.1
21%
1.567 ?(0.9 - 2.9, n=7)
-12%
Idle Maximum *
1.8
2.34
-30%
1.6
11%
1.957 ?(1.3 - 3, n=7)
-9%
Load Average *
3.8
4.11
-8%
4.3
-13%
4.22 ?(3.5 - 5.3, n=7)
-11%
Load Maximum *
6.7
6.46
4%
6.5
3%
6.94 ?(6.11 - 8.5, n=7)
-4%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi 13C; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.49 (1.063-6.67)
Xiaomi Redmi 13C; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.208 (1.037-1.823)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.40.60.70.91.11.31.51.71.922.22.42.62.833.23.33.5Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi 13C; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.37 (2.88-3.71)
Xiaomi Redmi 13C; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.208 (1.037-1.823)

运行时间

小米红米 13C 配备了 5,000 毫安时电池,与其他手机的电池容量相当:许多其他智能手机都配备了类似大小的电池。

小米从这块电池中获得的续航时间一般都不错,但绝不会打破任何新纪录:我们在 WLAN 测试中测得的 15:48 小时续航时间,在重新连接充电器之前应该足够使用两天。在重新连接插座之前,您可以在满电状态下使用手机 5:36 小时。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
35h 43min
WiFi Websurfing
15h 48min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
22h 27min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 36min
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 12C
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G14
5000 mAh
Nokia G11 Plus
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-2%
5%
9%
-17%
Reader / Idle
2143
1170
-45%
H.264
1347
1044
-22%
WiFi v1.3
948
933
-2%
995
5%
1038
9%
896
-5%
Load
336
348
4%

Pros

+ 光滑外壳
+ 无 PWM
+ Widevine L1
+ 承诺 4 年更新
+ 精确定位服务
+ 负载下无节流
+ 现代蓝牙音频编解码器

Cons

- 无 5G
- 通话质量差
- 屏幕分辨率低
- 手机不带电源
- 存储速度慢

结论:一款现代化的 4G 手机,价格远低于 200 美元

小米红米 13C 评测。测试设备由提供:
小米红米 13C 评测。测试设备由提供:
cyberport.de

说到红米 13C,小米已经做足了功课,在许多方面都比上一代智能手机有所改进:最大的变化是它的新设计,给人的感觉更加时尚和高品质。当然,它仍然是塑料外壳,但做工精良,稳定性极佳。

此外,我们还对该手机良好的运行时间和精确的定位服务感到非常满意,即使在细节方面也没有太多不足之处。如此大容量的存储空间在这个价位的手机中也并不常见。

该手机的摄像头还算可用,但作为该级别手机的典型代表,摄影爱好者不会对其着迷。这款手机的扬声器也是如此--你不应该对它抱有过高的期望,但如果你选择连接蓝牙耳机,就可以使用多种音频编解码器。

对于这款手机的下一代产品,小米确实应该再接再厉,安装更高分辨率的屏幕。此外,如果手机在交付时能再附带一个充电器就更好了。

小米红米 13C 是一款经济实惠的现代智能手机。它拥有承诺的更新、大量存储空间和良好的定位服务。

快速浏览一下替代产品:三星 三星Galaxy A14 LTE三星 A14 LTE 也承诺进行多年更新,而且还配备了不错的摄像头。不过,如果您选择这款手机,您将不得不忍受较低的性能。摩托罗拉 摩托罗拉 Moto G14还提供大量存储空间,甚至配备了立体声扬声器。

价格和供应情况

小米红米 13C 目前在亚马逊上的售价为124 美元

Xiaomi Redmi 13C - 03/04/2024 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
83%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
48 / 70 → 69%
Weight
89%
Battery
92%
Display
85%
Games Performance
16 / 64 → 24%
Application Performance
65 / 86 → 76%
Temperature
89%
Noise
100%
Audio
66 / 90 → 73%
Camera
52%
Average
72%
78%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 小米红米 13C 智能手机评测--设计新颖、存储容量大的廉价手机
Florian Schmitt, 2024-03- 6 (Update: 2024-08-15)