摩托罗拉 Moto G05 智能手机评测--配备 5000 万像素摄像头的最具吸引力的经济型手机
人造皮革专家
你不想让自己的智能手机价格太高，但又希望它外观漂亮？摩托罗拉 Moto G05 的售价仅为 100 多美元，但却拥有漂亮的仿皮机背和 5000 万像素摄像头。省钱达人的最佳选择？Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
对摩托罗拉 Moto G05 的评价
摩托罗拉 Moto G05 为您提供了日常使用所需的一切。它的设计、快速的指纹传感器、质量不错的主摄像头以及合理的扬声器音效都给人带来了惊喜。
不过，你不应该对它的性能抱太高的期望，偶尔的卡顿和等待时间也会让你难以忍受。不过，更糟糕的是它没有 NFC 功能，这意味着你无法使用流行的谷歌支付功能。
这款手机的屏幕足够亮，其 SoC 在长时间负载下也不会出现节流现象，发热量也不会太高，电池续航时间在大多数情况下足够使用一天。
总之，如果你能接受没有 NFC 功能，Moto G05 是一款极具吸引力、值得推荐的经济型手机。
另一个建议：市场上还有 128 或 256 GB 大容量存储的机型。如果您只需支付少量的附加费就能买到，那就应该选择它，因为我们测试设备的 64 GB 容量非常有限。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
摩托罗拉 Moto G05 尚未在美国发售。据估计，它的最高售价约为 140 美元。
可能的替代品比较
规格
外壳和连接性 - Moto G05 的外壳极具吸引力
Moto G05 的外壳给人留下了非常好的印象。这要归功于摩托罗拉当前的设计语言，它将棱角分明的外形与圆润的边角相结合，并以巧妙的曲线将上部的摄像头模块整合在一起。
黑色智能手机的粉丝们可能不会最高兴：在进行测试的中欧地区，目前只有森林绿和梅子红两种颜色可供选择，其中略带蓝光的绿色更为柔和。手机外壳非常坚固，189 克的重量略高于制造商生产的同尺寸智能手机。
手机外壳具有 IP54 级防水和防尘保护，但不能将智能手机完全浸入水中。屏幕由大猩猩 3 号玻璃保护。
我们测试设备的 64 GB 大容量存储空间有限，但在互联网上也能找到 128 GB 或 256 GB（甚至 8 GB 内存）的版本，而且几乎无需额外费用。您可以通过 microSD 扩展存储空间，而且读卡器整体运行速度很快。
遗憾的是，摩托罗拉没有安装 NFC，因此无法将手机用作移动支付工具。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Motorola Moto G24 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Motorola Moto G05 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 14C (Angelbird V60) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (7.7 - 77, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto G04 | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信和操作 - 无 NFC 功能的 4G 手机
摩托罗拉 G05 是一款 4G 手机，我们的机型支持在欧洲使用的足够频率。在全球旅行时，您应检查是否支持目的地国家所需的频段。
最后，它支持带有多根天线的 WiFi 5，速度约为 300 MBit/s。Moto G05 能跟上对比设备的速度，但在同价位产品中并不能提供最高速度。在使用华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 作为参考路由器进行的测试中，我们甚至发现数据传输速率时不时会出现可重现的下降。
待机键位于机身右侧，并集成了指纹传感器。它工作可靠、快速。此外，还可以使用面部识别技术解锁设备，该技术同样可靠，但不太安全。
软件和可持续性 - 2 年更新
摩托罗拉 Moto G05 预装了Android 15。制造商承诺在 2026 年 12 月之前提供安全更新。对于这种廉价智能手机来说，长时间的更新并不常见，但考虑到该设备的可持续性，这仍然是一个遗憾。在此之后，Google Play 系统级更新仍有可能进行，并提供最低程度的安全保障。目前还不知道这款智能手机是否会有新的操作系统版本。
一些预装的赞助应用程序是不可避免的，但除此之外，操作系统非常接近纯粹的Android 。
在可持续发展方面，没有关于该设备的二氧化碳排放量或所使用材料的信息。值得庆幸的是，包装盒只用一种颜色印刷，使用的是大豆油油墨。
相机 - 出乎意料的好
背面的主摄像头分辨率为 5000 万像素，但通常只能拍摄四分之一的照片，即 1250 万像素，因为四个像素组合在一起才能获得更高的亮度。有一种特殊模式可让您使用全分辨率。
对于这样一款价格实惠的手机来说，这款相机的拍照效果还算不错，但细节不如高端手机。不过，只要不过分放大，还是没问题的。在弱光环境下，照片细节出奇地多，但在暗处，亮度明显不足。
分辨率为 800 万像素的前置摄像头自拍效果不错，但往往有点偏蓝，对明亮的物体曝光过度。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera plantMain camera surroundingsMain camera low light
显示屏 - 不太明亮
IPS 屏幕的分辨率为 1,612 x 720 像素，帧频高达 90 Hz。
它的最大亮度为 370 cd/m²，略低于其他设备。在户外明亮的日子里，这个亮度往往不足以看清屏幕上的内容。
另一方面，在 "自然 "模式下，它的色彩还原相当准确。
我们没有注意到任何 PWM 闪烁。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 370 cd/m²
Contrast: 1542:1 (Black: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.09 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.89
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
98.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.317
| Motorola Moto G05 IPS, 1612x720, 6.6" | Motorola Moto G04 IPS, 1612x720, 6.6" | Xiaomi Redmi 14C IPS, 1640x720, 6.9" | Motorola Moto G24 IPS, 1612x720, 6.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -31% | -19% | -47% | |
| Brightness middle | 370 | 414 12% | 422 14% | 521 41% |
| Brightness | 358 | 396 11% | 401 12% | 510 42% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 91 -1% | 89 -3% | 93 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.24 | 0.34 -42% | 0.3 -25% | 0.39 -63% |
| Contrast | 1542 | 1218 -21% | 1407 -9% | 1336 -13% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.09 | 3.26 -56% | 3.21 -54% | 4.83 -131% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.49 | 6.74 -23% | 6.29 -15% | 7.71 -40% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 3.9 -129% | 2.9 -71% | 5.3 -212% |
| Gamma | 2.317 95% | 2.075 106% | 2.382 92% | 2.111 104% |
| CCT | 6405 101% | 6914 94% | 6338 103% | 7021 93% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8580 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13.7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 75 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 42.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23.5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.6 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池寿命 - 性能一般，耐力良好
与前代产品相比 摩托 G04，Moto G05 的全新联发科 Helio G81 SoC 在性能上并没有显著提升。它的基准测试结果整体上看起来很相似。不过，Moto G05 的性能值更加稳定，而其前代产品则出现了一些下滑。
我们测试设备的运行速度在同类产品中并不算高：例如，在设置中进行搜索查询往往要花费一些时间，日常使用中的卡顿也不是完全可以避免的。不过，对于编写信息或上网冲浪等简单任务来说，它的功率还是足够的。
在长时间负载的情况下，手机外壳几乎不会发热，而且在我们的测试中，在多次重复基准测试后，其性能仍然保持不变。
设备底部边缘的小型扬声器由听筒支持，在横向模式下可产生轻微的立体声效果。扬声器足够强大，即使在最大音量时声音也相当清晰。它们的声音缺乏中低音，但在其他方面还算不错。
外部音频设备可通过 3.5 毫米插孔或蓝牙连接。无线传输支持大量编解码器，包括 LDAC 或 aptX HD 等高保真选项。
摩托罗拉手机的电池容量为 5,200 毫安时，比上一代产品略大，因此在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中，运行时间延长了一小时。摩托罗拉手机的电池很容易满足一天的正常使用。
手机充电功率可达 18 瓦，但不包括充电器。使用我们的充电器，从 0% 充至 100%，大约需要 1:45 小时。
| PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 27169, n=194, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto G05 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G81 (n=1) | |
| Motorola Moto G24 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 14C | |
| Motorola Moto G04 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=208, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto G05 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G81 (n=1) | |
| Motorola Moto G24 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 14C | |
| Motorola Moto G04 | |
| Geekbench AI | |
| Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (51 - 1501, n=30, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto G05 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G81 (n=1) | |
| Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (51 - 9453, n=30, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto G05 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G81 (n=1) | |
| Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (123 - 13084, n=30, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto G05 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G81 (n=1) | |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.3 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.2 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad stress test
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Motorola Moto G05 | |
| Motorola Moto G24 | |
| Motorola Moto G04 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 14C | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Motorola Moto G05 | |
| Motorola Moto G24 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 14C | |
Motorola Moto G05 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Motorola Moto G24 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Motorola Moto G05 5200 mAh | Motorola Moto G04 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi 14C 5160 mAh | Motorola Moto G24 5000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 973 | 907 -7% | 976 0% | 969 0% |
Notebookcheck 总评分
Moto G05 是一款非常经济实惠的智能手机，外壳精美、质量上乘。
不过，它缺乏 NFC 功能令人讨厌，因为这意味着你无法使用流行的谷歌支付（Google Pay）。
Motorola Moto G05
- 03/13/2025 v8
Florian Schmitt
Total Sustainability Score: Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
