摩托罗拉 Moto G34 5G 智能手机评测--为省钱的人设计的手机,不想没有它
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
81.9 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | Motorola Moto G34 SD 695 5G, Adreno 619 | 179 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
79 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | Motorola Moto G23 Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2 | 184.3 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
80.2 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G SD 685, Adreno 610 | 188.5 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
75.9 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2 | 201 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.60" | 2408x1080 | |
74.6 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | Honor X7a Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320 | 196 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.74" | 1600x720 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
尺寸比较
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Motorola Moto G34 (Angelbird V60) | |
Honor X7a (Angelbird V60) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Angelbird V60) | |
Motorola Moto G23 (Angelbird V60) |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
Networking | |
Motorola Moto G34 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Motorola Moto G23 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Honor X7a | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Average of class Smartphone | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera plantMain camera landscapeMain camera low light
|
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 523 cd/m²
Contrast: 1113:1 (Black: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.89 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
90.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.262
Motorola Moto G34 IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | Motorola Moto G23 IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE PLS, 2408x1080, 6.6" | Honor X7a IPS, 1600x720, 6.7" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -38% | 51% | -114% | -14% | |
Brightness middle | 523 | 522 0% | 940 80% | 465 -11% | 586 12% |
Brightness | 512 | 502 -2% | 922 80% | 439 -14% | 562 10% |
Brightness Distribution | 95 | 91 -4% | 96 1% | 89 -6% | 91 -4% |
Black Level * | 0.47 | 0.47 -0% | 0.47 -0% | 0.26 45% | |
Contrast | 1113 | 1111 0% | 989 -11% | 2254 103% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.89 | 4.63 -145% | 1.2 37% | 8.5 -350% | 4.24 -124% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.63 | 8.59 -86% | 2.28 51% | 15.8 -241% | 8.44 -82% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.1 | 5.2 -68% | 1.4 55% | 11.8 -281% | 5.3 -71% |
Gamma | 2.262 97% | 2.296 96% | 2.27 97% | 2.2 100% | 2.226 99% |
CCT | 6471 100% | 7832 83% | 6503 100% | 10757 60% | 6955 93% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
25.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.7 ms rise | |
↘ 11.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
71.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 48 ms rise | |
↘ 23.3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 99 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Antutu v9 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (99654 - 1650926, n=104, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Moto G34 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (344344 - 416086, n=18) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G |
CrossMark - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 1517, n=157, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Moto G34 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (521 - 606, n=18) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G | |
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE |
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 74958, n=143, last 2 years) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (5442 - 9348, n=15) | |
Motorola Moto G34 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G | |
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE |
AImark - Score v3.x | |
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 307528, n=135, last 2 years) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (426 - 3080, n=7) | |
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
Motorola Moto G34 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
Motorola Moto G34 | |
Motorola Moto G23 | |
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
Motorola Moto G34 | |
Motorola Moto G23 | |
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G |
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
Motorola Moto G34 | |
Motorola Moto G23 | |
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G |
3DMark / Wild Life Score | |
Motorola Moto G34 | |
Motorola Moto G23 | |
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Motorola Moto G34 | |
Motorola Moto G23 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G | |
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
Honor X7a |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Motorola Moto G34 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G | |
Motorola Moto G23 | |
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
Honor X7a |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Motorola Moto G34 | |
Motorola Moto G23 | |
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G | |
Honor X7a |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Motorola Moto G34 | |
Motorola Moto G23 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G | |
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
Honor X7a |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Motorola Moto G34 | |
Motorola Moto G23 | |
Honor X7a | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G | |
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Motorola Moto G34 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G | |
Motorola Moto G23 | |
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
Honor X7a |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Motorola Moto G34 | |
Motorola Moto G23 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G | |
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
Honor X7a |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Motorola Moto G34 | |
Motorola Moto G23 | |
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G | |
Honor X7a |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Motorola Moto G34 | |
Motorola Moto G23 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G | |
Honor X7a | |
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Motorola Moto G34 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G | |
Motorola Moto G23 | |
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
Honor X7a |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Motorola Moto G34 | |
Motorola Moto G23 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G | |
Honor X7a | |
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Motorola Moto G34 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G | |
Motorola Moto G23 | |
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
Honor X7a |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Motorola Moto G34 | |
Motorola Moto G23 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G | |
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
Honor X7a |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Moto G34 (Chrome 122) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (48.6 - 105.3, n=19) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Chrome 120) | |
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE (Chrome 114) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Moto G34 (Chrome 122) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (38.7 - 80.1, n=16) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Chrome 120) | |
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE (Chrome 114) |
WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=152, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Moto G34 (Chrome 122) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (58 - 111, n=18) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Chrome 120) | |
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE (Chrome 114) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Moto G34 (Chrome 122) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (17849 - 31647, n=21) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Chrome 120) | |
Motorola Moto G23 (Chrome 111) | |
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE (Chrome 114) | |
Honor X7a (Chrome 114) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE (Chrome 114) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Chrome 120) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (1298 - 2501, n=18) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Moto G34 (Chrome 122) |
* ... smaller is better
Motorola Moto G34 | Motorola Moto G23 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G | Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | Honor X7a | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -47% | 29% | -61% | -66% | -11% | 139% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 524.1 | 282.4 -46% | 909.8 74% | 298.69 -43% | 280 -47% | 760 ? 45% | 1839 ? 251% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 495 | 244.6 -51% | 606.3 22% | 200.17 -60% | 223 -55% | 297 ? -40% | 1425 ? 188% |
Random Read 4KB | 192.1 | 100.2 -48% | 177.1 -8% | 55.9 -71% | 59.1 -69% | 152.9 ? -20% | 277 ? 44% |
Random Write 4KB | 180.2 | 100.5 -44% | 228 27% | 55.86 -69% | 14.7 -92% | 131.6 ? -27% | 309 ? 71% |
Motorola Moto G34 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCMark for Android | -4% | -17% | 127% | |
Storage 2.0 seq. read int. | 462 ? | 586 ? 27% | 488 ? 6% | 1591 ? 244% |
Storage 2.0 seq. write int. | 420 ? | 436 ? 4% | 275 ? -35% | 1405 ? 235% |
Storage 2.0 random read int. | 29 ? | 30.8 ? 6% | 25.8 ? -11% | 38.9 ? 34% |
Storage 2.0 random write int. | 41.9 ? | 22.2 ? -47% | 28.9 ? -31% | 62.4 ? 49% |
Storage 2.0 | 18862 ? | 16582 ? -12% | 15801 ? -16% | 32482 ? 72% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.8 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Wild Life Stress Test
3DMark | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Motorola Moto G34 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G | |
Motorola Moto G23 | |
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G | |
Motorola Moto G34 | |
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE |
Motorola Moto G34 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Honor X7a audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.1 / 0.2 Watt |
Idle | 1 / 1.5 / 1.8 Watt |
Load |
3.2 / 4.8 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Motorola Moto G34 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE 5000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -11% | -27% | -10% | -36% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1 | 1.1 -10% | 0.89 11% | 0.886 ? 11% | 0.894 ? 11% |
Idle Average * | 1.5 | 1.3 13% | 2.31 -54% | 1.76 ? -17% | 1.456 ? 3% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.8 | 1.5 17% | 2.34 -30% | 1.92 ? -7% | 1.616 ? 10% |
Load Average * | 3.2 | 3.6 -13% | 4.11 -28% | 3.86 ? -21% | 6.45 ? -102% |
Load Maximum * | 4.8 | 7.8 -63% | 6.46 -35% | 5.45 ? -14% | 9.8 ? -104% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)
Motorola Moto G34 5000 mAh | Motorola Moto G23 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE 5000 mAh | Honor X7a 5330 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 16% | -2% | -10% | 2% | |
Reader / Idle | 1472 | 1509 3% | 1170 -21% | ||
H.264 | 1205 | 1358 13% | 1044 -13% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 995 | 1152 16% | 742 -25% | 896 -10% | 1014 2% |
Load | 329 | 334 2% | 348 6% |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 最便宜的 5G 手机之一
对于预算较少的人来说,摩托罗拉 Moto G34 5G 确实是一款不错的手机。它具有良好的性能、体面的连接性(包括 eSIM 支持)和音质悦耳的立体声扬声器,此外,它还配备了丰富的配件包,包括充电器和硅胶保护套。此外,并非所有这个价位的手机都能连接 5G。
这款手机是否是同价位手机中的最佳选择,可能取决于您个人的优先选择:您一定需要全高清屏幕吗?那么你应该看看小米或三星的选择。此外,有些手机在价格相近的情况下还能提供更精确的定位服务和更时尚的外壳。
除此之外,Moto G34 5G 几乎无可挑剔:它的运行时间不错,充电时间也不长,摄像头能拍出不错的照片,也不用担心 PWM 闪烁。
摩托罗拉 Moto G34 是一款物美价廉的 5G 智能手机。然而,它的高性能和良好的连接性却被分辨率略低的屏幕所抵消。
要找到一款售价低于 250 美元的 5G 智能手机并非易事。去年的 小米Redmi Note 12 5G例如,去年的小米 5G 手机现在只需 200 多美元就能买到。
Motorola Moto G34
- 03/19/2024 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.