Notebookcheck Logo

小米Redmi Note 12 5G评论:廉价的中档产品,120赫兹和四位数的亮度

是否需要更多的智能电话?

小米Redmi Note 12 5G在其轻巧的塑料外壳中包含了很多功能。在120赫兹的AMOLED屏幕之上,还有新的高通骁龙4代SoC,一个以三星ISOCELL JN1为图像传感器的48MP摄像头,以及一个带有33瓦快速充电电源的5000毫安时电池。然而,Android 版本引发了一些问题。
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen
小米Redmi Note 12 5G

在其Redmi Note 系列中,小米提供价格低廉但装备精良的智能手机,弥补了入门级和中档之间的差距。这一概念在流行的Redmi Note 11系列中实现,并在后续产品中没有改变。

目前红米系列的代表是 Redmi Note 12,Redmi Note 12 5G、 Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G和Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G。它们的价格在200-500美元之间,配备了OLED显示屏,提供120赫兹的标准刷新率。只有入门级的Redmi Note 12型号不具备5G功能。

我们的测试候选人,Redmi Note 12 5G,是该系列中最便宜的5G机型,官方价格为279.99美元。在性能方面,6.67英寸的小米旨在凭借其新的八核SoC高通 骁龙4代1以及4800万像素的三摄像头和5000毫安时的电池等功能。与一款Redmi Note 智能手机相称的是,还包括一个电源适配器,可提供高达33瓦的充电强度。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G (Redmi Note 12 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, 2x Cortex-A78 / 6x Cortex-A55
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 619
Memory
6 GB 
, LPDDR4X
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, capacitive, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 3, Sunlight mode, 1200 nits peak brightness, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 95.2 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm headset jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB; exFAT file format supported, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity sensor, Ambient light sensor, Accelerometer, Electronic compass, IR blaster, Gyroscope, IP53 certified, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3, Head SAR 0.68 W/kg, Body SAR 0.911 W/kg
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1/2/4/5/8), 4G (Band 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/20/28/32/38/40/41), 5G (Band n1/3/5/7/8/20/28/38/40/41/77/78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8 x 165.9 x 76.2
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix (Samsung JN1, f/1.8) + 8MP ultra-wide camera (Omnivision OV08D, f/2.2, FOV 118°) + 2MP macro camera (f/2.4); video recording up to 1080p@30fps
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.45; video recording up to 1080p@30fps
Additional features
Speakers: single, Keyboard: virtual, 33W charger, USB Type-C Cable, SIM Eject Tool, Protective Case, Quick Start Guide, Warranty Card, MIUI 14, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
189 g, Power Supply: 88 g
Price
220 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
81.7 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2023
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
SD 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619
189 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080
82 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2023
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
175 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080
82.8 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2023
Motorola Moto G73 5G
Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256
181 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.50"2400x1080
85.6 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2022
Nothing Phone (1)
SD 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L
193.5 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.55"2400x1080
84.9 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2023
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4
199 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2340x1080
80 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2022
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
SD 680, Adreno 610
179 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.43"2400x1080
80.1 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2023
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
SD 685, Adreno 610
188 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080

外壳 - 流线型塑料底盘,IP53等级

在Redmi Note 12 5G上,你不会发现金属框架、玻璃背面或最新一代的大猩猩玻璃,考虑到它的价格,这不应该是一个惊喜。它坚固的塑料外壳感觉不到特别高的质量,但做得非常好。它的重量为189克,对于这种尺寸的智能手机来说也相当轻。由于通过了IP53认证,它还可以防止灰尘和水的飞溅。

Redmi Note 12 5G采用了与它的Redmi Note 12同事相同的设计,因此在视觉上与专业机型几乎没有区别。然而,屏幕边框略宽,这仍然导致了约85%的良好显示与表面比率。小米没有提供关于显示屏使用的保护玻璃的信息。在AMOLED面板上贴有保护性的显示膜,前者可以发挥作用。

小米提供Redmi Note 12 5G,有森林绿、冰蓝 玛瑙灰三种颜色。所有这三种颜色都有一个哑光的、略带天鹅绒光泽的后盖,指纹在上面很难留下任何痕迹。只有摄像头模块有光亮的表面处理,它从背面突出约2毫米。

小米Redmi Note 12 5G
小米Redmi Note 12 5G
小米Redmi Note 12 5G
小米Redmi Note 12 5G
小米Redmi Note 12 5G
小米Redmi Note 12 5G
小米Redmi Note 12 5G
小米Redmi Note 12 5G
小米Redmi Note 12 5G
小米Redmi Note 12 5G
小米Redmi Note 12 5G
小米Redmi Note 12 5G
小米Redmi Note 12 5G

尺寸比较

165.9 mm 76.2 mm 8 mm 189 g165.9 mm 76.2 mm 8 mm 188 g161.42 mm 73.84 mm 8.29 mm 181 g161.6 mm 73.9 mm 7.9 mm 175 g161.3 mm 78.1 mm 8.2 mm 199 g159.87 mm 73.87 mm 8.09 mm 179 g159.2 mm 75.8 mm 8.3 mm 193.5 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

设备 -Redmi Note 12 5G,4/128 GB内存

Redmi Note 12 5G配备了4GB的LPDDR4X内存和128GB的UFS 2.2存储。后者可以通过microSD卡扩展,其大小可以达到1TB,也可以用exFAT文件格式进行格式化。如果你不做内存扩展,卡槽中还有空间容纳2张nano SIM卡。

除了NFC、蓝牙5.1和3.5毫米插孔外,还有一个支持OTG的USB-C端口,以USB 2.0速度工作。由于支持DRM Widevine L1,这款智能手机可以轻松播放来自Netflix等的高清流媒体。

左边:SIM/MicroSD插槽
左边:SIM/MicroSD插槽
右边:音量摇杆,带指纹传感器的电源键
右边:音量摇杆,带指纹传感器的电源键
顶部:3.5毫米音频插孔,红外辐射器,麦克风
顶部:3.5毫米音频插孔,红外辐射器,麦克风
底部:扬声器、USB-C 2.0、麦克风
底部:扬声器、USB-C 2.0、麦克风

微型SD卡读卡器

使用我们的Angelbird AV Pro V60 microSD参考卡,Redmi Note 12 5G实现了体面的复制速度,略高于23 MB/s,在连续数据传输中也表现良好。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
44.01 MB/s +90%
Motorola Moto G73 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
29.3 MB/s +27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
24.74 MB/s +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
23.6 MB/s +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
23.14 MB/s

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø36.3 (4.86-48.5)
Motorola Moto G73 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø35.7 (26.1-47)
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø32 (22-43.6)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø38.4 (25.6-49.1)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø39.3 (27.4-50)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø61.2 (29.9-79.8)
Motorola Moto G73 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76.4 (50.9-84.3)
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø70 (39.2-78.2)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø76.4 (38.4-81.8)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø75.5 (28-82.5)

软件 - 仅限Android 12

基本上,小米智能手机的买家可以认为他们的设备将在3年内每三个月收到2次操作系统升级和安全更新。目前的红米系列也是这种情况,它配备了制造商的MIUI 14用户界面,但我们并不真正了解小米的软件战略。

虽然Redmi Note 12推出的是Android 13,而Redmi Note 12 5G和 Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G,实际上在红米的层次结构中更高,只有Android 12。因此,根据小米安全中心的说法,4G版本从操作系统升级中受益最大,因为它是唯一有资格升级到Android 15的版本。相比之下,我们的Redmi Note 12 5G测试候选人和Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G将只有Android 14作为最后一次操作系统升级。

小米Redmi Note 12 5G
小米Redmi Note 12 5G
小米Redmi Note 12 5G
小米Redmi Note 12 5G
小米Redmi Note 12 5G
小米Redmi Note 12 5G

通信和GNSS - 稳定的WiFi 5和良好的GPS

在WLAN方面,小米Redmi Note 12 5G通过WiFi 5进行通信。连接到我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器,该智能手机实现了高达363MBit/s的传输速率,在发送和接收方面都非常稳定。竞争对手的智能手机也达到了非常相似的速度。只有三星Galaxy A34 5G由于支持VHT80,它的WiFi 5带宽明显增加,而 Nothing Phone (1)支持WiFi 6E。

Redmi Note 12 5G的移动频率范围不是太广泛,只有12个5G频段和13个LTE频段。因此,这款智能手机并不具备任何环球旅行的品质,但至少在欧盟地区应该不会出现连接问题。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=184, last 2 years)
714 MBit/s +106%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
634 (610min - 642max) MBit/s +83%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
357 (172min - 378max) MBit/s +3%
Motorola Moto G73 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
356 (333min - 362max) MBit/s +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
347 (336min - 351max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
298 (198min - 345max) MBit/s -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
286 (267min - 310max) MBit/s -18%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=186, last 2 years)
729 MBit/s +101%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
679 (653min - 709max) MBit/s +87%
Motorola Moto G73 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
373 (355min - 386max) MBit/s +3%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
369 (337min - 380max) MBit/s +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
363 (349min - 374max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
325 (290min - 347max) MBit/s -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
322 (162min - 386max) MBit/s -11%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone
  (229 - 1902, n=76, last 2 years)
1440 MBit/s
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
946 (926min - 951max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone
  (668 - 1864, n=76, last 2 years)
1371 MBit/s
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
598 (517min - 731max) MBit/s
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360380Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø345 (336-351)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø297 (198-345)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø286 (267-310)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø363 (349-374)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø323 (162-386)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø325 (290-347)
GPS信号(室内)
GPS信号(室内)
GPS信号(室外)
GPS信号(室外)

小米通过GPS(L1)、Glonass(L1)、Galileo(E1)和北斗(B1)卫星导航系统确定其当前位置。在测试中,它在室外和室内都能做到这一点,精确度为3米。

我们还测试了Redmi Note 12 5G的实际跟踪能力,让智能手机与Garmin Venu2在自行车骑行中竞争。对比路线记录,智能手机显示出几乎与健身追踪器一样的精确度,即使在密集的建筑区偶尔会有几米的偏差。总的来说,Redmi Note 12 5G非常适用于导航任务。

GPS测试:总结
GPS测试:总结
GPS测试:环湖航行
GPS测试:环湖航行
GPS测试:又一次环湖航行
GPS测试:又一次环湖航行
GPS测试:通过密集的城市地区
GPS测试:通过密集的城市地区

电话和语音质量

两张nano SIM卡,或一张nano SIM卡和一张microSD卡可以放入Redmi Note 12 5G的混合SIM卡槽。支持VoLTE和WiFi通话。

Redmi Note 12 5G在语音质量方面表现良好。语音在线路两端都能清晰地再现,在免提模式下听起来只有轻微的闷响。

摄像机 -Redmi Note 12 5G与三星ISOCELL JN1

用自拍相机拍照
用自拍相机拍照

Redmi Note 12 5G的1300万像素自拍相机位于一个冲孔中,在日光下拍摄令人满意的照片,清晰度和曝光度都不错。它可以录制全高清分辨率的视频,最多每秒30帧。

后置三摄像头包括一个来自三星的4800万像素主传感器(ISOCELL JN1),一个800万像素超广角摄像头(Omnivision OV08D)和一个用于微距拍摄的200万像素传感器。

ISOCELL JN1的传感器尺寸为1/2.76英寸,以f/1.8光圈工作。利用像素分选,它将四个相邻的像素合并为一个,将像素尺寸从0.64微米增加到1.27微米,产生1200万像素的图像。在相机选项中,全传感器分辨率也可用于48MP模式。视频录制可以在30 FPS的最大全高清状态下进行,具有电子稳定功能,并提供坚实的图像质量。

在明亮的光线下,Redmi Note 12 5G的主摄像头能拍出好照片。它们显示了大量的细节,并以生动和真实的色彩取悦于人。这一点在测试实验室中也得到了证实,因为ColorChecker测试图显示没有大的异常值,最大Delta-E为<12。然而,当被摄对象距离较远时,图像清晰度就会受到影响,因此变焦拍摄尤其看起来很模糊。尽管图像传感器很小,但主摄像头在黑暗中仍能捕捉到大量的光线,但细节和图像清晰度都处于较低水平。

800万像素的超广角摄像头可以拍摄118°视野的照片,但其质量明显低于主摄像头的水平。照片被洗掉了,像素化了,特别是在图像的边缘,一般来说细节水平很低。

用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photo 1Daylight photo 2Ultra wide angle5x zoomLow light
ColorChecker
11.9 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G: 7.25 ∆E min: 1.51 - max: 11.89 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.1 ∆E
53 ∆E
38.9 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
44 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
52.6 ∆E
34.4 ∆E
41.6 ∆E
26.6 ∆E
65 ∆E
63.7 ∆E
29.8 ∆E
49.3 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
76.3 ∆E
42.2 ∆E
44.4 ∆E
88.5 ∆E
69.9 ∆E
51.2 ∆E
36 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G: 46.22 ∆E min: 13.2 - max: 88.46 ∆E

配件和保修 - 包括33瓦的电源适配器

包括33瓦的电源。
包括33瓦的电源。

小米Redmi Note 12 5G配有一个33瓦的电源适配器,一条USB线(A型到C型),一个透明保护套,一个SIM卡工具,以及快速入门指南和保修信息。

小米在欧盟为Redmi Note 12 5G提供12个月的保修。这在其他国家和地区可能有所不同,所以买家在购买前应仔细检查。

输入设备和操作 - 始终显示,有10秒限制

Redmi Note 12 5G的显示屏以240赫兹的触摸采样率工作,与120赫兹的刷新率相结合,使操作变得漂亮而流畅。

尽管屏幕反应灵敏,但在使用过程中有时会出现故障,因为骁龙4代1在4GB内存的支持下,并不是一个性能奇迹。例如,当智能手机从待机状态唤醒或在同时打开的大量应用程序之间切换时,可能会出现小的延迟。但总体而言,延迟并不特别明显。

小米的永远在线显示屏能够显示诸如日期、时间、电池状态和背景图案等元素。然而,这并不是永久保持激活状态,而是在点击屏幕后显示10秒钟。智能手机可以通过集成在电源按钮上的指纹传感器进行一次生物识别解锁,该传感器工作可靠。通过自拍相机的2D面部识别传感器进行认证也同样快速,但安全性较低。

纵向模式下的键盘
纵向模式下的键盘
横向模式下的键盘
横向模式下的键盘

显示 - 四位数的峰值亮度

子像素矩阵
子像素矩阵

Redmi Note 12 5G的6.67英寸AMOLED面板的分辨率为2400 x 1080像素,以120赫兹的速度平稳运行。另外,刷新率可以在显示设置中降低到60赫兹,以节省电力。支持HDR10和HLG。

对于其价格范围内的智能手机,小米提供高于平均水平的亮度。峰值为671cd/m²,非常接近制造商在HBM(高亮度模式)下700尼特的规格。它没有达到承诺的1200尼特的峰值亮度,但在APL18测量中表现非常好,达到1014 cd/m²。这种水平的亮度通常只出现在更昂贵的智能手机上。

当亮度传感器停用时,Redmi Note 12 5G的AMOLED面板以423 cd/m²的最大亮度闪耀。在最低亮度设置下,它的亮度会降低到2.45cd/m²。

AMOLED面板通过脉冲宽度调制(PWM)来调节亮度,这意味着不能排除屏幕闪烁的可能性。在低亮度范围内,相当不稳定的PWM频率意味着敏感的用户可能会有问题。在屏幕亮度为54%或以下时,PWM闪动的频率范围为159至555赫兹。在亮度为54%及以上时,PWM闪烁与刷新率相对应。

658
cd/m²
659
cd/m²
666
cd/m²
661
cd/m²
658
cd/m²
670
cd/m²
665
cd/m²
662
cd/m²
671
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 671 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 663.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.45 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 658 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Motorola Moto G73 5G
IPS LCD, 2400x1080, 6.5"
Nothing Phone (1)
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6"
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.4"
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Screen
9%
-44%
2%
-15%
13%
-3%
Brightness middle
658
846
29%
516
-22%
620
-6%
922
40%
702
7%
650
-1%
Brightness
663
853
29%
498
-25%
625
-6%
930
40%
701
6%
658
-1%
Brightness Distribution
98
88
-10%
89
-9%
98
0%
98
0%
98
0%
97
-1%
Black Level *
0.43
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.4
1.3
7%
2.08
-49%
1.24
11%
2.5
-79%
1
29%
1.55
-11%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.7
2.7
-0%
5.94
-120%
2.31
14%
3.6
-33%
2.3
15%
2.59
4%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.7
1.7
-0%
2.4
-41%
1.7
-0%
2.7
-59%
1.4
18%
1.8
-6%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.19 100%
2.283 96%
2.318 95%
2.09 105%
2.2 100%
2.194 100%
CCT
6504 100%
6570 99%
7006 93%
6325 103%
6661 98%
6520 100%
6316 103%
Contrast
1200

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 343 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 343 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 343 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最小显示亮度
分钟。
25%的显示亮度
25%
50%的显示亮度
50%
75%的显示亮度
75%
最大显示亮度
100%

在固定的变焦水平和不同的亮度设置下进行的一系列测量

在图像质量参数方面,Redmi Note 12 5G提供三种色彩方案:生动 (预设)、饱和 标准。还可以选择调整色温。当色彩方案和色温设置为标准时,显示器实现了最佳的图像质量。然后,AMOLED面板在颜色或灰度方面几乎不显示任何偏差,并与几乎理想的色温相结合。

色彩的保真度(配色方案:标准,色温:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩的保真度(配色方案:标准,色温:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配色方案:标准,色温:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配色方案:标准,色温:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(色彩方案:标准,色温:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(色彩方案:标准,色温:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩饱和度(配色方案:标准,色温:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩饱和度(配色方案:标准,色温:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.523 ms rise
↘ 0.475 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.35 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.691 ms rise
↘ 0.658 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

由于其高亮度,Redmi Note 12 5G很适合在户外使用。即使在阳光直射下,可视角度稳定的显示屏上的内容也可以毫无困难地阅读。

室外使用(阳光直射)。
室外使用(阳光直射)。
室外使用(在阴凉处)。
室外使用(在阴凉处)。
视角稳定
视角稳定

性能 - 骁龙4代的首演

小米Redmi Note 12 5G是首批使用Snapdragon 4 Gen 1的智能手机之一 。作为Snapdragon 480+的继任者, ,据说它的运行速度比上一代快15%左右。高通公司称,GPU的性能最多可提高10%。除了两个时钟频率高达2GHz的快速Cortex-A78内核外,2022年10月推出的骁龙4 Gen 1有六个节能的Cortex-A55内核,最高运行频率为1.8GHz。Adreno 619 被用作图形单元。

该系统的性能Redmi Note 12的性能足以以微弱优势击败Redmi Note 12,后者配备的是 骁龙685.然而,用户在实践中不太可能注意到这一微小的性能差异。骁龙4代1在测试领域最难对付的对手是 骁龙695Honor Magic5 Lite 5G.小米 小米Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G的速度更快,能够与 三星Galaxy A34 5G在性能方面的竞争。

不幸的是,AnTuTu v9没有在Redmi Note 12 5G上运行,因为智能手机阻止了与基准供应商服务器的连接。几乎同样的命运降临到3DMark上。至少我们能够进行弹弓测试。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=172, last 2 years)
995 Points +55%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
824 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
782 Points +22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
765 Points +19%
Motorola Moto G73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
698 Points +9%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
666 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
642 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
  ()
642 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
442 Points -31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
384 Points -40%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6687, n=172, last 2 years)
3312 Points +69%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2998 Points +53%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
2315 Points +18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
2035 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
1954 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
  ()
1954 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
1909 Points -2%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1891 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1787 Points -9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1738 Points -11%
Geekbench 6.0
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (188 - 2008, n=41, last 2 years)
1257 Points +49%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
1029 Points +22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
968 Points +15%
Motorola Moto G73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
916 Points +9%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
898 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
841 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
  ()
841 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
477 Points -43%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 5702, n=41, last 2 years)
3366 Points +80%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
2497 Points +33%
Motorola Moto G73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
2306 Points +23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
2201 Points +17%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2067 Points +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
1875 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
  ()
1875 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1498 Points -20%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 24088, n=190, last 2 years)
12976 Points +63%
Motorola Moto G73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
11787 Points +48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
11763 Points +48%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
11721 Points +47%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
11662 Points +47%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
10071 Points +27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
9421 Points +18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
7953 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
  ()
7953 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
7694 Points -3%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 1517, n=157, last 2 years)
884 Points +64%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
760 Points +41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
665 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
657 Points +22%
Motorola Moto G73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
612 Points +14%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
597 Points +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
539 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
  ()
539 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
454 Points -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
388 Points -28%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)
6297 Points +89%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4768 Points +43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
4189 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3850 Points +15%
Motorola Moto G73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
3771 Points +13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
3337 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
  ()
3337 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2738 Points -18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2737 Points -18%
System
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
10424 Points +62%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)
10163 Points +58%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
7182 Points +12%
Motorola Moto G73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
6979 Points +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
6684 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
6437 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
  ()
6437 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
6155 Points -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
5794 Points -10%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)
6767 Points +66%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
5938 Points +46%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
5267 Points +30%
Motorola Moto G73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
4955 Points +22%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4763 Points +17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
4065 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
  ()
4065 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
3824 Points -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
3254 Points -20%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)
16908 Points +323%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
8175 Points +104%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
5093 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
4666 Points +17%
Motorola Moto G73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
4011 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
4001 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
  ()
4001 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2334 Points -42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2183 Points -45%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)
1564 Points +32%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
1521 Points +28%
Motorola Moto G73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
1457 Points +23%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
1273 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
1244 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1232 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1199 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
1184 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
  ()
1184 Points 0%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
22490 Points +317%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
21997 Points +308%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
20784 Points +285%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 74958, n=143, last 2 years)
16841 Points +212%
Motorola Moto G73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
5507 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
5395 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
  ()
5395 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
4853 Points -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
4445 Points -18%

与之不同的是 骁龙4代1不同的是,新SoC中集成的GPU是智能手机市场上的老熟人:Adreno 619。 Adreno 619允许小米Redmi Note 12 5G实现坚实的3D性能,如合成基准所示,它略高于 Redmi Note 12.然而,其他一些骁龙和联发科竞争对手的速度要快得多,包括 小米Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G.

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3086 Points +15%
Motorola Moto G73 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2999 Points +12%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2854 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2763 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2677 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2589 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2375 Points -11%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5412 Points +131%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4359 Points +86%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4198 Points +79%
Motorola Moto G73 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2932 Points +25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2347 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1343 Points -43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1155 Points -51%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4513 Points +87%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3993 Points +65%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3784 Points +57%
Motorola Moto G73 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2947 Points +22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2413 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1545 Points -36%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1253 Points -48%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4518 Points +40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4411 Points +37%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4047 Points +25%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3537 Points +9%
Motorola Moto G73 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3452 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3231 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2676 Points -17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2573 Points -20%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5759 Points +122%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4406 Points +70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4387 Points +69%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3001 Points +16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2590 Points
Motorola Moto G73 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2416 Points -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1436 Points -45%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1199 Points -54%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5428 Points +100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4362 Points +61%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4321 Points +60%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3106 Points +15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2709 Points
Motorola Moto G73 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2589 Points -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1558 Points -42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1372 Points -49%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
113 fps +95%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
89 fps +53%
Motorola Moto G73 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
70 fps +21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
64 fps +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
58 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
39 fps -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
37 fps -36%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
141 fps +66%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
106 fps +25%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
106 fps +25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
85 fps
Motorola Moto G73 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
74 fps -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
45 fps -47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
42 fps -51%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
74 fps +106%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
58 fps +61%
Motorola Moto G73 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
56 fps +56%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
54 fps +50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
36 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps -42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -53%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
82 fps +91%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
69 fps +60%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
68 fps +58%
Motorola Moto G73 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
63 fps +47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
43 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps -44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps -53%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps +132%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps +60%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
39 fps +56%
Motorola Moto G73 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
32 fps +28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps -44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps -48%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64 fps +106%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
46 fps +48%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
43 fps +39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
31 fps
Motorola Moto G73 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps -48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps -48%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps +120%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps +53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps +47%
Motorola Moto G73 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps +20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.6 fps -49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.3 fps -51%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps +118%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
27 fps +59%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps +53%
Motorola Moto G73 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.9 fps -48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.6 fps -49%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps +55%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps +27%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps +9%
Motorola Moto G73 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.4 fps -51%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5 fps -55%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
15 fps +111%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps +69%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps +55%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.2 fps +15%
Motorola Moto G73 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.1 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.1 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.6 fps -49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.2 fps -55%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps +112%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
27 fps +59%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps +53%
Motorola Moto G73 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps +12%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.2 fps -46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.8 fps -48%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps +100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps +45%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps +45%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps +10%
Motorola Moto G73 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
10.1 fps -49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.8 fps -51%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6.7 fps +116%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4.7 fps +52%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4.7 fps +52%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.6 fps +16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.1 fps
Motorola Moto G73 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3 fps -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1.5 fps -52%

小米Redmi Note 12 5G在网上冲浪方面表现良好。测试中很少出现页面加载延迟的情况。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)
120.4 Points +107%
Motorola Moto G73 5G (Chrome 111.0.5563.116)
77.058 Points +33%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)
73.679 Points +27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G (Chrome 111)
71.873 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G (Chrome 111.0.5563.116)
69.688 Points +20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G (Chrome 113)
58.945 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G (Chrome 113.0.5672.76)
58.044 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 ()
58 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101)
43.525 Points -25%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)
136.2 runs/min +181%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G (Chrome 111)
62.9 runs/min +30%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G (Chrome 111.0.5563.116)
62.2 runs/min +28%
Motorola Moto G73 5G (Chrome 111.0.5563.116)
58.44 runs/min +20%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chome 103)
53.71 runs/min +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G (Chrome 113)
50.9 runs/min +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G (Chrome 113.0.5672.76)
48.5 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 ()
48.5 runs/min 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101)
39.64 runs/min -18%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=152, last 2 years)
113.8 Points +67%
Motorola Moto G73 5G (Chrome 111.0.5563.116)
86 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G (Chrome 111.0.5563.116)
74 Points +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G (Chrome 111)
71 Points +4%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)
69 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G (Chrome 113.0.5672.76)
68 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 ()
68 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G (Chrome 113)
58 Points -15%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
148.7 Points +63%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G (Chrome 111.0.5563.116)
114 Points +25%
Motorola Moto G73 5G (Chrome 111.0.5563.116)
110 Points +21%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)
102 Points +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G (Chrome 111)
102 Points +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G (Chrome 113.0.5672.76)
91 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 ()
91 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G (Chrome 113)
74 Points -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101)
67 Points -26%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)
37161 Points +87%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G (Chrome 111)
31662 Points +59%
Motorola Moto G73 5G (Chrome 111.0.5563.116)
26766 Points +35%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G (Chrome 111.0.5563.116)
25154 Points +27%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)
24488 Points +23%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G (Chrome 112)
22847 Points +15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G (Chrome 113.0.5672.76)
19867 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 ()
19867 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G (Chrome 113)
15695 Points -21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101)
13056 Points -34%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101)
3234.1 ms * -53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G (Chrome 113)
2534.5 ms * -20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G (Chrome 113.0.5672.76)
2117.2 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 ()
2117 ms * -0%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G (Chrome 111.0.5563.116)
1796.7 ms * +15%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)
1796.1 ms * +15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G (Chrome 111)
1766.4 ms * +17%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)
1568 ms * +26%
Motorola Moto G73 5G (Chrome 111.0.5563.116)
1465.9 ms * +31%

* ... smaller is better

小米Redmi Note 12 5G使用UFS 2.2存储,在同类产品中提供典型的良好性能。然而,该智能手机的4G版本在连续读写方面要快得多,尽管它使用相同的内存标准。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5GHonor Magic5 Lite 5GMotorola Moto G73 5GNothing Phone (1)Samsung Galaxy A34 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 11Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4GXiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5GAverage 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-8%
55%
116%
31%
19%
55%
63%
18%
148%
Sequential Read 256KB
520.09
486.17
-7%
963.54
85%
1638
215%
887.41
71%
895.34
72%
954.87
84%
1008.8
94%
Sequential Write 256KB
505.55
420.44
-17%
808.95
60%
1351.9
167%
494.67
-2%
519.23
3%
709.51
40%
865.59
71%
Random Read 4KB
170.61
171.13
0%
231.38
36%
240.6
41%
216.75
27%
172.95
1%
261.09
53%
241.83
42%
191.7 ?(89.3 - 297, n=71)
12%
Random Write 4KB
161.26
149.12
-8%
220.46
37%
228.2
42%
206.14
28%
163.29
1%
231.57
44%
234.21
45%
185.8 ?(62.6 - 419, n=71)
15%

游戏 - 得益于Adreno 619的良好性能

游戏在小米Redmi Note 12 5G上运行流畅,即使你不得不时不时地减少图形细节。尽管如此,小米的阿德雷诺619GPU使其成为比4G版本更好的选择,4G版本不得不使用较弱的 Adreno 610.

小米Redmi Note 12 5G在Armajet中取得了平均95 FPS的好成绩。相比之下,小米12的帧率Redmi Note 12的帧率要低得多,而且一次又一次地大幅下降。评测样本的Adreno 619 GPU的小而明显的性能优势在PUBG Mobile中也很明显。与Redmi Note 12不同,你不仅可以选择高清设置,而且射击游戏也几乎一直以60 FPS运行。

帧率是用我们的Gamebench测试工具确定的。

氩氦刀
氩氦刀
PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø95 (55-110)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G; Dead Trigger 2; 1.8.25: Ø93 (85-103)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G; PUBG Mobile; 2.4.0: Ø59.6 (55-60)

排放 - 始终提供最大的性能

温度

GFXBench的T-Rex电池测试
GFXBench的T-Rex电池测试

在40.3°C的峰值下,小米Redmi Note 12 5G在永久负载下仍保持相对凉爽。骁龙4代1的低热开发也确保了该SoC在日常使用中几乎可以一直提供完整的性能。这一点在GFXBench压力测试中得到了进一步证实。

在GFXBench的T-Rex测试场景中,除了极小的偏差外,测试场景从第一次运行到第30次运行都以相同的速度持续渲染,因此它从未在性能损失上挣扎。

注:我们通常用3DMark进行压力测试。然而,由于小米阻止在Redmi Note 12 5G上下载3DMark Wild Life基准测试,我们使用GFXBench作为替代。

Max. Load
 39.7 °C37 °C34.2 °C 
 40.3 °C36.9 °C34.1 °C 
 39.2 °C38.4 °C33.6 °C 
Maximum: 40.3 °C
Average: 37 °C
35.7 °C39 °C38.8 °C
33.5 °C38.5 °C39.5 °C
33.7 °C38.1 °C37.5 °C
Maximum: 39.5 °C
Average: 37.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  30.2 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
小米Redmi Note 12 5G
小米Redmi Note 12 5G

发言人

与此相反的是 Redmi Note 12Redmi Note 12 5G不具备立体声功能。相反,你不得不使用位于USB-C端口旁边的扬声器产生的单声道声音。低音几乎不存在,中音也不太线性。总而言之,在这个价格范围内,声音是令人满意的。

外部音频设备可以通过3.5毫米插孔或蓝牙5.1连接到小米。Redmi Note 12 5G支持所有常见的蓝牙编解码器,如AAC、LDAC、LHDC V3/V4,以及aptX HD、aptX自适应音频和aptX TWS+音频。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.734.72520.835.3311931.24017.134.25033.440.16320.940.18016.638.710020.541.412516.54216014.742.22001445.425014.349.231513.154.640013.660.350013.267.363012.370.280012.572.2100011.979.3125012.678.8160012.979.1200013.379.6250012.578.8315013.480.5400013.983500013.983.1630013.580.7800013.776.31000013.977.71250013.576.41600013.761.8SPL25.391.5N0.787.4median 13.5median 76.4Delta0.79.737.436.62828.232.625.427.7283437.82725.423.625.922.328.617.730.516.145.312.845.213.150.71257.3960.81168.410.771.110.374.410.973.712.176.411.878.61278.911.878.411.977.712.978.713.379.713.47813.572.713.670.714.868.614.161.224.6890.676.6median 12.8median 72.71.210.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi Note 12 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 11
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 1小时内完成充电

能源消耗

小米Redmi Note 12 5G不支持无线充电,但它确实支持高达33瓦的快速充电。在测试中,使5000毫安时的电池从0到100%需要65分钟。

在功耗方面,这款智能手机相当不显眼。它不是特别经济,但也不浪费。它的耗电量超过了 小米Redmi Note 12负载下高达4.72瓦。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.04 / 0.08 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.99 / 1.98 / 2.02 Watt
Load midlight 3.35 / 4.72 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G73 5G
5000 mAh
Nothing Phone (1)
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
5000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-14%
-4%
2%
6%
2%
0%
-29%
Idle Minimum *
0.99
0.7
29%
1
-1%
0.69
30%
1.06
-7%
0.8
19%
0.99 ?()
-0%
Idle Average *
1.98
1.2
39%
1.2
39%
1.61
19%
1.93
3%
1
49%
1.98 ?()
-0%
Idle Maximum *
2.02
1.8
11%
1.5
26%
1.66
18%
1.96
3%
1.5
26%
2.02 ?()
-0%
Load Average *
3.35
4.8
-43%
4.2
-25%
4.01
-20%
2.87
14%
4.8
-43%
3.35 ?()
-0%
Load Maximum *
4.72
9.7
-106%
7.4
-57%
6.5
-38%
3.85
18%
6.7
-42%
4.72 ?()
-0%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.22 (1.053-5.84)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.03 (1.109-6.23)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø2.51 (0.839-6.72)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.395 (1.314-1.468)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.302 (1.117-1.614)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.289 (0.996-1.847)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.83 (2.64-3.15)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.88 (2.54-5.23)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.82 (2.47-4.26)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.395 (1.314-1.468)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.302 (1.117-1.614)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.289 (0.996-1.847)

电池寿命

在显示屏亮度调整为150cd/m²,刷新率设置为120Hz的情况下,这款中端智能手机在模拟网上冲浪时可以持续10:45小时,在视频播放时可以达到17:45小时。这使得它的持久性比小米手机差一点。 小米Redmi Note 12,后者也有一个5000毫安时的电池。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
27h 48min
WiFi Websurfing
10h 45min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
17h 45min
Load (maximum brightness)
6h 28min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
5000 mAh
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
5100 mAh
Motorola Moto G73 5G
5000 mAh
Nothing Phone (1)
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
27%
39%
5%
42%
16%
5%
6%
Reader / Idle
1668
3458
107%
1813
9%
2975
78%
2098
26%
1512
-9%
1598
-4%
H.264
1065
1197
12%
1059
-1%
1363
28%
1076
1%
1402
32%
1043
-2%
WiFi v1.3
645
816
27%
1046
62%
926
44%
1024
59%
842
31%
719
11%
978
52%
Load
388
290
-25%
259
-33%
395
2%
409
5%
327
-16%
299
-23%

Pros

+ 明亮的AMOLED面板,120赫兹
+ 强大的设备
+ 快速充电和33瓦的电源
+ 良好的做工
+ 可靠的电池寿命

Cons

- 没有立体声
- Android 12只
- 混合双卡

对小米Redmi Note 12 5G的评判

在审查中:小米Redmi Note 12 5G。测试设备由:
在审查中:小米Redmi Note 12 5G。测试设备由:

小米Redmi Note 12 5G延续了之前Redmi Note 智能手机的传统:它以相对较少的钱提供大量的硬件,并提供坚实的中档性能。该 骁龙4第一代并没有完全把这个轻巧的6.67英寸设备变成一个火箭,但性能很容易满足日常使用。在使用过程中几乎没有任何打嗝现象,目前的游戏也能顺利运行。

小米Redmi Note 12 5G是一款装备精良的中档智能手机,价格合理。

高品质的Redmi Note 12 5G也因其明亮的AMOLED屏幕而得分,其数值超过1000 cd/m²,刷新率为120 Hz。我们还喜欢其4800万像素的摄像头,在白天也能拍出高质量的照片。电池运行时间并不突出,但相当稳固。此外,5000毫安时的电池可以通过附带的33瓦特电源适配器快速充电。

Redmi Note 12 5G的一大批评点是其Android 版本。为什么这款智能手机搭载了目前仅基于Android 12的MIUI 14界面,这仍然是一个只有制造商知道的秘密。因此,用户不能指望除了升级到Android 14。与Redmi Note 12相比,省略的立体声也是一个减分点。

Redmi Note 12 5G的替代品是Nothing Phone (1)三星Galaxy A34 5G 以及4G版的Redmi Note 12 ,其速度几乎没有任何下降,装备几乎一样好。

价格和可用性

在美国亚马逊,Redmi Note 12 5G的上市价格为279.99美元。对于国际客户,进口版本的价格是246.00美元

价格截至2023年6月7日,可能会有变化。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G - 06/02/2023 v7 (old)
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
84%
Keyboard
66 / 75 → 88%
Pointing Device
88%
Connectivity
51 / 70 → 73%
Weight
89%
Battery
90%
Display
91%
Games Performance
29 / 64 → 45%
Application Performance
72 / 86 → 84%
Temperature
90%
Noise
100%
Audio
78 / 90 → 87%
Camera
64%
Average
76%
82%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 小米Redmi Note 12 5G评论:廉价的中档产品,120赫兹和四位数的亮度
Manuel Masiero, 2023-06- 8 (Update: 2024-08-15)