联想 Moto G4 Play 智能手机简短评测

Name: Lenovo Moto G4 Play
Brand: Lenovo

第四回合。Moto G4 Play可能是Moto G系列中最便宜的机型了，但联想也没有让它全面缩水。在测试中，这台5寸安卓智能手机的优秀性价比、优秀硬件配置和长续航时间给了我们很深的印象。

Manuel Masiero, ✓ Tanja Hinum (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 10/14/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Lenovo Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Lenovo Moto G4 Play (Moto G Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 4 x 1.2 GHz, Cortex-A53

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 306

Memory

2048 MB

Display

5.00 inch 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 294 PPI, 电容式，多点触控, IPS, Gorilla Glass 3, glossy: yes

Storage

16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB

, 10.4 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米音频接口, Card Reader: MicroSD卡最大支持128 GB, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速感应器，近距感应器，环境光感应器, Chromecast, USB-OTG, App2SD

Networking

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1 LE, GSM (850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz), UMTS (850, 900, 1,900, 2,100 MHz), LTE Cat.4 (频段 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 9.9 x 144.4 x 72

Battery

10.6 Wh, 2800 mAh Lithium-Ion, removeable

Operating System

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0, LED 闪光灯, 自动HDR, 视频拍摄最高1080p 30 fps
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.2

Additional features

Speakers: 前置扬声器, Keyboard: 触控, Keyboard Light: yes, 电源适配器，快速说明, 24 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

137 g, Power Supply: 30 g

Price

159 Euro

Links

Lenovo homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL Lenovo Moto G4 Play Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 HTC One A9 Sony Xperia XA DIN A6 ❌

SD Card Reader
maximum SDCardreader Maximum Transfer Rate
average SDCardreader Average Transfer Rate

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Sony Xperia XA Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash	92.5 MBit/s +103%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash	45.6 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Sony Xperia XA Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash	83.6 MBit/s +79%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash	46.7 MBit/s

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


404 cd/m²	417 cd/m²	430 cd/m²
413 cd/m²	412 cd/m²	416 cd/m²
406 cd/m²	416 cd/m²	414 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 430 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 414.2 cd/m² Minimum: 14.5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 412 cd/m²
Contrast: 981:1 (Black: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.4

	Lenovo Moto G4 Play IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL IPS, 1280x720, 5.5"	HTC One A9 AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5"	Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.2"	Sony Xperia XA IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 IPS, 1280x720, 5"
Screen		11%	22%	7%	-9%	6%
Brightness middle	412	586 42%	346 -16%	289 -30%	518 26%	418 1%
Brightness	414	566 37%	349 -16%	291 -30%	475 15%	407 -2%
Brightness Distribution	94	84 -11%	93 -1%	96 2%	81 -14%	95 1%
Black Level *	0.42	0.57 -36%			0.61 -45%	0.49 -17%
Contrast	981	1028 5%			849 -13%	853 -13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.6	4.2 25%	1.55 72%	4.7 16%	6.8 -21%	3.92 30%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	9.7	8.4 13%		7.3 25%	11.4 -18%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.9	6.3 9%	2.05 70%	3 57%	7 -1%	3.81 45%
Gamma	2.4 ^92%	2.39 ^92%	2.15 ^102%	2.03 ^108%	2.35 ^94%	2.27 ^97%
CCT	8422 ^77%	6614 ^98%	6267 ^104%	6291 ^103%	8151 ^80%	7361 ^88%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7 ms rise
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 31 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 12 ms rise
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	28399 Points
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL	26169 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	27232 Points -4%
Sony Xperia XA	48331 Points +70%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	4432 Points
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL	4328 Points -2%
HTC One A9	9163 Points +107%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	4400 Points -1%
Sony Xperia XA	11156 Points +152%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	4402 Points -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	3858 Points
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL	3767 Points -2%
HTC One A9	9015 Points +134%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	3838 Points -1%
Sony Xperia XA	10916 Points +183%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	3789 Points -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	9256 Points
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL	9043 Points -2%
HTC One A9	9423 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	9022 Points -3%
Sony Xperia XA	12138 Points +31%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	10148 Points +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	53 Points
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL	53 Points 0%
HTC One A9	680 Points +1183%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	53 Points 0%
Sony Xperia XA	603 Points +1038%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	49 Points -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	42 Points
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL	42 Points 0%
HTC One A9	618 Points +1371%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	42 Points 0%
Sony Xperia XA	525 Points +1150%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	39 Points -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	716 Points
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL	719 Points 0%
HTC One A9	1051 Points +47%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	709 Points -1%
Sony Xperia XA	1259 Points +76%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	758 Points +6%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	9.6 fps
HTC One A9	16 fps +67%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	9.7 fps +1%
Sony Xperia XA	28 fps +192%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	9.5 fps -1%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	5.2 fps
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL	5.2 fps 0%
HTC One A9	16 fps +208%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	5.2 fps 0%
Sony Xperia XA	18 fps +246%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	5.3 fps +2%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	4.1 fps
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL	1.8 fps -56%
HTC One A9	6.7 fps +63%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	3.8 fps -7%
Sony Xperia XA	15 fps +266%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	3.7 fps -10%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	1.8 fps
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL	3.8 fps +111%
HTC One A9	6.4 fps +256%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	1.8 fps 0%
Sony Xperia XA	7.2 fps +300%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	1.7 fps -6%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
HTC One A9	4 fps
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	fps
Sony Xperia XA	11 fps
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
HTC One A9	3.8 fps
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	fps
Sony Xperia XA	4.8 fps

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	4283 Points
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL	3691 Points -14%
HTC One A9	4293 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	4126 Points -4%
Sony Xperia XA	4685 Points +9%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	3701 Points -14%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	603 Points
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL	622 Points +3%
HTC One A9	981 Points +63%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	585 Points -3%
Sony Xperia XA	1043 Points +73%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	515 Points -15%
System (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	1035 Points
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL	1088 Points +5%
HTC One A9	1595 Points +54%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	1060 Points +2%
Sony Xperia XA	2289 Points +121%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	1166 Points +13%
Memory (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	741 Points
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL	797 Points +8%
HTC One A9	1018 Points +37%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	643 Points -13%
Sony Xperia XA	1076 Points +45%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	394 Points -47%
Graphics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	313 Points
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL	317 Points +1%
HTC One A9	726 Points +132%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	312 Points 0%
Sony Xperia XA	669 Points +114%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	315 Points +1%
Web (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	551 Points
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL	544 Points -1%
HTC One A9	786 Points +43%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	551 Points 0%
Sony Xperia XA	717 Points +30%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	484 Points -12%

Legend

Lenovo Moto G4 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash

HTC One A9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Sony Xperia XA Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash

Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015 | JetStream 1.1

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	2773 Points
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL	2685 Points -3%
HTC One A9	3911 Points +41%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	2730 Points -2%
Sony Xperia XA	4046 Points +46%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	3296 Points +19%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	12953 ms *
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL	13525 ms * -4%
HTC One A9	11054 ms * +15%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	13046 ms * -1%
Sony Xperia XA	9610 ms * +26%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	11843 ms * +9%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	48 Points
HTC One A9	69 Points +44%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	47 Points -2%
Sony Xperia XA	72 Points +50%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	52 Points +8%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	17.09 Points
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL	17.53 Points +3%
HTC One A9	24.79 Points +45%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	16.8 Points -2%
Sony Xperia XA	27.5 Points +61%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	20.83 Points +22%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	144.1 MB/s
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL	130.6 MB/s -9%
HTC One A9	187.6 MB/s +30%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	147 MB/s +2%
Sony Xperia XA	240.4 MB/s +67%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	131.4 MB/s -9%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	43.95 MB/s
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL	31.1 MB/s -29%
HTC One A9	39.61 MB/s -10%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	72 MB/s +64%
Sony Xperia XA	68.6 MB/s +56%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	22.33 MB/s -49%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	17.9 MB/s
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL	9.1 MB/s -49%
HTC One A9	10 MB/s -44%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	21 MB/s +17%
Sony Xperia XA	22.05 MB/s +23%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	22.79 MB/s +27%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	28.31 MB/s
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL	3.6 MB/s -87%
HTC One A9	3.61 MB/s -87%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	11.6 MB/s -59%
Sony Xperia XA	10.6 MB/s -63%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	5.11 MB/s -82%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	65.5 MB/s
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL	38.43 MB/s -41%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	79.8 MB/s +22%
Sony Xperia XA	72.9 MB/s +11%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	51.1 MB/s
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL	18.93 MB/s -63%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	46.61 MB/s -9%
Sony Xperia XA	50.7 MB/s -1%

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Settings	Value
	high	29 fps
	very low	29 fps

Dead Trigger 2
	Settings	Value
	high	60 fps

Max. Load

Idle


37.8 °C	34 °C	31.9 °C
38.8 °C	33.5 °C	31.4 °C
37.8 °C	34 °C	31 °C

Maximum: 38.8 °C
Average: 34.5 °C


32.6 °C	34 °C	35.4 °C
31.4 °C	33.4 °C	34.8 °C
31.9 °C	33.3 °C	35.6 °C

Maximum: 35.6 °C
Average: 33.6 °C

Power Supply (max.) 42.1 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-350

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.5 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Lenovo Moto G4 Play audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (67.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 40.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Sony Xperia XA audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.08 / 0.22 Watt
Idle	0.68 / 1.58 / 1.61 Watt
Load	3.36 / 3.91 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Lenovo Moto G4 Play 2800 mAh	Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL 5000 mAh	HTC One A9 mAh	Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 3100 mAh	Sony Xperia XA 2300 mAh	Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 mAh
Power Consumption		-50%	-12%	14%	-11%	18%
Idle Minimum *	0.68	1.15 -69%	0.9 -32%	0.61 10%	0.72 -6%	0.4 41%
Idle Average *	1.58	2.09 -32%	1.2 24%	1.41 11%	1.5 5%	1 37%
Idle Maximum *	1.61	2.17 -35%	1.4 13%	1.51 6%	1.57 2%	1.2 25%
Load Average *	3.36	5.38 -60%	3.8 -13%	2.56 24%	3.48 -4%	2.9 14%
Load Maximum *	3.91	6.08 -55%	5.9 -51%	3.1 21%	6.04 -54%	5 -28%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		33h 18min
WiFi Websurfing		10h 30min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		11h 23min
Load (maximum brightness)		5h 06min

	Lenovo Moto G4 Play 2800 mAh	Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL 5000 mAh	HTC One A9 mAh	Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 3100 mAh	Sony Xperia XA 2300 mAh	Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 mAh
Battery Runtime		52%	-40%	2%	-46%	-16%
Reader / Idle	1998		1154 -42%	1599 -20%	775 -61%	1364 -32%
H.264	683		465 -32%	658 -4%	460 -33%	677 -1%
WiFi v1.3	630	959 52%	368 -42%	643 2%	353 -44%	526 -17%
Load	306		176 -42%	402 31%	170 -44%	264 -14%

Pros

+ 优秀的高清屏幕

+ 安卓6.0 Marshmallow

+ LTE

+ 使用中保持清凉

+ 高负载下不会降频

+ 电池续航长

Cons

- 安静的扬声器

- 一般的相机

- 不支持NFC

- 配件较少

In review: Lenovo Moto G4 Play. Test model provided by Lenovo Germany.

“摩托罗拉的Moto G是一台搭配了引人瞩目的独特功能的中端智能手机。”我们曾经在对Moto G 第三代的评测中得出了这样的结论。这也同样适用于Moto G4。我们的测试机结合了优秀的硬件和不错的性能，而没有任何明显的缺陷。相比前代机型，Moto G4配备了更快的处理器，更大存储空间，相似的屏幕，但售价却有所降低。如果你需要一台实惠而优秀的智能手机，我们建议考虑这台159欧元（约1173人民币）的Moto G4 Play。