Notebookcheck Logo

摩托罗拉 Moto G85 智能手机评测--配备几乎无边框 120Hz 显示屏的中端手机

全新设计。 如果你正在寻找一款超亮 OLED 屏幕的智能手机，价格在 300 美元左右，那么摩托罗拉 Moto G85 可能是你的理想之选。此外，它的显示屏周围几乎没有边框。但这款中端手机在我们的测试中表现如何呢？
Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

目前，摩托罗拉 Moto G85 5G 是 Moto G 系列中最昂贵的机型。它的价格约为 380 美元，比其前代产品 摩托 G84.它没有配备更多存储空间，总体而言，只做了一些改动。不过，它保留了一些老的优点，如Android 和相当轻的重量。

传统上，中端市场的竞争相当激烈，因此问题在于，这是否足以让 Moto G85 在今年站稳脚跟。为了回答这个问题，让我们来仔细看看这款手机。

Motorola Moto G85 (Moto G80 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 8 x 2 - 2.3 GHz, Kryo 660 Gold (2x Cortex-A78) / Silver (6x Cortex-A55)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 619
Memory
12 GB 
Display
6.50 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 405 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, P-OLED, 240Hz sampling rate, Gorilla Glass 5, glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB 
, 210 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, Card Reader: microSD (dedicated, up to 1TB) , 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B32/​B38/​B40/​B41/​B42), 5G (n1/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n20/​n26/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n77/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.6 x 161.9 x 73.1
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 30 Watt charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.79, phase comparison-AF, OIS, LED-flash, Videos @1080p/​60fps (Camera 1); 8.0MP, f/​2.2, wide angle lens, macro lens (Camera 2)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/​2.4, Videos @1080p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers (hybrid), USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, eSIM support, fanless
Weight
171 g
Price
349 Euro
Links
Motorola homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Version
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
74.7 %v8
08/2024
Motorola Moto G85
SD 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619		171 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.50"2400x1080
82.2 %v7 (old)
11/2023
Motorola Moto G84
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619		166.8 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.50"2400x1080
86.9 %v7 (old)
04/2024
Nothing Phone (2a)
Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4		190 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2412x1084
84.5 %v7 (old)
02/2024
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4		197 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.50"2340x1080
74 %v8
07/2024
Vivo V40 SE 5G
SD 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613		191 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080

外壳 - 几乎无边框的显示屏

摩托罗拉显然在努力为其摩托罗拉 Moto G85 5G 提供新的功能。现在，屏幕玻璃的边角被拉伸了--而这一功能以前是摩托罗拉 Edge 系列高端手机的专利。这使其屏幕四周的边框显得更薄。

为了降低屏幕对损坏的敏感度，制造商安装了大猩猩 5 号玻璃，可适度防止划痕和损坏。

摩托罗拉在手机背面使用了不同的材料，这取决于你选择的颜色：我们的测试设备采用城市灰配色，背面为哑光塑料材质，看起来还是很有质感的。如果你选择了更活泼的钴蓝色或橄榄绿，你将得到一个人造皮革制成的背面。

事实上，两种背壳材料的重量甚至还略有不同：我们的机型仅重 171 克，而采用人造革背壳的机型则重 173 克。即便如此，就其屏幕尺寸而言，Moto G85 5G 仍然是一款非常轻巧的智能手机。

它的制造质量非常好，徒手也无法将手机折弯或凹陷。相机模块内衬为亮面塑料，尽管材料不同，但与背面非常贴合--这要归功于过渡处的轻微弧度。

手机没有防水或防尘保护。

尺寸比较

❌
163.17 mm 75.81 mm 7.99 mm 191 g161.74 mm 76.32 mm 8.55 mm 190 g161.9 mm 73.1 mm 7.6 mm 171 g161 mm 76.5 mm 8.3 mm 197 g160 mm 74.4 mm 7.6 mm 166.8 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性 - eSIM 支持

256 GB 的大容量存储和 12 GB 的 RAM 在同价位机型中算是不错的配置，但其前代产品--Moto G84 Moto G84

手机底部有一个 USB-C 端口，可用于充电和数据传输。不过，只能以 USB 2.0 的速度使用。不支持向外部显示器输出有线图像。

手机配备了 NFC 功能，因此可以处理移动支付交易。您可以在 Moto G85 上安装 nano SIM 卡，它还支持 eSIM 卡，因此可以使用双 SIM 卡。

首页: 麦克风
首页: 麦克风
底部SIM 卡插槽、麦克风、USB-C 接口、扬声器
底部SIM 卡插槽、麦克风、USB-C 接口、扬声器
右：待机键、音量键
右：待机键、音量键
左：无连接
左：无连接

microSD 读卡器

如果要插入 microSD 卡，还有一个单独的插槽。在我们的复制测试中，虽然读卡器的速度比前代机型稍慢，但与同价位的其他智能手机相比，它的传输速率仍然很稳定。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
48.5 MB/s +40%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
34.6 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
27.4 MB/s -21%
Vivo V40 SE 5G
Adreno 613, SD 4 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
7.7 MB/s -78%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Motorola Moto G84 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø39.1 (31.5-48.4)
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø33.1 (17.6-53.8)
Vivo V40 SE 5G Adreno 613, SD 4 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø25.1 (20-29.5)
Motorola Moto G84 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø78.1 (26.1-83.5)
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø75.1 (39.1-107.7)
Vivo V40 SE 5G Adreno 613, SD 4 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø36.9 (22.3-43.4)

软件 - 几乎库存Android 14

手机预装了Android 14，摩托罗拉利用各种应用程序实现其专有功能。

例如，你可以使用 Moto 应用程序来控制屏幕边缘的通知灯，当接到电话或信息时，通知灯就会亮起。它还提供如何使用手机以及如何个性化手机的提示。

Moto Secure 应用程序捆绑了大量安全功能，如网络钓鱼检测或敏感文件安全文件夹。

Smart Connect 将连接智能电视、显示器、个人电脑或平板电脑等其他设备的功能整合在一起。有很多选项可供选择，如在其他设备上显示智能手机上的应用程序，或使用触摸屏控制其他设备。

摩托罗拉将在 4 年内（具体到 2028 年 6 月）为该设备提供安全更新，以及三个主要的Android 更新。这使该制造商在更新期限方面处于领先地位。

可持续性

我们找不到关于摩托罗拉 Moto G85 5G 生命周期内二氧化碳消耗量的分析。

在包装方面，摩托罗拉采用了最薄的包装盒，这也得益于它没有电源装置。包装盒只用一种颜色的大豆油墨印刷，手机包装完全不使用塑料。

自修仍然相当困难，但至少摩托罗拉现在已经与 iFixit 合作，后者已经为许多旧设备提供了备件和说明。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 也适用于导航目的

Moto G85 5G 只能使用 Wi-Fi 5 作为最快的 Wi-Fi 标准。虽然这在这个价位的手机中并不罕见，但这款 Nothing Phone (2a)证明，你也可以获得更快的 Wi-Fi。

由于传输速率在 316 和 373 MBit/s 之间（在我们的测试中也非常稳定），这款手机可以实现快速数据传输，但并不能完全利用千兆互联网连接。

Moto G85 可能是一款 5G 手机，但绝不是一款世界手机。在去更远的地方旅行之前，您应该了解一下这款智能手机在目的地国家是否也能用于连接网络，因为有些国家不支持 5G 和 4G 频率。

这款手机的蜂窝接收质量虽然比不上高端手机，但对于日常使用来说绝对够用--正如我们测试期间的各种抽查所显示的那样。

Networking
Motorola Moto G85
iperf3 receive AXE11000
341 (min: 322) MBit/s ∼44%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
361 (min: 316) MBit/s ∼51%
Motorola Moto G84
iperf3 receive AXE11000
326 (min: 319) MBit/s ∼42%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
358 (min: 334) MBit/s ∼50%
Nothing Phone (2a)
iperf3 receive AXE11000
782 (min: 633) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
680 (min: 417) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
872 (min: 464) MBit/s ∼60%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
914 (min: 902) MBit/s ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
339 (min: 325) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
304 (min: 288) MBit/s ∼43%
Vivo V40 SE 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
337 (min: 325) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
368 (min: 321) MBit/s ∼52%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
692 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
712 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1462 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1351 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼100%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Motorola Moto G85; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø341 (322-347)
Motorola Moto G85; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø361 (316-373)
外部 GPS 测试
外部 GPS 测试
可用的卫星网络
可用的卫星网络

如果你带着 Moto G85 走到户外，它能很快确定自己的位置，精度通常为 3 米。它支持最重要的卫星网络。不过，Moto G85 并没有使用 SBAS 来获得更高的精确度。

为了展示摩托罗拉智能手机在日常生活中的导航准确性，我们进行了一次 9.3 公里的自行车旅行。我们使用 Garmin Venu 2 智能手表作为对比设备。

事实证明，Moto G85 5G 在日常导航任务中相当有用，即使在更详细地查看一些弯道时，它也会稍稍偏离路线。

摩托罗拉 Moto G85 定位服务 - 概述
摩托罗拉 Moto G85 定位服务 - 概述
摩托罗拉摩托 G85 位置服务 - 转折点
摩托罗拉摩托 G85 位置服务 - 转折点
摩托罗拉 Moto G85 位置服务 - 城市
摩托罗拉 Moto G85 位置服务 - 城市
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 转折点
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 转折点
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 城市
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 城市

电话功能和通话质量 - 噪音过滤效果差

摩托罗拉 Moto G85 5G 使用谷歌的标准电话应用程序，该应用程序随Android 提供。不过，也可以安装其他电话应用程序，而且运行起来没有任何问题。

我们通过几次测试通话检验了手机的通话质量。通过听筒，我们的通话伙伴听起来很容易理解，但有时会有点闷。麦克风清晰地记录了我们的声音。

通过扬声器通话时声音很大，但没有过度调制。在这种情况下，对方的声音听起来也有点闷，但还是很容易听清。对方也能通过免提麦克风清楚地听到我们的声音，但背景噪音没有被很好地过滤掉。

照相机 - 质量波动

使用前置摄像头拍摄的照片
使用前置摄像头拍摄的照片

与 Moto G84 相比，摩托罗拉仅更改了相机系统的一些小细节。 摩托 G84.该手机的主摄像头分辨率仍为 5000 万像素（通常像素分级为 1250 万像素），但感光度略高。超广角摄像头的传感器没有变化。

前置摄像头的分辨率提高了一倍，达到 3200 万像素（通常像素分级为 800 万像素），感光度也比上一代产品略高。这使得自拍效果还不错，不过有时色彩会显得有些不自然的过饱和，暗部的细节也很少。

主摄像头拍摄特写对象的效果不错，镜头还能营造出漂亮的背景虚化效果。但是，如果你看一下我们周围的照片，就会发现细节并不丰富，有些地方还有点模糊。对比度也不是最好的。

在光线很暗、对比度很高的情况下，烛火显示得很好，但我们注意到照片的暗部几乎没有任何细节。

视频的最大录制速度为 1080p，每秒 60fps，这在同价位产品中还算不错。虽然自动对焦偶尔需要一段时间才能找到正确的设置，但录制的视频质量还不错。另一方面，亮度调节很快就能完成。

超广角摄像头非常适合拍摄快照，但照片不宜放大太多，否则细节会很差。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera plantMain camera surroundingsMain camera low lightUltra-wide-angle camera

此外，我们还在实验室条件下对 Moto G85 的主摄像头进行了测试，在光线非常好且照度仅为 1 lux 的情况下拍摄了测试图和彩色图。

在非常明亮的光线下，清晰度问题已经很明显，而在非常暗的光线下拍摄的照片几乎无法辨认出任何东西。

ColorChecker
5.8 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
2 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
19.5 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G85: 6.44 ∆E min: 2 - max: 19.51 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
54.3 ∆E
39.1 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
44.4 ∆E
60.7 ∆E
52.9 ∆E
34.7 ∆E
42.3 ∆E
28 ∆E
63.7 ∆E
63.2 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
47.2 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
75.4 ∆E
43.1 ∆E
41.8 ∆E
89.8 ∆E
70.2 ∆E
51.5 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G85: 46.21 ∆E min: 13.38 - max: 89.82 ∆E

配件和保修 - 不含充电器

除了 USB 数据线和 SIM 卡工具外，该手机还配有一个硅胶保险杠。摩托罗拉没有通过其网站提供任何特殊配件。充电器的价格约为 20 美元。

只要在美国境内购买，摩托罗拉手机享有 12 个月的标准保修服务。

输入设备和操作 - 快速触摸屏

触摸屏每秒最多可扫描 240 次触摸输入，操作非常流畅。它能对输入做出快速反应，这还要归功于高达 120 Hz 的刷新率。

指纹传感器隐藏在屏幕后面，位置非常靠下。这对手掌较小的人来说是件好事，因为传感器很容易够到。不过，手大的人也可以方便地使用这一识别功能，只需在手指稍靠后的位置注册指纹即可。

您还可以使用前置摄像头和人工智能进行面部识别解锁。不过，由于它没有红外线深度传感器，这种识别方式比其他方法更容易受到操控。

直立式键盘
直立式键盘
水平键盘
水平键盘

显示屏 - 色彩准确、明亮的 OLED 屏幕

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

Moto G85 采用对角线为 6.5 英寸的 P-OLED 屏幕。它的亮度明显高于前代产品，在我们的测量中达到了 1,207 cd/m²。在显示较小的白色区域（APL18）时，该面板的亮度在我们的测试中甚至达到了 1,485 cd/m²。

这款手机不支持 HDR，但仍能在显示屏上显示高对比度的内容。

我们注意到，在亮度很低的情况下，PWM 闪烁频率约为 288 Hz。因此，敏感用户应在购买前试用该显示屏，以了解是否会出现闪烁问题。振幅相当低，仅为 5%，这可能会减轻一些问题。

1158
cd/m²		1139
cd/m²		1205
cd/m²
1174
cd/m²		1207
cd/m²		1199
cd/m²
1184
cd/m²		1142
cd/m²		1189
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 1207 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1177.4 cd/m² Minimum: 3.02 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 1207 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.36 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.95
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
Motorola Moto G85
P-OLED, 2400x1080, 6.5"		Motorola Moto G84
P-OLED, 2400x1080, 6.5"		Nothing Phone (2a)
AMOLED, 2412x1084, 6.7"		Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.5"		Vivo V40 SE 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Screen
-24%
-3%
-3%
-42%
Brightness middle
1207
894
-26%
1033
-14%
912
-24%
1206
0%
Brightness
1177
889
-24%
1042
-11%
928
-21%
1199
2%
Brightness Distribution
94
94
0%
96
2%
96
2%
97
3%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.36
1.1
19%
1.6
-18%
1.09
20%
2.3
-69%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.8
2.81
-0%
2.5
11%
2.26
19%
5
-79%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.4
3
-114%
1.2
14%
1.6
-14%
2.9
-107%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.252 98%
2.07 106%
2.251 98%
2.23 99%
CCT
6591 99%
7122 91%
6482 100%
6491 100%
6626 98%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 288.2 Hz
Amplitude: 5 %

The display backlight flickers at 288.2 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 288.2 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17271 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最低亮度
最低亮度
25 % 亮度
25 % 亮度
50 % 亮度
50 % 亮度
亮度 75
亮度 75
亮度为 100
亮度为 100

具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列

屏幕的色彩描绘非常准确，让您可以选择将其用于专业用途。最佳色彩配置文件为 "自然"。

它的响应时间非常短，这意味着它几乎能立即对输入做出反应。

卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN sRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN sRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN DCI P3 色彩空间
CalMAN DCI P3 色彩空间
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 饱和度

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1 ms rise
↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.1 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.1 ms rise
↘ 1.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.1 ms).

在室外，即使在明亮的环境中也能很好地阅读手机内容。遗憾的是，你无法完全避免反光，因此在阴凉处使用会更舒适。

几乎从任何角度观察，它的屏幕都不会出现亮度变化，这是一个非常好的结果。

室外使用
室外使用
视角
视角

性能--新 SoC，还是不新？

摩托罗拉采用了一种全新的 SoC，即 骁龙 6 代 3几个月前才推出。然而，它并不像你想象的那么新：在许多方面，它的规格与 骁龙 695只是处理器部分的时钟速度略有提高，对摄像头的支持也有所调整。

因此，Moto G85 提供了坚实的中端动力，性能略优于前代产品 Moto G84。此外，这款手机在浏览菜单时也能保持流畅，而且还能使用不太复杂的应用程序进行多任务处理。

与高端 SoC 相比，只有在使用非常密集的应用程序时才能明显感觉到速度上的差异。

Geekbench 6.2 | Geekbench 5.5 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | Geekbench ML
Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 2930, n=143, last 2 years)
1361 Points +45%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
1128 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
976 Points +4%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
940 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
  ()
940 Points 0%
Vivo V40 SE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192
920 Points -2%
Motorola Moto G84
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
911 Points -3%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 7408, n=143, last 2 years)
3798 Points +84%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
2592 Points +25%
Vivo V40 SE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192
2252 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
2152 Points +4%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
2067 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
  ()
2067 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G84
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
2058 Points 0%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2138, n=180, last 2 years)
941 Points +34%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
890 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
751 Points +7%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
703 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
  ()
703 Points 0%
Vivo V40 SE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192
687 Points -2%
Motorola Moto G84
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
674 Points -4%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=180, last 2 years)
3144 Points +64%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
2177 Points +14%
Vivo V40 SE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192
2071 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
2042 Points +7%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
1917 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
  ()
1917 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G84
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
1839 Points -4%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 2162423, n=82, last 2 years)
1159866 Points +141%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
693939 Points +44%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
481436 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
  ()
481436 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
474853 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G84
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
461567 Points -4%
Vivo V40 SE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192
428748 Points -11%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
13748 Points +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 21385, n=191, last 2 years)
12476 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
12367 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
  ()
12367 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G84
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
11732 Points -5%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
10924 Points -12%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 1474, n=152, last 2 years)
851 Points +37%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
695 Points +12%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
619 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
  ()
619 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
598 Points -3%
Vivo V40 SE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192
598 Points -3%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11438, n=151, last 2 years)
6096 Points +47%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
4147 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
  ()
4147 Points 0%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
4115 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G84
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
3767 Points -9%
Vivo V40 SE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192
3291 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
Points -100%
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)
9976 Points +15%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
8686 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
  ()
8686 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G84
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
8231 Points -5%
Vivo V40 SE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192
6922 Points -20%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
6734 Points -22%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)
6575 Points +27%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
5162 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
  ()
5162 Points 0%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
4567 Points -12%
Motorola Moto G84
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
4179 Points -19%
Vivo V40 SE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192
4031 Points -22%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)
15988 Points +235%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
10646 Points +123%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
4772 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
  ()
4772 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G84
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
4346 Points -9%
Vivo V40 SE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192
2970 Points -38%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (747 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)
1541 Points +12%
Vivo V40 SE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192
1415 Points +2%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
1382 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
  ()
1382 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G84
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
1348 Points -2%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
876 Points -37%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
26315 Points +363%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 78964, n=145, last 2 years)
17460 Points +207%
Vivo V40 SE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192
5984 Points +5%
Motorola Moto G84
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
5758 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
5689 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
  ()
5689 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
4988 Points -12%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 245629, n=128, last 2 years)
18588 Points +4315%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
11407 Points +2610%
Vivo V40 SE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192
1615 Points +284%
Motorola Moto G84
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
478 Points +14%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
421 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
  ()
421 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
Points -100%
Geekbench ML
0.6 TensorFlow Lite CPU
Average of class Smartphone
  (246 - 1342, n=34, last 2 years)
824 Points +83%
Vivo V40 SE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192
455 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
450 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
  ()
450 Points 0%
0.6 TensorFlow Lite GPU
Average of class Smartphone
  (123 - 1478, n=33, last 2 years)
746 Points +197%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
251 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
  ()
251 Points 0%
Vivo V40 SE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192
123 Points -51%
0.6 TensorFlow Lite NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone
  (186 - 3410, n=29, last 2 years)
647 Points +248%
Vivo V40 SE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192
263 Points +41%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
186 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
  ()
186 Points 0%

其 GPU 采用了与前代产品相同的图形解决方案，即 Adreno 619但它的时钟频率略有提高，因为 Moto G85 在我们的基准测试中多跑了几帧。

总的来说，高分辨率和显示屏原生分辨率下的复杂图形并不一定是这款显卡的主要优势，但它在减少细节和较旧的基准测试中仍然表现出色。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1156 Points +182%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
631 Points +54%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
410 Points
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
352 Points -14%
Vivo V40 SE 5G
Adreno 613, SD 4 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
155 Points -62%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1153 Points +176%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
640 Points +53%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
418 Points
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
361 Points -14%
Vivo V40 SE 5G
Adreno 613, SD 4 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
157 Points -62%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4259 Points +170%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2401 Points +52%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1578 Points
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1193 Points -24%
Vivo V40 SE 5G
Adreno 613, SD 4 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
665 Points -58%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4140 Points +163%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2367 Points +50%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1575 Points
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1203 Points -24%
Vivo V40 SE 5G
Adreno 613, SD 4 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
663 Points -58%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4006 Points
Vivo V40 SE 5G
Adreno 613, SD 4 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3612 Points
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3506 Points
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3125 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6935 Points
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4098 Points
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2968 Points
Vivo V40 SE 5G
Adreno 613, SD 4 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1591 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5966 Points
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3804 Points
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3073 Points
Vivo V40 SE 5G
Adreno 613, SD 4 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1817 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
88 fps
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
87 fps -1%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
83 fps -6%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -32%
Vivo V40 SE 5G
Adreno 613, SD 4 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
48 fps -45%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
159 fps +59%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
100 fps
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
97 fps -3%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
93 fps -7%
Vivo V40 SE 5G
Adreno 613, SD 4 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
54 fps -46%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps +33%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
49 fps +9%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
45 fps
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
42 fps -7%
Vivo V40 SE 5G
Adreno 613, SD 4 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps -44%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps +92%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
63 fps +24%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
51 fps
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps -8%
Vivo V40 SE 5G
Adreno 613, SD 4 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
27 fps -47%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps +78%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
38 fps +19%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
32 fps
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps -6%
Vivo V40 SE 5G
Adreno 613, SD 4 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -47%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps +86%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
41 fps +14%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
36 fps
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps -6%
Vivo V40 SE 5G
Adreno 613, SD 4 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps -47%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34 fps +79%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps +11%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -11%
Vivo V40 SE 5G
Adreno 613, SD 4 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.5 fps -55%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps +90%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps +14%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps -5%
Vivo V40 SE 5G
Adreno 613, SD 4 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.6 fps -54%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps +154%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps +15%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps -8%
Vivo V40 SE 5G
Adreno 613, SD 4 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.9 fps -55%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21 fps +144%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
10 fps +16%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.6 fps
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.8 fps -9%
Vivo V40 SE 5G
Adreno 613, SD 4 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4 fps -53%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
48 fps +129%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps +10%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps -10%
Vivo V40 SE 5G
Adreno 613, SD 4 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.9 fps -53%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps +130%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
28 fps +22%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps -9%
Vivo V40 SE 5G
Adreno 613, SD 4 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps -52%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9.4 fps +147%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4.5 fps +18%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.8 fps
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.5 fps -8%
Vivo V40 SE 5G
Adreno 613, SD 4 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1.7 fps -55%

摩托罗拉手机在网上冲浪时表现出色。这也可能是由于使用了较新的 Chrome 浏览器版本，但对于一款中端手机来说，它所达到的基准值确实不错。

实际上，即使是复杂的网站，加载速度也非常快，有时在滚动时已经显示了图片。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | Speedometer 3.0
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=158, last 2 years)
111.8 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G85 (Chrome 127)
110.527 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 ()
110.5 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G84 (Chrome 118)
102.69 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G (Chrome 122)
97.837 Points -11%
Vivo V40 SE 5G (Chrome 125)
88.371 Points -20%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)
76.624 Points -31%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 445, n=146, last 2 years)
120 runs/min +31%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Chrome 123.0.6312.99)
104 runs/min +13%
Motorola Moto G85 (Chrome 127)
91.8 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 ()
91.8 runs/min 0%
Vivo V40 SE 5G (Chrome 125)
87.8 runs/min -4%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G (Chrome 122)
74.3 runs/min -19%
Motorola Moto G84 (Chrome 118)
72.6 runs/min -21%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)
125 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G (Chrome 122)
109 Points +15%
Motorola Moto G84 (Chrome 118)
107 Points +13%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 212, n=149, last 2 years)
106.4 Points +12%
Motorola Moto G85 (Chrome 127)
95 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 ()
95 Points 0%
Vivo V40 SE 5G
Points -100%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=199, last 2 years)
34633 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G85 (Chrome 127)
34162 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 ()
34162 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G (Chrome 122)
32736 Points -4%
Vivo V40 SE 5G (Chrome 125)
31853 Points -7%
Motorola Moto G84 (Chrome 118)
30733 Points -10%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)
18562 Points -46%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 28190, n=157, last 2 years)
1673 ms * -43%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)
1569.6 ms * -34%
Motorola Moto G84 (Chrome 118)
1309.3 ms * -12%
Vivo V40 SE 5G (Chrome 125)
1253.9 ms * -7%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G (Chrome 122)
1243.5 ms * -6%
Motorola Moto G85 (Chrome 127)
1172 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 ()
1172 ms * -0%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 16.2, n=44, last 2 years)
8.13 runs/min +46%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Chrome 123.0.6312.99)
6.62 runs/min +19%
Motorola Moto G85 (Chrome 127)
5.55 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 ()
5.55 runs/min 0%
Vivo V40 SE 5G
runs/min -100%

* ... smaller is better

虽然该设备的 UFS 2.2 存储是这个价格范围内的标准配置，但一些对比设备显示，在这个预算内有时可以买到更快的组件。其中一个例子是 Nothing Phone (2a)它的 UFS 3.1 闪存速度明显更快--至少在连续读写时是这样。

但在复制数据时，等待时间往往要稍长一些，复杂应用的加载时间也不总是那么短。但总的来说，Moto G85 的存储速度绝对足够日常使用。

Motorola Moto G85Motorola Moto G84Nothing Phone (2a)Vivo V40 SE 5GAverage 256 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-11%
58%
26%
26%
106%
Sequential Read 256KB
529.8
506.9
-4%
1028.37
94%
956.35
81%
898 ?(482 - 1009, n=31)
69%
1729 ?(226 - 4512, n=194, last 2 years)
226%
Sequential Write 256KB
525.3
511.5
-3%
952
81%
808.91
54%
700 ?(369 - 913, n=31)
33%
1338 ?(57.5 - 3875, n=194, last 2 years)
155%
Random Read 4KB
220.7
195.8
-11%
273.19
24%
201.11
-9%
226 ?(99.7 - 291, n=31)
2%
266 ?(22.2 - 543, n=194, last 2 years)
21%
Random Write 4KB
237
174.7
-26%
311.8
32%
181.2
-24%
235 ?(99.2 - 301, n=31)
-1%
292 ?(9.4 - 709, n=194, last 2 years)
23%

游戏 - 大部分为 30 帧游戏

它的游戏性能在同类手机中非常典型：在低设置下，运行某些游戏时可以达到 40fps，但通常只能达到 30fps。

这足以保证相当流畅的游戏，但对于雄心勃勃的游戏玩家来说可能还不够。我们使用GameBench 对帧速率进行了测量。

通过手机触摸屏和位置传感器控制游戏没有任何问题。

源泉冲击
源泉冲击
暗黑破坏神不朽
暗黑破坏神不朽
0510152025303540Tooltip
Motorola Moto G85; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø29.8 (15-39)
Motorola Moto G85; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø29.3 (11-30)
Motorola Moto G85; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø38.7 (30-41)
Motorola Moto G85; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø29.3 (18-30)
Motorola Moto G85; Diablo Immortal; Medium Mobile Low: Ø29.7 (25-31)
Motorola Moto G85; Diablo Immortal; Ultra Mobile Very High: Ø29.4 (21-31)

排放 - 会发热

温度

在长时间使用后，我们测得手机外壳的最高温度可达 45.9 °C。将设备拿在手上就能明显感觉到这一点。由于我们是在室温下测量的，因此在炎热的天气里温度会升高得更多。

值得庆幸的是，SoC 似乎并不在意这些温度，即使在多次基准测试运行后仍能保持其性能。

Max. Load
 45.3 °C41.2 °C38.6 °C 
 45.9 °C41.2 °C38.3 °C 
 45.6 °C40.8 °C38 °C 
Maximum: 45.9 °C
Average: 41.7 °C
36.9 °C42.2 °C43.3 °C
38.3 °C41 °C45.3 °C
38.1 °C41.5 °C45.3 °C
Maximum: 45.3 °C
Average: 41.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42.3 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.7 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.9 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.3 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.8 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % 0%
Vivo V40 SE 5G
Adreno 613, SD 4 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % 0%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 %
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.2 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.1 % 0%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.6 % +1%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.3 % 0%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.1 %
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99 % 0%
Vivo V40 SE 5G
Adreno 613, SD 4 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
97.9 % -1%
05101520Tooltip
Motorola Moto G85 Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.5 (2.49-2.51)
Motorola Moto G84 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.15 (2.14-2.16)
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø6.89 (6.88-6.91)
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø3.86 (3.85-3.88)
Vivo V40 SE 5G Adreno 613, SD 4 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.94 (0.927-0.946)
Motorola Moto G85 Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø9.43 (9.4-9.46)
Motorola Moto G84 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.2 (7.19-7.22)
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø24.7 (24.6-24.8)
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.9 (13.8-14)
Vivo V40 SE 5G Adreno 613, SD 4 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø3.97 (3.97-3.99)
Vivo V40 SE 5G Adreno 613, SD 4 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø3.98 (3.98-3.99)
正面热图
正面热图
热图返回
热图返回

发言人

Moto G85 5G 配备了立体声扬声器，除了底部边缘的扬声器外，听筒还被用作第二个扬声器。作为一款中端手机，该设备的音质并不差，甚至还带有一丝中低音。

即便如此，在高音量时声音也会变得高音偏重。如果稍微降低音量，扬声器的声音会更加动听。音响发烧友可能更喜欢连接耳机或外置扬声器，这可以通过 USB-C 端口和适配器或蓝牙实现。

支持用于无线声音传输的所有重要音频编解码器，包括 Opus、LDAC 或 LHDC V2 - V5 等更奇特的编解码器。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.6392538.244.83129.227.64031.228.4503941.26324.523.88018.719.610023.325.612517.328.316014.734.820010.439.325012.542.631512.349.54009.656.650010.160.963013.459.78001369.4100015.571.4125010.668.7160010.369.1200010.770.8250011.270.3315013.168.5400013.669.3500014.664.7630014.465.8800015.463.21000016.363.81250016.363.1160001752.2SPL25.680.2N0.745.6median 13.4median 63.2Delta2.311.133.234.631.837.118.235.923.436.632.440.519.438.318.836.617.640.113.841.515.945.41645.116.451.615.155.313.854.712.965.413.869.213.574.513.175.313.874.612.575.41378.813.280.914.582.613.483.41483.115.280.51576.213.671176715.5582691.40.783.5median 13.8median 74.5112.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Moto G85Vivo V40 SE 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Moto G85 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Vivo V40 SE 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 充电功率高达 30 瓦

耗电量

这款智能手机的功耗值与其前代产品非常相似，鉴于这两款系统芯片的相似性，这并不奇怪。只有在非常高负荷的情况下才会需要更多的电量，但与同价位的其他手机相比，它的总体功耗很低。

Moto G85 的充电功率可达 30 瓦。这款智能手机可与我们测试的所有充电器配合使用，充电时间最长可达 2 小时。这款手机不支持无线充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1 / 1.2 / 1.4 Watt
Load midlight 3.4 / 6.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Motorola Moto G85
5000 mAh		Motorola Moto G84
5000 mAh		Nothing Phone (2a)
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
5000 mAh		Vivo V40 SE 5G
5000 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
3%
-27%
-21%
-55%
0%
-29%
Idle Minimum *
1
1
-0%
0.81
19%
1
-0%
1.23
-23%
1 ?()
-0%
0.907 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=148, last 2 years)
9%
Idle Average *
1.2
1.3
-8%
2.01
-68%
1.5
-25%
2.2
-83%
1.2 ?()
-0%
1.444 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=148, last 2 years)
-20%
Idle Maximum *
1.4
1.4
-0%
2.07
-48%
1.7
-21%
2.24
-60%
1.4 ?()
-0%
1.607 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=148, last 2 years)
-15%
Load Average *
3.4
3.5
-3%
4.16
-22%
4.6
-35%
3.4 ?()
-0%
6.25 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years)
-84%
Load Maximum *
6.8
5
26%
7.91
-16%
8.3
-22%
6.8 ?()
-0%
9.24 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years)
-36%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567Tooltip
Motorola Moto G85; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.81 (2.51-7.07)
Motorola Moto G85; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.098 (0.994-1.414)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345Tooltip
Motorola Moto G85; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.06 (3.41-5.66)
Motorola Moto G85; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.098 (0.994-1.414)

运行时间

使用摩托罗拉 Moto G85，你可以通过 Wi-Fi 上网近 15 个小时，然后电池才会耗尽。虽然比上一代产品略逊一筹，但对于这个价位的智能手机来说，它的电池续航时间还是相当不错的。这应该能让你正常使用两天。

如果你喜欢看电影或连续剧，并确保提前下载，那么你可以观看 18:34 小时而无需充电。

不过，"Nothing Phone（2a）"的续航时间并不长。 Nothing Phone (2a)的电池容量为 5,000 毫安--就像 Moto G85 一样，可以获得更长的续航时间。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
32h 54min
WiFi Websurfing
14h 54min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
18h 34min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 46min
Motorola Moto G85
5000 mAh		Motorola Moto G84
5000 mAh		Nothing Phone (2a)
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
5000 mAh		Vivo V40 SE 5G
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-3%
20%
-15%
16%
Reader / Idle
1974
1997
1%
2522
28%
1763
-11%
H.264
1114
1002
-10%
1513
36%
941
-16%
WiFi v1.3
894
908
2%
1011
13%
770
-14%
1034
16%
Load
286
277
-3%
293
2%
228
-20%

Pros

+ 稳定美观的手机壳
+ 轻巧的智能手机
+ 明亮、色彩准确的显示屏
+ ...边框非常窄
+ 负载情况下仅有轻微节流
+ 大量蓝牙音频编解码器
+ 运行时间适合日常使用
+ 定位精度高
+ 支持 eSIM

Cons

- 低亮度时 PWM 闪烁
- 无 IP 认证
- 摄像头拍摄的照片有时细节模糊
- 在负载情况下温度较高
- 不带充电器
- 价格相对昂贵

评价--轻巧、美观，但不寻常？

摩托罗拉 Moto G85 评论
摩托罗拉 Moto G85 评论

摩托罗拉 Moto G85 拥有明亮的 AMOLED 屏幕、高品质的外壳（也有时尚的颜色可供选择）以及适合 380 美元左右价位的性能。

不过，市场上也有一些同价位的手机在电池续航时间、Wi-Fi 速度和处理器性能方面明显领先，其中最著名的是 Nothing Phone (2a).

尽管如此，如果你正在寻找一款可靠的中端手机，并希望获得良好的定位服务、Android 和 eSIM 支持，摩托罗拉 Moto G85 5G 仍然是一个不错的选择。

在购买之前，你应该试一下屏幕，因为虽然它超亮，色彩还原也很好，但在某些情况下会闪烁，这可能会让一些人感到厌烦。此外，当拍摄对象距离较远时，你还经常不得不接受其相机照片缺乏细节和清晰度的问题。

摩托罗拉 Moto G85 5G 拥有明亮的 AMOLED 显示屏和吸引人的外壳，给人留下了深刻的印象。尽管如此，由于性能和电池续航时间的原因，它还是无法与某些中端竞争对手相抗衡。

Nothing Phone (2a) 以及它的前身--Moto G84--现在可以以更便宜的价格买到。

价格和供应情况

在撰写本文时，Moto G85 尚未在美国发售。

请注意：我们更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不可比。更多信息 请点击此处.

Motorola Moto G85 - 08/08/2024 v8
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
84%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
90%
Connectivity
44 / 69 → 63%
Weight
92%
Battery
90%
Display
90%
Games Performance
8 / 55 → 14%
Application Performance
58 / 85 → 68%
AI Performance
19%
Temperature
86%
Noise
100%
Audio
69 / 90 → 77%
Camera
59%
Average
61%
75%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
30%
Packaging
90%
Power Use
95.9%
Repairability
19%
Software Updates
53.3%
Total Sustainability Score: 48%

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 摩托罗拉 Moto G85 智能手机评测--配备几乎无边框 120Hz 显示屏的中端手机
Florian Schmitt, 2024-08-12 (Update: 2024-08-15)