Notebookcheck Logo

摩托罗拉 Moto G84 5G 智能手机评测--明亮的 OLED 屏幕和大量存储空间,售价不到 350 美元

纤薄多彩。

Moto G84 售价约为 320 美元。它采用明亮的 OLED 屏幕,机身小巧轻便。然而,它的中档竞争产品比比皆是,这就引出了一个问题:摩托罗拉 Moto G84 值得购买吗?摩托罗拉 Moto G84 值得购买吗?
5G ARM Android Smartphone
摩托罗拉 Moto G84

去年,摩托罗拉扩充了价格昂贵的 Edge 系列,而今年,该制造商又发布了一款新的中端 Moto G 顶级机型:Moto G84 售价约为 320 美元,配备大量存储空间和明亮的 OLED 屏幕。在外观上,摩托罗拉继续借鉴了 Pantone 的设计,选择了三种不同的色调供用户选择。

然而,在这个价位上活跃着许多高品质的竞争对手:除了三星和小米等顶级品牌外,竞争对手还包括 OnePlus 和卷土重来的Honor 。摩托罗拉 Moto G84 要想在众多竞争者中脱颖而出并非易事,但它无疑已经有了一个良好的开端。现在,让我们来仔细看看这款中端手机。

Motorola Moto G84 (Moto G80 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 8 x 1.7 - 2.2 GHz, Kryo 660 Gold (2x Cortex-A78) / Silver (6x Cortex-A55)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 619
Memory
12 GB 
Display
6.50 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 405 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, P-OLED, 240Hz sampling rate, glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB 
, 240 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm, Card Reader: microSD (shared, up to 1TB) , 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B32/​B38/​B40/​B41/​B42), 5G (n1/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n20/​n26/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n77/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.6 x 160 x 74.4
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 30 Watt charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.88, phase comparison-AF, OIS, LED-flash, Videos @1080p/​60fps (Camera 1); 8.0MP, f/​2.2, wide angle lens, macro lens (Camera 2)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.5, Videos @1080p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers (hybrid), charger, USB cable, SIM tool, bumper, 24 Months Warranty, FM radio, IP54-certified, SAR: 0.88W/​kg Head, 1.26W/​kg Body , fanless
Weight
166.8 g
Price
300 Euro
Amazon
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
82.2 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2023
Motorola Moto G84
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
166.8 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.50"2400x1080
81.4 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2023
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
195 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.72"2400x1080
81.4 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2023
Xiaomi Poco X5
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
190 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080
78.5 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2023
Honor X8a
Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2
179 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.70"2388x1080
84.9 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2023
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4
199 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2340x1080
Moto G84 颜色款式
Moto G84 颜色款式

打开摩托罗拉 Moto G84 的包装盒,映入眼帘的是仍相对较新的摩托罗拉香味,据说这种香味会增加制造商顶级机型的使用体验。这种香味不会让每个人都满意,但至少它被保存在 Moto G84 的包装盒内(与 Razr 和 Edge 机型不同),而且总的来说,这种香味并不浓烈。

这款手机的边角打磨设计略显明显,看起来很棒。得益于纤薄的机身和略小的 6.5 英寸屏幕,即使你的手比较小,也能轻松握住这款摩托罗拉手机。Moto G84 的重量约为 167 克,相当轻巧。

颜色包括棉花糖蓝(一种微妙的蓝色,看起来有点像浅灰色)、午夜蓝(看起来相当深灰)和鲜艳品红(一种浅红色,几乎是粉红色)。浅蓝色和品红色手机的背面覆盖有人造皮革,而深灰色手机的背面则是光滑的。

这款手机不防水也不防尘,只有一定程度的防水功能。

摩托罗拉 Moto G84
摩托罗拉 Moto G84
摩托罗拉 Moto G84
摩托罗拉 Moto G84

尺寸比较

165.88 mm 76.21 mm 7.98 mm 190 g165.5 mm 76 mm 8.3 mm 195 g162.9 mm 74.5 mm 7.5 mm 179 g161.3 mm 78.1 mm 8.2 mm 199 g160 mm 74.4 mm 7.6 mm 166.8 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性 - 存储丰富

Moto G84 拥有 12GB RAM 和 256GB 存储空间,制造商在 Moto G84 上表现得相当慷慨--在大多数情况下,在这个价格范围内,你不得不使用更少的配置。

Moto G84 还配备了 NFC 功能,这意味着你可以读取标签并使用谷歌支付(Google Pay)等移动支付服务。使用有线耳机的用户还可以期待一个经典的音频插孔:Moto G84 采用了这种连接方式,这意味着你不需要适配器。

它的 USB-C 端口只能通过 USB 2.0 内部连接,这意味着无法将有线图像输出到外部屏幕。通过应用程序 "Moto Connect "或 "Ready For",你可以使用 WiFi 连接显示器,甚至可以使用手机指定的桌面模式。

您可以在手机卡槽中放入两张 Nano SIM 卡或一张 microSD 卡和一张 SIM 卡。它不支持 eSIM 卡。

首页: 麦克风
首页: 麦克风
底部 3.5 毫米音频插孔、麦克风、USB-C 接口、扬声器
底部 3.5 毫米音频插孔、麦克风、USB-C 接口、扬声器
左:SIM 卡插槽
左:SIM 卡插槽
右侧待机键、音量摇杆
右侧待机键、音量摇杆

microSD 读卡器

在我们使用 Angelbird AV Pro V60 作为参考卡进行的基准测试中,无论是复制测试还是 CPDT 基准测试,microSD 读卡器的速度都非常快。除了充足的内部存储空间外,这是另一种快速存储数据的好方法。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
48.5 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
44.01 MB/s -9%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
27.13 MB/s -44%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
24.6 MB/s -49%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Motorola Moto G84 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø39.1 (31.5-48.4)
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø37 (28.7-44.4)
Xiaomi Poco X5 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø40 (29.3-50.7)
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø32 (22-43.6)
Motorola Moto G84 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø78.1 (26.1-83.5)
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø68.6 (26.9-79.1)
Xiaomi Poco X5 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø73.4 (32.4-80)
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø70 (39.2-78.2)

软件 - 股票Android ,但有赞助的应用程序

摩托罗拉在其智能手机上使用Android 13,几乎没有改变用户界面。所有重要功能都捆绑在 Moto 应用程序中,而安全设置则位于 Moto Secure 应用程序中。

最新的安全补丁是 2023 年 8 月发布的,这意味着在测试时,它仍然是最新的。根据规定,Moto G84 的安全更新将持续 3 年,即直到 2026 年 9 月。这款手机肯定还能看到Android 14,但摩托罗拉还没有提供任何关于其他操作系统的信息。

这款手机预装了不少第三方应用程序,但值得庆幸的是,它们可以很容易地卸载。

软件 摩托罗拉 Moto G84
软件 摩托罗拉 Moto G84
软件 摩托罗拉 Moto G84

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - WiFi 5,速率稳定

摩托罗拉 Moto G84 采用 WiFi 5 作为其最快的无线局域网标准,因此在同价位产品中表现出色。其速度在 319 到 358 MBit/s 之间,可以保持非常稳定。虽然不能完全使用千兆线路,也不能连接到 6 GHz 频率,但与同价位的其他手机相比,这款摩托罗拉手机仍然达到了不错的传输速率。

这款手机还支持 5G。它可以接入很多频段,这意味着你也可以在旅途中连接网络。遗憾的是,Moto G84 并不是一款真正意义上的全球通用手机,因为它缺少了一些更奇特的频段,尤其是 4G 频段。

在测试过程中,我们定期检查其接收质量,并将其与高端手机进行比较。Moto G84 在这方面做得很好,只是偶尔在接收显示屏上看到比更昂贵的智能手机少了一格。

Networking
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
326 (min: 319) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
358 (min: 334) MBit/s ∼49%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
330 (min: 290) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
357 (min: 269) MBit/s ∼49%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
344 (min: 173) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
364 (min: 183) MBit/s ∼50%
Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
333 (min: 276) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
367 (min: 351) MBit/s ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
634 (min: 610) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
679 (min: 653) MBit/s ∼94%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 receive AXE11000
711 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
725 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼100%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Motorola Moto G84; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø326 (319-333)
Motorola Moto G84; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø358 (334-370)
户外 GPS 测试
户外 GPS 测试
可用的卫星网络
可用的卫星网络

定位模块支持各种卫星网络,但不支持用于更精确定位的 SBAS。因此,手机的精确度保持在 3 米以内,当你带着手机走出户外时,很快就能实现。

为了提供更精确的实际分析,我们带着手机进行了一次自行车旅行。我们还将 Garmin Venu 2 戴在手腕上进行比较,这是一款具有极其精确的定位服务的智能手表。

两者记录的路线非常相似,从未显示我们骑过无法通过的地形,而且两者的高精确度都给人留下了深刻印象。因此,对于需要高精确度的导航用途,我们推荐使用 Moto G84。

摩托罗拉 Moto G84 定位服务 - 概述
摩托罗拉 Moto G84 定位服务 - 概述
摩托罗拉 Moto G84 位置服务 - 转折点
摩托罗拉 Moto G84 位置服务 - 转折点
摩托罗拉 Moto G84 位置服务 - 桥接
摩托罗拉 Moto G84 位置服务 - 桥接
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 转折点
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 转折点
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 桥接
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 桥接

电话功能和通话质量

摩托罗拉使用的是谷歌的标准应用程序,许多其他手机制造商的用户对此应该不会陌生。

将手机放在耳边时,通话质量很好--电话另一端的人听起来非常清晰,而且我们的声音也能很好地传递,无论我们说话的声音有多小或多大。而使用内置扬声器时,声音就显得遥远而缺乏质感。免提麦克风效果很好,我们的声音也能很好地传递。

照相机 - 灵活,具有同类产品的卓越品质

使用前置摄像头自拍
使用前置摄像头自拍

这款手机使用三星 Isocell S5KGN9 作为主摄像头传感器。它具有 5000 万像素的分辨率,但主要以 1250 万像素拍摄照片--这样,它将四个像素合二为一,从而获得了更高的亮度。

即便如此,我们的测试照片还是显得有点暗,缺乏细节,颗粒感很强。不过,考虑到这款智能手机的价格,照片还是相当不错的。

视频最高可录制 1080p 和 60 fps。对于这个价位的手机来说,这是一个进步--通常情况下,你只能使用 30 fps。自动对焦工作相当迅速可靠,但有时会出现闪烁显示,这在录像中也能看到。

我们喜欢 Moto G84 配备的 800 万像素广角镜头,它还可以用作微距摄像头。这就形成了一个相当灵活的相机系统,尤其是广角镜头和主摄像头之间有一个混合变焦,但更换镜头时显示非常清晰。就细节而言,广角摄像头拍摄的照片比较平庸,所以不要过分放大。

前置摄像头的分辨率为 1600 万像素,在明亮的光线下可以拍出相当细腻的自拍照,但动态效果可能会更好一些。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera flowerMain camera surroundingsMain camera low lightWide-angle lens
orginal image
click to load images

在测试实验室非常明亮的光线下,主摄像头拍摄的照片几乎有点曝光过度,边缘的清晰度也明显下降。在照度为 1 勒克斯的情况下,主体仍可大致辨认,但当您对其进行更细致的观察时,图像几乎无法使用。

ColorChecker
8.9 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
8 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
11 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
6 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G84: 9.59 ∆E min: 2.78 - max: 20.32 ∆E
ColorChecker
3.7 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
0.9 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G84: 8.03 ∆E min: 0.93 - max: 15.85 ∆E

交货和保修范围 - 包括物品

实际上,摩托罗拉 Moto G84 已经配备了硅胶防撞器,因此您无需单独购买。它还配有充电器和相应的 USB 数据线。

摩托罗拉为其手机提供 12 个月的保修服务。如果你想要额外的保险,包括显示屏损坏和意外损坏,那么你应该考虑购买 1-3 年的 Moto Care。不过,现在您也可以从许多其他供应商那里找到此类保险。

输入设备和操作 - 快速指纹传感器

由于采用了 120Hz 的屏幕,Moto G84 的触摸屏对输入的反应非常迅速。它的灵敏度一直保持到边角。

它的指纹扫描仪位于屏幕后面,从外面看不到。它能可靠地识别学习到的指纹,并快速打开手机。手机还支持面部识别功能,同样运行可靠。使用这两种生物识别方式时,手机解锁速度最快。

直立式键盘
直立式键盘
水平键盘
水平键盘

显示屏 - 性价比极高的显示屏

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

摩托罗拉为这款手机配备了 OLED 显示屏,分辨率达到 1080p,刷新率高达 120Hz。它真的很亮,尤其是考虑到这款智能手机的价格:我们在亮度传感器点亮的情况下,使用最高设置测得平均亮度为 889 cd/m²。小区域(APL18)的亮度更高,可达 1230 尼特。

这意味着手机在描绘 HDR 内容时不会受到任何阻碍,但摩托罗拉尚未对其进行官方认证。即便如此,应用程序 DRM Info 还是显示它支持 HDR10 和 HLG。

我们测量到了一些 PWM 闪烁,因此敏感用户在购买该设备之前一定要试试屏幕。

923
cd/m²
899
cd/m²
874
cd/m²
900
cd/m²
894
cd/m²
880
cd/m²
889
cd/m²
876
cd/m²
866
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 923 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 889 cd/m² Minimum: 1.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 894 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
146.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.252
Motorola Moto G84
P-OLED, 2400x1080, 6.5"
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Xiaomi Poco X5
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Honor X8a
IPS, 2388x1080, 6.7"
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6"
Screen
-94%
-27%
-16%
-22%
Brightness middle
894
672
-25%
674
-25%
492
-45%
922
3%
Brightness
889
656
-26%
683
-23%
481
-46%
930
5%
Brightness Distribution
94
90
-4%
98
4%
94
0%
98
4%
Black Level *
0.39
0.38
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.1
3.88
-253%
1.6
-45%
1.32
-20%
2.5
-127%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.81
7.89
-181%
5.3
-89%
3.37
-20%
3.6
-28%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3
5.2
-73%
2.5
17%
1.9
37%
2.7
10%
Gamma
2.252 98%
2.218 99%
2.21 100%
2.194 100%
2.09 105%
CCT
7122 91%
7734 84%
6346 102%
6288 103%
6661 98%
Contrast
1723
1295

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 90 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 90 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 90 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

0% 亮度
0% 亮度
25% 亮度
25% 亮度
50% 亮度
50% 亮度
75% 亮度
75% 亮度
100% 亮度
100% 亮度

具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列

在使用软件 CalMAN 进行的测试中,我们测出了轻微的蓝色色调,肉眼可以感觉到--除此之外,该显示器在 "自然 "模式下的色彩表现总体良好,这意味着它可以在专业环境中使用。

它的反应速度非常快,因此也非常适合游戏玩家使用。

卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN 色彩精度
卡尔曼色彩空间 sRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间 sRGB
CalMAN 色彩空间 AdobeRGB
CalMAN 色彩空间 AdobeRGB
CalMAN 色彩空间 DCI P3
CalMAN 色彩空间 DCI P3
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 饱和度

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
0.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.4 ms rise
↘ 0.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5 ms rise
↘ 0.5 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

在户外,这款手机的表现也不错--在阳光直射下,屏幕仍能保持一定的清晰度。

如果从侧面看屏幕,会发现亮度略有变化,但始终清晰可辨。

室外使用
室外使用
视角
视角

性能 - 速度快,但不适合人工智能

高通高通骁龙 695摩托罗拉为我们的测试设备配备的高通骁龙 695 是 2023 中端智能手机中真正的明星:您还可以在OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite小米 Poco X5等等。

在性能方面,摩托罗拉 Moto G84 在同价位产品中表现出色,但根据我们的基准测试,人工智能计算并不是它的强项。即便如此,该系统的表现总体上还是相当流畅的--有时,我们只是注意到在运行要求较高的应用程序时,会出现加载时间短和掉帧的情况。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=175, last 2 years)
1040 Points +54%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
782 Points +16%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
678 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (659 - 697, n=24)
676 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
674 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G84
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
674 Points
Honor X8a
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
284 Points -58%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=175, last 2 years)
3474 Points +89%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
2315 Points +26%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1963 Points +7%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
1925 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (1663 - 2038, n=24)
1904 Points +4%
Motorola Moto G84
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
1839 Points
Honor X8a
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1132 Points -38%
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=173, last 2 years)
1494 Points +64%
Motorola Moto G84
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
911 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (893 - 919, n=8)
906 Points -1%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
893 Points -2%
Honor X8a
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
438 Points -52%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=173, last 2 years)
4189 Points +104%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (1993 - 2189, n=8)
2073 Points +1%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2064 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G84
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
2058 Points
Honor X8a
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1217 Points -41%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 2056989, n=104, last 2 years)
810694 Points +95%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
472321 Points +14%
Motorola Moto G84
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
416086 Points
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
404106 Points -3%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
398336 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (344344 - 416086, n=18)
389461 Points -6%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years)
13174 Points +12%
Motorola Moto G84
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
11732 Points
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
11721 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
10634 Points -9%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
10055 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (6897 - 11732, n=23)
9629 Points -18%
Honor X8a
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
6789 Points -42%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 12993, n=159, last 2 years)
6470 Points +72%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3850 Points +2%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3819 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G84
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
3767 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (3171 - 3848, n=19)
3648 Points -3%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3333 Points -12%
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 17953, n=159, last 2 years)
10306 Points +25%
Motorola Moto G84
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
8231 Points
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
7745 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (6789 - 8231, n=19)
7725 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
7182 Points -13%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
6958 Points -15%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 18911, n=159, last 2 years)
7031 Points +68%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
5267 Points +26%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
4560 Points +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (3167 - 4836, n=19)
4227 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G84
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
4179 Points
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3623 Points -13%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=159, last 2 years)
17891 Points +312%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
4666 Points +7%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
4360 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G84
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
4346 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (3975 - 4426, n=19)
4340 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3975 Points -9%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=159, last 2 years)
1575 Points +17%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
1382 Points +3%
Motorola Moto G84
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
1348 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (1078 - 1434, n=19)
1253 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
1244 Points -8%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1232 Points -9%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
22490 Points +291%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=150, last 2 years)
17814 Points +209%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (5442 - 9348, n=15)
6775 Points +18%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
5785 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G84
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
5758 Points
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
5723 Points -1%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=143, last 2 years)
25319 Points +5197%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
9429 Points +1873%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3080 Points +544%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (426 - 3080, n=7)
825 Points +73%
Motorola Moto G84
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 12288
478 Points

如果您将来想在这款智能手机上呈现 4K 或 1440p 的内容,那么摩托罗拉 Moto G84 的功率实在太小了。不过,除了在非常苛刻的任务中,它还是比较顺利地完成了 1080p 基准测试。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
622 Points +77%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
354 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
352 Points
Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
156 Points -56%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
640 Points +77%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
361 Points
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
360 Points 0%
Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
188 Points -48%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2220 Points +86%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1207 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1193 Points
Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
622 Points -48%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2279 Points +89%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1216 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1203 Points
Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
697 Points -42%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3086 Points +8%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2846 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4359 Points +61%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2713 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3993 Points +46%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2741 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4047 Points +15%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3506 Points
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3392 Points -3%
Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2478 Points -29%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4406 Points +48%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2988 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2968 Points
Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1231 Points -59%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4321 Points +41%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3073 Points
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3069 Points 0%
Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1386 Points -55%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
89 fps +7%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
83 fps
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
79 fps -5%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
60 fps -28%
Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
34 fps -59%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
106 fps +14%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
96 fps +3%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
94 fps +1%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
93 fps
Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
38 fps -59%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
54 fps +29%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
43 fps +2%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
42 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
42 fps
Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
19 fps -55%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
68 fps +45%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
48 fps +2%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps
Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
21 fps -55%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
39 fps +30%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
31 fps +3%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps
Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
13 fps -57%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
43 fps +26%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
35 fps +3%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps
Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
13 fps -62%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps +35%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps 0%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps
Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
7.4 fps -56%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps +30%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps 0%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps
Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
8.7 fps -56%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps +42%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps 0%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps
Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
4.8 fps -60%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps +41%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8 fps +3%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.8 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.8 fps
Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
3.2 fps -59%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps +37%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps 0%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps
Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
7.5 fps -61%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps +38%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps +5%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps
Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
8.2 fps -61%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4.7 fps +34%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4 fps +14%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.5 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.5 fps
Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1.5 fps -57%

摩托罗拉 Moto G84 可以让您非常流畅地浏览网页--在所有基准测试中,它都名列前茅。不过,较新的浏览器版本可能也是原因之一。

在日常使用中,即使是较大的网站,加载速度也非常快,而且在滚动时,图片通常已经显示出来。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)
124.4 Points +21%
Motorola Moto G84 (Chrome 118)
102.69 Points
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G (Chrome 114)
78.264 Points -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (48.6 - 105.3, n=19)
71.2 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G (Chrome 111.0.5563.116)
69.688 Points -32%
Xiaomi Poco X5 (Chrome 113)
68.36 Points -33%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)
143.9 runs/min +98%
Motorola Moto G84 (Chrome 118)
72.6 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G (Chrome 111.0.5563.116)
62.2 runs/min -14%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G (Chome 114)
58.2 runs/min -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (38.7 - 80.1, n=16)
54 runs/min -26%
Xiaomi Poco X5 (chrome 113)
44.3 runs/min -39%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years)
117.1 Points +9%
Motorola Moto G84 (Chrome 118)
107 Points
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G (Chrome 114)
80 Points -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (58 - 111, n=18)
74.3 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G (Chrome 111.0.5563.116)
74 Points -31%
Xiaomi Poco X5 (Chrome 113)
73 Points -32%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Motorola Moto G84 (Chrome 118)
156 Points
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
150.2 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G (Chrome 111.0.5563.116)
114 Points -27%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G (Chrome 114)
106 Points -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (75 - 156, n=12)
101 Points -35%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=211, last 2 years)
38432 Points +25%
Motorola Moto G84 (Chrome 118)
30733 Points
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G (Chrome 111.0.5563.116)
25154 Points -18%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G (Chrome 114)
24196 Points -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (17849 - 31647, n=21)
24051 Points -22%
Xiaomi Poco X5 (Chrome 113)
22881 Points -26%
Honor X8a (Chrome 114)
9404 Points -69%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi Poco X5 (Chrome 113)
1860 ms * -42%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G (Chrome 111.0.5563.116)
1796.7 ms * -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (1298 - 2501, n=18)
1769 ms * -35%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G (Chrome 114)
1615.5 ms * -23%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)
1523 ms * -16%
Motorola Moto G84 (Chrome 118)
1309.3 ms *

* ... smaller is better

摩托罗拉为这款中端手机安装了 UFS 2.2 闪存,在速度方面达到了同类产品的平均水平:数据传输完成得相当快,加载时间也可以承受。

Motorola Moto G84OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5GXiaomi Poco X5Honor X8aSamsung Galaxy A34 5GAverage 256 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-12%
-2%
-65%
25%
41%
146%
Sequential Read 256KB
506.9
506.1
0%
522.64
3%
278.1
-45%
887.41
75%
Sequential Write 256KB
511.5
466.6
-9%
497.38
-3%
224.2
-56%
494.67
-3%
Random Read 4KB
195.8
162.5
-17%
185.09
-5%
61.6
-69%
216.75
11%
Random Write 4KB
174.7
134.9
-23%
168.49
-4%
18.7
-89%
206.14
18%

游戏 - 40 fps 是可能的

现在,我们想看看摩托罗拉 Moto G84 适合游戏玩家的程度。为此,我们安装了《PUBG Mobile》、《暗黑破坏神:不朽》和GameBench 软件。该软件允许我们记录帧速率。

测试结果您可能不希望获得超过 30 fps 的帧率--在运行《PUBG》时,我们获得了 40 fps 的帧率,但细节非常低。许多游戏,如《暗黑破坏神》,甚至不允许你选择更高的帧率。

这款手机绝不是一款完全的游戏机,但只要你控制好自己的期望值,还是可以流畅地玩一些要求较高的游戏。

通过触摸屏和位置传感器(视游戏而定)控制游戏的工作非常可靠。

暗黑破坏神:不朽
暗黑破坏神:不朽
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
0510152025303540Tooltip
Motorola Moto G84; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 2.8.0: Ø39.8 (37-41)
Motorola Moto G84; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.8.0: Ø29.9 (28-31)
Motorola Moto G84; Diablo Immortal; Medium Mobile Low; 2.1.0: Ø29.9 (28-31)
Motorola Moto G84; Diablo Immortal; Ultra Mobile Very High; 2.1.0: Ø29.7 (25-31)

排放 - Moto G84 几乎没有任何节流现象

温度

在我们的压力测试中,摩托罗拉的温度最高达到 45.1 °C。因此,我们可以说它从未达到任何临界值,但需要注意的是,我们是在室温下进行这些测量的。在夏季,长时间的负载很可能会导致温度升高。

无论如何,SoC 似乎没有受到任何影响,甚至在运行 20 次相同的基准测试(3DMark 压力测试)时也取得了非常相似的结果。

Max. Load
 44 °C38.1 °C36.3 °C 
 43 °C39.4 °C36 °C 
 42.3 °C39.3 °C35.8 °C 
Maximum: 44 °C
Average: 39.4 °C
36 °C39.5 °C42.6 °C
35.7 °C39.6 °C44.4 °C
35.9 °C40.3 °C45.1 °C
Maximum: 45.1 °C
Average: 39.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  40.2 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.1 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.1 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.7 % 0%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 %
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % 0%
Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
83 % -17%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % +1%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.2 % 0%
Motorola Moto G84
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99 %
Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
81.8 % -17%
012345678910111213Tooltip
Motorola Moto G84 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.15 (2.14-2.16)
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø2.17 (2.16-2.18)
Honor X8a Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø1.011 (0.932-1.14)
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø3.83 (3.82-3.84)
Motorola Moto G84 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.2 (7.19-7.22)
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.26 (7.24-7.27)
Honor X8a Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.9 (3.73-4.49)
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.6 (13.6-13.6)
热图前端
热图前端
热图返回
热图返回

发言人

手机壳底部边缘的扬声器由听筒提供支持,因此水平握持手机时会产生轻微的立体声效果。由于采用了杜比全景声(Dolby Atmos)技术,还支持虚拟环绕声。

当以最大音量播放专业混音的流行音乐时,扬声器有时会听起来高音很重:有一次,我们几乎感觉到了身体上的疼痛,因为声音在耳边轰鸣得让人难受。

当我们把音量调低一点时,扬声器的声音并没有改善多少,但至少不再让人感觉不舒服了。在中等音量下,您可以很好地聆听语音和音乐。

用于外接扬声器和耳机的 3.5 毫米插孔以及通过蓝牙连接无线设备的可能性都是我们乐于见到的功能。我们很高兴摩托罗拉支持目前几乎所有的无线音频编解码器,因此使用外接设备收听高保真音乐不成问题。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.840.9253735.63131.730.54032.529.75036.432.16328.929.18024.423.310023.724.912524.128.916020.134.120013.637.925012.64531512.750.540011.257.150013.565.163014.769.68001470.6100013.672.4125012.670.416001168.6200010.872.1250011.570.3315013.867.140001567.6500015.671.2630016.273.2800017.268.41000017.8671250017.164.61600017.854.7SPL26.782N0.852.7median 14median 67.1Delta2.410.329.638.33031.824.532.925.831.937.538.725.232.320.235.420.435.717.54214.453.314.352.515.255.411.957.913.560.612.162.112.460.611.766.111.873.811.476.712.378.212.279.212.179.512.281.312.981.713.481.713.27812.974.713.674.313.47213.260.824.890.40.678.5median 12.9median 73.80.910.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Moto G84Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Moto G84 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A34 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 充电功率高达 30 瓦

耗电量

Moto G84 在低负载时并不完全省电,但至少其最大耗电量控制在一定范围内。其他同价位设备的总耗电量要高于我们的测试手机。

摩托罗拉手机的最大充电功率为 30 瓦。这意味着有时需要 2 个小时才能再次显示 100% 电量,至少在之前电池电量很低的情况下是这样。我们的测试设备不支持无线充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1 / 1.3 / 1.4 Watt
Load midlight 3.5 / 5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Motorola Moto G84
5000 mAh
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco X5
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
5000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-16%
-1%
-11%
-16%
-41%
Idle Minimum *
1
1.1
-10%
0.96
4%
0.69
31%
0.886 ?(0.56 - 1.2, n=18)
11%
Idle Average *
1.3
1.5
-15%
1.49
-15%
1.61
-24%
1.76 ?(0.91 - 4.76, n=18)
-35%
Idle Maximum *
1.4
1.7
-21%
1.53
-9%
1.66
-19%
1.92 ?(0.98 - 4.79, n=18)
-37%
Load Average *
3.5
4.1
-17%
3.52
-1%
4.01
-15%
3.86 ?(2.4 - 9.52, n=18)
-10%
Load Maximum *
5
5.8
-16%
4.32
14%
6.5
-30%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345Tooltip
Motorola Moto G84; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3 (0.895-5.06)
Motorola Moto G84; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.198 (1.075-1.445)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.40.50.70.91.11.31.51.61.822.22.42.62.72.93.13.33.5Tooltip
Motorola Moto G84; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.34 (3.1-3.65)
Motorola Moto G84; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.198 (1.075-1.445)

运行时间

Moto G84 的电池容量为 5,000 mAh,与竞争对手的电池容量差不多。事实证明,我们的测试设备具有很强的续航能力,在 WLAN 测试中的续航时间为 15:08 小时。在日常使用中,您应该可以使用两天而无需充电。

如果你喜欢在手机上玩游戏,那么如果你玩的是一款要求较高的游戏,那么你可以期待长达 4:37 小时的游戏时间。之后,您需要再次将手机连接到充电器。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
33h 17min
WiFi Websurfing
15h 08min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 42min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 37min
Motorola Moto G84
5000 mAh
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco X5
5000 mAh
Honor X8a
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
3%
-14%
2%
35%
Reader / Idle
1997
2165
8%
1482
-26%
2975
49%
H.264
1002
1029
3%
896
-11%
1363
36%
WiFi v1.3
908
986
9%
662
-27%
927
2%
1024
13%
Load
277
254
-8%
304
10%
395
43%

Pros

+ 纤薄轻巧的外壳
+ 大量存储空间
+ 精确定位服务
+ 60 fps 的视频录制速度
+ 明亮的 120-Hz OLED 屏幕
+ 在负载情况下仅有极小的节流
+ 多种无线音频编解码器
+ 良好的运行时间

Cons

- 扬声器声音不舒适
- 不支持 eSIM
- PWM 闪烁

结论 - Moto G84 功能丰富,价格低廉

摩托罗拉 Moto G84 评测。测试设备由摩托罗拉德国公司提供。
摩托罗拉 Moto G84 评测。测试设备由摩托罗拉德国公司提供。

摩托罗拉 Moto G84 的性价比很高:只需支付 320 美元,就能获得大量存储空间、相对灵活的照相系统、色彩准确度高的明亮显示屏、良好的运行时间,以及带有 3 年安全补丁的Android 。

这款手机机身纤薄,相当轻巧,而且外观漂亮。此外,它还支持 Ready For 功能,这是一个桌面界面,可以在无线连接外部设备时使用。这使得手机的用途更加广泛,你甚至可以用它来替代电脑。

对于音响发烧友来说,摩托罗拉 Moto G84 有点像一把双刃剑:它的扬声器肯定不会让发烧友非常满意,但另一方面,它支持几乎所有当前的无线音频编解码器,如果需要,甚至包括使用杜比 Atmos 的虚拟环绕声。

很多东西都令人印象深刻,各种功能都达到了同类产品的标准,几乎没有什么可挑剔的:320 美元就能买到摩托罗拉 Moto G84,这是一款拥有大量存储空间的全面机型。

在这个价格范围内,三星Galaxy A34采用了同样明亮的 OLED 显示屏,其无线局域网速度甚至更快一些。如果您对 PWM 有意见,那么不妨仔细看看OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite.它采用快速的 IPS 屏幕。

价格和供应情况

摩托罗拉 Moto G84 目前可在亚马逊等在线零售商处购买。它的最高售价约为 320 美元。

Motorola Moto G84 - 10/31/2023 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
85%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
90%
Connectivity
52 / 70 → 74%
Weight
91%
Battery
90%
Display
92%
Games Performance
32 / 64 → 50%
Application Performance
76 / 86 → 88%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
60 / 90 → 67%
Camera
63%
Average
76%
82%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 摩托罗拉 Moto G84 5G 智能手机评测--明亮的 OLED 屏幕和大量存储空间,售价不到 350 美元
Florian Schmitt, 2023-11- 2 (Update: 2024-08-15)