英特尔NUC 12 Pro套件（酷睿i5-1240P）迷你电脑评测。迅捷，有很好的连接性
英特尔的NUC阵容继续成为迷你PC市场的领导者，而最新的华尔街峡谷NUC也不例外。凭借强大而高效的第12代Alder Lake CPU和英特尔的 Iris Xe图形华尔街峡谷NUCs应该能在短时间内完成大多数家庭和办公室的计算工作。我们 最近审查了NUC 12配备了 英特尔酷睿i7-1260P并发现这款小型台式机有很多值得喜欢的地方。今天，我们将看看它的小兄弟，NUC 12与一个 英特尔酷睿i5-1240P.具体来说，我们将看看NUC 12专业套件，其中包括16GB内存和512GB NVMe SSD。
由于我们的NUC 12评测单元是建立在一个类似于我们之前评测的NUC 12的情况下，我们将只关注性能上的差异。构建方面的关键差异是，我们今天的审查单元比Core i7-1260P Wall Street Canyon NUC略高（45.6毫米对37毫米），以便在机箱底部容纳一个2.5英寸SATA驱动器。除此之外，端口选择、建造质量和所有其他物理因素在设备之间是相同的。关于这些项目的细节，请参考我们对 英特尔酷睿i7-1260P华尔街峡谷NUC.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
v (old) | 03 / 2023 | Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSBi5 i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 549 g | 45.6 mm | x | ||
v (old) | 11 / 2022 | Geekom Mini IT11-GM11i7T i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 565 g | 45.6 mm | x | ||
v (old) | 09 / 2022 | Beelink U59 N5105 Celeron N5105, UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) | 320 g | 42 mm | x | ||
v (old) | 08 / 2022 | Newsmay Neosmay S2-B560TPM i5-11400T, UHD Graphics 730 | 1.3 kg | 40 mm | x | ||
v (old) | 07 / 2022 | Lenovo IdeaCentre AIO 3 24IAP7 i7-1260P, GeForce MX550 | 6.8 kg | 434 mm | 23.80" | 1920x1080 | |
v (old) | 06 / 2022 | Minisforum EliteMini B550 R7 5700G, Vega 8 | 1.1 kg | 67 mm | x | ||
v (old) | 05 / 2022 | Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T i5-8259U, Iris Plus Graphics 655 | 586 g | 45.5 mm | x | ||
| 78.9 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2022 | Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSKi7 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 511 g | 37 mm | x |
业绩
我们的NUC 12 Pro套件配备了英特尔的中端 Core i5-1240P Alder Lake CPU.再加上随附的16GB DDR4内存和512GB NVMe SSD，这台迷你PC相当敏捷，装备齐全，适合家庭和办公室使用。得益于附带的 英特尔Iris Xe显卡（80欧盟）。它甚至可以处理一些轻度到中度的照片和视频编辑，以及一些游戏，尽管分辨率较低。
处理器
英特尔酷睿i5-1240P是一款可靠的中端CPU。这款12核芯片（4个性能，8个效率）建立在10纳米FinFET工艺上。因此，它在性能和电源效率之间提供了一个很好的平衡（尽管AMD有7纳米的芯片，提供类似或更好的性能，但耗电量更少）。1240P的性能核心是超线程的，最多可实现16个线程。
在实际性能方面，Core i5-1240P仅次于英特尔的Core i7-1260P。在大多数基准测试中，桤木湖i5大约比它的大哥哥落后5-10%。1240P在与AMD的 Ryzen 7 5700G但英特尔的产品在扩展工作负载方面比AMD的芯片稍有逊色。
在我们的Cinebench R15循环测试中，Core i5-1240P落后于Core i7-1260P，甚至模仿了i7在第一次运行后的性能下降。扩展性能保持稳定，尽管它是其首次运行性能的85%。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Average of class Desktop (451 - 902, n=16, last 2 years) | |
| Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSKi7 | |
| Lenovo IdeaCentre AIO 3 24IAP7 | |
| Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSBi5 | |
| Geekom Mini IT11-GM11i7T | |
| Minisforum EliteMini B550 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P (251 - 653, n=16) | |
| Newsmay Neosmay S2-B560TPM | |
| Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T | |
| Beelink U59 N5105 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average of class Desktop (4085 - 16722, n=16, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaCentre AIO 3 24IAP7 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini B550 | |
| Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSKi7 | |
| Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSBi5 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P (763 - 4456, n=16) | |
| Geekom Mini IT11-GM11i7T | |
| Newsmay Neosmay S2-B560TPM | |
| Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T | |
| Beelink U59 N5105 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Desktop (233 - 356, n=21, last 2 years) | |
| Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSKi7 | |
| Lenovo IdeaCentre AIO 3 24IAP7 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini B550 | |
| Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSBi5 | |
| Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSBi5 | |
| Geekom Mini IT11-GM11i7T | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P (91.8 - 243, n=18) | |
| Newsmay Neosmay S2-B560TPM | |
| Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T | |
| Beelink U59 N5105 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Desktop (2005 - 6588, n=21, last 2 years) | |
| Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSBi5 | |
| Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSBi5 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini B550 | |
| Lenovo IdeaCentre AIO 3 24IAP7 | |
| Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSKi7 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P (407 - 2007, n=19) | |
| Geekom Mini IT11-GM11i7T | |
| Newsmay Neosmay S2-B560TPM | |
| Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T | |
| Beelink U59 N5105 | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Beelink U59 N5105 | |
| Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T | |
| Newsmay Neosmay S2-B560TPM | |
| Geekom Mini IT11-GM11i7T | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P (285 - 1926, n=16) | |
| Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSBi5 | |
| Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSKi7 | |
| Lenovo IdeaCentre AIO 3 24IAP7 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini B550 | |
| Average of class Desktop (77 - 333, n=18, last 2 years) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Average of class Desktop (5262 - 8211, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| Geekom Mini IT11-GM11i7T | |
| Minisforum EliteMini B550 | |
| Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSKi7 | |
| Lenovo IdeaCentre AIO 3 24IAP7 | |
| Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSBi5 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P (2197 - 5320, n=16) | |
| Newsmay Neosmay S2-B560TPM | |
| Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T | |
| Beelink U59 N5105 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Average of class Desktop (45947 - 160423, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| Minisforum EliteMini B550 | |
| Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSKi7 | |
| Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSBi5 | |
| Lenovo IdeaCentre AIO 3 24IAP7 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P (7254 - 47002, n=16) | |
| Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T | |
| Geekom Mini IT11-GM11i7T | |
| Newsmay Neosmay S2-B560TPM | |
| Beelink U59 N5105 | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Average of class Desktop (12.9 - 45.7, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| Minisforum EliteMini B550 | |
| Lenovo IdeaCentre AIO 3 24IAP7 | |
| Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSKi7 | |
| Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSBi5 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P (1.99 - 12.9, n=16) | |
| Geekom Mini IT11-GM11i7T | |
| Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T | |
| Newsmay Neosmay S2-B560TPM | |
| Beelink U59 N5105 | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Beelink U59 N5105 | |
| Geekom Mini IT11-GM11i7T | |
| Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T | |
| Newsmay Neosmay S2-B560TPM | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P (46.4 - 120.5, n=16) | |
| Minisforum EliteMini B550 | |
| Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSBi5 | |
| Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSKi7 | |
| Lenovo IdeaCentre AIO 3 24IAP7 | |
| Average of class Desktop (33.6 - 49.1, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Beelink U59 N5105 | |
| Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T | |
| Newsmay Neosmay S2-B560TPM | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P (0.4987 - 1.236, n=16) | |
| Geekom Mini IT11-GM11i7T | |
| Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSBi5 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini B550 | |
| Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSKi7 | |
| Lenovo IdeaCentre AIO 3 24IAP7 | |
| Average of class Desktop (0.3307 - 0.4987, n=15, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
系统性能
系统的整体性能是敏捷和响应的。基于1240P的NUC 12在大多数PCMark 10基准测试中与竞争对手保持一致。然而，它在数字内容创作方面落后于AMD驱动的机器，可能是由于AMD更强大的Vega iGPU。尽管如此，NUC 12在处理家庭和办公室工作，以及一些轻度视频和照片编辑方面应该没有问题。
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Average of class Desktop (5331 - 10699, n=12, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaCentre AIO 3 24IAP7 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini B550 | |
| Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSKi7 | |
| Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSBi5 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (4881 - 5345, n=11) | |
| Geekom Mini IT11-GM11i7T | |
| Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T | |
| Newsmay Neosmay S2-B560TPM | |
| Beelink U59 N5105 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Average of class Desktop (10652 - 12591, n=12, last 2 years) | |
| Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSKi7 | |
| Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSBi5 | |
| Geekom Mini IT11-GM11i7T | |
| Minisforum EliteMini B550 | |
| Lenovo IdeaCentre AIO 3 24IAP7 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (8890 - 10652, n=11) | |
| Newsmay Neosmay S2-B560TPM | |
| Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T | |
| Beelink U59 N5105 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Average of class Desktop (7058 - 12944, n=12, last 2 years) | |
| Minisforum EliteMini B550 | |
| Lenovo IdeaCentre AIO 3 24IAP7 | |
| Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSKi7 | |
| Geekom Mini IT11-GM11i7T | |
| Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSBi5 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (6118 - 7058, n=11) | |
| Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T | |
| Newsmay Neosmay S2-B560TPM | |
| Beelink U59 N5105 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Average of class Desktop (5469 - 22005, n=12, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaCentre AIO 3 24IAP7 | |
| Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSKi7 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini B550 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (5169 - 6213, n=11) | |
| Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSBi5 | |
| Geekom Mini IT11-GM11i7T | |
| Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T | |
| Newsmay Neosmay S2-B560TPM | |
| Beelink U59 N5105 | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5331 points | |
Help | ||
DPC延时
根据LatencyMon，NUC 12对实时音频处理是足够的。视频流也很流畅；NUC在流传4K YouTube视频时只掉了1-2帧。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini B550 | |
| Beelink U59 N5105 | |
| Newsmay Neosmay S2-B560TPM | |
| Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSBi5 | |
| Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSKi7 | |
| Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T | |
| Geekom Mini IT11-GM11i7T | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
附带的Lexar NVMe SSD速度快如闪电，超过了大多数竞争对手。NUC 12通过一个M.2 2280插槽支持PCIe x4 Gen 4固态硬盘。然而，这种性能不应该被夸大，因为NUC 12通常作为裸机套件出售，用户将需要安装自己的驱动器。也就是说，这个特定配置中的驱动器的速度令人印象深刻。
有第二个M.2驱动器插槽，但它只接受42毫米的驱动器，并以SATA 3速度运行。在该装置的底部还有一个2.5英寸的驱动器插槽，用于SATA驱动器。
| Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSBi5 Lexar 512GB NM6A1 LNM6A1X512G-HNNG | Geekom Mini IT11-GM11i7T Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Beelink U59 N5105 Silicon Motion AZW 512G NV428 | Newsmay Neosmay S2-B560TPM Lexar NM610 500GB | Minisforum EliteMini B550 Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1 | Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1 | Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSKi7 Transcend M.2 SSD 2200S TS512GMTE220S | Average Lexar 512GB NM6A1 LNM6A1X512G-HNNG | Average of class Desktop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -8% | -70% | -8% | 5% | -40% | -13% | 0% | 126% | |
| Write 4K | 177.8 | 216.5 22% | 86.45 -51% | 124.7 -30% | 161.5 -9% | 114.2 -36% | 193.2 9% | 177.8 ? 0% | 315 ? 77% |
| Read 4K | 67.6 | 65.73 -3% | 25.9 -62% | 45.41 -33% | 51.29 -24% | 46.92 -31% | 63.23 -6% | 67.6 ? 0% | 236 ? 249% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 426.2 | 573.6 35% | 165.1 -61% | 383 -10% | 437 3% | 220.3 -48% | 405.9 -5% | 426 ? 0% | 563 ? 32% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 500.9 | 338.9 -32% | 146.6 -71% | 451.4 -10% | 602.1 20% | 316.2 -37% | 560.6 12% | 501 ? 0% | 768 ? 53% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 2705.3 | 958.2 -65% | 359.5 -87% | 2382.1 -12% | 1210 -55% | 1227.2 -55% | 1145.6 -58% | 2705 ? 0% | 5433 ? 101% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3566.7 | 1653.5 -54% | 528.3 -85% | 995.1 -72% | 2554.3 -28% | 2510.5 -30% | 2608.6 -27% | 3567 ? 0% | 6446 ? 81% |
| Write 4K Q8T8 | 428.5 | 832.5 94% | 1084.4 153% | 1045.2 144% | 408.6 -5% | 429 ? 0% | 1661 ? 288% | ||
| Read 4K Q8T8 | 937.5 | 340.2 -64% | 481.7 -49% | 857.4 -9% | 741.3 -21% | 938 ? 0% | 2090 ? 123% | ||
| AS SSD | -40% | -74% | -2% | -22% | -42% | -38% | 0% | 102% | |
| Seq Read | 2902.75 | 1356.17 -53% | 503.32 -83% | 2203.6 -24% | 2303.9 -21% | 1907.57 -34% | 2723 -6% | 2903 ? 0% | 5356 ? 85% |
| Seq Write | 1486.78 | 854.29 -43% | 443.45 -70% | 2189.3 47% | 1145 -23% | 1039.43 -30% | 1405 -6% | 1487 ? 0% | 3784 ? 155% |
| 4K Read | 59.71 | 61.08 2% | 18.93 -68% | 56.28 -6% | 57.87 -3% | 43.19 -28% | 34.41 -42% | 59.7 ? 0% | 79.1 ? 32% |
| 4K Write | 216.44 | 191.79 -11% | 72.63 -66% | 119.31 -45% | 152.35 -30% | 57.24 -74% | 100.35 -54% | 216 ? 0% | 242 ? 12% |
| 4K-64 Read | 883.18 | 325.14 -63% | 146.3 -83% | 791.75 -10% | 711.88 -19% | 772.77 -13% | 348.68 -61% | 883 ? 0% | 2050 ? 132% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1418.48 | 532.6 -62% | 181.26 -87% | 1378.5 -3% | 984.11 -31% | 385.27 -73% | 164.61 -88% | 1418 ? 0% | 3458 ? 144% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.045 | 0.091 -102% | 0.085 -89% | 0.035 22% | 0.105 -133% | 0.131 -191% | 0.084 -87% | 0.045 ? -0% | 0.0556 ? -24% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.129 | 0.045 65% | 0.188 -46% | 0.1 22% | 0.029 78% | 0.03 77% | 0.035 73% | 0.129 ? -0% | 0.046 ? 64% |
| Score Read | 1233 | 522 -58% | 216 -82% | 1068 -13% | 1000 -19% | 1007 -18% | 655 -47% | 1233 ? 0% | 2665 ? 116% |
| Score Write | 1784 | 810 -55% | 298 -83% | 1717 -4% | 1251 -30% | 546 -69% | 406 -77% | 1784 ? 0% | 4079 ? 129% |
| Score Total | 3592 | 1598 -56% | 628 -83% | 3347 -7% | 2722 -24% | 2035 -43% | 1340 -63% | 3592 ? 0% | 8037 ? 124% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1499.91 | 652.4 -57% | 1744.99 16% | 1635.71 9% | 1018.16 -32% | 612.15 -59% | 1500 ? 0% | 3050 ? 103% | |
| Copy Program MB/s | 360.32 | 77.24 -79% | 314.25 -13% | 361.36 0% | 378.31 5% | 334.59 -7% | 360 ? 0% | 1109 ? 208% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 1008.89 | 445.98 -56% | 895.29 -11% | 414.46 -59% | 322.02 -68% | 882.35 -13% | 1009 ? 0% | 2462 ? 144% | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -24% /
-26% | -72% /
-72% | -5% /
-4% | -9% /
-12% | -41% /
-41% | -26% /
-29% | 0% /
0% | 114% /
110% |
* ... smaller is better
GPU性能
图形性能是NUC 12的致命弱点，因为它只有集成图形。80欧盟版本的 英特尔的Iris Xe图形iGPU对于流式UHD媒体、一些轻度视频和照片工作以及一些较轻的游戏来说是足够的，但它在要求很高的3D任务方面却很吃力。也就是说，这个iGPU比第11代Tiger Lake 芯片之前使用的老式英特尔Iris Plus Graphics提供了大幅提升；NUC 12的3DMark性能是Geekom Mini IT8的两倍，后者使用老式的 Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655.
该设备背面的两个Thunderbolt 4端口为外部GPU提供了可能性。正如塞巴斯蒂安-贝德（Sebastian Bade）在 他对英特尔酷睿i7-1260P变体的评论指出，即使是中档的GPU也能带来图形性能的惊人改善。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 6191 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 85587 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 21793 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3941 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 1882 points | |
Help | ||
游戏性能
由于其缺乏图形性能，NUC 12上的游戏选择是有限的。这台迷你电脑只能在1280x720和低设置下玩大多数最新的游戏。较老的游戏或像DOTA这样的轻量级游戏可以在1920x1080/中档下进行，但这仍然使iGPU捉襟见肘，只能达到约30 FPS。配备AMD Vega iGPU的迷你电脑在游戏中表现明显更好，可能是因为有更好的驱动支持。
长期的性能是相当不稳定的。当试图在Witcher 3 ，运行我们长达一小时的性能测试时，游戏会在测试的5-10分钟内经常崩溃。因此，长期的游戏性能可能是不稳定的，这取决于游戏的情况。
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing | |
| Lenovo IdeaCentre AIO 3 24IAP7 | |
| Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSKi7 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini B550 | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (30.2 - 97.4, n=101) | |
| Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSBi5 | |
| Beelink U59 N5105 | |
| 1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing | |
| Lenovo IdeaCentre AIO 3 24IAP7 | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (21.8 - 56.9, n=103) | |
| Minisforum EliteMini B550 | |
| Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSBi5 | |
| Beelink U59 N5105 | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Lenovo IdeaCentre AIO 3 24IAP7 | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (9.3 - 33.5, n=101) | |
| Minisforum EliteMini B550 | |
| Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSKi7 | |
| Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSBi5 | |
| Beelink U59 N5105 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Lenovo IdeaCentre AIO 3 24IAP7 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini B550 | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (6.26 - 28, n=91) | |
| Beelink U59 N5105 | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 42 | 31 | 15 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 35.9 | 35.7 | 34.6 | 34 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 38.3 | 19.6 | ||
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 45 | 16 | 15 | |
| F1 2021 (2021) | 73 | 34 | 28 | |
| Farming Simulator 22 (2021) | 50 | 32 | 23 | 22 |
压力测试和功率消耗
英特尔酷睿i5-1240P在压力下会产生相当多的热量。在我们长达一小时的Prime95压力测试中，芯片的平均温度为83ºC，同时徘徊在2.5GHz左右。这比Core i7-1260P在同一测试中的表现还要热一些。1240P似乎没有受到热节流的影响；它在测试开始时跳到了PL2的TDP极限，然后在PL1的40瓦的极限上趋于平稳。将FurMark添加到混合测试中的结果是时钟频率略低（1.8 GHz），但温度也较低（79º C）。
候选人
+ 性能良好
+ 套装中包含闪电般的SSD
+ 紧凑的尺寸
+ 优秀的端口选择，包括2个Thunderbolt 4
弊端
-CPU在压力下会发热
- 图形/游戏性能差
- 与竞争对手相比价格昂贵
判决书
酷睿i5-1240P NUC 12 Pro套件是一款坚实的迷你PC，适合家庭和企业使用。它紧凑的外壳掩盖了其出色的性能。它可以处理大多数类型的家庭或办公室工作而不出汗，尽管游戏性能会让用户失望。这个弱点可以通过外部GPU来缓解，可以通过机器的两个Thunderbolt 4端口中的一个连接。然而，这是一个昂贵的解决方案。
说到费用，这就是英特尔NUC台式机的一个主要症结。对于他们所提供的东西来说，他们是相当昂贵的。这个特殊的装置可以作为一个裸机购买，价格大约为500-550美元，但它没有内存、存储驱动器或Windows许可证。这些都是额外的费用，可以轻易地将NUC的总价格推到800美元。以这个价格，消费者可以买到一台经济型游戏笔记本电脑，它具有类似的CPU性能，游戏性能显著提高，并配有内置键盘和屏幕。
如果Thunderbolt 4是必须的，而且你身边有一些内存和NVMe驱动器，NUC 12可能正是你要找的。
如果你正在寻找一台迷你PC，不乏竞争对手的设备。 极客网, 贝林克, 和 和Minisforum然而，这些竞争对手缺乏NUC 12的双Thunderbolt 4设置，这使得英特尔的迷你电脑具有相当大的用途。
价格和可用性
我们在这篇评论中看到的NUC 12 Pro套件可以通过亚马逊上的Geekom的Geekplus商店购买。按照配置，NUC 12 Pro套件的售价为849.99美元。你可以使用优惠券代码329K4CID，从现在起到3月22日，在目前提供的任何其他折扣的基础上节省33美元。
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
