英特尔NUC 13 Extreme Raptor Canyon迷你电脑与Core i9-13900K和GeForce RTX 3080 Ti在审查中
继野兽峡谷和龙峡谷之后,英特尔最新的猛禽峡谷NUC极端套件大大偏离了其前辈的设计。然而,英特尔的目标仍然是打造一款非常紧凑的个人电脑,几乎没有任何需要改进的地方。此外,还可以安装一个全尺寸的显卡。在CPU方面,可以选择英特尔当前猛禽湖系列的型号。当然,用户也可以选择自己的CPU,因为处理器没有被焊接。在这次审查中,我们的NUC 13 Extreme Raptor Canyon使用了一个 英特尔酷睿i9-13900K.此外,在 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3080 Ti提供了足够的3D性能,即使是要求苛刻的游戏玩家。
应该注意的是,英特尔NUC 13 Extreme Kit是一个裸机系统,没有固态硬盘、内存或显卡。价格取决于包含的CPU。基本型号为英特尔酷睿i5-13600K价格为1179美元,而最高端配置为1549美元。
支持最大长度为31厘米(约12英寸)的专用图形解决方案。由于包括750瓦的SFX电源,即使是目前的高端GPU型号也可以使用。从理论上讲,甚至有可能将一台 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4090 FE.问题是12VHPWR电缆,它最多只能提供300瓦。由于电源只为GPU配备了三根6+2电缆,因此,无论如何,电源预算都被限制在450瓦。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
英特尔NUC 13 Extreme Raptor Canyon
英特尔NUC 13极限计算元素的详细介绍
随着 英特尔酷睿i9-13900K我们配置的英特尔NUC 13 Extreme配备了目前最快的游戏CPU。它总共有24个核心和32个线程。众所周知,猛禽湖一代的CPU采用了具有E和P核心的混合设计。与英特尔NUC 12 Extreme上一样,其前身也包括一个标准的桌面处理器。此外,计算元素配备了所有必要的端口。PCB底部有三个NVMe SSD插槽,侧面有所有外部接口。
Wi-Fi性能
英特尔NUC 13 Extreme Raptor Canyon集成了杀手Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i Wi-Fi模块。与我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器结合使用,我们测得了良好的上传和下载速度。Wi-Fi单元是计算单元上的一个模块,因此用户可以更换。对于有线通信,有一个10Gb/s和一个2.5Gb/s接口。
注意。
我们在测试设备上无法获得稳定的Wi-Fi 6G连接。用英特尔NUC 13 Extreme Raptor Canyon以及我们的测试路由器的最新驱动程序和固件更新组件,并没有改善情况。如果在接下来的几天内情况发生变化,在我们不得不退回设备之前,我们将修改这部分的评论。
处理器基准测试
随着 英特尔酷睿i9-13900K,英特尔NUC 13 Extreme Raptor Canyon使用英特尔最快的游戏CPU。因此,良好的基准测试结果符合我们的预期。尽管冷却解决方案相对较小,但与配备强大液体冷却器的不同台式系统相比,我们测得的性能差距只有7%。
在功率限制方面,有一些小的限制,150瓦的限制解释了小的差异。大多数应用不会利用完整的250瓦的功率。当把英特尔NUC 13 Extreme Raptor Canyon与性能较差的英特尔酷睿i5-13600K结合起来时,性能水平应该与我们对比表中的结果相符。较低的PL2(181瓦)可能会弥补全负荷下的部分不足。
更多的处理器基准测试可以在 这里.
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
Intel Core i5-12600K |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X |
Cinebench R20 | |
CPU (Single Core) | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
CPU (Multi Core) | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X |
Cinebench R23 | |
Single Core | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Multi Core | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
Intel Core i5-12600K |
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K |
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 | |
Pass 1 | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Pass 2 | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X |
WinRAR - Result | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i5-12600K |
TrueCrypt | |
AES Mean 100MB | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Twofish Mean 100MB | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
Serpent Mean 100MB | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X |
Geekbench 5.5 | |
Multi-Core | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
Single-Core | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i5-12600K |
Geekbench 5.0 | |
5.0 Multi-Core | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
5.0 Single-Core | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i5-12600K |
Geekbench 4.4 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
Intel Core i5-12600K |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance Physics | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
Intel Core i5-12600K |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X |
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K |
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i5-12600K |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X |
3DMark | |
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Physics | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Physics | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
2560x1440 Time Spy CPU | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
Average of class Desktop | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Intel Core i7-11800H |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | |
Average of class Desktop (6011 - 83214, n=12, last 2 years) | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i7-11800H | |
Intel Core i5-12600K |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Average of class Desktop (27835 - 242692, n=12, last 2 years) | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i7-11800H | |
Intel Core i5-12600K |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
Average of class Desktop (2019 - 10804, n=12, last 2 years) | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i7-11800H | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX | |
Intel Core i5-12600K |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Average of class Desktop (75592 - 187912, n=12, last 2 years) | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX | |
Intel Core i7-11800H | |
Intel Core i5-12600K |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Average of class Desktop (6540 - 35251, n=12, last 2 years) | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i7-11800H | |
Intel Core i5-12600K |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Average of class Desktop (16325 - 127572, n=12, last 2 years) | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i7-11800H | |
Intel Core i5-12600K |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
Average of class Desktop (67922 - 513073, n=12, last 2 years) | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i7-11800H | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i5-12600K |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
Average of class Desktop (812 - 2632, n=12, last 2 years) | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX | |
Intel Core i7-11800H |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | |
Average of class Desktop (3442 - 44013, n=12, last 2 years) | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX | |
Intel Core i7-11800H | |
Intel Core i5-12600K |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel Core i5-12600K | |
Intel Core i5-13600K | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | |
Average of class Desktop (27809 - 54680, n=12, last 2 years) | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | |
Intel Core i7-11800H | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX |
英特尔NUC 13 Extreme套件。Cinebench R15多循环
我们的Cinebench R15多重循环显示,在第一次循环之后,性能明显下降。由于紧凑的冷却解决方案和功率限制,我们观察到的性能水平低于 英特尔酷睿i9-13900K在另一个系统中使用 英特尔酷睿i9-13900K在持续的CPU压力下。也就是说,4779分的结果仍然大大高于英特尔龙谷NUC的结果。
系统性能
当涉及到合成基准时,英特尔NUC 13 Extreme Raptor Canyon以非常快的系统性能大放异彩。在这里,英特尔酷睿i9-13900K具有更好的冷却效果,仍然有一个小的领先优势。然而,来自Minisforum的竞争者和NUC系列的直接前辈们并没有机会。从主观上讲,我们的测试系统非常快,反应灵敏,没有明显的延迟。
存储解决方案
我们的测试样本使用一个非常快的金士顿NVMe固态硬盘作为系统驱动器。该模型表现非常好,在AS SSD和DiskSpd中都达到了极快的传输速度。由于英特尔NUC 13 Extreme Raptor Canyon是一个裸机系统,用户可以选择他们想要安装的SSD驱动器。计算元素总共支持多达三个M.2固态硬盘。安装固态硬盘有点麻烦,因为首先需要将计算元件从NUC 13上完全拆下来。
更多的比较和基准可以在我们的 比较表.
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能
英特尔为我们的测试样品配备了一个 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3080 Ti.这款GPU提供了很好的性能,几乎可以媲美 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3090.虽然12GB的VRAM,它的VRAM是RTX 3090的一半,但这在大多数情况下仍然是足够的。在350瓦的情况下,安装的模型正在运行在我们认为合理的极限,我们不建议在紧凑型系统中使用更大的GPU。这只适用于电力消耗,因为该系统在物理上甚至支持 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4090.坚持使用GeForce-RTX-4000系列显卡的用户可能最好使用 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4080.它的TGP高达320瓦,比我们华硕的GeForce RTX 3080 Ti更经济,而且速度也大大加快。
更多的比较和基准测试可以在我们的 GPU页面.
3DMark 05 Standard | 82816 points | |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 71555 points | |
3DMark Vantage P Result | 118753 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 46806 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 288716 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 76027 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 37178 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 23232 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 18822 points | |
Help |
游戏性能
虽然 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3080 Ti已不再是最新的显卡之一,但该模型肯定不是一个糟糕的选择。一个组合是 英特尔酷睿i9-13900K和GeForce RTX 3080 Ti的组合仍然很有意义,因为它甚至能够在最大设置下流畅地显示最近的游戏。与速度更快的 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3090的性能差距是很小的。在一个基于AMD Ryzen 9 7950X的系统中,我们为比较目的而建立,同样的 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3080 Ti并没有实现重大的性能飞跃,因为当GPU接近满负荷时,处理器的性能变得不那么重要。
当涉及到选择显卡时,我们建议用户验证他们喜欢的型号的兼容性,因为支持的最大长度是有限的。图形解决方案不得超过31.3厘米(约12.32英寸)的最大长度。在厚度方面,该机箱最多允许有三个插槽。
GTA V | |
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
Corsair One i300 | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
Intel Beast Canyon NUC | |
Intel Dragon Canyon NUC - RTX 3060 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX90G | |
3840x2160 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:FX AF:8x | |
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
Corsair One i300 | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
Intel Beast Canyon NUC | |
Intel Dragon Canyon NUC - RTX 3060 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX90G |
The Witcher 3 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC | |
Corsair One i300 | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
Intel Dragon Canyon NUC - RTX 3060 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX90G | |
3840x2160 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Corsair One i300 | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
Intel Dragon Canyon NUC - RTX 3060 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX90G |
Far Cry 6 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures AA:T | |
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Corsair One i300 | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
Intel Dragon Canyon NUC - RTX 3060 | |
Intel Beast Canyon NUC | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX90G | |
3840x2160 Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures AA:T | |
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Corsair One i300 | |
Intel Dragon Canyon NUC - RTX 3060 | |
Intel Beast Canyon NUC | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX90G |
F1 2021 | |
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x | |
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Corsair One i300 | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
Intel Beast Canyon NUC | |
Intel Dragon Canyon NUC - RTX 3060 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX90G | |
3840x2160 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x | |
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | |
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon | |
Corsair One i300 | |
Minisforum NUCX i7 | |
Intel Beast Canyon NUC | |
Intel Dragon Canyon NUC - RTX 3060 | |
Minisforum Neptune Series HX90G |
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 187.6 | 187.4 | 187 | 161.5 | 152.8 | 182 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 702 | 564 | 374 | 179.1 | 156.8 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 278.9 | 242.4 | 234.1 | 216.6 | 211.1 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 234 | 229 | 180.6 | 141 | 84.2 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 232 | 202 | 148.8 | 127.3 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 239 | 208 | 198 | 186 | 176 | 109 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 613 | 489 | 407 | 359 | 269 | 161 |
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 200 | 174 | 167 | 150 | 144 | 109 |
Metro Exodus (2019) | 241 | 200 | 165.8 | 134 | 115 | 76.5 |
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 229 | 195.3 | 179.7 | 160 | 128.7 | 74 |
F1 2020 (2020) | 520 | 448 | 419 | 310 | 240 | 145.2 |
F1 2021 (2021) | 615 | 525 | 428 | 225 | 174.3 | 103.2 |
Far Cry 6 (2021) | 211 | 180.4 | 160.6 | 120.7 | 136 | 86 |
Forza Horizon 5 (2021) | 256 | 191 | 182 | 129 | 117 | 87 |
God of War (2022) | 229 | 200 | 166.6 | 119.6 | 105.8 | 77.5 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 355 | 291 | 211 | 168.5 | 123.1 | 70 |
F1 22 (2022) | 367 | 342 | 321 | 128.8 | 85.6 | 43 |
排放
温度和系统噪音
英特尔NUC 13 Extreme Raptor Canyon的机箱被分成两个腔室。顶部容纳计算元件,包括CPU、内存和SSD以及电源,而底部则完全保留给专用显卡。虽然这个概念在实践中效果很好,但英特尔酷睿i9-13900K的PL2 英特尔酷睿i9-13900K只能维持很短的时间。CPU在负载下不可避免地达到100℃。不过,尽管如此,CPU只在非常短的时间内达到这一温度。平均而言,CPU温度稳定在60至90℃之间,这取决于不同的情况。
当涉及到噪音排放时,我们配置的系统仍然相对安静。尽管在满负荷的情况下,系统的噪音为39dB(A),但它仍然远远没有达到令人讨厌的程度。我们在游戏时测得的类似数值略高于38 dB(A)。因此,安装的显卡是负载下的主要噪音来源。用更安静的型号创造一个非常安静的系统是可能的。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 32.1 / 32.1 / 32.1 dB(A) |
Load |
| 33.4 / 39 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30.4 dB(A) |
能源消耗
一个750瓦的SFX电源处理交流转换。由于我们在游戏时测得的最大功耗为499瓦,因此即使系统处于满负荷状态,用户也不必担心。我们在测试中还观察到544瓦的峰值,这并没有导致任何问题。显卡的功率为350瓦,在游戏时消耗了绝大部分的功率。我们建议不要使用具有更高TGP的GPU。新的21VHPWR电缆无论如何只能提供高达300瓦的功率--至少根据插头上的图例。总共有三条6+2-PCIe电缆。
Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | Minisforum Neptune Series HX90G R9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6600M | Minisforum NUCX i7 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | Average of class Desktop | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 51% | 36% | 0% | -19% | |
Idle Minimum * | 39 | 17.8 54% | 28.2 28% | 39 ? -0% | 42.9 ? -10% |
Idle Average * | 42 | 17.9 57% | 29.9 29% | 42 ? -0% | 80.1 ? -91% |
Idle Maximum * | 52 | 18.1 65% | 36.2 30% | 52 ? -0% | 53 ? -2% |
Load Average * | 228 | 82.1 64% | 83.2 64% | 228 ? -0% | 111.9 ? 51% |
Load Maximum * | 308 | 262 15% | 215.7 30% | 308 ? -0% | 445 ? -44% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 167 | ||||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 177 |
* ... smaller is better
Off / Standby | 2.5 / 25 Watt |
Idle | 39 / 42 / 52 Watt |
Load |
228 / 308 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Consumption External Monitor
Pros
Cons
结论 - 大量的改进和明显的性能提高
英特尔NUC 13 Extreme Raptor Canyon在许多方面做得很好。对于目前的猛禽湖模型,制造商不仅更新了硬件,而且还对机箱进行了大修。它现在明显比以前大了很多。因此,我们不再认为这个系统是一个迷你PC,尽管英特尔可能不同意。在14升的体积中,英特尔NUC 13 Extreme Raptor Canyon的竞争者是 Corsair-One-i300系列的竞争,后者的体积略微紧凑,为12升。
我们的系统配置在2160p下有足够的性能满足所有最近的标题。由于NUC 13 Raptor Canyon的裸机性质,该设备可以根据用户的要求和喜好进行定制。该 英特尔酷睿i9-13900K表现特别好,这是我们没有想到的。此外,该设备即使在负载下也保持相对安静。
英特尔NUC 13 Extreme Kit基于英特尔酷睿i9-13900K,提供非常快的性能。与适当的GPU相配,它可以成为一个伟大的游戏系统或高端工作站。
该系统,包括CPU,目前价格为1550美元。添加内存、固态硬盘和GPU可以迅速将价格推到惊人的高度。也就是说,竞争对手,如前面提到的Corsair One i300的价格也高达5000美元左右。
由于采用了优质材料,这款新机箱看起来很时尚,感觉很坚固。此外,它还采用了功能性设计,有利于冷却能力。不管怎么说,还是有一些缺点,比如难以触及的SSD和缺乏读卡器。去年的模型仍然包括后者,提供快速的UHS-II速度。
价格和可用性
在中国,英特尔NUC 13 Extreme Raptor Canyon将于2022年第四季度发布。随后将于2023年第一季度在全球发布。根据配置的不同,NUC 13 Extreme的价格在1179美元至1549美元之间,不含GPU、内存或SSD--这对NUC来说是正常的。计算元素也可单独提供,不含PC机箱,价格为760至1100美元。
在本次审查期间,英特尔为我们提供了英特尔NUC 13 Extreme Raptor Canyon。