Ninkear A16 Pro 笔记本电脑评测：经济实惠、功能强大、使用安静

Name: Ninkear A16 Pro
Brand: Ninkear

使用 AMD 会更好。

Ninkear A16 Pro 是一款令人惊喜的国产笔记本电脑，配备 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS、32 GB 内存和 1 TB SSD，售价约为 840 美元。凭借出色的功能，它的性能超过了其姊妹机型 N16 Pro，甚至接近小米红米笔记本 Pro 16。我们在测试过程中发现了具体有多接近。
Christian Hintze, 👁 Christian Hintze (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 10/29/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
AMD Laptop / Notebook Radeon Ultrabook Windows Zen

评价--优点很多，缺点很少

随着 A16 Pro 的发布，Ninkear 再一次证明了它可以为知名品牌的机型提供物美价廉的替代产品。虽然我们无法对其长期功能做出任何评价，但在测试过程中，A16 Pro 的金属外壳、漂亮的显示屏、良好且稳定的性能（即使在使用电池供电的情况下）以及安静的操作都给我们留下了深刻印象。就性能而言，它绝对领先于其姊妹机型 N16 Pro。

Test device courtesy of Geekmaxi

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

它的 720p 网络摄像头功能较弱，而且声音很大，点击板看起来有点廉价，这些都影响了输入设备原本良好的用户体验。但这些都是可以原谅的缺点。尽管该笔记本配备了大容量电池，但我们还是对其较弱的电池续航能力感到惊讶--尽管制造商表示续航时间至少为 10 小时。此外，在软件优化方面肯定还有改进的余地。它的 USB 端口也可以做得更现代化一些。

Pros

+ 金属外壳

+ 色彩准确、明亮的 1600p 显示屏

+ 良好、稳定的 CPU 和 GPU 性能

+ 电池模式下无性能损失

+ 即使在负载情况下也相对安静

+ 电池容量大

+ 配件丰富

Cons

- 无局域网连接

- 速度相当慢的 Wi-Fi 6

- 720p 网络摄像头

- 点击键盘声音大

- 固态硬盘缓慢

- 运行时间低于平均水平

- 保修问题可能比较棘手

价格和供应情况

在撰写本文时，Ninkear A16 尚未在美国发售，但如果您在欧洲，可以从我们的贷方Geekmaxi 购买。目前售价为 779 欧元（约合人民币 842 元）。

$12.98

Puccy 2 Pack Touch Pad Film Protector, compatible with Ninkear A16 Pro 16" laptop TPU TouchPad Trackpad Guard （ Not Tempered Glass Screen Protectors ）

$22.98
Puccy 3 Pack Screen Protector, compatible with Ninkear A16 Pro 16" laptop TPU Film Guard （ Not Tempered Glass Protectors）
$26.98
Puccy 2 Pack Anti Blue Light Screen Protector, compatible with Ninkear A16 Pro 16" laptop TPU Film Guard （ Not Tempered Glass Protectors ）

可能的替代品比较

Image	Model / Review	Geizhals	Weight	Height	Display
1. 80%	Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1000 GB SSD	Listenpreis 799 Euro Geizhals Suche	1.8 kg	24 mm	16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS
2. 79.3%	Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Intel Core i7-13620H ⎘ Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD	Listenpreis 800 Euro Geizhals Suche	1.8 kg	22 mm	16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS
3. 89.7% ^{v7 (old)}	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD	Listenpreis 957€	1.9 kg	15.9 mm	16.00" 3072x1920 226 PPI IPS
4. 79.1%	Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Core 7 150U ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD	Bestpreis 999€ computeruniverse.net 2. 999€ Cyberport Stores Österreich 3. 999€ Cyberport.at	1.9 kg	21 mm	16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS
5. 74.7%	Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U ⎘ Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ⎘ 16 GB Memory	Listenpreis 800 USD Geizhals Suche	1.8 kg	16.9 mm	16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS
6. 76.7%	Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD	Bestpreis 1249.95€ MEDIONshop 2. 1299€ Alternate 3. 1299€ Energeto	1.6 kg	17.8 mm	16.00" 3840x2400 283 PPI OLED

评价--优点很多，缺点很少
规格
外壳和连接性 - A16 Pro 存在许多未知因素
输入设备 - 键盘性能良好，触摸板按键噪音大
显示屏 - Ninkear，1600p，400 尼特，120 赫兹
性能 - 配备 AMD Hawk Point 的 A16 Pro
排放与动力 - 安静、凉爽的 Ninkear
Notebookcheck 总评分

近来，Ninkear 笔记本电脑给我们带来了惊喜。这台 A15 Plus和来自远东的 N16 Pro 在我们的测试中表现出色，所以现在是时候测试 A16 Pro 了。A16 Pro 的亮点在于其金属外壳和分辨率为 2560 x 1600 像素的 16 英寸屏幕。与采用英特尔 CPU 的 N16 Pro 不同，该机型采用 AMD Hawk Point 处理器和集成的 Radeon GPU。它的售价仅为 800 多美元。我们来看看它的多媒体显示效果到底有多好，它的办公软件包又有多全面。

规格

Ninkear A16 Pro

Processor

AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS 8 x 3.8 - 5.1 GHz, 65 W PL2 / Short Burst, 45 W PL1 / Sustained, Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)

Graphics adapter

AMD Radeon 780M

Memory

32 GB

, 2x 16 GB Crucial DDR5-4800

Display

16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, cso1623, IPS, glossy: no, 120 Hz

Mainboard

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Storage

Authorain NV900-1T, 1000 GB

, 860 GB free

Soundcard

AMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller

Connections

4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: Headset

Networking

Realtek RTL8852BE (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth Bluetooth 5.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 24 x 355 x 248

Battery

80 Wh

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: 720p webcam
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet US Layout, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

1.812 kg, Power Supply: 199 g

Price

799 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

外壳和连接性 - A16 Pro 存在许多未知因素

尽管有一些相似之处，但我们的 A16 Pro 在外观上与 N16 Pro 也有很大不同。Ninkear 在 A16 Pro 上采用了更多的金属材质，而减少了塑料材质。由于所有部件都是金属蓝，A16 Pro 看起来就像是从一个模具中铸造出来的。遗憾的是，显示屏的盖子在扭动时会出现明显的裂纹。而底座则非常稳定。

总的来说，它的设计非常漂亮，盖子上部的一个角上有黑色的 "Ninkear "字样。除此之外，这款笔记本电脑还闪耀着蓝色的优雅和简洁。显示屏可以 180 度打开，但遗憾的是铰链抓握不够紧。出风口隐藏在长长的铰链后面，电源按钮上集成了指纹传感器。

配件值得称赞：除了不同语言布局的键盘贴纸外，用户还可获得 USB 鼠标和鼠标垫。

遗憾的是，该机的网络摄像头分辨率仅为 720p，存在色彩偏差大、清晰度低的问题。它只支持不带 E 后缀的 Wi-Fi 6，因此缺少了快速的 6 GHz 网络，在 5 GHz 网络中的传输速率也相当一般。

要打开设备，只需卸下 13 颗十字螺丝。底板上似乎几乎没有任何夹具，因此可以立即取下。在内部，你可以接触到所有重要组件，如固态硬盘、内存、电池、Wi-Fi 模块和冷却系统。还有一个用于固态硬盘的 M.2 插槽。

尺寸比较

Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Ninkear A16 Pro Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Medion S10 OLED Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 DIN A4 ❌

连接性

遗憾的是，这款笔记本电脑不支持 Thunderbolt，而且制造商似乎也不想透露有关两个 USB-C 端口的更多细节，或者说全功能 USB-C 到底是什么意思？

USB-A 3.0，但 USB-C？(图片来源：Geekmaxi/Ninkear）

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1748 (1690^min - 1798^max) MBit/s +118%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1177 (955^min - 1409^max) MBit/s +47%
Average of class Office (47.8 - 1793, n=90, last 2 years)	1109 MBit/s +38%
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	893 (806^min - 969^max) MBit/s +11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX203	831 (765^min - 872^max) MBit/s +3%
Ninkear A16 Pro Realtek RTL8852BE	803 (755^min - 846^max) MBit/s
Average Realtek RTL8852BE (536 - 925, n=42)	792 MBit/s -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	671 (610^min - 705^max) MBit/s -16%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1746 (1391^min - 1862^max) MBit/s +94%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1651 (1601^min - 1666^max) MBit/s +84%
Average of class Office (104.2 - 1775, n=90, last 2 years)	1279 MBit/s +42%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	901 (877^min - 918^max) MBit/s 0%
Ninkear A16 Pro Realtek RTL8852BE	898 (855^min - 915^max) MBit/s
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	875 (860^min - 885^max) MBit/s -3%
Average Realtek RTL8852BE (455 - 984, n=43)	847 MBit/s -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX203	819 (751^min - 846^max) MBit/s -9%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1522 (1417^min - 1577^max) MBit/s
Average of class Office (385 - 1961, n=50, last 2 years)	1378 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Office (1065 - 1790, n=50, last 2 years)	1568 MBit/s
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1356 (1218^min - 1385^max) MBit/s

Ninkear A16 Pro Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø803 (755-846)

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø671 (610-705)

Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX203; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø831 (765-872)

Medion S10 OLED Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1177 (955-1409)

Ninkear A16 Pro Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø898 (855-915)

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø901 (877-918)

Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX203; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø819 (751-846)

Medion S10 OLED Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1650 (1601-1666)

ColorChecker Ninkear A16 Pro: 23.51 ∆E min: 1.18 - max: 31.8 ∆E

可持续性

笔记本电脑装在两个纸箱里，一个放在另一个里面。然而，在内部，包装和保护材料由大量塑料组成。制造商没有提供任何有关生产过程中_二氧化碳排放量的信息。

输入设备 - 键盘性能良好，触摸板按键噪音大

键盘布局超级整洁，与 N16 Pro 不同。在右侧，数字小键盘与其他相当大的按键挤在一起。遗憾的是，垂直方向键的高度减半。这款笔记本标配美式键盘布局，不过，使用其他语言的用户也不必担心，因为制造商提供了其他各种语言的标签贴纸。

在键盘上打字的感觉出奇的好--虽然键程较低，但键盘提供的反馈非常明显，点击的声音也相当小，只有空格键的声音明显大一些。两级白色背光可在黑暗中提供支持。

触摸板非常大（约 12.8 x 9 厘米），手指可以轻松滑过并执行手势操作。只有集成的鼠标按键似乎有点廉价，点击时声音很大，因此使用起来不太舒服，不过反馈很好，触发也很可靠。

显示屏 - Ninkear，1600p，400 尼特，120 赫兹

说到安装的哑光 IPS 显示屏，连 Hwinfo 也不得不通过（"未知"）--通过硬件 ID（CSO1623）搜索显示它是联想面板，但也没有得到任何确切的结果。它的分辨率为 2,560 x 1,600 像素，完全覆盖 sRGB，对比度高，运行频率为 120 Hz。

我们测得的平均亮度略低于 400 尼特，照度为 91%。在出厂设置中，它的黑阶过高，对比度因此受到影响。经过校准后，屏幕的黑度下降，对比度上升到 1,200:1 以上。


414 cd/m²	402 cd/m²	409.5 cd/m²
390.8 cd/m²	393.6 cd/m²	392.8 cd/m²
401.4 cd/m²	376.4 cd/m²	398.4 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

cso1623 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 414 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 397.7 cd/m² Minimum: 20 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 393.5 cd/m²
Contrast: 895:1 (Black: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.32 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.05
ΔE Greyscale 2.69 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
71.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.38

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 3)

	Ninkear A16 Pro cso1623, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 120 Hz	Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB BOE0A40 (NE160QDM-NY1), IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 165 Hz	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 TL160MDMP03_0, IPS, 3072x1920, 16", 165 Hz	Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 N160JCA-EEK (Chi Mei CMN163D), IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz	Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 LEN160WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz	Medion S10 OLED Samsung SDC4174, OLED, 3840x2400, 16", 60 Hz
Display		2%	24%	-37%	-39%	29%
Display P3 Coverage	68.7	70.2 2%	98.8 44%	42.3 -38%	41.5 -40%	99.9 45%
sRGB Coverage	97.6	99.5 2%	100 2%	63.6 -35%	61.2 -37%	100 2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	71.1	72.5 2%	89.9 26%	43.7 -39%	42.9 -40%	98.6 39%
Response Times		18%	-85%	-94%	-31%	89%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	16.4 ?(8.2, 8.2)	14 ?(6.5, 7.5) 15%	39.2 ?(15.8, 18.4) -139%	31.4 ?(15.2, 16.2) -91%	20.7 ?(11, 9.7) -26%	1.7 ?(0.9, 0.8) 90%
Response Time Black / White *	11.2 ?(6.2, 5)	9 ?(4.5, 4.5) 20%	14.6 ?(4.4, 10.2) -30%	22 ?(12.6, 9.4) -96%	15.1 ?(7.7, 7.4) -35%	1.4 ?(0.7, 0.7) 87%
PWM Frequency						60 ?(100)
Screen		23%	-1%	-67%	-114%	371%
Brightness middle	393.6	397 1%	520 32%	352 -11%	313.3 -20%	307 -22%
Brightness	398	396 -1%	510 28%	324 -19%	308 -23%	307 -23%
Brightness Distribution	91	89 -2%	93 2%	86 -5%	91 0%	96 5%
Black Level *	0.44	0.35 20%	0.35 20%	0.27 39%	0.37 16%	0.01 98%
Contrast	895	1134 27%	1486 66%	1304 46%	847 -5%	30700 3330%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.32	1.15 50%	2.9 -25%	4.41 -90%	8.42 -263%	2.1 9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.72	2.08 44%	6.2 -67%	15.04 -304%	19.09 -413%	4.87 -31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.05	0.81 23%	1.1 -5%	3.52 -235%	2.16 -106%	2.08 -98%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.69	1.4 48%	4.3 -60%	3.32 -23%	8.3 -209%	0.9 67%
Gamma	2.38 ^92%	2.142 ^103%	2.19 ^100%	2.44 ^90%	2.83 ^78%	2.197 ^100%
CCT	6086 ^107%		7422 ^88%	7122 ^91%	6296 ^103%	6513 ^100%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		14% / 18%	-21% / -8%	-66% / -64%	-61% / -86%	163% / 257%

* ... smaller is better

开箱后，面板的色彩偏差，尤其是黑阶过高。使用 Xrite 色度计和 Calman 软件进行手动校准是降低 DeltaE 值的绝佳方法，黑阶也会随之降低。我们的 icc 配置文件可在上面免费下载。遗憾的是，这个还算不错的面板只涵盖了 sRGB。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6.2 ms rise
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
16.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 8.2 ms rise
16.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 8.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

显示屏的哑光覆盖层和 400 尼特亮度确保了良好的户外可读性，尤其是在校准后对比度得到进一步提高的情况下。

性能 - 配备 AMD Hawk Point 的 A16 Pro

Ninkear A16 Pro 只有一种配置，即配备 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS包括集成的 Radeon 780M、32 GB 内存和 1 TB SSD。这使得这款 16 英寸笔记本电脑特别适合办公和一些多媒体任务。由于集成了 NPU，它还可以处理 AI 应用程序，不过最新的机型在这方面功能更加强大。

测试条件

A16 Pro 没有自己的预设性能配置文件或控制中心应用程序。因此，我们在进行性能基准测试时将 Windows 能源配置文件设置为 "性能"，而在电池测试时则设置为 "节能"。

处理器

......（英文 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS属于鹰点系列的高端笔记本处理器，拥有 8 个内核，可同时处理 16 个线程，主频从 3.8 GHz 到 5.1 GHz 不等。用于本地 AI 应用的集成 NPU 最高可达到 16 TOPS，整个 CPU 最高可达到 38 TOPS。

我们的 Cinebench R15 耐用性测试证实，CPU 的性能非常稳定，没有任何下降。Ryzen 处理器的性能与 Medion S10 中的英特尔 Ultra 7 155H 完全相当--小米红米笔记本 Pro 16 中的同款处理器仅在开始时略微快一些，但在连续运行时性能相当。

在所有的 CPU 测试中，Ryzen 7 的表现都略低于我们的预期，但在我们的比较中仍仅次于红米本，位居第二，甚至超过了 Medion 和其他所有竞争对手。

更让我们欣喜的是，A16 Pro 在电池模式下的性能丝毫未减，正如 Cinebench R15 的进一步测试结果所显示的那样。

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS: Ø2337 (2329.51-2341.78)

Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Intel Core i7-13620H: Ø1621 (1596.81-1681.38)

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2433 (2259.12-2745.18)

Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Core 7 150U: Ø1353 (1306.93-1549.25)

Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U: Ø1256 (1223.84-1461.77)

Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2345 (2300.97-2382.8)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	81.7 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	81.2 pt
Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	77.3 pt
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	76.3 pt
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Intel Core i7-13620H	67.4 pt
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Core 7 150U	67.4 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U	64.1 pt
Average of class Office	54.3 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	17401 Points +16%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (14895 - 18037, n=11)	16146 Points +7%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	15564 Points +4%
Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	15026 Points
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Intel Core i7-13620H	10819 Points -28%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U	9895 (8061.94^min - 9895.33^max) Points -34%
Average of class Office (1577 - 15743, n=93, last 2 years)	9321 Points -38%
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Core 7 150U	8692 Points -42%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Core 7 150U	2032 Points +17%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U	1873 Points +8%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Intel Core i7-13620H	1819 Points +5%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1801 Points +4%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1759 Points +1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (1623 - 1783, n=11)	1747 Points +1%
Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1737 Points
Average of class Office (618 - 1995, n=93, last 2 years)	1556 Points -10%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	6671 Points +13%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (5808 - 7026, n=11)	6309 Points +7%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	6164 Points +5%
Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	5883 Points
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Intel Core i7-13620H	4214 Points -28%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U	3790 Points -36%
Average of class Office (590 - 5980, n=92, last 2 years)	3613 Points -39%
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Core 7 150U	3370 Points -43%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Core 7 150U	782 Points +16%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Intel Core i7-13620H	700 Points +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U	699 Points +4%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	691 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (673 - 698, n=11)	685 Points +2%
Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	673 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	667 Points -1%
Average of class Office (229 - 766, n=92, last 2 years)	603 Points -10%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2745 (2259.12^min - 2745.18^max) Points +17%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (2342 - 2908, n=11)	2556 Points +9%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2383 Points +2%
Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2342 (2329.51^min - 2341.78^max) Points
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Intel Core i7-13620H	1681 (1596.81^min - 1681.38^max) Points -28%
Average of class Office (246 - 2642, n=95, last 2 years)	1561 Points -33%
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Core 7 150U	1549 (1306.93^min - 1549.25^max) Points -34%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U	1462 (1223.84^min - 1461.77^max) Points -38%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Core 7 150U	290 Points +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (269 - 283, n=11)	276 Points +1%
Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	272 Points
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Intel Core i7-13620H	263 Points -3%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	259 Points -5%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	256 Points -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U	250 Points -8%
Average of class Office (98 - 284, n=94, last 2 years)	230 Points -15%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Office (208 - 1956, n=94, last 2 years)	425 Seconds * -97%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U	360 Seconds * -67%
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Core 7 150U	356 Seconds * -65%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Intel Core i7-13620H	289 Seconds * -34%
Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	216 Seconds *
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	202 Seconds * +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (179 - 216, n=11)	202 Seconds * +6%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	190 Seconds * +12%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	68254 MIPS +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (62669 - 74664, n=11)	67906 MIPS +4%
Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	65460 MIPS
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	58874 MIPS -10%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Intel Core i7-13620H	45983 MIPS -30%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U	39286 MIPS -40%
Average of class Office (7532 - 65460, n=95, last 2 years)	38720 MIPS -41%
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Core 7 150U	37914 MIPS -42%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Intel Core i7-13620H	6326 MIPS +12%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (5197 - 6714, n=11)	6288 MIPS +11%
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Core 7 150U	6261 MIPS +11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U	5745 MIPS +1%
Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	5662 MIPS
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5562 MIPS -2%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5486 MIPS -3%
Average of class Office (2972 - 6687, n=94, last 2 years)	5245 MIPS -7%

Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13501 Points +3%
Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	13056 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (11073 - 14014, n=15)	12791 Points -2%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	11581 Points -11%
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Core 7 150U	10160 Points -22%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U	9319 Points -29%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Intel Core i7-13620H	9131 Points -30%
Average of class Office (662 - 14767, n=66, last 2 years)	8656 Points -34%

Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Core 7 150U	2781 Points +6%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U	2665 Points +2%
Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2618 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (2510 - 2698, n=13)	2617 Points 0%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Intel Core i7-13620H	2605 Points 0%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2464 Points -6%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2414 Points -8%
Average of class Office (457 - 2769, n=65, last 2 years)	2172 Points -17%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13276 Points +15%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (11256 - 12726, n=12)	11855 Points +3%
Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	11516 Points
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	11269 Points -2%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Intel Core i7-13620H	8357 Points -27%
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Core 7 150U	8354 Points -27%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U	8186 Points -29%
Average of class Office (1018 - 11980, n=94, last 2 years)	7537 Points -35%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Core 7 150U	1969 Points +8%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (1765 - 2004, n=12)	1924 Points +6%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U	1909 Points +5%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Intel Core i7-13620H	1827 Points +1%
Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1816 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1801 Points -1%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1796 Points -1%
Average of class Office (510 - 1995, n=95, last 2 years)	1582 Points -13%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (18.6 - 22.7, n=11)	20 fps +7%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	19.5 fps +4%
Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	18.7 fps
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	16.7 fps -11%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Intel Core i7-13620H	12.9 fps -31%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U	11.1 fps -41%
Average of class Office (1.72 - 18.7, n=92, last 2 years)	10.5 fps -44%
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Core 7 150U	9.17 fps -51%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Average of class Office (31.3 - 129.6, n=92, last 2 years)	53.6 s * -4%
Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	51.7 s *
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (44.4 - 77, n=11)	51 s * +1%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	48.2 s * +7%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	45.7 s * +12%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Intel Core i7-13620H	41.5 s * +20%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U	38.2 s * +26%
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Core 7 150U	29 s * +44%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average of class Office (0.4244 - 1.135, n=91, last 2 years)	0.549 sec * -12%
Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	0.4908 sec *
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.4692 sec * +4%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.4675 sec * +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (0.4304 - 0.4935, n=11)	0.4528 sec * +8%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Intel Core i7-13620H	0.4479 sec * +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U	0.443 sec * +10%
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Core 7 150U	0.4386 sec * +11%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2342 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

192.9 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.9 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

272 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

5883 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

673 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1737 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

15026 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	93 pt
Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	92.2 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	71 pt
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	66.8 pt
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Intel Core i7-13620H, UHD Graphics 64EUs	50.2 pt
Average of class Office	46 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	43.6 pt
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Core 7 150U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	43 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (23708 - 29544, n=11)	25839 KRay/s +9%
Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	23708 KRay/s
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	14712 KRay/s -38%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	14272 KRay/s -40%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Intel Core i7-13620H, UHD Graphics 64EUs	11083 KRay/s -53%
Average of class Office (763 - 24250, n=93, last 2 years)	9509 KRay/s -60%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	7909 KRay/s -67%
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Core 7 150U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	7856 KRay/s -67%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (99659 - 125873, n=11)	109203 Points +10%
Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	99659 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	77094 Points -23%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	76175 Points -24%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Intel Core i7-13620H, UHD Graphics 64EUs	54287 Points -46%
Average of class Office (4113 - 102228, n=93, last 2 years)	47876 Points -52%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	41382 Points -58%
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Core 7 150U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	40050 Points -60%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (4332 - 5180, n=11)	4708 MB/s +3%
Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	4551 MB/s
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	3545 MB/s -22%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	3508 MB/s -23%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Intel Core i7-13620H, UHD Graphics 64EUs	2357 MB/s -48%
Average of class Office (287 - 4551, n=93, last 2 years)	2264 MB/s -50%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2165 MB/s -52%
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Core 7 150U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	2108 MB/s -54%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (109458 - 124695, n=11)	116188 Points +1%
Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	115197 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	88106 Points -24%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	78009 Points -32%
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Core 7 150U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	70820 Points -39%
Average of class Office (8185 - 115197, n=93, last 2 years)	69271 Points -40%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	67123 Points -42%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Intel Core i7-13620H, UHD Graphics 64EUs	66885 Points -42%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (14062 - 15519, n=11)	14859 Points +6%
Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	14062 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	10012 Points -29%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	9030 Points -36%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Intel Core i7-13620H, UHD Graphics 64EUs	6737 Points -52%
Average of class Office (404 - 14288, n=93, last 2 years)	6693 Points -52%
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Core 7 150U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	5293 Points -62%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	5192 Points -63%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (53436 - 67367, n=11)	58328 Points +9%
Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	53705 Points
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	38466 Points -28%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	37438 Points -30%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Intel Core i7-13620H, UHD Graphics 64EUs	27242 Points -49%
Average of class Office (2075 - 54365, n=93, last 2 years)	25024 Points -53%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	20259 Points -62%
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Core 7 150U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	19915 Points -63%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	155900 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (64515 - 172642, n=11)	95038 MB/s -39%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Intel Core i7-13620H, UHD Graphics 64EUs	85895 MB/s -45%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	72068 MB/s -54%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	69238 MB/s -56%
Average of class Office (7254 - 155900, n=93, last 2 years)	51765 MB/s -67%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	41731 MB/s -73%
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Core 7 150U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	41601 MB/s -73%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1041 MB/s +8%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1004 MB/s +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (627 - 1080, n=11)	979 MB/s +2%
Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	964 MB/s
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Intel Core i7-13620H, UHD Graphics 64EUs	697 MB/s -28%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	650 MB/s -33%
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Core 7 150U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	627 MB/s -35%
Average of class Office (78 - 1018, n=93, last 2 years)	606 MB/s -37%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (12361 - 15911, n=11)	13740 KRay/s +11%
Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	12361 KRay/s
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	7936 KRay/s -36%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	7584 KRay/s -39%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Intel Core i7-13620H, UHD Graphics 64EUs	6077 KRay/s -51%
Average of class Office (432 - 12755, n=93, last 2 years)	5039 KRay/s -59%
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Core 7 150U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	4243 KRay/s -66%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	4213 KRay/s -66%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	52218 MPixel/s +35%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	39025 MPixel/s +1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (33192 - 41668, n=11)	38987 MPixel/s 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	38866 MPixel/s 0%
Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	38801 MPixel/s
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Core 7 150U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	36447 MPixel/s -6%
Average of class Office (4814 - 54971, n=93, last 2 years)	29143 MPixel/s -25%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Intel Core i7-13620H, UHD Graphics 64EUs	22766 MPixel/s -41%

系统性能

Ninkear A16 在 PCMark 10 中表现最佳，而 CrossMark 则稍逊一筹。

PCMark 10 / Score
Ninkear A16 Pro Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Authorain NV900-1T	7344 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (7120 - 7641, n=7)	7320 Points 0%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	6994 Points -5%
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Core 7 150U, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-1T00-1014	6704 Points -9%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	6247 Points -15%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Core 7 150U	6173 Points -16%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB UHD Graphics 64EUs, i7-13620H, Derlar FP3 NVMe M.2 SSD PCIe Gen 3.0X4 1 TB	5685 Points -23%
Average of class Office (2463 - 7344, n=86, last 2 years)	5627 Points -23%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Core 7 150U	11219 Points +2%
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Core 7 150U, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-1T00-1014	11094 Points 0%
Ninkear A16 Pro Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Authorain NV900-1T	11043 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (10685 - 11570, n=7)	11015 Points 0%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	10964 Points -1%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB UHD Graphics 64EUs, i7-13620H, Derlar FP3 NVMe M.2 SSD PCIe Gen 3.0X4 1 TB	10169 Points -8%
Average of class Office (5575 - 20841, n=86, last 2 years)	10099 Points -9%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	9459 Points -14%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Ninkear A16 Pro Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Authorain NV900-1T	10415 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (9787 - 10482, n=7)	10170 Points -2%
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Core 7 150U, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-1T00-1014	9407 Points -10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	8470 Points -19%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Core 7 150U	8399 Points -19%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	8215 Points -21%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB UHD Graphics 64EUs, i7-13620H, Derlar FP3 NVMe M.2 SSD PCIe Gen 3.0X4 1 TB	7794 Points -25%
Average of class Office (3041 - 10415, n=86, last 2 years)	7746 Points -26%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	9999 Points +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (9009 - 10009, n=7)	9506 Points +2%
Ninkear A16 Pro Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Authorain NV900-1T	9346 Points
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	8513 Points -9%
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Core 7 150U, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-1T00-1014	7837 Points -16%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Core 7 150U	6775 Points -28%
Average of class Office (2049 - 9773, n=86, last 2 years)	6351 Points -32%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB UHD Graphics 64EUs, i7-13620H, Derlar FP3 NVMe M.2 SSD PCIe Gen 3.0X4 1 TB	6294 Points -33%

CrossMark / Overall
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Core 7 150U, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-1T00-1014	1874 Points +13%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1633 - 1939, n=7)	1776 Points +8%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	1771 Points +7%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	1699 Points +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Core 7 150U	1660 Points 0%
Ninkear A16 Pro Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Authorain NV900-1T	1652 Points
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB UHD Graphics 64EUs, i7-13620H, Derlar FP3 NVMe M.2 SSD PCIe Gen 3.0X4 1 TB	1493 Points -10%
Average of class Office (348 - 1891, n=88, last 2 years)	1398 Points -15%

CrossMark / Productivity
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Core 7 150U, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-1T00-1014	1901 Points +22%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1562 - 1872, n=7)	1711 Points +10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	1704 Points +9%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	1656 Points +6%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Core 7 150U	1649 Points +6%
Ninkear A16 Pro Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Authorain NV900-1T	1562 Points
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB UHD Graphics 64EUs, i7-13620H, Derlar FP3 NVMe M.2 SSD PCIe Gen 3.0X4 1 TB	1473 Points -6%
Average of class Office (393 - 1870, n=88, last 2 years)	1395 Points -11%

CrossMark / Creativity
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	1916 Points +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1734 - 2040, n=7)	1912 Points +5%
Ninkear A16 Pro Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Authorain NV900-1T	1822 Points
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Core 7 150U, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-1T00-1014	1821 Points 0%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	1803 Points -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Core 7 150U	1730 Points -5%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB UHD Graphics 64EUs, i7-13620H, Derlar FP3 NVMe M.2 SSD PCIe Gen 3.0X4 1 TB	1581 Points -13%
Average of class Office (340 - 1982, n=88, last 2 years)	1457 Points -20%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Core 7 150U, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-1T00-1014	1956 Points +34%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1437 - 1849, n=7)	1595 Points +10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	1572 Points +8%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	1539 Points +6%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Core 7 150U	1493 Points +3%
Ninkear A16 Pro Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Authorain NV900-1T	1456 Points
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB UHD Graphics 64EUs, i7-13620H, Derlar FP3 NVMe M.2 SSD PCIe Gen 3.0X4 1 TB	1307 Points -10%
Average of class Office (258 - 2017, n=88, last 2 years)	1259 Points -14%

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Core 7 150U	307 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (295 - 334, n=7)	307 Points +3%
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Core 7 150U, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-1T00-1014	305 Points +2%
Ninkear A16 Pro Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Authorain NV900-1T	299 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	279 Points -7%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB UHD Graphics 64EUs, i7-13620H, Derlar FP3 NVMe M.2 SSD PCIe Gen 3.0X4 1 TB	272 Points -9%
Average of class Office (121 - 455, n=86, last 2 years)	259 Points -13%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	256 Points -14%

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Core 7 150U, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-1T00-1014	281 Points +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Core 7 150U	276 Points +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (245 - 314, n=7)	263 Points +2%
Ninkear A16 Pro Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Authorain NV900-1T	257 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	252 Points -2%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	234 Points -9%
Average of class Office (80 - 328, n=86, last 2 years)	217 Points -16%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Average of class Office (404 - 1966, n=94, last 2 years)	687 ms * -30%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	573 ms * -8%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	573 ms * -8%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (501 - 664, n=7)	541 ms * -2%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB UHD Graphics 64EUs, i7-13620H, Derlar FP3 NVMe M.2 SSD PCIe Gen 3.0X4 1 TB	532 ms * -0%
Ninkear A16 Pro Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Authorain NV900-1T	530 ms *
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	528 ms * -0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Core 7 150U	502 ms * +5%
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Core 7 150U, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-1T00-1014	463 ms * +13%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score		7344 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	93443 MB/s +47%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (61459 - 71873, n=11)	67394 MB/s +6%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	66880 MB/s +5%
Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	63614 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	61190 MB/s -4%
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Core 7 150U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	55527 MB/s -13%
Average of class Office (7158 - 108783, n=94, last 2 years)	49489 MB/s -22%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Intel Core i7-13620H, UHD Graphics 64EUs	38066 MB/s -40%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	85824 MB/s +39%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	73708 MB/s +20%
Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	61558 MB/s
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Core 7 150U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	60894 MB/s -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (49866 - 61976, n=11)	58208 MB/s -5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	51757 MB/s -16%
Average of class Office (7325 - 127282, n=94, last 2 years)	50494 MB/s -18%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Intel Core i7-13620H, UHD Graphics 64EUs	40342 MB/s -34%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (68425 - 93239, n=11)	85626 MB/s +25%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	78327 MB/s +14%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	69181 MB/s +1%
Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	68425 MB/s
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	66061 MB/s -3%
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Core 7 150U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	59016 MB/s -14%
Average of class Office (7579 - 117935, n=94, last 2 years)	53522 MB/s -22%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Intel Core i7-13620H, UHD Graphics 64EUs	38595 MB/s -44%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	140.2 ns * -20%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	139.9 ns * -20%
Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	117 ns *
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	100 ns * +15%
Average of class Office (6.9 - 185.2, n=93, last 2 years)	97.1 ns * +17%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (82.5 - 117, n=11)	96.9 ns * +17%
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Core 7 150U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	89.7 ns * +23%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Intel Core i7-13620H, UHD Graphics 64EUs	75.9 ns * +35%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

启动 LatencyMon 后，只要我们移动鼠标指针，就会出现一些小问题。在打开浏览器时，这些问题的增加幅度很小；随后打开多个标签页对延迟值不再有任何影响。在播放 4K/60 fps YouTube 视频时，虽然在 10 秒的 Prime95 测试中延迟值略有增加，但没有出现任何掉帧现象。不过，总的来说，延迟值并不高，甚至是比较中第二低的。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	2995.3 μs * -122%
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Core 7 150U, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-1T00-1014	2733.7 μs * -102%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Core 7 150U	2145.8 μs * -59%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB UHD Graphics 64EUs, i7-13620H, Derlar FP3 NVMe M.2 SSD PCIe Gen 3.0X4 1 TB	1563.3 μs * -16%
Ninkear A16 Pro Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Authorain NV900-1T	1352.1 μs *
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	600.7 μs * +56%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

HWinfo 也与固态硬盘相匹配--我们在笔记本电脑内部发现了一个名为 "Authorain "的品牌，容量为 1TB。谷歌搜索也没有发现任何相关信息，但我们知道，它已经今非昔比。铭牌上写着 6GB/s 的速度，但我们测得的速度约为 2GB/s。竞争对手的机型速度更快，但在实际使用中你不会注意到太多。

在持续的压力下，它的性能保持了很长时间，但在测试的最后三分之一时间里，它的性能略有下降。

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Authorain NV900-1T

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2075 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1678 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 535 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 381 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 57 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 196.1 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 846 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 934 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-1T00-1014	95.4 pt
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	78.6 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	66 pt
Average of class Office	64.4 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9	62.2 pt
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Derlar FP3 NVMe M.2 SSD PCIe Gen 3.0X4 1 TB	49.8 pt
Ninkear A16 Pro Authorain NV900-1T	45.5 pt
Average Authorain NV900-1T	45.5 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-1T00-1014	3273 (3194.7^min - 3273.03^max) MB/s +58%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9	3065 (3026.4^min - 3064.99^max) MB/s +48%
Average of class Office (121 - 4554, n=90, last 2 years)	2691 MB/s +30%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	2254 (2201.38^min - 2254.23^max) MB/s +9%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Derlar FP3 NVMe M.2 SSD PCIe Gen 3.0X4 1 TB	2155 (2140.02^min - 2154.61^max) MB/s +4%
Ninkear A16 Pro Authorain NV900-1T	2073 (2068.27^min - 2072.87^max) MB/s
Average Authorain NV900-1T ()	2073 MB/s 0%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	2049 (2028.99^min - 2049.34^max) MB/s -1%
seq write
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-1T00-1014	4317 (4246.1^min - 4316.53^max) MB/s +146%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	3229 (3069.6^min - 3229.15^max) MB/s +84%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9	3064 (2803.89^min - 3063.78^max) MB/s +75%
Average of class Office (43 - 5842, n=90, last 2 years)	2614 MB/s +49%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	2330 (2272.26^min - 2329.73^max) MB/s +33%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Derlar FP3 NVMe M.2 SSD PCIe Gen 3.0X4 1 TB	1777 (1742.1^min - 1776.92^max) MB/s +1%
Ninkear A16 Pro Authorain NV900-1T	1752 (1704.98^min - 1752.17^max) MB/s
Average Authorain NV900-1T ()	1752 MB/s 0%
seq q8 t1 read
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-1T00-1014	5245 (4687.55^min - 5244.97^max) MB/s +149%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9	4978 (4332.09^min - 4978.22^max) MB/s +136%
Average of class Office (124.2 - 7120, n=90, last 2 years)	4464 MB/s +112%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	3727 (3040.66^min - 3726.94^max) MB/s +77%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	3645 (2982.87^min - 3645.22^max) MB/s +73%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Derlar FP3 NVMe M.2 SSD PCIe Gen 3.0X4 1 TB	2423 (2135.82^min - 2423.47^max) MB/s +15%
Ninkear A16 Pro Authorain NV900-1T	2107 (1922.53^min - 2107.2^max) MB/s
Average Authorain NV900-1T ()	2107 MB/s 0%
seq q8 t1 write
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9	4561 (4547.04^min - 4560.99^max) MB/s +169%
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-1T00-1014	4403 (4374.24^min - 4402.55^max) MB/s +160%
Average of class Office (46.7 - 6791, n=90, last 2 years)	3454 MB/s +104%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	3269 (3263.59^min - 3269^max) MB/s +93%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	2409 (2377.61^min - 2408.59^max) MB/s +42%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Derlar FP3 NVMe M.2 SSD PCIe Gen 3.0X4 1 TB	1989 (1981.39^min - 1988.94^max) MB/s +17%
Ninkear A16 Pro Authorain NV900-1T	1694 (1658.88^min - 1693.63^max) MB/s
Average Authorain NV900-1T ()	1694 MB/s 0%
4k q1 t1 read
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-1T00-1014	83.3 (81.53^min - 83.32^max) MB/s +76%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9	63.8 (62.67^min - 63.75^max) MB/s +35%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	60.5 (59.69^min - 60.52^max) MB/s +28%
Average of class Office (5.55 - 89.9, n=90, last 2 years)	58.3 MB/s +24%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	54.8 (51.93^min - 54.84^max) MB/s +16%
Ninkear A16 Pro Authorain NV900-1T	47.2 (46.94^min - 47.15^max) MB/s
Average Authorain NV900-1T ()	47.2 MB/s 0%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Derlar FP3 NVMe M.2 SSD PCIe Gen 3.0X4 1 TB	44.3 (43.82^min - 44.34^max) MB/s -6%
4k q1 t1 write
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-1T00-1014	311 (306.79^min - 311.34^max) MB/s +45%
Ninkear A16 Pro Authorain NV900-1T	215 (210.88^min - 215.42^max) MB/s
Average Authorain NV900-1T ()	215 MB/s 0%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	206 (197.33^min - 206.13^max) MB/s -4%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Derlar FP3 NVMe M.2 SSD PCIe Gen 3.0X4 1 TB	198.6 (192.66^min - 198.55^max) MB/s -8%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	193 (186.4^min - 192.95^max) MB/s -10%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9	178 (170.53^min - 178.04^max) MB/s -17%
Average of class Office (1.23 - 429, n=90, last 2 years)	164.2 MB/s -24%
4k q32 t16 read
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-1T00-1014	2796 (2683.72^min - 2796.09^max) MB/s +209%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	1947 (1678.71^min - 1946.99^max) MB/s +115%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	1684 (1639.23^min - 1684.06^max) MB/s +86%
Average of class Office (7.49 - 4425, n=90, last 2 years)	1246 MB/s +38%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Derlar FP3 NVMe M.2 SSD PCIe Gen 3.0X4 1 TB	1158 (1156.21^min - 1158.26^max) MB/s +28%
Ninkear A16 Pro Authorain NV900-1T	905 (898.75^min - 904.6^max) MB/s
Average Authorain NV900-1T ()	905 MB/s 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9	715 (699.07^min - 715.11^max) MB/s -21%
4k q32 t16 write
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	2441 (2399.8^min - 2440.79^max) MB/s +139%
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-1T00-1014	2410 (2182.33^min - 2409.85^max) MB/s +136%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Derlar FP3 NVMe M.2 SSD PCIe Gen 3.0X4 1 TB	1145 (1128.15^min - 1145.38^max) MB/s +12%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	1142 (1093.19^min - 1142.3^max) MB/s +12%
Ninkear A16 Pro Authorain NV900-1T	1020 (998.49^min - 1019.8^max) MB/s
Average Authorain NV900-1T ()	1020 MB/s 0%
Average of class Office (1.5 - 3254, n=90, last 2 years)	926 MB/s -9%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9	444 (433.94^min - 444.21^max) MB/s -56%

AS SSD
Score Total
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-1T00-1014	6536 Points +145%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	6090 Points +129%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	4369 Points +64%
Average of class Office (704 - 9204, n=87, last 2 years)	4198 Points +58%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9	3740 Points +40%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Derlar FP3 NVMe M.2 SSD PCIe Gen 3.0X4 1 TB	3062 Points +15%
Ninkear A16 Pro Authorain NV900-1T	2665 Points
Average Authorain NV900-1T ()	2665 Points 0%
Score Read
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-1T00-1014	2609 Points +134%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	2411 Points +116%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	1511 Points +36%
Average of class Office (252 - 3364, n=87, last 2 years)	1464 Points +31%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9	1182 Points +6%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Derlar FP3 NVMe M.2 SSD PCIe Gen 3.0X4 1 TB	1133 Points +2%
Ninkear A16 Pro Authorain NV900-1T	1115 Points
Average Authorain NV900-1T ()	1115 Points 0%
Score Write
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-1T00-1014	2694 Points +173%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	2437 Points +147%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	2107 Points +113%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9	2038 Points +106%
Average of class Office (247 - 4111, n=87, last 2 years)	2027 Points +105%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Derlar FP3 NVMe M.2 SSD PCIe Gen 3.0X4 1 TB	1367 Points +38%
Ninkear A16 Pro Authorain NV900-1T	988 Points
Average Authorain NV900-1T ()	988 Points 0%
Seq Read
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-1T00-1014	4471 MB/s +135%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9	4057.88 MB/s +113%
Average of class Office (508 - 5796, n=87, last 2 years)	3494 MB/s +83%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	3252 MB/s +71%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	2868.99 MB/s +51%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Derlar FP3 NVMe M.2 SSD PCIe Gen 3.0X4 1 TB	2289 MB/s +20%
Ninkear A16 Pro Authorain NV900-1T	1905 MB/s
Average Authorain NV900-1T ()	1905 MB/s 0%
Seq Write
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	2908.39 MB/s +85%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	2714 MB/s +72%
Average of class Office (294 - 5880, n=87, last 2 years)	2394 MB/s +52%
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-1T00-1014	2257 MB/s +43%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9	2060.59 MB/s +31%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Derlar FP3 NVMe M.2 SSD PCIe Gen 3.0X4 1 TB	1781 MB/s +13%
Ninkear A16 Pro Authorain NV900-1T	1575 MB/s
Average Authorain NV900-1T ()	1575 MB/s 0%
4K Read
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-1T00-1014	76.1 MB/s +77%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	68.68 MB/s +60%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9	59.03 MB/s +38%
Average of class Office (18 - 91.1, n=87, last 2 years)	58.1 MB/s +35%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	46.9 MB/s +9%
Ninkear A16 Pro Authorain NV900-1T	42.9 MB/s
Average Authorain NV900-1T ()	42.9 MB/s 0%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Derlar FP3 NVMe M.2 SSD PCIe Gen 3.0X4 1 TB	41.7 MB/s -3%
4K Write
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-1T00-1014	268 MB/s +50%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9	228.11 MB/s +28%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	182.5 MB/s +2%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	178.65 MB/s 0%
Ninkear A16 Pro Authorain NV900-1T	178.5 MB/s
Average Authorain NV900-1T ()	178.5 MB/s 0%
Average of class Office (28.2 - 350, n=87, last 2 years)	166.8 MB/s -7%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Derlar FP3 NVMe M.2 SSD PCIe Gen 3.0X4 1 TB	164.4 MB/s -8%
4K-64 Read
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-1T00-1014	2086 MB/s +137%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	2055.8 MB/s +133%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	1138 MB/s +29%
Average of class Office (182.3 - 2713, n=87, last 2 years)	1057 MB/s +20%
Ninkear A16 Pro Authorain NV900-1T	881 MB/s
Average Authorain NV900-1T ()	881 MB/s 0%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Derlar FP3 NVMe M.2 SSD PCIe Gen 3.0X4 1 TB	862 MB/s -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9	717.05 MB/s -19%
4K-64 Write
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-1T00-1014	2201 MB/s +238%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	1967.43 MB/s +202%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	1653 MB/s +154%
Average of class Office (183.4 - 3394, n=87, last 2 years)	1621 MB/s +149%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9	1603.4 MB/s +146%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Derlar FP3 NVMe M.2 SSD PCIe Gen 3.0X4 1 TB	1024 MB/s +57%
Ninkear A16 Pro Authorain NV900-1T	652 MB/s
Average Authorain NV900-1T ()	652 MB/s 0%
Access Time Read
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Derlar FP3 NVMe M.2 SSD PCIe Gen 3.0X4 1 TB	0.101 ms * -15%
Ninkear A16 Pro Authorain NV900-1T	0.088 ms *
Average Authorain NV900-1T ()	0.088 ms * -0%
Average of class Office (0.022 - 0.302, n=87, last 2 years)	0.08 ms * +9%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	0.07 ms * +20%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9	0.066 ms * +25%
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-1T00-1014	0.056 ms * +36%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	0.022 ms * +75%
Access Time Write
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9	0.289 ms * -141%
Ninkear A16 Pro Authorain NV900-1T	0.12 ms *
Average Authorain NV900-1T ()	0.12 ms * -0%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	0.101 ms * +16%
Average of class Office (0.016 - 0.625, n=87, last 2 years)	0.06994 ms * +42%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Derlar FP3 NVMe M.2 SSD PCIe Gen 3.0X4 1 TB	0.04 ms * +67%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	0.028 ms * +77%
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-1T00-1014	0.014 ms * +88%

* ... smaller is better

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Ninkear A16 Pro Authorain NV900-1T; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø2073 (1608.86-2117.7)

Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Derlar FP3 NVMe M.2 SSD PCIe Gen 3.0X4 1 TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø2385 (2159.02-2408.59)

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø3215 (2929.72-3237.37)

Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-1T00-1014; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø3805 (2866.6-5145.14)

Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 ; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4452 (3891.66-4533.62)

Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø3612 (3081.97-3641.23)

图形卡

集成在 CPU 中的 Radeon 780M 可用于 3D 应用。您不会用它来玩任何当前要求苛刻的游戏，但它应该足以满足多媒体应用和至少一些轻度游戏的需求。

在 3DMark 测试中，它的表现达到了目标水平，超过了 Ninkear N16 Pro 内的老式英特尔UHD Graphics 。与酷睿 7 155H 中的 Arc 8 Graphics 相比，我们的 A16 Pro 在速度极快的红米本和速度相当慢的 Medion S10 之间排名居中，两者都采用了相同的英特尔 iGPU。

即使在通过Fire Strike 进行的 3D 测试中，A16 Pro 在远离电源插座的情况下也没有性能下降。

在游戏中，它的表现甚至略好于配备英特尔图形处理器的红米本，这表明英特尔的驱动程序仍在浪费大量潜力。老游戏和要求不高的游戏（如《GTA V》）也可以在全高清和高细节下运行，而当前的游戏（如《赛博朋克》）最多只能在全高清和中等细节下流畅运行，但你更可能需要选择最低细节。在《 赛博朋克 2077》的续航测试中，它的表现非常出色和稳定。

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core 7 150U	99.8 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 ^-1! Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	98.4 pt
Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	80.8 pt
Average AMD Radeon 780M	78.8 pt
Medion S10 OLED ^-1! Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	67.8 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core 7 150U	48.4 pt
Average of class Office	46 pt
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen), Intel Core i7-13620H	37.8 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core 7 150U	13694 Points +9%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13381 Points +7%
Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	12550 Points
Average AMD Radeon 780M (7868 - 14249, n=56)	12460 Points -1%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	9156 Points -27%
Average of class Office (1468 - 13132, n=89, last 2 years)	6812 Points -46%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core 7 150U	6438 Points -49%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen), Intel Core i7-13620H	5360 Points -57%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core 7 150U	65047 Points +32%
Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	49373 Points
Average AMD Radeon 780M (27771 - 53972, n=29)	46628 Points -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core 7 150U	33070 Points -33%
Average of class Office (7982 - 58068, n=63, last 2 years)	26834 Points -46%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen), Intel Core i7-13620H	24946 Points -49%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core 7 150U	9886 Points +24%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	9650 Points +21%
Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	7993 Points
Average AMD Radeon 780M (4550 - 8816, n=58)	7747 Points -3%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	6365 Points -20%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core 7 150U	5237 Points -34%
Average of class Office (736 - 9375, n=91, last 2 years)	4858 Points -39%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen), Intel Core i7-13620H	4065 Points -49%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3656 Points +34%
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core 7 150U	3626 Points +33%
Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2732 Points
Average AMD Radeon 780M (1496 - 3196, n=58)	2713 Points -1%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2643 Points -3%
Average of class Office (313 - 4109, n=90, last 2 years)	1603 Points -41%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core 7 150U	1567 Points -43%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen), Intel Core i7-13620H	1192 Points -56%

3DMark 11 Performance		12346 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		37413 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		7279 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		3068 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score		2714 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender - v3.3 Classroom CPU
Average of class Office (343 - 3964, n=90, last 2 years)	762 Seconds * -116%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core 7 150U	689 Seconds * -96%
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core 7 150U	659 Seconds * -87%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen), Intel Core i7-13620H	506 Seconds * -44%
Average AMD Radeon 780M (300 - 664, n=54)	375 Seconds * -7%
Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	352 Seconds *
Medion S10 OLED Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	347 Seconds * +1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	344 Seconds * +2%

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating - Percent
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Core 7 150U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	100 pt
Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	63.5 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 ^-1! Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	61.8 pt
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	44.5 pt
Average of class Office	40.3 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	38.2 pt
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB ^-3! Intel Core i7-13620H, Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)	28.7 pt

Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Core 7 150U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	37 fps +37%
Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	27 fps
Average of class Office (7.96 - 28.9, n=19, last 2 years)	16.9 fps -37%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	14.7 (8.76^min, 8.87^P0.1, 9.07^P1) fps -46%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	9.3 fps -66%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Core 7 150U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	50.3 (12.4^min, 32.3^P1) fps +100%
Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	25.1 (3.5^min, 16.4^P1) fps
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	15.9 (2.93^min, 11.4^P1) fps -37%
Average of class Office (3.35 - 47.8, n=79, last 2 years)	12.9 fps -49%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	11.4 (1.718^min, 8.77^P1) fps -55%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	10.5 (4.93^min, 6.67^P1) fps -58%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Intel Core i7-13620H, Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)	6.21 (3.3^min, 5.03^P1) fps -75%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Core 7 150U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	39.3 fps +46%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	30.6 fps +13%
Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	27 fps
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	20.9 fps -23%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	17.6 fps -35%
Average of class Office (3.86 - 35.7, n=87, last 2 years)	16.1 fps -40%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Intel Core i7-13620H, Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)	12.8 fps -53%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Core 7 150U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	62.8 (46.5^min, 48.8^P1) fps +38%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	53 fps +16%
Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	45.6 (11.1^min, 17.7^P1) fps
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	35.6 (5^min, 6.04^P1) fps -22%
Average of class Office (9.6 - 56.5, n=70, last 2 years)	27.3 fps -40%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	25.3 (5.1^min, 6.9^P1) fps -45%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Core 7 150U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	110.6 (92.5^min) fps +57%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	79.8 (51.5^min) fps +13%
Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	70.6 (54.4^min) fps
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	60.6 (38.4^min) fps -14%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	60.1 (51^min) fps -15%
Average of class Office (13.4 - 121.2, n=95, last 2 years)	51.2 fps -27%
Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Intel Core i7-13620H, Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)	45.5 (41.6^min) fps -36%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Core 7 150U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	75.5 fps +88%
Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	40.1 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	33 fps -18%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	32.4 fps -19%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	30.2 fps -25%
Average of class Office (8.88 - 92.6, n=91, last 2 years)	29.9 fps -25%

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram

Ninkear A16 Pro R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M: Ø20.7 (19.3-21.1)

Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB i7-13620H, UHD Graphics 64EUs: Ø7.34 (6.44-7.49)

Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Core 7 150U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile: Ø20.2 (19-20.7)

Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs: Ø12.9 (12.4-13.2)

Medion S10 OLED Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core: Ø13.8 (11.3-15.8)

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD
GTA V (2015)	162.2	149.8	62.2	25.1	17.4
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	148.4	117.9	76.4	70.6
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	74.3	37.2	27		19.3
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	64.9	47.8	40.1
Strange Brigade (2018)	149.3	62.6	53	45.6
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)	42	33.3	27.5	27
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023)	39.2	31	24.9	21.8

排放与动力 - 安静、凉爽的 Ninkear

噪音排放

在空闲模式下，风扇基本处于关闭状态。在负载情况下，它的声音也不是特别大；我们的 A16 Pro 仍然是对比中最安静的。

在 3DMark 06 测试--中等负载情况下，风扇的转速与安静的红米本相当，只有在最后才会更高。

Noise Level

Idle		23 / 23 / 23 dB(A)
Load		37.68 / 37.41 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23 dB(A)

	Ninkear A16 Pro Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Authorain NV900-1T	Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB UHD Graphics 64EUs, i7-13620H, Derlar FP3 NVMe M.2 SSD PCIe Gen 3.0X4 1 TB	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Core 7 150U, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-1T00-1014	Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Core 7 150U	Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7
Noise		-8%	-3%	-18%	-5%	-16%
off / environment *	23	25 -9%	24.4 -6%	23 -0%	23 -0%	25 -9%
Idle Minimum *	23	25 -9%	24.4 -6%	23 -0%	23 -0%	26 -13%
Idle Average *	23	25 -9%	24.4 -6%	23 -0%	23 -0%	27 -17%
Idle Maximum *	23	25 -9%	24.4 -6%	31 -35%	23 -0%	28 -22%
Load Average *	37.68	35.4 6%	32 15%	46.57 -24%	43.3 -15%	43 -14%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	37.68	43.5 -15%		50 -33%	40.8 -8%	42 -11%
Load Maximum *	37.41	42.2 -13%	39.7 -6%	50 -34%	40.9 -9%	48 -28%
Witcher 3 ultra *			30.6

* ... smaller is better

温度

只有在笔记本底部的显示屏中央才会非常热。我们在这里发现了一个约 50 °C的热点。其他地方的温度变化都比较适中，最高温度为 43 °C，掌托的温度也明显较低。不过，小型 USB-C 电源的温度高达 56 °C。

Max. Load

Cyberpunk


42 °C	43 °C	39 °C
38 °C	41 °C	34 °C
27 °C	31 °C	29 °C

Maximum: 43 °C
Average: 36 °C


40 °C	50 °C	38 °C
30 °C	36 °C	30 °C
27 °C	29 °C	27 °C

Maximum: 50 °C
Average: 34.1 °C

Power Supply (max.) 54 °C | Room Temperature 18.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 35.7 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the class Office.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-3.4 °C / -6.1 F).

	Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB Intel Core i7-13620H, Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Intel Core 7 150U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Heat		8%	7%	-5%	26%	-19%
Maximum Upper Side *	43	35.1 18%	40.3 6%	47 -9%	35.4 18%	55 -28%
Maximum Bottom *	50	51 -2%	45.9 8%	50 -0%	33 34%	55 -10%
Idle Upper Side *		27.1	26.3	31	30.2	32
Idle Bottom *		33.8	27.9	32	30.2	33

* ... smaller is better

发言人

扬声器的音质一般，几乎无法重现低音，播放音量也令人失望。模拟音频设备可通过插孔输出连接。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Ninkear A16 Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.63 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

耗电量

其功耗相当低，尤其是在空闲时。在负载情况下，它的功耗略有上升，但与其性能相比仍然合适。遗憾的是，我们在这里没有找到红米本的比较值，而其他性能较弱的竞争对手在负载情况下的功耗更低。在测量空闲时的耗电量时，显示屏的亮度也不小，低亮度和全亮度之间的耗电量约为 4 至 5 瓦。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.4 / 1.2 Watt
Idle	6.5 / 10.7 / 11.1 Watt
Load	68.5 / 107 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test

Ninkear A16 Pro; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø72.3 (69.02-98.09)

Ninkear A16 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø8.28 (7.507-10.095)

Ninkear A16 Pro; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø72.8 (65.5-81.94)

Power consumption with external monitor

Ninkear A16 Pro; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø69.1 (67.94-96.52)

Ninkear A16 Pro; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø60.5 (59.915-61.28)

Ninkear A16 Pro; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø60.9 (59.894-73.12)

Ninkear A16 Pro; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø106.1 (103.55-106.55)

Ninkear A16 Pro; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø6.27 (5.7212-7.319)

Ninkear A16 Pro; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø104.6 (102.6-105.88)

运行时间

Ninkear 配备了 80 瓦时的大容量电池，这比竞争对手（红米本除外）的电池容量更大。不过，至少在我们的测试中，这款笔记本的续航时间并不比竞争对手长。 7.在 WLAN 测试中，5 个小时的续航时间总体上还可以，但一些竞争对手的续航时间似乎更长，而容量却更小。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing		7h 30min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 29min

	Ninkear A16 Pro R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, 80 Wh	Ninkear N16-Pro-32+1TB i7-13620H, UHD Graphics 64EUs, 57.75 Wh	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 99 Wh	Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 Core 7 150U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, 48.5 Wh	Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 57 Wh	Medion S10 OLED Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 70 Wh	Average of class Office
Battery Runtime		-28%	79%	41%	38%	-3%	34%
WiFi v1.3	450	322 -28%	983 118%	607 35%	761 69%	436 -3%	608 ?(230 - 1349, n=93, last 2 years) 35%
Load	89		124 39%	130 46%	94 6%		117.4 ?(56 - 218, n=56, last 2 years) 32%
H.264			1308	498			716 ?(348 - 1501, n=32, last 2 years)
Reader / Idle					1568		1234 ?(130 - 2296, n=19, last 2 years)

Notebookcheck 总评分

Ninkear A16 Pro 在许多方面都给我们留下了深刻的印象，由于它采用了物美价廉的元件，在重要的方面给人的感觉甚至比一些价格更高的竞争对手更好。

Back to the verdict

Ninkear A16 Pro - 10/24/2024 v8
Christian Hintze

Chassis

73 / 98 → 75%

Keyboard

85%

Pointing Device

67%

Connectivity

56 / 80 → 70%

Weight

65 / 20-75 → 82%

Battery

77%

Display

84%

Games Performance

53 / 75 → 70%

Application Performance

83 / 92 → 91%

AI Performance

90%

Temperature

83%

Noise

90%

Audio

61%

Camera

23 / 75 → 31%

Average

56%

80%

Office - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
0%

Packaging
15%

Power Use
77.1%

Repairability
45%

Software Updates
22.3%

Total Sustainability Score: 26.6%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 350 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 470333 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Ninkear A16 Pro 笔记本电脑评测：经济实惠、功能强大、使用安静

Christian Hintze, 2024-10-29 (Update: 2024-10-29)

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit in comparison
Lenovo B50-30 (min) N2815, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	49
...
Asus ROG Ally X Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M	2336
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	2337
AMD Ryzen 5 7600 R5 7600, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	2339
Ninkear A16 Pro R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	2342
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	2343
Minisforum Neptune Series HX77G R7 7735HS, Radeon RX 6600M	2343
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	2346
...
(max) TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation	15842

3DMark 11 in comparison
HP Stream 7 5700ng (min) Z3735G, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	183
...
Alienware 13 R3 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	12319
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 i9-9980HK, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	12340
Fujitsu Celsius H970 E3-1535M v6, Quadro P4000	12346
Ninkear A16 Pro R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	12346
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN980-U 6400, GeForce GTX 980	12348
SCHENKER XMG P507 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	12349
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS 6700K, GeForce GTX 980M	12364
...
(max) R7 9800X3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	77609

评价--优点很多，缺点很少

Pros

Cons

价格和供应情况

可能的替代品比较

Table of Contents

规格

外壳和连接性 - A16 Pro 存在许多未知因素

尺寸比较

连接性

可持续性

输入设备 - 键盘性能良好，触摸板按键噪音大

显示屏 - Ninkear，1600p，400 尼特，120 赫兹

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能 - 配备 AMD Hawk Point 的 A16 Pro

测试条件

处理器

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

系统性能

DPC 延迟

存储设备

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram

排放与动力 - 安静、凉爽的 Ninkear

噪音排放

温度

发言人

Ninkear A16 Pro audio analysis

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

耗电量

Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test

Power consumption with external monitor

运行时间

Notebookcheck 总评分

Transparency