华为Nova 9 SE评论。拥有108MP摄像头的别致智能手机
可能的竞争对手比较
外壳和功能。新星9 SE无DRM认证
华为Nova 9 SE有三种颜色版本。水晶蓝、午夜黑和珍珠白。我们的水晶蓝评测样品具有吸引人的彩虹色的背面。建造质量也令人印象深刻，以紧密和均匀的缝隙而令人信服。这款智能手机可以经受住扭曲测试，没有任何吱吱作响。
没有防尘和防水的IP认证。一般来说，华为在功能方面有点小气。双SIM卡可用，但没有通过microSD进行内存扩展的选项，也没有音频插孔。USB 2.0端口支持OTG，因此可以连接外部外设和存储设备。DRM认证也不可用，所以相应的受保护内容只能以SD质量消费。
尺寸比较
通信、软件和操作
华为依靠的是 高通骁龙680在Nova 9 SE中使用4G SoC。虽然该芯片组的骁龙X11调制解调器不支持5G，但它仍然相当快，即使在LTE网络中也能达到390MBit/s（下载）。Wi-Fi模块支持2.4和5.0GHz网络，在使用我们的参考路由器华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000进行测试时，具有预期的速度和高度稳定的数据率。
使用的操作系统是Android 11，没有谷歌服务，由华为内部的EMUI 12用户界面分层在上面。应用程序可以通过AppGallery安装，但许多知名的通信平台，如WhatsApp或Signal仍然缺失。然而，缺失的应用程序可以通过相关网站的花瓣搜索来安装，但这并不容易处理，特别是对于不太懂技术的用户。在测试时，安全补丁已于2022年3月1日更新，仍然是合理的最新版本。华为在这里的目标可能是一个季度的更新节奏。
华为Nova 9 SE的电容式触摸屏对输入有可靠的反应，并能精确地实现它们。在工厂里，屏幕保护膜被预先贴在未指定的玻璃上，这略微降低了滑行性能。
指纹扫描仪已被集成到电源按钮上，用于生物识别安全，它可以快速可靠地解锁智能手机。此外，也可以通过前置摄像头进行面部识别，其工作速度更快，但也不太安全。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Huawei Nova 9 SE | |
| Samsung Galaxy M23 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 | |
| Oppo A76 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Samsung Galaxy M23 | |
| Huawei Nova 9 SE | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 | |
| Oppo A76 | |
照相机。华为智能手机中强大的主要光学器件
华为Nova 9 SE的前置摄像头可以拍出相当体面的照片，但在较重的照明条件下很快就会失去对比度。
主摄像头的核心是一个10800万像素的传感器（三星HM2，S5KHM2），它能拍出吸引人的照片。然而，骁龙680的图像处理器对此有点负担过重，因为它名义上只支持高达64MP。这并没有降低照片的质量，但确实影响了速度。这并不严重，但仍然很明显。其他镜头是较好的配件，但最多只能提供在线使用的可用结果。
说到电影，全高清和每秒30帧是最棒的。至少有一个4K的选项肯定会很好。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
HauptkameraHauptkameraUltraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLow-Light
显示。非常精确和无闪烁的LCD
华为Nova 9 SE的6.78英寸LC屏幕提供了清晰的显示。刷新率可以设置为60或90赫兹，或者系统可以在这两个数值之间自动切换。
平均523cd/m²的亮度是体面的，在手动模式以及APL测量中也能达到。然而，在明亮的日子里，在户外使用该设备时，必须考虑到各种限制。由于黑值相当高，对比度也相当平庸。然而，显示器的色彩再现和白平衡是非常好的。此外，没有使用脉冲宽度调制（PWM）来控制亮度。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 546 cd/m²
Contrast: 728:1 (Black: 0.75 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 0.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
| Huawei Nova 9 SE LCD, 2388x1080, 6.8" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 OLED, 2400x1080, 6.4" | Oppo A76 IPS, 1612x720, 6.6" | Samsung Galaxy M23 IPS, 2408x1080, 6.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | 89% | -100% | -71% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 41.28 ? | 1.135 ? 97% | 41 ? 1% | 36 ? 13% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 8.63 ? | 1.635 ? 81% | 26 ? -201% | 22 ? -155% |
| PWM Frequency | 171.4 | |||
| Screen | -34% | -66% | -203% | |
| Brightness middle | 546 | 702 29% | 569 4% | 551 1% |
| Brightness | 523 | 701 34% | 562 7% | 525 0% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 98 5% | 90 -3% | 87 -6% |
| Black Level * | 0.75 | 0.5 33% | 0.4 47% | |
| Contrast | 728 | 1138 56% | 1378 89% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.6 | 1 -67% | 2.16 -260% | 4.57 -662% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 1 | 2.3 -130% | 3.37 -237% | 6.56 -556% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 0.8 | 1.4 -75% | 1.8 -125% | 5.1 -538% |
| Gamma | 2.25 98% | 2.2 100% | 2.177 101% | 2.31 95% |
| CCT | 6540 99% | 6520 100% | 6784 96% | 7750 84% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 28% /
-3% | -83% /
-73% | -137% /
-177% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 8.63 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.65 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 41.28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.97 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 23.31 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能、排放和电池寿命
华为Nova 9 SE搭载了一台 高通Snapdragon 680 4GSoC，配备8GB LPDDR4x内存和 阿德雷诺610作为集成图形单元。该SoC被定位在中低端市场。系统速度出乎意料地好，也很流畅，但对游戏的期望值应该降低。虽然休闲游戏对华为智能手机来说没有问题，但像PUGB或Asphalt 9这样高要求的游戏，即使减少了细节，也不一定能顺利玩下去。也就是说，Nova 9 SE在任何时候都不会太热，可以持续地挖掘其全部性能。
只要音量不过分，下巴上的扬声器就能提供体面的声音体验。如果有必要，有线耳机或头戴式耳机可以通过可选的适配器连接到USB端口，而蓝牙则可以通过无线方式使用。
凭借其4000毫安时的电池，Nova 9 SE在我们的Wi-Fi测试中实现了良好的运行时间，在调整屏幕亮度（150cd/m²）后超过13小时。然而，在我们的比较中，它是尾随者，因为竞争对手一贯依赖更大的能量存储。
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova 9 SE | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 | |
| Oppo A76 | |
| Samsung Galaxy M23 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (4.6 - 17, n=15) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova 9 SE | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 | |
| Oppo A76 | |
| Samsung Galaxy M23 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (5.1 - 9.8, n=15) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova 9 SE | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 | |
| Oppo A76 | |
| Samsung Galaxy M23 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (2.7 - 11, n=15) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova 9 SE | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 | |
| Oppo A76 | |
| Samsung Galaxy M23 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (1.4 - 3.3, n=15) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei Nova 9 SE | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 | Oppo A76 | Samsung Galaxy M23 | Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -12% | -2% | -7% | -10% | 79% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 973.13 | 895.34 -8% | 980.7 1% | 867.2 -11% | 728 ? -25% | 1839 ? 89% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 714.41 | 519.23 -27% | 711.7 0% | 500.3 -30% | 527 ? -26% | 1425 ? 99% |
| Random Read 4KB | 154.28 | 172.95 12% | 174.7 13% | 187.9 22% | 191.7 ? 24% | 277 ? 80% |
| Random Write 4KB | 211.27 | 163.29 -23% | 162.7 -23% | 189.5 -10% | 185.8 ? -12% | 309 ? 46% |
温度
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
扬声器
Huawei Nova 9 SE audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (94 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| Samsung Galaxy M23 | |
| Oppo A76 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (476 - 3244, n=203, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 | |
| Huawei Nova 9 SE | |
Pros
Cons
评语。谷歌节制的良好整体包装
华为通过Nova 9 SE提供了一款吸引人的中端智能手机，其良好的主摄像头、持久的电池、准确的显示屏和非凡的色彩，特别令人信服。
华为Nova 9 SE是一款很好的智能手机，但它仍然必须没有谷歌服务
然而，这款华为智能手机也不得不忍受一些批评。面板本来可以更亮一些，并且有更高的对比度。此外，5G、DRM认证和谷歌移动服务（GMS）都没有提供。
华为在主摄像头上做对了很多事情，但额外的镜头并不真正令人信服。此外，视频录制只限于全高清30帧。
Nova 9 SE的强大替代品是 Galaxy M23和 Redmi Note 11.
价格和可用性
华为Nova 9 SE可以直接从华为在线商店以311欧元的价格购买。并经常在那里提供实物折扣，如免费耳机和其他配件。这款智能手机也可以在亚马逊以更便宜的价格提供。
Huawei Nova 9 SE
- 06/17/2022 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Price comparison
