Notebookcheck Logo
Teaser

惠普 OmniStudio X 32 评论--适合办公室、在家办公或学校使用的完美 AI 一体机?

全面的解决方案

作为一款功能强大的一体式人工智能电脑,惠普 OmniStudio X 32 承诺将性能、设计和功能完美结合。无论是用于工作、学习还是创意项目,我们都测试了这款 32 英寸的智能设备到底有多出色,是否符合其全能型多面手的定位。
Sebastian Bade, 👁 Sebastian Bade (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Desktop Intel Meteor Lake Nvidia Geforce Workstation

结论 - 惠普 OmniStudio X 32 向杂乱电缆宣战

惠普 OmniStudio X 32 是一款功能强大的一体机系统,特别适合创意任务。它采用英特尔酷睿 7 155H 和 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑,可为图像和视频编辑以及人工智能任务提供稳定的性能。其高分辨率 4K 屏幕可清晰显示内容,并拥有较高的色彩空间覆盖率,但在照明方面存在不足。电脑的冷却系统工作高效,将温度控制在极限范围内,并确保背景噪音水平适中。

它的存储和内存配置包括快速的 2 TB SSD 和 32 GB DDR5 内存,足以满足需求,但在升级选项方面却受到了严重限制。它的性能只能满足部分游戏需求,因为 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑很快就达到了极限。缺少 144 Hz 面板,这对某些用户来说可能是个不利因素。总之,OmniStudio X 32 提供了一个经过深思熟虑的整体方案,尤其对专业创作人员来说是一个有趣的选择,并能保持工作空间的整洁。

Pros

+ 显示器和电脑合二为一(一体化系统)
+ 无多余电线
+ 包括鼠标和键盘
+ Wi-Fi 7
+ 实用的软件功能和多种性能模式
+ 明亮的 4K 显示屏,色彩准确度高,无 PWM
+ 高效冷却装置

Cons

- 显示频率仅为 60 赫兹
- Wi-Fi 性能
- 几乎没有任何升级选项
- 没有维护开口
- CPU 涡轮利用率低
- GeForce 低 TDP 的 RTX 4050

价格和供应情况

您可以直接从制造商的网站上配置和订购 HP OmniStudio X 32。价格从 1,129.99 美元起。

惠普的 OmniStudio-X 系列一体机将笔记本电脑硬件与大显示屏结合在一起。其节俭的组件可为各种应用提供足够的性能。惠普提供 27 英寸和 32 英寸两种机型。配备英特尔酷睿 Ultra 5 处理器、16 GB 内存和 512 GB 固态硬盘的 27 英寸机型价格约为 1100 美元,而配备 32 GB 内存、2 TB 固态硬盘和GeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑的 32 英寸机型价格约为 2000 美元。

可能的替代品比较

HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
Processor
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H 16 x 3.8 - 4.8 GHz, 64 W PL2 / Short Burst, 35 W PL1 / Sustained, Meteor Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU - 6 GB VRAM, Core: 1605 MHz, RAM: 2000 MHz, Nvidia 572.70
Memory
32 GB 
, DDR5 5,600 MT/s
Display
32.00 inch 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 138 PPI, HPN406F, IPS, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH
Storage
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006, 2048 GB 
, 1900 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
5 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort
Networking
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 5655 x 714.8 x 200
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Primary Camera: 5 MPix
Additional features
12 Months Warranty
Weight
9.56 kg
Price
2099 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳和连接

惠普 OmniStudio X 集纤薄设计和强大功能于一身。其优雅的外壳将显示器、扬声器和电脑硬件巧妙地融为一体。附带流星银配色的无线键盘和鼠标。

支架上有三个 USB 端口,背面还有三个 USB 端口,所有这些端口都可以轻松接入。两个 HDMI 端口,包括一个 HDMI-in 连接,可用作外接显示器。英特尔 Wi-Fi 7 可用于无线连接,也可使用 2.5 Gbit/s RJ45 连接。有关维护工作,请参阅HP 的支持视频。.

HP OmniStudio X
HP OmniStudio X
HP OmniStudio X
HP OmniStudio X
HP OmniStudio X
HP OmniStudio X
HP OmniStudio X
带键盘和鼠标的 HP OmniStudio X
HP OmniStudio X 的支架
HP OmniStudio X 的支架
HP OmniStudio X 上的摄像头模块
HP OmniStudio X 的外部端口(来源:HP)
HP OmniStudio X 的外部端口(来源:HP)
Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
  (469 - 1642, n=21)
1171 MBit/s +57%
Minisforum AI X1 Pro
Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card
967 (917min - 1020max) MBit/s +30%
Minisforum AtomMan G7 Ti
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
960 (904min - 987max) MBit/s +29%
Average of class Desktop
  (744 - 835, n=2, last 2 years)
790 MBit/s +6%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
744 (384min - 781max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
  (838 - 1701, n=21)
1336 MBit/s +47%
Average of class Desktop
  (801 - 1478, n=3, last 2 years)
1062 MBit/s +17%
Minisforum AI X1 Pro
Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card
973 (491min - 984max) MBit/s +7%
Minisforum AtomMan G7 Ti
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
947 (869min - 970max) MBit/s +5%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
906 (475min - 950max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Minisforum AI X1 Pro
Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card
1787 (1743min - 1853max) MBit/s +61%
Minisforum AtomMan G7 Ti
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1653 (825min - 1704max) MBit/s +49%
Average of class Desktop
  (1111 - 1734, n=3, last 2 years)
1482 MBit/s +33%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
  (943 - 1653, n=16)
1373 MBit/s +24%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1111 (982min - 1218max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Minisforum AI X1 Pro
Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card
1806 (1779min - 1816max) MBit/s +149%
Minisforum AtomMan G7 Ti
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1702 (843min - 1731max) MBit/s +135%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
  (725 - 1770, n=16)
1487 MBit/s +105%
Average of class Desktop
  (725 - 1751, n=2, last 2 years)
1238 MBit/s +71%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
725 (394min - 1017max) MBit/s
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200Tooltip
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1111 (982-1218)
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø725 (394-1017)
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø731 (384-781)
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø889 (475-950)

网络摄像头

保利摄像机专业版
保利摄像机专业版

HP OmniStudio X 有一个可伸缩的 500 万像素摄像头,在光线不足的条件下会很快失焦。随附的 Poly Camera Pro 软件可让您使用预定义的配置文件轻松定制摄像头。它还具有模糊滤镜和跟踪模式,可自动保持面部对焦。

ColorChecker
9.2 ∆E
8 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
14 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
13 ∆E
21.5 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
ColorChecker HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng: 11.27 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 21.45 ∆E

可持续性

惠普 OmniStudio X 设备符合 EPEAT 和能源之星的要求,并已获得这些认证。惠普还使用海洋塑料(OBP)和回收的消费后塑料,这对环境很有好处。我们还不得不称赞惠普的包装,它完全不使用任何塑料。

输入设备 - 包括鼠标和键盘

惠普 OmniStudio X 配备了流星银配色的时尚键盘和鼠标组合。两款设备均可无线连接,键盘因其良好的键入手感和数字键盘而得分。鼠标的边缘锋利,不太符合人体工程学。缺少键盘背光也是一个小缺点。

电脑随附一个鼠标和一个键盘
电脑随附一个鼠标和一个键盘

显示屏 - 4K IPS,仅 60 赫兹

子像素阵列
子像素阵列
轻微背光出血
轻微背光出血

惠普为 OmniStudio X 32 配备了高分辨率 4K 显示屏(3840 x 2160 像素),屏幕比例为 16:9。该面板在照明不均匀方面略显不足,尤其是在显示暗色背景时。我们无法检测到 PWM 闪烁,因此比较容易看清。在我们的测试中,其最大亮度平均为 488 cd/m²,略低于制造商的规格要求。

由于黑阶增加,对比度略受负面影响。该面板没有进行出厂校准,这反映在 Delta-E-2000 值的增加上。无论使用哪种色彩配置文件,色彩偏差都很明显,只有通过手动校准才能显著减少偏差。

总的来说,该显示器的画质不错,色彩空间覆盖率高,适合专业照片和视频编辑。但缺少 144 Hz 选项,这将进一步提升该设备的性能,并突出其专业性。

480
cd/m²
495
cd/m²
498
cd/m²
462
cd/m²
522
cd/m²
480
cd/m²
460
cd/m²
507
cd/m²
491
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
HPN406F tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 522 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 488.3 cd/m² Minimum: 41 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Contrast: 1338:1 (Black: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.76 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.88, calibrated: 0.89
ΔE Greyscale 5.42 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
85.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
89.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.49
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
HPN406F, IPS, 3840x2160, 32", 60 Hz
KTC KTC G42P5 OLED
3840x2160, 42",  Hz
AOC CU34G2XPD
VA , WLED, 3440x1440, 34", 180 Hz
Philips Evnia 34M2C8600
QD OLED, 3440x1440, 34", 175 Hz
Display
3%
-5%
6%
Display P3 Coverage
89.8
95.5
6%
82.6
-8%
98.4
10%
sRGB Coverage
100
100
0%
99.6
0%
99.9
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
85.8
88.8
3%
80.7
-6%
93.9
9%
Response Times
97%
64%
94%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
30.4 ?(16.4, 14)
0.6 ?(0.3, 0.3)
98%
11.6 ?(6, 5.6)
62%
1.4 ?(0.6, 0.8)
95%
Response Time Black / White *
20 ?(11.6, 8.4)
1 ?(0.4, 0.6)
95%
7 ?(5, 2)
65%
1.4 ?(0.6, 0.8)
93%
PWM Frequency
60
175
Screen
4739%
-14%
6%
Brightness middle
522
448
-14%
194
-63%
231
-56%
Brightness
488
177
-64%
210
-57%
Brightness Distribution
88
86
-2%
85
-3%
Black Level *
0.39
0.001
100%
0.05
87%
0.1
74%
Contrast
1338
448000
33383%
3880
190%
2310
73%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.76
4.08
-9%
2.46
35%
2.02
46%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9.04
10.09
-12%
4.36
52%
5.12
43%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.89
3.3
-271%
3.67
-312%
2.02
-127%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.42
5.63
-4%
8.02
-48%
2.11
61%
Gamma
2.49 88%
2.38 92%
2.4 92%
2.49 88%
CCT
7521 86%
7094 92%
6394 102%
6229 104%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
1613% / 2781%
15% / -1%
35% / 19%

* ... smaller is better

使用 sRGB 色彩配置文件的测量结果

灰度
灰度
颜色检查器
颜色检查器
饱和度
饱和度
灰度校准
灰度校准
色彩校验仪已校准
色彩校验仪已校准
饱和度校准
饱和度校准

使用 P3 色彩曲线的测量结果

灰度
灰度
颜色检查器
颜色检查器
饱和度
饱和度
灰度校准
灰度校准
色彩校验仪已校准
色彩校验仪已校准
饱和度校准
饱和度校准

色彩空间覆盖率

sRGB
sRGB
AdobeRGB
AdobeRGB
DCI-P3
DCI-P3

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.6 ms rise
↘ 8.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.4 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8560 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

0 % 亮度
0 % 亮度
25 % 亮度
25 % 亮度
50 % 亮度
50 % 亮度
亮度 75
亮度 75
亮度为 100
亮度为 100

性能 - 配备 16 个内核的英特尔酷睿 Ultra 7 处理器

惠普 OmniStudio X 配备了英特尔酷睿 Ultra 7 155H,因此具有良好的计算能力、高效的多任务处理能力和现代人工智能功能。这样的组合对要求苛刻的用户特别有吸引力。安装了 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑,用于 3D 计算。如果省略专用 GPU,惠普 OmniStudio X 的价格略低。

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z (iGPU)
GPU-Z (dGPU)
GPU-Z (dGPU)
HWiNFO

测试条件

可通过 myHP 应用程序选择多种电源模式。我们使用性能模式进行了所有性能测试。使用该电源配置文件,NvidiaGeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑的运行功耗可达 60 瓦。在平衡模式下,专用显卡的功耗降至 35 瓦。

HP OmniStudio X 的不同性能模式
HP OmniStudio X 的不同性能模式

处理器

英特尔 英特尔酷睿 7 155HHP OmniStudio X 内置的英特尔酷睿 Ultra 7 155H 处理器拥有 16 个内核和 22 个线程,可为创意应用程序提供足够的性能。该处理器的时钟频率高达 4.8 GHz,性能符合我们的平均测试结果。在基准测试中,无论是单核还是多核任务,它都取得了不错的成绩,但无法与 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS 的性能相提并论。

电源模式 Cinebench R15 1T Cinebench R15 nT Cinebench R20 1T Cinebench R20 nT Cinebench R23 1T Cinebench R23 nT
省电型 206 2,140 576 4,705 1,362 13,318
平衡 238 2,378 653 5,505 1,708 14,199
绩效 246 2,652 674 5,710 1,722 16,119
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
 
89.8 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
 
82.8 pt
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
82.7 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
 
76.5 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
 
69.2 pt
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
 
69.2 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (14895 - 18037, n=12)
16150 Points 0%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
16119 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (9769 - 19007, n=52)
14965 Points -7%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (9709 - 15100, n=19)
13307 Points -17%
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
  (9194 - 14564, n=6)
12308 Points -24%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (6508 - 14088, n=48)
11650 Points -28%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (1623 - 1783, n=12)
1749 Points +2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1496 - 1815, n=52)
1726 Points 0%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1722 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
  (1549 - 1735, n=6)
1668 Points -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (1516 - 1616, n=19)
1565 Points -9%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1386 - 1522, n=45)
1497 Points -13%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (5808 - 7026, n=12)
6307 Points +10%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (3798 - 7409, n=50)
5795 Points +1%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5710 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (3742 - 5813, n=19)
5162 Points -10%
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
  (3673 - 5618, n=6)
4766 Points -17%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (2498 - 5408, n=50)
4459 Points -22%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (673 - 698, n=12)
685 Points +2%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
674 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (601 - 696, n=50)
665 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
  (622 - 664, n=6)
643 Points -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (595 - 631, n=19)
610 Points -9%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (520 - 586, n=47)
576 Points -15%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2652 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (2342 - 2908, n=12)
2558 Points -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1932 - 2880, n=56)
2449 Points -8%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (1588 - 2411, n=19)
2163 Points -18%
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
  (1700 - 2245, n=6)
1983 Points -25%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1342 - 2173, n=50)
1894 Points -29%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (269 - 283, n=12)
276 Points +12%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (241 - 261, n=19)
250 Points +2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (99.6 - 268, n=52)
249 Points +1%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
246 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
  (235 - 251, n=6)
244 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (201 - 231, n=46)
225 Points -9%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (62669 - 74664, n=12)
68159 MIPS +5%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
64627 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (49526 - 65336, n=20)
60091 MIPS -7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (41739 - 70254, n=50)
59108 MIPS -9%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (33718 - 56758, n=46)
48384 MIPS -25%
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
  (0 - 0, n=2)
0 MIPS -100%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (5197 - 6714, n=12)
6297 MIPS +24%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (5090 - 6070, n=20)
5799 MIPS +14%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (5138 - 5732, n=46)
5492 MIPS +8%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (4594 - 5621, n=50)
5330 MIPS +5%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5092 MIPS
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
  (4663 - 5136, n=6)
4948 MIPS -3%
Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (11073 - 14014, n=16)
12808 Points 0%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12761 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (7732 - 13656, n=55)
12275 Points -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
  (11087 - 11749, n=6)
11404 Points -11%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (n=1)
10340 Points -19%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (8860 - 9647, n=2)
9254 Points -27%
Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (2510 - 2698, n=14)
2619 Points +10%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2379 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1901 - 2473, n=52)
2377 Points 0%
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
  (2199 - 2316, n=6)
2277 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (2165 - 2220, n=2)
2193 Points -8%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (n=1)
2148 Points -10%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12626 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (10017 - 13556, n=52)
12016 Points -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (11256 - 12726, n=13)
11864 Points -6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
  (9696 - 10856, n=6)
10408 Points -18%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (8313 - 10490, n=21)
9642 Points -24%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (4655 - 9851, n=40)
8551 Points -32%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (1765 - 2004, n=13)
1926 Points +10%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1755 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1462 - 1824, n=52)
1751 Points 0%
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
  (1593 - 1699, n=6)
1660 Points -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (1523 - 1652, n=21)
1589 Points -9%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1429 - 1625, n=40)
1561 Points -11%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (18.6 - 22.7, n=12)
20 fps +8%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
18.6 fps
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (12.6 - 18.7, n=20)
16.7 fps -10%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (9.93 - 21.2, n=50)
16.5 fps -11%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (7.38 - 17.4, n=46)
13.8 fps -26%
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
  (9.7 - 16.7, n=6)
13.4 fps -28%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
79.2 s *
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
  (42.7 - 70.9, n=6)
53.4 s * +33%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (44.8 - 81.7, n=20)
53.1 s * +33%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (44.4 - 77, n=12)
50.7 s * +36%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (37.5 - 79.2, n=49)
49.6 s * +37%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (38.6 - 59.9, n=45)
46.5 s * +41%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (0.548 - 0.615, n=46)
0.566 sec * -15%
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
  (0.4898 - 0.53, n=6)
0.506 sec * -3%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.4909 sec *
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (0.4627 - 0.4974, n=20)
0.483 sec * +2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (0.4457 - 0.53, n=49)
0.4817 sec * +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (0.4304 - 0.4935, n=12)
0.4517 sec * +8%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

0135270405540675810945108012151350148516201755189020252160229524302565Tooltip
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng: Ø2119 (1766.55-2635.05)
Cinebench R15 循环期间的 CPU 指标
Cinebench R15 循环期间的 CPU 指标
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
9411
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
6855 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
86502 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
13079 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6828
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
58858
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit
2.61 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit
27.91 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 32Bit
125.12 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
3.02 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
31.32 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
122.73 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
246 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2652 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
172.44 fps
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
674 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5710 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
16119 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1722 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
856 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
 
96 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
 
77.7 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
 
68.4 pt
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
63.8 pt
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
 
62.2 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
 
59.4 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (23708 - 29544, n=12)
25871 KRay/s +111%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (10950 - 17963, n=20)
15327 KRay/s +25%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (8772 - 15961, n=20)
13481 KRay/s +10%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (6670 - 18470, n=50)
13121 KRay/s +7%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
12248 KRay/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
  (8430 - 13639, n=6)
10907 KRay/s -11%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (99659 - 125873, n=12)
109375 Points +68%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (71414 - 110797, n=20)
96546 Points +48%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (40905 - 93181, n=50)
69689 Points +7%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
65152 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (39404 - 65636, n=20)
57444 Points -12%
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
  (43652 - 70880, n=6)
57140 Points -12%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (4332 - 5180, n=12)
4712 MB/s +58%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (2599 - 4439, n=20)
3855 MB/s +29%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (2471 - 3804, n=20)
3301 MB/s +11%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1940 - 4436, n=50)
3249 MB/s +9%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
2982 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
  (2047 - 3404, n=6)
2752 MB/s -8%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (109458 - 124695, n=12)
116267 Points +52%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (84185 - 107544, n=20)
100656 Points +32%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (85233 - 91941, n=20)
90603 Points +18%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (64698 - 94181, n=50)
83035 Points +9%
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
  (77892 - 79986, n=6)
78805 Points +3%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
76512 Points
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (14062 - 15519, n=12)
14886 Points +66%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (10970 - 13205, n=20)
12630 Points +41%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (6420 - 9792, n=20)
9145 Points +2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (5639 - 10647, n=50)
9134 Points +2%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
8967 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
  (6588 - 7851, n=6)
7398 Points -17%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (53436 - 67367, n=12)
58411 Points +84%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (39164 - 61370, n=20)
52842 Points +67%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (23365 - 39464, n=20)
34552 Points +9%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (18236 - 47685, n=50)
33893 Points +7%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
31697 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
  (21210 - 35321, n=6)
27928 Points -12%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (74617 - 149388, n=20)
123317 MB/s +93%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (54613 - 142360, n=20)
115891 MB/s +81%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (64515 - 172642, n=12)
94293 MB/s +47%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (45713 - 152179, n=50)
77255 MB/s +21%
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
  (45524 - 108402, n=6)
64990 MB/s +2%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
63988 MB/s
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (627 - 1080, n=12)
986 MB/s +10%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (557 - 1250, n=50)
962 MB/s +7%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
897 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
  (594 - 994, n=6)
806 MB/s -10%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (578 - 911, n=20)
803 MB/s -10%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (461 - 830, n=43)
358 (461min - 830max) MB/s -60%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (12361 - 15911, n=12)
13762 KRay/s +113%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (5798 - 9540, n=20)
8175 KRay/s +26%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (4545 - 8717, n=21)
7332 KRay/s +13%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (3569 - 9802, n=50)
6871 KRay/s +6%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
6471 KRay/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
  (4345 - 7221, n=6)
5677 KRay/s -12%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
  (45724 - 49844, n=6)
47064 MPixel/s +3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (32719 - 54223, n=50)
46707 MPixel/s +2%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
45798 MPixel/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (33192 - 41668, n=12)
39121 MPixel/s -15%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (26873 - 30604, n=20)
29389 MPixel/s -36%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (11898 - 26757, n=21)
22376 MPixel/s -51%

系统性能

惠普 OmniStudio X 一体机提供强大的系统性能,足以满足创意和生产应用的需要。英特尔酷睿 7 155H 和 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑的组合具有足够的储备,即使是耗电的任务也能应付自如。得益于其 4K 显示屏,它是图像和视频编辑的理想之选。总之,它是一款功能强大的一体化系统,适合专业用户使用。

PCMark 10 / Score
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (7120 - 8822, n=13)
7644 Points +10%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
6956 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (6251 - 7669, n=21)
6900 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (6537 - 6973, n=5)
6825 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (4809 - 7761, n=51)
6768 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (4960 - 7470, n=40)
6627 Points -5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
  (6194 - 6463, n=7)
6337 Points -9%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (9936 - 11570, n=13)
10785 Points +14%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (7605 - 11289, n=51)
10327 Points +9%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (9374 - 11323, n=21)
10250 Points +8%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (9463 - 10446, n=5)
10145 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (8472 - 11064, n=40)
10053 Points +6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
  (9184 - 10697, n=7)
10036 Points +6%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
9463 Points
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (9631 - 14612, n=13)
10479 Points +15%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (7704 - 10210, n=21)
9288 Points +2%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
9088 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (8769 - 9272, n=5)
9071 Points 0%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (6042 - 10591, n=51)
8760 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (6562 - 9803, n=40)
8700 Points -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
  (7042 - 8538, n=7)
7812 Points -14%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (9009 - 13528, n=13)
10842 Points +2%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
10622 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (6920 - 11572, n=21)
9438 Points -11%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (8602 - 10622, n=5)
9407 Points -11%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (4985 - 13035, n=51)
9367 Points -12%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (5081 - 11323, n=40)
9103 Points -14%
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
  (8198 - 9506, n=7)
8841 Points -17%
CrossMark / Overall
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (1531 - 1939, n=11)
1768 Points +5%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
1685 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1366 - 1903, n=50)
1663 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (1552 - 1740, n=5)
1648 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (1476 - 1743, n=16)
1621 Points -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
  (1522 - 1633, n=5)
1574 Points -7%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1367 - 1683, n=9)
1551 Points -8%
CrossMark / Productivity
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (1488 - 1872, n=11)
1698 Points +9%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (1451 - 1738, n=16)
1600 Points +3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1291 - 1798, n=49)
1584 Points +2%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
1557 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (1459 - 1659, n=5)
1555 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1389 - 1660, n=9)
1545 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
  (1432 - 1594, n=5)
1510 Points -3%
CrossMark / Creativity
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
1943 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (1683 - 2102, n=11)
1923 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (1811 - 1943, n=5)
1885 Points -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1519 - 2014, n=49)
1837 Points -5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
  (1683 - 1765, n=5)
1729 Points -11%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (1632 - 1867, n=16)
1724 Points -11%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1430 - 1728, n=9)
1620 Points -17%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (1255 - 1849, n=11)
1552 Points +12%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (939 - 1802, n=49)
1405 Points +1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (1060 - 1715, n=16)
1405 Points +1%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
1391 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1038 - 1633, n=9)
1386 Points 0%
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
  (1171 - 1520, n=5)
1350 Points -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (1167 - 1467, n=5)
1315 Points -5%
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (275 - 334, n=12)
304 Points +16%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (248 - 304, n=17)
280 Points +7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (213 - 299, n=50)
277 Points +6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (262 - 285, n=5)
277 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (251 - 280, n=40)
264 Points +1%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
262 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
  (245 - 263, n=6)
255 Points -3%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (247 - 260, n=5)
255 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (176.4 - 314, n=11)
254 Points +3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (166.4 - 309, n=45)
252 Points +2%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
247 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
  (227 - 240, n=5)
233 Points -6%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (200 - 233, n=15)
222 Points -10%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (211 - 218, n=3)
214 Points -13%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (600 - 690, n=45)
642 ms * -14%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (564 - 607, n=18)
588 ms * -5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
  (560 - 595, n=6)
575 ms * -2%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
561 ms *
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (416 - 642, n=50)
541 ms * +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (496 - 664, n=12)
534 ms * +5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (416 - 561, n=5)
512 ms * +9%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
6956 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (62397 - 96791, n=50)
82943 MB/s +15%
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
  (67482 - 87473, n=6)
77947 MB/s +8%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
72201 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (61459 - 71873, n=12)
67518 MB/s -6%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (47938 - 53345, n=20)
50405 MB/s -30%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (24508 - 48144, n=21)
42778 MB/s -41%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (60544 - 90647, n=50)
79969 MB/s +3%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
77365 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
  (70520 - 76803, n=6)
74300 MB/s -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (49866 - 61976, n=12)
58471 MB/s -24%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (43892 - 53321, n=20)
51062 MB/s -34%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (25882 - 50365, n=20)
45259 MB/s -41%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (68425 - 93239, n=12)
85746 MB/s +19%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (58692 - 93451, n=50)
72670 MB/s +1%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
72057 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
  (63162 - 72443, n=6)
70040 MB/s -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (51085 - 57202, n=20)
55188 MB/s -23%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (22240 - 46214, n=20)
42489 MB/s -41%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
168 ns *
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
  (127.3 - 184.8, n=6)
145.5 ns * +13%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (116.2 - 233, n=50)
143.2 ns * +15%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (82.5 - 117, n=12)
97 ns * +42%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (80.7 - 120.6, n=20)
88.7 ns * +47%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (71.9 - 104.1, n=44)
43.3 (71.9min - 104.1max) ns * +74%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

在 DPC 延迟测试中,惠普 OmniStudio X 既没有显示出严重的缺陷,也没有显示出突出的数值。我们在使用 Edge 浏览器上网时测得的延迟值最高。在播放 4K 视频时,我们发现在整个播放过程中偶尔会出现明显的丢帧现象。

打开多个浏览器标签页时的最大延迟
打开多个浏览器标签页时的最大延迟
播放 4K 视频时的最大延迟
播放 4K 视频时的最大延迟
Prime95 十秒后的最大延迟时间
Prime95 十秒后的最大延迟时间
按最长执行时间排列的驱动程序
按最长执行时间排列的驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Minisforum AI X1 Pro
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
12282 μs * -876%
Geekom AX8 Pro
Radeon 780M, R9 8945H, Acer N7000 2 TB
1856 μs * -48%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
1258 μs *
Geekom GT1 Mega
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
1145.7 μs * +9%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

惠普 OmniStudio X 使用西部数据公司生产的 2TB SSD。尽管机箱宽敞,但只能安装一个大容量存储设备,这大大限制了它的扩展选择。M.2 固态硬盘的冷却效率很高,即使在连续负载的情况下也不会降低性能。

AS 固态硬盘
AS 固态硬盘
CDM 3
CDM 3
CDM 5
CDM 5
CDM 6
CDM 6
CDI
CDI
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
Sequential Read: 3078 MB/s
Sequential Write: 3581 MB/s
512K Read: 554.5 MB/s
512K Write: 2579 MB/s
4K Read: 70.82 MB/s
4K Write: 141.8 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 586.6 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 469.7 MB/s

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

03006009001200150018002100240027003000330036003900420045004800510054005700Tooltip
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5934 (4214.19-5967.88)

图形卡

惠普 OmniStudio X 的顶级配置使用了 英伟达GeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑显然优于 英特尔酷睿 7 155H的 iGPU。由于性能范围有限,它在我们的测试中落后于同类系统,但在图像编辑、人工智能任务和游戏中表现出了更好的性能。它拥有 6GB 的 VRAM,适合休闲游戏,而老游戏则可以 4K 格式运行。现代游戏通常只能以降低细节的全高清分辨率运行。

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Desktop
 
100 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
 
43 pt
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
39.4 pt
Average AMD Radeon 890M
 
20 pt
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
 
16.8 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Desktop
  (3347 - 130697, n=19, last 2 years)
80669 Points +198%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (13339 - 32642, n=40)
28555 Points +5%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
27086 Points
Average AMD Radeon 890M
  (13267 - 16800, n=11)
15200 Points -44%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (8064 - 13716, n=37)
11843 Points -56%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Desktop
  (13814 - 401257, n=11, last 2 years)
188808 Points +96%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (51138 - 161152, n=26)
125255 Points +30%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
96214 Points
Average AMD Radeon 890M
  (50120 - 58319, n=10)
54274 Points -44%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (31876 - 52200, n=24)
42661 Points -56%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Desktop
  (2277 - 108886, n=26, last 2 years)
59559 Points +209%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (13591 - 24007, n=38)
21072 Points +9%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
19296 Points
Average AMD Radeon 890M
  (8188 - 10037, n=11)
9163 Points -53%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (5568 - 9692, n=41)
8226 Points -57%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Desktop
  (636 - 49144, n=28, last 2 years)
28502 Points +289%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (5107 - 9040, n=38)
7787 Points +6%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
7329 Points
Average AMD Radeon 890M
  (3144 - 3676, n=12)
3484 Points -52%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (2018 - 3770, n=44)
3213 Points -56%
Unigine Superposition
1280x720 720p Low
Average of class Desktop
  (4614 - 63947, n=11, last 2 years)
43963 Points +64%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
26742 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (n=1)
26742 Points 0%
Average AMD Radeon 890M
  (12737 - 13973, n=2)
13355 Points -50%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (10102 - 12451, n=5)
11384 Points -57%
1920x1080 1080p High
Average of class Desktop
  (924 - 57435, n=10, last 2 years)
28966 Points +203%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
9548 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (n=1)
9548 Points 0%
Average AMD Radeon 890M
  (3976 - 4366, n=2)
4171 Points -56%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (3341 - 3948, n=5)
3674 Points -62%
3DMark 05 Standard
46696 points
3DMark 06 Standard Score
41211 points
3DMark Vantage P Result
70238 points
3DMark 11 Performance
25224 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
85052 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
47951 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
17640 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
8862 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
7762 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Score
1669 points
Help
Blender
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (47 - 175, n=39)
56.1 Seconds * -4%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
54 Seconds *
Average of class Desktop
  (8 - 54, n=25, last 2 years)
15.2 Seconds * +72%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (294 - 692, n=40)
431 Seconds * -16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (243 - 907, n=39)
392 Seconds * -6%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (300 - 664, n=59)
375 Seconds * -1%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
371 Seconds *
Average AMD Radeon 890M
  (221 - 306, n=10)
258 Seconds * +30%
Average of class Desktop
  (113 - 371, n=13, last 2 years)
209 Seconds * +44%

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Desktop
 
100 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
 
42.8 pt
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
38.9 pt
Average AMD Radeon 890M
 
19.1 pt
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
 
14.9 pt
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Average of class Desktop
  (53.9 - 246, n=21, last 2 years)
178.8 fps +232%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
53.9 (44.7min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (35.8 - 67.3, n=8)
51.4 fps -5%
Average AMD Radeon 890M
  (23.1 - 28.4, n=13)
25.9 fps -52%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (13 - 24.7, n=25)
20.2 fps -63%
Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Average of class Desktop
  (51.1 - 343, n=17, last 2 years)
245 fps +379%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (48.3 - 81.3, n=9)
64.3 fps +26%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
51.1 (37.5min, 39.1P0.1, 45.3P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon 890M
  (24 - 31.1, n=12)
28.1 fps -45%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (14.2 - 26.2, n=23)
21.4 fps -58%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Desktop
  (9.61 - 170.7, n=15, last 2 years)
135.4 fps +54%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
88.2 (18.9min, 58.8P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (14.9 - 101.7, n=33)
81.6 fps -7%
Average AMD Radeon 890M
  (30.3 - 33.3, n=13)
31.9 fps -64%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (9.59 - 20.6, n=36)
14.7 fps -83%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Desktop
  (7.97 - 237, n=18, last 2 years)
188 fps +157%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (15.5 - 122.3, n=38)
76.2 fps +4%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
73.1 fps
Average AMD Radeon 890M
  (26.6 - 34.4, n=11)
31.6 fps -57%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (14.7 - 31.7, n=43)
24.7 fps -66%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Desktop
  (12 - 616, n=14, last 2 years)
421 fps +239%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (21.2 - 156.6, n=37)
134 fps +8%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
124.1 (23.6min, 95.3P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon 890M
  (49.8 - 59.7, n=11)
55.3 fps -55%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (27.1 - 58.9, n=39)
44.7 fps -64%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average of class Desktop
  (121.2 - 292, n=17, last 2 years)
224 fps +85%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (73.5 - 175.6, n=38)
131.7 fps +9%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
121.2 (105.3min) fps
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (35.2 - 80.9, n=43)
67 fps -45%
Average AMD Radeon 890M
  (32.4 - 89.8, n=13)
59.6 fps -51%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Desktop
  (20.8 - 197, n=27, last 2 years)
142.4 fps +139%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (59.6 - 117, n=39)
92 fps +54%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
59.6 fps
Average AMD Radeon 890M
  (42.2 - 53.3, n=12)
47.4 fps -20%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (27.9 - 43.9, n=44)
34.9 fps -41%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Desktop
  (7.8 - 369, n=27, last 2 years)
243 fps +226%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (18.5 - 94.7, n=40)
75.4 fps +1%
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
74.5 (53.4min, 58.2P0.1, 61.9P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon 890M
  (31 - 34, n=4)
32.5 fps -56%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (14.5 - 43.1, n=31)
23.7 fps -68%

FPS diagram - 30 minutes of Cyberpunk 2077 1920 x 1080 Ultra preset (FSR off)

05101520253035404550Tooltip
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU: Ø49.9 (47.5-50.4)
Geekom GT1 Mega Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core: Ø22.1 (18.6-24)
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M: Ø27 (25.5-27.4)
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
GTA V (2015) 173.4 168.4 151.5 88.2 62.6 56.8
The Witcher 3 (2015) 328 239 144.7 74.5 52.7 41.7
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 148.7 136.1 130.3 121.2 92.4
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 155.8 101.7 73.1 52.3 29.8
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 78.9 73.2 59.6 51
Strange Brigade (2018) 377 174.2 141.7 124.1 83.4 44.4
Anno 1800 (2019) 104.8 94.5 79 48.6 45.1 31
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 91.8 61.4 52.8 51.1 35.3 19.5
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) 94.6 74.4 62.8 53.9 30.8 12.7
Total War Pharaoh (2023) 259.8 171.6 102.8 80 55.1 27.1
F1 24 (2024) 181.9 169.1 135.2 40.7 24.7 10.1
Monster Hunter Wilds (2025) 54.7 45.5 4

排放与能源

噪音排放

尽管风扇发出的噪音很小,但电脑的工作噪音仍然很低,幸好其频率很低,几乎不会令人感到烦躁。在压力测试中,性能模式下的声压级达到 37.5 dB(A),而在静音模式下最高降至 34 dB(A),差异显著。因此,对设备性能要求不高的用户可以放心使用静音模式。

Noise Level

Idle
32.3 / 32.4 / 32.6 dB(A)
Load
35.9 / 37.5 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.242.237.240.44141.738.22544.844.243.245.545.544.844.83137.944.337.238.439.94037.9403031.830.328.63029.2305031.34227.42833.632.731.36323.931.322.823.324.525.323.98018.826.224.724.724.721.918.810022.521.720.420.32220.922.512521.620.618.319.318.315.421.616023.220.117.416.818.817.623.220024.522.3201919.617.224.525025.222.120.620.821.39.825.231526.724.322.122.222.38.926.740026.425.524.624.125.58.826.450026.625.22222.222.28.726.663033.532.328.228.928.68.833.580033.431.327.427.427.59.333.4100028.326.222.422.323.19.728.3125022.921.31716.716.810.222.9160023.921.917.417.117.510.523.9200019.717.714.314.214.211.119.7250016.514.912.81312.911.716.5315019.818.114.414.114.612.619.8400018.516.913.913.713.91318.5500015.214.113.113.213.212.915.2630013.813.513.313.313.313.213.8800013.413.413.413.413.313.113.41000013.413.513.413.513.313.113.41250013.113.113.113.213.112.713.11600012.712.712.712.612.512.412.7SPL37.535.932.332.432.62437.5N2.321.51.51.50.52.3median 22.5median 20.6median 17.4median 16.8median 17.5median 12.4median 22.5Delta5.65.24.44.34.72.25.6hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
Minisforum AtomMan G7 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
Minisforum G7 PT
Radeon RX 7600M XT, R9 7945HX, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
Acemagic M2A
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Rayson RS1D0TSSD710 1024 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe
Noise
-17%
-4%
-11%
off / environment *
24
24.7
-3%
24.4
-2%
24.3
-1%
Idle Minimum *
32.3
34
-5%
29.3
9%
32.7
-1%
Idle Average *
32.4
34.1
-5%
29.4
9%
32.8
-1%
Idle Maximum *
32.6
34.1
-5%
29.4
10%
33.1
-2%
Load Average *
35.9
48.6
-35%
43.5
-21%
40.7
-13%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
40.8
55.2
-35%
45.5
-12%
45.8
-12%
Load Maximum *
37.5
48.3
-29%
45
-20%
53.9
-44%
Witcher 3 ultra *
49.3

* ... smaller is better

温度

在我们的测试过程中,电脑的冷却系统将其部件保持在 TDP 限制范围内,但 Turbo 模式只运行了很短的时间。SoC 的温度超过了 100 °C,但仍低于 110 °C,而在持续负载情况下,温度稳定在 80 °C。NvidiaGeForce RTX 4050 也达到了较高温度,但配置相对节俭,仅为 50 瓦。

压力测试 Prime95
压力测试 Prime95
压力测试 FurMark
压力测试 FurMark
压力测试 Prime95 和 FurMark
压力测试 Prime95 和 FurMark
压力测试中的 HP OmniStudio X(正面)
压力测试中的 HP OmniStudio X(正面)
压力测试中的 HP OmniStudio X(背面)
压力测试中的 HP OmniStudio X(背面)

发言人

集成扬声器来自 Bang & Olufsen,声音强劲有力,但在音量达到 70% 左右时开始失真。它们非常适合视频会议和音乐播放。虽然高音和中音比低音略占优势,但声音可以通过声音配置文件进行调整。在中低音量下,低音依然存在,声音饱满悦耳。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.741.735.72534.944.834.93137.64037.64028.229.228.25035.932.735.96345.225.345.28065.421.965.410082.720.982.712585.215.485.216076.517.676.520078.317.278.325074.79.874.731577.98.977.940084.58.884.5500828.78263081.28.881.280077.59.377.5100076.49.776.4125078.510.278.5160072.610.572.6200069.111.169.1250071.711.771.7315079.112.679.1400076.51376.5500079.412.979.4630075.213.275.2800074.913.174.91000072.113.172.11250070.312.770.31600067.712.467.7SPL89.42489.4N96.40.596.4median 77.5median 12.4median 77.5Delta3.32.23.326.325.821.422.12624.925.127.622.532.523.448.72655.818.860.922.167.2267019.372.317.674.217.774.319.575.31571.711.871.311.27410.574.21072.710.17210.67210.97511.374.811.671.71269.71269.612.371.112.669.61270.111.269.824.784.70.666.6median 12median 71.73.42.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ngApple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 16%, worst was 46%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

耗电量

内部电源可提供高达 280 瓦的功率。据惠普称,这是一款通过 80 Plus 白金认证的电源装置。在闲置模式和最低显示亮度下,我们仅测得 24 瓦,但在全亮度下,我们测得 66 瓦。在平均负载情况下,它的能耗需求上升到 121 瓦以下,有时峰值可达 195.2 瓦。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.95 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 24 / 62 / 66.6 Watt
Load midlight 120.7 / 195.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy

Notebookcheck 总评分

惠普 OmniStudio X 是一款功能强大的一体化系统,适用于创意任务。它配备了英特尔酷睿 7 155H 和 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑,可为图像编辑、人工智能应用和休闲游戏提供稳定的性能。该电脑的 4K 显示屏令人印象深刻,散热效果也很好。GPU 的性能限制和该设备的大容量存储没有任何扩展选项都是负面因素。

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 惠普 OmniStudio X 32 评论--适合办公室、在家办公或学校使用的完美 AI 一体机?
Sebastian Bade, 2025-03-18 (Update: 2025-03-18)