OnePlus Pad评论：优质的Android 平板电脑体验，让你的钱包更轻松。

iPad 10但有Android 。

OnePlus终于涉足Android ，这个领域正在迅速被Apple 和三星完全割据。OnePlus Pad配备了联发科Dimensity 9000系统芯片和快速、生动的144赫兹7:5显示屏，旨在通过一系列配件（包括磁性键盘和OnePlus Stylo）使自己与众不同。我们在这篇评论中探讨了OnePlus Pad的不同方面，看看它是否能成为一个值得信赖的便携式伴侣。

Vaidyanathan Subramaniam, 👁 Vaidyanathan Subramaniam (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 04/28/2023 🇺🇸 🇸🇪 ...

OnePlus Android Touchscreen Tablet

注：这是一个实时评论，将根据持续的测量和性能测试进行更新。

一加推出其首款平板电脑，即OnePlus Pad在该公司2月份的 "云11 "活动中，对许多人来说是一个意外的惊喜。只有少数几家OEM厂商每年继续投资开发新的Android 平板电脑，大多数厂商已经将这一领域让给了Apple iPads。

一加Pad采用的是联发科Dimensity 9000SoC，配备7:5 2000 x 2800 144 Hz显示屏。Pad有8GB/128GB和12GB/256GB两种版本。有几个可供选择的配件，包括磁性键盘、OnePlus Stylo和OnePlus Folio外壳。

我们有12GB LPDDR5内存和256GB UFS 3.1存储的OnePlus Pad变体。这个版本在印度的售价为39,999英镑（489美元），并有一年的保修期。

OnePlus的目标是以合理的价格提供优质的平板电脑体验。我们在本评论中评估是否确实如此。

OnePlus Pad (Pad Series)

Processor

MediaTek Dimensity 9000 8 x 1.8 - 3.1 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G710 MP10

Memory

12 GB

, LPDDR5

Display

11.61 inch 7:5, 2800 x 2000 pixel 296 PPI, Capacitive, native pen support, IPS, 10-bit, Dolby Vision, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 3.1, 233.5 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB Type-C, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Compass, Color spectrum

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 6.5 x 258 x 189.4

Battery

36.99 Wh, 9510 mAh Lithium-Polymer, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 12.4 h

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 13

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix EIS, 4K 30 fps video
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix EIS, 1080p 30 fps

Additional features

Speakers: Quad-speaker, Dolby Atmos, Keyboard: OnScreen, OnePlus Magnetic Keyboard, OnePlus Stylo, 67 W SuperVOOC Power Adapter, OxygenOS 13.1, 12 Months Warranty, Widevine CDM Security Level: L1, fanless

Weight

552 g

Price

443 Euro

Links

OnePlus homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
89.3 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2023	OnePlus Pad Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10	552 g	6.5 mm	11.61"	2800x2000
82.4 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2023	Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2	520 g	7.4 mm	11.50"	2000x1200
88.3 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2022	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730	572 g	5.7 mm	12.40"	2800x1752
88.8 % v7 ^(old)	05 / 2022	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730	726 g	5.5 mm	14.60"	2960x1848
91.8 % v7 ^(old)	11 / 2022	Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2, M2 10-Core GPU	682 g	6.4 mm	12.90"	2732x2048
84.6 % v7 ^(old)	12 / 2022	Xiaomi Redmi Pad Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2	445 g	7.05 mm	10.61"	2000x1200
88.6 % v7 ^(old)	11 / 2022	Apple iPad 10 A14, A14 Bionic GPU	477 g	7 mm	10.90"	2360x1640
83.1 % v7 ^(old)	01 / 2023	Oppo Pad Air SD 680, Adreno 610	440 g	6.9 mm	10.36"	2000x1200
91.7 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2022	Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1, M1 8-Core GPU	461 g	6.1 mm	10.90"	2360x1640

外壳：优质光滑的一体式结构

OnePlus Pad采用了全玻璃的正面，并采用了铝制一体成型的结构。一加Pad只有光环绿颜色可供选择，据该公司称，这象征着活力和生命。

在6.5毫米处，Pad感觉相当圆滑，但是三星Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra夺得了最轻薄的奖项。

然而，OnePlus Pad比三星的旗舰平板电脑要轻得多，其重量略高于半公斤。尽管整体重量减轻了，但Pad拿在手里感觉很安全、很结实。

显示屏玻璃与凸起的框架齐平，2.5D弧形圆边给了整个产品一个优雅的外观。

为了符合人体工程学，OnePlus设法将边框厚度保持在6.7毫米，同时仍提供令人印象深刻的88.14%的屏占比。该公司没有宣传任何形式的大猩猩玻璃对屏幕的保护。

总的来说，OnePlus Pad的结构是相当坚固的，我们没有发现底盘有明显的弯曲问题。

硬件：带有杜比全景声的四扬声器

Pad的极简主义也延续到端口的选择上。基本上，你在底部只有一个USB Type-C端口，可以满足所有连接需求。

OTG支持是可用的，但OnePlus并没有确切说明这里使用的USB标准。但是，如果一加11是任何东西，Pad也可能只用USB 2.0的速度。

平板电脑的左侧基本上是干净的，除了连接磁力键盘等配件的三针。在右侧，我们有一个磁性区域，用于锁住OnePlus Stylo和音量摇杆。

平板电脑的顶部和底部分别有一对扬声器。这个四扬声器设置已获得杜比全景声认证。框架上有两个麦克风--一个在Type-C端口旁边，另一个在音量摇杆附近。

后面有一个1300万像素的摄像头，放在中间以保持对称性。这种定位主要有助于拍摄风景。一个800万像素的自拍相机位于显示屏内，不显眼。

软件：OxygenOS 13.1，有三年的功能更新

OnePlus Pad预装了基于Android 13的OxygenOS 13.1，带有2023年3月5日的最新安全补丁。

OnePlus因将其代码库从原来的OxygenOS转向基于Oppo的ColorOS而受到抨击，但Pad没有附带任何臃肿的软件。唯一预装的第三方应用程序是Netflix和WPS Office。Widevine L1级认证可用于高分辨率DRM保护的流媒体。

OnePlus Pad上的OxygenOS 13.1带有几个手势，可以有效地进行多任务处理。OnePlus Pad被设计成适合更大的OnePlus生态系统，它实现了几个生活质量功能，包括与附近的OnePlus手机共享5G蜂窝数据，OTP在路上，Pad和OnePlus手机之间的自动连接和跨屏幕共享，以及通过OnePlus Connect应用程序远程控制OnePlus电视。

据OnePlus称，这些生态系统的功能将在未来几个月通过OTA更新推出。OnePlus手机的自动连接功能将不会出现在欧洲，所以这些用户每次都必须手动连接。

OnePlus承诺为Pad提供三年的功能更新和四年的安全补丁。这与OnePlus 11R相似，而不像OnePlus 11那样提供额外一年的软件支持。

通信：稳定的、高的Wi-Fi吞吐量

OnePlus Pad不支持蜂窝网络连接或最新的Wi-Fi 6E标准。然而，在使用我们的参考华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000路由器进行测试时，Pad设法在Wi-Fi 6吞吐量方面名列前茅。

Networking: iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | iperf3 receive AXE11000

Networking / iperf3 transmit AXE11000
OnePlus Pad 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	1710 (1696^min - 1724^max) MBit/s
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	959 (486^min - 977^max) MBit/s -44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Wi-Fi 6E	909 (871^min - 942^max) MBit/s -47%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Wi-Fi 6E	896 (774^min - 935^max) MBit/s -48%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (305 - 1757, n=121)	870 MBit/s -49%
Apple iPad 10 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	816 (764^min - 851^max) MBit/s -52%
Average of class Tablet (10.5 - 1710, n=82, last 2 years)	537 MBit/s -69%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	493 (433^min - 516^max) MBit/s -71%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Wi-Fi 6E	486 (175^min - 591^max) MBit/s -72%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	369 (179^min - 379^max) MBit/s -78%
Oppo Pad Air 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	357 (257^min - 376^max) MBit/s -79%

Networking / iperf3 receive AXE11000
OnePlus Pad 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	1696 (1635^min - 1722^max) MBit/s
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (234 - 1696, n=119)	834 MBit/s -51%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Wi-Fi 6E	832 (779^min - 876^max) MBit/s -51%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Wi-Fi 6E	831 (779^min - 861^max) MBit/s -51%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	769 (744^min - 780^max) MBit/s -55%
Apple iPad 10 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	741 (621^min - 759^max) MBit/s -56%
Average of class Tablet (20.1 - 1705, n=82, last 2 years)	517 MBit/s -70%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Wi-Fi 6E	442 (222^min - 528^max) MBit/s -74%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	409 (366^min - 434^max) MBit/s -76%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	367 (358^min - 370^max) MBit/s -78%
Oppo Pad Air 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	306 (289^min - 326^max) MBit/s -82%

OnePlus Pad 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1708 (1696-1724)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø909 (871-942)

OnePlus Pad 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1696 (1635-1722)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø832 (779-876)

照相机：1300万像素的传感器具有良好的色彩还原性

OnePlus Pad配备了一个1300万像素的后置摄像头和一个LED闪光灯。该相机支持EIS，并能进行高达4K 30帧的视频录制。

在我们的ColorChecker Passport测试中，在完美的照明条件下，我们看到该相机能够相当准确地再现所有颜色，平均delta E约为6.47。最大的偏差出现在叶子的绿色、蓝天和深色皮肤色调。

测试图显示，图像的分辨率很高，具有良好的锐度和清晰度。

我们将很快增加更多的样本图像和比较。

ColorChecker OnePlus Pad: 6.47 ∆E min: 1.46 - max: 10.96 ∆E

配件和保修：磁性键盘和OnePlus Stylo可供选择。

在盒子里，我们得到了一个100W的SuperVOOC充电器，它实际上是以67W的功率为平板电脑充电的，一个USB Type-A到Type-C电缆，以及通常的文书工作。

OnePlus为Pad提供了一系列的配件。我们的评测单元捆绑了一个磁力键盘和OnePlus Stylo笔，这两样东西是单独购买的。

根据OnePlus的说法，磁力键盘将使你花费7,999英镑（98美元），而Stylo笔将再花费4,999英镑（61美元）。不含键盘的对开式保护套价格为1,499英镑（18美元）。

今天预购Pad的人可以免费获得80W的SuperVOOC适配器和折叠式保护套。

OnePlus Pad和配件在印度享有一年的有限保修。

显示


440 cd/m²	469 cd/m²	425 cd/m²
445 cd/m²	474 cd/m²	423 cd/m²
459 cd/m²	465 cd/m²	427 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Basic Pro 3

Maximum: 474 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 447.4 cd/m² Minimum: 2.94 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 474 cd/m²
Contrast: 1481:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.16 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.09

	OnePlus Pad IPS, 2800x2000, 11.6"	Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) IPS, 2000x1200, 11.5"	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Super AMOLED, 2800x1752, 12.4"	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Super AMOLED, 2960x1848, 14.6"	Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Liquid Retina XDR Display, Mini-LED, 2732x2048, 12.9"	Xiaomi Redmi Pad IPS, 2000x1200, 10.6"	Apple iPad 10 Liquid Retina, IPS, 2360x1640, 10.9"	Oppo Pad Air IPS, 2000x1200, 10.4"	Apple iPad Air 5 2022 IPS, 2360x1640, 10.9"
Response Times		-65%	165%	168%	3462%	-52%	-60%	-71%	-46%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	23.46 ?(10.9, 12.56)	39.8 ?(19.1, 20.7) -70%	1.383 ?(0.7095, 0.6735) 94%	1.495 ?(0.7725, 0.772) 94%	35.3 ?(14.8, 19.5) -50%	38.13 ?(17.15, 20.98) -63%	42.68 ?(21.08, 21.6) -82%	42.7 ?(23.7, 19) -82%	24.9 ?(11.6, 13.3) -6%
Response Time Black / White *	16.18 ?(8.38, 7.8)	25.7 ?(14.4, 11.3) -59%	1.318 ?(0.6225, 0.6955) 92%	1.38 ?(0.6875, 0.6925) 91%	37.53 ?(16, 21.53) -132%	22.89 ?(10.42, 12.47) -41%	22.31 ?(10.08, 12.23) -38%	25.7 ?(14.4, 11.3) -59%	30.1 ?(15.9, 14.2) -86%
PWM Frequency	60.01 ?(100)		245.4 309%	250.8 318%	6401 ?(100) 10567%
Screen		-41%	1%	19%	28%	-4%	3%	-47%	16%
Brightness middle	474	423 -11%	459 -3%	600 27%	611 29%	418 -12%	467 -1%	352 -26%	529 12%
Brightness	447	396 -11%	462 3%	604 35%	605 35%	402 -10%	468 5%	339 -24%	490 10%
Brightness Distribution	89	88 -1%	97 9%	96 8%	92 3%	90 1%	92 3%	85 -4%	86 -3%
Black Level *	0.32	0.29 9%				0.28 12%	0.49 -53%	0.45 -41%	0.37 -16%
Contrast	1481	1459 -1%				1493 1%	953 -36%	782 -47%	1430 -3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.16	5.32 -68%	2.2 30%	2.7 15%	1.4 56%	2.3 27%	1.4 56%	4.79 -52%	1.35 57%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.37	9.87 -84%	4.9 9%	5.3 1%	3.3 39%	5.4 -1%	3.3 39%	8.65 -61%	2.45 54%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.5	6.6 -164%	3.6 -44%	1.8 28%	2.3 8%	3.7 -48%	2.3 8%	5.5 -120%	2.1 16%
Gamma	2.09 ^105%	2.159 ^102%	2.09 ^105%	2.09 ^105%	2.22 ^99%	2.21 ^100%	2.21 ^100%	2.118 ^104%	2.183 ^101%
CCT	7112 ^91%	7979 ^81%	6558 ^99%	6461 ^101%	6930 ^94%	6595 ^99%	6852 ^95%	7889 ^82%	6939 ^94%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-53% / -46%	83% / 55%	94% / 69%	1745% / 1173%	-28% / -13%	-29% / -10%	-59% / -52%	-15% / 4%

* ... smaller is better

具有默认色温的真实模式（色彩空间目标：sRGB）

OnePlus为Pad提供了三种颜色模式，即Vivd、自然和真实。在我们使用X-Rite i1Basic Pro 3分光光度计和Portrait Displays的Calman Ultimate色彩校准软件进行的测试中，我们发现Real色彩配置文件提供了最佳的色彩准确性和最高的sRGB色域覆盖率。

ColorChecker 平均 dE2000: 3.16.最大dE2000: 5.37

自然模式，默认色温（色彩空间目标：sRGB）

自然模式与真实模式非常相似，但在这里我们看到灰度dE2000的增加。然而，颜色显示的偏差要小得多。

ColorChecker 平均 dE2000: 2.57.最大dE2000: 5.91

默认色温的生动模式（色彩空间目标：DCI-P3）。

生动覆盖了96.3%的DCI-P3色彩空间，但我们看到灰度和ColorChecker的偏差很大。然而，从主观上讲，用户可能更喜欢这种设置，因为颜色看起来更强烈。

ColorChecker 平均 dE2000: 4.55.最大dE2000: 9.86

暖色温的生动模式（色彩空间目标：DCI-P3）

可以通过提高色温来改善Vivid的色彩准确性。这将使灰度和ColorChecker dE2000值得到可感知的改善。

ColorChecker 平均 dE2000: 2.92.最大dE2000: 6.09

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
16.18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 8.38 ms rise
16.18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 7.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
23.46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 10.9 ms rise
23.46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 12.56 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

60.01 Hz

≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 60.01 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 60.01 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

业绩

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 8192	1890 Points +48%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 Apple M1, M1 8-Core GPU, 8192	1719 Points +34%
Apple iPad 10 Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096	1580 Points +24%
OnePlus Pad MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 12288	1279 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (1211 - 1279, n=5)	1246 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1242 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1182 Points -8%
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1887, n=71, last 2 years)	707 Points -45%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	558 Points -56%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	490 Points -62%
Oppo Pad Air Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	381 Points -70%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 8192	8524 Points +113%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 Apple M1, M1 8-Core GPU, 8192	7034 Points +76%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (3736 - 4324, n=5)	4056 Points +1%
Apple iPad 10 Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096	4027 Points +1%
OnePlus Pad MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 12288	3998 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	3393 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	3293 Points -18%
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)	2496 Points -38%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	1889 Points -53%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	1797 Points -55%
Oppo Pad Air Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	1625 Points -59%

Geekbench 6.0
Single-Core
OnePlus Pad MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 12288	1663 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (1599 - 1663, n=2)	1631 Points -2%
Average of class Tablet (417 - 1663, n=4, last 2 years)	808 Points -51%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	720 Points -57%
Multi-Core
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (4130 - 4445, n=2)	4288 Points +4%
OnePlus Pad MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 12288	4130 Points
Average of class Tablet (1361 - 4130, n=4, last 2 years)	2253 Points -45%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	1965 Points -52%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 8192	1416727 Points +51%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 Apple M1, M1 8-Core GPU, 8192	1040908 Points +11%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (935522 - 1017488, n=5)	987308 Points +6%
OnePlus Pad MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 12288	935522 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	889268 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	821646 Points -12%
Apple iPad 10 Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096	691084 Points -26%
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1286774, n=49, last 2 years)	464403 Points -50%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	316212 Points -66%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	312314 Points -67%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
OnePlus Pad MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 12288	15951 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (13407 - 17573, n=4)	15462 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	13996 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	13711 Points -14%
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 20841, n=73, last 2 years)	9812 Points -38%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	9578 Points -40%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	9475 Points -41%
Oppo Pad Air Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	6423 Points -60%

CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 8192	1584 Points +42%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 Apple M1, M1 8-Core GPU, 8192	1266 Points +14%
OnePlus Pad MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 12288	1114 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1090 Points -2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (948 - 1114, n=3)	1038 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	999 Points -10%
Apple iPad 10 Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096	987 Points -11%
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=63, last 2 years)	772 Points -31%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	575 Points -48%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	568 Points -49%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (7255 - 7714, n=3)	7474 Points 0%
OnePlus Pad MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 12288	7453 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	6816 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	6283 Points -16%
Average of class Tablet (444 - 11721, n=59, last 2 years)	4210 Points -44%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	2988 Points -60%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	2855 Points -62%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 8192	Points -100%
Apple iPad 10 Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
System
OnePlus Pad MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 12288	10635 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (9398 - 11650, n=3)	10561 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	10112 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	9273 Points -13%
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 16435, n=59, last 2 years)	7279 Points -32%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	6509 Points -39%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	5261 Points -51%
Memory
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (6873 - 7900, n=3)	7458 Points +9%
OnePlus Pad MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 12288	6873 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	6763 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	5739 Points -16%
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10977, n=59, last 2 years)	4874 Points -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	3550 Points -48%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	3454 Points -50%
Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	22308 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	22283 Points +1%
OnePlus Pad MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 12288	22155 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (19574 - 22155, n=3)	20741 Points -6%
Average of class Tablet (580 - 57192, n=59, last 2 years)	9171 Points -59%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	2875 Points -87%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	2762 Points -88%
Web
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (1906 - 1951, n=3)	1921 Points +1%
OnePlus Pad MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 12288	1906 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1415 Points -26%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	1325 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1291 Points -32%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2051, n=59, last 2 years)	1269 Points -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	1201 Points -37%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	73266 Points +145%
OnePlus Pad MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 12288	29879 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (29236 - 30392, n=3)	29836 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 74821, n=57, last 2 years)	11329 Points -62%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	9218 Points -69%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	9213 Points -69%

AImark - Score v3.x
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (27367 - 28688, n=2)	28028 Points +2%
OnePlus Pad MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 12288	27367 Points
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=51, last 2 years)	7152 Points -74%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	892 Points -97%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	877 Points -97%

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	6909 Points +199%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	4144 Points +79%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2493 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2325 Points +1%
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	2310 Points
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	2124 Points -8%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	330 Points -86%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	329 Points -86%
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	125 Points -95%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	6919 Points +191%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	4913 Points +107%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2473 Points +4%
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	2377 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2337 Points -2%
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	2250 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	343 Points -86%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	342 Points -86%
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	124 Points -95%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	25317 Points +198%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	18309 Points +115%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9519 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8798 Points +4%
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	8539 Points 0%
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	8497 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1215 Points -86%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1109 Points -87%
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	447 Points -95%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	5321 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3728 Points -30%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3717 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3651 Points -31%
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2807 Points -47%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	14734 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	13039 Points +3%
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	12658 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2442 Points -81%
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1184 Points -91%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	9689 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8799 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8374 Points -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2644 Points -73%
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1359 Points -86%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2583 Points
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1337 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2412 Points
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1162 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3439 Points
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2830 Points

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps +98%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	60 fps 0%
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	60 fps 0%
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	60 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	58 fps -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	55 fps -8%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	873 fps +255%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	557 fps +126%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	334 fps +36%
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	317 fps +29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	288 fps +17%
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	246 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	64 fps -74%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	63 fps -74%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	90 fps +50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	79 fps +32%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	60 fps 0%
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	60 fps 0%
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	60 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	38 fps -37%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	35 fps -42%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	494 fps +179%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	317 fps +79%
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	177 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	171 fps -3%
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	171 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	163 fps -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	40 fps -77%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	40 fps -77%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	115 fps +125%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	60 fps +18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59 fps +16%
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	58 fps +14%
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	51 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	50 fps -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	23 fps -55%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	23 fps -55%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	340 fps +166%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	229 fps +79%
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	128 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	121 fps -5%
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	120 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	115 fps -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	25 fps -80%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	25 fps -80%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	89 fps +178%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	60 fps +88%
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	45 fps +41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	43 fps +34%
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	32 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	28 fps -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	13 fps -59%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	13 fps -59%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	214 fps +193%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	153.5 fps +110%
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	75 fps +3%
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	73 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	72 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	68 fps -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	15 fps -79%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	15 fps -79%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	70 fps +169%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	60 fps +131%
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	34 fps +31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	32 fps +23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	27 fps +4%
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	26 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	9.5 fps -63%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.4 fps -68%
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.3 fps -80%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	90 fps +143%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	60.9 fps +65%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	37 fps 0%
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	37 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	35 fps -5%
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	32 fps -14%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.9 fps -84%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.4 fps -85%
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3.2 fps -91%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	89 fps +147%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	60 fps +67%
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	47 fps +31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps +22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	39 fps +8%
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	36 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	14 fps -61%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	12 fps -67%
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.9 fps -75%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	241 fps +159%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	149 fps +60%
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	94 fps +1%
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	93 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	92 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	89 fps -4%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	16 fps -83%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	14 fps -85%
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	9.7 fps -90%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	48 fps +182%
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	17 fps
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	16 fps -6%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2.5 fps -85%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2.4 fps -86%
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1.4 fps -92%

Basemark GPUScore

OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000; GPUScore: The Expedition; Official Native; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø19.9 (12.3-285)

Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; Official Native; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø38.8 (15.1-95.8)

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe; GPUScore: The Expedition; Official Native; 1.0.0 : Ø41 (19.8-57.3)

OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000; GPUScore: The Expedition; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø26 (17.1-257)

Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø31.3 (12.8-74.5)

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe; GPUScore: The Expedition; 2560x1440 Official; 1.0.0 : Ø46.1 (27.6-58.5)

OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000; GPUScore: Sacred Path; Official Native; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3: Ø8.99 (7.16-21.2)

Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; Official Native; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3: Ø14 (9.28-79)

OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000; GPUScore: Sacred Path; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3: Ø11.4 (9.03-99.2)

Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3: Ø11.4 (7.67-73.2)

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	225.315 Points +52%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 (Safari 15)	184.3 Points +24%
Apple iPad 10 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	178.932 Points +21%
OnePlus Pad (Chrome 112)	148.115 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (127.2 - 148.6, n=3)	141.3 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra (Chrome 100)	126.3 Points -15%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=69, last 2 years)	108.7 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G (Samsung Browser V16)	95.424 Points -36%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) (Chrome 112)	55.947 Points -62%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	55.842 Points -62%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	376 runs/min +216%
Apple iPad 10 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	272 runs/min +129%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 (Safari 15)	255 runs/min +114%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (110 - 151, n=3)	126.7 runs/min +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra (Chrome 100)	119 runs/min 0%
OnePlus Pad (Chrome 112)	119 runs/min
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=63, last 2 years)	115.5 runs/min -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G (Samsung Browser V16)	99.7 runs/min -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	38.1 runs/min -68%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) (Chome 112)	31 runs/min -74%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	227 Points +44%
OnePlus Pad (Chrome 112)	158 Points
Apple iPad 10 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	147 Points -7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (100 - 158, n=3)	137 Points -13%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=68, last 2 years)	104.3 Points -34%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) (Chrome 112)	57 Points -64%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	56 Points -65%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	74614 Points +48%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 (Safari 15)	66974 Points +33%
Apple iPad 10 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	59963 Points +19%
OnePlus Pad (Chrome 112)	50429 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (47420 - 50714, n=3)	49521 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra (Chrome 100)	48281 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G (Samsung Browser V16)	41829 Points -17%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years)	28653 Points -43%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	17557 Points -65%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) (Chrome 112)	17239 Points -66%
Oppo Pad Air (Chrome 109)	12402 Points -75%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=74, last 2 years)	3789 ms * -375%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	2443.7 ms * -206%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) (Chrome 112)	2268.5 ms * -184%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G (Samsung Browser V16)	936.3 ms * -17%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (798 - 1103, n=3)	916 ms * -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra (Chrome 100)	839 ms * -5%
OnePlus Pad (Chrome 112)	797.7 ms *
Apple iPad 10 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	547 ms * +31%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 (Safari 15)	499 ms * +37%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	450.9 ms * +43%

* ... smaller is better

	OnePlus Pad	Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra	Xiaomi Redmi Pad	Oppo Pad Air	Global Average -3	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		-55%	-28%	-34%	-40%	-54%	-72%	-51%
Sequential Read 256KB	1866.48	822.4 -56%	1726.34 -8%	1817 -3%	976.9 -48%	921.6 -51%	630 ?(4.36 - 4512, n=1752) -66%	1045 ?(163 - 3912, n=74, last 2 years) -44%
Sequential Write 256KB	1616.83	490.6 -70%	1374.65 -15%	451.6 -72%	883.6 -45%	717 -56%	365 ?(2.04 - 3908, n=1752) -77%	684 ?(78.2 - 3154, n=74, last 2 years) -58%
Random Read 4KB	341.39	204.8 -40%	202.35 -41%	238 -30%	250.82 -27%	177.1 -48%	107.1 ?(1.04 - 543, n=1752) -69%	189.2 ?(18.4 - 451, n=74, last 2 years) -45%
Random Write 4KB	420.93	201.3 -52%	218.02 -48%	284.9 -32%	257.02 -39%	172.8 -59%	96.3 ?(3.84 - 753, n=1753) -77%	189.5 ?(8.23 - 555, n=74, last 2 years) -55%