Onyx Boox Note Air 3 评论:漂亮的电子墨水平板电脑,支持应用程序,甚至黑白两色
潜在的竞争对手比较
Bewertung | Datum | Modell | Gewicht | Laufwerk | Groesse | Aufloesung | Preis ab |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
79 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2024 | Onyx Boox Note Air 3 SD 680, Adreno 610 | 430 g | 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 10.30" | 1872x1404 | |
77.5 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2023 | Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C SD 680, Adreno 610 | 430 g | 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 10.30" | 1240x930 | |
75.2 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2023 | Lenovo Smart Paper RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2 | 408 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 10.30" | 1872x1404 | |
79.4 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | Huawei MatePad Paper Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6 | 360 g | 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 10.30" | 1872x1404 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
机箱和设备:出色但沉重的铝制机箱
在试用了 奥尼克斯 Boox Note Air 3 C彩色显示屏之后,我们现在来看看没有 "C "字样但配备黑白电子墨水显示屏的 Onyx Boox Note Air 3。该平板电脑的外壳与彩色版本相同,都是经典的黑灰色,并带有橙色亮点,机身厚度仅为 5.8 毫米。
这款平板电脑重 430 克,与彩屏版一样重,因此对于 10.3 英寸屏幕的电子墨水平板电脑来说相对较重。
制造商采用缟玛瑙玻璃对显示屏进行保护,使正面平整。总体而言,该产品的制造质量和稳定性都达到了较高的标准。不过,屏幕周围有一个缝隙,在上面移动时感觉有些不舒服。
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 配备 64GB UFS 2.1 内存和 4GB RAM,可提供与同类电子墨水平板电脑类似的文件空间。
此外还配备了 microSD 读卡器,我们使用 Angelbird V60 参考卡进行了测试。在复制测试和 CPDT 基准测试中,读卡器的表现略好于 Note Air 3 C在复制测试和 CPDT 基准测试中,读卡器的表现略好于 Note Air 3 C,文件传输的整体速度也不错。不过,读卡器无法充分发挥 microSD 卡的速度潜力。
USB-C 端口用于数据传输和充电以及连接外围设备。不过,它只能按照 USB 2.0 标准连接,因此速度不是最快的。
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 (Angelbird V60) | |
Average of class Tablet (7.61 - 101.6, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C (Angelbird V60) |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信、软件和操作:基于Android 12
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 只使用 WiFi 5 标准,因此平均速度介于 300 到 350 Mbps 之间,这正是您所期望的。华为 华为 MatePad Paper显示,在这个价格范围内,Wi-Fi 6 的速度甚至可以更高。因此,Onyx Boox Air 3 并不能充分利用千兆互联网连接,但仍能为日常使用提供不错的吞吐量。
这款电子墨水平板电脑的软件基于Android 12,并预装了 Google Play Store,以便下载应用程序。在绝大多数情况下,这都能顺利运行,要求不高的应用程序也能在设备上流畅运行。不过,需要注意的是,由于黑白屏反应较慢,只有 16 种灰度,因此电子阅读器并不适合快节奏的游戏和视频。
主菜单的布局也与传统的Android 平板电脑截然不同:电子书库、商店和便签功能显然是针对电子阅读器的特殊功能和主要用途而设计的。说到商店:你不应该对它抱有过高的期望。至少在欧洲,你不能购买书籍,只能下载开源书籍。
触摸屏反应稳定,但比 OLED 或 IPS 显示屏慢得多。你必须习惯这一点,在键盘上快速键入时也要有耐心。可以设置密码或口令来保护数据。此外,Onyx Boox Note Air 3 还可以使用集成在待机键上的指纹扫描仪进行生物解锁。手指首次注册后,即可安全快速地进行解锁。
这款电子墨水平板电脑配有一支手写笔,可用来手写笔记或绘图。Google Play 商店中的应用程序也可用于此目的,不会出现任何兼容性问题。触控笔也是一种精确的操作工具,尤其是在操作屏幕上的小按钮时。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Huawei MatePad Paper | |
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C | |
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 | |
Lenovo Smart Paper | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Huawei MatePad Paper | |
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 | |
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C | |
Lenovo Smart Paper |
电子阅读:全面支持笔输入
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 支持多种文档格式,如亚马逊书籍的 AZW3、TXT、HTML、CBR、CBZ、RTF、FB2、DOC、DOCX、PRC、MOBI、CHM 和 EPUB。此外,由于支持Android 应用程序,还可以在平板电脑上轻松安装和使用其他阅读器应用程序。
Neo Reader 是预装的电子阅读应用程序:它可以让你快速滚动浏览书籍,预览下一页,通过进度条跳转到书籍或文档中完全不同的位置,还提供自动翻页功能,允许你单独设置到下一页的时间。如果需要,文本转语音功能还可以朗读书籍。
该软件还全面支持手写笔,可用于做标记或笔记。屏幕还可以分割,这样您就可以将注释保存在单独的文档中,而图书文本则是可见的。
显示屏高分辨率电子墨水卡塔
采用的是分辨率为 1,872 x 1,404 像素的电子墨水卡塔显示屏。我们在 联想智能纸和 华为 MatePad Paper.电子墨水平板电脑的工作原理与传统的 OLED 或 IPS 显示屏截然不同:它有一个哑光表面和实际的黑白彩色颗粒,这些颗粒带有不同的电子电荷。现在,这些粒子可以被激活或停用,以组成图像。图像还可以保持静态,无需额外能量。
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 的显示屏可显示 16 种灰度,采用 LED 照明,亮度可达 121 cd/m²。由于对比度很高,而且图像实际上是由物理微粒构成的,因此在环境光下完全可以省去内置照明。
灰度很少,无法过于准确地表现亮度的细微差别,但一旦设置好,图像也不会闪烁。只有前景照明可能会闪烁,因为它是 LED 解决方案。不过,制造商承诺会通过直流电源来解决这个问题。
图像生成需要一些时间,快速运动看起来更像是幻灯片放映。
|
Brightness Distribution: 81 %
Center on Battery: 109 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Greyscale 9.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.024
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 E-Ink, 1872x1404, 10.3" | Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C E-Ink Kaleido 3, 1240x930, 10.3" | Lenovo Smart Paper E-Ink, 1872x1404, 10.3" | Huawei MatePad Paper E-Ink, 1872x1404, 10.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Response Times | 28% | 46% | 26% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 154.5 ? | 121 ? 22% | 134.4 ? 13% | 121 ? 22% |
Response Time Black / White * | 133.2 ? | 89.3 ? 33% | 27.5 ? 79% | 94 ? 29% |
PWM Frequency | ||||
Screen | -29% | 1% | -21% | |
Brightness middle | 109 | 46.5 -57% | 113 4% | 61.9 -43% |
Brightness | 109 | 47 -57% | 106 -3% | 60 -45% |
Brightness Distribution | 81 | 91 12% | 83 2% | 80 -1% |
Black Level * | ||||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 9.8 | 11.1 -13% | 9.9 -1% | 9.1 7% |
Gamma | 2.024 109% | 1.211 182% | 1.371 160% | 2.02 109% |
CCT | 8885 73% | 6463 101% | 7116 91% | 6848 95% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 20.45 | |||
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 39.33 | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1% /
-10% | 24% /
16% | 3% /
-5% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
133.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 61.7 ms rise | |
↘ 71.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
154.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 66.4 ms rise | |
↘ 88.1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能、排放和电池寿命良好的续航能力,适合晚上阅读
高通 高通骁龙 680是 2020 年推出的一款略显老旧的 SoC。它采用相对节能的 6 纳米工艺制造,提供八个处理器内核,主频高达 2.4 GHz。在阅读书籍和文档时,它能提供比廉价电子阅读器更强的动力,让你获得流畅的体验。
骁龙 680 处理器一般足以支持 Google Play 商店中的应用程序。不过,您也不要对它抱有过高的期望,应避免使用非常复杂的应用程序,否则会导致体验迟缓。尽管如此,如果你只是想写个信息或上上网,速度还是足够的。
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 配备了用于数据存储的 UFS 2.1 闪存。这可以实现快速数据传输,缩短应用程序的加载时间。
Onyx 在平板电脑的一侧安装了两个扬声器,因此横向使用时会产生轻微的立体声效果。有声读物或收音机可以清晰地播放,但声音非常低沉,高音偏重,因此音乐甚至电影的音效都比较弱。
您可以通过 USB-C 或蓝牙连接外置扬声器或耳机。这样做没有任何问题,而且音效明显更好。
平板电脑的电池容量为 700 毫安时。将屏幕亮度调至较低时,您可以浏览一本书长达 17:32 小时,然后才需要插入电子阅读器。因此,即使在冬季长时间阅读,也不会因电池寿命问题而受到影响。
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 | Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C | Lenovo Smart Paper | Huawei MatePad Paper | Average 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 1% | -80% | 1% | -25% | 43% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 687.4 | 690.8 0% | 163 -76% | 880.1 28% | 696 ? 1% | 1045 ? 52% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 381 | 384.1 1% | 139 -64% | 256.2 -33% | 224 ? -41% | 684 ? 80% |
Random Read 4KB | 151.7 | 157.7 4% | 25.3 -83% | 145.6 -4% | 137.2 ? -10% | 189.2 ? 25% |
Random Write 4KB | 164.2 | 160.5 -2% | 8.8 -95% | 183.1 12% | 84.7 ? -48% | 189.5 ? 15% |
温度
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 23.8 °C / 75 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 24.1 °C / 75 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.8 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
3DMark Wild Life Stress Test
扬声器
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.3% higher than median
(-) | highs are not linear (15.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 89% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MatePad Paper audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
Battery Runtime - Reader / Idle | |
Average of class Tablet (691 - 5003, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 | |
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C | |
Lenovo Smart Paper | |
Huawei MatePad Paper |
Pros
Cons
评语支持应用程序,灵活的电子墨水平板电脑
就像色彩斑斓的 Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C一样,黑白屏幕的 Onyx Boox Note Air 3 也是一款非常时尚、多功能、存储容量大的电子墨水平板电脑。它还提供通过 microSD 扩展存储空间的选项,采用坚固的金属外壳,作为一款电子阅读器,它具有相当不错的性能和稳定的无线局域网连接。
手写笔还能让平板电脑轻松用作虚拟记事本。然而,最重要的是,该平板电脑能够快速、方便地安装和使用Android 应用程序,这使其具有了专有软件阅读器所不具备的灵活性。
电子墨水屏非常适合阅读文档,由于有照明功能,在黑暗环境中使用也不会有任何问题。不过,它很难用于视频和其他快节奏的内容。不过,显示屏不会闪烁,对比度也很高。
通过 Onyx Boox Note Air 3,制造商提供了一款高品质的电子阅读器,其Android 应用支持和较长的运行时间给人留下了深刻印象"。
联想和华为等知名制造商现在也涉足价格更高的电子墨水平板电脑领域。联想 联想智能纸不过,它配备的处理器速度非常慢,而华为的 MatePad Paper安装应用程序。
价格和供应情况
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 可在我们的租赁商 Kex的网上商店购买,价格为 450 欧元。售价 450 欧元。也可通过Ebay上有售,价格高出 20 欧元。
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 在德国亚马逊上的售价为 450 欧元。
Onyx Boox Note Air 3
- 01/25/2024 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.