Onyx Boox Page 评论 -Android- 便捷电子墨水平板电脑上的应用程序

Name: Onyx Boox Page
Brand: Onyx Boox

紧凑实用？

Onyx Boox Page 只有 7 英寸，是一款非常方便的电子阅读器，它使用Android 作为操作系统。在显示屏上阅读确实很有趣，但你还能在反应时间很慢的黑白显示屏上使用其他应用程序吗？

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 12/17/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM E-Ink Tablet

Test device courtesy of KEX

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Onyx Boox Page

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Kryo 260

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 610

Memory

3 GB

Display

7.00 inch 4:3, 1682 x 1264 pixel 301 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, E-Ink, Carta1200 Screen with AG glass flat cover-lens, glossy: yes

Storage

32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB

, 23 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, Card Reader: microSD

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 6 x 156 x 137

Battery

2300 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Android 11

Additional features

Speakers: mono speaker, USB cable, card slot tool, 12 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

195 g

Price

290 Euro

Links

Onyx Boox homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
77.2 % v7 ^(old)	12 / 2023	Onyx Boox Page SD 662, Adreno 610	195 g	32 GB eMMC Flash	7.00"	1682x1264
77.5 % v7 ^(old)	11 / 2023	Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C SD 680, Adreno 610	430 g	64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	10.30"	1240x930
79.4 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2022	Huawei MatePad Paper Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6	360 g	64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	10.30"	1872x1404
75.2 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2023	Lenovo Smart Paper RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2	408 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	10.30"	1872x1404

外壳和功能 - 塑料，内存有限

Onyx Boox 提供许多带有电子墨水显示屏的电子阅读器和大型平板电脑。例如，我们最近测试了 Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C (亚马逊网站上售价约为 550 欧元（约合 600 美元））或 Tab Ultra C Pro(约合 700 欧元（约合 764 美元），这两款产品均采用彩色显示屏。现在让我们仔细看看 Onyx Boox Page，这款 7 英寸设备的体积更小巧，价格也更便宜：售价仅为 290 欧元（约合人民币 316 元）。虽然它只有一块黑白相间的 Carta 1200 电子墨水显示屏，但却能像它的大哥哥们一样处理Android 应用程序。

Onyx Boox Page 的深灰色塑料外壳设计精美，背面印有触感良好的字母图案。该设备表面光洁，本身很稳定，但按压时力度适中，吱吱作响的声音比较明显。

边框的一侧较宽，这样电子阅读器就可以舒适地单手握持。这里还有两个按钮，可以用来轻松翻阅电子书。该阅读器重 195 克（约 6.9 盎司），与智能手机差不多重，可以舒适地长时间握在手中。

3GB RAM 和 32GB 大容量存储空间对于电子阅读器来说已经足够。不过，由于这款小巧的电子墨水平板电脑还可用于其他活动，如听音乐或Android 应用程序，因此使用 microSD 卡扩展内存也是件好事。在我们使用 Angelbird V60 参考卡进行的测试中，读卡器的速度相当快。

可通过蓝牙 5.0 连接外部设备。数据可通过 USB-C 端口直接与电脑交换，该端口还可用于为设备充电。

尺寸比较

Huawei MatePad Paper Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Lenovo Smart Paper Onyx Boox Page DIN A5 ❌

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Onyx Boox Page (Angelbird V60)	34.6 MB/s
Average of class Tablet (7.61 - 101.6, n=59, last 2 years)	34.4 MB/s -1%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C (Angelbird V60)	28.6 MB/s -17%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Onyx Boox Page Adreno 610, SD 662, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38.3 (28.9-51.1)

Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø43.5 (28.7-54.3)

Onyx Boox Page Adreno 610, SD 662, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø73.2 (31.7-81.3)

Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø77.9 (35.8-86.7)

通信、软件和操作 -Android 作为操作系统

WiFi 5 是 Onyx Boox Page 所配备的最快的 Wi-Fi 标准。因此，这款平板电脑的传输速率在其价格范围内还算不错，但有时会出现明显的下降，尤其是在接收方向。我们在使用参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 进行测试时就注意到了这一点。遗憾的是，Onyx Boox Page 不支持移动网络。

使用的软件是Android 11，但界面非常符合电子阅读器的要求，因此重点是电子书库。遗憾的是，Onyx Boox Store 不能在欧洲使用，但至少有一些开源的英文书籍。Google Play 商店预装在一个名为 "Apps "的独立版块中，也可用于下载亚马逊 Kindle、Tolino 等第三方供应商提供的阅读器应用程序。几乎所有的Android 应用程序都可以在平板电脑上使用，但由于黑白显示屏的帧率较低，视频或游戏通常用不上。

电源按钮位于底部边缘，屏幕旁边还有滚动按钮。平板电脑没有生物识别保护选项，例如指纹传感器。你只能设置密码来保护数据。触摸屏对我们的输入反应良好，但由于电子墨水显示屏和系统功耗较低，操作时可能会有轻微延迟。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Huawei MatePad Paper	945 (826^min - 958^max) MBit/s +164%
Onyx Boox Page	358 (341^min - 374^max) MBit/s
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C	350 (322^min - 366^max) MBit/s -2%
Lenovo Smart Paper	286 (236^min - 308^max) MBit/s -20%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Huawei MatePad Paper	928 (812^min - 949^max) MBit/s +222%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C	294 (274^min - 318^max) MBit/s +2%
Onyx Boox Page	288 (161^min - 322^max) MBit/s
Lenovo Smart Paper	211 (186^min - 246^max) MBit/s -27%

Legend

Onyx Boox Page Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Huawei MatePad Paper HiSilicon Kirin 820e, ARM Mali-G57 MP6, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Lenovo Smart Paper Rockchip RK3566, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Onyx Boox Page; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø287 (161-322)

Onyx Boox Page; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø358 (341-374)

电子阅读 - 多种设置选项

该阅读器可处理以下格式：pdf、djvu、azw、azw3、doc、docm、docx、epub、fb2、fbz、html、mobi、odt、prc、rtf、sxw、trc、txt、chm 和 ppt。不过，由于应用程序的支持，更奇特的格式也不在话下。

打开兼容文件时默认启动的 Neo Reader 提供了多种选项：你可以使用双指手势放大或缩小文本，在一定时间后自动翻页，全面调整文本格式，还可以优化对比度以获得最佳可视性。此外，它还具有与谷歌语音合成技术配合使用的文本到语音功能。预设的语音能可靠地朗读文本，但听起来不是很悦耳，而且在诗歌文本中，重点往往很奇怪。

显示屏 - 带有明亮背光

E-Ink-Carta1200 显示屏的像素为 1,682 x 1,264 像素，对角线为 7 英寸。这是一款黑白显示屏。该面板于 2021 年推出，与前代产品相比，对比度更高，响应速度更快。

不过，电子墨水显示屏的特殊功能在这里也同样适用：其响应时间和帧速率无法与 IPS 或 OLED 面板相比，因此几乎无法播放电影或玩快节奏游戏。此外，更新图像后往往会残留之前屏幕内容的重影。

另一方面，在显示文档时，即使没有背光源，在环境光线充足的情况下，屏幕的对比度和可读性也非常出色。图像设置完成后，即使在没有电源的情况下也能保留静态图像。这样既美观又能降低能耗。

Onyx Boox Page 上的照明实际上相当明亮：在使用分光光度计和 CalMAN 软件进行的测试中，我们测得的亮度高达 151 cd/m²。我们没有注意到任何 PWM 闪烁。


129 cd/m²	145 cd/m²	143 cd/m²
137 cd/m²	141 cd/m²	151 cd/m²
139 cd/m²	140 cd/m²	148 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 151 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 141.4 cd/m² Minimum: 0.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 141 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)

	Onyx Boox Page E-Ink, 1682x1264, 7"	Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C E-Ink Kaleido 3, 1240x930, 10.3"	Huawei MatePad Paper E-Ink, 1872x1404, 10.3"	Lenovo Smart Paper E-Ink, 1872x1404, 10.3"
Response Times		11%	9%	32%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	120 ?(47, 73)	121 ?(66.8, 54.2) -1%	121 ?(61, 60) -1%	134.4 ?(56.2, 68.2) -12%
Response Time Black / White *	116 ?(49, 67)	89.3 ?(43.5, 45.8) 23%	94 ?(47, 47) 19%	27.5 ?(14.4, 13.1) 76%
PWM Frequency
Screen		-42%	-40%	-16%
Brightness middle	141	46.5 -67%	61.9 -56%	113 -20%
Brightness	141	47 -67%	60 -57%	106 -25%
Brightness Distribution	85	91 7%	80 -6%	83 -2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *		20.45
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *		39.33
Greyscale dE 2000 *		11.1	9.1	9.9
Gamma		1.211 ^182%	2.02 ^109%	1.371 ^160%
CCT		6463 ^101%	6848 ^95%	7116 ^91%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-16% / -21%	-16% / -20%	8% / 3%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
116 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 49 ms rise
116 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 67 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
120 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 47 ms rise
120 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 73 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

性能、排放和电池寿命 - 动力一般

高通高通骁龙 662用作 SoC。它来自 2019 年，速度足以让你相当流畅地滚动浏览书籍和菜单。在使用应用程序时，必须考虑到有限的 RAM 和缓慢的数据存储，这意味着电子墨水平板电脑在处理非常复杂的应用程序时很吃力。不过，大多数电子阅读应用程序都能在平板电脑上流畅运行，而且电量通常足以满足日常使用。

上网时，偶尔会遇到加载网页和图片时延迟的问题。如果你只是想在互联网上快速查看一些内容，电量是足够的。但是，如果您在浏览器上花费大量时间，强制暂停可能会让您感到厌烦。

即使在长时间负载的情况下，Onyx Boox Page 的最高发热温度也仅为 29.5 °C（85.1 °F）。处理器的性能在长时间使用后也不会降低。

电子墨水平板电脑配有扬声器，可以直接播放有声读物或音乐。扬声器的音量不大，听起来高音偏重。声音可以听得很清楚，但听起来不是很饱满。外部音频设备可通过 USB-C 端口或蓝牙连接。这样做没有任何问题，声音输出清晰，中低音也明显增加。

制造商在 Onyx Boox Page 的小巧外壳中内置了 2300 毫安时电池。这意味着电池容量明显低于较大的设备，实际上你不得不使用较短的电池续航时间：在背光极弱的情况下，通过我们的脚本定期翻页，电子墨水平板电脑的续航时间约为 15 小时。这足以满足一天的休闲阅读。

该平板电脑的最大充电功率为 10 瓦，因此电池充满电需要大约 2:30 小时。

Geekbench 5.5 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench | Octane V2

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1887, n=71, last 2 years)	707 Points +157%
Huawei MatePad Paper HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096	566 Points +106%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	323 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (275 - 316, n=13)	308 Points +12%
Onyx Boox Page Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072	275 Points
Lenovo Smart Paper Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	143 Points -48%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)	2494 Points +227%
Huawei MatePad Paper HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096	1853 Points +143%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (763 - 1453, n=13)	1299 Points +70%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	1287 Points +69%
Onyx Boox Page Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072	763 Points
Lenovo Smart Paper Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	312 Points -59%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 20841, n=73, last 2 years)	9847 Points +208%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (3195 - 7554, n=6)	5608 Points +76%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	4535 Points +42%
Lenovo Smart Paper Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	4045 Points +27%
Onyx Boox Page Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072	3195 Points

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Huawei MatePad Paper HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096	2571 Points +127%
Average of class Tablet (361 - 14235, n=46, last 2 years)	2067 Points +83%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	1231 Points +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (1106 - 1905, n=12)	1220 Points +8%
Onyx Boox Page Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072	1131 Points
Lenovo Smart Paper Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	567 Points -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Huawei MatePad Paper HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096	2675 Points +168%
Average of class Tablet (290 - 24605, n=46, last 2 years)	2198 Points +120%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	1077 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (974 - 1074, n=12)	1017 Points +2%
Onyx Boox Page Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072	998 Points
Lenovo Smart Paper Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	517 Points -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Average of class Tablet (858 - 5751, n=46, last 2 years)	2797 Points +32%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	2462 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (2108 - 2513, n=12)	2368 Points +12%
Huawei MatePad Paper HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096	2262 Points +7%
Onyx Boox Page Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072	2113 Points
Lenovo Smart Paper Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	858 Points -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (267 - 17674, n=66, last 2 years)	4499 Points +508%
Huawei MatePad Paper HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096	4281 Points +479%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (740 - 1197, n=12)	1135 Points +53%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	1079 Points +46%
Onyx Boox Page Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072	740 Points
Lenovo Smart Paper Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	596 Points -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (240 - 29325, n=66, last 2 years)	5876 Points +815%
Huawei MatePad Paper HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096	4472 Points +597%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	1191 Points +86%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (642 - 1081, n=12)	999 Points +56%
Onyx Boox Page Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072	642 Points
Lenovo Smart Paper Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	530 Points -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Huawei MatePad Paper HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096	3725 Points +135%
Average of class Tablet (441 - 7451, n=66, last 2 years)	3632 Points +129%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (1588 - 2534, n=12)	2240 Points +41%
Onyx Boox Page Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072	1588 Points
Lenovo Smart Paper Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1061 Points -33%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	812 Points -49%
Wild Life Score
Huawei MatePad Paper HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096	1925 Points +405%
Average of class Tablet (286 - 7933, n=60, last 2 years)	1748 Points +359%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	437 Points +15%
Onyx Boox Page Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072	381 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (369 - 391, n=11)	378 Points -1%
Lenovo Smart Paper Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	286 Points -25%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average of class Tablet (289 - 32525, n=73, last 2 years)	4720 Points +1155%
Huawei MatePad Paper HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096	1886 Points +402%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	418 Points +11%
Onyx Boox Page Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072	376 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (366 - 382, n=8)	370 Points -2%
Lenovo Smart Paper Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	289 Points -23%

GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (3 - 120, n=79, last 2 years)	27.4 fps +238%
Huawei MatePad Paper HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096	19 fps +135%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (4.8 - 15, n=13)	10.5 fps +30%
Onyx Boox Page Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072	8.1 fps
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	4.6 fps -43%
Lenovo Smart Paper Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	3 fps -63%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (2.5 - 340, n=79, last 2 years)	55.9 fps +617%
Huawei MatePad Paper HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096	29 fps +272%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (7.4 - 8.6, n=13)	8.27 fps +6%
Onyx Boox Page Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072	7.8 fps
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	7.6 fps -3%
Lenovo Smart Paper Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	3.9 fps -50%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.9 - 106.4, n=79, last 2 years)	19 fps +296%
Huawei MatePad Paper HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096	13 fps +171%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (2.9 - 9.6, n=13)	6.43 fps +34%
Onyx Boox Page Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072	4.8 fps
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	2.7 fps -44%
Lenovo Smart Paper Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1.9 fps -60%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (0.9 - 114.5, n=79, last 2 years)	21.3 fps +634%
Huawei MatePad Paper HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096	10 fps +245%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	2.9 fps 0%
Onyx Boox Page Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072	2.9 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (2.5 - 2.9, n=13)	2.78 fps -4%
Lenovo Smart Paper Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1.4 fps -52%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (0.4 - 55.1, n=77, last 2 years)	10 fps +809%
Huawei MatePad Paper HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096	4.8 fps +336%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	1.3 fps +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (1.1 - 1.2, n=3)	1.133 fps +3%
Onyx Boox Page Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072	1.1 fps
Lenovo Smart Paper Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	0.6 fps -45%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=87, last 2 years)	29371 Points +211%
Huawei MatePad Paper HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096	18755 Points +99%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (8893 - 10247, n=14)	9495 Points +1%
Onyx Boox Page Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072	9440 Points
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	6358 Points -33%
Lenovo Smart Paper Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	5022 Points -47%

	Onyx Boox Page	Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C	Huawei MatePad Paper	Lenovo Smart Paper	Average 32 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		159%	151%	-43%	-33%	277%
Sequential Read 256KB	277.1	690.8 149%	880.1 218%	163 -41%	242 ?(25.8 - 452, n=247) -13%	1045 ?(163 - 3912, n=74, last 2 years) 277%
Sequential Write 256KB	116.6	384.1 229%	256.2 120%	139 19%	100.5 ?(14.8 - 196, n=247) -14%	686 ?(78.2 - 3154, n=74, last 2 years) 488%
Random Read 4KB	65	157.7 143%	145.6 124%	25.3 -61%	43.2 ?(3.59 - 117.2, n=247) -34%	189.4 ?(18.4 - 451, n=74, last 2 years) 191%
Random Write 4KB	75.4	160.5 113%	183.1 143%	8.8 -88%	22.4 ?(0.75 - 91, n=247) -70%	189.9 ?(8.23 - 555, n=74, last 2 years) 152%

温度

Max. Load

Idle


22.9 °C	23.3 °C	24.5 °C
23.1 °C	23.9 °C	29.5 °C
22.8 °C	23.5 °C	25.9 °C

Maximum: 29.5 °C
Average: 24.4 °C


29.5 °C	26.3 °C	24.6 °C
28.9 °C	25.5 °C	24.1 °C
26 °C	24 °C	23.6 °C

Maximum: 29.5 °C
Average: 25.8 °C

Power Supply (max.) 41.3 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.3 °C / 70 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

Onyx Boox Page Adreno 610, SD 662, 32 GB eMMC Flash; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.3 (2.28-2.3)

Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; 0.0.0.0: Ø11.3 (10.9-11.3)

Lenovo Smart Paper Mali-G52 MP2, RK3566, 64 GB eMMC Flash; 0.0.0.0: Ø1.728 (1.71-1.735)

发言人

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Onyx Boox Page audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (36.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 94% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 93% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 91% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命

Battery Runtime - Reader / Idle
Average of class Tablet (691 - 5003, n=63, last 2 years)	1834 min +105%
Onyx Boox Page 2300 mAh	894 min
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C 3700 mAh	1030 min
Huawei MatePad Paper 3625 mAh	963 min
Lenovo Smart Paper 3500 mAh	1056 min

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)

14h 54min

Pros

+ 明亮的背光

+ 对比度极高的 E-Ink 面板...

+ ... 高分辨率

+ 支持Android 应用程序

+ 内置扬声器

+ 轻巧方便

Cons

- 屏幕几乎不适合观看视频

- 扬声器声音高音偏重

- 无指纹传感器

结论--由于Android 应用程序，价格不贵且灵活多变

Onyx Boox Page 本身就是一款不错的 7 英寸电子阅读器，具有明亮的照明、阅读软件中丰富的设置选项、支持多种格式、滚动按钮以及高对比度、高分辨率的电子墨水显示屏。

但它也有一些特殊功能：例如扬声器和蓝牙音频输出，但最重要的是支持Android 应用程序。这使得电子墨水平板电脑的用途更加灵活，同时也减少了对电子书提供商的依赖，因为可以顺利安装其他商店的应用程序。

电池续航时间不如更大（更贵）的电子墨水平板电脑，但也足够浏览一天。扬声器听起来高音有点重，音量也不大，而且设备上的数据无法通过指纹识别进行保护。与采用传统屏幕的平板电脑相比，它的缺点也很明显：在速度较慢的电子墨水显示屏上看电影或玩快节奏游戏都很不过瘾，而且没有摄像头。

Onyx Boox Page 是一款配备 7 英寸显示屏和明亮背光的电子阅读器，由于支持Android 应用程序，其功能可以大大扩展。

如果你想要更大的阅读器，可以购买联想智能纸配备 10.3 英寸显示屏。它还支持Android 应用程序。价格贵得多，但配有彩色显示屏和金属机身的是 Onxy Boox Note Air 3 C.

价格和供应情况

您可以从我们的租赁商 KEX 购买 Onyx Boox Page。目前的价格约为 270 欧元（约合 295 美元）。您也可以通过 Ebay 从 KEX购买。购买，价格为 290 欧元（约合 316 美元），但免运费。

目前，从其他零售商处购买该阅读器并不容易，但alza.de提供。

Onyx Boox Page - 12/15/2023 v7 ^(old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis

79 / 98 → 81%

Keyboard

62 / 80 → 77%

Pointing Device

79%

Connectivity

29 / 70 → 41%

Weight

88 / 40-88 → 100%

Battery

77%

Display

81%

Games Performance

10 / 78 → 13%

Application Performance

40 / 92 → 43%

Temperature

97%

Noise

100%

Audio

49 / 91 → 54%

Average

66%

77%

Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.