Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
MagyarOppo A77 5G智能手机评测--价格高，分辨率低
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80.2 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2022 | Oppo A77 5G Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2 | 190 g | 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.56" | 1612x720 | |
| 80.5 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2022 | Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2 | 195 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.60" | 2400x1080 | |
| 80.3 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2022 | Samsung Galaxy A23 5G SD 695 5G, Adreno 619 | 197 g | 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.60" | 2408x1080 | |
| 80.8 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G SD 695 5G, Adreno 619 | 195 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.59" | 2412x1080 |
外壳和功能 - 棱角分明，防溅性强
凭借其棱角分明的外壳，Oppo A77 5G看起来现代而别致。颜色选择是浅蓝色和黑色，都有哑光闪亮的背面和金属外观的框架。外壳整体由塑料制成，但制造牢固，扭动时不会吱吱作响。
OPPO甚至将其智能手机认证为IPX4。然而，你不应该带着你的手机去潜水，因为它只能防止溅水。
奥普A77 5G有两个存储版本。
- 64GB大容量存储/4GB内存：279欧元（约合人民币275元）制造商的价格
- 128GB大容量存储/6GB内存：329欧元（约合人民币324元）制造商的价格
你可以同时将两张SIM卡插入手机，但你必须决定是用第二张SIM卡还是用microSD进行内存扩展，因为它们共用一个插槽。读卡器的数据传输速度不是很快，但仍在对比设备的范围内。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A23 5G (Angelbird V60) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (7.7 - 77, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G (Angelbird V60) | |
| Oppo A77 5G (Angelbird V60) | |
| Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信、软件和操作 - Oppo手机上稳定的WLAN
顾名思义，Oppo A77 5G是一款5G手机，只支持6GHz以下的频率。频率选择还不错，但如果出游，还是要看目的地国家能否使用4G或5G网络。
WiFi 5是Oppo的智能手机支持的最快的WLAN标准。因此，它能达到350MBit/s左右的稳定速度，这在这个级别中是很常见的。
Oppo安装了自己的UI ColorOS，它是基于Android 12。安全补丁是2022年9月的，因此在测试时仍然是相当最新的。预先安装了一些广告应用程序。
稍微凹陷和拉长的待机按钮已经显示出指纹传感器也藏在这里。它工作得相当可靠，但可以更清楚地感觉到它。通过面部识别解锁也很好用。然而，快速设置表明，这里收集的图像数据不多，该功能很容易被欺骗。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Oppo A77 5G | |
| OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A23 5G | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G | |
| Oppo A77 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A23 5G | |
照相机 - 实际上只有一个光学器件
虽然Oppo A77 5G在背面显示了两个大的相机圈，但实际上它只隐藏了一个你真正可以使用的相机。除了4800万像素的主摄像头外，即只有一个支持镜头，不拍摄自己的照片。
主摄像头通常结合每个4个像素来获得更多的感光像素，所以它通常拍摄1200万像素的照片。这些照片看起来曝光度相当好，对于中档相机来说也足够详细。
在低光照和高对比度的情况下，黑暗区域的增亮平均来说是成功的，图像噪点相当强。实验室显示，在照度为1勒克斯的情况下，仍然可以猜到主体，但细节不再可见。
视频可以在1080p下录制，最多30帧，这在这个价格范围内也很常见。亮度调节和自动对焦工作得相当好，但后者没有抽风的管理。图片质量还算不错。
前面有一个800万像素的摄像头。它的自拍效果不错，但你不应该过多地看照片，否则你会注意到相当粗糙的结构和黑暗区域的小细节。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera FlowerMain camera EnvironmentMain camera Low Light
显示屏 - 更多的像素就更好了
OPPO在其手机中安装了一个明亮的屏幕，对比度还不错，但不幸的是，有一个问题。分辨率只有720p，比大多数类似价格的智能手机的全高清屏幕低很多。这导致了更模糊的显示，在直接对比中也可以看到。
在我们的测量中，屏幕显示出轻微的偏蓝，但它在没有PWM的情况下也能应付，所以每个人都可以使用Oppo A77 5G而不感到头痛。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 592 cd/m²
Contrast: 1480:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.62 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.32
| Oppo A77 5G IPS, 1612x720, 6.6" | Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G TFT-LCD, 2400x1080, 6.6" | Samsung Galaxy A23 5G PLS, 2408x1080, 6.6" | OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G IPS, 2412x1080, 6.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | -70% | 2% | 27% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 34 ? | 50 ? -47% | 18 ? 47% | 27 ? 21% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 18 ? | 34.8 ? -93% | 26 ? -44% | 12 ? 33% |
| PWM Frequency | ||||
| Screen | -14% | -21% | -15% | |
| Brightness middle | 592 | 504 -15% | 447 -24% | 590 0% |
| Brightness | 566 | 499 -12% | 428 -24% | 561 -1% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 91 1% | 86 -4% | 92 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.4 | 0.72 -80% | 0.31 22% | 0.38 5% |
| Contrast | 1480 | 700 -53% | 1442 -3% | 1553 5% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.62 | 3.3 29% | 5.54 -20% | 5.15 -11% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.5 | 6 8% | 10.04 -54% | 10.35 -59% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.5 | 4.1 9% | 7.3 -62% | 7.1 -58% |
| Gamma | 2.32 95% | 2.28 96% | 2.03 108% | 2.143 103% |
| CCT | 7653 85% | 7041 92% | 8853 73% | 8540 76% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -42% /
-25% | -10% /
-17% | 6% /
-6% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能、排放和电池寿命 - 典型的性能，良好的运行时间
该 联发科Dimensity 810是一个中端SoC，因此很适合Oppo A77 5G。该处理器的性能还没有达到类似价格的智能手机的水平，但手机在图形领域可以跟上。在屏幕基准测试中，结果甚至相当不错，这是由于720p的分辨率对图形单元的要求较低。
很快就会发现，在日常使用中几乎没有任何性能储备。计算能力足以完成简单的任务，但当你甚至想在高要求的应用程序中调整音量时，Oppo A77 5G被推到极限。安装的UFS 2.2内存传输数据相当快。
在较长时间的负载下，43℃（109.4°F）的最高温度相当明显，但还不至于令人不快。此外，即使在长期负载下，SoC也不会出现节流现象。
底部边缘的单声道扬声器听起来有点单薄，而且相当重的高音，当你把音量增加到最大并激活 "超音量模式 "时，这种情况会被放大。这时的音量还算可以，但音乐听起来很刺耳，让人不舒服。外部音频设备可以通过一个3.5毫米插孔和蓝牙连接。许多aptX编解码器也可用于无线连接。
凭借其5000毫安时的电池，Oppo A77 5G与同类智能手机不相上下。它的电池运行时间也不错，为17:12小时。通过附带的充电器，最大充电功率为33瓦。当电池完全耗尽时，只需要不到2小时，直到电池恢复到100%。
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| Oppo A77 5G | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 810 (15 - 31, n=2) | |
| OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A23 5G | |
| Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G | |
| 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A23 5G | |
| Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G | |
| Oppo A77 5G | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 810 (17 - 17, n=2) | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| Oppo A77 5G | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 810 (9.3 - 19, n=2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A23 5G | |
| OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G | |
| Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G | |
| 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A23 5G | |
| Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G | |
| Oppo A77 5G | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 810 (6.2 - 6.2, n=2) | |
| Oppo A77 5G | Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy A23 5G | OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G | Average 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -8% | -17% | -19% | -16% | 98% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 908.5 | 964 6% | 485.1 -47% | 509.21 -44% | 770 ? -15% | 1839 ? 102% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 492.8 | 471 -4% | 487.4 -1% | 482.15 -2% | 399 ? -19% | 1425 ? 189% |
| Random Read 4KB | 182.4 | 148.8 -18% | 188.2 3% | 179.02 -2% | 156.6 ? -14% | 277 ? 52% |
| Random Write 4KB | 206.3 | 171.8 -17% | 163.1 -21% | 147.46 -29% | 177.7 ? -14% | 309 ? 50% |
温度
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.9 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
演讲者
Oppo A77 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| Samsung Galaxy A23 5G | |
| OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G | |
| Oppo A77 5G | |
| Average of class Smartphone (476 - 3244, n=202, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G | |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 适合不太高的要求
OPPO A77 5G完成了它的工作。它在大多数领域都能跟上价格相近的智能手机，除了低分辨率的屏幕和微弱的扬声器之外，几乎没有任何真正的弱点。同时，你也不应该期待太多激情。Oppo A77 5G是一个坚实的工人，没有大的野心要成为特别的东西。
只有软件和棱角分明的设计显示出一点原创性。奥普甚至还提供了IP认证，但这可能更多的是为了营销目的，因为它只是为了防止溅水。
如果你正在寻找一款具有稳定Wi-Fi、现代蓝牙和良好运行时间的时尚手机，你可以给奥普A77 5G一个机会。然而，你也应该记住与存储配置相比略高的价格，并寻找好的优惠。
Oppo A77 5G在许多方面都是一款可靠的中档手机，但你必须应对较高的价格和低分辨率的屏幕。
如果你正在寻找替代品，你会得到更便宜的 小米Poco M4 Pro 5G，这款手机的电池寿命甚至更长，甚至还有立体声扬声器。如果你喜欢ColorOS，你也可以看一下 一加Nord CE 2 Lite 5G它提供了更多的性能和更高的分辨率显示屏。
价格和可用性
Oppo A77 5G在互联网上有许多零售商提供两种内存版本。
你应该比较一下价格。在我们的贷款人cyberport.de，带有64GB大容量存储的版本价格为。测试时的价格，但已经可以在amazon.de以优惠的239欧元（约236美元）的价格出售。
128 GB的变体可在cyberport.de售价为322欧元（约合人民币318元），at amazon.de它的价格为276欧元（约272美元）。
Oppo A77 5G
- 10/22/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Price comparison
