Notebookcheck Logo

Oppo Find N3 智能手机评测--没有恼人折痕的高端可折叠手机 [Oneplus Open] (简体中文)

奇特的可折叠手机

除了可折叠 OLED 面板外,Oppo Find N3 Fold 还试图通过其强大的摄像头(包括潜望镜镜头)为自己加分。在我们对 Find N3 的评测中,您可以了解这款 OPPO 手机是否兑现了承诺。
Android Foldable Smartphone
Oppo Find N3 智能手机评测

Oppo Find N3 的构造与其姊妹机型 OnePlus Open 完全相同。 OnePlus Open- 是一款可折叠的高端智能手机,但该版本主要面向亚洲市场。因此,Oppo 可折叠手机不会在美国正式发布,只能进口。目前在网上可以买到这款手机,售价约为 1,250 美元。

Oppo Find N2 的继任者主要关注相机质量。它的主镜头(包括哈苏品牌)采用了全新的 1/1.43 英寸索尼 Lytia-T808 传感器和堆叠像素技术。从理论上讲,这对一款可折叠智能手机来说是相当有前途的。

Oppo Find N3 (Find N Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 8 x 2 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-X3 / A715 / A710 / A510 (Kryo)
Graphics adapter
Memory
16 GB 
Display
7.82 inch 1.08:1, 2440 x 2268 pixel 426 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, OLED, Cover screen: 6.31 inches, 2,484 x 1,116 pixels, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash, 1024 GB 
, 932 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, dual gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum, OTG, Miracast, IR blaster
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.3, GSM: 850/900/1800/1900MHz, WCDMA: 1/2/4/5/6/8/19, LTE FDD: 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/17/18/19/20/25/26/28/30/32/66/71, LTE TDD: 38/39/40/41/46/48, 5G: n1/2/3/5/7/8/12/20/25/28/30/38/40/41/66/71/75/77/78, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 5.9 x 153.4 x 143.1
Battery
4805 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix (f/1.7, 24mm, 1.12µm) + 64 MP (3x optical zoom, f/2.6, 70mm, 1/2", 0.7µm) + 48 MP (f/2.2, 14mm, 1/2", 0.8µm), camera2 API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix (f/2.2, 20mm, 0.7µm) + 32MP (f/2.4, 22mm, 1/3.14", 0.7µm)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: OnScreen, case, charger, USB cable, info material, ColorOS 13.2, 12 Months Warranty, widevine L1, GNSS: Beidou: B1I + B1C + B2a; GPS: L1 + L5; GLONASS: G1; Galileo: E1 + E5a; QZSS: L1 + L5, SAR value:0.99W/​kg Head, 1.12W/​kg Body, BT Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptxHD, LDAC, LHDC, fanless
Weight
239 g, Power Supply: 102 g
Price
1800 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
88.3 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2023
Oppo Find N3
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740
239 g1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash7.82"2440x2268
87.3 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2023
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740
259 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash8.03"2160x1916
89.1 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2023
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740
253 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash7.60"2176x1812
84.7 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2023
Google Pixel Fold
Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7
283 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash7.60"2208x1840
Oppo Find N3 的颜色选择
Oppo Find N3 的颜色选择

与 Find 2 的 18:9 外屏相比,这款手机的后继机型采用了不同的纵横比。Oppo Find N3 的 6.31 英寸封面显示屏采用 20:9 长宽比,因此手机折叠打开时显得更加方正。柔性面板由特殊的肖特UTG玻璃保护,前面板安装了未命名的纳米水晶玻璃。7.82 英寸面板的屏占比高达 89.8%。

由于 Oppo 手机安装了警报滑块,因此它与其公司兄弟 OnePlus Open 的相似之处变得相当明显。相比之下 三星Galaxy Z Fold5相比,Find N3 的 IPX4 防护等级并不高。这意味着不能将手机浸入水中。反过来,这款可折叠的 Oppo 智能手机要纤薄得多,厚度不到 12 毫米。

它的制造质量非常出色,折叠打开铰链就能显示出它的高端特性。不过,竞争产品(如Galaxy Z Fold5)在超过 90 度时感觉更稳定一些。

Oppo Find N3 智能手机评测
Oppo Find N3 智能手机评测
Oppo Find N3 智能手机评测
Oppo Find N3 智能手机评测
Oppo Find N3 智能手机评测

尺寸比较

161.2 mm 143.3 mm 5.3 mm 259 g158.7 mm 139.7 mm 6.05 mm 283 g154.9 mm 129.9 mm 6.1 mm 253 g153.4 mm 143.1 mm 5.9 mm 239 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性 - 配备 NFC 功能的 Oppo Find N3

我们测试样品的 UFS-4.0 存储容量为 932 GB,内部存储无法扩展。Oppo Find N3 配备了 NFC、蓝牙 5.3、USB-OTG、Miracast 以及 USB 3.1(包括有线图像输出)。在我们使用连接的 M2 固态硬盘(三星 980 Pro)进行的复制测试中,手机的 USB 端口实现了 190 MB/s 的传输速率,明显低于该 USB 端口可能达到的速度。不过,可折叠手机支持 exFAT 文件系统和 NTFS,后者是微软系统的首选。

软件 - Oppo Find N3 配备Android 13

Oppo Find N3 预装了Android 13 和内部软件 ColorOS 13.2。在测试期间,操作系统的最新安全补丁是从 2023 年 9 月开始的,并将提供至少到 2028 年的更新。根据 OPPO 的说法,可折叠手机将在四代内接受Android 升级。

由于 Color OS 仅针对亚洲市场设计,Find N3 仅支持英语和中文两种语言,而且开箱即不支持谷歌 PlayStore。因此,您需要从外部资源下载。

Oppo Find N3 智能手机评测
Oppo Find N3 智能手机评测
Oppo Find N3 智能手机评测
Oppo Find N3 智能手机评测

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 WiFi 7 的 Oppo 智能手机

Find N3 配备了 WiFi 7,在我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 作为参考路由器进行的测试中,它在 5 GHz 频率范围内实现了非常高的传输速率 - 高达 1,800 MBit/s。在我们的测试中,低于 6 GHz 的连接是不可能的。在整个测试过程中,这些高数据传输速率也保持得相当稳定--至少在我们测量的接收数据中是如此。除了快速的 Wi-Fi 外,Oppo 手机还能快速连接 5G 移动网络。与缺少 28 和 32 频段的 LTE 频率相比,5G 频段无需做出任何妥协。

Networking
Oppo Find N3
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1733 (min: 1600) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1495 (min: 709) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
iperf3 receive AXE11000
911 (min: 867) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
994 (min: 919) MBit/s ∼66%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1867 (min: 1829) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1645 (min: 811) MBit/s ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
iperf3 receive AXE11000
886 (min: 764) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
924 (min: 456) MBit/s ∼62%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1631 (min: 1075) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1601 (min: 1511) MBit/s ∼95%
Google Pixel Fold
iperf3 receive AXE11000
920 (min: 888) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
950 (min: 481) MBit/s ∼64%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1714 (min: 856) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1684 (min: 1447) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
719 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
736 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1451 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1385 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼82%
095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1631 (1075-1812)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1598 (1511-1667)
Oppo Find N3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1731 (1600-1830)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø884 (764-954)
Oppo Find N3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1472 (709-1727)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø909 (456-950)
外部定位服务
外部定位服务
室内定位服务
室内定位服务

为了在实际使用中评估其定位服务,我们带着这款可折叠智能手机和 Garmin Venu 2 一起进行了一次自行车旅行,并进行了比较。在 GPS 测试中,Oppo Find N3 定位准确,这意味着我们在详细查看时只注意到了与实际路线的微小偏差。

Oppo Find N3 vs. Garmin Venu 2
Oppo Find N3 vs. Garmin Venu 2

电话功能和通话质量 - 支持 eSIM 的 Find N3

Oppo Find N3 智能手机评测

Oppo 的这款可折叠手机有两个可用的 nano SIM 卡插槽,这意味着它支持双卡双待以及 VoLTE、eSIM 和 WLAN 通话。在安静的环境中,通话质量相当不错,扬声器功能可以与通话另一端的人进行清晰的交流。

摄像头 - Oppo Find N3 配备索尼传感器

前置自拍摄像头
前置自拍摄像头
人像前置摄像头
人像前置摄像头
自拍内摄像头
自拍内摄像头
人像内摄影机
人像内摄影机

OPPO 为其可折叠手机提供的后置摄像头组合不必怯于可折叠手机的竞争对手。另一方面,其配备 OIS 的 4800 万像素主摄像头却无法与当前的摄像头精英相媲美。Oppo 手机缺少一些锐度,白平衡也不是最好的。索尼 LYT-T808 的堆栈式像素技术在弱光环境下的表现也不尽如人意。不过,它在黑暗环境中拍摄的照片仍处于不错的水平。在可控光照条件下,Find N3 显示出非常好的色彩描绘值。

手机的主摄像头借助一个 6400 万像素的长焦镜头和一个 4800 万像素的超广角摄像头进行扩展,长焦镜头可实现 3 倍无损变焦。这两个镜头的对焦都比较柔和,这意味着照片的基本清晰度可能会更好一些。特别是在低变焦水平(< 5 倍)下,我们本希望潜望镜镜头能有更好的表现。

0.6x
0.6x
1x
1x
2x
2x
3x
3x
6x
6x
10x
10x
120倍(最大值)
120倍(最大值)
Oppo Find N3 智能手机评测
Oppo Find N3 智能手机评测
Oppo Find N3 智能手机评测
Oppo Find N3 智能手机评测

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow lightUltra-wide angleZoom 5x
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
6.4 ∆E
2 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
1.1 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
2 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
4 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
4 ∆E
3 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
1.4 ∆E
4 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Find N3: 3.83 ∆E min: 1.13 - max: 8.75 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.2 ∆E
48.4 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
34.3 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
58.7 ∆E
47.6 ∆E
32 ∆E
34.4 ∆E
27.4 ∆E
59.1 ∆E
59.2 ∆E
29.1 ∆E
45.2 ∆E
30.5 ∆E
67.1 ∆E
38.7 ∆E
41.3 ∆E
70.4 ∆E
66.4 ∆E
50 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Find N3: 42.58 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 70.43 ∆E

配件和保修 - Oppo 智能手机附带一个电源供应器

Oppo Find N3 的电源
Oppo Find N3 的电源

Oppo Find N3 的买家可以期待广泛的送货范围。包装包括一个 65 瓦的模块化电源、一条数据/充电线、一个保护套、一根 SIM 卡针以及一些随附资料。我们的借用方深圳贸易公司还为我们提供了一个欧盟适配器,因为我们在进行测试时需要用到,但这并不属于手机的标准交货范围。

该设备的保修期为 12 个月。我们从深圳贸易公司购买的测试设备还附带了将 Find N3 寄往德国地址的选项,以备保修索赔之用。

输入设备和操作 - 配备指纹传感器的 Oppo Find N3

6.31 英寸外部显示屏和 7.82 英寸可折叠面板上的输入都能准确、灵敏地直接输入到触摸屏的边角。线性振动电机可提供良好的触觉反馈。开箱后,两个屏幕上都直接安装了保护膜。与 Z Fold5 相比,内部显示屏上的折痕几乎看不出来。 Galaxy Z Fold5相比,内屏的折痕几乎不明显,只有在日常使用中仔细观察才会发现。

手机的指纹传感器集成在开/关机键上,解锁快捷可靠。它还具有相当不安全的 2D 人脸识别功能,该功能基于使用前置和内置摄像头的 FaceUnlock 功能。该功能在白天也能正常工作。

Oppo Find N3 智能手机评测
Oppo Find N3 智能手机评测

显示屏 - Find N3 采用 OLED 显示屏

外部显示屏使用 RGGB 子像素矩阵,由一个红色、一个蓝色和两个绿色 LED 组成。
外部显示屏使用 RGGB 子像素矩阵,由一个红色、一个蓝色和两个绿色 LED 组成。
主面板还使用 RGGB 子像素矩阵,由一个红色、一个蓝色和两个绿色 LED 组成。
主面板还使用 RGGB 子像素矩阵,由一个红色、一个蓝色和两个绿色 LED 组成。

根据数据表,Find N3 内部的 7.82 英寸 LTPO 3.0 柔性显示屏分辨率为 2,440 x 2,268 像素,动态刷新率在 1 到 120 Hz 之间。不过,根据系统数据读取,除了运行某些应用程序(60 Hz)(如相机应用程序)时,屏幕的刷新率永久保持在 120 Hz。在我们的测量中,Oppo 手机的峰值亮度为 1,382 cd/m²(APL18)。在全白显示屏上,我们测得的亮度要低约 100 cd/m²。

它的 6.31 英寸前面板刷新率为 10 至 120 Hz(制造商规格),但亮度却无法达到主屏幕的 1,077 cd/m²(白色显示屏)和 1,275 cd/m²(APL18)。同样,系统输出的最低刷新率为 60 Hz。

由于两块屏幕都采用 OLED 技术,Oppo Find N3 也未能幸免 PWM 闪烁的问题。在亮度较低(< 50%)的情况下,内部显示屏的闪烁频率稳定在 240 Hz;如果面板亮度增加,我们测得的闪烁频率约为 460 至 480 Hz。我们在外部面板上测得的频率为 1,440 Hz。

1286
cd/m²
1283
cd/m²
1303
cd/m²
1286
cd/m²
1283
cd/m²
1288
cd/m²
1294
cd/m²
1289
cd/m²
1297
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1303 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1289.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.44 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 1283 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26
Oppo Find N3
OLED, 2440x2268, 7.8"
Oppo Find N3
OLED, 2484x1116, 6.3"
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
AMOLED, 2160x1916, 8"
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Dynamic AMOLED, 2176x1812, 7.6"
Google Pixel Fold
OLED, 2208x1840, 7.6"
Screen
-11%
18%
-35%
-7%
Brightness middle
1283
1077
-16%
1307
2%
1104
-14%
993
-23%
Brightness
1290
1083
-16%
1308
1%
1107
-14%
997
-23%
Brightness Distribution
98
96
-2%
96
-2%
97
-1%
94
-4%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.5
1
33%
3.1
-107%
1.4
7%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.4
1.7
50%
4.2
-24%
3.2
6%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2
1.5
25%
3
-50%
2.1
-5%
Gamma
2.26 97%
2.24 98%
2.01 109%
2.24 98%
CCT
6435 101%
6313 103%
6594 99%
6796 96%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列

我们使用 Calman 分析软件检查了内部面板的色彩校准(也支持杜比视界)。使用 "自然 "配置文件,sRGB 色彩空间得到了控制,并基本覆盖。据制造商称,Find N3 还支持更大的 DCI-P3 色彩空间。我们测量的 sRGB DeltaE 值显示,色彩(1.5)和灰度(2.0)略有偏差。

色彩准确度(配置文件:自然、暖色(最大值),目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩准确度(配置文件:自然、暖色(最大值),目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:自然、暖色(最大值),目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:自然、暖色(最大值),目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(配置文件:自然,暖色(最大值),目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(配置文件:自然,暖色(最大值),目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩饱和度(配置文件:自然、暖色(最大值),目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩饱和度(配置文件:自然、暖色(最大值),目标色彩空间:sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.603 ms rise
↘ 0.631 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
5.59 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.697 ms rise
↘ 3.895 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Oppo Find N3 具有良好的户外使用功能。由于屏幕亮度很高,即使在阳光直射的情况下,也能轻松阅读。其视角稳定性也很好,只有非常平的角度才会导致亮度下降。

Oppo Find N3 智能手机评测
Oppo Find N3 智能手机评测
Oppo Find N3 智能手机评测
内面板
Oppo Find N3 智能手机评测
内面板
Oppo Find N3 智能手机评测
外面板
Oppo Find N3 智能手机评测
外面板

性能 - 采用高通 SoC 的 Oppo 可折叠手机

Oppo Find N3 配备了 骁龙 8 第二代该芯片由台积电(TSMC)采用 4 纳米工艺制造。与采用高通 SoC 的竞争对手相比,我们的测试样品在某些基准测试中的数值较低,尤其是在 Geekbench 单核测试中。此外,我们在测试中使用的高性能模式默认情况下并没有激活,因此与高通 SoC 相比,小米 MIX FOLD 3 的性能差距并不大。 小米混合折叠 3的差距就更大了。

Find N3 在 GFXBench 图形测试中表现良好,但尽管刷新率为 120 Hz,屏幕上的数值也仅限于 60 fps。经验表明,这也适用于 PlayStore 中的游戏,因此 HFR 游戏可能无法超过 100 fps。可折叠手机在浏览器基准测试中的表现明显较差。

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
2084 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1999 Points +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1432 - 2104, n=17)
1926 Points +26%
Oppo Find N3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1534 Points
Google Pixel Fold
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
1480 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=165, last 2 years)
1478 Points -4%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
5525 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
5384 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (4255 - 5765, n=17)
5226 Points +5%
Oppo Find N3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
4987 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=165, last 2 years)
4126 Points -17%
Google Pixel Fold
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
3533 Points -29%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
16311 Points +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (11562 - 20394, n=24)
15817 Points +37%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
15761 Points +36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 26863, n=191, last 2 years)
13055 Points +13%
Google Pixel Fold
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
11617 Points 0%
Oppo Find N3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
11562 Points
CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1253 Points +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (778 - 1356, n=22)
1138 Points +7%
Oppo Find N3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1063 Points
Google Pixel Fold
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
895 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2044, n=160, last 2 years)
894 Points -16%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
Points -100%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
9730 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
9337 Points +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (7354 - 9730, n=22)
8794 Points +6%
Oppo Find N3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
8283 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=154, last 2 years)
6363 Points -23%
Google Pixel Fold
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
5704 Points -31%
System
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
14032 Points +10%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
13749 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (10786 - 15148, n=22)
13173 Points +3%
Oppo Find N3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
12736 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=154, last 2 years)
10203 Points -20%
Google Pixel Fold
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
8318 Points -35%
Memory
Oppo Find N3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
10626 Points
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
10136 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (6601 - 10834, n=22)
9479 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
8467 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=154, last 2 years)
6843 Points -36%
Google Pixel Fold
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
4556 Points -57%
Graphics
Oppo Find N3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
32334 Points
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
32002 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
31928 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (22837 - 32334, n=22)
27375 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=154, last 2 years)
17343 Points -46%
Google Pixel Fold
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
16243 Points -50%
Web
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
2032 Points +89%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
2009 Points +87%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1077 - 2044, n=22)
1777 Points +65%
Google Pixel Fold
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
1720 Points +60%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2145, n=154, last 2 years)
1569 Points +46%
Oppo Find N3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1077 Points
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Google Pixel Fold
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
37656 Points +138%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 75143, n=146, last 2 years)
17392 Points +10%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
15942 Points +1%
Oppo Find N3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
15837 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (11338 - 16880, n=21)
15142 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1267 Points -92%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Oppo Find N3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1607165 Points
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1562239 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1398472 - 1607558, n=12)
1539082 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=101, last 2 years)
1259783 Points -22%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3892 Points +7%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3800 Points +5%
Oppo Find N3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
3628 Points
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1711 Points -53%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3928 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3901 Points +6%
Oppo Find N3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
3687 Points
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1760 Points -52%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14671 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14599 Points +4%
Oppo Find N3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
13998 Points
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6849 Points -51%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6278 Points
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6120 Points +1%
Oppo Find N3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
6063 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5983 Points -1%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4973 Points -18%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
26316 Points +3%
Oppo Find N3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
25637 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24283 Points -5%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10577 Points -59%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
15182 Points +2%
Oppo Find N3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
14892 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14482 Points -3%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8459 Points -43%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Oppo Find N3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
502 fps +3%
Oppo Find N3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
488 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
329 fps -33%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
303 fps -38%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
92 fps +53%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
82 fps +37%
Oppo Find N3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Oppo Find N3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
346 fps
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
288 fps -17%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
164 fps -53%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps -74%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
113 fps +88%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
71 fps +18%
Oppo Find N3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
55 fps -8%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Oppo Find N3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
225 fps
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
213 fps -5%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
111 fps -51%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79 fps -65%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67 fps +26%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53 fps 0%
Oppo Find N3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
53 fps
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps -38%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
136 fps +6%
Oppo Find N3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
128 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
80 fps -37%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps -62%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
65 fps +51%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
63 fps +47%
Oppo Find N3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
43 fps
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28 fps -35%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Oppo Find N3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 fps
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66 fps -4%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59 fps -14%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
29 fps -58%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
80 fps +33%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
77 fps +28%
Oppo Find N3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
35 fps -42%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Oppo Find N3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
174 fps
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
153 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
125 fps -28%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64 fps -63%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
31 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
31 fps 0%
Oppo Find N3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
31 fps
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14 fps -55%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (Chrome 115)
188.652 Points +201%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (Chrome 118.0.05993.111)
157.504 Points +151%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (62.7 - 179.2, n=23)
133.1 Points +112%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=164, last 2 years)
121.7 Points +94%
Google Pixel Fold (Chrome 115)
106.562 Points +70%
Oppo Find N3 (Chrome 120)
62.738 Points
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (Chrome 115)
185 Points +561%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (Chrome 118.0.05993.111)
183 Points +554%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (28 - 183, n=22)
130.6 Points +366%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=155, last 2 years)
114.5 Points +309%
Google Pixel Fold (Chrome 115)
101 Points +261%
Oppo Find N3 (Chrome 120)
28 Points
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (Chrome 118.0.05993.111)
65418 Points +198%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (Chrome 115)
60317 Points +175%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (19870 - 65418, n=25)
45827 Points +109%
Google Pixel Fold (Chrome 115)
43817 Points +100%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)
37721 Points +72%
Oppo Find N3 (Chrome 120)
21928 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Oppo Find N3 (Chrome 120)
1762.4 ms *
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=163, last 2 years)
1551 ms * +12%
Google Pixel Fold (Chrome 115)
1074.5 ms * +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (602 - 1837, n=22)
1023 ms * +42%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (Chrome 115)
693.3 ms * +61%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (Chrome 118.0.05993.111)
653.8 ms * +63%

* ... smaller is better

Oppo Find N3Xiaomi Mix Fold 3Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Google Pixel FoldAverage 1 TB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
7%
-2%
-50%
16%
-37%
Sequential Read 256KB
3098.47
3572.73
15%
4384.43
42%
1606.37
-48%
Sequential Write 256KB
2863.35
2897.27
1%
2449.23
-14%
1169.32
-59%
Random Read 4KB
351.92
389.81
11%
459.94
31%
219.11
-38%
402 ?(349 - 441, n=9)
14%
Random Write 4KB
505.81
506.41
0%
161.39
-68%
238.72
-53%
579 ?(431 - 753, n=9)
14%

排放 - Oppo Find N3 容易过热

温度

在我们的测量过程中,Oppo Find N3 的表面温度可能较低,但由于过热,它在满负荷(CPU + GPU)状态下很快就结束了 Burnout 测试,这意味着我们只能在 CPU 降低的条件下确定废热。3DMark 压力测试也因同样原因提前结束,我们无法收集结果。

Max. Load
 40.7 °C45 °C42.2 °C 
 40.9 °C44.6 °C42.9 °C 
 31.8 °C33.4 °C33.7 °C 
Maximum: 45 °C
Average: 39.5 °C
39.5 °C40.4 °C35.8 °C
37.1 °C41 °C43.7 °C
30.7 °C32.2 °C32.2 °C
Maximum: 43.7 °C
Average: 37 °C
Power Supply (max.)  25.4 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.7 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

发言人

Find N3 配有立体声扬声器,其音质具有均匀的中音和一丝低音。高音也很均衡,但超高音调明显下降。

如果您想从外部播放音乐,可以使用手机的有线 USB-C 端口,也可以使用蓝牙 5.3。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.639.62524.730.7312421.94024.624.95032.1356322248016.426.41002638.412519.84716015.657.620014.661.925011.1663158.264.840011.5645009.970.46308.469.280010.27110001172.9125013.473.2160012.171.420001270.6250012.373.5315012.472.140001370.4500013.165.9630013.865.3800013.767.1100001470.41250013.762.11600012.843.2SPL24.782.8N0.658.3median 12.8median 67.1Delta1.55.630.937.222.325.323.225.625.42731.137.82026.317.82217.531.217.340.41555.215.154.816.358.113.556.713.956.113.463.813.365.311.769.61471.91475.413.377.21379.613.577.414.378.513.479.414.778.413.674.914.171.91467.314.26413.85725.888.40.771.1median 14median 69.60.710.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOppo Find N3Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Oppo Find N3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - Oppo 智能手机充电迅速

耗电量

Oppo Find N3 的功耗值并不显眼,但它在闲置模式下的功耗并不是这款可折叠手机的优点。使用该设备附带的 65 瓦充电器,4,805 毫安时电池可在约 50 分钟内从空闲状态充满电。不支持无线充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.07 / 0.38 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.16 / 1.8 / 1.84 Watt
Load midlight 10.98 / 11.1 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Oppo Find N3
4805 mAh
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
4800 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
4400 mAh
Google Pixel Fold
4821 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
2%
33%
10%
10%
21%
Idle Minimum *
1.16
0.86
26%
0.55
53%
0.86
26%
1.036 ?(0.7 - 2.37, n=23)
11%
Idle Average *
1.8
1.05
42%
0.9
50%
1.7
6%
Idle Maximum *
1.84
1.07
42%
1
46%
1.8
2%
Load Average *
10.98
15.27
-39%
9.58
13%
9.1
17%
Load Maximum *
11.1
17.78
-60%
10.74
3%
11.06
-0%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011121314Tooltip
Oppo Find N3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.78 (1.136-10.9)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.31 (0.866-14.4)
Oppo Find N3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.301 (1.222-1.74)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.773 (0.702-0.896)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Oppo Find N3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.89 (5.72-10.3)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.31 (8.17-10.8)
Oppo Find N3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.301 (1.222-1.74)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.773 (0.702-0.896)

运行时间

在我们进行的 WLAN 测试中,将显示屏亮度调整为 150 cd/m2,Oppo 手机及其 7.82 英寸柔性显示屏的运行时间接近 14.5 小时。Find N3 的外屏较小,在 947 分钟后即告耗尽。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 120)
14h 21min
Oppo Find N3
4805 mAh
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
4800 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
4400 mAh
Google Pixel Fold
4821 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
861
923
7%
763
-11%
651
-24%

Pros

+ 高品质外壳
+ 明亮的可折叠 OLED 面板,折痕不明显
+ 运行时间长
+ 功能丰富

Cons

- 摄像头略令人失望
- 容易过热
- 只能在某些国家进口
- 无线缆充电

关于 Oppo Find N3 折叠机的评价

Oppo Find N3 评测。测试设备由 TradingShenzhen 提供。
Oppo Find N3 评测。测试设备由 TradingShenzhen 提供。

Oppo Find N3 是一款成功的可折叠手机,与顶级手机相比 Galaxy Z Fold5相比,它没有明显的折痕。在日常使用中,这款可折叠智能手机的柔性 OLED 显示屏还拥有精确的校准,而且亮度超高。有点遗憾的是,为了更加 "主流",Oppo 改变了前代产品的屏幕比例,新机型采用了 20:9 的外置显示屏。因此,它失去了独特的卖点。主显示屏相当方正的纵横比所带来的附加值完全取决于你的个人使用习惯。

Oppo Find N3 是一款非常适合可折叠手机爱好者的智能手机。

如果您受到 Find N3 的进口限制(软件、保修等)的影响,那么 OnePlus Open可能是您更好的选择。这是步步高这款智能手机的全球版本。不过 Honor Magic V2小米混合折叠 3也可能是令人兴奋的替代品,因为它们的机身更薄一些。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和供应情况

Oppo Find N3 在亚马逊上以进口设备的形式出售,售价为 1,249 美元。

Oppo Find N3 - 12/20/2023 v7 (old)
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
88%
Keyboard
70 / 75 → 93%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
68 / 70 → 96%
Weight
87%
Battery
90%
Display
93%
Games Performance
60 / 64 → 94%
Application Performance
96 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
79%
Noise
100%
Audio
87 / 90 → 97%
Camera
73%
Average
84%
88%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Oppo Find N3 智能手机评测--没有恼人折痕的高端可折叠手机 [Oneplus Open] (简体中文)
Marcus Herbrich, 2023-12-24 (Update: 2023-12-24)