Oppo Find N3 智能手机评测--没有恼人折痕的高端可折叠手机 [Oneplus Open] (简体中文)
Oppo Find N3 的构造与其姊妹机型 OnePlus Open 完全相同。 OnePlus Open- 是一款可折叠的高端智能手机,但该版本主要面向亚洲市场。因此,Oppo 可折叠手机不会在美国正式发布,只能进口。目前在网上可以买到这款手机,售价约为 1,250 美元。
Oppo Find N2 的继任者主要关注相机质量。它的主镜头(包括哈苏品牌)采用了全新的 1/1.43 英寸索尼 Lytia-T808 传感器和堆叠像素技术。从理论上讲,这对一款可折叠智能手机来说是相当有前途的。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88.3 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2023 | Oppo Find N3 SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740 | 239 g | 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash | 7.82" | 2440x2268 | |
87.3 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2023 | Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740 | 259 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 8.03" | 2160x1916 | |
89.1 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2023 | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740 | 253 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 7.60" | 2176x1812 | |
84.7 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2023 | Google Pixel Fold Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7 | 283 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 7.60" | 2208x1840 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 具备 IP 保护等级的 Oppo Find N3
与 Find 2 的 18:9 外屏相比,这款手机的后继机型采用了不同的纵横比。Oppo Find N3 的 6.31 英寸封面显示屏采用 20:9 长宽比,因此手机折叠打开时显得更加方正。柔性面板由特殊的肖特UTG玻璃保护,前面板安装了未命名的纳米水晶玻璃。7.82 英寸面板的屏占比高达 89.8%。
由于 Oppo 手机安装了警报滑块,因此它与其公司兄弟 OnePlus Open 的相似之处变得相当明显。相比之下 三星Galaxy Z Fold5相比,Find N3 的 IPX4 防护等级并不高。这意味着不能将手机浸入水中。反过来,这款可折叠的 Oppo 智能手机要纤薄得多,厚度不到 12 毫米。
它的制造质量非常出色,折叠打开铰链就能显示出它的高端特性。不过,竞争产品(如Galaxy Z Fold5)在超过 90 度时感觉更稳定一些。
连接性 - 配备 NFC 功能的 Oppo Find N3
我们测试样品的 UFS-4.0 存储容量为 932 GB,内部存储无法扩展。Oppo Find N3 配备了 NFC、蓝牙 5.3、USB-OTG、Miracast 以及 USB 3.1(包括有线图像输出)。在我们使用连接的 M2 固态硬盘(三星 980 Pro)进行的复制测试中,手机的 USB 端口实现了 190 MB/s 的传输速率,明显低于该 USB 端口可能达到的速度。不过,可折叠手机支持 exFAT 文件系统和 NTFS,后者是微软系统的首选。
软件 - Oppo Find N3 配备Android 13
Oppo Find N3 预装了Android 13 和内部软件 ColorOS 13.2。在测试期间,操作系统的最新安全补丁是从 2023 年 9 月开始的,并将提供至少到 2028 年的更新。根据 OPPO 的说法,可折叠手机将在四代内接受Android 升级。
由于 Color OS 仅针对亚洲市场设计,Find N3 仅支持英语和中文两种语言,而且开箱即不支持谷歌 PlayStore。因此,您需要从外部资源下载。
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 WiFi 7 的 Oppo 智能手机
Find N3 配备了 WiFi 7,在我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 作为参考路由器进行的测试中,它在 5 GHz 频率范围内实现了非常高的传输速率 - 高达 1,800 MBit/s。在我们的测试中,低于 6 GHz 的连接是不可能的。在整个测试过程中,这些高数据传输速率也保持得相当稳定--至少在我们测量的接收数据中是如此。除了快速的 Wi-Fi 外,Oppo 手机还能快速连接 5G 移动网络。与缺少 28 和 32 频段的 LTE 频率相比,5G 频段无需做出任何妥协。
Networking | |
Oppo Find N3 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Google Pixel Fold | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Average of class Smartphone | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
为了在实际使用中评估其定位服务,我们带着这款可折叠智能手机和 Garmin Venu 2 一起进行了一次自行车旅行,并进行了比较。在 GPS 测试中,Oppo Find N3 定位准确,这意味着我们在详细查看时只注意到了与实际路线的微小偏差。
电话功能和通话质量 - 支持 eSIM 的 Find N3
Oppo 的这款可折叠手机有两个可用的 nano SIM 卡插槽,这意味着它支持双卡双待以及 VoLTE、eSIM 和 WLAN 通话。在安静的环境中,通话质量相当不错,扬声器功能可以与通话另一端的人进行清晰的交流。
摄像头 - Oppo Find N3 配备索尼传感器
OPPO 为其可折叠手机提供的后置摄像头组合不必怯于可折叠手机的竞争对手。另一方面,其配备 OIS 的 4800 万像素主摄像头却无法与当前的摄像头精英相媲美。Oppo 手机缺少一些锐度,白平衡也不是最好的。索尼 LYT-T808 的堆栈式像素技术在弱光环境下的表现也不尽如人意。不过,它在黑暗环境中拍摄的照片仍处于不错的水平。在可控光照条件下,Find N3 显示出非常好的色彩描绘值。
手机的主摄像头借助一个 6400 万像素的长焦镜头和一个 4800 万像素的超广角摄像头进行扩展,长焦镜头可实现 3 倍无损变焦。这两个镜头的对焦都比较柔和,这意味着照片的基本清晰度可能会更好一些。特别是在低变焦水平(< 5 倍)下,我们本希望潜望镜镜头能有更好的表现。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLow lightUltra-wide angleZoom 5x配件和保修 - Oppo 智能手机附带一个电源供应器
Oppo Find N3 的买家可以期待广泛的送货范围。包装包括一个 65 瓦的模块化电源、一条数据/充电线、一个保护套、一根 SIM 卡针以及一些随附资料。我们的借用方深圳贸易公司还为我们提供了一个欧盟适配器,因为我们在进行测试时需要用到,但这并不属于手机的标准交货范围。
该设备的保修期为 12 个月。我们从深圳贸易公司购买的测试设备还附带了将 Find N3 寄往德国地址的选项,以备保修索赔之用。
输入设备和操作 - 配备指纹传感器的 Oppo Find N3
6.31 英寸外部显示屏和 7.82 英寸可折叠面板上的输入都能准确、灵敏地直接输入到触摸屏的边角。线性振动电机可提供良好的触觉反馈。开箱后,两个屏幕上都直接安装了保护膜。与 Z Fold5 相比,内部显示屏上的折痕几乎看不出来。 Galaxy Z Fold5相比,内屏的折痕几乎不明显,只有在日常使用中仔细观察才会发现。
手机的指纹传感器集成在开/关机键上,解锁快捷可靠。它还具有相当不安全的 2D 人脸识别功能,该功能基于使用前置和内置摄像头的 FaceUnlock 功能。该功能在白天也能正常工作。
显示屏 - Find N3 采用 OLED 显示屏
根据数据表,Find N3 内部的 7.82 英寸 LTPO 3.0 柔性显示屏分辨率为 2,440 x 2,268 像素,动态刷新率在 1 到 120 Hz 之间。不过,根据系统数据读取,除了运行某些应用程序(60 Hz)(如相机应用程序)时,屏幕的刷新率永久保持在 120 Hz。在我们的测量中,Oppo 手机的峰值亮度为 1,382 cd/m²(APL18)。在全白显示屏上,我们测得的亮度要低约 100 cd/m²。
它的 6.31 英寸前面板刷新率为 10 至 120 Hz(制造商规格),但亮度却无法达到主屏幕的 1,077 cd/m²(白色显示屏)和 1,275 cd/m²(APL18)。同样,系统输出的最低刷新率为 60 Hz。
由于两块屏幕都采用 OLED 技术,Oppo Find N3 也未能幸免 PWM 闪烁的问题。在亮度较低(< 50%)的情况下,内部显示屏的闪烁频率稳定在 240 Hz;如果面板亮度增加,我们测得的闪烁频率约为 460 至 480 Hz。我们在外部面板上测得的频率为 1,440 Hz。
|
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 1283 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26
Oppo Find N3 OLED, 2440x2268, 7.8" | Oppo Find N3 OLED, 2484x1116, 6.3" | Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 AMOLED, 2160x1916, 8" | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Dynamic AMOLED, 2176x1812, 7.6" | Google Pixel Fold OLED, 2208x1840, 7.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -11% | 18% | -35% | -7% | |
Brightness middle | 1283 | 1077 -16% | 1307 2% | 1104 -14% | 993 -23% |
Brightness | 1290 | 1083 -16% | 1308 1% | 1107 -14% | 997 -23% |
Brightness Distribution | 98 | 96 -2% | 96 -2% | 97 -1% | 94 -4% |
Black Level * | |||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.5 | 1 33% | 3.1 -107% | 1.4 7% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.4 | 1.7 50% | 4.2 -24% | 3.2 6% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2 | 1.5 25% | 3 -50% | 2.1 -5% | |
Gamma | 2.26 97% | 2.24 98% | 2.01 109% | 2.24 98% | |
CCT | 6435 101% | 6313 103% | 6594 99% | 6796 96% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列
我们使用 Calman 分析软件检查了内部面板的色彩校准(也支持杜比视界)。使用 "自然 "配置文件,sRGB 色彩空间得到了控制,并基本覆盖。据制造商称,Find N3 还支持更大的 DCI-P3 色彩空间。我们测量的 sRGB DeltaE 值显示,色彩(1.5)和灰度(2.0)略有偏差。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1.23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.603 ms rise | |
↘ 0.631 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
5.59 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.697 ms rise | |
↘ 3.895 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Oppo Find N3 具有良好的户外使用功能。由于屏幕亮度很高,即使在阳光直射的情况下,也能轻松阅读。其视角稳定性也很好,只有非常平的角度才会导致亮度下降。
性能 - 采用高通 SoC 的 Oppo 可折叠手机
Oppo Find N3 配备了 骁龙 8 第二代该芯片由台积电(TSMC)采用 4 纳米工艺制造。与采用高通 SoC 的竞争对手相比,我们的测试样品在某些基准测试中的数值较低,尤其是在 Geekbench 单核测试中。此外,我们在测试中使用的高性能模式默认情况下并没有激活,因此与高通 SoC 相比,小米 MIX FOLD 3 的性能差距并不大。 小米混合折叠 3的差距就更大了。
Find N3 在 GFXBench 图形测试中表现良好,但尽管刷新率为 120 Hz,屏幕上的数值也仅限于 60 fps。经验表明,这也适用于 PlayStore 中的游戏,因此 HFR 游戏可能无法超过 100 fps。可折叠手机在浏览器基准测试中的表现明显较差。
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
Google Pixel Fold | |
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 75143, n=146, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
Oppo Find N3 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (11338 - 16880, n=21) | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 |
Antutu v10 - Total Score | |
Oppo Find N3 | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (1398472 - 1607558, n=12) | |
Average of class Smartphone (142748 - 3015111, n=101, last 2 years) |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
Oppo Find N3 | |
Google Pixel Fold |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 | |
Oppo Find N3 | |
Google Pixel Fold |
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 | |
Oppo Find N3 | |
Google Pixel Fold |
3DMark / Wild Life Score | |
Google Pixel Fold | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
Oppo Find N3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 | |
Google Pixel Fold |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
Oppo Find N3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 | |
Google Pixel Fold |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
Oppo Find N3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 | |
Google Pixel Fold |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Google Pixel Fold | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
Oppo Find N3 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
Oppo Find N3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 | |
Google Pixel Fold |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 | |
Google Pixel Fold | |
Oppo Find N3 |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Oppo Find N3 | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 | |
Google Pixel Fold |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 | |
Oppo Find N3 | |
Google Pixel Fold |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Oppo Find N3 | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 | |
Google Pixel Fold |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 | |
Oppo Find N3 | |
Google Pixel Fold |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
Oppo Find N3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 | |
Google Pixel Fold |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
Oppo Find N3 | |
Google Pixel Fold |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Oppo Find N3 | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 | |
Google Pixel Fold |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 | |
Oppo Find N3 | |
Google Pixel Fold |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Oppo Find N3 | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 | |
Google Pixel Fold |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
Oppo Find N3 | |
Google Pixel Fold |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (Chrome 115) | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (Chrome 118.0.05993.111) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (62.7 - 179.2, n=23) | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=164, last 2 years) | |
Google Pixel Fold (Chrome 115) | |
Oppo Find N3 (Chrome 120) |
WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (Chrome 115) | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (Chrome 118.0.05993.111) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (28 - 183, n=22) | |
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=155, last 2 years) | |
Google Pixel Fold (Chrome 115) | |
Oppo Find N3 (Chrome 120) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (Chrome 118.0.05993.111) | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (Chrome 115) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (19870 - 65418, n=25) | |
Google Pixel Fold (Chrome 115) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years) | |
Oppo Find N3 (Chrome 120) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Oppo Find N3 (Chrome 120) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=163, last 2 years) | |
Google Pixel Fold (Chrome 115) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (602 - 1837, n=22) | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (Chrome 115) | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (Chrome 118.0.05993.111) |
* ... smaller is better
Oppo Find N3 | Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 | Google Pixel Fold | Average 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 7% | -2% | -50% | 16% | -37% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 3098.47 | 3572.73 15% | 4384.43 42% | 1606.37 -48% | 3597 ? 16% | 1867 ? -40% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 2863.35 | 2897.27 1% | 2449.23 -14% | 1169.32 -59% | 3399 ? 19% | 1451 ? -49% |
Random Read 4KB | 351.92 | 389.81 11% | 459.94 31% | 219.11 -38% | 402 ? 14% | 279 ? -21% |
Random Write 4KB | 505.81 | 506.41 0% | 161.39 -68% | 238.72 -53% | 579 ? 14% | 311 ? -39% |
排放 - Oppo Find N3 容易过热
温度
在我们的测量过程中,Oppo Find N3 的表面温度可能较低,但由于过热,它在满负荷(CPU + GPU)状态下很快就结束了 Burnout 测试,这意味着我们只能在 CPU 降低的条件下确定废热。3DMark 压力测试也因同样原因提前结束,我们无法收集结果。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.7 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
发言人
Find N3 配有立体声扬声器,其音质具有均匀的中音和一丝低音。高音也很均衡,但超高音调明显下降。
如果您想从外部播放音乐,可以使用手机的有线 USB-C 端口,也可以使用蓝牙 5.3。
Oppo Find N3 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命 - Oppo 智能手机充电迅速
耗电量
Oppo Find N3 的功耗值并不显眼,但它在闲置模式下的功耗并不是这款可折叠手机的优点。使用该设备附带的 65 瓦充电器,4,805 毫安时电池可在约 50 分钟内从空闲状态充满电。不支持无线充电。
Off / Standby | 0.07 / 0.38 Watt |
Idle | 1.16 / 1.8 / 1.84 Watt |
Load |
10.98 / 11.1 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Oppo Find N3 4805 mAh | Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 4800 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 4400 mAh | Google Pixel Fold 4821 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 2% | 33% | 10% | 10% | 21% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.16 | 0.86 26% | 0.55 53% | 0.86 26% | 1.036 ? 11% | 0.885 ? 24% |
Idle Average * | 1.8 | 1.05 42% | 0.9 50% | 1.7 6% | 1.766 ? 2% | 1.451 ? 19% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.84 | 1.07 42% | 1 46% | 1.8 2% | 1.94 ? -5% | 1.608 ? 13% |
Load Average * | 10.98 | 15.27 -39% | 9.58 13% | 9.1 17% | 7.22 ? 34% | 6.55 ? 40% |
Load Maximum * | 11.1 | 17.78 -60% | 10.74 3% | 11.06 -0% | 10.4 ? 6% | 9.92 ? 11% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)
运行时间
在我们进行的 WLAN 测试中,将显示屏亮度调整为 150 cd/m2,Oppo 手机及其 7.82 英寸柔性显示屏的运行时间接近 14.5 小时。Find N3 的外屏较小,在 947 分钟后即告耗尽。
Oppo Find N3 4805 mAh | Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 4800 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 4400 mAh | Google Pixel Fold 4821 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | ||||
WiFi v1.3 | 861 | 923 7% | 763 -11% | 651 -24% |
Pros
Cons
关于 Oppo Find N3 折叠机的评价
Oppo Find N3 是一款成功的可折叠手机,与顶级手机相比 Galaxy Z Fold5相比,它没有明显的折痕。在日常使用中,这款可折叠智能手机的柔性 OLED 显示屏还拥有精确的校准,而且亮度超高。有点遗憾的是,为了更加 "主流",Oppo 改变了前代产品的屏幕比例,新机型采用了 20:9 的外置显示屏。因此,它失去了独特的卖点。主显示屏相当方正的纵横比所带来的附加值完全取决于你的个人使用习惯。
Oppo Find N3 是一款非常适合可折叠手机爱好者的智能手机。
如果您受到 Find N3 的进口限制(软件、保修等)的影响,那么 OnePlus Open可能是您更好的选择。这是步步高这款智能手机的全球版本。不过 Honor Magic V2和 小米混合折叠 3也可能是令人兴奋的替代品,因为它们的机身更薄一些。
价格和供应情况
Oppo Find N3 在亚马逊上以进口设备的形式出售,售价为 1,249 美元。
Oppo Find N3
- 12/20/2023 v7 (old)
Marcus Herbrich
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.