Oppo Find X5 Pro评测--配备哈苏相机的时尚智能手机
Oppo Find X5 Pro超越了Find X3 Pro,与前代产品差别不大。后盖的有机外观设计得以保留,手机变得更重。显微镜镜头已被取消,电池更大,其余的相机也得到了很多微调。但没有新的传感器。
Find X5 Pro目前在欧洲只提供单一内存型号,而且没有像在中国那样提供联发科Dimensity 9000。唯一可用的机型配备了高通骁龙8代。RRP为1299欧元,价格也明显上升。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
89.2 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2022 | Oppo Find X5 Pro SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730 | 221 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.70" | 3216x1440 | |
88.9 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2021 | Oppo Find X3 Pro SD 888 5G, Adreno 660 | 193 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.70" | 3216x1440 | |
89.4 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2022 | Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920 | 228 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.80" | 3088x1440 | |
90.5 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2021 | Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15, A15 GPU 5-Core | 238 g | 128 GB NVMe | 6.70" | 2778x1284 | |
87.6 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2022 | Xiaomi 12 Pro SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730 | 204 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.73" | 3200x1440 | |
87.9 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2022 | Motorola Edge 30 Pro SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730 | 196 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.70" | 2400x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
设计--一件由玻璃和陶瓷制成的高贵的服装
Oppo Find X5 Pro的名义厚度为8.5毫米(1/3英寸),但我们的测量结果是8.7毫米。在摄像头的最高点,它甚至达到了11.15毫米,结果是这款智能手机在平面上摇晃得相当厉害,即使带着保护套。Find X5 Pro有两种颜色可供选择--黑色和白色。
屏幕由康宁大猩猩Victus玻璃制成,而背面则由纳米陶瓷制成。Find X5 Pro相当重,但它的平衡性很好,其圆润的边缘使它能够舒适地放在你的手中。 然而,两边都是真正的指纹磁铁,手机背面简明的法律标记相当难看。 这可以处理得更优雅。
制造质量是令人信服的。 接合处紧密而均匀,扭转时的嘎吱声可以忽略不计。 SIM卡托盘的盖子与铝制框架齐平,具有相同的颜色,可以容纳两张纳米SIM卡。Find X5 Pro通过了IP68认证,使其既能防尘又能防水。
特点 - 没有惊喜
Oppo Find X5 Pro有一个快速的USB 3.2端口,它不仅为智能手机充电,还提供了连接OTG适配器的方式,实现了有线图像输出和多屏幕显示。
通知LED不包括在内,因为它已被永远在线的显示功能所取代;Oppo智能手机中也没有安装无线电接收器或音频插孔。不提供使用microSD卡的内存扩展。
软件 - FinX5 Pro,Android 12和ColorOS 12.1
OPPO配备了Android 12和内部用户界面ColorOS 12.1。OPPO提到两年的更新和另外第三年的安全补丁,计划每月推出。
OPPO预装了一些第三方应用程序,包括亚马逊、Facebook、TikTok和AliExpress等等。不过,这些都可以轻松卸载。此外,这款智能手机的显示屏可以通过其多屏支持功能在Windows PC上进行镜像。它可以从那里完全操作,包括通过拖放进行数据传输。虽然该程序本身只有英文版本,但它可以完美运行。
通信和GNSS - 追踪效果一般,没有Wi-Fi 6E
Oppo Find X5 Pro支持所有主要的蜂窝网络标准,包括5G Sub6,但不支持mmWave。5G-SA和NSA的频率覆盖范围都很广,所以应该不会有接收问题。
WLAN模块完全符合Wi-Fi 6规范(包括VHT160),但Oppo智能手机在与我们的参考路由器--华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000的测试中,将自己限制在80MHz的通道宽度。因此,传输率非常稳定,但确实仍有很大的改进空间。
Networking | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
Average of class Smartphone (34.8 - 1875, n=185, last 2 years) | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
Average of class Smartphone (40.5 - 1810, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Oppo Find X3 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max | |
Oppo Find X3 Pro | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
Average of class Smartphone (229 - 1902, n=77, last 2 years) | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
Average of class Smartphone (668 - 1864, n=77, last 2 years) |
在GNSS支持方面,Oppo Find X5 Pro几乎只限于单频操作,只有北斗支持两个频段。GPS信号锁定在户外发生的速度相当快,但需要一些时间才能精确地确定位置并使信号变得稳定。
这在我们的短途自行车骑行中也很明显,在骑行过程中,我们对Find X5 Pro和Garmin Venu 2智能手表进行了比较。有点令人惊讶的是,两款设备记录的距离长度相同,但智能手机有一种穿越围场和飞过桥梁的趋势。尽管如此,对于简单的导航来说,这应该是足够的。
功能和语音质量
与它的前辈Find X3 Pro一样,我们对X5 Pro在电话功能方面也比较满意。耳边的语音质量在两个方向都非常好,只有非常大的环境噪音会导致用户的声音轻微失真。否则,环境噪音几乎完全被过滤掉了。扬声器的声音很有冲击力,但声音有轻微的溅射质量,在更远的距离上混响很明显。
Oppo Find X5 Pro可以容纳两张nano SIM卡,或使用eSIM代替物理SIM。支持VoLTE和Wi-Fi通话,但没有内置的SIP账户管理。
摄像机 - 从四台到三台
Oppo Find X5 Pro的前置摄像头的技术规格没有改变;3200万像素和一个固定的对焦镜头。图像质量很好,应用程序提供了丰富的设置选项来定制自己的外观。不幸的是,视频录制仅限于全高清。
背面的主摄像头与去年的传感器相同,但显微镜镜头已被移除。然而,Oppo已经优化了大部分的相机设置。 使用了更多的玻璃镜头元件,图像稳定现在由三轴传感器移位和双轴OIS组成,作为锦上添花,Oppo已经引入了一个额外的成像NPU与MariSilicon X。
主摄像头拍摄的照片真的很棒,然而,在使用默认设置时,颜色有点冷。我们本以为颜色会稍微真实一些,特别是由于与哈苏的合作是专门针对这一功能的。 我们也喜欢它的图像稳定功能,可以消除相机抖动,即使是长焦距(高达20倍的数字放大)。然而,当使用5倍混合变焦时,图像可以做得更锐利一点。
超广角有很好的景深,在边缘部分只显示最小的色差,这确实是一个非常有说服力的发现。该镜头还可作为微距镜头使用。当以这种方式使用时,相机会自动切换。这并不是一个光学上的缺点,因为它使用的是与主相机镜头相同的传感器。然而,这一功能也可以在设置中停用。
在最好的情况下,Find X5 Pro可以以每秒60帧的速度进行超高清视频录制,但AI高光视频功能在HFR格式下无法使用。放大或缩小的设计很好,通过无级控制机制实现。拍摄时,这款智能手机出色的图像稳定功能给人留下了特别积极的印象。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
HauptkameraHauptkameraUltraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLow-Light在受控的照明条件下,Oppo Find X5 Pro非常准确地映射了我们的测试图,只在边缘部分出现了微弱的失真。在图像的中心,白平衡再次过冷。
在拍摄ColorChecker时,我们无法发现这个问题。恰恰相反,特别是红色和皮肤色调匹配得很好,对所有其他颜色的描绘都很真实。
配件和保修 - 包括SuperVOOC电源
Oppo Find X5 Pro附带一个模块化电源(最大80瓦,USB-A),一条USB线(Type-A到Type-C),一个硅胶保险套,一个SIM卡针和一个OTG适配器。
制造商在德国为这款智能手机提供24个月的保修。
输入设备和操作 - 带有光学指纹传感器的Oppo智能手机
Oppo Find X5 Pro有一个电容式触摸屏,可以同时检测多达10个触摸,并以240赫兹的采样率运行。在它上面实现了快速而可靠的输入。正如所交付的那样,显示屏上有一层保护膜,这在一定程度上抑制了在屏幕表面的滑行,而且对玻璃的切割也相当明显。
光学指纹传感器可靠地检测到存储的指纹,并以吸引人的速度解锁Find X5 Pro。另外,也可以选择更快,但也不安全的2D人脸识别。
我们对振动机制印象特别深刻,它的反馈安静而迅捷。除了单手手势导航外,还有其他一些可供选择的屏幕控制功能和手势模式。
显示屏 - Find X5 Pro有一个精确的LTPO OLED屏幕
Oppo Find X5 Pro的6.7英寸(17.02厘米)AMOLED显示屏与前代产品几乎没有任何区别。它使用高达120Hz的自适应刷新率,Oppo声称可以降低到10Hz。当系统将刷新率降低到低至1Hz时,我们感到意外但积极的惊喜。
当环境光传感器打开时,屏幕的亮度非常好,但竞争对手,如Galaxy S22 Ultra或小米12 Pro在这方面做得明显更好。考虑到光线和黑暗表面的均匀分布(APL50),OLED的亮度略高,达到816cd/m2。然而,宣传的1,300cd/m2甚至无法从这款智能手机中得到满足。
OLED的闪烁在179.7和361赫兹之间不规则地摆动。除了在可调的98%亮度设置以上的情况下,我们无法记录任何其他恒定的120Hz。
|
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 746 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
Oppo Find X5 Pro AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.7" | Oppo Find X3 Pro AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.7" | Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Dynamic AMOLED, 3088x1440, 6.8" | Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max OLED, 2778x1284, 6.7" | Xiaomi 12 Pro AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7" | Motorola Edge 30 Pro AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 0% | 9% | 23% | -13% | -13% | |
Brightness middle | 746 | 759 2% | 1077 44% | 1049 41% | 959 29% | 649 -13% |
Brightness | 744 | 776 4% | 1093 47% | 1060 42% | 977 31% | 649 -13% |
Brightness Distribution | 97 | 94 -3% | 97 0% | 98 1% | 96 -1% | 98 1% |
Black Level * | ||||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.9 | 0.8 11% | 1.2 -33% | 0.78 13% | 1.1 -22% | 1.18 -31% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 1.6 | 1.8 -13% | 2 -25% | 1.72 -8% | 3.1 -94% | 2.07 -29% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 1.6 -0% | 1.3 19% | 0.8 50% | 1.9 -19% | 1.5 6% |
Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.23 99% | 2.37 93% | 2.181 101% | 2.22 99% | 2.236 98% |
CCT | 6499 100% | 6512 100% | 6526 100% | 6559 99% | 6498 100% | 2538 256% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 361 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 361 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 361 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
用固定变焦水平和不同的亮度设置进行测量(Rigol MSO5102)。
当使用自然设置时,屏幕的色彩渲染非常接近真实生活。而且,如果你努力手动调整白平衡设置(见屏幕截图),最终你将在屏幕上获得近乎完美的色彩和灰度渲染。而为了实现这一点,只使用了较小的sRGB色彩空间模型。
如果你想要更大的DCI-P3光谱所提供的更深的颜色,你需要选择鲜艳模式。但与此同时,你也需要喜欢更强烈的饱和色彩和更冷的图像。 后者可以通过自然色彩显示设置进行补偿,使色温与环境照明保持一致。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1.389 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.793 ms rise | |
↘ 0.597 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
0.711 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.364 ms rise | |
↘ 0.348 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
在户外,Oppo Find X5给人留下了积极的印象。它可以聚集足够的亮度储备,以应对大多数照明条件。然而,如果能在显示屏上减少反射,那就更好了。
OPPO Find X5 Pro的镜头视角可以预见,非常好。只有在非常狭窄的视角下,人们才会注意到亮度的轻微降低。然而,只要稍微向下倾斜,就会产生绿色光晕效应。
性能 - 骁龙8代,而不是Dimensity 9000
欧洲版的Oppo Find X Pro完全基于高通芯片组和骁龙8代。 然而,在其原产国中国,有第二个版本,使用联发科Dimensity 9000。后者声称拥有额外的12GB LPDDR5内存。
移动基准测试显示,Oppo的这款机型落后于竞争对手。这表明SoC芯片组的冷却效果不理想,因为在日常使用中,正常的导航是很顺畅的。
虽然CPU性能位于预期范围内,但AI基准测试的结果却出乎意料地差。然而,Procyon人工智能基准测试显示,与其他配备骁龙8处理器的智能手机相比,结果稍好。
AImark - Score v2.x | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (1046 - 96317, n=14) | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro |
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (61568 - 81722, n=8) | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 74958, n=143, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G |
在GPU基准测试中,Adreno 730的性能很高,正如预期。然而,在其他一些GFX基准测试中,结果仍然低于图形处理器的潜在性能。这是冷却系统不足的一个早期迹象。
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max | |
Nubia RedMagic 7 | |
Realme GT 2 Pro | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
Nubia RedMagic 7 | |
Realme GT 2 Pro | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro |
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
Nubia RedMagic 7 | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
Realme GT 2 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro | |
Oppo Find X3 Pro |
3DMark / Wild Life Score | |
Nubia RedMagic 7 | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max | |
Realme GT 2 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro | |
Oppo Find X3 Pro |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | |
Nubia RedMagic 7 | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
Oppo Find X3 Pro | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | |
Nubia RedMagic 7 | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
Oppo Find X3 Pro |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | |
Oppo Find X3 Pro | |
Nubia RedMagic 7 | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max |
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited | |
Nubia RedMagic 7 | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
Oppo Find X3 Pro |
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics | |
Nubia RedMagic 7 | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
Oppo Find X3 Pro |
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics | |
Nubia RedMagic 7 | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
Oppo Find X3 Pro |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
Oppo Find X3 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max | |
Realme GT 2 Pro | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max | |
Realme GT 2 Pro | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
Oppo Find X3 Pro |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max | |
Realme GT 2 Pro | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
Oppo Find X3 Pro |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max | |
Realme GT 2 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro | |
Oppo Find X3 Pro |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max | |
Realme GT 2 Pro | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
Oppo Find X3 Pro |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max | |
Realme GT 2 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
Oppo Find X3 Pro |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max | |
Realme GT 2 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
Oppo Find X3 Pro |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max | |
Realme GT 2 Pro | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
Oppo Find X3 Pro |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro | |
Nubia RedMagic 7 | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max | |
Realme GT 2 Pro | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
Oppo Find X3 Pro |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Nubia RedMagic 7 | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro | |
Realme GT 2 Pro | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
Oppo Find X3 Pro |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro | |
Nubia RedMagic 7 | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max | |
Realme GT 2 Pro | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
Oppo Find X3 Pro |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Nubia RedMagic 7 | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro | |
Realme GT 2 Pro | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
Oppo Find X3 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G |
Oppo Find X5 Pro的浏览器性能令人印象深刻。在同类竞争对手中,它更多地处于中间位置,但我们认为,在日常使用中不太可能注意到这一点。
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15) | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chrome 99) | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (72.8 - 134.6, n=16) | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99) | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99) | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15) | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chrome 99) | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (121.9 - 237, n=11) | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99) | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97) | |
Oppo Find X3 Pro (Chrome 89) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15) | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chome 99) | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99) | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (64.4 - 129.3, n=16) | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15) | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chrome 99) | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (79 - 193, n=15) | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99) | |
Oppo Find X3 Pro (Chrome 89) | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99) | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15) | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chrome 99) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (27730 - 50626, n=17) | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99) | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97) | |
Oppo Find X3 Pro (Chrome 89) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Oppo Find X3 Pro (Chrome 89) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97) | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99) | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (814 - 1440, n=16) | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chrome 99) | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15) |
* ... smaller is better
这款Oppo智能手机建立在快速的UFS 3.1存储上,但与竞争对手相比,它的RAM写入速度较慢,就像它的前辈一样。
Oppo Find X5 Pro | Oppo Find X3 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | Xiaomi 12 Pro | Motorola Edge 30 Pro | Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 22% | 36% | 67% | 39% | 41% | 47% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 1410 | 1779 26% | 1653 17% | 1620 15% | 1832 30% | 1749 ? 24% | 1839 ? 30% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 894 | 759 -15% | 1074 20% | 1465 64% | 1028 15% | 1163 ? 30% | 1425 ? 59% |
Random Read 4KB | 183.7 | 273.3 49% | 322.3 75% | 324.9 77% | 277.7 51% | 286 ? 56% | 277 ? 51% |
Random Write 4KB | 210.4 | 267.1 27% | 273.1 30% | 448.9 113% | 339.5 61% | 319 ? 52% | 309 ? 47% |
游戏--很少超过60FPS
凭借Adreno 730,Oppo Find X5 Pro带来了一个非常强大的图形解决方案,使所有来自Google Play商店的应用程序可以使用最高清晰度播放,没有任何问题。我们用GameBench验证了这一点。
PUBG可以使用最高清晰度水平,以恒定的40 FPS运行。如果你把它降低到高清,你会得到高达60 FPS。然而,我们注意到,随着游戏时间的延长,性能会略有下降。 我们用《使命召唤》测试了这一点。事实证明,高帧率(HFR)游戏可以限制在60 FPS,尽管它们名义上支持90甚至120 FPS。荒野大镖客》就是这种情况,还有其他游戏。
环境--Oppo无法获得对Snapdragon 8的掌控权
温度
在任何时候,Oppo Find X5 Pro的表面温度都没有变得令人不快,即使在负载下,它也只是成片地变热。
压力测试就不那么轻松了。新的蒸气室散热器并没有获得对骁龙8代的掌握,而且经过一段时间,性能降低了约37%。这很烦人,但这是大多数制造商正在努力解决的问题。RedMagic 7在这个部门表现最好,但它也依赖主动冷却。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Wild Life Stress Test
3DMark | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro | |
Oppo Find X3 Pro | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
Motorola Edge 30 Pro | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro |
发言人
Oppo Find X5 Pro的两个扬声器可以非常响亮地播放,但听起来可能有点空洞,在无声的序列中可以听到噪音。然而,在较低的音量下,声音轮廓相当均匀,可以说是相当引人注目的。只是低音调的声音有些微弱。
可以通过USB端口连接一个插孔适配器来进行声音输出,但要使其发挥作用,你需要先在设置中激活。无线蓝牙5.2可以使用所有常见的音频编解码器(SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX自适应、aptX TWS 、LHDC和LDAC)。
Oppo Find X5 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命--Find X5 Pro 5G提供出色的运行时间
消耗功率
尽管Find X5 Pro可以将刷新率降至1赫兹,但在显示屏亮度最低的情况下,能耗却出奇地高。更重要的是,它在闲置时继续消耗正常的电力。在负载情况下,能耗很低,但这主要是由于SoC的节流,GFXBench在调整亮度(150cd/m²)水平下很好地说明了这一点。
OPPO智能手机在有线充电时可以达到80瓦,并在12分钟内达到50%的水平。无线充电的功率最高为50瓦。制造商的规格说明,用AirVOOC充电器给电池充满电应该只需要47分钟。
Off / Standby | 0.05 / 0.31 Watt |
Idle | 1.24 / 1.39 / 1.42 Watt |
Load |
3.58 / 6.99 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Oppo Find X5 Pro 5000 mAh | Oppo Find X3 Pro 4500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G 5000 mAh | Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 4352 mAh | Xiaomi 12 Pro 4600 mAh | Motorola Edge 30 Pro 4800 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -24% | -8% | 13% | -7% | -36% | -36% | -22% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.24 | 0.93 25% | 0.58 53% | 0.6 52% | 0.94 24% | 1.2 3% | 1.255 ? -1% | 0.894 ? 28% |
Idle Average * | 1.39 | 1.54 -11% | 0.71 49% | 1.5 -8% | 1.24 11% | 1.6 -15% | 2.02 ? -45% | 1.456 ? -5% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.42 | 1.69 -19% | 1.16 18% | 1.6 -13% | 1.34 6% | 2.5 -76% | 2.21 ? -56% | 1.616 ? -14% |
Load Average * | 3.58 | 6.38 -78% | 7.07 -97% | 3.5 2% | 5.7 -59% | 5.2 -45% | 5.49 ? -53% | 6.45 ? -80% |
Load Maximum * | 6.99 | 9.58 -37% | 11.32 -62% | 4.8 31% | 8.12 -16% | 10.4 -49% | 8.75 ? -25% | 9.8 ? -40% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)
电池寿命
Oppo Find X5 Pro使用两块串联的2500毫安时电池,这使它能够提供出色的电池寿命,只是在读取测试(空闲)中,显示亮度最小的运行时间很短。
这方面的迹象已经在早期的测试测量中被发现了。根据我们的观察,Find X5 Pro始终在1和120赫兹之间交替运行。由于在阅读稿中出现了大量的滚动,这个过程可能比竞争对手使用的过程更耗费能量。例如,小米12 Pro迅速切换到60赫兹,但更低的帧率在再过几秒钟后才会部署。
Oppo Find X5 Pro 5000 mAh | Oppo Find X3 Pro 4500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G 5000 mAh | Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 4352 mAh | Xiaomi 12 Pro 4600 mAh | Motorola Edge 30 Pro 4800 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -4% | 17% | 54% | 5% | 8% | |
Reader / Idle | 1269 | 1973 55% | 2846 124% | 2036 60% | 1985 56% | |
H.264 | 1142 | 1078 -6% | 1522 33% | 788 -31% | 1006 -12% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 788 | 757 -4% | 844 7% | 1067 35% | 766 -3% | 816 4% |
Load | 367 | 410 12% | 452 23% | 337 -8% | 306 -17% |
Pros
Cons
判决书
通过Find X5 Pro 5G,Oppo已经成功地提供了一个主要基于其相机的强大旗舰智能手机。额外的图像处理器,即MariSilicon X,以及Oppo与哈苏的合作项目,都强调了这一点。然而,它让人强烈地联想到另一款智能手机,即OnePlus 10 Pro由步步高电子公司制造。
Find X5 Pro具备我们对高端智能手机的一切期待:带有自适应刷新率的完美显示屏,良好的相机设置,长电池寿命,非常快的充电,IP68认证和光滑的设计。但仍有改进的余地。
Oppo Find X5 Pro以其全面的整体包装让人信服。但它也在一些特定领域显示出一些弱点。
我们的测试表明,Oppo智能手机的GPS既有些迟钝,也可以更准确。我们很怀念对Wi-Fi 6E的支持,此外,在这个价格范围内,应该包括一个超声波指纹传感器的事实。此外,我们的测试表明,屏幕的亮度比宣传的要低。
Find X5 Pro的良好替代品是三星Galaxy S22 Ultra以及小米12 Pro.对于更注重价格的买家来说,Edge 30 Pro也可能是一个令人兴奋的选择。
价格和可用性
Oppo Find X5 Pro的建议零售价为1049英镑/1299欧元。在所有知名的零售商,如亚马逊、数码港、MediaMarkt和Coolblue,它可能会以更低的价格提供。
Oppo Find X5 Pro
- 08/30/2022 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt