Notebookcheck Logo

Oukitel OT8 评测--电池续航时间长、支持 LTE 网络且空间充足的经济型平板电脑

优惠多多

Oukitel 的 OT8 证明,只需不到 200 欧元,就能在平板电脑中集成大量功能:它拥有充足的内存、Widevine L1、四个扬声器、可连接移动网络,并在 11 英寸显示屏后面隐藏了一块大电池。如果性能更好就好了
ARM Android Tablet
Oukitel OT8 (OT Series)
Processor
Unisoc T7200 8 x 1.6 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G57 MP1
Memory
6 GB 
Display
11.00 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 206 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB 
, 210 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio port, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, shared, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: gravity, hall
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.8 x 256.8 x 168.3
Battery
8800 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 18 Watt charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: four speakers, charger, USB cable, stylus, case, SIM tool, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
515 g
Price
180 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Bewertung
Datum
Modell
Gewicht
Laufwerk
Groesse
Aufloesung
Preis ab
81.3 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2024
Oukitel OT8
T7200, Mali-G57 MP1
515 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash11.00"1920x1200
84.2 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2024
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
480 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash11.00"1920x1200
83.5 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2024
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
SD 680, Adreno 610
481 g128 GB eMMC Flash11.00"1920x1200
79.3 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2024
Teclast T40 HD
T7200, Mali-G57 MP1
462 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash10.36"2000x1200

机箱和功能 - 金属机箱不时发出吱吱声

我们测试的 Oukitel OT8 采用灰色金属边框,背面也是同色金属材质。相机模块上有两个巨大的开口,并有闪亮的红色装饰。后面只有一个小得多的相机镜头和 LED 闪光灯。

设计看起来很现代,正面屏幕的边缘也不宽。这意味着你仍然可以舒适地将平板电脑握在手中,而不会经常不小心触碰到触摸屏。

外壳的稳定性相当一般:如果你稍稍扭动平板电脑,就会听到明显的咔嗒声,屏幕模块有时也会在边框下轻微移动。不过,就该价位而言,其硬度尚可,做工也不错。

这款平板电脑配置了 6GB 内存,与同价位平板电脑相比相当充裕。256 GB 的大容量存储空间在这个价位的平板电脑中也很少见。虽然没有 NFC 功能,但有两个 SIM 卡插槽,这意味着可以使用移动网络上网甚至打电话。

microSD 插槽与 SIM 卡共享一个插槽。在这里,您必须决定是使用双 SIM 卡还是 SIM 卡和 microSD 卡。总体而言,读卡器与我们的 Angelbird V60 参考卡配合使用时,在传输速率方面达到了同类产品的领先水平。不过 三星Galaxy Tab A9+显示了更高的数据传输速率。

尺寸比较

256.8 mm 168.3 mm 7.8 mm 515 g257.1 mm 168.7 mm 6.9 mm 480 g255.53 mm 167.08 mm 7.36 mm 481 g246 mm 156 mm 7.7 mm 462 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
  (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
47.18 MB/s +58%
Teclast T40 HD
  (Angelbird V60)
34.3 MB/s +15%
Average of class Tablet
  (7.61 - 101.6, n=59, last 2 years)
34.1 MB/s +14%
Oukitel OT8
  (Angelbird V60)
29.8 MB/s
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
  (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
28.92 MB/s -3%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Oukitel OT8 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø35.1 (22.3-43.5)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø36.8 (29.7-46.3)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø36.7 (21.9-44.3)
Teclast T40 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø37.5 (25.2-48.7)
Oukitel OT8 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø75 (35.3-84.9)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø78 (60.4-86.2)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø64.6 (36.3-77.6)
Teclast T40 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø71.2 (40.1-77.5)

通信、软件和操作 - 支持 LTE

该平板电脑提供的 WiFi 5 是最快的标准。在我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 参考路由器进行的测试中,Wi-Fi 的数据传输速率约为 300 - 350 MBit/s,而且相对稳定,即使在多次重复测试后也是如此。平板电脑无法完全利用千兆互联网连接,但 WLAN 的速度足以满足日常使用,无需大量下载。

LTE 网络也可用于上网,而且有多个频率可供选择。不过,如果要去更远的地方,尤其是美国或墨西哥,应检查平板电脑是否支持相应的频段,Oukitel 也在其网站上推荐了相应的频段。在我们的测试中,市区的接收效果不错,但还达不到高端智能手机的水平。

制造商在平板电脑上安装了Android 13,几乎没有对系统做任何改动。测试时的安全补丁是从 2023 年 11 月开始的,因此比较旧。没有预装第三方软件。幸运的是,该平板电脑支持谷歌的 DRM 标准 Widevine L1,因此可以不受分辨率限制地观看流媒体服务。

虽然触摸屏的最大采样率只有 120 赫兹,显示屏每秒最多只能显示 60 帧画面,但操作仍然相当流畅。系统性能较低,解锁时偶尔会出现等待时间,这也是一个比较大的障碍。

包装中还附带了一支手写笔,不过这只是被动型,即没有与设备进行蓝牙连接。使用它可以比用手指更精确地进行输入和导航。不过,没有压力级别识别功能,例如,在绘画和绘图应用程序中无法识别不同的笔触。

这款廉价平板电脑没有指纹传感器,但可以通过前置摄像头进行面部识别。该功能没有红外传感器,因此不像更昂贵的解决方案那样安全。不过,一旦存储了人脸,它就能可靠、快速地工作。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
369 (179min - 379max) MBit/s +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
369 (356min - 387max) MBit/s +4%
Teclast T40 HD
358 (343min - 369max) MBit/s +1%
Oukitel OT8
356 (334min - 368max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
340 (172min - 350max) MBit/s +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
307 (284min - 322max) MBit/s +1%
Teclast T40 HD
306 (249min - 318max) MBit/s +1%
Oukitel OT8
304 (242min - 317max) MBit/s

Legend

 
Oukitel OT8 Unisoc T7200, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Teclast T40 HD Unisoc T7200, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Oukitel OT8; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø304 (242-317)
Oukitel OT8; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø356 (334-368)

摄像头 - 自拍摄像头能拍出不错的照片

前置摄像头拍摄的照片
前置摄像头拍摄的照片

平板电脑背面有一个 1300 万像素的摄像头。它拍摄的照片并不十分细腻,清晰度也不高。随着光照强度的减弱,暗处的细节会越来越模糊,而其余光源则会变得更加清晰。

视频最高可录制 1080p 和 30 fps。自动对焦有时需要很长时间才能适应不断变化的环境。曝光补偿也不是最快的。总的来说,视频的色彩不是很丰富,很快就会出现模糊和不美观的情况,尤其是在光线不是很好的情况下。

自拍摄像头隐藏在正面屏幕上方的边框中。拍摄出来的照片可以使用,但放大后很快就会发现照片上有粗糙的颗粒。除此之外,细节还原还算不错。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow Light
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
7.3 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
3 ∆E
1.1 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
5 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
0 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
7 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Oukitel OT8: 6.08 ∆E min: 0 - max: 14.35 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.4 ∆E
54.5 ∆E
38.8 ∆E
35.6 ∆E
43.7 ∆E
63.7 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
43.4 ∆E
27.6 ∆E
66.3 ∆E
64.5 ∆E
29.8 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
37.2 ∆E
77.2 ∆E
43.5 ∆E
44.4 ∆E
93 ∆E
71 ∆E
52 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Oukitel OT8: 46.86 ∆E min: 12.64 - max: 92.98 ∆E

显示屏 - 不太亮

该机采用 11 英寸显示屏,全高清分辨率略微扩大为 16:10 格式,屏幕尺寸与同价位平板电脑相当。不过,最大亮度不到 400 cd/m²,这使得该设备不如三星或小米。

只要在室内,这通常不是大问题,但在花园或室外的咖啡馆,显示屏上的反光会让人难以看清屏幕内容。

即使在亮度很低的情况下,我们也没有发现 PWM 闪烁。在使用分光光度计和 CalMAN 软件进行的测试中,我们发现显示屏有明显的偏蓝现象,尤其是明亮的蓝色和绿色色调失真严重。总的来说,色彩显得有些暗淡。

358
cd/m²
349
cd/m²
378
cd/m²
388
cd/m²
390
cd/m²
384
cd/m²
371
cd/m²
368
cd/m²
395
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 395 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 375.7 cd/m² Minimum: 9.6 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 390 cd/m²
Contrast: 1500:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.19 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 7.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.244
Oukitel OT8
IPS, 1920x1200, 11"
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 11"
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 11"
Teclast T40 HD
IPS, 2000x1200, 10.4"
Response Times
-16%
-3%
1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
42.2 ?(21.8, 20.4)
53.81 ?(24.04, 29.77)
-28%
47.92 ?(22.26, 25.66)
-14%
44 ?(26.2, 17.8)
-4%
Response Time Black / White *
29 ?(14.4, 14.6)
29.92 ?(13.96, 15.96)
-3%
26.38 ?(11.47, 14.91)
9%
27.4 ?(11.8, 15.6)
6%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-3%
24%
-22%
Brightness middle
390
493
26%
473
21%
367
-6%
Brightness
376
460
22%
449
19%
346
-8%
Brightness Distribution
88
90
2%
85
-3%
90
2%
Black Level *
0.26
0.35
-35%
0.28
-8%
0.4
-54%
Contrast
1500
1409
-6%
1689
13%
918
-39%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.19
6
-16%
3
42%
6.54
-26%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
11.19
11.7
-5%
6
46%
14.53
-30%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
7.6
8.2
-8%
2.7
64%
8.7
-14%
Gamma
2.244 98%
2.21 100%
2.27 97%
2.169 101%
CCT
8625 75%
9131 71%
6589 99%
7952 82%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-10% / -5%
11% / 19%
-11% / -17%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14.4 ms rise
↘ 14.6 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 75 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21.8 ms rise
↘ 20.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN 色彩精度
卡尔曼色彩空间 sRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间 sRGB
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 饱和度

性能、排放和电池寿命 - 最好能有更大的功率

产品 Unisoc T606Unisoc T606 并不是众所周知的性能冠军,通常用于价格非常低廉的手机和平板电脑。这意味着 Oukitel OT8 通常只能排在比较领域的末尾。图形性能也很低,因此游戏玩家应该另寻他处。

另一方面,内存的速度却出人意料地快:制造商采用了 UFS 2.2 闪存,许多中端手机也采用了这种技术,因此平板电脑的性能明显优于对比设备。由于处理器速度较慢,因此也无法实现快速加载,但快速的内置内存至少可以稍稍弥补不足。

在长时间负载的情况下,机壳表面几乎不会出现明显的发热现象,3DMark 压力测试也显示其性能保持在非常稳定的水平。

平板电脑有四个扬声器,音量相当大。整体听起来也不错,甚至可以听到一些中低音。外部音频设备也可通过 3.5 毫米插孔或蓝牙 5.0 连接。无线音频传输还支持 aptX HD 和 LDAC 这两种更高质量的编解码器。

电池容量为 8800 毫安时,容量非常大,在我们的 WLAN 测试中也达到了 18 小时以上的良好运行时间。这意味着在雨天使用 Oukitel OT8 时无需充电。如果平板电脑确实需要插电,可以使用高达 18 瓦的功率充电;充满电大约需要 4 个小时。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (140 - 1887, n=71, last 2 years)
707 Points +133%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
693 Points +129%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
384 Points +27%
Teclast T40 HD
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
309 Points +2%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (273 - 313, n=19)
306 Points +1%
Oukitel OT8
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
303 Points
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (312 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)
2496 Points +98%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1768 Points +40%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1684 Points +34%
Teclast T40 HD
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
1324 Points +5%
Oukitel OT8
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
1260 Points
Average Unisoc T7200
  (708 - 1324, n=19)
1206 Points -4%
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (185 - 3715, n=68, last 2 years)
1093 Points +195%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
919 Points +148%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
413 Points +11%
Teclast T40 HD
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
378 Points +2%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (368 - 380, n=11)
375 Points +1%
Oukitel OT8
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
371 Points
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (493 - 14690, n=68, last 2 years)
3518 Points +165%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1993 Points +50%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1439 Points +8%
Teclast T40 HD
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
1403 Points +6%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (1285 - 1482, n=11)
1364 Points +3%
Oukitel OT8
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
1327 Points
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
10550 Points +53%
Average of class Tablet
  (3195 - 20841, n=73, last 2 years)
9812 Points +42%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (6637 - 8303, n=19)
7338 Points +6%
Teclast T40 HD
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
7155 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
7068 Points +2%
Oukitel OT8
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
6908 Points
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2942 Points +715%
Average of class Tablet
  (361 - 14235, n=47, last 2 years)
2050 Points +468%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1441 Points +299%
Teclast T40 HD
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
952 Points +164%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (361 - 974, n=18)
910 Points +152%
Oukitel OT8
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
361 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2825 Points +874%
Average of class Tablet
  (290 - 24605, n=47, last 2 years)
2176 Points +650%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1273 Points +339%
Teclast T40 HD
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
807 Points +178%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (290 - 829, n=18)
772 Points +166%
Oukitel OT8
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
290 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3440 Points +40%
Average of class Tablet
  (858 - 5751, n=47, last 2 years)
2796 Points +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2681 Points +9%
Teclast T40 HD
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
2571 Points +5%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (2379 - 2577, n=18)
2499 Points +2%
Oukitel OT8
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
2454 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Average of class Tablet
  (267 - 17674, n=67, last 2 years)
4452 Points +361%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3075 Points +219%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1429 Points +48%
Teclast T40 HD
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
978 Points +1%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (959 - 989, n=18)
975 Points +1%
Oukitel OT8
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
965 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet
  (240 - 29325, n=67, last 2 years)
5806 Points +609%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2991 Points +265%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1309 Points +60%
Teclast T40 HD
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
829 Points +1%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (814 - 834, n=18)
825 Points +1%
Oukitel OT8
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
819 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Average of class Tablet
  (441 - 7451, n=67, last 2 years)
3620 Points +41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3409 Points +33%
Teclast T40 HD
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
2651 Points +3%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (2484 - 2697, n=18)
2625 Points +2%
Oukitel OT8
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
2563 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2105 Points -18%
Wild Life Score
Average of class Tablet
  (286 - 7933, n=60, last 2 years)
1743 Points +312%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1216 Points +187%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
589 Points +39%
Teclast T40 HD
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
424 Points 0%
Oukitel OT8
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
423 Points
Average Unisoc T7200
  (394 - 432, n=18)
416 Points -2%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average of class Tablet
  (289 - 32525, n=72, last 2 years)
4578 Points +993%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1206 Points +188%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
574 Points +37%
Teclast T40 HD
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
422 Points +1%
Oukitel OT8
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
419 Points
Average Unisoc T7200
  (392 - 424, n=18)
413 Points -1%
Wild Life Extreme
Average of class Tablet
  (75 - 8689, n=73, last 2 years)
1303 Points +1216%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
361 Points +265%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
123 Points +24%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (85 - 118, n=18)
107.3 Points +8%
Oukitel OT8
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
99 Points
Teclast T40 HD
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
85 Points -14%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Average of class Tablet
  (72 - 8889, n=71, last 2 years)
1543 Points +1428%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
354 Points +250%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
121 Points +20%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (99 - 121, n=15)
107.7 Points +7%
Teclast T40 HD
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
101 Points 0%
Oukitel OT8
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
101 Points
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet
  (3 - 120, n=78, last 2 years)
26.9 fps +427%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
21 fps +312%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
9 fps +76%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (5.1 - 11, n=18)
8.83 fps +73%
Teclast T40 HD
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
5.2 fps +2%
Oukitel OT8
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
5.1 fps
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet
  (2.5 - 340, n=78, last 2 years)
55 fps +919%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
22 fps +307%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
9.8 fps +81%
Teclast T40 HD
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
5.5 fps +2%
Oukitel OT8
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
5.4 fps
Average Unisoc T7200
  (1.9 - 5.5, n=18)
5.22 fps -3%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet
  (1.9 - 106.4, n=78, last 2 years)
18.6 fps +481%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
13 fps +306%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (0.85 - 7.3, n=18)
5.34 fps +67%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
5.3 fps +66%
Teclast T40 HD
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
3.3 fps +3%
Oukitel OT8
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
3.2 fps
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet
  (0.9 - 114.5, n=78, last 2 years)
21 fps +950%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
8.2 fps +310%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
3.3 fps +65%
Teclast T40 HD
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
2 fps 0%
Oukitel OT8
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
2 fps
Average Unisoc T7200
  (0.85 - 2.1, n=18)
1.925 fps -4%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet
  (0.4 - 55.1, n=76, last 2 years)
9.87 fps +1075%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3.6 fps +329%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1.4 fps +67%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (0.8 - 6.6, n=14)
1.253 fps +49%
Oukitel OT8
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
0.84 fps
Teclast T40 HD
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
0.83 fps -1%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
29301 Points +148%
Average of class Tablet
  (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years)
28653 Points +143%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
14279 Points +21%
Teclast T40 HD
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
12696 Points +8%
Oukitel OT8
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
11794 Points
Average Unisoc T7200
  (2228 - 13455, n=14)
11332 Points -4%
Oukitel OT8Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+Xiaomi Redmi Pad SETeclast T40 HDAverage 256 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-29%
-51%
-37%
14%
7%
Sequential Read 256KB
930
485.96
-48%
297.47
-68%
688.9
-26%
Sequential Write 256KB
606
476.37
-21%
228.97
-62%
188
-69%
Random Read 4KB
162.2
130.67
-19%
102.41
-37%
137
-16%
Random Write 4KB
224.7
162.9
-28%
146.92
-35%
143.8
-36%

温度

Max. Load
 30 °C32.6 °C31.1 °C 
 29.5 °C29.2 °C29 °C 
 29.6 °C27.9 °C27.6 °C 
Maximum: 32.6 °C
Average: 29.6 °C
28.9 °C29.2 °C29.5 °C
27.8 °C29 °C29 °C
27.3 °C27.4 °C27.9 °C
Maximum: 29.5 °C
Average: 28.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42.3 °C | Room Temperature 20.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.9 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.


3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

01234567Tooltip
Oukitel OT8 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.645 (0.595-0.693)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.16 (2.14-2.16)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.726 (0.72-0.741)
Teclast T40 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.623 (0.575-0.677)
Oukitel OT8 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.53 (2.5-2.54)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.26 (7.23-7.27)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.5 (3.49-3.5)
Teclast T40 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.54 (2.53-2.56)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.52 (3.52-3.53)

扬声器

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.236.12530.335.13124.123.14031.4315037.333.66325.923.28019.51910016.524.512513.732.416013.742.42009.245.72508.346.83156.753.9400761.75008.865.86308.368.68008.974.6100010.778.512508.776.316009.176.920009.773.2250010.669315011.367.940001273.3500012.977630013.775.9800014.464.41000015.370.3125001668.7160001749.3SPL23.986.1N0.565.6median 10.7median 68.6Delta2.710.63843.429.435.226.326.332.827.837.831.829.727.722.719.418.919.820.621.512.931.59.235.510.342.37.343.66.852.18.657.612.362.210.760.91165.58.762.58.764.99.263.910.258.111.46013.259.114.565.614.462.615.363.416.356.316.349.117.236.224.774.40.533.3median 11.4median 58.13.310.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOukitel OT8Teclast T40 HD
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Oukitel OT8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Teclast T40 HD audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Oukitel OT8
8800 mAh
1086 min
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
8000 mAh
1017 min -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
7040 mAh
920 min -15%
Teclast T40 HD
7200 mAh
902 min -17%
Average of class Tablet
  (319 - 1764, n=78, last 2 years)
816 min -25%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
18h 06min

Pros

+ 金属机身
+ 内存充足、速度快
+ 附带多种配件
+ 运行时间长
+ 支持 LTE
+ 扬声器音量大、音质好
+ 无 PWM

Cons

- 性能相当低
- 摄像头质量一般
- 更新供应不明确
- 相对较重
- 手写笔仅为被动式

结论 - Oukitel 平板电脑功能出色

回顾Oukitel OT8。测试设备由 Oukitel 提供。
回顾Oukitel OT8。测试设备由 Oukitel 提供。

Oukitel OT8 在 200 欧元以下的价格范围内有几个亮点:首先,它拥有超大、超快的大容量存储空间,并由 6 GB 内存提供支持。Android ,时尚的金属外壳,2 个 SIM 卡插槽支持移动网络。四个扬声器提供了良好的音效,电池的续航时间也很长。

不过,事实证明这款平板电脑在某些方面也令人眼花缭乱:例如,制造商声称有 30 GB 内存,但只能通过内部存储器中的 24 GB 交换文件来访问。不过,这样做相对较慢,对绝大多数用户来说可能没有必要。此外,随机附带的手写笔并不是我们从更昂贵的平板电脑上了解到的那种手写笔,而只是一种支持更精确输入的辅助工具。

除了超快的内存外,平板电脑的性能显然有限,只能满足基本的日常使用。摄像头也是临时拼凑的,只有前置自拍摄像头的效果尚可。

Oukitel OT8 功能丰富,运行时间长。不过,这款平板电脑的性能储备并不多。

三星 三星Galaxy Tab A9+速度更快,还能保证 4 年更新。不过,它的内存较小。

价格和供应情况

Oukitel OT8 可直接从制造商处购买,价格不到 160 欧元。

亚马逊网站(amazon.de)上,这款平板电脑的测试价格为 199 欧元,但您可以兑换一张 20 欧元的代金券。

Oukitel OT8 - 02/25/2024 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
81 / 98 → 82%
Keyboard
65 / 80 → 82%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
46 / 70 → 65%
Weight
83 / 40-88 → 89%
Battery
92%
Display
81%
Games Performance
9 / 78 → 12%
Application Performance
56 / 92 → 61%
Temperature
96%
Noise
100%
Audio
70 / 91 → 77%
Camera
48 / 85 → 56%
Average
71%
81%
Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Oukitel OT8 评测--电池续航时间长、支持 LTE 网络且空间充足的经济型平板电脑
Florian Schmitt, 2024-03-10 (Update: 2024-03-10)