三星Galaxy Tab A9+ 评测--90 赫兹平板电脑，4 年更新，别无所求

Name: Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Brand: Samsung

优点

在我们的测试中，11 英寸的Galaxy Tab A9+ 被证明是备受喜爱的Galaxy Tab A8 的继任者，速度更快，配置更好。这款平板电脑的起售价为 219.99 美元，配备了 90-Hz 显示屏、更大的存储空间、可选的 5G 技术，并首次配备了三星 DeX 技术。此外，该平板电脑的更新时间长达 4 年。该平板电脑将于 2 月份收到Android 14。

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 02/19/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Tablet Touchscreen

Galaxy Tab 系列是三星最便宜的平板电脑。其最新产品是 11 英寸Galaxy Tab A9+，它取代了 10.5 英寸的前代产品--Tab A8。 Galaxy Tab A8.它不仅拥有更大的屏幕尺寸，其丰富的功能也焕然一新。

配置骁龙 695 5G在三星Galaxy Tab A9+ 中运行，取代了速度较慢的 Unisoc T618.此外，这款平板电脑现在的起始存储容量为 64 GB，而不是 32 GB。对于这个价位的平板电脑来说，它的刷新率非常出色--以前是 60 Hz，现在是 90 Hz。Galaxy Tab A9+ 也是首款提供 5G 版本的Galaxy Tab A 机型。其较慢的 8.7 英寸姐妹机型 Galaxy Tab A9仅限于 LTE 和 60 Hz。

三星Galaxy Tab A9+ 的最小配置起价为 219.99 美元。它还推出了儿童版，配有保护套和触控笔，旨在创造一个安全、有趣的平板电脑环境。目前，你只能在某些国家买到这个版本。

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Galaxy Tab A9 Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 8 x 1.7 - 2.2 GHz, Kryo 660 Gold (2x Cortex-A78) / Silver (6x Cortex-A55)

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 619

Memory

4 GB

, LPDDR4X

Display

11.00 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 206 PPI, capacitive, TFT-LCD, WUXGA, 16 mio. colors, glossy: yes, HDR, 90 Hz

Storage

64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 64 GB

, 41.1 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm headset jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, compass, hall, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3, WiFi Direct, Samsung Quick Share

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 6.9 x 257.1 x 168.7

Battery

7040 mAh Lithium-Ion

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 13

Camera

Primary Camera: 8 MPix AF, video recording up to 1080p@30fps
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix video recording up to 1080p@30fps

Additional features

Speakers: quad speakers with Dolby Atmos support, Keyboard: virtual, USB-C cable, quick start guide, warranty information, One UI 5.1, 24 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

480 g

Price

249 Euro

Links

Samsung notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
84.2 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2024	Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ SD 695 5G, Adreno 619	480 g	6.9 mm	11.00"	1920x1200
81.7 % v7 ^(old)	11 / 2022	Honor Pad 8 SD 680, Adreno 610	520 g	6.9 mm	12.00"	2000x1200
83.5 % v7 ^(old)	01 / 2024	Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE SD 680, Adreno 610	481 g	7.36 mm	11.00"	1920x1200
81 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2022	Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 T618, Mali-G52 MP2	508 g	6.9 mm	10.50"	1920x1200
79.4 % v7 ^(old)	01 / 2024	Teclast M50 HD T7200, Mali-G57 MP1	435 g	8 mm	10.10"	1920x1200
81.5 % v7 ^(old)	09 / 2023	Telekom T Tablet Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2	490 g	7.8 mm	10.40"	2000x1200

外壳 -Galaxy Tab A9+ 铝质外壳

说到三星Galaxy Tab A9+ 的设计，与前代产品相比变化不大，这款 11 英寸的平板电脑依然采用美观大方、做工精良的铝制外壳，使设备具有很强的稳定性。对于这种尺寸的平板电脑来说，我们的 WiFi 版相当轻巧，重 480 克。

背面的金属表面只在靠近 800 万像素摄像头的高度才被打断。在那里，一条塑料条横跨 6.9 毫米平板电脑的整个宽度，无线天线隐藏在塑料条后面。5G 版的重量为 491 克，略高于我们的 WiFi 测试版。

Galaxy Tab A9+ 的边框厚度约为 0.9 厘米。这意味着你可以舒适地将平板电脑握在手中，同时避免意外激活触摸屏。三星平板电脑的屏占比高达 81%，比上一代产品（Galaxy Tab A8: 80%）的屏占比有进一步提高。

三星为Galaxy Tab A9+ 提供石墨色、银色和海军蓝三种颜色。这三种颜色都采用了磨砂后盖，可以很好地隐藏指纹痕迹。

尺寸比较

Honor Pad 8 Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Telekom T Tablet Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Teclast M50 HD DIN A5 ❌

连接性 - 存储容量高达 128 GB、支持 5G 网络的三星平板电脑

Galaxy Tab A9+ 采用了前代产品的许多连接功能。它的 WLAN 模块继续依赖 WiFi 5，支持 OTG 的 USB-C 端口仍为 USB 2.0 速度，这也意味着使用此连接无法进行有线图像输出。反过来，它也保留了 3.5 毫米音频接口和四个通过杜比 Atmos 认证的扬声器等功能。与三星 980 Pro 外置固态硬盘连接后，USB-C 端口的数据吞吐量达到 32.4 MByte/s，相当于传统的 USB 2.0 速度。

Galaxy Tab A9+ 最大的创新是在移动通信方面，因为它现在还可以首次选配 5G 版本。这意味着总共有四种平板电脑配置可供选择：

-Galaxy Tab A9+ Wi-Fi 64 GB：219.99 美元
-Galaxy Tab A9+ Wi-Fi 128 GB：269.99 美元
-Galaxy Tab A9+ 5G 64 GB：269.99 美元
-Galaxy Tab A9+ 5G 128 GB：269.99 美元

Galaxy Tab A9+ 的 microSD 卡插槽可接受最大 1 TB 的卡。不过，后者不能格式化为内部存储，因此很难安装大型游戏收藏--尤其是在 64 GB 配置上。此外，在我们的测试设备上，Android 13 和预装的应用程序占用了将近 23 GB 的空间，刚安装时只剩下不到 41 GB 的可用空间。

microSD 读卡器

与同价位的平板电脑相比，MicroSD 卡插槽的速度快于平均水平，仅略胜于 Galaxy Tab A8在我们的复制测试中达到了 47.2 MB/s 的峰值。当与我们的 Angelbird AV Pro V60 参考卡一起使用时，Galaxy Tab A9+ 在顺序读写方面也取得了良好且基本稳定的传输速率。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	49.18 MB/s +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	47.18 MB/s
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)	35.2 MB/s -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	28.92 MB/s -39%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	17.02 MB/s -64%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø36.8 (29.7-46.3)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø36.7 (21.9-44.3)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø78 (60.4-86.2)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø64.6 (36.3-77.6)

软件 - 首款配备 Samsung DeX 的Galaxy-A 平板电脑

Galaxy Tab A9+ 上运行的是三星内部用户界面，即 5.1 版 One UI。测试时，它基于Android 13，最新的Android 安全补丁是 2023 年 10 月的。Galaxy Tab A9+ 将迎来两代操作系统升级和 4 年的安全更新。

与它的 8.7 英寸姐妹机型不同，Tab A9 Galaxy Tab A9Galaxy Tab A9+ 还可以使用三星 DeX 界面，这在以前只有Galaxy Tab S 平板电脑才能使用。这可以将Galaxy Tab A9+ 切换到类似 PC 的桌面模式。使用 DeXm 的Galaxy Tab A9+ 可能不支持外接显示器，但仍可以使用鼠标和键盘舒适地操作平板电脑。

使用正常的 One-UI 视图时，鼠标和键盘也能正常工作，在分屏模式下可以同时打开 3 个应用程序，这与使用 DeX 时的情况相同。此外，你还可以在弹出窗口中打开应用程序，然后调整窗口的大小和位置。此外，还可以使用智能视图将内容镜像到智能电视等兼容的终端设备上。

三星通过 Samsung Knox 安全平台为平板电脑提供了许多安全功能。数据保护设置可以详细定义，内容可以在发送前进行加密。平板电脑还可以安全地连接到公共 WiFi 网络。数据流量会被加密，跟踪应用程序也会被阻止。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 -Galaxy Tab A9+ 配备 WiFi 5 和良好的 GPS 功能

三星Galaxy Tab A9+ 支持 IEEE 标准 802.11a/b/g/n/ac aka WiFi 5，这意味着它可以连接到 2.4 GHz 和 5 GHz 无线局域网。5G 版平板电脑还可以使用移动数据连接网络。

在我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 作为参考路由器进行的测试中，该平板电脑达到了 WiFi 5 的典型传输速率。它达到了 369 MBit/s 的峰值，并且在发送和接收时保持稳定。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Telekom T Tablet	371 (365^min - 371^max) MBit/s +9%
Honor Pad 8	345 (326^min - 357^max) MBit/s +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	340 (172^min - 350^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	325 (163^min - 328^max) MBit/s -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	307 (284^min - 322^max) MBit/s -10%
Teclast M50 HD	305 (259^min - 319^max) MBit/s -10%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Telekom T Tablet	372 (358^min - 381^max) MBit/s +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	369 (179^min - 379^max) MBit/s 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	369 (356^min - 387^max) MBit/s
Teclast M50 HD	358 (336^min - 370^max) MBit/s -3%
Honor Pad 8	357 (323^min - 366^max) MBit/s -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	349 (178^min - 357^max) MBit/s -5%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø333 (172-350)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø307 (284-322)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø369 (356-387)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø363 (179-379)

三星Galaxy Tab A9+ 使用单频 GPS、Glonass、Galileo 和北斗导航服务，因此在室外精确度可达 3 米以内。在运动状态下，其精确度对于这个价位的平板电脑来说仍然出奇地高。与 Garmin Venu 2 健身智能手表相比，三星平板电脑几乎同样精确地记录了我们骑车 10 公里的路线。因此，如果你想把Galaxy Tab A9+ 用作超大型导航设备，这款平板电脑不会给你任何不这样做的理由。

摄像头：自拍摄像头效果不错，主摄像头令人失望

Galaxy Tab A9+ 的自拍摄像头分辨率为 500 万像素，比 Galaxy Tab A9的前置摄像头（分辨率仅为 200 万像素）更胜一筹。在我们的测试中，它在光线条件良好的情况下也能拍出不错的自拍照，而且在激活人像模式后，拍摄对象的虚化效果也很不错。使用自拍摄像头和主摄像头可录制高达 30 fps 的全高清视频。

主摄像头具有 800 万像素分辨率和自动对焦功能。在日光下，它能拍摄出不错的照片，色彩表现也相当中性。遗憾的是，由于锐化过度，较小的细节往往会丢失，进而导致图像的这些部分显得有些模糊。

如果光线条件不再理想，主摄像头就会明显达到极限。我们在测试时遇到的多云天气也是这种情况，有时会使图像看起来比较暗淡。在弱光环境下，主摄像头根本无法使用。不过，对于主要使用 800 万像素镜头拍摄文件和文本的用户来说，应该会对它的拍照技术感到满意。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photo 1 Daylight photo 2 5x zoom Low-light photo

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+

Canon EOS 90D

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max

Google Pixel 8 Pro

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+

Canon EOS 90D

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max

Google Pixel 8 Pro

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+

Canon EOS 90D

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max

Google Pixel 8 Pro

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+

Canon EOS 90D

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max

Google Pixel 8 Pro

在受控的照明条件下，主相机在最佳照明条件下非常准确地再现了 ColorChecker 卡的颜色。它还清晰地再现了测试图。遗憾的是，在 1 勒克斯的残余光线下，情况恰恰相反，色卡和测试图在黑暗中消失了。

配件和保修 - 24 个月保修和 Samsung Care+ 服务

三星为其平板电脑提供了一条 USB-C 连接线、一个 SIM 卡工具、一本简短的说明书以及一份介绍平板电脑保修的附加宣传单。你必须自己购买一个兼容的电源，例如，你可以在三星的网上商店买到一个 15 瓦的充电器，价格约为 20 美元。制造商为平板电脑提供了多种书套。

三星Galaxy Tab A9+ 提供 24 个月的保修服务。可通过Samsung Care+ 延长保修期。保修期最长可达 2 年，保修范围还包括意外损坏（如显示屏破裂），保修范围还可扩展至失窃。根据所选套餐的不同，Samsung Care+ 的价格在 25 美元到 65 美元之间。

输入设备和操作 - 90 赫兹面板带来流畅的显示效果

Galaxy Tab A9+ 的屏幕能精确响应输入，没有任何明显的延迟。这款平板电脑不支持笔输入。它的屏幕频率为 90Hz，显示动画比同价位 60Hz 的竞争对手流畅得多。在对比设备中，小米小米红米 Pad SE也采用了 90 赫兹显示屏。

三星平板电脑没有指纹传感器。只能通过二维面部扫描进行生物识别登录，但这种方法并不特别安全，因为很容易被骗。另一方面，面部识别即使在光线不足的条件下也能快速、准确地工作。

▶ load Youtube video

显示屏 - 无 PWM 的 LC 显示屏

这款平板电脑的 11 英寸显示屏分辨率为 1920 x 1200 像素，纵横比为 16:10，像素密度为 206 PPI。在亮度方面，Galaxy Tab A9+ 与前代产品相比有了相当大的提升。

Galaxy Tab A9+ 的 LCD-TFT 面板在显示全白屏幕时的最大亮度可达 493 cd/m²。在显示明暗均匀分布的区域时（APL18 测量值），亮度几乎达到相同的水平，即 492 cd/m²。当您手动调整亮度时，亮度也不会发生变化。如果这样做，亮度可达到 490 cd/m²。使用最低亮度设置时，亮度值约为 3.7 cd/m²。

显示屏不使用任何脉宽调制（PWM）来调光。因此，这款平板电脑非常适合对 PWM 闪烁敏感的用户使用。


466 cd/m²	463 cd/m²	472 cd/m²
442 cd/m²	493 cd/m²	456 cd/m²
450 cd/m²	453 cd/m²	447 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 493 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 460.2 cd/m² Minimum: 3.7 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 493 cd/m²
Contrast: 1409:1 (Black: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 8.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.21

	Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 11"	Honor Pad 8 IPS, 2000x1200, 12"	Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 11"	Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 10.5"	Teclast M50 HD IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1"	Telekom T Tablet TFT-LCD, 2000x1200, 10.4"
Screen		2%	24%	-23%	-22%	-24%
Brightness middle	493	379 -23%	473 -4%	368 -25%	246 -50%	529 7%
Brightness	460	382 -17%	449 -2%	346 -25%	227 -51%	486 6%
Brightness Distribution	90	84 -7%	85 -6%	91 1%	88 -2%	87 -3%
Black Level *	0.35	0.3 14%	0.28 20%	0.61 -74%	0.33 6%	0.56 -60%
Contrast	1409	1263 -10%	1689 20%	603 -57%	745 -47%	945 -33%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	6	4.76 21%	3 50%	6.9 -15%	6.28 -5%	9.6 -60%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	11.7	9.25 21%	6 49%	11.4 3%	14.1 -21%	14.4 -23%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	8.2	6.7 18%	2.7 67%	7.7 6%	8.8 -7%	10.5 -28%
Gamma	2.21 ^100%	2.234 ^98%	2.27 ^97%	2.16 ^102%	2.277 ^97%	2.17 ^101%
CCT	9131 ^71%	8468 ^77%	6589 ^99%	8547 ^76%	8024 ^81%	10482 ^62%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

▶ load Youtube video

Galaxy Tab A9+ 的屏幕在色彩校准方面未达标。色彩和灰度显然都不理想，后者还显示出蓝色色调。不过，在日常使用中，你可能不会太注意到这些不够理想的预设图像参数。另一方面，得益于 1400:1 左右的对比度，屏幕的色彩还原效果非常出色。不过，你无法自行调节任何图像参数，甚至连色温都无法调节。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
29.92 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 13.96 ms rise
29.92 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 15.96 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
53.81 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 24.04 ms rise
53.81 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 29.77 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Galaxy Tab A9+ 的 TFT LCD 在室外的表现并不差。不过，由于屏幕反光刺眼，它肯定更适合在室内使用。从非常平整的角度仍然可以清晰地观看内容。如果不将平板电脑垂直于观看方向，屏幕就会变暗。尽管如此，其整体亮度下降还是比较适中的。

性能 - 配备骁龙 695 5G 处理器的Galaxy Tab A9+

中端骁龙 695 5GSoC 为Galaxy Tab A9+ 带来了稳定的系统性能。在日常使用中，它几乎总能确保流畅运行--在极少数情况下会出现一两次掉帧，例如直接启动系统后。得益于 4GB RAM，即使同时打开大量应用程序，平板电脑也不会接近极限。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1887, n=71, last 2 years)	707 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	693 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (659 - 697, n=24)	676 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	384 Points -45%
Honor Pad 8	377 Points -46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	365 Points -47%
Teclast M50 HD	305 Points -56%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)	2496 Points +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (1663 - 2038, n=24)	1904 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	1768 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	1684 Points -5%
Honor Pad 8	1522 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	1229 Points -30%
Teclast M50 HD	1191 Points -33%

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (185 - 3715, n=68, last 2 years)	1093 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	919 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (893 - 919, n=8)	906 Points -1%
Telekom T Tablet	711 Points -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	413 Points -55%
Teclast M50 HD	372 Points -60%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (493 - 14690, n=68, last 2 years)	3518 Points +77%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (1993 - 2189, n=8)	2073 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	1993 Points
Telekom T Tablet	1919 Points -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	1439 Points -28%
Teclast M50 HD	1392 Points -30%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1286774, n=49, last 2 years)	464403 Points +31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (344344 - 416086, n=18)	389461 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	354299 Points
Honor Pad 8	274001 Points -23%
Teclast M50 HD	202973 Points -43%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	201810 Points -43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	201310 Points -43%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	10550 Points
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 20841, n=73, last 2 years)	9812 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6897 - 11732, n=23)	9629 Points -9%
Telekom T Tablet	8329 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	7447 Points -29%
Teclast M50 HD	7259 Points -31%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	7068 Points -33%
Honor Pad 8	6655 Points -37%

CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=63, last 2 years)	772 Points +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (521 - 606, n=18)	583 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	578 Points
Telekom T Tablet	534 Points -8%
Honor Pad 8	407 Points -30%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	402 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	361 Points -38%
Teclast M50 HD	339 Points -41%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Tablet (444 - 11721, n=59, last 2 years)	4210 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (3171 - 3848, n=19)	3648 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	3596 Points
Telekom T Tablet	2839 Points -21%
Honor Pad 8	2621 Points -27%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	2551 Points -29%
Teclast M50 HD	1923 Points -47%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	1839 Points -49%
System
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6789 - 8231, n=19)	7725 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	7626 Points
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 16435, n=59, last 2 years)	7279 Points -5%
Honor Pad 8	5817 Points -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	5580 Points -27%
Telekom T Tablet	4934 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	4729 Points -38%
Teclast M50 HD	4335 Points -43%
Memory
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10977, n=59, last 2 years)	4874 Points +26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (3167 - 4836, n=19)	4227 Points +9%
Telekom T Tablet	3923 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	3872 Points
Honor Pad 8	3361 Points -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	3120 Points -19%
Teclast M50 HD	2805 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	970 Points -75%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (580 - 57192, n=59, last 2 years)	9171 Points +111%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (3975 - 4426, n=19)	4340 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	4337 Points
Telekom T Tablet	2667 Points -39%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	2179 Points -50%
Honor Pad 8	2098 Points -52%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	2001 Points -54%
Teclast M50 HD	1011 Points -77%
Web
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	1307 Points
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2051, n=59, last 2 years)	1269 Points -3%
Telekom T Tablet	1258 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (1078 - 1434, n=19)	1253 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	1246 Points -5%
Honor Pad 8	1151 Points -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	1116 Points -15%
Teclast M50 HD	1112 Points -15%

AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=51, last 2 years)	7152 Points +1567%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (426 - 3080, n=7)	825 Points +92%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	429 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	348 Points -19%
Teclast M50 HD	279 Points -35%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 74821, n=57, last 2 years)	11329 Points +99%
Telekom T Tablet	9056 Points +59%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (5442 - 9348, n=15)	6775 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	5687 Points
Honor Pad 8	4627 Points -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	4150 Points -27%
Teclast M50 HD	2690 Points -53%

Legend

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Honor Pad 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 128 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Teclast M50 HD Unisoc T7200, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 128 GB eMMC Flash

Telekom T Tablet MediaTek Dimensity 700, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G

Average of class Tablet

骁龙 695 5G 骁龙 695 5G搭载了 Adreno 619图形处理器，使这款平板电脑成为同类产品中性能最好的系统之一。它最强劲的竞争对手是电信 T 平板电脑，但它在任何基准测试中都未能击败其他候选测试机型。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	354 Points
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	318 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	179 Points -49%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	122 Points -66%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	121 Points -66%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	100 Points -72%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	361 Points
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	326 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	184 Points -49%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	123 Points -66%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	123 Points -66%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	90 Points -75%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1206 Points
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1171 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	708 Points -41%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	574 Points -52%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	445 Points -63%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	421 Points -65%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1216 Points
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1173 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	712 Points -41%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	589 Points -52%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	447 Points -63%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	425 Points -65%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3075 Points
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2511 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1463 Points -52%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1429 Points -54%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1356 Points -56%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	978 Points -68%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2991 Points
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2321 Points -22%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1309 Points -56%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1284 Points -57%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1184 Points -60%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	829 Points -72%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	3516 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3409 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	2865 Points -16%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2751 Points -19%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2650 Points -22%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2105 Points -38%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	82 fps
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	51 fps -38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	39 fps -52%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	37 fps -55%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	35 fps -57%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	22 fps -73%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	93 fps
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	61 fps -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	41 fps -56%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	41 fps -56%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	41 fps -56%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	22 fps -76%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	45 fps
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	34 fps -24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	25 fps -44%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	21 fps -53%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	19 fps -58%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	14 fps -69%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	47 fps
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	38 fps -19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	26 fps -45%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	22 fps -53%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	22 fps -53%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	14 fps -70%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	33 fps
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	23 fps -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	15 fps -55%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	14 fps -58%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	13 fps -61%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	8.7 fps -74%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	34 fps
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	24 fps -29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	15 fps -56%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	15 fps -56%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	15 fps -56%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	8.7 fps -74%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	19 fps
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	12 fps -37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	9.2 fps -52%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	7.5 fps -61%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7.2 fps -62%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	5.2 fps -73%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	19 fps
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	15 fps -21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	9.7 fps -49%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.3 fps -56%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	8.1 fps -57%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	5.4 fps -72%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	13 fps
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	8.3 fps -36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	6 fps -54%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	5.3 fps -59%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4.9 fps -62%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	3.4 fps -74%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.2 fps
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	5.2 fps -37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	3.6 fps -56%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	3.3 fps -60%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3.2 fps -61%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2 fps -76%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	21 fps
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	12 fps -43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	9.9 fps -53%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	9 fps -57%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.4 fps -60%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	5.4 fps -74%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	22 fps
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	13 fps -41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	10 fps -55%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	9.8 fps -55%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	9.6 fps -56%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	5.5 fps -75%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3.6 fps
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2.2 fps -39%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1.4 fps -61%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1.4 fps -61%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	0.85 fps -76%

Galaxy Tab A9+ 的网站加载速度很快。这也反映在浏览器测试中，该平板电脑在所有基准测试中都击败了竞争对手。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=69, last 2 years)	108.7 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)	96.598 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (48.6 - 105.3, n=19)	71.2 Points -26%
Telekom T Tablet (chrome 116)	58.17 Points -40%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)	52.9 Points -45%
Teclast M50 HD (Chrome 120)	50.247 Points -48%
Honor Pad 8 (Chrome 106.0.5249.126)	46.797 Points -52%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)	43.98 Points -54%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)	107 Points
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=68, last 2 years)	104.3 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (58 - 111, n=18)	74.3 Points -31%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)	57 Points -47%
Telekom T Tablet (chrome 116)	56 Points -48%
Teclast M50 HD (Chrome 120)	52 Points -51%
Honor Pad 8 (Chrome 106.0.5249.126)	48 Points -55%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=45, last 2 years)	149.6 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)	144 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (75 - 156, n=12)	101 Points -30%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)	93 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)	75 Points -48%
Honor Pad 8 (Chrome 106.0.5249.126)	70 Points -51%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=63, last 2 years)	115.5 runs/min +61%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)	71.6 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (38.7 - 80.1, n=16)	54 runs/min -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)	53.5 runs/min -25%
Honor Pad 8 (Chrome 106.0.5249.126)	40.54 runs/min -43%
Teclast M50 HD (Chrome 120)	39.3 runs/min -45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)	33.35 runs/min -53%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)	29301 Points
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years)	28653 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (17849 - 31647, n=21)	24051 Points -18%
Telekom T Tablet (chrome 116)	21843 Points -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 120)	14279 Points -51%
Honor Pad 8 (Chrome 106.0.5249.126)	13831 Points -53%
Teclast M50 HD (Chrome 120)	12397 Points -58%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)	10787 Points -63%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=74, last 2 years)	3789 ms * -180%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)	3060 ms * -126%
Teclast M50 HD (Chrome 120)	3053.2 ms * -126%
Honor Pad 8 (Chrome 106.0.5249.126)	2873.8 ms * -112%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)	2650.1 ms * -96%
Telekom T Tablet (chrome 116)	2194.9 ms * -62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (1298 - 2501, n=18)	1769 ms * -31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)	1352.9 ms *

* ... smaller is better

三星没有提供有关所安装存储设备的任何其他信息。不过，我们的基准测试结果表明，它是 UFS-2.2 存储设备。这确保了Galaxy Tab A9+ 较短的加载时间和较快的数据传输速度。的 Honor Pad 8则要快得多，而且它的 UFS-2.2 并没有像三星那样被 SoC 的存储控制器拖慢速度。

	Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	Honor Pad 8	Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	Teclast M50 HD	Telekom T Tablet	Average 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		45%	-31%	-60%	-54%	-55%	18%	55%
Sequential Read 256KB	485.96	833.56 72%	297.47 -39%	255.1 -48%	266.2 -45%	287.1 -41%	770 ?(485 - 979, n=18) 58%	1045 ?(163 - 3912, n=74, last 2 years) 115%
Sequential Write 256KB	476.37	708.51 49%	228.97 -52%	101.1 -79%	192.3 -60%	188.3 -60%	399 ?(120.6 - 519, n=18) -16%	684 ?(78.2 - 3154, n=74, last 2 years) 44%
Random Read 4KB	130.67	189.57 45%	102.41 -22%	68.3 -48%	70.4 -46%	52.8 -60%	156.6 ?(88.5 - 220, n=18) 20%	189.2 ?(18.4 - 451, n=74, last 2 years) 45%
Random Write 4KB	162.9	186.95 15%	146.92 -10%	57.5 -65%	61 -63%	66.55 -59%	177.7 ?(95.4 - 216, n=18) 9%	189.5 ?(8.23 - 555, n=74, last 2 years) 16%

游戏 - 可达到每秒 90 帧

我们测试了Galaxy Tab A9+ 的游戏流畅度。Asphalt 9 》以恒定的 30fps 运行，战术射击游戏《PUBG Mobile》也是如此（如果选择高清/高设置）。在图形设置方面，不可能有更多。PUBG Mobile》甚至没有提供使用最低细节级别的 90 帧模式，但可以达到 40 帧。

此外，对图形要求极高的《源氏冲击》也能在平板电脑上流畅运行。使用最低图形设置时，平均运行速度超过 50fps。使用最高细节设置时，平均帧率为 30fps，但会经常出现骤降。Galaxy Tab A9+ 只能在《地铁冲浪者》等简单游戏中正常使用其 90Hz 的屏幕。

我们使用测试工具Gamebench 测定了游戏的帧率。.

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+; Asphalt 9: Legends; 4.4.0k: Ø29.9 (27-31)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 4.4.0_20481013_20559831: Ø52.8 (27-61)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 4.4.0_20481013_20559831: Ø29.8 (18-58)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.0.0: Ø39.8 (35-41)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.0.0: Ø29.8 (27-31)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+; Subway Surfers; 3.24.1: Ø89.7 (88-90)

排放 - 4 个扬声器发出环绕声

温度

Galaxy Tab A9+ 在使用过程中保持低温。即使在要求苛刻的 "Burnout "基准测试中运行 1 小时--在实际使用中几乎不会出现这种负载情况--我们也只测得平板电脑表面的最高温度为 41.3 °C。

然后，我们使用 3DMark Wild 压力测试检查了平板电脑在持续负载情况下的性能是否下降。结果表明，没有出现节流现象。Galaxy Tab A9+ 渲染 3DMark Wild Life 测试场景的速度几乎和开始时一样快，即使在运行了 20 次之后也是如此。

Max. Load

Idle


36.5 °C	41.3 °C	39.1 °C
35.4 °C	35.1 °C	35.7 °C
33.9 °C	33.2 °C	32.8 °C

Maximum: 41.3 °C
Average: 35.9 °C


30.6 °C	39.1 °C	34.1 °C
34.3 °C	35.2 °C	34.8 °C
31.9 °C	34 °C	33.2 °C

Maximum: 39.1 °C
Average: 34.1 °C

Room Temperature 20.3 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.3 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.26 (7.23-7.27)

Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.68 (2.67-2.68)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.5 (3.49-3.5)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.26 (4.25-4.27)

Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.54 (2.53-2.55)

Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.09 (7.07-7.1)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.16 (2.14-2.16)

Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø0.737 (0.728-0.748)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.726 (0.72-0.741)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.7.2: Ø1.096 (1.091-1.101)

Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.633 (0.547-0.721)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.52 (3.52-3.53)

Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.02 (6.99-7.03)

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	99.2 (1.091^min - 1.101^max) % 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	99 (2.14^min - 2.16^max) %
Honor Pad 8	97.3 (0.728^min - 0.748^max) % -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	97.3 (0.72^min - 0.741^max) % -2%
Teclast M50 HD	75.9 (0.547^min - 0.721^max) % -23%
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Honor Pad 8	99.7 (2.67^min - 2.68^max) % 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	99.6 (4.25^min - 4.27^max) % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	99.6 (3.49^min - 3.5^max) % 0%
Telekom T Tablet	99.6 (7.07^min - 7.1^max) % 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	99.5 (7.23^min - 7.27^max) %
Teclast M50 HD	99.3 (2.53^min - 2.55^max) % 0%
Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	99.9 (3.52^min - 3.53^max) %
Telekom T Tablet	99.5 (6.99^min - 7.03^max) %

Legend

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Honor Pad 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 128 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Teclast M50 HD Unisoc T7200, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 128 GB eMMC Flash

Telekom T Tablet MediaTek Dimensity 700, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash

发言人

平板电脑的四个杜比全景声（Dolby Atmos）认证扬声器成对分布在设备的两个短边。如果将平板电脑直立或水平放置，您将始终听到环绕声。其特点是中高音相对均衡，但缺乏低音。不过总的来说，作为一款廉价平板电脑，该设备的音效体验还是相当不错的。

外接音频设备可通过蓝牙 5.1 或 3.5 毫米音频插孔与平板电脑连接，不过后者的噪音并不特别低（信噪比为 72.68 dBFS）。Galaxy Tab A9+ 只支持相对较少的蓝牙音频编解码器，即 AAC、aptX、LDAC、SBC 和 SSC（三星无缝编解码器）。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 充电功率高达 15 瓦

耗电量

Galaxy Tab A9+ 的最大充电功率可达 15 瓦，这比上一代产品有了很大改进，上一代产品的最大充电功率仅为 7.8 瓦。相比之下 Galaxy Tab A8相比，该机型没有配备电源，因此您必须从其他地方购买。在我们的测试中，使用Apple 提供的 20 瓦电源为Galaxy Tab A9+ 的 7040 毫安时电池完全充电大约需要 3 个小时（2:58 h）。

在功耗方面，Galaxy Tab A9+ 的表现并不显眼，但其效率仍不及 Honor Pad 8或 Teclast M50 HD为例。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.03 / 0.21 Watt
Idle	1 / 4.76 / 4.79 Watt
Load	9.52 / 9.92 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ 7040 mAh	Honor Pad 8 7250 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 7040 mAh	Teclast M50 HD 6000 mAh	Telekom T Tablet 7000 mAh
Power Consumption		39%	9%	4%	46%	-8%
Idle Minimum *	1	1.1 -10%	0.63 37%	1.19 -19%	1.2 -20%	1.28 -28%
Idle Average *	4.76	1.5 68%	4.25 11%	4.63 3%	1.3 73%	4.52 5%
Idle Maximum *	4.79	2.1 56%	4.34 9%	4.68 2%	1.5 69%	4.58 4%
Load Average *	9.52	4.4 54%	10.24 -8%	7.27 24%	3.6 62%	10.5 -10%
Load Maximum *	9.92	7.2 27%	10.47 -6%	9.17 8%	5.5 45%	11.2 -13%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G: Ø4.05 (1.974-6.6)

Honor Pad 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G: Ø4.56 (2.69-7.24)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G: Ø3.52 (1.674-7.23)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.41 (4.18-4.71)

Honor Pad 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.44 (3.56-4.75)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.97 (2.43-3.19)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.02 (1.986-2.31)

Honor Pad 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.232 (1.132-1.477)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.74 (1.672-2.5)

运行时间

Galaxy Tab A9+ 的电池容量为 7040 毫安时，在同类产品中可能不是最大的，但仍能帮助这款平板电脑获得不错的续航时间。在连续循环播放高清视频时，三星平板电脑的续航时间为 13:20 小时，在模拟网上冲浪时甚至能达到 15:20 小时。这使它与竞争对手不相上下，因为对比设备在这两种情况下的运行时间非常接近。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		37h 55min
WiFi Websurfing		15h 20min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		13h 20min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 03min

	Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ 7040 mAh	Honor Pad 8 7250 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 7040 mAh	Teclast M50 HD 6000 mAh	Telekom T Tablet 7000 mAh
Battery Runtime		-4%	29%	-10%	-12%	-16%
Reader / Idle	2275	2448 8%	4236 86%	1973 -13%	1774 -22%
H.264	800	838 5%	997 25%	824 3%	785 -2%
WiFi v1.3	920	733 -20%	1017 11%	679 -26%	667 -27%	775 -16%
Load	243	225 -7%	231 -5%	230 -5%	249 2%

Pros

+ 同价位产品中最亮的显示屏

+ 90 赫兹

+ 更新周期长

+ 精确的 GPS

+ 可选 5G

+ 做工精良

+ 三星 DeX（有限制）

+ 稳定的 SoC 性能

+ 快速存储

+ 4 个扬声器

Cons

- 最小版本只有 64GB

- 充电速度慢

- 设备不带电源

- 只有一种颜色配置文件

- 无指纹传感器

- 蓝牙编解码器数量少

三星Galaxy Tab A9+ 的评价

三星Galaxy Tab A9+ 取代了广受欢迎的 Galaxy Tab A8作为一款功能强大的入门级平板电脑。与前代产品相比，它在硬件方面的改进尤为突出。其骁龙 695 5G使Galaxy Tab A9+ 成为冲浪和 Netflix 的全能选手，而且还能很好地运行当前的游戏。

三星Galaxy Tab A9+ 的良好性价比给人留下了深刻印象。与上一代产品相比，它有了大量改进。

按照三星的标准，它的新功能简直令人印象深刻，因为它现在还使用了 90Hz 显示屏、更大的存储空间，并首次提供了 5G 选项。另外，三星承诺的 4 年更新期也是购买该产品的一个有力理由，这在同价位的其他设备中是绝无仅有的。今年 2 月，根据三星更新网站的说法，这款平板电脑将升级到 One UI 6 /Android 14。

对于这个价位的平板电脑来说，Galaxy Tab A9+ 具有很高的性价比，它的三星 DeX 是以前只有Galaxy Tab S 型号才有的附加功能。遗憾的是，Galaxy Tab A9+ 不支持三星的 S Pen，这在一定程度上限制了桌面模式的使用。如果你购买的是 64GB 版本，存储空间也可能很快不够用，因为平板电脑的内部存储空间不能通过 microSD 卡扩展。

三星Galaxy Tab A9+ 的替代产品包括小米红米 Pad SE也采用了 90-Hz 显示屏。电信 T 平板电脑电信 T 平板电脑也值得一看，因为它支持 5G，在性能上与三星 Tab 相当接近。

价格和供应情况

Galaxy Tab A9+ 配有 64GB 存储空间，目前在亚马逊的售价为189.99 美元，而不是 219.99 美元。

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ - 02/16/2024 v7 ^(old)
Manuel Masiero

Chassis

83 / 98 → 84%

Keyboard

70 / 80 → 87%

Pointing Device

91%

Connectivity

44 / 70 → 62%

Weight

84 / 40-88 → 91%

Battery

90%

Display

82%

Games Performance

33 / 78 → 42%

Application Performance

74 / 92 → 80%

Temperature

91%

Noise

100%

Audio

78 / 91 → 86%

Camera

51 / 85 → 60%

Average

74%

84%

Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.