华为P30 Pro智能手机评测

Name: Huawei P30 Pro
Brand: Huawei

几近完美——

去年，华为P20 Pro在手机摄影方面树立了新的标准，现在这家中国公司又回来了，希望能够在这些成功的基础上再接再厉。 P30 Pro还包括我们所期望的旗舰产品所具有的所有技术，并且价格低廉。请继续阅读，了解华为是否已开发出新的手机摄像奇迹，以及它与其他现有旗舰的竞争情况。

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by Zewei Shen), Published 06/08/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Touchscreen Smartphone Phablet

Test device courtesy of Huawei Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Huawei P30 Pro (P30 Series)

Processor

HiSilicon Kirin 980 8 x - 2.6 GHz, Cortex-A76/-A55

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G76 MP10

Memory

8 GB

Display

6.47 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 398 PPI, 十点触控, OLED, HDR, glossy: yes, HDR, 60 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 256 GB

, 242.63 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, Audio Connections: USB Type-C, Card Reader: 高达256 GB的纳米存储卡, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速计，环境光传感器，气压计，指南针，指纹传感器，陀螺仪，红外线，激光，色温, Infrared blaster, USB OTG

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/Edge: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz. UMTS/HSPA+: Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19. LTE FDD: Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32; TDD: Band 34, 38, 39, 40., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.41 x 158.01 x 73.37

Battery

16.04 Wh, 4200 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 3.82 V, kabelloses Laden, Reverse Wireless Charging

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 40 MPix f / 1.6，OIS，27 mm。 2000万像素超广角相机：f / 2.2,16 mm。 8 00万像素长焦相机：f / 3.4，OIS，125 mm。 TOF相机，10倍混合变焦，50倍数码变焦
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix

Additional features

Keyboard: 虚拟, USB Type-C耳机，40 W充电器，USB线，SIM工具，快速入门指南, EMUI 9.1, 24 Months Warranty, IP68认证。 SAR值：Body-0.64 W / kg，Head-0.79 W / kg。, fanless, waterproof

Weight

192 g

Price

1099 Euro

Links

Huawei homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Huawei P30 Pro Google Pixel 3 XL Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Apple iPhone Xs Max Xiaomi Mi 9 Huawei P20 Pro DIN A6 ❌

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei P30 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	670 (542^min - 717^max) MBit/s
Huawei P30 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	541 (129^min - 633^max) MBit/s -19%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	647 MBit/s -3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash	602 MBit/s -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	534 (430^min - 578^max) MBit/s -20%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	457 (398^min - 508^max) MBit/s -32%
Google Pixel 3 XL Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	456 (429^min - 468^max) MBit/s -32%
Huawei P20 Pro Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	437 MBit/s -35%
iperf3 receive AX12
Huawei P30 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1014 (944^min - 1115^max) MBit/s
Huawei P30 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	661 (624^min - 683^max) MBit/s -35%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	678 (549^min - 725^max) MBit/s -33%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	677 MBit/s -33%
Huawei P20 Pro Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	635 MBit/s -37%
Google Pixel 3 XL Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	635 (315^min - 645^max) MBit/s -37%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	633 (561^min - 684^max) MBit/s -38%
Apple iPhone Xs Max A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash	624 MBit/s -38%

Huawei P30 Pro; iperf3 receive AX12; Nighthawk AX 12 (iperf 3.1.3): Ø1014 (944-1115)

Huawei P30 Pro; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø660 (624-683)

Huawei P30 Pro; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø670 (542-717)

Huawei P30 Pro; iperf3 transmit AX12; Nighthawk AX 12 (iperf 3.1.3): Ø541 (129-633)

GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Cycling around a lake

GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Taking a sharp corner

GPS test: Huawei P30 Pro – Cycling around a lake

GPS test: Huawei P30 Pro - Taking a sharp corner

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

Photographed with the ultra-wide-angle camera

Photographed with the main camera in night mode

Photographed with the main camera at 40 MP

Our test chart photographed using the ultra-wide-angle sensor

Our test chart in detail: Telephoto lens


595 cd/m²	603 cd/m²	636 cd/m²
576 cd/m²	597 cd/m²	635 cd/m²
584 cd/m²	597 cd/m²	647 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 647 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 607.8 cd/m² Minimum: 1.84 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 597 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23

	Huawei P30 Pro OLED, 2340x1080, 6.5"	Huawei P20 Pro OLED, 2240x1080, 6.1"	Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus OLED, 3040x1440, 6.4"	Apple iPhone Xs Max OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5"	Xiaomi Mi 9 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4"	Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium LCD-IPS, 3840x2160, 5.8"	Google Pixel 3 XL AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.3"
Screen		13%	-34%	9%	19%	-29%	-26%
Brightness middle	597	569 -5%	710 19%	656 10%	593 -1%	477 -20%	410 -31%
Brightness	608	578 -5%	721 19%	659 8%	587 -3%	453 -25%	413 -32%
Brightness Distribution	89	95 7%	97 9%	88 -1%	94 6%	86 -3%	97 9%
Black Level *						0.33
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.2	1.3 41%	3.7 -68%	1.7 23%	0.9 59%	2.1 5%	3.16 -44%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.6	2.1 42%	10.3 -186%	2.8 22%	2 44%	8.2 -128%	5.5 -53%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.6	1.6 -0%	1.5 6%	1.7 -6%	1.5 6%	1.6 -0%	1.7 -6%
Gamma	2.23 ^99%	2.31 ^95%	2.1 ^105%	1.998 ^110%	2.27 ^97%	2.28 ^96%	2.219 ^99%
CCT	6268 ^104%	6401 ^102%	6611 ^98%	6487 ^100%	6548 ^99%	6425 ^101%	6653 ^98%
Contrast						1445

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

231.5 Hz

≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 231.5 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 231.5 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3306 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4505 Points +36%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	4774 Points +44%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3523 Points +7%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2457 Points -26%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	2325 Points -30%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	1922 Points -42%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (3207 - 3378, n=9)	3303 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)	5422 Points +64%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	9880 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	10259 Points +4%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	11244 Points +14%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10999 Points +11%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8522 Points -14%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	8292 Points -16%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	6756 Points -32%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (9547 - 10024, n=9)	9838 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)	14892 Points +51%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	8574 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	10177 Points +19%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7482 Points -13%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	14417 Points +68%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	10876 Points +27%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	8025 Points -6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (5677 - 9870, n=9)	7355 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=57, last 2 years)	11924 Points +39%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	12996 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	9793 Points -25%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10985 Points -15%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	9858 Points -24%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	11180 Points -14%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	8115 Points -38%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (9728 - 13531, n=10)	11164 Points -14%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	9135 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	7812 Points -14%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9035 Points -1%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8178 Points -10%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	9029 Points -1%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	6982 Points -24%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (7567 - 9326, n=10)	8433 Points -8%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	51779 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	55740 Points +8%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	77599 Points +50%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	62225 Points +20%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	64152 Points +24%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	34855 Points -33%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	30176 Points -42%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (34035 - 57073, n=10)	43799 Points -15%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	63469 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	70318 Points +11%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	159735 Points +152%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	106534 Points +68%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	81502 Points +28%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	53794 Points -15%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	33472 Points -47%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (42128 - 67956, n=10)	53280 Points -16%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	31483 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	32302 Points +3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	27717 Points -12%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	25339 Points -20%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	36762 Points +17%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	15614 Points -50%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	22441 Points -29%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (19993 - 37164, n=10)	27047 Points -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4969 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4465 Points -10%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	5205 Points +5%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7166 Points +44%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5492 Points +11%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	6180 Points +24%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	3223 Points -35%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (2567 - 5638, n=10)	4152 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5431 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5303 Points -2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	7055 Points +30%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9963 Points +83%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8219 Points +51%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	7780 Points +43%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	3335 Points -39%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (2347 - 6111, n=10)	4277 Points -21%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points -13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3828 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	2875 Points -25%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	2713 Points -29%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3614 Points -6%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2541 Points -34%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	3594 Points -6%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	2885 Points -25%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (3548 - 4436, n=10)	3942 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5313 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4052 Points -24%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	6667 Points +25%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7449 Points +40%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5438 Points +2%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	6228 Points +17%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	3360 Points -37%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (2525 - 5990, n=10)	4247 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=74, last 2 years)	11160 Points +110%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5767 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4449 Points -23%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	10374 Points +80%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10291 Points +78%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	7609 Points +32%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	8380 Points +45%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	3503 Points -39%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (2536 - 6350, n=10)	4495 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=74, last 2 years)	19815 Points +244%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4164 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	3087 Points -26%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	2961 Points -29%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3788 Points -9%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2721 Points -35%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	3280 Points -21%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	2940 Points -29%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (2421 - 4997, n=10)	3580 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=74, last 2 years)	5009 Points +20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4264 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4452 Points +4%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	3544 Points -17%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5509 Points +29%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4734 Points +11%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	4662 Points +9%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	2996 Points -30%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (2276 - 4835, n=10)	3929 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=74, last 2 years)	3077 Points -28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4400 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5186 Points +18%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	3726 Points -15%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6355 Points +44%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5190 Points +18%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	5089 Points +16%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	3017 Points -31%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (2082 - 4937, n=10)	3960 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=74, last 2 years)	3252 Points -26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3849 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	2977 Points -23%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	3027 Points -21%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3758 Points -2%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3620 Points -6%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	3605 Points -6%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	2926 Points -24%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (3380 - 4509, n=10)	3889 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=74, last 2 years)	3288 Points -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4317 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4529 Points +5%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	4121 Points -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5913 Points +37%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4555 Points +6%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	5133 Points +19%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	3070 Points -29%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (2611 - 5102, n=10)	3823 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)	7682 Points +78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4361 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5371 Points +23%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	4828 Points +11%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7076 Points +62%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5651 Points +30%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	5789 Points +33%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	3109 Points -29%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (2747 - 5157, n=10)	3997 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)	11410 Points +162%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4171 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	2925 Points -30%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	2723 Points -35%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3754 Points -10%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2713 Points -35%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	3676 Points -12%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	2942 Points -29%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (2227 - 4917, n=10)	3461 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)	4587 Points +10%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	60 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	58 fps -3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps 0%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	60 fps 0%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	60 fps 0%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	60 fps 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (55 - 62, n=10)	58.7 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	85.7 fps +43%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	138 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	96 fps -30%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	226 fps +64%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	167 fps +21%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	150 fps +9%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	140 fps +1%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	121 fps -12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (68 - 138, n=10)	109.5 fps -21%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=170, last 2 years)	279 fps +102%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	59 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	53 fps -10%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	59 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps +2%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	58 fps -2%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	37 fps -37%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	54 fps -8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (37 - 60, n=10)	54.8 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	75 fps +27%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	91 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	67 fps -26%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	107 fps +18%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	100 fps +10%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	71 fps -22%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	56 fps -38%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	61 fps -33%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (40 - 91, n=10)	70 fps -23%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=170, last 2 years)	164.1 fps +80%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	47 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	37 fps -21%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	58.9 fps +25%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	58 fps +23%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	56 fps +19%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	25 fps -47%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	36 fps -23%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (24 - 54, n=10)	43.4 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=170, last 2 years)	65.2 fps +39%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	56 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	67 fps +20%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	69.3 fps +24%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	69 fps +23%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	58 fps +4%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	45 fps -20%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	39 fps -30%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (25 - 56, n=10)	45.2 fps -19%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=170, last 2 years)	116.5 fps +108%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	27 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	23 fps -15%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	31 fps +15%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	38 fps +41%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	37 fps +37%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	18 fps -33%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	22 fps -19%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (15 - 30, n=10)	24 fps -11%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=171, last 2 years)	47.5 fps +76%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	33 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	43 fps +30%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	40 fps +21%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	42 fps +27%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	35 fps +6%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	33 fps 0%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	23 fps -30%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (17 - 33, n=10)	28.8 fps -13%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=170, last 2 years)	70.3 fps +113%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	32 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	26 fps -19%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	47 fps +47%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	37 fps +16%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	40 fps +25%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	23 fps -28%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (18 - 33, n=9)	29.8 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=202, last 2 years)	49.3 fps +54%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	36 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	46 fps +28%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	36.8 fps +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	41 fps +14%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	38 fps +6%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	23 fps -36%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (30 - 37, n=9)	33.2 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=202, last 2 years)	79.4 fps +121%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	20 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	16 fps -20%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	32.1 fps +61%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	24 fps +20%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	25 fps +25%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	14 fps -30%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (19 - 21, n=9)	20.3 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=202, last 2 years)	37.1 fps +86%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	14 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	17 fps +21%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	16.3 fps +16%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	16 fps +14%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	14 fps 0%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	8.6 fps -39%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (13 - 14, n=9)	13.7 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=202, last 2 years)	31.6 fps +126%

Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	30.67 (5.93^min - 132.19^max) fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	38.5 (9.69^min - 72.94^max) fps +26%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	35.63 fps +16%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	11.8 (5.55^min - 28.23^max) fps -62%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (25.6 - 30.7, n=2)	28.1 fps -8%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	28.46 (9.24^min - 54.37^max) fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	27.18 (8.36^min - 46.5^max) fps -4%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	32.2 fps +13%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	10.52 (5^min - 27.66^max) fps -63%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (16.9 - 28.5, n=2)	22.7 fps -20%
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	27.02 (2.8^min - 80.83^max) fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	32.26 (8.31^min - 85.07^max) fps +19%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	37.41 fps +38%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	24.45 (9.63^min - 65.63^max) fps -10%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (27 - 29.1, n=2)	28.1 fps +4%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	316199 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	333277 Points +5%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	302955 Points -4%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	374820 Points +19%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	246366 Points -22%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	285269 Points -10%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	207959 Points -34%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (268359 - 322616, n=10)	295586 Points -7%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	247307 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	273655 Points +11%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	257246 Points +4%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	226124 Points -9%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	215632 Points -13%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	179709 Points -27%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (245662 - 254229, n=9)	250407 Points +1%

VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5020 Score
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4967 Score -1%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4964 Score -1%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	1980 Score -61%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (5020 - 5025, n=2)	5023 Score 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=6, last 2 years)	5819 Score +16%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4701 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4520 Points -4%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	4895 Points +4%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4595 Points -2%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4288 Points -9%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	3291 Points -30%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	3271 Points -30%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (4014 - 4746, n=10)	4446 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=152, last 2 years)	6257 Points +33%
System (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	8572 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	8344 Points -3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	11675 Points +36%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	8441 Points -2%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8418 Points -2%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	4417 Points -48%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	5965 Points -30%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (7597 - 8604, n=10)	8146 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=152, last 2 years)	10131 Points +18%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5210 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4306 Points -17%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	1815 Points -65%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4031 Points -23%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3704 Points -29%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	2825 Points -46%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	4050 Points -22%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (5116 - 6283, n=10)	5580 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=152, last 2 years)	6714 Points +29%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	7758 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	8401 Points +8%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	15659 Points +102%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9270 Points +19%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	7743 Points 0%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	7989 Points +3%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	3725 Points -52%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (4963 - 7758, n=10)	6484 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=152, last 2 years)	16761 Points +116%
Web (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	1409 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	1383 Points -2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	1731 Points +23%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1378 Points -2%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	1400 Points -1%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	1176 Points -17%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	1273 Points -10%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (1239 - 1462, n=10)	1343 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=152, last 2 years)	1557 Points +11%

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	1627 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	1928 Points +19%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	2407 Points +48%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1415 Points -13%
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144	887 Points -45%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (1571 - 1627, n=2)	1599 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (205 - 7616, n=56, last 2 years)	2316 Points +42%

WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)	155 Points +27%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=82, last 2 years)	147.1 Points +21%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)	122 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)	115 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	108 Points -11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (86 - 124, n=10)	105.1 Points -14%
Google Pixel 3 XL (Chrome 70)	100 Points -18%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)	75 Points -39%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)	69 Points -43%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)	43114 Points +92%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)	36733 Points +64%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	24534 Points +9%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)	22447 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (20618 - 23285, n=10)	21733 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)	20849 Points -7%
Google Pixel 3 XL (Chrome 70)	16228 Points -28%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)	13360 Points -40%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)	11584 Points -48%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)	3852 ms * -92%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)	3179 ms * -58%
Google Pixel 3 XL (Chrome 70)	2785 ms * -39%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (1948 - 3098, n=10)	2176 ms * -8%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)	2009 ms *
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	1873 ms * +7%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)	1857 ms * +8%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years)	1583 ms * +21%
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)	603 ms * +70%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=162, last 2 years)	119.3 Points +97%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)	60.5 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73)	57.2 Points -5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (48.4 - 60.9, n=6)	53.1 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samung Browser 9.0)	44.13 Points -27%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 74)	24.49 Points -60%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=148, last 2 years)	133.6 runs/min +97%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)	67.8 runs/min
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	65.7 runs/min -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (58.3 - 67.8, n=6)	61.7 runs/min -9%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)	56 runs/min -17%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 74)	27.1 runs/min -60%

* ... smaller is better

	Huawei P30 Pro	Huawei P20 Pro	Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus	Xiaomi Mi 9	Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	Google Pixel 3 XL	Average 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-10%	-23%	6%	-45%	-21%	-2%	185%
Sequential Read 256KB	849	832 -2%	811 -4%	666 -22%	749 -12%	633 -25%	826 ?(496 - 984, n=22) -3%	1838 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years) 116%
Sequential Write 256KB	250.8	196.7 -22%	249.1 -1%	388.3 55%	171 -32%	228.6 -9%	358 ?(198.5 - 914, n=22) 43%	1430 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years) 470%
Random Read 4KB	174.4	144.3 -17%	135.2 -22%	149.4 -14%	136 -22%	120.8 -31%	166.6 ?(108.4 - 265, n=22) -4%	278 ?(22.2 - 543, n=192, last 2 years) 59%
Random Write 4KB	159.2	160.5 1%	22.7 -86%	165.3 4%	21.75 -86%	132.7 -17%	141.5 ?(22.1 - 280, n=22) -11%	310 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years) 95%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	82.6 ?(Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)		73 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -12%		34.18 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -59%		66.8 ?(25.5 - 82.6, n=4) -19%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	68.2 ?(Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)		60.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -11%		30.23 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -56%		56.3 ?(16.7 - 73.3, n=4) -17%

PUBG Mobile

Huawei P30 Pro; 0.11.0: Ø30 (26-31)

World of Tanks

Huawei P30 Pro; 5.9.0.669: Ø60.1 (44-61)

Battle Bay

Huawei P30 Pro; 4.3.22176: Ø60.2 (60-61)

Max. Load

Idle


35.5 °C	35.3 °C	33.4 °C
36.5 °C	36.2 °C	33.2 °C
35.8 °C	35.8 °C	33.5 °C

Maximum: 36.5 °C
Average: 35 °C


33 °C	33.4 °C	33.9 °C
32.1 °C	33.4 °C	34.6 °C
32.9 °C	34.2 °C	34.7 °C

Maximum: 34.7 °C
Average: 33.6 °C

Power Supply (max.) 28.8 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.4 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Huawei P30 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.01 / 0.11 Watt
Idle	0.68 / 2.6 / 2.77 Watt
Load	3.74 / 6.82 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Huawei P30 Pro 4200 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus 4100 mAh	Apple iPhone Xs Max 3174 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh	Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium 3540 mAh	Google Pixel 3 XL 3430 mAh	Huawei P20 Pro 4000 mAh	Average HiSilicon Kirin 980	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-7%	3%	14%	-0%	1%	31%	-5%	-12%
Idle Minimum *	0.68	0.73 -7%	1 -47%	0.67 1%	0.67 1%	0.7 -3%	0.84 -24%	0.802 ?(0.6 - 0.97, n=10) -18%	0.895 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=153, last 2 years) -32%
Idle Average *	2.6	1.53 41%	1.4 46%	1.26 52%	2.5 4%	1.4 46%	1.54 41%	2.07 ?(0.9 - 2.6, n=10) 20%	1.447 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=153, last 2 years) 44%
Idle Maximum *	2.77	2.07 25%	1.7 39%	1.29 53%	2.51 9%	2 28%	1.57 43%	2.38 ?(1.83 - 2.77, n=10) 14%	1.608 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=153, last 2 years) 42%
Load Average *	3.74	6.03 -61%	4.6 -23%	3.71 1%	4.3 -15%	4.8 -28%	2.47 34%	4.87 ?(3.74 - 6.3, n=10) -30%	6.41 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=148, last 2 years) -71%
Load Maximum *	6.82	9.18 -35%	6.7 2%	9.3 -36%	6.87 -1%	9.5 -39%	2.49 63%	7.46 ?(6.15 - 9.85, n=10) -9%	9.61 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=148, last 2 years) -41%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		32h 46min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 73)		13h 58min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		19h 53min
Load (maximum brightness)		5h 44min

	Huawei P30 Pro 4200 mAh	Huawei P20 Pro 4000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus 4100 mAh	Apple iPhone Xs Max 3174 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh	Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium 3540 mAh	Google Pixel 3 XL 3430 mAh
Battery Runtime		-14%	-33%	-28%	-28%	-39%	-21%
Reader / Idle	1966	1727 -12%	1560 -21%	1305 -34%	1650 -16%	1347 -31%	1725 -12%
H.264	1193	784 -34%	921 -23%	801 -33%	1008 -16%	520 -56%	724 -39%
WiFi v1.3	838	744 -11%	483 -42%	742 -11%	546 -35%	547 -35%	691 -18%
Load	344	345 0%	187 -46%	223 -35%	194 -44%	235 -32%	299 -13%

Pros

+ 极其优秀的徕卡四摄

+ 明亮的OLED面板

+ IP68防水防尘

+ 可扩展的存储

+ 续航时间长

+ 带有HDMI和DisplayPort输出的USB 3.1

+ 快速有线和无线充电

Cons

- 一般般的扬声器

- 不附带3.5mm耳机接口转接器

- 摄像仍然有提升空间

- 游戏性能算不上最强

- 第二SIM槽为混合模式

华为P30 Pro智能手机评测. Test device courtesy of Huawei Germany.

华为P30 Pro是2019年推出的旗舰级智能手机之一。该设备采用现代化设计，以优秀的硬件为基础。即使在一些游戏中表现一般，麒麟980 SoC也为系统提供了充足的性能。其8 GB的RAM和至少128 GB的内部存储应该让大多数人满意。我们也喜欢华为选择添加可扩展存储，即使是他们专有的nano存储卡格式。

华为也没有对某些细节嗤之以鼻。 P30 Pro经过IP68防尘和防水认证，同时可以像Mate 20 Pro和Galaxy S10系列一样为其他设备进行无线充电。P30 Pro与Mate 20 Pro共享其许多功能，尽管它缺乏后者拥有的3D面部识别功能。

徕卡四摄像头是这台手机的重中之重，但华为P30 Pro在其他领域也表现出色，并提供引人注目的旗舰体验。我们希望华为能够改善其视频性能，目前它还算不上最领先的。

与华为的前代产品相比，P30 Pro具有非常出色的相机。P30 Pro在低光条件下表现出色，能捕捉即使是肉眼也难以看到的细节。它还提供了领先的变焦镜头，比竞争对手领先一大截。然而，它的相机有它们的缺点。在我们的测试中，白平衡一直太红，而其视频功能还有很多不足之处。我们希望华为能够在即将到来的更新中解决我们的担忧，而且这台5000多块钱的智能手机居然没有60 FPS的4K拍摄。

总的来说，华为P30 Pro是一款出色但昂贵的智能手机。如果您意识到这一点，该设备不会让您失望，因为它有着同级领先的续航和拍照。

Huawei P30 Pro - 2022-09-03 09/03/2022 v7 ^(old)
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis

92%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 90%

Pointing Device

97%

Connectivity

66 / 70 → 95%

Weight

89%

Battery

91%

Display

91%

Games Performance

48 / 64 → 75%

Application Performance

77 / 86 → 90%

Temperature

91%

Noise

100%

Audio

82 / 90 → 91%

Camera

81%

Average

83%

89%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - Senior Tech Writer - 11107 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

contact me via: @aldersonaj

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 451873 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 华为P30 Pro智能手机评测

Daniel Schmidt, 2019-06- 8 (Update: 2019-06- 8)

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

PUBG Mobile

World of Tanks

Battle Bay

Huawei P30 Pro audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus audio analysis

Pros

Cons

More articles related to this device

Price comparison