技嘉 P55W v6 笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: Gigabyte P55W v6
Brand: Gigabyte

专注基础。 技嘉的最新版P55W变化并不大。前代机型搭配GeForce GTX 970M现在变成了GTX 1060——而这带来了不小的区别。

Oliver Moebel, ✓ Tanja Hinum (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 02/11/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Skylake Windows

Test device courtesy of Gigabyte DE

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Gigabyte P55W v6 (P55 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i7-6700HQ 4 x 2.6 - 3.5 GHz, Skylake

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile - 6 GB VRAM, Core: 1405 MHz, RAM: 4000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 368.71, Optimus

Memory

16 GB

, SO-DIMM DDR4-2133, 双通道, 2个插槽已占用, 最高支持 32 GB

Display

15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LG Philips LP156WF4 (LGD040E), IPS, 全高清, glossy: no

Mainboard

Intel HM170 (Skylake PCH-H)

Storage

Transcend MTS800 128GB M.2 (TS128GMTS800), 128 GB

, 固态硬盘 + HGST TravelStar 7K1000 (HTS721010A9E630), 1 TB HDD @7200 rpm. 插槽: 1x m.2 2280 (SATA/PCIe) & 1x 2.5寸

Soundcard

Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Skylake PCH - High Definition Audio Controller

Connections

3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 耳机接口，麦克风接口, Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC

Networking

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1

Optical drive

HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUD0N

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 34 x 380 x 269

Battery

63 Wh, 5400 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 6 芯

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 高清 (720p@30fps)
Primary Camera: 0 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: 2.0 , Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: yes, 180瓦电源适配器，说明书，质保卡，驱动盘, PowerDVD 12, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

2.66 kg, Power Supply: 640 g

Price

1600 EUR

Links

Gigabyte homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Connectivity hasn't changed: the left side features Kensington Lock, VGA, RJ45 GBit-LAN, HDMI, USB 3.1 and USB 3.0 ,...

... and the right side two 3.5 mm jacks for the microphone and the headphones, 2x USB 3.0, optical drive and the power jack.

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q	79 MB/s +8%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T	75 MB/s +3%
Gigabyte P55W v6	73 MB/s
Gigabyte P55W v5	47 MB/s -36%
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro	26 MB/s -64%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q	89 MB/s +2%
Gigabyte P55W v6	87 MB/s
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T	85 MB/s -2%
Gigabyte P55W v5	76 MB/s -13%
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro	28 MB/s -68%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	608 MBit/s +24%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	507 MBit/s +3%
Gigabyte P55W v6 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	492 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	677 MBit/s +3%
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	670 MBit/s +2%
Gigabyte P55W v6 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	660 MBit/s


282 cd/m²	296 cd/m²	306 cd/m²
271 cd/m²	280 cd/m²	294 cd/m²
287 cd/m²	294 cd/m²	332 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

LG Philips LP156WF4 (LGD040E) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 332 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 293.6 cd/m² Minimum: 8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 82 %
Center on Battery: 280 cd/m²
Contrast: 609:1 (Black: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.48 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 2.69 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
80% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
53% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
80.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.37

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Gigabyte P55W v6 LG Philips LP156WF4 (LGD040E), 1920x1080	Gigabyte P55W v5 LG Philips LP156WF4-SPH1, 1920x1080	Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080	MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro Samsung 156HL01-104 (SDC324C) , 1920x1080	Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q LG Philips LP156WF6-SPP1 (LGD04D5), 1920x1080
Display		-14%	3%	15%	3%
Display P3 Coverage	63.2	50.1 -21%	64.5 2%	67.8 7%	63.6 1%
sRGB Coverage	80.6	73.5 -9%	83.4 3%	97.4 21%	83.9 4%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	59	51.2 -13%	60.9 3%	69.7 18%	61.3 4%
Response Times		17%	24%	16%	28%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	56 ?(23, 33)	44 ?(18, 26) 21%	40 ?(15, 25) 29%		35 ?(14, 21) 37%
Response Time Black / White *	31 ?(8, 23)	27 ?(7, 20) 13%	25 ?(5, 20) 19%	26 ?(8, 18) 16%	25 ?(5, 20) 19%
PWM Frequency				202 ?(100)
Screen		6%	10%	14%	13%
Brightness middle	280	254 -9%	321 15%	293 5%	273 -2%
Brightness	294	267 -9%	296 1%	279 -5%	267 -9%
Brightness Distribution	82	89 9%	88 7%	84 2%	83 1%
Black Level *	0.46	0.28 39%	0.33 28%	0.33 28%	0.27 41%
Contrast	609	907 49%	973 60%	888 46%	1011 66%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.48	4.28 4%	4.42 1%	3.59 20%	3.77 16%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	10.16	10.6 -4%	9.78 4%	5.79 43%	10.64 -5%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.69	2.77 -3%	3.34 -24%	3.86 -43%	2.48 8%
Gamma	2.37 ^93%	2.28 ^96%	2.4 ^92%	2.53 ^87%	2.37 ^93%
CCT	6455 ^101%	6284 ^103%	6213 ^105%	7229 ^90%	6854 ^95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	53	47 -11%	55 4%	63 19%	55 4%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	80	73 -9%	83 4%	97 21%	84 5%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		3% / 3%	12% / 10%	15% / 14%	15% / 13%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 8 ms rise
31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 23 ms rise
56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 33 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-D0DD Intel Core i7-7700HQ	152 Points +6%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T Intel Core i7-6700HQ	148 Points +3%
Gigabyte P55W v5 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	144 Points +1%
Gigabyte P55W v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	143 Points
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q Intel Core i7-6700HQ	143 Points 0%
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro Intel Core i7-6700HQ	139 Points -3%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T Intel Core i7-6700HQ	680 Points +1%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-D0DD Intel Core i7-7700HQ	677 Points +1%
Gigabyte P55W v5 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	675 Points 0%
Gigabyte P55W v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	673 Points
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro Intel Core i7-6700HQ	667 Points -1%
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q Intel Core i7-6700HQ	661 Points -2%

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

5093

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

20092

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

6851

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.57 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

7.37 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

63.1 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

143 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

673 Points

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)	4741 Points +18%
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, LiteOn CV1-8B512	4692 Points +17%
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	4060 Points +1%
Gigabyte P55W v6 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 128GB M.2 (TS128GMTS800)	4014 Points
Gigabyte P55W v5 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV128 NVMe	3832 Points -5%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-D0DD GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)	3698 Points -8%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)	5109 Points +7%
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, LiteOn CV1-8B512	5088 Points +6%
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	4859 Points +2%
Gigabyte P55W v5 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV128 NVMe	4852 Points +1%
Gigabyte P55W v6 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 128GB M.2 (TS128GMTS800)	4784 Points

PCMark 7 Score		5715 points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4014 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		4897 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4784 points
Help

... in comparison

	Gigabyte P55W v6 Transcend MTS800 128GB M.2 (TS128GMTS800)	Gigabyte P55W v5 Samsung SM951 MZVPV128 NVMe	Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)	MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	Acer Aspire VX5-591G-D0DD SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)	Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q LiteOn CV1-8B512
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		166%	53%	298%	50%	55%
Read Seq	511	1356 165%	462.5 -9%	1973 286%	494.2 -3%	517 1%
Write Seq	161.1	657 308%	462.7 187%	1292 702%	449.6 179%	449.7 179%
Read 512	338	1044 209%	335 -1%	1279 278%	348.1 3%	355.3 5%
Write 512	160.8	642 299%	407.1 153%	1288 701%	418.2 160%	433.7 170%
Read 4k	26.2	50.8 94%	25.61 -2%	52.3 100%	16.97 -35%	27.69 6%
Write 4k	76.7	142.7 86%	86.3 13%	153.2 100%	38.36 -50%	72.9 -5%
Read 4k QD32	264.7	588 122%	246.7 -7%	464.4 75%	394.9 49%	290.9 10%
Write 4k QD32	160.3	236.3 47%	301.5 88%	384.4 140%	317.4 98%	273.8 71%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Transcend MTS800 128GB M.2 (TS128GMTS800)

Sequential Read: 511 MB/s

Sequential Write: 161.1 MB/s

512K Read: 338 MB/s

512K Write: 160.8 MB/s

4K Read: 26.2 MB/s

4K Write: 76.7 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 264.7 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 160.3 MB/s

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	101041 Points +45%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	78820 Points +13%
Gigabyte P55W v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	69528 Points
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	69253 Points 0%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-D0DD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	48626 Points -30%
Gigabyte P55W v5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M	48597 Points -30%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	17175 Points +50%
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	11730 Points +3%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	11622 Points +2%
Gigabyte P55W v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	11422 Points
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-D0DD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	7741 Points -32%
Gigabyte P55W v5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M	7450 Points -35%

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	22246 Points +50%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	15387 Points +4%
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	15075 Points +2%
Gigabyte P55W v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	14792 Points
Gigabyte P55W v5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M	9910 Points -33%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-D0DD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	9713 Points -34%

3DMark 11 Performance		12433 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		22706 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		9527 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		4963 points
Help

... in comparison

The Witcher 3 | Deus Ex Mankind Divided | BioShock Infinite

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	60 fps +59%
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	40.4 fps +7%
Gigabyte P55W v6 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	37.8 fps
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-D0DD GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ	25.5 fps -33%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	110.8 fps +75%
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	74.6 fps +18%
Gigabyte P55W v6 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	63.3 fps
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-D0DD GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ	37.3 fps -41%

Deus Ex Mankind Divided
1920x1080 High Preset AF:4x
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	81.3 fps +49%
Gigabyte P55W v6 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	54.6 fps
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	49.1 fps -10%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:2xMS AF:8x
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	43.2 fps +54%
Gigabyte P55W v6 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	28 fps
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	26.9 fps -4%

BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	102.3 fps +3%
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	101.8 fps +2%
Gigabyte P55W v6 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	99.7 fps
Gigabyte P55W v5 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	69.7 fps -30%

	low	med.	high	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	189	176.2	151.7	99.7
The Witcher 3 (2015)	166.1	127.2	63.3	37.8
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016)	116.1	98.4	54.6	28

Noise Level

Idle		35 / 36 / 37 dB(A)
HDD		37 dB(A)
DVD		39 / dB(A)
Load		41 / 52 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 31 dB(A)

	Gigabyte P55W v6 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	Gigabyte P55W v5 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
Noise		4%	3%	8%	3%
off / environment *	31		31 -0%	30 3%	30 3%
Idle Minimum *	35	33 6%	32 9%	32 9%	31 11%
Idle Average *	36	34 6%	33 8%	33 8%	35 3%
Idle Maximum *	37	35 5%	34 8%	34 8%	38 -3%
Load Average *	41	43 -5%	44 -7%	37 10%	43 -5%
Load Maximum *	52	49 6%	53 -2%	46 12%	49 6%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load

Idle


46.5 °C	44.7 °C	31.5 °C
47.7 °C	46.7 °C	32 °C
45.2 °C	44.7 °C	29.4 °C

Maximum: 47.7 °C
Average: 40.9 °C


28 °C	43.1 °C	51.2 °C
30.9 °C	46 °C	48.6 °C
29.2 °C	46.3 °C	49.1 °C

Maximum: 51.2 °C
Average: 41.4 °C

Power Supply (max.) 42.3 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.7 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51.2 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 45.2 °C / 113.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-16.3 °C / -29.4 F).

	Gigabyte P55W v6 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	Gigabyte P55W v5 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
Heat		5%	-17%	5%	18%
Maximum Upper Side *	47.7	50 -5%	65.3 -37%	45.3 5%	40.5 15%
Maximum Bottom *	51.2	57.7 -13%	64.4 -26%	62.6 -22%	42 18%
Idle Upper Side *	32.1	25.7 20%	35.4 -10%	25.3 21%	28.2 12%
Idle Bottom *	32.8	27.2 17%	31.6 4%	27.3 17%	24.3 26%

* ... smaller is better

Gigabyte P55W v6 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 89% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.1% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (18.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.3 Watt
Idle	8 / 13 / 17 Watt
Load	71 / 165 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Voltcraft VC 940

	Gigabyte P55W v6 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	Gigabyte P55W v5 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
Power Consumption		-4%	-34%	-56%	-65%
Idle Minimum *	8	9 -13%	16 -100%	18 -125%	18 -125%
Idle Average *	13	13 -0%	19 -46%	22 -69%	24 -85%
Idle Maximum *	17	17 -0%	23 -35%	30 -76%	29 -71%
Load Average *	71	81 -14%	68 4%	77 -8%	86 -21%
Load Maximum *	165	152 8%	157 5%	165 -0%	201 -22%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		10h 10min
WiFi Websurfing		5h 52min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		5h 38min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 35min

	Gigabyte P55W v6 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, 63 Wh	Gigabyte P55W v5 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, 61 Wh	Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, 64 Wh	MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, 65 Wh	Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Wh
Battery Runtime		-2%	-31%	-30%	-4%
Reader / Idle	610	604 -1%	315 -48%	358 -41%
H.264	338	332 -2%	235 -30%	271 -20%	298 -12%
WiFi v1.3	352	348 -1%	220 -37%	210 -40%	285 -19%
Load	95	93 -2%	87 -8%	76 -20%	114 20%

Pros

+ 游戏性价比高

+ 优秀的输入设备

+ 长电池续航

Cons

- 屏幕缺少对比度

- 固态硬盘速度较慢

- 负载下十分吵

In review: Gigabyte P55W v6. Test model courtesy of Gigabyte Germany

技嘉P55W的不同机型几乎都在性能和价位上实现了巧妙的平衡——这次的第六版也是如此。从GeForce GTX 970到GTX 1060的升级带来了接近50%的3D性能提升，而它的价位并没有改变（1600欧元，约11711人民币）。”低价高效“可以说是对它的完美形容。

它的外观也完全没有改变——它的机身和合理的物理接口搭配，非常优秀的输入设备和中规中矩的扬声器都一如既往。这一次技嘉采用了一块Skylake处理器搭配16GB内存，因此它的系统性能足够应对大型软件。它的电池续航也没有受到什么影响。

相比前代机型，这台新设备在一部分方面有所退步。它的屏幕对比度相比更低，亮度分布也不如前代机型均匀。这让我们十分惊讶，因为它的屏幕型号和类型都完全相同。P55W v5所搭配的极速三星固态硬盘也换成了速度慢了许多的创见固态硬盘。它的噪音控制也相比差了不少，特别是在最高负载下时高时低的噪音十分烦人。

综合考虑，P55W v6是基于前代机型的成功更新，它的整体表现不错——而在1600欧元（约11711人民币）的价位上用户可以得到非常不错的3D性能。配置相同的华硕Strix GL502VM是唯一在性价比上可以与它抗衡的机型。不需要这么高游戏性能的用户可以节省不少，值得参考的机型包括售价约1000欧元（约7319人民币）的宏碁Aspire VX5-591G。需要比P55W v6更高性能的游戏玩家则需要准备出更多的预算：如宏碁Predator 15 G9-593售价达到了接近2500欧元（约18298人民币）。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Gigabyte P55W v6 - 2017-01-31 01/31/2017 v6 ^(old)
Oliver Moebel

Chassis

82 / 98 → 83%

Keyboard

81%

Pointing Device

75%

Connectivity

50 / 81 → 62%

Weight

59 / 10-66 → 88%

Battery

85%

Display

85%

Games Performance

91%

Application Performance

89%

Temperature

83 / 95 → 88%

Noise

64 / 90 → 71%

Audio

70%

Average

76%

82%

Gaming - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Bernie Pechlaner - Senior Tech Writer - 276 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2012

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 技嘉 P55W v6 笔记本电脑简短评测

Oliver Moebel, 2017-02-11 (Update: 2017-02-11)