技嘉 P57X v7 游戏笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: Gigabyte P57X v7
Brand: Gigabyte

略有进步。自从我们最早评测P57X以来它并没有过太大的改变。不过一颗最新Kaby Lake处理器，更大容量内存和一块大幅改进的4K屏幕，可以让它更值得考虑吗？

Steve Schardein (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 02/05/2017 🇺🇸 🇳🇱 ...

Windows Laptop / Notebook Kaby Lake Gaming Geforce

Test device courtesy of Gigabyte

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Gigabyte P57X v7 (P57 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i7-7700HQ 4 x 2.8 - 3.8 GHz, Kaby Lake

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1645 MHz, RAM: 8000 MHz, 21.21.13.7586 - nVIDIA ForceWare 375.86

Memory

32 GB

, DDR4-2400, 双通道 (16 GB x 2)

Display

17.30 inch 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 255 PPI, 无, SHP145E, IPS, glossy: no

Storage

Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800), 256 GB

Soundcard

Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller

Connections

3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 耳机／麦克风接口, Card Reader: SD

Networking

Realtek Gaming GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2

Optical drive

HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUD0N

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 31 x 418 x 296

Battery

75.81 Wh Lithium-Polymer

Camera

Webcam: 高清 720p
Primary Camera: 1 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: 2 x 2瓦扬声器, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

3.412 kg, Power Supply: 938 g

Links

Gigabyte homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG Gigabyte P57X v7 Gigabyte P57X v6 EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 DIN A4 ❌

Left: Kensington Lock, Gigabit Ethernet, USB 3.0 x 2, SD card reader, headphones, microphone

Right: USB 3.0, USB 3.1 Type-C, HDMI, mini-DP (beneath removable cover), VGA, charging port

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296	166 MB/s +112%
Gigabyte P57X v7	78.2 MB/s
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG	78 MB/s 0%
Gigabyte P57X v6	76.4 MB/s -2%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296	224 MB/s +148%
Gigabyte P57X v7	90.4 MB/s
Gigabyte P57X v6	89.9 MB/s -1%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG	88 MB/s -3%

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m 512KB
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	507 MBit/s +4%
Gigabyte P57X v7 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	487 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 512KB
Gigabyte P57X v7 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	619 MBit/s
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	497 MBit/s -20%


385.3 cd/m²	430.2 cd/m²	407.3 cd/m²
380.5 cd/m²	441.3 cd/m²	402.6 cd/m²
395.9 cd/m²	425.8 cd/m²	400 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

SHP145E tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2

Maximum: 441.3 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 407.7 cd/m² Minimum: 14.29 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 441.3 cd/m²
Contrast: 1003:1 (Black: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
87% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
98.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
87.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.08

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Gigabyte P57X v7 SHP145E, IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160	Gigabyte P57X v6 LGD0469, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080	Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160	MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN LED, 17.3", 1920x1080	EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 Sharp LQ173D1JW31, IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160
Display		-23%	0%	-4%	-0%
Display P3 Coverage	87.8	68 -23%	86.9 -1%	90.6 3%	87.3 -1%
sRGB Coverage	100	87.5 -12%	100 0%	99.9 0%	100 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	98.9	64 -35%	99.4 1%	84.7 -14%	98.8 0%
Response Times		43%	41%	69%	16%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	55.6 ?(18.4, 37.2)	33.6 ?(14, 19.6) 40%	37 ?(13, 24) 33%	26 ?(12, 14) 53%	45.6 ?(22.8, 22.8) 18%
Response Time Black / White *	46.8 ?(10.4, 36.4)	25.6 ?(5.2, 20.4) 45%	24 ?(5, 19) 49%	7 ?(4, 3) 85%	35.2 ?(9.2, 26) 25%
PWM Frequency	1000 ?(29)				1042 ?(29) 4%
Screen		-11%	9%	-30%	2%
Brightness middle	441.3	329.2 -25%	336 -24%	307 -30%	399.1 -10%
Brightness	408	321 -21%	320 -22%	284 -30%	360 -12%
Brightness Distribution	86	93 8%	88 2%	85 -1%	81 -6%
Black Level *	0.44	0.267 39%	0.25 43%	0.25 43%	0.4 9%
Contrast	1003	1233 23%	1344 34%	1228 22%	998 0%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.1	5.93 -16%	3.61 29%	9.65 -89%	4.78 6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	9.8	11.07 -13%	6.02 39%	16.36 -67%	7.65 22%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.3	6.72 -56%	4.78 -11%	10.07 -134%	3.8 12%
Gamma	2.08 ^106%	2.12 ^104%	2.32 ^95%	2.12 ^104%	2.03 ^108%
CCT	7345 ^88%	7611 ^85%	6185 ^105%	12145 ^54%	7288 ^89%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	87	57 -34%	88 1%	75 -14%	86.9 0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	100	87 -13%	100 0%	100 0%	100 0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		3% / -6%	17% / 12%	12% / -12%	6% / 4%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
46.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 10.4 ms rise
46.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 36.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 99 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
55.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18.4 ms rise
55.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 37.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

1000 Hz

≤ 29 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 1000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 29 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 1000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R15 | wPrime 2.10 | Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 Intel Core i7-7820HK	1.95 Points +14%
Gigabyte P57X v7 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1.71 Points
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 Intel Core i7-6820HK	1.68 Points -2%
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1.5 Points -12%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 Intel Core i7-7820HK	9.6 Points +19%
Gigabyte P57X v7 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	8.04 Points
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 Intel Core i7-6820HK	7.75 Points -4%
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	7.44 Points -7%

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 Intel Core i7-7820HK	172 Points +13%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 Intel Core i7-6820HK	152 Points 0%
Gigabyte P57X v7 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	152 Points
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG Intel Core i7-6700HQ	141 Points -7%
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	140 Points -8%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 Intel Core i7-7820HK	864 Points +17%
Gigabyte P57X v7 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	736 Points
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 Intel Core i7-6820HK	706 Points -4%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG Intel Core i7-6700HQ	656 Points -11%
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	635 Points -14%

wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	374.4 s * -10%
Gigabyte P57X v7 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	340.3 s *
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 Intel Core i7-6820HK	224.7 s * +34%

Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 Intel Core i7-6820HK	572 s * -5%
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	553 s * -1%
Gigabyte P57X v7 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	546 s *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.71 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

8.04 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

62.5 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

152 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

736 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

93.9 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	4437 Points +24%
Gigabyte P57X v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	4206 Points +18%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	4060 Points +14%
Gigabyte P57X v7 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	3569 Points
Work Score Accelerated v2
Gigabyte P57X v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	5014 Points +19%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	4623 Points +10%
Gigabyte P57X v7 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	4218 Points
Creative Score Accelerated v2
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	7780 Points +51%
Gigabyte P57X v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	5192 Points +1%
Gigabyte P57X v7 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	5161 Points
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	2303 Points -55%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3569 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		5161 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4218 points
Help

	Gigabyte P57X v7 Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	Gigabyte P57X v6 Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL (RAID 0)	EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-2%	352%	174%
Read Seq	517	481.7 -7%	3219 523%	1658 221%
Write Seq	305.7	315.4 3%	2572 741%	1249 309%
Read 512	315	303.1 -4%	1776 464%	1044 231%
Write 512	306.1	314.4 3%	2445 699%	1254 310%
Read 4k	26.04	25.93 0%	51.1 96%	51.6 98%
Write 4k	82.3	84.6 3%	141.3 72%	145.2 76%
Read 4k QD32	281.3	273.9 -3%	658 134%	601 114%
Write 4k QD32	296	274.9 -7%	554 87%	386.8 31%

HD Tune

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)

Transfer Rate Minimum: 359.5 MB/s

Transfer Rate Maximum: 411.8 MB/s

Transfer Rate Average: 400.7 MB/s

Access Time: 0.1 ms

Burst Rate: 83.3 MB/s

CPU Usage: 2.3 %

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK	28675 Points +23%
Gigabyte P57X v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	23356 Points 0%
Gigabyte P57X v7 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	23243 Points
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	22427 Points -4%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	21228 Points -9%
1280x720 Performance Combined
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK	10945 Points +20%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	9550 Points +5%
Gigabyte P57X v7 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	9116 Points
Gigabyte P57X v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	8366 Points -8%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	7795 Points -14%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK	127933 Points +70%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	100453 Points +34%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	84341 Points +12%
Gigabyte P57X v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	79578 Points +6%
Gigabyte P57X v7 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	75190 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK	21026 Points +22%
Gigabyte P57X v7 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	17170 Points
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	17106 Points 0%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	15718 Points -8%
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics
Gigabyte P57X v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	8357 Points +1%
Gigabyte P57X v7 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	8236 Points
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	8057 Points -2%
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
Gigabyte P57X v7 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	4005 Points
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	3957 Points -1%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	258199 Points +123%
Gigabyte P57X v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	123302 Points +6%
Gigabyte P57X v7 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	116033 Points

3DMark 06 Standard Score		28053 points
3DMark 11 Performance		16753 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		24337 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		13444 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		7498 points
Help

... in comparison

Batman: Arkham Knight - 3840x2160 High / On (Interactive Smoke & Paper Debris Off) AA:SM AF:8x (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v7 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	47 fps
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	45 fps -4%

Mafia 2 - 1920x1080 high AA:0x AF:16x (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v7 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	156.3 fps

Rise of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v7 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	43 fps
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	37.4 fps -13%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	40.6 fps -6%

Sleeping Dogs - 1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:Extreme (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v7 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	116.3 fps

Fallout 4 - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:T AF:16x (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v7 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	42 fps
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	44.3 fps +5%

BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v7 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	130 fps
Gigabyte P57X v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	123.8 fps -5%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	131.8 fps +1%

	ultra	4K
Mafia 2 (2010)	156.3
Sleeping Dogs (2012)	116.3
BioShock Infinite (2013)	130
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015)		47
Fallout 4 (2015)		42
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)		43

Noise Level

Idle		30.4 / 32.1 / 32.1 dB(A)
Load		45.6 / 51.5 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm distance) environment noise: 29 dB(A)

	Gigabyte P57X v7 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	Gigabyte P57X v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL (RAID 0)	EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
Noise		-4%	-7%	-6%	-4%
off / environment *	29	29.7 -2%	31 -7%	30 -3%	29.2 -1%
Idle Minimum *	30.4	33.2 -9%	33 -9%	34 -12%	33.9 -12%
Idle Average *	32.1	33.2 -3%	34 -6%	35 -9%	33.9 -6%
Idle Maximum *	32.1	33.2 -3%	40 -25%	37 -15%	33.9 -6%
Load Average *	45.6	47.5 -4%	44 4%	39 14%	43.8 4%
Load Maximum *	51.5	52.5 -2%	50 3%	56 -9%	53.4 -4%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load

Idle


26.8 °C	51.2 °C	39.2 °C
27.8 °C	38.8 °C	41.4 °C
23.6 °C	21.6 °C	20.4 °C

Maximum: 51.2 °C
Average: 32.3 °C


35.8 °C	56.8 °C	27 °C
27.4 °C	28 °C	21.8 °C
20.8 °C	21 °C	22.8 °C

Maximum: 56.8 °C
Average: 29 °C

Power Supply (max.) 53 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51.2 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 56.8 °C / 134 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 23.6 °C / 74.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+5.3 °C / 9.5 F).

Gigabyte P57X v7 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.37 / 0.8 Watt
Idle	15.7 / 23.4 / 23.5 Watt
Load	184.6 / 233.1 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Gigabyte P57X v7 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"	Gigabyte P57X v6 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"	MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL (RAID 0), TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3"	EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"
Power Consumption		-2%	-31%	-38%	-32%
Idle Minimum *	15.7	18.4 -17%	25 -59%	29 -85%	27.3 -74%
Idle Average *	23.4	22.8 3%	35 -50%	35 -50%	34.9 -49%
Idle Maximum *	23.5	24 -2%	46 -96%	40 -70%	37.6 -60%
Load Average *	184.6	175.5 5%	103 44%	94 49%	164.4 11%
Load Maximum *	233.1	229.5 2%	223 4%	315 -35%	202.5 13%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		4h 16min
WiFi Websurfing		2h 35min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 38min

	Gigabyte P57X v7 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 75.81 Wh	Gigabyte P57X v6 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 75.81 Wh	Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 88 Wh	MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 75.2 Wh	EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 74.48 Wh
Battery Runtime		33%	10%	3%	-15%
Reader / Idle	256	418 63%	278 9%		242 -5%
WiFi v1.3	155	201 30%	200 29%	160 3%	160 3%
Load	98	103 5%	89 -9%		55 -44%

Pros

+ 强劲的显卡性能；大部分游戏可以在4K高设定下运行

+ 迅速的系统响应

+ 大幅改进的4K屏幕

+ 不错的平均运行温度

+ 实用的系统管理软件

+ 作为17.3寸设备相对便携

+ 拓展插槽十分实用

Cons

- 塑料机身（测试机上有裂痕）

- 较差的触控版按键

- 在负载下有两个较烫的位置，键盘略热

- 相对噪音较大，相比v6稍有改善

- 电池续航相比以前明显缩短

In review: Gigabyte P57X v7. Test model provided by Gigabyte.

实话实说，相比前代P57X v6最新的v7并没有什么太大的变化。它们采用了同样的机身（塑料，相对轻盈便携），相似的布局和内部组件，相同的接口，甚至相同的显卡和固态硬盘。v7的最大（可以感觉到的）区别应该是搭配了Kaby Lake酷睿 i7-7700HQ处理器，更高分辨率的高品质4K屏幕，和翻倍的内存（同时内存频率也有所提高）。

整体上，尽管市场上还有不少速度更快、品质更高的游戏本，但技嘉P57X v7依然是一台搭配了绚丽屏幕的强劲设备。

除此之外，它还有了相对更低的风扇噪音和发热量（尽管仍然在一些位置温度很高），和大幅提升的屏幕品质带来的画质飞跃（更高的亮度，色域覆盖和分辨率）。不过，前代机型的一些缺点也依然存在。它的机身品质有些难登大雅之堂，屏幕上盖显得十分单薄。它也依然十分吵（尽管搭配了易用的风扇控制软件），同时触控版还是低于平均水平。电池续航相比前代机型反而退步，尽管它搭配了更高分辨率的屏幕和更大容量内存，功耗的数据依然有些高得出乎我们意料。当然它仍然是一台游戏笔记本电脑，电池续航并不是最重要的方面。

它屏幕的响应速度并不算快，这可能会对一些射击游戏和其他需要快速反应的游戏带来负面的影响。对于其他类型的游戏，这倒不是太大的问题（接近连接电视玩游戏）。选择1080p面板可以一定程度上缓解这些问题（v6的屏幕响应速度更快），鱼与熊掌不可兼得。

整体上，尽管市场上还有不少速度更快、品质更高的游戏本，但技嘉P57X v7依然是一台搭配了绚丽屏幕的强劲设备。它可以轻松应对大部分的挑战，同时对未来的升级也有不小预留空间。如果你不打算长时间用电池也不在意品质一般的机身和触控版的话，它是个不错的选择。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Gigabyte P57X v7 - 2017-04-25 04/25/2017 v6 ^(old)
Steve Schardein

Chassis

74 / 98 → 76%

Keyboard

79%

Pointing Device

67%

Connectivity

67 / 81 → 83%

Weight

54 / 10-66 → 79%

Battery

67%

Display

88%

Games Performance

95%

Application Performance

86%

Workstation

75%

Temperature

88 / 95 → 93%

Noise

76 / 90 → 84%

Audio

40%

Camera

69 / 85 → 81%

Average

73%

82%

Gaming - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Steve Schardein - Tech Writer - 98 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2012

contact me via: @othersteve, LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 技嘉 P57X v7 游戏笔记本电脑简短评测

Steve Schardein, 2017-02- 5 (Update: 2020-06- 8)