技嘉 P57X v7 游戏笔记本电脑简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 | |
Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 | |
Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG |
Networking | |
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m 512KB | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 512KB | |
Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 |
|
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 441.3 cd/m²
Contrast: 1003:1 (Black: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
87% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
98.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
87.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.08
Gigabyte P57X v7 SHP145E, IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160 | Gigabyte P57X v6 LGD0469, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160 | MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN LED, 17.3", 1920x1080 | EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 Sharp LQ173D1JW31, IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -23% | 0% | -4% | -0% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 87.8 | 68 -23% | 86.9 -1% | 90.6 3% | 87.3 -1% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 87.5 -12% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 98.9 | 64 -35% | 99.4 1% | 84.7 -14% | 98.8 0% |
Response Times | 43% | 41% | 69% | 16% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 55.6 ? | 33.6 ? 40% | 37 ? 33% | 26 ? 53% | 45.6 ? 18% |
Response Time Black / White * | 46.8 ? | 25.6 ? 45% | 24 ? 49% | 7 ? 85% | 35.2 ? 25% |
PWM Frequency | 1000 ? | 1042 ? 4% | |||
Screen | -11% | 9% | -30% | 2% | |
Brightness middle | 441.3 | 329.2 -25% | 336 -24% | 307 -30% | 399.1 -10% |
Brightness | 408 | 321 -21% | 320 -22% | 284 -30% | 360 -12% |
Brightness Distribution | 86 | 93 8% | 88 2% | 85 -1% | 81 -6% |
Black Level * | 0.44 | 0.267 39% | 0.25 43% | 0.25 43% | 0.4 9% |
Contrast | 1003 | 1233 23% | 1344 34% | 1228 22% | 998 0% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.1 | 5.93 -16% | 3.61 29% | 9.65 -89% | 4.78 6% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.8 | 11.07 -13% | 6.02 39% | 16.36 -67% | 7.65 22% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.3 | 6.72 -56% | 4.78 -11% | 10.07 -134% | 3.8 12% |
Gamma | 2.08 106% | 2.12 104% | 2.32 95% | 2.12 104% | 2.03 108% |
CCT | 7345 88% | 7611 85% | 6185 105% | 12145 54% | 7288 89% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 87 | 57 -34% | 88 1% | 75 -14% | 86.9 0% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 87 -13% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 3% /
-6% | 17% /
12% | 12% /
-12% | 6% /
4% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
46.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.4 ms rise | |
↘ 36.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 99 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
55.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.4 ms rise | |
↘ 37.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1000 Hz | ≤ 29 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 1000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 29 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 | |
Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 | |
Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 |
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 |
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M | |
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
Gigabyte P57X v7 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3569 points | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5161 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4218 points | |
Help |
Gigabyte P57X v7 Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800) | Gigabyte P57X v6 Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800) | MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL (RAID 0) | EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -2% | 352% | 174% | |
Read Seq | 517 | 481.7 -7% | 3219 523% | 1658 221% |
Write Seq | 305.7 | 315.4 3% | 2572 741% | 1249 309% |
Read 512 | 315 | 303.1 -4% | 1776 464% | 1044 231% |
Write 512 | 306.1 | 314.4 3% | 2445 699% | 1254 310% |
Read 4k | 26.04 | 25.93 0% | 51.1 96% | 51.6 98% |
Write 4k | 82.3 | 84.6 3% | 141.3 72% | 145.2 76% |
Read 4k QD32 | 281.3 | 273.9 -3% | 658 134% | 601 114% |
Write 4k QD32 | 296 | 274.9 -7% | 554 87% | 386.8 31% |
3DMark 11 | |
1280x720 Performance GPU | |
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
1280x720 Performance Combined | |
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 | |
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 | |
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 | |
Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics | |
Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics | |
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
Gigabyte P57X v7 |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 28053 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 16753 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 24337 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 13444 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 7498 points | |
Help |
Batman: Arkham Knight - 3840x2160 High / On (Interactive Smoke & Paper Debris Off) AA:SM AF:8x (sort by value) | |
Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 |
Mafia 2 - 1920x1080 high AA:0x AF:16x (sort by value) | |
Gigabyte P57X v7 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x (sort by value) | |
Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 |
Sleeping Dogs - 1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:Extreme (sort by value) | |
Gigabyte P57X v7 |
Fallout 4 - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:T AF:16x (sort by value) | |
Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 |
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) (sort by value) | |
Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 |
low | med. | high | ultra | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mafia 2 (2010) | 156.3 | ||||
Sleeping Dogs (2012) | 116.3 | ||||
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 130 | ||||
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) | 47 | ||||
Fallout 4 (2015) | 42 | ||||
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 43 |
Noise Level
Idle |
| 30.4 / 32.1 / 32.1 dB(A) |
Load |
| 45.6 / 51.5 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm distance) environment noise: 29 dB(A) |
Gigabyte P57X v7 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800) | Gigabyte P57X v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800) | Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7 | MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL (RAID 0) | EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -4% | -7% | -6% | -4% | |
off / environment * | 29 | 29.7 -2% | 31 -7% | 30 -3% | 29.2 -1% |
Idle Minimum * | 30.4 | 33.2 -9% | 33 -9% | 34 -12% | 33.9 -12% |
Idle Average * | 32.1 | 33.2 -3% | 34 -6% | 35 -9% | 33.9 -6% |
Idle Maximum * | 32.1 | 33.2 -3% | 40 -25% | 37 -15% | 33.9 -6% |
Load Average * | 45.6 | 47.5 -4% | 44 4% | 39 14% | 43.8 4% |
Load Maximum * | 51.5 | 52.5 -2% | 50 3% | 56 -9% | 53.4 -4% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51.2 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 56.8 °C / 134 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 23.6 °C / 74.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+5.3 °C / 9.5 F).
Gigabyte P57X v7 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.37 / 0.8 Watt |
Idle | 15.7 / 23.4 / 23.5 Watt |
Load |
184.6 / 233.1 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Gigabyte P57X v7 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | Gigabyte P57X v6 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL (RAID 0), TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3" | EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -2% | -31% | -38% | -32% | |
Idle Minimum * | 15.7 | 18.4 -17% | 25 -59% | 29 -85% | 27.3 -74% |
Idle Average * | 23.4 | 22.8 3% | 35 -50% | 35 -50% | 34.9 -49% |
Idle Maximum * | 23.5 | 24 -2% | 46 -96% | 40 -70% | 37.6 -60% |
Load Average * | 184.6 | 175.5 5% | 103 44% | 94 49% | 164.4 11% |
Load Maximum * | 233.1 | 229.5 2% | 223 4% | 315 -35% | 202.5 13% |
* ... smaller is better
Gigabyte P57X v7 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 75.81 Wh | Gigabyte P57X v6 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 75.81 Wh | Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 88 Wh | MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 75.2 Wh | EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 74.48 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 33% | 10% | 3% | -15% | |
Reader / Idle | 256 | 418 63% | 278 9% | 242 -5% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 155 | 201 30% | 200 29% | 160 3% | 160 3% |
Load | 98 | 103 5% | 89 -9% | 55 -44% |
Pros
Cons
实话实说,相比前代P57X v6最新的v7并没有什么太大的变化。它们采用了同样的机身(塑料,相对轻盈便携),相似的布局和内部组件,相同的接口,甚至相同的显卡和固态硬盘。v7的最大(可以感觉到的)区别应该是搭配了Kaby Lake酷睿 i7-7700HQ处理器,更高分辨率的高品质4K屏幕,和翻倍的内存(同时内存频率也有所提高)。
整体上,尽管市场上还有不少速度更快、品质更高的游戏本,但技嘉P57X v7依然是一台搭配了绚丽屏幕的强劲设备。
除此之外,它还有了相对更低的风扇噪音和发热量(尽管仍然在一些位置温度很高),和大幅提升的屏幕品质带来的画质飞跃(更高的亮度,色域覆盖和分辨率)。不过,前代机型的一些缺点也依然存在。它的机身品质有些难登大雅之堂,屏幕上盖显得十分单薄。它也依然十分吵(尽管搭配了易用的风扇控制软件),同时触控版还是低于平均水平。电池续航相比前代机型反而退步,尽管它搭配了更高分辨率的屏幕和更大容量内存,功耗的数据依然有些高得出乎我们意料。当然它仍然是一台游戏笔记本电脑,电池续航并不是最重要的方面。
它屏幕的响应速度并不算快,这可能会对一些射击游戏和其他需要快速反应的游戏带来负面的影响。对于其他类型的游戏,这倒不是太大的问题(接近连接电视玩游戏)。选择1080p面板可以一定程度上缓解这些问题(v6的屏幕响应速度更快),鱼与熊掌不可兼得。
整体上,尽管市场上还有不少速度更快、品质更高的游戏本,但技嘉P57X v7依然是一台搭配了绚丽屏幕的强劲设备。它可以轻松应对大部分的挑战,同时对未来的升级也有不小预留空间。如果你不打算长时间用电池也不在意品质一般的机身和触控版的话,它是个不错的选择。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
Gigabyte P57X v7
- 04/25/2017 v6 (old)
Steve Schardein