华为 P9 Plus 智能手机简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
|
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 361 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.24
Huawei P9 Plus AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | Apple iPhone 6S Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Microsoft Lumia 950 XL AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.7" | Motorola Moto X Force AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.4" | Sony Xperia Z5 Premium IPS, 3840x2160, 5.5" | OnePlus 3 Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Huawei P9 IPS-NEO, JDI, 1920x1080, 5.2" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 53% | 36% | 21% | 19% | -20% | 12% | 29% | |
Brightness middle | 361 | 554 53% | 583 61% | 297 -18% | 337 -7% | 560 55% | 419 16% | 582 61% |
Brightness | 366 | 552 51% | 560 53% | 297 -19% | 336 -8% | 541 48% | 431 18% | 563 54% |
Brightness Distribution | 87 | 96 10% | 91 5% | 93 7% | 91 5% | 85 -2% | 84 -3% | 91 5% |
Black Level * | 0.46 | 0.45 | 0.38 | |||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.1 | 1.59 69% | 3.55 30% | 2.67 48% | 3.99 22% | 9.19 -80% | 4.1 20% | 4.4 14% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10 | 2.56 74% | 3.98 60% | 7.07 29% | 15.01 -50% | 12 -20% | 7.4 26% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.5 | 2.01 63% | 3.88 29% | 2.81 49% | 1.66 70% | 10.58 -92% | 3.3 40% | 4.8 13% |
Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2.01 109% | 2.2 100% | 2.08 106% | 2.32 95% | 2.7 81% | 2.1 105% | 2.2 100% |
CCT | 7388 88% | 6321 103% | 7280 89% | 6379 102% | 6584 99% | 9760 67% | 6550 99% | 6175 105% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 82.12 | 59.05 | 66.31 | 73.19 | 89.38 | 77.78 | ||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.98 | 92.8 | 99.79 | 100 | 99.44 | |||
Contrast | 1267 | 1244 | 1532 |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise | |
↘ 5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise | |
↘ 5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240.4 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
Huawei P9 | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
Motorola Moto X Force | |
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium |
Geekbench 3 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
Huawei P9 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Motorola Moto X Force | |
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
Huawei P9 | |
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
Motorola Moto X Force |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Huawei P9 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
Motorola Moto X Force | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
Motorola Moto X Force | |
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
Huawei P9 | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Huawei P9 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
Motorola Moto X Force | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Motorola Moto X Force | |
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
Huawei P9 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Motorola Moto X Force | |
Huawei P9 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Motorola Moto X Force | |
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
Huawei P9 | |
Huawei P9 Plus |
GFXBench | |
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Huawei P9 | |
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Huawei P9 | |
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Huawei P9 | |
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Huawei P9 | |
on screen Car Chase Onscreen | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Motorola Moto X Force | |
Huawei P9 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Motorola Moto X Force | |
Huawei P9 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium |
PCMark for Android | |
Work 2.0 battery life | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Huawei P9 | |
Work 2.0 performance score | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Huawei P9 | |
Work performance score | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Huawei P9 | |
Motorola Moto X Force | |
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
Motorola Moto X Force | |
Huawei P9 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
Huawei P9 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
Motorola Moto X Force | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
Huawei P9 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Motorola Moto X Force | |
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Huawei P9 Plus | |
Huawei P9 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
Motorola Moto X Force |
* ... smaller is better
Huawei P9 Plus 64 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | Motorola Moto X Force 32 GB eMMC Flash | Sony Xperia Z5 Premium 32 GB eMMC Flash | OnePlus 3 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | Huawei P9 32 GB eMMC Flash | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 42% | -11% | -41% | 60% | -12% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 284.3 | 487.3 71% | 252 -11% | 256.8 -10% | 408.7 44% | 281.3 -1% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 140.4 | 145.1 3% | 47.99 -66% | 99.4 -29% | 153.3 9% | 72.2 -49% |
Random Read 4KB | 39.33 | 86.7 120% | 22.55 -43% | 19.11 -51% | 137.6 250% | 39 -1% |
Random Write 4KB | 51.2 | 15.79 -69% | 19.78 -61% | 14.53 -72% | 18.23 -64% | 47.45 -7% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 62.5 | 76.4 22% | 79 26% | 55 -12% | ||
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 24.95 | 50.4 102% | 46.96 88% | 24.83 0% |
Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
Settings | Value | ||
high | 30 fps |
Dead Trigger 2 | |||
Settings | Value | ||
high | 56 fps |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.4 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Off / Standby | 0.09 / 0.62 Watt |
Idle | 0.87 / 1.2 / 1.27 Watt |
Load |
4.69 / 5.63 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Gossen Metrahit Energy |
Huawei P9 Plus Mali-T880 MP4, 1920x1080 | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, 2560x1440 | Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 1920x1080 | Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 2560x1440 | Motorola Moto X Force Adreno 430, 2560x1440 | Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Adreno 430, 3840x2160 | OnePlus 3 Adreno 530, 1920x1080 | Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -7% | -14% | -138% | -26% | -60% | -18% | -27% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.87 | 0.63 28% | 0.5 43% | 2.85 -228% | 0.96 -10% | 0.83 5% | 0.57 34% | 0.77 11% |
Idle Average * | 1.2 | 1.1 8% | 1.9 -58% | 2.95 -146% | 1.35 -13% | 2.36 -97% | 1.24 -3% | 2.36 -97% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.27 | 1.56 -23% | 2.2 -73% | 3.26 -157% | 1.4 -10% | 2.42 -91% | 1.36 -7% | 2.37 -87% |
Load Average * | 4.69 | 5.95 -27% | 3.2 32% | 8.92 -90% | 6.11 -30% | 7.27 -55% | 5.92 -26% | 3.09 34% |
Load Maximum * | 5.63 | 6.7 -19% | 6.4 -14% | 9.39 -67% | 9.43 -67% | 9.18 -63% | 10.53 -87% | 5.35 5% |
* ... smaller is better
Huawei P9 Plus Wh, 3400 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 13.86 Wh, 3600 mAh | Apple iPhone 6S Plus 10 Wh, 2750 mAh | Microsoft Lumia 950 XL 13 Wh, 3340 mAh | Motorola Moto X Force Wh, 3760 mAh | Sony Xperia Z5 Premium 13 Wh, 3430 mAh | OnePlus 3 Wh, 3000 mAh | Huawei P9 11.46 Wh, 3000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 30% | -6% | -27% | 2% | -27% | 16% | -9% | |
Reader / Idle | 1446 | 1663 15% | 1655 14% | 1078 -25% | 1610 11% | 1277 -12% | 1338 -7% | 1514 5% |
H.264 | 776 | 914 18% | 714 -8% | 611 -21% | 710 -9% | 411 -47% | 847 9% | 568 -27% |
WiFi v1.3 | 530 | 732 38% | 513 -3% | 369 -30% | 426 -20% | 372 -30% | 840 58% | 569 7% |
Load | 263 | 392 49% | 197 -25% | 179 -32% | 330 25% | 210 -20% | 268 2% | 206 -22% |
Pros
Cons
华为P9 Plus不仅是标准P9的大屏版本。生产商不仅为Plus机型搭配了尺寸更大的屏幕和更大容量的电池,它也提供了几项新功能,采用了不同的屏幕技术。红外传输和额外的扬声器对于一部分用户来说也会很实用,不过压力触控功能对安卓系统来说仍然处于实践阶段。目前,相关菜单直有在华为自己的应用中得到了支持。我们认为这项功能在浏览相片时对放大比例特别实用,对它的支持度应该会随时间而慢慢改进。最大的问题是P9 Plus是否相比标准P9值得支出额外的130欧元(约961人民币)。这个问题并不容易回答,因为它们在核心功能上几乎相同,如机身、连接性、相机、通话品质和性能。如果考虑到所有的改进(两倍存储空间,更大工作内存,更大屏幕,更大电池,额外功能),它高出的价码应该算是合理,这也是我们认为两款机型都值得推荐的原因。
华为P9 Plus相比标准P9较高的售价十分合理。我们得到了一台出色的高端智能手机,它在许多方面都表现优异,这台中国智能手机只有在视频拍摄功能上让我们有些失望。
P9 Plus的700欧元(约5175人民币)显然不算便宜,不过这台智能手机相比竞争对手丝毫不占劣势。只有视频品质(不支持4K)和显卡性能相比一些竞争对手略微落后,不过后者在实际使用中几乎察觉不到。尽管提供了额外功能,P9 Plus仍然得到了相比P9略低的总分,这主要是稍差的屏幕表现(包括闪烁亮度控制)的缘故。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
Huawei P9 Plus
- 07/01/2016 v5.1 (old)
Andreas Osthoff