Notebookcheck Logo
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro (image source: Daniel Schmidt)

这个价格几乎买不到更多的智能手机了：小米 Poco F7 Pro 评测

第二排的科技巨头

小米 Poco F7 Pro 并非在所有方面都是最好的，但它提供了一个强大的整体组合，包括一个超亮的 AMOLED 屏幕、一块特别大的电池和一个强大的骁龙 8 代 3。唯一阻碍它跻身顶级智能手机行列的是变焦摄像头和无线充电等功能。
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

小米 Poco F7 Pro 的评价

小米 Poco F7 Pro 的价格比许多旗舰智能手机低得多，但在许多方面的功能却不相上下。首先是它的 SoC 性能，其真彩色和超亮 AMOLED 屏幕也给我们留下了深刻印象。此外，它的电池续航时间长，充电时间短，手机的 5000 万像素摄像头能拍出清晰的照片，支持当前的无线标准，并保证更新至 2031 年，因此从长远来看，Poco F7 Pro 也值得购买。

当然，与顶级智能手机的差距依然存在。它没有无线充电功能，不支持 eSIM 卡，摄像头只能进行数字变焦。

Pros

+ 快速 SoC
+ 超亮 AMOLED 屏幕
+ 超长运行时间
+ 90 瓦快速充电
+ IP68 认证
+ 50 万像素双摄像头和 OIS
+ 更新至 2031 年

Cons

- 不支持无线充电
- 不支持 eSIM 卡
- Android 版本升级只能持续到 2029 年

价格和供应情况

在撰写本文时，您可以从亚马逊以 679.99 美元的价格订购 Poco F7 Pro（512 GB）。

小米发布了 Poco F7 Pro，据称这是一款全新的 "杀手级旗舰"。这款装备精良的 6.67 英寸智能手机配备了 120 Hz AMOLED 屏幕，并搭载了速度极快的 骁龙 8 代 3.它还配备了防水外壳、6000 毫安时电池、90 瓦充电和分辨率为 5000 万像素的双摄像头。

在这篇评测中，我们将了解 Poco F7 Pro 是否真的是一款旗舰替代产品，以及它在与同价位中端智能手机的对比中表现如何。

规格

Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro (Poco F7 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 8 x 2.3 - 3.3 GHz, Cortex-X4 / A720 / A720 / A520 (Kryo)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 750
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5X
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 3200 x 1440 pixel 526 PPI, capacitive, AMOLED, Gorilla Glass 7i, WQHD+, 3200 nits max. brightness, 480 Hz touch sampling rate, 2160 Hz instant touch sampling rate (in-game), PWM dimming up to 3840 Hz; supported refresh rates: 60, 90, 120 Hz, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash, 512 GB 
, 484.1 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity sensor, Accelerometer, Electronic compass, Gyroscope, IR blaster, Flicker sensor, X-axis linear vibration motor, Miracast, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3
Networking
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (Band 2/3/5/8), 3G (Band 1/2/4/5/6/8/19), 4G (Band 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/18/19/20/26/28/38/40/41/42/48/66), 5G (Band 1/2/3/5/7/8/20/28/38/40/41/48/66/77/78); supports 4x4 MIMO, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.12 x 160.26 x 74.95
Battery
6000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 90W max. charging speed
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (Light Fusion 800, f/1.6, 1/1.55" sensor size, 24mm, OIS, 20x digital zoom) + 8MP ultrawide (f/2.2, 15mm); video recording up to 8K@24fps, 4K@60fps
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix video recording up to 1080p@60fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: virtual, USB-C cable, SIM Eject Tool, Protective Case, Quick Start Guide, Warranty Card, HyperOS 2.0, 12 Months Warranty, Head SAR 0.99 W/kg, Body SAR 0.99 W/kg; HDR support: HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG; Bluetooth Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, LDAC, LHDC V1-V5; GPS: GPS (L1, L5), Galileo (E1, E5a), Glonass (L1), Beidou (B1I, B1C, B2a), QZSS (L1, L5), NavIC (L5), fanless, waterproof
Weight
206 g
Price
650 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳 - 配有大猩猩 7i 玻璃的 Poco F7 Pro

小米将 Poco F7 Pro 装入金属边框中，两侧使用大猩猩 7i 玻璃进行保护。遗憾的是，指纹很快就会积聚在后盖上的摄像头模块区域。另一方面，AMOLED 面板的边框非常纤薄，206 克的重量让做工精良的 Poco F7 Pro 拿起来非常舒适。其外壳符合 IP68 防尘防水标准。

小米提供三种颜色的智能手机。除了我们测试设备的黑色配色外，还有蓝色和银色。

小米 Poco F7 Pro（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
小米 Poco F7 Pro（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
小米 Poco F7 Pro（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
小米 Poco F7 Pro（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
小米 Poco F7 Pro（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
小米 Poco F7 Pro（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
小米 Poco F7 Pro（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
小米 Poco F7 Pro（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）

尺寸比较

❌
161.1 mm 72.4 mm 8.6 mm 197 g160.86 mm 74.95 mm 8.21 mm 209 g160.26 mm 74.95 mm 8.12 mm 206 g152.8 mm 72 mm 8.5 mm 198 g146.9 mm 70.5 mm 7.2 mm 162 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性 - 红外遥控器、12 GB 内存和高达 512 GB 的存储空间

Poco F7 Pro 的最小存储版本为 256 GB，价格约为 680 美元；如果您选择 512 GB 版本，价格约为 730 美元。除了红外触发器、立体声扬声器和双卡双待功能外，您还将获得一个使用 USB 2.0 的 USB-C 端口。在我们使用外置固态硬盘三星便携式固态硬盘 T7 进行的复制测试中，它的速度只有 20.2 MB/s，即使按照 USB 2.0 的标准来看也是很慢的。

左：没有连接（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
左：没有连接（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
右：音量摇杆、电源按钮（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
右：音量摇杆、电源按钮（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
顶部：无连接（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
顶部：无连接（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
底部：扬声器、USB-C 2.0、麦克风、双 SIM 卡（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
底部：扬声器、USB-C 2.0、麦克风、双 SIM 卡（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）

软件 -Android 15 和 2031 年之前的更新

Poco F7 Pro 使用最新版本的小米内部操作系统，即 HyperOS 2.0，在我们的测试候选机中基于Android 15。系统预装了一些臃肿的软件，但你可以完全删除它们。

小米计划在 2031 年 3 月之前为其智能手机提供安全更新。而Android 版本升级则只能持续到 2029 年。

小米 Poco F7 Pro
小米 Poco F7 Pro
小米 Poco F7 Pro
小米 Poco F7 Pro
小米 Poco F7 Pro
小米 Poco F7 Pro

可持续性

关于智能手机中使用的可回收材料的比例，小米公司尚未提供任何确切信息。不过，据该制造商称，其智能手机部件中的再生铝、金和铜的用量有所增加。小米的目标是到 2025 年，从废弃产品中回收 38,000 吨电子垃圾。目前，这一目标已经实现了 44%。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 WiFi 7，但没有 6 GHz 频段

Poco F7 Pro 支持多个 5G 频段，因此在移动中不会出现任何接收问题。在短距离内，小米智能手机可通过蓝牙 5.4、NFC 和 WiFi 7 进行通信，但后者不支持 6 GHz 频段。在我们的测试中，小米智能手机在 5 GHz 频段内实现了基本稳定的 Wi-Fi 传输速率，峰值达到 988 MBit/s。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
  (987 - 1714, n=4)
1170 MBit/s +18%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Wi-Fi 7
1058 (518min - 1295max) MBit/s +7%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
988 (499min - 1016max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 9
Wi-Fi 7
955 (739min - 994max) MBit/s -3%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
818 (430min - 898max) MBit/s -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (49.8 - 1806, n=194, last 2 years)
720 MBit/s -27%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy S25
Wi-Fi 7
1167 (1006min - 1197max) MBit/s +44%
Average 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
  (812 - 1579, n=4)
1019 MBit/s +25%
Google Pixel 9
Wi-Fi 7
911 (857min - 930max) MBit/s +12%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
812 (768min - 826max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (52 - 1857, n=192, last 2 years)
710 MBit/s -13%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
664 (628min - 709max) MBit/s -18%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Google Pixel 9
Wi-Fi 7
1855 (1826min - 1894max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (521 - 1945, n=82, last 2 years)
1437 MBit/s
Average 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
  (578 - 1848, n=5)
1280 MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S25
Wi-Fi 7
1210 (998min - 1383max) MBit/s
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
863 (748min - 938max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Google Pixel 9
Wi-Fi 7
1851 (886min - 1889max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (451 - 1864, n=82, last 2 years)
1367 MBit/s
Average 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
  (719 - 1567, n=5)
1261 MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S25
Wi-Fi 7
1201 (1184min - 1221max) MBit/s
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
719 (637min - 785max) MBit/s
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S25 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1210 (998-1383)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1200 (1184-1221)
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø971 (499-1016)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1042 (518-1295)
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø811 (768-826)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1165 (1006-1197)
室内 GPS 接收
室内 GPS 接收
外部 GPS 接收
外部 GPS 接收

Poco F7 Pro 非常适合导航用途。在我们步行 4 公里的过程中，这款智能手机几乎与以精确度著称的 Garmin Venu 2 健身智能手表一样精确地为我们定位。

GPS 测试：总结
GPS 测试：总结
GPS 测试：池塘
GPS 测试：池塘
GPS 测试：路线
GPS 测试：路线

电话功能和通话质量 - 双 SIM 卡，不支持 eSIM 卡

Poco F7 Pro 有一个双 SIM 卡插槽，但不能激活 eSIM 卡。除了 VoLTE 外，它还支持 Wi-Fi 通话。

在我们的测试中，这款小米智能手机提供了良好的通话质量。即使使用免提模式，声音也能清晰地传输，其噪音抑制功能也能可靠地工作。

摄像头 - 双摄像头，分辨率为 50 万像素，配备 OIS

使用自拍相机拍摄的照片
使用自拍相机拍摄的照片

Poco F7 Pro 的自拍摄像头分辨率为 2000 万像素。它没有自动对焦功能，但能拍摄出不错的照片，并能以每秒 60 帧的速度录制最高 1080p 的视频。

该手机的 5000 万像素主摄像头在日光下也能为摄影师带来不错的拍摄效果。照片的细节略有欠缺，但色彩描绘自然，即使放大 5 倍也很清晰。即使在黑暗环境中，主摄像头也能捕捉到充足的光线。遗憾的是，该设备的超广角摄像头受到 800 万像素分辨率的限制，但仍能提供不错的拍摄质量。

主摄像头可录制稳定度良好的视频，最高可达每秒 24 帧的 8K（每秒 60 帧的 4K）。在视频录制过程中，您可以在主摄像头和超广角摄像头之间切换，最高分辨率可达 1080p，每秒 30 帧。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photoDaylight photoUltra-wide angle5x zoomLow-light photo
ColorChecker
10.5 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
9 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
5 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
3 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
1.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro: 7.45 ∆E min: 1.61 - max: 12.8 ∆E
ColorChecker
12.5 ∆E
16 ∆E
14 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
24.9 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
10 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
23.6 ∆E
26.5 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
20.8 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
21.9 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
21 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro: 17.9 ∆E min: 8.74 - max: 26.47 ∆E

配件和保修 - 可选 2 年设备保险

Poco F7 Pro 随附保护盖、USB 数据线、SIM 卡工具和快速入门指南。开箱即可使用屏幕保护膜。

小米手机的保修期为 12 个月，可通过 "小米关怀 "延长保修期。"小米关怀 "是一项为期 2 年的意外损坏和盗窃保险。附加费约为 67 美元（仅意外损坏）或 90 美元（意外损坏和盗窃）。

输入设备和操作 - 高速系统

在日常使用中，Poco F7 Pro 的系统速度非常快。支持 骁龙 8 代 3和 12GB RAM 的支持下，它处理输入的速度非常快。虽然从屏幕边缘向中间滑动时，屏幕保护膜会稍显明显，但它的边缘并不锋利。

线性振动电机能提供精确的反馈，位于显示屏下方的超声波指纹传感器能可靠地解锁智能手机。如果环境光线充足，使用自拍摄像头进行 2D 面部识别的效果也很好。

直立式键盘
直立式键盘
水平键盘
水平键盘

显示屏 - AMOLED 屏幕，亮度高达 3000 cd/m²

子像素
子像素

在 APL18 测试中，我们测得 Poco F7 Pro 6.67 英寸 AMOLED 屏幕的最大亮度为 3179 cd/m²，在显示 HDR 内容时，亮度可达 3187 cd/m²。我们注意到，在没有环境光传感器的情况下，最高亮度为 595 cd/m²。

在所有亮度水平下，我们测得显示屏闪烁频率为 120 Hz。与此同时，手机还使用了 PWM 调光频率，据说最高可达 3840 Hz。在测试过程中，我们测得的频率为 1041 Hz。

1816
cd/m²		1761
cd/m²		1809
cd/m²
1797
cd/m²		1801
cd/m²		1865
cd/m²
1780
cd/m²		1783
cd/m²		1844
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1865 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1806.2 cd/m² Minimum: 2.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 1801 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"		Google Pixel 9
OLED, 2424x1080, 6.3"		Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
P-OLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"		Samsung Galaxy S25
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.2"		Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"
Screen
1%
5%
-93%
-47%
Brightness middle
1801
2063
15%
1326
-26%
1301
-28%
1025
-43%
Brightness
1806
1914
6%
1312
-27%
1311
-27%
1021
-43%
Brightness Distribution
94
84
-11%
90
-4%
98
4%
98
4%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.8
0.7
12%
0.51
36%
3.1
-288%
1.2
-50%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.8
2.2
-22%
1.85
-3%
4.4
-144%
3
-67%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.3
1.2
8%
0.6
54%
2.3
-77%
2.4
-85%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.23 99%
2.191 100%
2.01 109%
2.21 100%
CCT
6620 98%
6524 100%
1355 480%
6454 101%
6656 98%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz
Amplitude: 13.7 %
Secondary Frequency: 1041 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8485 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）。

AMOLED 面板的色彩准确度非常高。在使用色彩模式和色温标准时，它与理想值的偏差最小。

色彩精度（色彩模式 Original Color Pro、色温 Warm、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩精度（色彩模式 Original Color Pro、色温 Warm、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩模式 Original Color Pro、色温 Warm、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩模式 Original Color Pro、色温 Warm、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
灰度（色彩模式为 Original Color Pro，色温为暖色，目标色彩空间为 sRGB）
灰度（色彩模式为 Original Color Pro，色温为暖色，目标色彩空间为 sRGB）
色彩饱和度（色彩模式 Original Color Pro、色温 Warm、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩饱和度（色彩模式 Original Color Pro、色温 Warm、目标色彩空间 sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.562 ms rise
↘ 0.5475 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.05 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.535 ms rise
↘ 0.5115 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.5 ms).

Poco F7 Pro 的屏幕明亮，可视角度稳定，非常适合户外使用。即使在阳光下，也能轻松阅读屏幕内容。

室外使用
室外使用
视角
视角

性能 - 搭载骁龙 8 代 3 处理器的 Poco F7 Pro

Poco F7 Pro 使用 骁龙 8 代 3，使其成为同价位中速度最快的智能手机之一。它采用了与现在价格相近的 三星Galaxy S25的 骁龙 8 精英版Galaxy才能在我们的测试中击败小米智能手机。

Geekbench 6.4 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | Geekbench AI | AI Benchmark
Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
3087 Points +49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (954 - 2329, n=25)
2116 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2071 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
2012 Points -3%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1798 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3479, n=204, last 2 years)
1543 Points -25%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1432 Points -31%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
9776 Points +60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (4564 - 7501, n=25)
6618 Points +8%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6127 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
5284 Points -14%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
5100 Points -17%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
4501 Points -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 10401, n=204, last 2 years)
4393 Points -28%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
1975467 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1390723 - 2162423, n=21)
1924216 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1879950 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
1553057 Points -17%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1536373 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=133, last 2 years)
1328327 Points -29%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1022007 Points -46%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
20623 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (12156 - 25683, n=24)
17990 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
17810 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
17200 Points -3%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
14517 Points -18%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
13948 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years)
13814 Points -22%
CrossMark - Overall
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1325 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (983 - 1474, n=17)
1253 Points -5%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1041 Points -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2674, n=162, last 2 years)
983 Points -26%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
951 Points -28%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
820 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
Points -100%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
11876 Points +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (8088 - 10966, n=20)
9839 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
9761 Points
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
8631 Points -12%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
7565 Points -22%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
6894 Points -29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 14066, n=161, last 2 years)
6764 Points -31%
System
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
17132 Points +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (8611 - 16015, n=20)
13713 Points +16%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
13391 Points +13%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
13142 Points +11%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
11850 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 20776, n=161, last 2 years)
10583 Points -11%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
7593 Points -36%
Memory
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
14759 Points +21%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
12165 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (7426 - 12716, n=20)
10692 Points -12%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
8573 Points -30%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
8397 Points -31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 20572, n=161, last 2 years)
7461 Points -39%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
6131 Points -50%
Graphics
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
33965 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (26972 - 39727, n=20)
33396 Points +4%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
32130 Points
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
27062 Points -16%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
23009 Points -28%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
20938 Points -35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=161, last 2 years)
19339 Points -40%
Web
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2275 Points +16%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1960 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1661 - 2145, n=20)
1948 Points -1%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1858 Points -5%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
1734 Points -12%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1648 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=161, last 2 years)
1604 Points -18%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
35227 Points +104%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
21837 Points +26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=153, last 2 years)
17920 Points +4%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
17304 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (11487 - 18370, n=19)
16409 Points -5%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
14466 Points -16%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
14075 Points -19%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
633 Points +57%
Average of class Smartphone
  (51 - 1501, n=39, last 2 years)
432 Points +7%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
402 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (235 - 491, n=6)
361 Points -10%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Smartphone
  (51 - 9453, n=38, last 2 years)
1027 Points +160%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
619 Points +57%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
395 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (219 - 492, n=6)
352 Points -11%
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Smartphone
  (123 - 13084, n=38, last 2 years)
1714 Points +93%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
1298 Points +47%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
886 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (483 - 1126, n=6)
799 Points -10%
AI Benchmark - Score V6
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
12223 Points +28%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
9552 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (5170 - 9552, n=4)
7010 Points -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68.9 - 12578, n=40, last 2 years)
4543 Points -52%

骁龙 8 代 3 骁龙 8 第 3 代使用 Adreno 750作为图形处理器，因此 Poco F7 Pro 在 GPU 基准测试中也取得了非常好的成绩，不过与竞争对手相比，Poco F7 Pro 在 CPU 测试中的领先优势要小一些。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6932 Points +56%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
4448 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
3332 Points -25%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
3315 Points -25%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2601 Points -42%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6854 Points +56%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
4389 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
3424 Points -22%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
3394 Points -23%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2567 Points -42%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
27327 Points +50%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
18275 Points
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
12705 Points -30%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8998 Points -51%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11765 Points +54%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
7639 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
5045 Points -34%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
4825 Points -37%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11687 Points +51%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
7716 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
4886 Points -37%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
4844 Points -37%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
1438 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
1030 Points -28%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1023 Points -29%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
986 Points -31%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
1513 Points
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1083 Points -28%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
1073 Points -29%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
992 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
6212 Points +31%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5637 Points +19%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
4739 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
24530 Points
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
23436 Points -4%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16374 Points -33%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
14501 Points +14%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
12723 Points
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11253 Points -12%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
711 fps +61%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
486 fps +10%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
441 fps
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
419 fps -5%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
380 fps -14%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps -1%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
117 fps -2%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
502 fps +97%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
270 fps +6%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
257 fps +1%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
255 fps
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
234 fps -8%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -1%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps -12%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
101 fps -16%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
268 fps +32%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
222 fps +9%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
203 fps
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
167 fps -18%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
149 fps -27%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +12%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
107 fps
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps -30%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
63 fps -41%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
61 fps -43%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
211 fps +79%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
129 fps +9%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
118 fps
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
80 fps -32%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
80 fps -32%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +30%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
92 fps
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
66 fps -28%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
56 fps -39%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
55 fps -40%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
118 fps +87%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
68 fps +8%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
63 fps
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
46 fps -27%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps -37%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
100 fps -17%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
89 fps -26%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
83 fps -31%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
279 fps +78%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
175 fps +11%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
157 fps
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
136 fps -13%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
108 fps -31%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52 fps +73%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
31 fps +3%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
30 fps
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
20 fps -33%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19 fps -37%
Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | Speedometer 3.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 (Chrome 134)
235.734 Points +6%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra (Chrome 126)
235.397 Points +6%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro (Chrome 135.0.7049.38)
221.409 Points
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro (chrome 127)
171.1 Points -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (64.1 - 241, n=23)
158.9 Points -28%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=172, last 2 years)
135.2 Points -39%
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129)
107.467 Points -51%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Samsung Galaxy S25 (Chrome 134)
435 runs/min +42%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro (Chrome 135.0.7049.38)
306 runs/min
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra (Chrome 126)
243 runs/min -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (69.6 - 311, n=18)
217 runs/min -29%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro (chrome 127)
190 runs/min -38%
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129)
185 runs/min -40%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)
164.3 runs/min -46%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 (Chrome 134)
29.9 runs/min +58%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro (Chrome 135.0.7049.38)
18.9 runs/min
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129)
14.9 runs/min -21%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra (Chrome 126)
13.6 runs/min -28%
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=92, last 2 years)
12.8 runs/min -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4.3 - 18.9, n=14)
12.6 runs/min -33%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S25 (Chrome 134)
244 Points +39%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra (Chrome 126)
185 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro (Chrome 135.0.7049.38)
176 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (69 - 212, n=19)
161.4 Points -8%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro (chrome 127)
156 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 273, n=163, last 2 years)
126 Points -28%
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129)
103 Points -41%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 (Chrome 134)
95809 Points +33%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro (Chrome 135.0.7049.38)
71769 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra (Chrome 126)
66369 Points -8%
Google Pixel 9
56737 Points -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (25953 - 72665, n=23)
52706 Points -27%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro (chrome 127)
49818 Points -31%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=212, last 2 years)
42550 Points -41%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=172, last 2 years)
1435 ms * -181%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (510 - 2066, n=21)
813 ms * -59%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro (chrome 127)
802.4 ms * -57%
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129)
744.57 ms * -46%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra (Chrome 126)
700.9 ms * -37%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro (Chrome 135.0.7049.38)
510 ms *
Samsung Galaxy S25 (Chrome 134)
389.3 ms * +24%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Poco F7 ProGoogle Pixel 9Motorola Edge 50 UltraSamsung Galaxy S25Xiaomi Poco F6 ProAverage 512 GB UFS 4.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-60%
-4%
-35%
-7%
-5%
-40%
Sequential Read 256KB
3930.33
1584.56
-60%
3926.6
0%
3982.43
1%
3070.33
-22%
4014 ?(3930 - 4110, n=3)
2%
2040 ?(269 - 4512, n=193, last 2 years)
-48%
Sequential Write 256KB
3469.2
256.48
-93%
3558.6
3%
2256.71
-35%
2987.47
-14%
3565 ?(3464 - 3761, n=3)
3%
1655 ?(103.2 - 4030, n=193, last 2 years)
-52%
Random Read 4KB
356.12
226.41
-36%
349.1
-2%
299.89
-16%
381.58
7%
327 ?(311 - 356, n=3)
-8%
283 ?(47.6 - 504, n=193, last 2 years)
-21%
Random Write 4KB
521.5
266.19
-49%
430.6
-17%
51.76
-90%
520.87
0%
438 ?(379 - 522, n=3)
-16%
327 ?(9.4 - 964, n=193, last 2 years)
-37%

排放 - 负载时发热，日常使用时冷却

温度

在 "Burnout "基准测试中，Poco F7 Pro 在最大负载下的发热温度高达 44 °C。而在日常使用过程中，其表面温度通常远低于这一温度。即使同时打开许多应用程序，小米智能手机几乎总能给人一种舒适凉爽的手感。

Max. Load
 43.4 °C43.5 °C42.4 °C 
 43.6 °C43.3 °C40.8 °C 
 42.9 °C42.7 °C41.8 °C 
Maximum: 43.6 °C
Average: 42.7 °C
40.8 °C42.7 °C43.1 °C
39.1 °C42.1 °C44 °C
37.2 °C41.2 °C42.4 °C
Maximum: 44 °C
Average: 41.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  30 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad stress test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68.5 % 0%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
68.3 %
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
65 % -5%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
54.7 % -20%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52.7 % -23%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
72.1 % +4%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71.3 % +3%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
69.5 % 0%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
69.2 %
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
47.5 % -31%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
79.4 %
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
74.4 % -6%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
70.4 % -11%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
54.1 % -32%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78.5 % +4%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
75.8 %
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
71.3 % -6%
0102030405060708090100110120130140Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø18.9 (17.1-24.7)
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø13.2 (10.9-15.3)
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø13.8 (13.2-18.3)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø25 (19.3-40.6)
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø16.7 (14.2-20.4)
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø64.1 (57.6-84.4)
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø46.2 (36.3-53.1)
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø62.3 (49.5-76.2)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø92.8 (76.2-144.6)
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø52.1 (39.9-72.9)
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø76 (70.4-105.4)
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø52.2 (45.1-55.7)
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø19.6 (18.3-23.7)
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø13.3 (11.9-15.9)
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø19 (17.7-22.3)
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø13 (11.5-16.3)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø24.2 (20.2-37.3)
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø13.8 (11.7-15.7)
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø9.14 (8.38-11.1)
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø6.79 (5.95-7.59)
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø5.76 (5.25-7.36)
小米 Poco F7 Pro
小米 Poco F7 Pro

发言人

Poco F7 Pro 配备立体声扬声器，在中高音范围内提供相当线性的声音，即使在最大音量下也不会失真。外部音频设备可通过 USB-C 和蓝牙 5.4 连接。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.238.12532.532.43121.936.14031.439.55033.540.96321.740.6802438.610017.84012516.645.216019.748.92001953.825017.557.531516.258.740016.558.650012.36663012.371.48001571.9100013.275.2125012.478160011.677.9200013.380.125001278.5315012.781.3400012.981.9500013.381.263001380.6800013.1781000013.576.31250013.670.81600013.470SPL25.490.9N0.784.9median 13.3median 75.2Delta1.710.638.437.830.632.619.236.921.533.736.939.324.442.419.744.915.844.114.146.115.254.412.454.19.5569.757.110.557.4965.49.867.48.972.19.477.711.580.511.278.31282.311.782.11280.91281.912.581.712.978.813.379.113.57613.568.613.66423.991.70.587.9median 12median 761.510.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Poco F7 ProSamsung Galaxy S25
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.4% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S25 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 6000 毫安时电池可持续使用很长时间

耗电量

Poco F7 Pro 的充电功率为 90 瓦。使用小米公司为本次测试提供的 90 瓦电源适配器，一个完整的充电周期耗时 41 分钟（测量时智能手机处于关机状态，电池电量为 0%）。32 分钟后达到 80% 的电量。

小米智能手机在功耗方面没有明显的特点。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.05 / 0.22 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.89 / 1.13 / 1.18 Watt
Load midlight 8.59 / 15.81 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
6000 mAh		Google Pixel 9
4700 mAh		Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
4500 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S25
4000 mAh		Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
5000 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-10%
8%
1%
5%
-5%
-1%
Idle Minimum *
0.89
0.66
26%
0.9
-1%
0.47
47%
0.79
11%
0.92 ?(0.4 - 1.5, n=19)
-3%
0.875 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=167, last 2 years)
2%
Idle Average *
1.13
1.49
-32%
1.2
-6%
1.04
8%
1.05
7%
1.337 ?(0.81 - 2.11, n=19)
-18%
1.441 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=167, last 2 years)
-28%
Idle Maximum *
1.18
1.78
-51%
1.4
-19%
1.07
9%
1.13
4%
1.511 ?(0.85 - 2.6, n=19)
-28%
1.584 ?(0.85 - 4.46, n=167, last 2 years)
-34%
Load Average *
8.59
7.44
13%
6.5
24%
13.33
-55%
7.88
8%
8.77 ?(3.34 - 14.7, n=18)
-2%
6.94 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=158, last 2 years)
19%
Load Maximum *
15.81
16.64
-5%
9.2
42%
16.38
-4%
16.48
-4%
11.5 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=18)
27%
10.4 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=158, last 2 years)
34%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.28 (0.97-14.5)
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.32 (0.958-9.2)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.3 (0.661-16.4)
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.818 (0.728-1.104)
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.103 (1.044-1.199)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.697 (0.648-0.956)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.2 (9.07-14.1)
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.33 (6.59-8.85)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø14.1 (9.13-16.2)
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.818 (0.728-1.104)
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.103 (1.044-1.199)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.697 (0.648-0.956)

运行时间

Poco F7 Pro 的电池容量为 6000 毫安时，明显大于同类设备，因此续航时间更长。小米手机的模拟网上冲浪时间长达近 22 小时。其最接近的竞争对手 三星Galaxy S25在 WLAN 测试中仅坚持了 18 个小时。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (135.0.7049.38)
21h 47min
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
6000 mAh
1307 min
Google Pixel 9
4700 mAh
990 min
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
4500 mAh
953 min
Samsung Galaxy S25
4000 mAh
1082 min
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
5000 mAh
909 min

Notebookcheck 总评分

在我们的测试中，小米 Poco F7 Pro 以其骁龙 8 代 3、明亮的 AMOLED 屏幕、超长的电池续航时间和更新至 2031 年等亮点证明了它是一款经济实惠的旗舰手机。尽管缺乏无线充电和 eSIM 支持等功能，但这款智能手机的性价比很高。

Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro - 04/23/2025 v8
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
88%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
53 / 69 → 77%
Weight
88%
Battery
93%
Display
93%
Games Performance
40 / 55 → 73%
Application Performance
75 / 85 → 88%
AI Performance
26%
Temperature
87%
Noise
100%
Audio
79 / 90 → 88%
Camera
72%
Average
69%
84%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
25%
Packaging
90%
Power Use
97%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
89%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 56.8%

Possible alternatives compared

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
84%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 		Amazon:
1. $8.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi Poco F7 P...
2. $5.08
Aiziki (2 Pack) Designed for...
3. $5.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi 14T Pro/P...
List Price: 650 Euro		206 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.67"
3200x1440
526 PPI
AMOLED
2.
84.9%
Google Pixel 9
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4 ⎘
ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 128 GB 		Amazon:
1. $639.99
Google Pixel 9 - Unlocked An...
2. $999.00
Google Pixel 9 Pro - Unlocke...
3. $19.03
ZAGG Glass Elite Anti-Reflec...
List Price: 899€		198 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.30"
2424x1080
421 PPI
OLED
3.
84.6%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 735 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 1024 GB 		Amazon:
1. $8.99
PORRVDP Hydrogel Film Screen...
2. $13.99
Hydrogel Film Screen Protect...
3. $5.99
HinZann Privacy Screen Prote...
List Price: 999€		197 g1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash6.70"
2712x1220
444 PPI
P-OLED
4.
88.9%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon:
1. $31.96
OtterBox Samsung Galaxy S25+...
2. $7.98
firtstnow 3 Pack Glass Scree...
3. $16.99
Super Fast Charger Type C, 2...
List Price: 899€		162 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.20"
2340x1080
416 PPI
AMOLED
5.
82.1%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 740 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 1024 GB 		List Price: 700€209 g1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash6.67"
3200x1440
526 PPI
AMOLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 这个价格几乎买不到更多的智能手机了：小米 Poco F7 Pro 评测
Manuel Masiero, 2025-04-25 (Update: 2025-04-25)