Notebookcheck Logo
Samsung Galaxy S25 review (image source: Marcus Herbrich)

三星Galaxy S25 评测--紧凑型智能手机中的明星正在陨落

已经开始罢工了?

三星的小型Galaxy S 机型一直是小型Android 手机中的佼佼者,甚至是最好的手机之一。但Galaxy S25 似乎不再能辜负这一地位。至少,看一眼它的数据表,我们就不抱什么希望了。还是Galaxy AI 让一切变得不同?
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Galaxy S Touchscreen Smartphone

三星Galaxy S25 的评价

即使到了第 15 代,这款小巧的Galaxy 手机依然保持着它的优点。这款高档手机小巧轻便,质感极佳,硬件功能强大。三星出色的更新政策和对可持续发展的重视,使其与中国竞争对手相比具有一些独特的卖点。

然而,看看 vivo X200 Pro Mini 或小米 15,就会发现在电池技术领域有多大的可能性,这也让Galaxy S25 技术上扎实的续航能力和充电速度显得有些微不足道。不过,X200 Pro Mini 在相机方面的表现也明显优于三星手机。不过,这也不足为奇,因为任何一家制造商如果四代产品的主摄像头都使用相同的传感器,简单地说就是缺乏创新。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

总体而言,Galaxy S25 与前代产品存在同样的问题。虽然它的整体包装很吸引人,但与前一年的机型相比,它的硬件几乎没有任何优势--在软件方面,老款Galaxy S 手机在升级到 One UI 7(包括改进的Galaxy AI)后,将进一步缩小差距。

Pros

+ 高品质外壳
+ 精彩展示
+ 超长更新时间
+ 强大的 SoC ...

Cons

- ...具有高度节流功能
- 蓝牙编解码器少
- 充电速度慢
- PWM 调光频率仅为 240 Hz

价格和供应情况

三星Galaxy S25 基本型号的 MRSP 为 799.99 美元,您可以直接从三星在线商店订购。.另外,该设备在亚马逊上的售价为 699.99 美元

Galaxy S25 配备 6.2 英寸 AMOLED 显示屏,是 S 系列中最小的机型。 Galaxy S 系列.与其 相比相比,S25 在硬件方面没有太大变化,最大的升级是采用了新的 骁龙8精英版Galaxy.高通芯片组是专门为三星量身定制的,与标准版相比,它在Galaxy AI 和 ProVisual Engine 的本地加速方面具有优势。 标准版SoC 的优势。

在没有太多硬件创新的情况下,三星倒是把Galaxy S25 的重点放在了新的 AI 功能上。在这篇评测中,我们将看看Galaxy AI 在哪些方面有所改进,以及Galaxy S24 的继任者进行了哪些细微调整。

三星Galaxy S25 的规格

Samsung Galaxy S25 (Galaxy S25 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy 8 x 3.5 - 4.5 GHz, Oryon Gen 2
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 830, Core: 1200 MHz
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
6.20 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 416 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB 
, 219 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-Type-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, Miracast, OTG
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B25/​B26/​B28/​B32/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B66), 5G (n1/​n2/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n12/​n20/​n25/​n26/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n66/​n75/​n77/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.2 x 146.9 x 70.5
Battery
4000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, 24 mm, OIS) + 10 MPix (3x optical zoom, f/2.4, 67 mm) + 12 MPix (f/2.2, 13 mm, wide angle lens), camera2 API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (f/2.2, 26 mm, AF)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: OnScreen, USB cable, info material, SIM tool, One UI 7.0, 24 Months Warranty, IP68/69, SAR value: 1.294W/​kg - Head, 1.363W/​kg - Body Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, LDAC, SSC | GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1, B1C, B2a), Galileo (E1, E5a), QZSS (L1, L5) | HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+ | DRM Widevine L1, fanless, waterproof
Weight
162 g
Price
899 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳 -Galaxy S25 防水

三星坚持其久经考验的设计,与Galaxy S25 相比,仅对其外观做了极小的改动。 前代.不过,由于 6.2 英寸 OLED 面板周围的边框更薄,这款手机略显紧凑。这也反映在其 91.1% 的屏占比上,对于一款小型智能手机来说,屏占比略微提高,效果非常不错。另一方面,几乎没有人会注意到它的重量略微减轻了约 6 克。

三星Galaxy S25 智能手机评测(图片来源:Daniel Schmidt)
三星Galaxy S25 智能手机评测(图片来源:Daniel Schmidt)

Galaxy S25 的标准颜色对比(图片来源:Daniel Schmidt)

Galaxy S25 采用康宁大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2 保护,而大猩猩装甲或当前版本的 Amor 2 又是专为 超级型号.Armor 铝边框和机身背面均采用哑光处理。小 S 机型今年再次提供四种标准颜色。此外,还有三种独家配色,只能从三星公司直接购买。

对于它的制造质量,我们没有什么可批评的--外壳给人一种非常优质的感觉。得益于 IP68 认证,这款三星手机具有防水功能,因此您可以在水中对其进行清洁。

三星Galaxy S25 评测
三星Galaxy S25 评测
三星Galaxy S25 评测
三星Galaxy S25 评测
三星Galaxy S25 评测

尺寸比较

152.8 mm 72 mm 8.5 mm 199 g152.3 mm 71.2 mm 8.08 mm 191 g150.8 mm 71.8 mm 8.2 mm 187 g147 mm 70.6 mm 7.6 mm 167 g146.9 mm 70.5 mm 7.2 mm 162 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性 - 可输出图像的三星智能手机

Galaxy S25 有三个存储版本,即 128、256 或 512 GB。入门级小机型仍然只支持较慢的 UFS 3.1 标准,而顶级机型则使用 UFS 4.0。虽然在我们看来,128 GB 的容量在这个价位的机型中似乎已经跟不上时代了,但三星至少将所有版本的内存都增加到了 12 GB。

除了蓝牙 5.4、Samsung Dex、NFC 和 Miracast 之外,Galaxy S25 还配备了快速 USB 3.2 端口(Gen 1),支持 USB OTG 和有线图像输出。在我们使用连接的 M2.SSD 硬盘进行复制测试时,USB 端口的传输速度达到了 190 MB/s。不过,我们有点惊讶地发现,S24 的继任者 Galaxy S24的继任者降低了输出电压。这就是为什么我们无法在测试中使用三星 980 Pro,而只能依靠更省钱的三星 PSSD T7。

exFAT 文件系统对三星智能手机没有任何问题,但 NTFS 格式的数据载体只能读取,不能写入。

机壳右侧(按钮:音量、开关)
机壳右侧(按钮:音量、开关)
箱体左侧
箱体左侧
顶盖侧面(麦克风)
顶盖侧面(麦克风)
机箱底部侧面(扬声器、USB 端口、麦克风、卡槽)
机箱底部侧面(扬声器、USB 端口、麦克风、卡槽)

软件 - 支持长期更新的Galaxy 手机

Galaxy S25 预装了Android 15 和最新版本的 One UI。Galaxy S 系列的优势之一是支持长期更新,S25 也不例外。这款顶级手机将在整整七年(直到 2032 年 1 月 31 日)内接受更新。在最初的几年里,安全补丁将每月推出一次。在我们的测试中,该设备的最新安全补丁是从 2025 年 3 月 1 日开始的。

据说,随着 One UI 7.0 版本的发布,三星改进了其内部Galaxy AI。得益于新的 "AI 代理",Galaxy S25 可以解释文本、语音、图像和视频,这应该会让与数字助理的交互感觉更自然。此外,谷歌的 "Circle to Search "也得到了改进,新的 "Now Bar "可在手机锁屏上提供个性化信息,而 "AI Select "则旨在预测用户的需求。

三星Galaxy S25 智能手机评测
三星Galaxy S25 智能手机评测
三星Galaxy S25 智能手机评测
三星Galaxy S25 智能手机评测

可持续性

三星在其产品环境报告中提供了Galaxy S25 的详细环境数据。报告显示,这款顶级手机使用了多种可回收原材料,如金、铜和铝。其塑料和大猩猩玻璃也有一部分是用回收材料制成的。

为了更好地评估其产品对环境的影响,制造商规定了每款机型整个生命周期的碳足迹,包括采购、生产、分销和产品使用。在这种情况下,Galaxy S25 的二氧化碳当量值为 45.7 千克。

此外,三星Galaxy S25 的包装是可持续的,不使用任何塑料。由于备件、自修工具包和维修说明一应俱全,因此在一定程度上可以自行维修设备。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 -Galaxy S25 当然配备 5G 功能

Galaxy S25 支持所有移动通信标准的各种频率,包括 5G Sub6 和现代 WiFi 7。不过,它与我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 的传输速率在 6 GHz WLAN 范围内仍有很大的提升空间。我们在传输过程中测得的数据传输速率也不完全稳定。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy S25
Wi-Fi 7
1058 (518min - 1295max) MBit/s
Average Wi-Fi 7
  (556 - 1806, n=59)
1015 MBit/s -4%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
955 (858min - 990max) MBit/s -10%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Wi-Fi 6E
913 (688min - 994max) MBit/s -14%
Xiaomi 15
Wi-Fi 7
876 (445min - 968max) MBit/s -17%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Wi-Fi 7
748 (603min, 622.14P1 - 825max) MBit/s -29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (49.8 - 1806, n=190, last 2 years)
724 MBit/s -32%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Wi-Fi 7
1698 (1563min, 1566.48P1 - 1809max) MBit/s +46%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Wi-Fi 7
1167 (1006min - 1197max) MBit/s
Average Wi-Fi 7
  (565 - 1875, n=59)
1014 MBit/s -13%
Xiaomi 15
Wi-Fi 7
871 (785min - 951max) MBit/s -25%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
795 (680min - 916max) MBit/s -32%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Wi-Fi 6E
774 (699min - 820max) MBit/s -34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52 - 1857, n=188, last 2 years)
709 MBit/s -39%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
1830 (1666min - 1889max) MBit/s +51%
Average Wi-Fi 7
  (563 - 1945, n=45)
1536 MBit/s +27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (521 - 1945, n=82, last 2 years)
1436 MBit/s +19%
Xiaomi 15
Wi-Fi 7
1386 (628min - 1900max) MBit/s +15%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Wi-Fi 7
1210 (998min - 1383max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Xiaomi 15
Wi-Fi 7
1793 (1671min - 1841max) MBit/s +49%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
1602 (1387min - 1829max) MBit/s +33%
Average Wi-Fi 7
  (451 - 1864, n=45)
1510 MBit/s +26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (451 - 1864, n=82, last 2 years)
1367 MBit/s +14%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Wi-Fi 7
1201 (1184min - 1221max) MBit/s
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S25 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1210 (998-1383)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1200 (1184-1221)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1042 (518-1295)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø913 (688-994)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1165 (1006-1197)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø772 (699-820)
室内定位服务
室内定位服务
户外定位服务
户外定位服务

三星智能手机支持双频全球导航卫星系统,包括所有全球卫星网络,因此能够快速准确地定位。为了检验其定位精度,我们在一次短途步行中将其与 Garmin Venu 2 进行了比较。

Galaxy S25 的定位结果非常好,在某些情况下比 Garmin 智能手表还要准确。这种高定位精度使Galaxy 手机成为重视精确导航的用户的绝佳伴侣。

Galaxy S25 与 Garmin Venu 2
Galaxy S25 与 Garmin Venu 2

电话功能和通话质量 - 支持双 eSIM 卡的三星智能手机

三星Galaxy S25 智能手机评测
三星Galaxy S25 智能手机评测

Galaxy S25 支持双 SIM 卡,用户可以选择使用两张 nano SIM 卡、两张 eSIM 卡或两者结合使用。此外,还支持 VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话等通话功能以及人工智能支持的实时翻译。

这款小巧的Galaxy 手机的通话质量非常好,这意味着通话者可以清晰地听懂通话内容,语音传输自然。背景噪音被可靠地过滤掉了。

相机 - 未升级传感器的Galaxy S25

自拍Galaxy S25
自拍Galaxy S25

"(S24) "的 Galaxy S24Galaxy S23采用与 2025 型号几乎相同的摄像头。前置镜头具有自动对焦功能,分辨率为 1200 万像素,可拍摄出漂亮的自拍照,日光下的清晰度也不错。

Galaxy S25 的主摄像头再次配备了 ISOCELL GN3。1/1.57 英寸摄像头传感器自 Galaxy S22提供光学防抖功能,并可在专业模式下使用 5000 万像素的全分辨率。我们不清楚为什么三星没有再次选择更为现代的ISOCELL GNK。.

0.6x
0.6x
1x
1x
2x
2x
3x
3x
6x
6x
10x
10x
30 倍(最大值)
30 倍(最大值)

使用 5000 万像素摄像头拍摄的照片动态范围大,色彩自然,但边缘显得有些模糊。在弱光环境下,由于传感器较小,照片的轮廓要比白天柔和得多,但对于一款小巧的智能手机来说,光线还是很充足的。A vivo X200 Pro mini配备的索尼 LYT-818(1/1.28 英寸)的照片质量要好得多。

该设备的超广角镜头以及带 OIS 和三倍无损放大功能的长焦镜头与 Galaxy S24.Galaxy S25 的照片清晰度尚可,但在光线不足的条件下很快就会出现噪点。

视频录制最高可达 8K,每秒 30 格。在 UHD 画质下,您可以选择最高 60 帧/秒。由于相机的 OIS 功能良好,视频录制时的防抖效果也不错。

三星Galaxy S25 智能手机评测
三星Galaxy S25 智能手机评测
三星Galaxy S25 智能手机评测
三星Galaxy S25 智能手机评测
三星Galaxy S25 智能手机评测

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide angleWide angleLow lightUltra-wide angle5x zoom
orginal image
click to load images

在可控的照明条件下,Galaxy S25 的色彩还原能力在智能手机中相当不错。在我们的测量中,色彩看起来比参考值稍亮,但手机的 DeltaE 偏差总体上仍处于较低水平。

ColorChecker
2 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
3 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
1.6 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
1 ∆E
1.1 ∆E
3 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S25: 3.39 ∆E min: 1.05 - max: 8.05 ∆E
ColorChecker
12.7 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
18 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
10 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
20.8 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S25: 14.12 ∆E min: 5.8 - max: 20.81 ∆E

配件和保修 - Samsung 手机不带电源供应器

Galaxy S25 配有 Torras 生产的表壳
Galaxy S25 配有 Torras 生产的表壳

Galaxy S25 仅随附 USB-C 数据线和 SIM 卡工具。开箱后没有直接安装屏幕保护膜。可在制造商的网上商店选购配套的三星电源适配器和其他配件。Torras 等第三方供应商也为Galaxy S 小手机销售保护套,亚马逊上有售。

在美国,Galaxy S25 享有 12 个月的标准保修期,可通过制造商自己的 Care+ 保险套餐延长保修期。根据保险期限和保险范围的不同,价格在 8 美元到 349 美元之间。

输入设备和操作 - 三星Galaxy S25 配备 FaceUnlock(面部解锁)功能。

手机 6.2 英寸 OLED 显示屏上的输入操作非常准确。由于设计紧凑,按键的位置符合人体工程学,指纹传感器的位置也很高,非常方便。Galaxy S25 采用超声波技术,解锁速度非常快。即使手是湿的,OLED 面板上的传感器也能可靠地工作。使用前置摄像头进行二维面部识别的可靠性要低得多。

电源按钮不仅是经典的开关按钮,还可以为其分配功能。开箱后,Galaxy S25 只要长按控制元件就能启动双子座语音助手。轻按按钮两次可打开相机或用户可自由指定的应用程序。内置线性振动电机可提供清晰的触觉反馈,并可在设备设置中进行完全自定义。

显示屏 - 采用 AMOLED 技术的三星手机

OLED 显示屏基于 RG/BG 子像素矩阵,每个子像素由一个红色、一个蓝色和一个绿色发光二极管组成。
OLED 显示屏基于 RG/BG 子像素矩阵,每个子像素由一个红色、一个蓝色和一个绿色发光二极管组成。

Galaxy S25 采用 6.2 英寸 Dynamic AMOLED 2X 显示屏,利用 LTPO 技术可将帧速率从 1 Hz 动态调节到 120 Hz。尽管 1080p 分辨率仅为 416 ppi,但屏幕看起来非常清晰。面板本身可能与 Galaxy S24-至少我们的测量结果是这样的。

OLED 显示屏的光输出与前代产品几乎相同。在显示全白时,其亮度 "仅 "为 1,311 cd/m²,而我们在 APL18 样品上测得的亮度则高达 2,594 cd/m²。在播放 4K HDR 模式视频时,亮度甚至达到了 2,766 cd/m²。

1328
cd/m²
1304
cd/m²
1318
cd/m²
1326
cd/m²
1301
cd/m²
1298
cd/m²
1324
cd/m²
1301
cd/m²
1297
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1328 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1310.8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 1301 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.88
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
97.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.01
Samsung Galaxy S25
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.2"
Samsung Galaxy S24
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2340x1080, 6.2"
Google Pixel 9 Pro
OLED, 2856x1280, 6.3"
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
AMOLED, 2640x1216, 6.3"
Xiaomi 15
OLED, 2670x1200, 6.4"
Screen
-3%
47%
43%
9%
Brightness middle
1301
1349
4%
2083
60%
1764
36%
1021
-22%
Brightness
1311
1369
4%
2016
54%
1817
39%
1018
-22%
Brightness Distribution
98
97
-1%
84
-14%
95
-3%
98
0%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.1
3.3
-6%
0.7
77%
0.84
73%
1.3
58%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.4
5
-14%
2
55%
1.53
65%
2.9
34%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.3
2.4
-4%
1.1
52%
1.2
48%
2.2
4%
Gamma
2.01 109%
1.97 112%
2.22 99%
2.239 98%
2.25 98%
CCT
6454 101%
6635 98%
6560 99%
6646 98%
6658 98%

* ... smaller is better

由于采用了 OLED 技术,三星使用 PWM 调制来控制手机的显示亮度。Galaxy S25 的屏幕以 240 Hz 的频率不断闪烁,频率并不高。三星并没有使用高频 PWM 调光技术,因此很遗憾,它的屏幕亮度没有任何变化。 前代机型.

使用示波器测量时,即使振幅相对平缓,对 PWM 比较敏感的人仍可能会感到不适。

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240 Hz
Amplitude: 13.54 %

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8529 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平,但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图)。

即使在第 7 版中,三星 One UI 也只有两种色彩配置文件。如果你想获得最准确的色彩和灰度显示效果,那就只能选择 "自然 "色彩模式,它不允许用户对色温等进行任何调整。三星急需在这方面做出改进。

我们使用卡尔曼分析软件和照片光谱仪检查了 AMOLED 面板的色彩还原能力。Galaxy S25 的整体偏差不大,但竞争对手的色彩和灰度更为准确。

色彩准确度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩准确度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩饱和度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩饱和度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.62 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.8925 ms rise
↘ 0.729 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.64 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.538 ms rise
↘ 1.103 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.6 ms).

Galaxy S25 非常适合户外使用;即使在阳光直射下,内容也始终清晰可见。不过,如果不使用环境光线传感器,亮度就会降低(414 cd/m²)。在我们的测试中,"额外亮度 "选项(740 cd/m²)只能提供有限的帮助。在手机的视角稳定性方面,我们没有什么可抱怨的。

性能 -Galaxy S25 动力强劲

与去年与去年不同的是 Ultra 型号使用高通芯片,还使用了更小的Galaxy S25。该 Galaxy 版骁龙 8 精英版的 CPU 和 GPU 性能比前代产品提高了 40%。

在运行我们选择的基准测试时,也可以观察到 CPU 性能的提升。在 Geekbench 6 中,我们注意到其单核和多核性能均提高了约 34%。对于人工智能基准测试尤为重要的 NPU 单元,Galaxy S25 有时在性能上实现了更大的飞跃。不过,将内存增加到 12GB LPDDR5x 也应该起到了积极作用。

Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
  (3087 - 3200, n=3)
3141 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
3087 Points
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
3001 Points -3%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
2589 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
2045 Points -34%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1971 Points -36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3479, n=195, last 2 years)
1530 Points -50%
Multi-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
  (9776 - 10029, n=3)
9942 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
9776 Points
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
9202 Points -6%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
8078 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
6456 Points -34%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
4820 Points -51%
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 10401, n=195, last 2 years)
4359 Points -55%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2173 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
  (1955 - 2227, n=3)
2132 Points +9%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
2084 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
1955 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1553 Points -21%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1372 Points -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (139 - 2437, n=169, last 2 years)
1085 Points -45%
Multi-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
  (7823 - 8203, n=3)
8022 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
7823 Points
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
7733 Points -1%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
7398 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
5561 Points -29%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
3787 Points -52%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 8816, n=169, last 2 years)
3653 Points -53%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2677100 Points +36%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
2429503 Points +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
  (1975467 - 2271821, n=3)
2169785 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
1975467 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1616403 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=128, last 2 years)
1325221 Points -33%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1139380 Points -42%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
  (20623 - 20764, n=3)
20687 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
20623 Points
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
19192 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
17763 Points -14%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
16216 Points -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 27169, n=195, last 2 years)
13737 Points -33%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
11823 Points -43%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
  (11876 - 13325, n=3)
12808 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
11876 Points
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
11031 Points -7%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
10948 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
9287 Points -22%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
7716 Points -35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 13729, n=160, last 2 years)
6669 Points -44%
System
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
  (17132 - 17481, n=3)
17261 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
17132 Points
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
16439 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
14406 Points -16%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
14303 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 19891, n=160, last 2 years)
10483 Points -39%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
8029 Points -53%
Memory
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
16961 Points +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
  (14759 - 17355, n=3)
16126 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
14759 Points
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
10197 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
10193 Points -31%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
9463 Points -36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 18911, n=160, last 2 years)
7299 Points -51%
Graphics
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
52738 Points +55%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
44189 Points +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
  (33965 - 45691, n=3)
41739 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
33965 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
26783 Points -21%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
23041 Points -32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=160, last 2 years)
18965 Points -44%
Web
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
  (2275 - 2353, n=3)
2317 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2275 Points
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
2009 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1908 Points -16%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1879 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=160, last 2 years)
1598 Points -30%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
1202 Points -47%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
78695 Points +260%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
36578 Points +68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
  (21837 - 23281, n=3)
22753 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
21837 Points
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
18154 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=152, last 2 years)
17950 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
11574 Points -47%
AImark - Score v3.x
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
52274 Points +2661%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=143, last 2 years)
26722 Points +1312%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
  (1891 - 1923, n=3)
1902 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
1893 Points
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
1790 Points -5%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1146 Points -39%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1134 Points -40%
Geekbench AI
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
12898 Points +894%
Average of class Smartphone
  (123 - 13084, n=35, last 2 years)
1776 Points +37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
  (1298 - 1567, n=3)
1432 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
1298 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1096 Points -16%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
1080 Points -17%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
9184 Points +1384%
Average of class Smartphone
  (51 - 9453, n=35, last 2 years)
1077 Points +74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
  (619 - 697, n=3)
659 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
619 Points
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
491 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
324 Points -48%
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
1433 Points +126%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
  (633 - 700, n=3)
668 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
633 Points
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
500 Points -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (51 - 1501, n=35, last 2 years)
436 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
283 Points -55%
AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Smartphone
  (46.4 - 3219, n=36, last 2 years)
930 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
  (240 - 245, n=2)
243 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
182 Points
Score V6
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
12223 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
  (10534 - 12223, n=3)
11126 Points -9%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
10783 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68.9 - 12223, n=36, last 2 years)
4388 Points -64%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1112 Points -91%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
991 Points -92%

该设备配备 Adreno 830图形处理器,该处理器在Galaxy S25 中的最高时钟频率(1.2 GHz)略高。因此,在我们的 GPU 测试中,Galaxy S25 的性能往往略高于小米 15。 小米 15在我们的 GPU 测试中, S25 经常略微领先于配备高通标准版 GPU 的小米 15。不过,可能由于发热和明显的节流现象,单个数值较弱。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6932 Points
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6076 Points -12%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5845 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3933 Points -43%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2605 Points -62%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6854 Points
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5995 Points -13%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5923 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3902 Points -43%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2547 Points -63%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
27327 Points
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24960 Points -9%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
22342 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12652 Points -54%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9476 Points -65%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11765 Points
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
10764 Points -9%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
10278 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6649 Points -43%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11687 Points
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11649 Points 0%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
10432 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6673 Points -43%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2298 Points
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2258 Points
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1026 Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2365 Points
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2362 Points
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1001 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps -1%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
718 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
711 fps
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
628 fps -12%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
415 fps -42%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
403 fps -43%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps -1%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
502 fps
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
451 fps -10%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
423 fps -16%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
289 fps -42%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
245 fps -51%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
104 fps -13%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
308 fps +15%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
307 fps +15%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
268 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
214 fps -20%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
165 fps -38%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps -12%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps -55%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
211 fps
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
192 fps -9%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
157 fps -26%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
131 fps -38%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
85 fps -60%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
115 fps -4%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
109 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps -12%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
47 fps -61%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
118 fps
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
100 fps -15%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 fps -42%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 fps -42%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps -63%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
118 fps -2%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77 fps -36%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
279 fps
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
274 fps -2%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
258 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
153 fps -45%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -57%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52 fps
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
47 fps -10%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
46 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
32 fps -38%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps -62%

三星手机的浏览器速度极快。网站加载迅速,滚动浏览流畅。此外,Galaxy S25 在基准测试中一直保持良好的成绩。

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (236 - 334, n=3)
295 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy S25 (Chrome 134)
235.734 Points
Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)
191.986 Points -19%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini (Chrome 133)
167.122 Points -29%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=171, last 2 years)
132 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
128.638 Points -45%
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
108.429 Points -54%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Samsung Galaxy S25 (Chrome 134)
435 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (425 - 446, n=3)
435 runs/min 0%
Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)
342 runs/min -21%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
267 runs/min -39%
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
207 runs/min -52%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=151, last 2 years)
158.9 runs/min -63%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 (Chrome 134)
29.9 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (29 - 29.9, n=3)
29.4 runs/min -2%
Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)
23.5 runs/min -21%
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
15.8 runs/min -47%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini (Chrome 133)
15 runs/min -50%
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=87, last 2 years)
12.6 runs/min -58%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S25 (Chrome 134)
244 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (236 - 244, n=3)
240 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
176 Points -28%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini (Chrome 133)
176 Points -28%
Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)
168 Points -31%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=161, last 2 years)
124.1 Points -49%
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
106 Points -57%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (95809 - 99202, n=3)
97943 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S25 (Chrome 134)
95809 Points
Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)
78653 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
63748 Points -33%
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
60566 Points -37%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini (Chrome 133)
56843 Points -41%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=209, last 2 years)
41397 Points -57%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=170, last 2 years)
1451 ms * -273%
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
699 ms * -80%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
662.3 ms * -70%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini (Chrome 133)
660.34 ms * -70%
Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)
454.4 ms * -17%
Samsung Galaxy S25 (Chrome 134)
389.3 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (377 - 389, n=3)
385 ms * +1%

* ... smaller is better

256 GB 版本的 UFS 4.0 存储速度极快,但在写入较小的数据块时,其速度值明显较弱。

Samsung Galaxy S25Samsung Galaxy S24Google Pixel 9 ProVivo X200 Pro MiniXiaomi 15Average 256 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
55%
58%
244%
167%
183%
111%
Sequential Read 256KB
3982.43
3701.23
-7%
1717.9
-57%
3804.53
-4%
3934.92
-1%
Sequential Write 256KB
2256.71
1435.39
-36%
253.53
-89%
3384.34
50%
3889.06
72%
Random Read 4KB
299.89
373.12
24%
218.41
-27%
302.11
1%
296.95
-1%
Random Write 4KB
51.76
175.98
240%
261.55
405%
532.65
929%
360.36
596%

游戏 - 三星智能手机可实现 120fps 的速度

得益于其强大的 Adreno 830 GPUGalaxy S25 可以保证高细节和稳定的帧率。使用GameBench 时,即使在玩《源氏冲击》等要求较高的游戏时,我们也没有发现任何掉帧现象。,在运行系统要求较低或细节较少的游戏时,HFR 游戏帧数最高可达 120fps。

源泉冲击
源泉冲击
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S25; Genshin Impact: Ø60 (59-61)
Samsung Galaxy S25; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø119.6 (114-121)
Samsung Galaxy S25; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.8 (56-61)
Samsung Galaxy S25; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø40 (38-41)

排放 -Galaxy S25 保持凉爽

温度

在我们的测试中,Galaxy S25 的表面温度保持在较低水平,在负载情况下约为 43 °C,这对于一款紧凑型智能手机来说是特别低的。但遗憾的是,在 3DMark 压力测试中,Galaxy 手机的最高性能下降了约 50%。小米的小型 高端手机.

Max. Load
 41.7 °C40.6 °C36.9 °C 
 41.5 °C38.9 °C37.8 °C 
 41.3 °C39.9 °C36 °C 
Maximum: 41.7 °C
Average: 39.4 °C
36.1 °C39.7 °C43.1 °C
36.4 °C40.7 °C43.3 °C
33.9 °C39.5 °C41.7 °C
Maximum: 43.3 °C
Average: 39.4 °C
Room Temperature 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.7 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.3 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad stress test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
75.5 % +43%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67.6 % +28%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66.3 % +26%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52.7 %
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
45 % -15%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69.3 % +46%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68.7 % +45%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
57 % +20%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
48.4 % +2%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
47.5 %
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66.9 % +24%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60.7 % +12%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
57.9 % +7%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
54.1 %
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77.3 %
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69.5 %
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
61.2 %
0102030405060708090100110120130140Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø25 (19.3-40.6)
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø29 (26.2-38.2)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø92.8 (76.2-144.6)
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø101.2 (87.7-132.2)
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø117.4 (98.5-139.4)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø24.2 (20.2-37.3)
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø27.8 (24.8-37.1)
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø13.8 (12.2-17.6)

发言人

Galaxy S25 采用双扬声器系统,低音细腻,高音清晰,但三星手机并不能处理非常低的频率。我们的粉红噪声测量结果显示,中频的频率曲线不断上升,而超高音则略有下降。不过,总体而言,对于一款紧凑型智能手机来说,它的音质还是非常不错的。

在蓝牙音频编解码器支持方面,三星就没有那么慷慨了。尽管如此,它还是提供了 Auracast 广播选项。此外,还可以通过 USB-C 端口输出音乐。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.437.82530.632.63119.236.94021.533.75036.939.36324.442.48019.744.910015.844.112514.146.116015.254.420012.454.12509.5563159.757.140010.557.4500965.46309.867.48008.972.110009.477.7125011.580.5160011.278.320001282.3250011.782.131501280.940001281.9500012.581.7630012.978.8800013.379.11000013.5761250013.568.61600013.664SPL23.991.7N0.587.9median 12median 76Delta1.510.736.236.430.733.325.636.826.733.336.735.824.636.417.639.218.739.818.244.515.956.117.35615.260.414.161.913.462.113.86714.365.413.770.612.476.112.777.712.175.212.978.512.579.312.282.712.882.713.181.313.582.613.17913.775.91472.513.36925.291.40.786.8median 13.5median 75.21.28.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy S25Samsung Galaxy S24
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy S25 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S24 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 配备快速无线充电 2.0 的三星智能手机

耗电量

说到手机的电池及其容量,三星公司似乎是在敷衍了事。充电速度也是如此。Galaxy S25 的电池容量仍为 4,000 毫安时,有线充电仅支持 25 瓦特。三星手机的无线充电最大功率为 15 瓦。在我们使用 小米 25000.

小米 25000 在闲置模式下的平均耗电量约为 1 瓦,与竞争对手不相上下。 高通 SoC在负载情况下的功耗明显高于 小米 15.这一点在 Geekbench 和 GFXBench 的功耗测试中也很明显。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.14 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.47 / 1.04 / 1.07 Watt
Load midlight 13.33 / 16.38 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy S25
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S24
4000 mAh
Google Pixel 9 Pro
4700 mAh
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
5700 mAh
Xiaomi 15
5400 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
1%
-4%
-30%
11%
0%
-17%
Idle Minimum *
0.47
0.42
11%
0.59
-26%
0.6
-28%
0.5
-6%
Idle Average *
1.04
0.93
11%
1.1
-6%
1.6
-54%
1.11
-7%
Idle Maximum *
1.07
1.07
-0%
1.2
-12%
2.5
-134%
1.13
-6%
Load Average *
13.33
15.43
-16%
7.15
46%
8.9
33%
8.91
33%
Load Maximum *
16.38
16.51
-1%
20.37
-24%
11.2
32%
9.3
43%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.3 (0.661-16.4)
Xiaomi 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5 (0.695-9.3)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.697 (0.648-0.956)
Xiaomi 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.681 (0.615-1.184)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø14.1 (9.13-16.2)
Xiaomi 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.27 (9.11-9.3)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.697 (0.648-0.956)
Xiaomi 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.681 (0.615-1.184)

运行时间

Galaxy S25 稍微偏紧的能量存储有助于实现良好的电池续航时间,但看看来自中国的竞争对手,就会发现在紧凑型智能手机中续航时间的可能性有多大。由于Galaxy 手机在 "Burnout "基准测试中过热,我们在简化条件下进行了负载测试(仅 CPU)。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
45h 12min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 135)
18h 02min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
26h 30min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 02min
Samsung Galaxy S25
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S24
4000 mAh
Google Pixel 9 Pro
4700 mAh
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
5700 mAh
Xiaomi 15
5400 mAh
Battery Runtime
-17%
-6%
21%
39%
Reader / Idle
2712
2398
-12%
3211
18%
3759
39%
H.264
1590
1227
-23%
2098
32%
1784
12%
WiFi v1.3
1082
880
-19%
1017
-6%
1153
7%
1367
26%
Load
182
159
-13%
227
25%
326
79%

Notebookcheck 总评分

三星Galaxy S25 是一款出色的智能手机,但来自中国的紧凑型手机竞争正日益加剧,昔日的同类产品领头羊正逐渐被中国市场所取代。

Samsung Galaxy S25 - 03/28/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
93%
Keyboard
66 / 75 → 88%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
68 / 69 → 99%
Weight
93%
Battery
91%
Display
90%
Games Performance
38 / 55 → 69%
Application Performance
84 / 85 → 99%
AI Performance
40%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
79 / 90 → 88%
Camera
83%
Average
82%
89%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
90.7%
Materials
70%
Packaging
95%
Power Use
98.3%
Repairability
80%
Software Updates
100%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 89%

Possible alternatives compared

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
88.9%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $8.99
firtstnow 3 Pack Glass Scree...
2. $16.99
Super Fast Charger Type C, 2...
3. $33.99
Wireless Charger for Samsung...
List Price: 899€
162 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.20"
2340x1080
416 PPI
AMOLED
2.
90% v7 (old)
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400 ⎘
Samsung Xclipse 940 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon: $780.07
List Price: 899€
167 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.20"
2340x1080
416 PPI
Dynamic AMOLED 2X
3.
85.7%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4 ⎘
ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 128 GB 
Amazon:
1. $949.00
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL - Unlo...
2. $778.75
Google Pixel 9 - Unlocked An...
3. $11.99
OMOTON 3+2 Pack for Google P...
199 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.30"
2856x1280
495 PPI
OLED
4.
87.2%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400 ⎘
ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $4.43
AKABEILA [2 Pack Privacy Scr...
2. $12.99
Vaxson 3-Pack Anti Blue Ligh...
3. $12.99
Vaxson 2-Pack Film Protector...
List Price: 700€
187 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.31"
2640x1216
461 PPI
AMOLED
5.
88.4%
Xiaomi 15
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $18.95
for Xiaomi Charger 120W Hype...
2. $8.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi 15 Ultra ...
3. $8.99
Fhyeugfy for Xiaomi 15 Ultra...
List Price: 760€
191 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.36"
2670x1200
460 PPI
OLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 三星Galaxy S25 评测--紧凑型智能手机中的明星正在陨落
Marcus Herbrich, 2025-03-29 (Update: 2025-03-29)