小米Poco M5智能手机评测--价格低廉的手机，却蕴含着巨大的能量

Name: Xiaomi Poco M5
Brand: Xiaomi

预算大户。

小米Poco M5试图凭借强大的处理器在200欧元以下的价格范围内脱颖而出。然而，相机并不那么出色，而且这款手机在定位追踪方面也有问题。那么小米Poco M5是否只是人群中的另一款预算手机？

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 11/30/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone

市场上有相当多的经济型小米手机，它们中的大多数都为其价格提供了巨大的规格。Poco M5的价格约为200欧元（210美元），具有相当快的处理器，具有90Hz刷新率的全高清显示屏，以及大电池。

也就是说，即使是小米也不能创造奇迹，无法在这么低的价位为消费者提供具有5G功能的手机。在这篇评论中，我们将仔细看看这款手机是否延续了小米提供高性价比的传统。

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Poco M5 (Poco M Series)

Processor

Mediatek Helio G99 8 x 2 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G57 MP2

Memory

4 GB

Display

6.58 inch 20:9, 2408 x 1080 pixel 401 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, Gorilla Glass, glossy: yes, 90 Hz

Storage

128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB

, 108 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: 3.5mm, Card Reader: microSD (dedicated, up to 1TB) , 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Sensors: accelerometer, proximity, compass

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.9 x 164 x 76.1

Battery

5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 18 watt charging

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 12

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/1.8, phase detection AF, LED flash, videos @1080p/30fps (camera 1); 2.0MP, f/2.4, macro lens (camera 2); 2.0MP, f/2.4, depth of field (camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.2, videos @1080p/30fps

Additional features

Speakers: mono speaker, charger, USB cable, SIM tool, silicone bumper, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.520W/kg Head, 0.832W/kg Body , fanless

Weight

201 g

Price

210 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
78.9 % v7 ^(old)	11 / 2022	Xiaomi Poco M5 Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2	201 g	128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.58"	2408x1080
77.3 % v7 ^(old)	11 / 2022	Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2	195 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.60"	2408x1080
74.4 % v7 ^(old)	11 / 2022	Xiaomi Poco C40 JR510, Mali-G52 MP1	204 g	32 GB eMMC Flash	6.71"	1650x720
76 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2022	Realme Narzo 50A Prime T7225 (T612), Mali-G52 MP1	192.5 g	64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.60"	2408x1080
75.1 % v7 ^(old)	05 / 2022	Motorola Moto G22 Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320	185 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.50"	1600x720

外壳 - 耐指纹的人造革

我们喜欢手机机身上的人造革设计。它可以防止指纹，而且触摸起来很舒服。相机模块延伸到机箱的整个宽度，意味着手机平放在桌子上时不会晃动。

在颜色选择方面，小米很大胆。除了更低调的绿色和黑色（正如你所期望的），Poco M5还有黄色。这款手机有很好的装配和加工，就其价格而言，感觉非常结实。小米声称显示屏受到大猩猩玻璃的保护，但没有说明手机上使用的是哪个版本。

尺寸比较

Xiaomi Poco C40 Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Xiaomi Poco M5 Realme Narzo 50A Prime Motorola Moto G22 DIN A6 ❌

规格 - 包括NFC

在中欧，Poco M5的所有型号都配备了4GB的内存（其他市场也有6GB内存的版本）。这款手机起价189.99欧元（167美元），存储容量为64GB，存储容量为128GB，价格高出20欧元（21美元）。

像许多经济型手机一样，小米Poco M5仍然有一个耳机插孔。充电是通过USB-C接口完成的，它只支持非常迟缓的USB 2.0速度的数据传输。这款手机的一个独特功能是它的红外辐射器，你可以用它来控制电视等设备。

手机上还有NFC--对于200欧元（210美元）以下的手机来说，这并不总是个好办法。这意味着你可以在Poco M5上使用移动支付服务（如谷歌支付）。

微型SD卡读卡器

该智能手机可以同时容纳两张纳米SIM卡。还有一个单独的microSD卡插槽用于存储扩展。当我们用我们的参考microSD卡（Angelbird V60）进行测试时，读卡器相当快速和可靠。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)	30.6 MB/s +24%
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)	24.6 MB/s
Motorola Moto G22 PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)	24.3 MB/s -1%
Realme Narzo 50A Prime Mali-G52 MP1, T7225 (T612), 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)	18.7 MB/s -24%
Xiaomi Poco C40 Mali-G52 MP1, JR510, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)	16.8 MB/s -32%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø37.7 (21.8-45.3)

Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø36.1 (18.4-50)

Xiaomi Poco C40 Mali-G52 MP1, JR510, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø34.6 (25.1-45)

Realme Narzo 50A Prime Mali-G52 MP1, T7225 (T612), 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø31.6 (20.7-48.6)

Motorola Moto G22 PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø35.9 (20.7-46.1)

Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76 (40-79.1)

Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø72.7 (46.8-80.1)

Xiaomi Poco C40 Mali-G52 MP1, JR510, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø68.2 (48.1-73.5)

Realme Narzo 50A Prime Mali-G52 MP1, T7225 (T612), 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø73.4 (28.2-83.5)

Motorola Moto G22 PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø72.5 (27.9-75.8)

软件 - 暂时只有Android 12

MIUI 13是基于Android 12。手机上的安全补丁是2022年10月的，因此在这次审查时仍然是非常最新的。与小米Poco M5s不同的是，Poco M5并不在小米设备的名单上，这些设备被认证为谷歌的AER计划，并对其更新支持期进行了规定。不过，根据我们以前使用小米设备的经验，我们预计在2024年之前至少会有一次操作系统更新以及安全更新。

许多应用程序已经开箱预装在手机上，其中一些是小米获得报酬在设备上安装的第三方应用程序（包括游戏）。如果你喜欢你的系统干净，你需要先手动删除任何不需要的应用程序。

连接性和GNSS - Poco M5不支持5G

如前所述，你在小米Poco M5上不会得到任何5G连接。大多数5G手机都比200欧元（210美元）贵得多。

如果你想带着Poco M5旅行，我们建议你检查该设备是否与目的地国家的蜂窝数据网络兼容。这款价格低廉的设备并不是一款适合环游世界的手机。

在我们使用参考路由器华硕ROG Rapture AXE11000的测试中，Poco M5的Wi-Fi 5芯片提供了很好的结果，并超过了这个价格范围内大多数智能手机的无线解决方案。通过Wi-Fi访问互联网是快速和稳定的。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone (34.8 - 1875, n=191, last 2 years)	711 MBit/s +100%
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	356 (333^min - 363^max) MBit/s
Motorola Moto G22 PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash	326 (305^min - 332^max) MBit/s -8%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	305 (282^min - 324^max) MBit/s -14%
Xiaomi Poco C40 Mali-G52 MP1, JR510, 32 GB eMMC Flash	272 (225^min - 331^max) MBit/s -24%
Realme Narzo 50A Prime Mali-G52 MP1, T7225 (T612), 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	259 (196^min - 267^max) MBit/s -27%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone (40.5 - 1810, n=193, last 2 years)	725 MBit/s +96%
Motorola Moto G22 PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash	370 (351^min - 376^max) MBit/s 0%
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	370 (332^min - 381^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	369 (321^min - 376^max) MBit/s 0%
Xiaomi Poco C40 Mali-G52 MP1, JR510, 32 GB eMMC Flash	364 (299^min - 378^max) MBit/s -2%
Realme Narzo 50A Prime Mali-G52 MP1, T7225 (T612), 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	351 (317^min - 366^max) MBit/s -5%

Xiaomi Poco M5; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø355 (333-363)

Xiaomi Poco M5; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø371 (332-381)

在户外，这款手机的位置追踪精确到大约2米（6.6英尺）。Poco M5能够与全球主要卫星网络进行可靠的通信，甚至使用SBAS来进一步提高精确度。

尽管如此，理论仍然是理论。对于我们的真实测试，我们跳上自行车，带着它去兜风。在这次测试中，小米Poco M5在定位追踪的准确性方面肯定表现出一些问题：手机显示，我们主要是骑车穿过房屋和前花园，而不是在路上。拐角和转弯处经常被切断，而且大多数时候，我们无法正确判断我们是在街道的哪一边骑行。

因此，如果你非常依赖智能手机的导航，有更准确的选择，即使在这个价格范围内。

通话功能和语音质量 - 语音可以更加饱满

小米Poco M5使用谷歌的电话呼叫应用程序，运行良好，设计非常简洁。其他的通话应用程序也可以安装在手机上，但你应该谨慎行事，选择一个有信誉的开发商的应用程序。

在我们的测试电话中，另一端的人听起来相当远，而且通过内置的耳边扬声器听起来不是很饱满。然而，我们的声音很清晰，可以理解，没有任何背景噪音。当我们使用免提麦克风和内置扬声器时，对方在我们这一端听起来更清晰，但他们的声音伴随着一些小噪音。在免提模式下，手机能清晰地接收到我们的声音，即使我们轻声说话。

照相机 - 预算部分的标准费用

背面的主摄像头有一个5000万像素的三星传感器，两侧只有一个200万像素的微距摄像头和一个深度摄像头。相机的设置与你在许多其他经济型手机上看到的类似。比如说 realme Narzo 50A Prime拥有与Poco M5几乎相同的相机规格。

主摄像头制作的图像看起来相当暗，在清晰度方面可以做得更好，而且仔细检查后发现细节不多。在低光照条件下，黑暗区域看起来是黑色的，而且图像变得非常有颗粒感。这个设置对于快照来说是足够的，但现在有更好的手机摄像头。

这款手机允许用户以30帧/秒的速度录制1080p视频。曝光校正做得很好，但自动对焦可以稍微快一点。你也不应该期待相机的色彩鲜艳。

小米安装了一个分辨率仅为500万的前置摄像头。用该相机拍摄的自拍第一眼可能看起来很好，但仔细观察，暗处缺乏清晰度和细节。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera Blume Hauptkamera Umgebung Hauptkamera Low Light

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

我们还在实验室里对主相机进行了测试。在最佳照明条件下，该相机拍出的照片暗淡无光，但对比度很好。边缘的清晰度也有相当大的下降。在光照强度仅为1勒克斯的情况下，较亮的颜色仍然可以感觉到，但图像最终会变得非常有颗粒感。

ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco M5: 6.72 ∆E min: 3.54 - max: 8.77 ∆E

附件和保修 - 包括充电器

Poco M5配备了相当可观的配件：充电器、USB-C电缆、SIM卡弹出工具和硅胶保护壳都包含在盒子里，这意味着你不必马上购买其他东西来满足日常使用。

小米在欧盟为Poco M5提供24个月的保修。然而，保修条款和条件可能因国家而异。你可以参考Poco的保修页面了解更多信息。

输入设备和操作 - 迅捷的指纹传感器

触摸屏使用起来很舒服，而且高度可靠。由于其90Hz刷新率和240Hz触摸采样率，它的运行也非常流畅。

指纹传感器被集成到机身右侧的电源按钮上。它能够非常可靠地识别手指，并或多或少地立即解锁手机。

你也可以用你的脸来解锁手机。虽然这种方法的效果一样好，但它的安全性稍差。

▶ load Youtube video

显示屏 - 高分辨率，但不太明亮

即使在今天，你仍然无法在每一部低于200欧元（210美元）的手机上找到全高清显示屏。Poco M5在这个部门做得很好，采用了1080p屏幕。

不幸的是，显示屏的亮度就不一样了：即使环境光传感器暴露在强烈的光线下，屏幕的亮度也没有超过402cd/m²。这个峰值亮度明显低于竞争对手所能达到的水平。

也就是说，亮度分布是非常均匀的。而且，由于其低黑度，该显示器能够提供合理的对比度水平。


389 cd/m²	402 cd/m²	396 cd/m²
387 cd/m²	400 cd/m²	399 cd/m²
386 cd/m²	401 cd/m²	400 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 402 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 395.6 cd/m² Minimum: 0.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 400 cd/m²
Contrast: 1481:1 (Black: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.26 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.298

	Xiaomi Poco M5 IPS, 2408x1080, 6.6"	Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F PLS, 2408x1080, 6.6"	Xiaomi Poco C40 IPS, 1650x720, 6.7"	Realme Narzo 50A Prime IPS, 2408x1080, 6.6"	Motorola Moto G22 IPS LCD, 1600x720, 6.5"
Screen		-77%	-113%	-77%	-123%
Brightness middle	400	492 23%	468 17%	540 35%	451 13%
Brightness	396	453 14%	450 14%	523 32%	431 9%
Brightness Distribution	96	87 -9%	92 -4%	93 -3%	90 -6%
Black Level *	0.27	0.37 -37%	0.4 -48%	0.39 -44%	0.5 -85%
Contrast	1481	1330 -10%	1170 -21%	1385 -6%	902 -39%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.26	4.34 -244%	4.53 -260%	4.39 -248%	5.82 -362%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.45	5.94 -142%	8.96 -266%	6.65 -171%	9.3 -280%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.5	4.7 -213%	6.5 -333%	4.7 -213%	5 -233%
Gamma	2.298 ^96%	2.398 ^92%	2.191 ^100%	2.261 ^97%	2.776 ^79%
CCT	6658 ^98%	7668 ^85%	8122 ^80%	7597 ^86%	7683 ^85%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在色彩再现方面，这个价格范围内的其他手机都无法与小米Poco M5相比。这款手机的显示屏非常忠实地再现了色彩，在显示灰色阴影时没有表现出任何蓝色的色调。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 11 ms rise
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
33 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18 ms rise
33 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

高反射率的显示屏使得这款手机很难在阳光直射的户外使用，尽管你仍然可以部分看清屏幕上的内容。

可感知的屏幕亮度只随你的观察角度略有变化。否则，无论你从哪里看，屏幕上的内容都很容易阅读。

性能 - 具有很大的冲击力

Poco M5的SoC系统在这个价位上提供了很多性能。它是联发科Helio G99总共有八个核心，分布在两个集群中，时钟速度高达2.2GHz。因此，在Geekbench的CPU基准测试中，Poco M5的得分有时比其他200欧元（210美元）以下的手机高2倍甚至3倍。

在日常使用中，这意味着你可以在大多数情况下没有任何卡顿地浏览菜单，而且手机有足够的性能来处理要求稍高的应用程序。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=176, last 2 years)	1037 Points +89%
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	548 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (490 - 576, n=17)	547 Points 0%
Realme Narzo 50A Prime Unisoc T7225 (T612), Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	346 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	300 Points -45%
Motorola Moto G22 Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	172 Points -69%
Xiaomi Poco C40 JLQ JR510, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072	164 Points -70%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 8816, n=176, last 2 years)	3464 Points +80%
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	1924 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1670 - 1981, n=17)	1828 Points -5%
Realme Narzo 50A Prime Unisoc T7225 (T612), Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	1311 Points -32%
Motorola Moto G22 Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	947 Points -51%
Xiaomi Poco C40 JLQ JR510, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072	818 Points -57%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	790 Points -59%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (99654 - 2056989, n=104, last 2 years)	810694 Points +140%
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	337968 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (229468 - 375956, n=8)	317183 Points -6%
Xiaomi Poco C40 JLQ JR510, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072	119447 Points -65%
Motorola Moto G22 Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	111952 Points -67%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone (4609 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years)	13179 Points +37%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (8885 - 11379, n=17)	9894 Points +3%
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	9587 Points
Realme Narzo 50A Prime Unisoc T7225 (T612), Mali-G52 MP1, 4096	7610 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	5589 Points -42%
Motorola Moto G22 Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	4922 Points -49%
Xiaomi Poco C40 JLQ JR510, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072	4780 Points -50%

CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 2485, n=164, last 2 years)	920 Points +53%
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	602 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (526 - 602, n=10)	565 Points -6%
Xiaomi Poco C40 JLQ JR510, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072	280 Points -53%
Motorola Moto G22 Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	232 Points -61%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 12993, n=158, last 2 years)	6499 Points +113%
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	3050 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (2855 - 3120, n=10)	3006 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G22 Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	1226 Points -60%
Xiaomi Poco C40 JLQ JR510, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072	411 Points -87%
System
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 17953, n=158, last 2 years)	10346 Points +56%
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	6637 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (5261 - 6776, n=10)	6230 Points -6%
Xiaomi Poco C40 JLQ JR510, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072	2651 Points -60%
Motorola Moto G22 Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	2565 Points -61%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 18911, n=158, last 2 years)	7058 Points +86%
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	3802 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (3454 - 4152, n=10)	3764 Points -1%
Xiaomi Poco C40 JLQ JR510, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072	1428 Points -62%
Motorola Moto G22 Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	1210 Points -68%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=158, last 2 years)	17998 Points +556%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (2683 - 3002, n=10)	2799 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	2744 Points
Motorola Moto G22 Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	1017 Points -63%
Xiaomi Poco C40 JLQ JR510, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072	764 Points -72%
Web
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2363, n=158, last 2 years)	1578 Points +26%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1150 - 1325, n=10)	1252 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	1250 Points
Motorola Moto G22 Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	718 Points -43%
Xiaomi Poco C40 JLQ JR510, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072	10 Points -99%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 81594, n=150, last 2 years)	17814 Points +88%
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	9493 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (6323 - 9695, n=9)	8584 Points -10%
Motorola Moto G22 Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	2514 Points -74%
Xiaomi Poco C40 JLQ JR510, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072	207 Points -98%

AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 307528, n=143, last 2 years)	25319 Points +2745%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (877 - 982, n=8)	908 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	890 Points

在图形性能方面，Poco M5也超过了其他类似价格的手机。

尽管如此，在非常基本的图形基准测试中，这款手机只达到了60帧，并很快跌破了30帧大关。你可能不应该指望这款手机能很好地运行对图形要求高的应用程序。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	323 Points
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	171 Points -47%
Realme Narzo 50A Prime Mali-G52 MP1, T7225 (T612), 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	111 Points -66%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	342 Points
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	171 Points -50%
Realme Narzo 50A Prime Mali-G52 MP1, T7225 (T612), 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	115 Points -66%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1155 Points
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	682 Points -41%
Realme Narzo 50A Prime Mali-G52 MP1, T7225 (T612), 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	410 Points -65%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1205 Points
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	682 Points -43%
Realme Narzo 50A Prime Mali-G52 MP1, T7225 (T612), 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	411 Points -66%
Motorola Moto G22 PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2838 Points
Realme Narzo 50A Prime Mali-G52 MP1, T7225 (T612), 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2526 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2310 Points -19%
Motorola Moto G22 PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2145 Points -24%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2378 Points
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1205 Points -49%
Realme Narzo 50A Prime Mali-G52 MP1, T7225 (T612), 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	812 Points -66%
Motorola Moto G22 PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash	584 Points -75%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2467 Points
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1348 Points -45%
Realme Narzo 50A Prime Mali-G52 MP1, T7225 (T612), 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	956 Points -61%
Motorola Moto G22 PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash	657 Points -73%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3727 Points
Realme Narzo 50A Prime Mali-G52 MP1, T7225 (T612), 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2909 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2636 Points -29%
Xiaomi Poco C40 Mali-G52 MP1, JR510, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1840 Points -51%
Motorola Moto G22 PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1283 Points -66%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2413 Points
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1192 Points -51%
Realme Narzo 50A Prime Mali-G52 MP1, T7225 (T612), 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	829 Points -66%
Xiaomi Poco C40 Mali-G52 MP1, JR510, 32 GB eMMC Flash	508 Points -79%
Motorola Moto G22 PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash	460 Points -81%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2618 Points
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1357 Points -48%
Realme Narzo 50A Prime Mali-G52 MP1, T7225 (T612), 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	986 Points -62%
Xiaomi Poco C40 Mali-G52 MP1, JR510, 32 GB eMMC Flash	605 Points -77%
Motorola Moto G22 PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash	536 Points -80%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2535 Points
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1329 Points -48%
Realme Narzo 50A Prime Mali-G52 MP1, T7225 (T612), 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	979 Points -61%
Xiaomi Poco C40 Mali-G52 MP1, JR510, 32 GB eMMC Flash	607 Points -76%
Motorola Moto G22 PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash	453 Points -82%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2356 Points
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1182 Points -50%
Realme Narzo 50A Prime Mali-G52 MP1, T7225 (T612), 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	826 Points -65%
Xiaomi Poco C40 Mali-G52 MP1, JR510, 32 GB eMMC Flash	512 Points -78%
Motorola Moto G22 PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash	383 Points -84%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3450 Points
Realme Narzo 50A Prime Mali-G52 MP1, T7225 (T612), 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2773 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2347 Points -32%
Xiaomi Poco C40 Mali-G52 MP1, JR510, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1734 Points -50%
Motorola Moto G22 PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1265 Points -63%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	54 fps
Motorola Moto G22 PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash	29 fps -46%
Xiaomi Poco C40 Mali-G52 MP1, JR510, 32 GB eMMC Flash	28 fps -48%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	64 fps
Motorola Moto G22 PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash	22 fps -66%
Xiaomi Poco C40 Mali-G52 MP1, JR510, 32 GB eMMC Flash	19 fps -70%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	36 fps
Motorola Moto G22 PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash	18 fps -50%
Xiaomi Poco C40 Mali-G52 MP1, JR510, 32 GB eMMC Flash	18 fps -50%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	40 fps
Motorola Moto G22 PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash	12 fps -70%
Xiaomi Poco C40 Mali-G52 MP1, JR510, 32 GB eMMC Flash	11 fps -72%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	22 fps
Xiaomi Poco C40 Mali-G52 MP1, JR510, 32 GB eMMC Flash	13 fps -41%
Motorola Moto G22 PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash	12 fps -45%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	25 fps
Motorola Moto G22 PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash	7.5 fps -70%
Xiaomi Poco C40 Mali-G52 MP1, JR510, 32 GB eMMC Flash	6.6 fps -74%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	12 fps
Xiaomi Poco C40 Mali-G52 MP1, JR510, 32 GB eMMC Flash	7.4 fps -38%
Motorola Moto G22 PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash	5.4 fps -55%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	15 fps
Xiaomi Poco C40 Mali-G52 MP1, JR510, 32 GB eMMC Flash	4.2 fps -72%
Motorola Moto G22 PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash	3.5 fps -77%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.8 fps
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	5.1 fps -42%
Motorola Moto G22 PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash	5 fps -43%
Xiaomi Poco C40 Mali-G52 MP1, JR510, 32 GB eMMC Flash	4.5 fps -49%
Realme Narzo 50A Prime Mali-G52 MP1, T7225 (T612), 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3 fps -66%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.8 fps
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	3.3 fps -43%
Realme Narzo 50A Prime Mali-G52 MP1, T7225 (T612), 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2 fps -66%
Motorola Moto G22 PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1.5 fps -74%
Xiaomi Poco C40 Mali-G52 MP1, JR510, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1.4 fps -76%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	14 fps
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	8.1 fps -42%
Motorola Moto G22 PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash	7 fps -50%
Xiaomi Poco C40 Mali-G52 MP1, JR510, 32 GB eMMC Flash	7 fps -50%
Realme Narzo 50A Prime Mali-G52 MP1, T7225 (T612), 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4.7 fps -66%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	16 fps
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	9.2 fps -42%
Realme Narzo 50A Prime Mali-G52 MP1, T7225 (T612), 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.4 fps -66%
Motorola Moto G22 PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash	4 fps -75%
Xiaomi Poco C40 Mali-G52 MP1, JR510, 32 GB eMMC Flash	3.9 fps -76%

对于网络浏览，Poco M5同样比其他同等价位的手机要快得多。

网站在手机上能迅速呈现，当用户还在滚动的时候，图片往往就已经出现了。即使是复杂的HTML5网页，在M5上大多数时候也能快速加载。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)	124.4 Points +165%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (46.9 - 80.9, n=9)	66.5 Points +42%
Xiaomi Poco M5 (Chrome 107)	46.877 Points
Motorola Moto G22 (Chrome101)	21.156 Points -55%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)	143.9 runs/min +497%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (24.1 - 80.7, n=9)	52.5 runs/min +118%
Xiaomi Poco M5 (Chome 107)	24.09 runs/min
Motorola Moto G22 (Chrome101)	15.01 runs/min -38%
Xiaomi Poco C40 (Chome 106)	14.9 runs/min -38%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years)	117.1 Points +200%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (39 - 89, n=9)	69.6 Points +78%
Xiaomi Poco M5 (Chrome 107)	39 Points
Xiaomi Poco C40 (Chrome 106)	25 Points -36%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	150.2 Points +71%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (80 - 112, n=8)	95.4 Points +8%
Xiaomi Poco M5 (Chrome 107)	88 Points
Xiaomi Poco C40 (Chrome 106)	46 Points -48%
Motorola Moto G22 (Chrome101)	37 Points -58%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)	38550 Points +124%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (17228 - 25005, n=17)	20999 Points +22%
Xiaomi Poco M5 (Chrome 107)	17228 Points
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F (Chrome 107)	12253 Points -29%
Xiaomi Poco C40 (Chrome 106)	5975 Points -65%
Motorola Moto G22 (Chrome101)	5648 Points -67%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Motorola Moto G22 (Chrome101)	9051.2 ms * -309%
Xiaomi Poco C40 (Chrome 106)	8973 ms * -305%
Xiaomi Poco M5 (Chrome 107)	2213.3 ms *
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1671 - 2444, n=9)	2058 ms * +7%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)	1523 ms * +31%

* ... smaller is better

Poco M5的UFS 2.2存储系统具有令人印象深刻的高读/写速度，特别是在这个价格范围。在我们比较的所有设备中，只有 realme Narzo 50A Prime接近赶上M5。

	Xiaomi Poco M5	Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F	Xiaomi Poco C40	Realme Narzo 50A Prime	Motorola Moto G22	Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-70%	-80%	-35%	-86%	-29%	49%
Sequential Read 256KB	976.4	300.6 -69%	281.7 -71%	852.8 -13%	215.45 -78%	728 ?(303 - 1038, n=71) -25%	1887 ?(226 - 4512, n=198, last 2 years) 93%
Sequential Write 256KB	870.7	230.3 -74%	129.8 -85%	266 -69%	112.78 -87%	527 ?(103.2 - 903, n=71) -39%	1471 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=198, last 2 years) 69%
Random Read 4KB	247.6	94.5 -62%	29.2 -88%	145.3 -41%	39.32 -84%	191.7 ?(89.3 - 297, n=71) -23%	278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=198, last 2 years) 12%
Random Write 4KB	257.8	61.5 -76%	67.7 -74%	212.5 -18%	16.34 -94%	185.8 ?(62.6 - 419, n=71) -28%	311 ?(9.4 - 753, n=198, last 2 years) 21%

游戏 - 很少超过30 fps

尽管提供了巨大的价值，但Poco M5并不是一款真正的游戏手机。我们在该设备上测试的游戏就强调了这一点。快节奏的射击游戏Armajet在手机上只能以30帧运行。虽然这对基本的游戏来说是足够的，但游戏本身感觉很迟钝。

同样，在图形要求更高的PUBG移动游戏中，Poco M5在低设置下提供的帧数不超过40帧。诚然，这款游戏是可以玩的，但在更高的设置下，你必须忍受一些卡顿，这可能是胜利和失败之间的区别。我们使用GameBench的软件测量了帧率。.

Xiaomi Poco M5; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø29.8 (29-31)

Xiaomi Poco M5; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 2.3.0: Ø39.9 (38-41)

Xiaomi Poco M5; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.3.0: Ø29.9 (28-31)

排放 - 几乎没有热量，扬声器很弱

温度

小米Poco M5只是适度发热（40.1°C，或104.2°F），但从未发热，即使在长时间满负荷运行后也是如此。

这款手机能够非常好地应对3DMark压力测试，在20次循环后只表现出最小的性能损失。

Max. Load

Idle


40.1 °C	33.7 °C	30.9 °C
38.9 °C	33.2 °C	30.9 °C
37.3 °C	33.3 °C	31 °C

Maximum: 40.1 °C
Average: 34.4 °C


29.8 °C	32.9 °C	37.7 °C
30.9 °C	33.7 °C	37.5 °C
31.3 °C	34.3 °C	36.3 °C

Maximum: 37.7 °C
Average: 33.8 °C

Power Supply (max.) 39.9 °C | Room Temperature 20.2 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.8 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	98.7 %
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	97.9 % -1%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	98.2 % 0%
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	97.8 %

Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø2.05 (2.02-2.07)

Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø1.044 (1.037-1.056)

Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.44 (7.37-7.47)

Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.12 (4.05-4.14)

演讲者

Poco M5的单声道扬声器产生的声音真的很薄，很尖锐，让音乐听起来更像是一团乱麻--特别是当许多乐器同时出现时。好吧，至少声音通过扬声器是可以理解的。

你也可以通过蓝牙或3.5毫米音频插孔轻松地将外部音频设备（如耳机和扬声器）连接到手机上。M5支持广泛的蓝牙音频编解码，包括aptX TWS+和LHDC 4。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Poco M5 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Motorola Moto G22 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 很好的耐力

消耗功率

在高负荷下，Poco M5的耗电量比同类智能手机略高。然而，该设备在闲置时的用电量是相当典型的。

使用附带的电源适配器，手机中的5000毫安时电池可在18瓦特的条件下充电。为M5完全充电需要略多于两个小时。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0 / 0.1 Watt
Idle	0.9 / 1.3 / 1.9 Watt
Load	4.6 / 6.8 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Poco M5 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Poco C40 6000 mAh	Motorola Moto G22 5000 mAh	Average Mediatek Helio G99	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		3%	11%	-19%	-17%
Idle Minimum *	0.9	1.2 -33%	0.9 -0%	1.037 ?(0.7 - 1.9, n=9) -15%	0.883 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=160, last 2 years) 2%
Idle Average *	1.3	1.5 -15%	1.2 8%	1.917 ?(1.1 - 4.02, n=9) -47%	1.467 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=160, last 2 years) -13%
Idle Maximum *	1.9	1.7 11%	1.5 21%	2.16 ?(1.33 - 4.07, n=9) -14%	1.621 ?(0.83 - 4.46, n=160, last 2 years) 15%
Load Average *	4.6	3.5 24%	4.5 2%	5.11 ?(2.9 - 7.49, n=9) -11%	6.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=154, last 2 years) -42%
Load Maximum *	6.8	4.9 28%	5.2 24%	7.36 ?(4.8 - 10.2, n=9) -8%	9.9 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=154, last 2 years) -46%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Poco M5; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.74 (2.91-6.79)

Xiaomi Poco M5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.241 (0.963-1.783)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Poco M5; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.17 (4.7-5.89)

Xiaomi Poco M5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.241 (0.963-1.783)

电池寿命

在我们的Wi-Fi测试中，5,000毫安时的电池可以让M5持续运行15小时16分钟。对于这个价格类别的设备来说，这是一个很好的结果。尽管如此，在我们的比较中，还有其他电池寿命更长的手机，例如摩托罗拉Moto G22.评测机型在适度使用的情况下，一次充电持续两天应该没有问题。

该设备在满负荷运行时也有很好的电源管理，所以你可以期待在大量使用时有超过6小时的电池寿命。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		41h 43min
WiFi Websurfing		15h 16min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		18h 07min
Load (maximum brightness)		6h 08min

	Xiaomi Poco M5 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Poco C40 6000 mAh	Realme Narzo 50A Prime 5000 mAh	Motorola Moto G22 5000 mAh
Battery Runtime		-2%	18%	-5%	6%
Reader / Idle	2503		2856 14%		2785 11%
H.264	1087		1249 15%		1196 10%
WiFi v1.3	916	896 -2%	1205 32%	874 -5%	1101 20%
Load	368		402 9%		298 -19%

Pros

+ 性能优异，物有所值

+ 迅捷的存储

+ 支持许多蓝牙编解码器

+ 负载下没有节流现象

+ 准确和快速的指纹识别传感器

+ 与Wi-Fi 5的良好数据传输率

+ 盒子里有充电器

Cons

- 没有更新的承诺

- 不支持5G

- 嘈杂的扬声器

- 位置跟踪不准确

评语--规格合适，性价比很高

小米的Poco M5做到了一个价格在200欧元（210美元）左右的智能手机所要求的。它还提供快速而稳定的互联网连接，高分辨率的显示屏，时尚的机身，最重要的是，它的性能非常出色。

该产品的其他优势包括支持许多蓝牙编解码器，提供的一系列配件（包括充电器）和精确的指纹传感器。

另一方面，在日常使用中，导航和定位精度并不是这款手机的强项。这款价格低廉的小米智能手机在这些方面未能给人留下深刻印象。同样，对于这个价格范围内的设备来说，相机充其量也是一般，而且扬声器听起来非常尖锐。如果你在市场上寻找一款非常轻便的智能手机，你也应该到其他地方去看看。

小米Poco M5在其价格类别中提供了卓越的性能，并提供了物美价廉的规格。然而，它在相机、扬声器和位置跟踪能力方面也有不足之处。

制造商在SoC的选择上真正做到了运筹帷幄，使Poco M5成为对预算敏感的消费者在性能上不妥协的最佳推荐。

凤凰卫视波克C40和摩托罗拉Moto G22都有较长的电池寿命，但你不得不忍受明显较低的性能。真正的 Narzo 50A Prime具有非常快的存储和充电技术，但缺乏NFC支持。

价格和可用性

在德国，Poco M5可以直接从制造商那里购买https://www.mi.com/de/product/poco-m5/?skupanel=1&gid=4223400084以大约170欧元（176美元）的折扣价购买64GB的基本版本。或者你可以多花20欧元（21美元）购买128GB型号。

拥有128GB存储空间的Poco M5目前在Amazon.co.uk上仅售165英镑。.你可以访问Poco的全球网站了解更多关于该手机的国际发售信息。

Xiaomi Poco M5 - 11/24/2022 v7 ^(old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis

81%

Keyboard

65 / 75 → 87%

Pointing Device

92%

Connectivity

46 / 70 → 66%

Weight

88%

Battery

91%

Display

90%

Games Performance

27 / 64 → 42%

Application Performance

72 / 86 → 84%

Temperature

93%

Noise

100%

Audio

50 / 90 → 56%

Camera

51%

Average

73%

79%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Zhiwei Zhuang - Translator - 196 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 470341 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 小米Poco M5智能手机评测--价格低廉的手机，却蕴含着巨大的能量

Florian Schmitt, 2022-11-30 (Update: 2024-08-15)

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳 - 耐指纹的人造革

尺寸比较

规格 - 包括NFC

微型SD卡读卡器

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

软件 - 暂时只有Android 12

连接性和GNSS - Poco M5不支持5G

通话功能和语音质量 - 语音可以更加饱满

照相机 - 预算部分的标准费用

附件和保修 - 包括充电器

输入设备和操作 - 迅捷的指纹传感器

显示屏 - 高分辨率，但不太明亮

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - 具有很大的冲击力

游戏 - 很少超过30 fps

排放 - 几乎没有热量，扬声器很弱

温度

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

演讲者

Xiaomi Poco M5 audio analysis

Motorola Moto G22 audio analysis

电池寿命 - 很好的耐力

消耗功率

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

评语--规格合适，性价比很高

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Price comparison