Notebookcheck Logo

华硕ProArt StudioBook Pro 16 W7600笔记本电脑在审查:强大而轻便的工作站

设计师的书?

华硕推出了ProArt Studiobook W7600,这是世界上第一款配备16英寸4K OLED HDR显示屏的笔记本。此外,它不仅结构紧凑,重量相对较轻,而且还应该以大的性能数据来说服人。该设备还有一个额外的功能,应该有利于创意工作者和设计师。
Workstation Tiger Lake Thunderbolt Laptop / Notebook Geforce

通过ProArt Studiobook Pro 16,华硕为创意专业人士推出了一个新的笔记本系列。这款创作型笔记本采用了16:10长宽比的4K OLED HDR显示屏,从而提供了更大的工作面。此外,还有一个华硕表盘,可以用来控制各种创意工具,因此应该是为了简化设计师的工作。制造商在设备方面拿出了大杀器,因为不仅有英特尔第三代至强CPU,而且还有工作站的GPU Nvidia RTX A5000.因此,该系列针对的是专业用户,应该可以处理3D渲染或高分辨率视频编辑等复杂任务。由于华硕德国公司提供给我们的测试装置是一个预先样品,该设备还没有得到我们的评级。

竞争对手包括HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 ,这是一款配置相同的工作站,以及HP ZBook Studio 15 G8戴尔Precision 5560

Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 (ProArt StudioBook 16 Series)
Processor
Intel Xeon W-11955M 8 x 2.6 - 5 GHz, 109 W PL2 / Short Burst, 90 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, Core: 1350 MHz, RAM: 1500 MHz, 90 W TDP ( including 20 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, Optimus, Resizable BAR, NVIDIA 466.60, Intel UHD Graphics
Memory
64 GB 
, Dual-Channel
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 3840 x 2400 pixel 283 PPI, ATNA60YV02-0, OLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel WM590 (Tiger Lake PCH-H)
Storage
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0), 4096 GB 
, 3600 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Tiger Lake PCH-H - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo, Card Reader: SD
Networking
Realtek Semiconductor RTL8168/8111 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet NIC (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 21.4 x 362 x 264
Battery
90 Wh Lithium-Ion, 4-cell
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes
Weight
2.4 kg, Power Supply: 764 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price

v (old)
12 / 2021
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
W-11955M, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg21.4 mm16.00"3840x2400
90.3 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2021
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
i9-11950H, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg25.9 mm15.60"3840x2160
87.8 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2021
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
i9-11950H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
1.9 kg18 mm15.60"3840x2160
88.3 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2021
Dell Precision 5000 5560
i7-11850H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
2 kg18 mm15.60"3840x2400

案例

华硕ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H
华硕ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H

华硕ProArt StudioBook 16的外壳非常结实,2.4公斤的重量对于它的尺寸来说是比较轻的。外壳由金属制成,并涂有镁合金,这使其具有哑光、闪光和也比较粗糙的表面。该设备的一个特殊功能是华硕拨号控制器,它被嵌入到触控板旁边,例如,可以使控制图像和视频编辑程序中的一些功能特别精确。此外,华硕拨号控制器还可用于快速调整系统的亮度或音量。华硕ProArt StudioBook 16的设计很得体,键盘、触控板和华硕拨号器的排列看起来非常整齐。这款机箱的突出之处在于其高脚,这应该是为了让用户在打字时更加舒适。这些高脚导致键盘比掌托高。华硕还在支架的背面中央做了一个凹槽,让更多的新鲜空气通过,以优化设备的冷却。

华硕ProArt StudioBook拥有16英寸显示屏,整体高度只有2.1厘米,令人惊讶的是它很苗条。虽然 惠普ZBook Fury显示屏较小,外部略窄,但比我们的设备高了近半厘米。除了ZBook Fury之外,所有对手在重量方面都明显领先。

Size comparison

362 mm 264 mm 21.4 mm 2.4 kg357 mm 242.5 mm 25.9 mm 2.5 kg354 mm 235 mm 18 mm 1.9 kg344.72 mm 230.14 mm 18 mm 2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

装备

笔记本的端口分布在两边:在左边,有Kensington Lock、USB-A 3.2 Gen.2、电源接口、HDMI 2.1、Thunderbolt 4和一个USB-C 3.2 Gen 2端口,此外还有冷却系统的通风口。通风口就像左边一样延伸到右边的位置。右侧还有一个全尺寸的SD读卡器、一个3.5毫米的组合插孔、USB-A 3.2 Gen.2和千兆网。Thunderbolt 4和USB-C端口都支持Power Delivery,并允许各连接一个显示器。这些端口的间距足够大,当所有端口都被占用时,不会影响用户的舒适度。只有冷却系统的出风口位于笔记本的背面。

右侧。SD读卡器,3.5毫米音频,USB-A 3.2 Gen.2,千兆位网络
右侧。SD读卡器,3.5毫米音频,USB-A 3.2 Gen.2,千兆位网络
左侧:1个Kensington锁,USB-A 3.2 Gen.2,电源端口,HDMI 2.1,1个Thunderbolt 4,USB-C 3.2 Gen.2
左侧:1个Kensington锁,USB-A 3.2 Gen.2,电源端口,HDMI 2.1,1个Thunderbolt 4,USB-C 3.2 Gen.2

SD卡阅读器

在我们的预生产设备中,集成的SD卡读卡器的传输率是比较差的。使用我们的AV PRO 128 GB V60参考存储卡,甚至连平均数据吞吐量都达不到。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell Precision 5000 5560
  (AV Pro V60)
196.9 MB/s +188%
Average of class Workstation
  (49.6 - 200, n=14, last 2 years)
92 MB/s +35%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
  (AV Pro V60)
75.6 MB/s +11%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
  (AV Pro V60)
73.8 MB/s +8%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
  (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
68.3 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell Precision 5000 5560
  (AV Pro V60)
198.4 MB/s +129%
Average of class Workstation
  (81.2 - 227, n=14, last 2 years)
117.7 MB/s +36%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
  (AV Pro V60)
88.6 MB/s +2%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
  (AV Pro V60)
87.2 MB/s +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
  (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
86.7 MB/s

沟通

在我们的性能测试中,安装在预生产设备中的英特尔Wi-Fi AX201无法发挥其性能潜力,最终比平均水平落后20%至60%。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1419 (1169min - 1609max) MBit/s +61%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1211 (954min - 1321max) MBit/s +37%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (49.8 - 1775, n=324)
1161 MBit/s +31%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
981 (864min - 1044max) MBit/s +11%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
884 (468min - 938max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1382 (1340min - 1446max) MBit/s +139%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1363 (1311min - 1453max) MBit/s +135%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (136 - 1743, n=324)
1261 MBit/s +118%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1249 (1170min - 1318max) MBit/s +116%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
579 (368min - 652max) MBit/s
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900Tooltip
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø579 (368-652)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø868 (468-938)

网络摄像头

我们测试设备中的720p网络摄像头的摄像质量非常差。与大多数竞争对手一样,它缺乏图像清晰度和色彩准确性。

ColorChecker
22.5 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
23.2 ∆E
21.9 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
28.7 ∆E
22.1 ∆E
26.5 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
27 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
28 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
21.8 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
19.5 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2: 18.37 ∆E min: 3.32 - max: 28.72 ∆E

维护

底板可以通过松开10个十字螺丝轻松地拆下来。在里面,用户可以直接接触到内存和固态硬盘的插槽,在我们的评测单元中,这些插槽都被完全占用。相应地,风扇也可以通过这种方式进行清洁。值得一提的是,冷却电路还覆盖了芯片组,甚至内存和SSD也有被动冷却。对于后者,底板上有额外的导热垫。

输入设备。使用华硕表盘的专业工作

键盘

华硕ProArt Studiobook 16的键盘的特点是具有良好的压力点。键盘有正常的大小,尽管表面比较粗糙,但打字时感觉非常舒适。敲击键盘的声音比较小,不会被认为是烦人的。键盘的照明可以在三个级别上进行调整。此外,还有华硕拨号控制器:由于圆形控制器的边缘符合人体工程学,可以非常精确地进行设置,而且也非常安静。例如,你可以直观地控制Photoshop中的画笔,或通过转盘轻松改变图层。缩放、导航或调整色彩平衡或色调,用表盘控制器应该很容易。我们的图片库显示了一些使用拨号控制器的例子。

键盘
键盘
键盘照明
键盘照明
华硕表盘控制器
华硕表盘控制器
华硕拨号控制器的应用样本
华硕拨号控制器的应用样本
应用样本 华硕拨号控制器
应用样本 华硕拨号控制器
应用样本 华硕拨号控制器
应用样本 华硕拨号控制器
应用样本 华硕拨号控制器
应用样本 华硕拨号控制器
 
 

触摸板

触摸板
触摸板

我们的预生产样品的触摸板为用户提供了一个大的表面,以及非常好的滑行性能。同样,多点触摸功能,如滚动或切换标签在这里也能顺利工作。特殊的3个按钮的触摸板适用于需要集中控制应用功能的3D设计师,如平移、旋转或绕圈。与华硕拨号盘结合起来,这两个功能对创意专业人士来说是一个真正的梦之队。

显示。世界上第一个16:10格式的4K OLED HDR面板

子像素
子像素

我们的评测样品有4K OLED HDR面板,屏幕对角线为16英寸,长宽比为16:10。它给人的第一印象很好,具有OLED面板的典型优势。此外,由于有潘通认证,它有非常好的工厂校准,因此完全适合编辑图片和视频。96%的照度是非常好的,只有最大亮度可以做得更好。除此之外,在测试中,我们可以在80%及以下的亮度水平上检测到频率为240赫兹的直流调光的PWM。竞争也可以得到一些分数:例如。 惠普ZBook Fury配备了不反光的120赫兹显示屏和更明亮的面板。然而,它也有一些缺点,比如画面的颗粒感,更多的光晕和更差的校准。

由于我们的预生产样品有一个OLED面板,所以没有屏幕渗漏。

369
cd/m²
361
cd/m²
363
cd/m²
360
cd/m²
353
cd/m²
362
cd/m²
357
cd/m²
357
cd/m²
362
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
ATNA60YV02-0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 369 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 360.4 cd/m² Minimum: 4.5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 354 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.45 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.77
ΔE Greyscale 1.88 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.31
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
ATNA60YV02-0, OLED, 3840x2400, 16"
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
BOE0969, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6"
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
SDC4145, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6"
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Sharp LQ156R1, IPS, 3840x2400, 15.6"
Display
-5%
-1%
-1%
Display P3 Coverage
99.9
95.9
-4%
99.9
0%
94.9
-5%
sRGB Coverage
100
100
0%
100
0%
100
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
98.6
87.3
-11%
95.3
-3%
100
1%
Response Times
-545%
-13%
-1840%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
2 ?(1, 1)
14.8 ?(7.6, 7.2)
-640%
2.4 ?(1, 1.4)
-20%
47.2 ?(25.2, 22)
-2260%
Response Time Black / White *
2 ?(1, 1)
11 ?(7.6, 3.4)
-450%
2.4 ?(1.1, 1.3)
-20%
30.4 ?(16.4, 14)
-1420%
PWM Frequency
240 ?(80)
240.4 ?(52)
0%
Screen
-40%
-36%
-24%
Brightness middle
353
626
77%
379.6
8%
501.5
42%
Brightness
360
589
64%
380
6%
467
30%
Brightness Distribution
96
87
-9%
95
-1%
83
-14%
Black Level *
0.58
0.44
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.45
5.41
-121%
5.15
-110%
4.73
-93%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.75
9.05
-141%
7.79
-108%
8.45
-125%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
2.77
0.6
78%
3.1
-12%
0.51
82%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.88
6.2
-230%
2.6
-38%
3.6
-91%
Gamma
2.31 95%
2.66 83%
1.99 111%
2.08 106%
CCT
6441 101%
6101 107%
6166 105%
6447 101%
Contrast
1079
1140
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-197% / -116%
-17% / -23%
-622% / -321%

* ... smaller is better

由于采用了4K OLED HDR显示屏,我们的预生产样品提供了极高的对比度和丰富、深沉的黑色。该面板完全覆盖了DCI-P3和sRGB色彩空间,在AdobeRGB 1998色彩空间中也提供了非常好的数值,达到了98.6%。此外,还有一个非常高的图像清晰度,提供了一个非常好的画面,这意味着该显示器符合专业图形编辑的要求。

灰度
灰度
灰度标定
灰度标定
饱和度
饱和度
饱和度校验
饱和度校验
颜色检测器
颜色检测器
校准的ColorChecker
校准的ColorChecker

我们的预生产测试样品只在有限的范围内适合于户外使用。350cd/m²的亮度和光面显示屏,即使在阴凉处,你的视野也已经很差了。在竞争者中惠普ZBook Fury由于安装了亮度超过600cd/m²的IPS面板,可以做得更好。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1 ms rise
↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1 ms rise
↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240 Hz ≤ 80 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 80 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

由于内置的OLED HDR面板,华硕ProArt Studiobook Pro 16 OLED的视角即使在非常倾斜的角度也很稳定。

观点
观点

性能。高级别的性能和复杂的冷却系统

华硕不做任何妥协,依靠英特尔和Nvidia目前为工作站提供的最新和最强大的组件。因此,一个 英特尔至强W-11955与64GB DDR4内存和2TB NVMe SSD Raid 0阵列一起在内部工作。图形负载分布在Nvidia RTX A5000和基于XE架构的英特尔UHD Graphics 。我们设备中安装的工作内存是ECC内存,时钟频率为3200MHz。不幸的是,SSD插槽只支持使用PCIe Gen.3的NVMe SSD。从配置的其他部分来看,PCIe Gen.4可能更合适。其他配置是否会出现是个问题,但这还有待观察。

处理器

现在让我们来谈谈老虎湖八核CPU,它在2021年第二季度推出。这款 英特尔至强W11955M是为移动工作站设计的,采用新的10纳米SuperFin工艺制造,相比之下 英特尔酷睿i9-11950H此外,还提供对ECC内存的支持。该芯片的TDP为45瓦,但在我们的测试样本中配置较高,并根据应用场景增加到永久性的54瓦。处理器内核的时钟频率为2.6至5GHz,支持DDR4-3200内存。

在我们的Cinebench Multi耐力测试中,性能达到了预期水平,因此很容易就超过了 惠普ZBook Fury的 英特尔酷睿i9-11950H安装。一方面,这也是由于安装的冷却系统,它也是为140W的综合TDP设计的。我们在性能模式下对该设备进行了测试,该模式在华硕ProArt Creator Hub中可用,并能根据所需任务动态调整冷却。对于日常任务,有标准模式,应用程序也允许将风扇设置为全速。然而,在测试中,这并不代表什么附加价值,除了当风扇以5,600转/分钟的高转速运行时,有必要戴上耳机。在电池模式下,该系统将我们的设备从54瓦降至15瓦,这在性能上也很明显。有关该处理器的更多细节可以在我们的 CPU部分

Cinebench R15 Multi endurance test

01002003004005006007008009001000110012001300140015001600170018001900Tooltip
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M: Ø1771 (1747.11-1845.61)
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H: Ø1775 (1695.06-1826.82)
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H: Ø1806 (1765.46-1841.11)
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H: Ø1525 (1468.05-1546.97)
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 Intel Core i7-11850H: Ø1803 (1759.48-1988.07)
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Workstation
  (11026 - 30783, n=30, last 2 years)
18161 Points +67%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
14066 Points +29%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
13012 Points +20%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
12247 (11482min - 12246.8max) Points +13%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
12166 (11410min - 12166.4max) Points +12%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
  (10862 - 12412, n=2)
11637 Points +7%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
10862 (10718min - 10862.2max) Points
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
9779 (9273.99min - 9779.26max) Points -10%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Average of class Workstation
  (1469 - 2178, n=30, last 2 years)
1843 Points +25%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
1619 Points +9%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
1596 Points +8%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
1575 Points +6%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
1569 Points +6%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
  (1480 - 1621, n=2)
1551 Points +5%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
1513 Points +2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
1480 Points
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Workstation
  (2990 - 11924, n=31, last 2 years)
6857 Points +61%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
5055 Points +19%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
4878 Points +15%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
4669 Points +10%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
4660 Points +10%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
4250 Points
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
  ()
4250 Points 0%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
3826 Points -10%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Workstation
  (564 - 827, n=31, last 2 years)
705 Points +24%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
634 Points +12%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
618 Points +9%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
610 Points +7%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
610 Points +7%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
583 Points +3%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
568 Points
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
  ()
568 Points 0%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Workstation
  (1863 - 5224, n=30, last 2 years)
2854 Points +55%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
2361 Points +28%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
2148 (1832.59min - 2147.65max) Points +16%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
1846 (1747.11min - 1845.61max) Points
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
  ()
1846 Points 0%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
1841 (1765.46min - 1841.11max) Points 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
1827 (1695.06min - 1826.82max) Points -1%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
1547 (1468.05min - 1546.97max) Points -16%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Workstation
  (166.2 - 301, n=30, last 2 years)
266 Points +16%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
254 Points +10%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
241 Points +5%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
238 Points +3%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
236 Points +3%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
232 Points +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
230 Points
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
  ()
230 Points 0%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
313 Seconds * -13%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
276 Seconds *
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
  ()
276 Seconds * -0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
261 Seconds * +5%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
254 Seconds * +8%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
249 Seconds * +10%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
227 Seconds * +18%
Average of class Workstation
  (100 - 295, n=30, last 2 years)
197 Seconds * +29%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Workstation
  (47244 - 130368, n=30, last 2 years)
72718 MIPS +54%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
57579 MIPS +22%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
53205 MIPS +13%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
50060 MIPS +6%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
50050 MIPS +6%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
47264 MIPS
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
  ()
47264 MIPS 0%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
44890 MIPS -5%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
6174 MIPS +18%
Average of class Workstation
  (4981 - 7337, n=30, last 2 years)
6100 MIPS +17%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
5773 MIPS +11%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
5755 MIPS +10%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
5727 MIPS +10%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
5640 MIPS +8%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
5222 MIPS
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
  ()
5222 MIPS 0%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Workstation
  (8050 - 19514, n=30, last 2 years)
13271 Points +59%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
10482 Points +26%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
9856 Points +18%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
  (8349 - 9766, n=2)
9058 Points +8%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
8349 Points
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
7286 Points -13%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average of class Workstation
  (1474 - 2095, n=30, last 2 years)
1864 Points +25%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
1777 Points +20%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
1702 Points +14%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
1632 Points +10%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
  (1487 - 1686, n=2)
1587 Points +7%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
1487 Points
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Workstation
  (12.7 - 34.3, n=30, last 2 years)
20 fps +49%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
17.1 fps +28%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
15 fps +12%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
14.5 fps +8%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
14.2 fps +6%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
13.4 fps
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
  ()
13.4 fps 0%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
12.6 fps -6%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
52.2 s * -127%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
49.3 s * -114%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
48.6 s * -111%
Average of class Workstation
  (36.5 - 95.2, n=30, last 2 years)
48.3 s * -110%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
48 s * -109%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
40.5 s * -76%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
23 s *
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
  ()
23 s * -0%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
0.57 sec *
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
  ()
0.57 sec * -0%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
0.551 sec * +3%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
0.544 sec * +5%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
0.543 sec * +5%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
0.533 sec * +6%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
0.4981 sec * +13%
Average of class Workstation
  (0.3825 - 0.54, n=30, last 2 years)
0.4482 sec * +21%
SPECviewperf 2020 / Solidworks (solidworks-05)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
199.4 fps
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
  ()
199.4 fps 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
176 fps -12%
Average of class Workstation
  (50.6 - 347, n=21, last 2 years)
171 fps -14%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
114.3 fps -43%
SPECviewperf 2020 / Siemens NX (snx-04)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
309.1 fps
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
  ()
309 fps 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
285.4 fps -8%
Average of class Workstation
  (22.3 - 554, n=29, last 2 years)
268 fps -13%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
175.1 fps -43%
SPECviewperf 2020 / Medical (medical-03)
Average of class Workstation
  (15.6 - 152, n=29, last 2 years)
62 fps +6%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
58.7 fps
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
  ()
58.7 fps 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
56.9 fps -3%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
33.98 fps -42%
SPECviewperf 2020 / Maya (maya-06)
Average of class Workstation
  (102 - 660, n=29, last 2 years)
302 fps +4%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
290 fps
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
  ()
290 fps 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
258.3 fps -11%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
196.6 fps -32%
SPECviewperf 2020 / Energy (energy-03)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
67.9 fps
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
  ()
67.9 fps 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
55 fps -19%
Average of class Workstation
  (2.78 - 109.7, n=29, last 2 years)
47.4 fps -30%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
29.44 fps -57%
SPECviewperf 2020 / Creo (creo-03)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
139.7 fps
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
  ()
139.7 fps 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
136 fps -3%
Average of class Workstation
  (45.9 - 169.5, n=29, last 2 years)
107.7 fps -23%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
91.5 fps -35%
SPECviewperf 2020 / CATIA (catia-06)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
98.8 fps
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
  ()
98.8 fps 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
93.6 fps -5%
Average of class Workstation
  (21 - 131.4, n=29, last 2 years)
76.2 fps -23%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
53.5 fps -46%
SPECviewperf 2020 / 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
123.1 fps
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
  ()
123.1 fps 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
120 fps -3%
Average of class Workstation
  (28.5 - 208, n=29, last 2 years)
92.6 fps -25%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
59.6 fps -52%
SPECviewperf 2020 / Solidworks (solidworks-05)
Average of class Workstation
  (29.9 - 160.1, n=8, last 2 years)
102.2 fps +10%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
92.5 fps
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
  ()
92.5 fps 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
72.8 fps -21%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
31.2 fps -66%
SPECviewperf 2020 / Siemens NX (snx-04)
Average of class Workstation
  (34.4 - 362, n=14, last 2 years)
202 fps +17%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
172.2 fps
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
  ()
172.2 fps 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
151.3 fps -12%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
99.9 fps -42%
SPECviewperf 2020 / Medical (medical-03)
Average of class Workstation
  (8.89 - 69.5, n=15, last 2 years)
32 fps +36%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
  ()
23.6 fps 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
23.58 fps
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
21.42 fps -9%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
10.84 fps -54%
SPECviewperf 2020 / Maya (maya-06)
Average of class Workstation
  (66.7 - 299, n=15, last 2 years)
173.4 fps +29%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
134.5 fps
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
  ()
134.5 fps 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
119.2 fps -11%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
79.3 fps -41%
SPECviewperf 2020 / Energy (energy-03)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
138.7 fps
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
  ()
138.7 fps 0%
Average of class Workstation
  (12.8 - 709, n=15, last 2 years)
86.9 fps -37%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
39.3 fps -72%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
9.4 fps -93%
SPECviewperf 2020 / Creo (creo-03)
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
89.8 fps +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
88.6 fps
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
  ()
88.6 fps 0%
Average of class Workstation
  (37.6 - 144.9, n=15, last 2 years)
86.4 fps -2%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
49.77 fps -44%
SPECviewperf 2020 / CATIA (catia-06)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
57.9 fps
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
  ()
57.9 fps 0%
Average of class Workstation
  (12.9 - 80.9, n=15, last 2 years)
53.1 fps -8%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
53 fps -8%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
22.34 fps -61%
SPECviewperf 2020 / 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
87.8 fps
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
  ()
87.8 fps 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
77 fps -12%
Average of class Workstation
  (17.1 - 114.5, n=15, last 2 years)
68.4 fps -22%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
30.46 fps -65%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1846 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
291 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
230 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4250 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
568 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1480 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
10862 Points
Help

系统性能

系统性能也是--根据预期--高于所有的对手。华硕ProArt Studiobook 16只能承认输给了桌面上的同类产品 申克XMG Ultra 17英特尔酷睿i9 11900K联想Thinkpad P1.我们无法确定该系统在日常使用中的任何问题,所有任务的执行都没有延迟。只有在打开和关闭程序时,主电源和电池操作之间的微小差异是明显的。

PCMark 10 / Score
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
7884 Points +13%
Average of class Workstation
  (5953 - 8587, n=30, last 2 years)
7294 Points +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7156 Points +3%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, W-11955M, 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
6951 Points
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  ()
6951 Points 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
6789 Points -2%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB
6751 Points -3%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
6676 Points -4%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
11050 Points +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10894 Points +7%
Average of class Workstation
  (9151 - 12197, n=30, last 2 years)
10627 Points +5%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10596 Points +4%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, W-11955M, 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
10145 Points
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  ()
10145 Points 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
10037 Points -1%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB
9915 Points -2%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
9827 Points +10%
Average of class Workstation
  (7846 - 10820, n=30, last 2 years)
9466 Points +6%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9005 Points 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, W-11955M, 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
8971 Points
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  ()
8971 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8913 Points -1%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
8491 Points -5%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB
8461 Points -6%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
12250 Points +22%
Average of class Workstation
  (7417 - 15093, n=30, last 2 years)
10578 Points +6%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10241 Points +2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, W-11955M, 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
10015 Points
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  ()
10015 Points 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
9967 Points 0%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB
9952 Points -1%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8463 Points -15%
PCMark 10 Score
6951 points
Help

DPC延迟

由于我们测试设备的预期用途包括处理音频和视频文件,DPC延迟可能会导致问题。测试表明需要在延迟方面进行优化,我们的设备本身在Youtube视频测试中也有掉帧。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB
1508 μs * -1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, W-11955M, 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
1493 μs *
Dell Precision 5000 5560
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
759 μs * +49%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
578 μs * +61%

* ... smaller is better

储存

预生产设备理论上支持2x个PCIe 4.0的M.2 NVMe SSD,所以为什么华硕在这里的RAID 0配置中安装两个PCIe 3.0的SSD是值得怀疑的。在AS SSD基准测试和Crystal DiskMark中,这些表现相当平庸,甚至是单块PCIe 3.0的SSD在 惠普Zbook Fury在一些基准测试部分落后于我们的配置。在这里,我们也看到了优化的需要。华硕可以依靠PCIe 4.0存储单元或者应该优化驱动程序。

Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Average 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
38%
174%
44%
110%
0%
Write 4K
105.6
96.3
-9%
240
127%
110.5
5%
172.4
63%
105.6 ?()
0%
Read 4K
50.2
51.5
3%
87.8
75%
51.8
3%
78.8
57%
50.2 ?()
0%
Write Seq
445.6
1942
336%
4281
861%
2071
365%
2991
571%
446 ?()
0%
Read Seq
753
2504
233%
4228
461%
2505
233%
3351
345%
753 ?()
0%
Write 4K Q32T1
2713
346.6
-87%
696
-74%
429.8
-84%
459.2
-83%
2713 ?()
0%
Read 4K Q32T1
2399
408
-83%
778
-68%
418.3
-83%
484.3
-80%
2399 ?()
0%
Write Seq Q32T1
5378
3019
-44%
5195
-3%
3060
-43%
4761
-11%
5378 ?()
0%
Read Seq Q32T1
6189
3514
-43%
7099
15%
3539
-43%
7071
14%
6189 ?()
0%
AS SSD
-21%
80%
14%
35%
85%
0%
Seq Read
4317
2937
-32%
5010
16%
2953
-32%
5169
20%
4526
5%
4317 ?()
0%
Seq Write
2037
1688
-17%
3974
95%
1691
-17%
1986
-3%
3988
96%
2037 ?()
0%
4K Read
48.97
44.27
-10%
51.9
6%
43.98
-10%
78
59%
82.9
69%
49 ?()
0%
4K Write
112.4
105.8
-6%
156.8
40%
105.4
-6%
214.6
91%
207.5
85%
112.4 ?()
0%
4K-64 Read
1253
873
-30%
2611
108%
1065
-15%
1232
-2%
2751
120%
1253 ?()
0%
4K-64 Write
1473
1996
36%
3859
162%
1957
33%
2719
85%
3270
122%
1473 ?()
0%
Access Time Read *
0.045
0.048
-7%
0.072
-60%
0.04
11%
0.024
47%
0.024
47%
0.045 ?()
-0%
Access Time Write *
0.083
0.107
-29%
0.026
69%
0.105
-27%
0.059
29%
0.021
75%
0.083 ?()
-0%
Score Read
1765
1211
-31%
3164
79%
1404
-20%
1827
4%
3287
86%
1765 ?()
0%
Score Write
1722
2271
32%
4414
156%
2232
30%
3133
82%
3876
125%
1722 ?()
0%
Score Total
4256
4046
-5%
9134
115%
4297
1%
5753
35%
8821
107%
4256 ?()
0%
Copy ISO MB/s
2441
901
-63%
3424
40%
2474
1%
3201
31%
2441 ?()
0%
Copy Program MB/s
395.7
118.7
-70%
1091
176%
1074
171%
415.8
5%
396 ?()
0%
Copy Game MB/s
1115
372
-67%
2365
112%
1929
73%
1212
9%
1115 ?()
0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
9% / 0%
127% / 114%
29% / 25%
73% / 62%
85% / 85%
0% / 0%

* ... smaller is better

2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6189 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5378 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 2399 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 2713 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 753 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 445.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 50.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 105.6 MB/s

Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

03156309451260157518902205252028353150346537804095441047255040535556705985Tooltip
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2: Ø5970 (2469.7-6250.43)

图形卡

由于安装了冷却系统和高达110瓦的TDP,所以 RTX A5000在纯图形性能方面是令人信服的,因此比惠普ZBook Fury领先15%至20%。 惠普ZBook Fury在合成基准测试中领先惠普ZBook Fury。

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11900K
30650 Points +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11900H
28939 Points +6%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
28687 Points +5%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
27271 Points
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (23579 - 29610, n=3)
26820 Points -2%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
23579 Points -14%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
21399 Points -22%
Average of class Workstation
  (6121 - 45600, n=31, last 2 years)
20659 Points -24%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11900K
13144 Points +28%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
12055 Points +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11900H
11424 Points +11%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
10307 Points
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (8242 - 11580, n=3)
10043 Points -3%
Average of class Workstation
  (1997 - 19741, n=31, last 2 years)
8309 Points -19%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
8242 Points -20%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
7909 Points -23%
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11900K
15128 Points +13%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
13435 Points
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  ()
13435 Points 0%
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11900K
7967 Points +17%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
7754 Points +13%
Average of class Workstation
  (4505 - 10115, n=10, last 2 years)
7193 Points +5%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
6833 Points
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (5816 - 6833, n=2)
6325 Points -7%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
5816 Points -15%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
5438 Points -20%
3DMark Fire Strike Score
22819 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
12825 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
10157 points
Help

游戏性能

虽然我们的预生产设备没有为游戏进行优化,但它仍然可以在QHD下处理大多数标题。然而,该显示器被限制在60赫兹。在竞争对手中,只有真正的游戏强者--如Schenker XMG Ultra--能明显超过我们的评测样品。总体而言,华硕ProArt Studiobook Pro 16的游戏性能处于RTX 3080的较低水平。

正如预期的那样,游戏性能在电池电量上非常有限。

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
242 (65.9min, 93.8P0.1, 168P1 - 419max) fps +95%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
174 (141min) fps +40%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
154.2 (135min - 171max) fps +24%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (124 - 179, n=3)
150.8 fps +22%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
149.5 (141min - 165max) fps +21%
Average of class Workstation
  (34.9 - 298, n=22, last 2 years)
125.3 fps +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
124 fps
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
92.4 (86min - 97max) fps -25%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
123 (64.1min, 75.8P0.1, 90.7P1 - 241max) fps +37%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
93.8 (75min) fps +4%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (81.7 - 98.3, n=3)
90 fps 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
89.9 (87min, 88P1 - 93max) fps
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
81.7 (78min - 87max) fps -9%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
81.5 (72min - 87max) fps -9%
Average of class Workstation
  (23.3 - 156.5, n=23, last 2 years)
71.2 fps -21%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
50 (48min - 53max) fps -44%
GTA V
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
164 (5.22min, 100P1 - 283max) fps +4%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
158 (3.82min, 90.9P1 - 384max) fps
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (131 - 161, n=3)
150 fps -5%
Average of class Workstation
  (47.6 - 179.7, n=27, last 2 years)
139.8 fps -12%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
131 (11.7min, 35.7P1 - 238max) fps -17%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
112 (15.5min, 55.6P1 - 225max) fps -29%
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
98.5 (17.3min, 62.5P1 - 209max) fps +15%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
85.8 (21.2min, 52.6P1 - 178max) fps
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (76.1 - 94.6, n=3)
85.5 fps 0%
Average of class Workstation
  (18.3 - 141.6, n=27, last 2 years)
82.7 fps -4%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
76.1 (5.43min, 28.6P1 - 148max) fps -11%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
57.8 (7.07min, 23.3P1 - 124max) fps -33%
2560x1440 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
82.3 (16.3min, 58.8P1 - 145max) fps 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
82.2 (16min, 55.6P1 - 163max) fps
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (70.4 - 84.3, n=3)
79 fps -4%
Average of class Workstation
  (19.1 - 124.3, n=22, last 2 years)
77.1 fps -6%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
70.4 (4.81min, 27.8P1 - 144max) fps -14%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
42.9 (5.15min, 17.9P1 - 97.1max) fps -48%
3840x2160 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
44.4 (10.1min, 30.3P1 - 95.9max) fps
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (42.1 - 44.4, n=2)
43.3 fps -2%
Average of class Workstation
  (8.83 - 83.5, n=10, last 2 years)
42.2 fps -5%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
42.1 (7.59min, 25.6P1 - 95.2max) fps -5%
3840x2160 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:FX AF:8x
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
86.5 (25.9min, 62.5P1 - 195max) fps +13%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (75.5 - 92.5, n=3)
81.4 fps +7%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
76.3 (29.3min, 47.6P1 - 184max) fps
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
75.5 (13.9min, 28.6P1 - 195max) fps -1%
Average of class Workstation
  (20.7 - 120.3, n=9, last 2 years)
72.1 fps -6%
Dota 2 Reborn
3840x2160 ultra (3/3) best looking
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
118 (97.8min) fps
Average of class Workstation
  (31.2 - 170.9, n=12, last 2 years)
114.7 fps -3%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
110 (8.5min) fps -7%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (95 - 118, n=2)
106.5 fps -10%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
95 (57.1min) fps -19%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
93.1 (67.6min) fps -21%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
62.9 (57.3min) fps -47%
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
156 (137.1min) fps +33%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
131 (113.6min) fps +12%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
131 (112.8min) fps +12%
Average of class Workstation
  (57.8 - 178.4, n=31, last 2 years)
127.4 fps +9%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (117 - 131, n=2)
124 fps +6%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
119 (102min) fps +2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
117 (97min) fps
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
116.3 (90.8min) fps -1%
1920x1080 high (2/3)
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
161 (140.5min) fps +30%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
146 (120.5min) fps +18%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
140 (121.3min) fps +13%
Average of class Workstation
  (67.4 - 199.8, n=31, last 2 years)
137.5 fps +11%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
135.8 (95.1min) fps +10%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (124 - 140, n=2)
132 fps +6%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
130 (112.5min) fps +5%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
124 (103.4min) fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
3840x2160 High Quality
Average of class Workstation
  (11.2 - 86.1, n=11, last 2 years)
48 fps +17%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
42.9 (27min) fps +5%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (35.4 - 51.1, n=3)
42.5 fps +4%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
41 fps
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
36.2 fps -12%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
35.4 fps -14%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
19.3 fps -53%
2560x1440 High Quality
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (62.6 - 83.6, n=3)
72.3 fps +2%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
71.2 (44min) fps +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
70.6 fps
Average of class Workstation
  (17.7 - 147.8, n=24, last 2 years)
69.2 fps -2%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
62.6 fps -11%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
61.3 fps -13%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
34.4 fps -51%
1920x1080 High Quality
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (81.1 - 108, n=3)
93.6 fps +2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
91.8 fps
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
88 (56min) fps -4%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
81.1 fps -12%
Average of class Workstation
  (21.2 - 174.6, n=31, last 2 years)
80.1 fps -13%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
78.5 fps -14%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
46.6 fps -49%
X-Plane 11.11
3840x2160 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Workstation
  (19.2 - 114.8, n=12, last 2 years)
82.3 fps +58%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
63.2 fps +22%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (48.6 - 65.3, n=3)
55.3 fps +6%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
54.4 fps +5%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
52 fps
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
48.6 fps -7%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
45.3 fps -13%
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
113 fps +38%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
89.2 fps +9%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
83.5 fps +2%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (76.5 - 90.5, n=3)
82.9 fps +2%
Average of class Workstation
  (27.7 - 139.7, n=32, last 2 years)
82.4 fps +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
81.6 fps
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
76.5 fps -6%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
75.1 fps -8%
Far Cry 5
3840x2160 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Workstation
  (12 - 72, n=5, last 2 years)
57.4 fps +59%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
52 (47min) fps +44%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
44 (39min - 55max) fps +22%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
44 (39min - 55max) fps +22%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (36 - 50, n=3)
43.3 fps +20%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
36 fps
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Workstation
  (27 - 129, n=13, last 2 years)
91.2 fps +57%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
90 (80min) fps +55%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
81 (71min - 99max) fps +40%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
79 (57min - 93max) fps +36%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (58 - 92, n=3)
76.3 fps +32%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
58 fps
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
49 (41min - 61max) fps -16%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
146 (112min - 188max) fps +143%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
114 (78min) fps +90%
Average of class Workstation
  (33 - 149, n=22, last 2 years)
90.8 fps +51%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
89 (48min - 121max) fps +48%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
85 (65min - 122max) fps +42%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (60 - 103, n=3)
82.7 fps +38%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
69 (55min - 87max) fps +15%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
60 fps
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
155 (120min - 196max) fps +150%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
125 (93min) fps +102%
Average of class Workstation
  (35 - 138, n=21, last 2 years)
93.5 fps +51%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
93 (66min - 118max) fps +50%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
90 (38min - 121max) fps +45%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (62 - 113, n=3)
88.3 fps +42%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
77 (64min - 94max) fps +24%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
62 fps
Strange Brigade
2560x1440 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
129 (70.7min, 98.8P1 - 205max) fps
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (108 - 146, n=3)
127.7 fps -1%
Average of class Workstation
  (31.7 - 281, n=18, last 2 years)
124.7 fps -3%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
123 (36.9min, 94.8P1 - 233max) fps -5%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
108 (32.7min, 86P1 - 365max) fps -16%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
60.4 (46.4min, 48.3P1 - 84.1max) fps -53%
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (147 - 191, n=3)
166 fps +4%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
165 (97.3min, 123P1 - 287max) fps +3%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
160 (89.3min, 114P1 - 321max) fps
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
147 (37.3min, 108P1 - 408max) fps -8%
Average of class Workstation
  (34.1 - 360, n=27, last 2 years)
142.2 fps -11%
1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
192 (89.6min, 141P1 - 323max) fps
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (165 - 213, n=3)
190 fps -1%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
185 (31.9min, 133P1 - 319max) fps -4%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
165 (35.9min, 121P1 - 489max) fps -14%
Average of class Workstation
  (39.9 - 379, n=27, last 2 years)
159.3 fps -17%
Metro Exodus
3840x2160 Ultra Quality AF:16x
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
28.5 (17.5min - 59.2max) fps +19%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (24 - 28.5, n=2)
26.3 fps +10%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
24 fps
2560x1440 Ultra Quality AF:16x
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
46.3 (25min - 106max) fps +13%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (41 - 46.3, n=2)
43.7 fps +7%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
41 fps
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
27 (15.6min - 52.5max) fps -34%
1920x1080 Ultra Quality AF:16x
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
59.8 (29.2min - 130.7max) fps +9%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (55 - 59.8, n=2)
57.4 fps +4%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
55 fps
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
34.9 (18.4min - 70max) fps -37%
1920x1080 High Quality AF:16x
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
74.5 (33.2min - 147.8max) fps +8%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (69 - 74.5, n=2)
71.8 fps +4%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
69 fps
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
42.3 (22.3min - 61.2max) fps -39%
F1 2020
3840x2160 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
63.1 (54min - 71max) fps
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  ()
63.1 fps 0%
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
133 (113min - 150max) fps
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  ()
133 fps 0%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
164 (142min - 183max) fps
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  ()
164 fps 0%
F1 2021
3840x2160 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
48.7 (41min, 40P1 - 53max) fps
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
47 (40min) fps -3%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (38 - 53.6, n=3)
46.8 fps -4%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
38 (32min - 44max) fps -22%
Average of class Workstation
  (last 2 years)
23.9 fps -51%
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
84 (72min) fps +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
82.8 (66min, 63P1 - 89max) fps
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (59 - 88.2, n=3)
76.7 fps -7%
Average of class Workstation
  (44.4 - 74.9, n=2, last 2 years)
59.7 fps -28%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
59 (22min - 79max) fps -29%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
24 (20min - 28max) fps -71%
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
110 (92min) fps +6%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
104 (86min, 78P1 - 112max) fps
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (85 - 109, n=3)
99.3 fps -5%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
85 (27min - 116max) fps -18%
Average of class Workstation
  (62.1 - 99.2, n=3, last 2 years)
74.7 fps -28%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
37 (32min - 43max) fps -64%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
172 (149min) fps +8%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
159 (137min, 100P1 - 177max) fps
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (122 - 161, n=3)
147.3 fps -7%
Average of class Workstation
  (124.4 - 186.6, n=3, last 2 years)
146.6 fps -8%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
122 (51min - 164max) fps -23%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
104 (91min - 116max) fps -35%
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0
3840x2160 Ultra Preset
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (16.7 - 25, n=2)
20.9 fps +25%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
16.7 fps
2560x1440 Ultra Preset
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (37.1 - 51, n=2)
44.1 fps +19%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
37.1 fps
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
84.3 (20.2min, 67.5P0.1, 72.1P1 - 115max) fps +44%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (58.6 - 78, n=2)
68.3 fps +17%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
58.6 fps
1920x1080 High Preset
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
96.1 (20.2min, 73.4P0.1, 80.2P1 - 131max) fps +41%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (68.1 - 90, n=2)
79.1 fps +16%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
68.1 fps

在我们用TheWitcher 3 (FHD/Ultra)进行的60分钟测试中,性能在整个测试中保持相对稳定。

Witcher 3 FPS Diagramm

051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 W-11955M, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU: Ø89.9 (87-93)
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
GTA V (2015) 180 175 158 85.8 82.2 76.3
The Witcher 3 (2015) 321 217.9 124 89.9 54.8
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 144 136 124 117 118
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 184 123 91.8 70.6 41
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 117 102 81.6 52
Far Cry 5 (2018) 76 69 62 60 58 36
Strange Brigade (2018) 419 231 192 160 129
Metro Exodus (2019) 148 126 69 55 41 24
F1 2020 (2020) 253 181 164 133 63.1
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 (2020) 114.6 83.1 68.1 58.6 37.1 16.7
F1 2021 (2021) 269 171 159 104 82.8 48.7

排放。高性能需要付出代价

噪声排放

即使在空闲状态下,风扇也有自己的发言权,几乎没有静止过。在负载情况下,风扇的声音清晰可闻,并能适应所需的性能。在ProArt Creator Hub中可以对风扇速度进行各种设置。用户可以选择三种模式。标准模式、性能模式和全风扇速度。在测试中,事实证明,全风扇速度下的优势是非常微弱的。

Noise Level

Idle
26 / 26 / 26.5 dB(A)
Load
42 / 43 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 26 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2023.123.125.429.323.12531.330.930.633.931.33132.339.83737.332.34026.73431.730.826.7502827.931.731.5286326.323.126.825.326.3801718.517.320.31710015.119.118.319.115.112516.919.719.920.216.916015.822.520.717.815.820015.223.323.217.115.225019.52320.815.919.531516.125.723.715.616.140015.826.625.312.515.85001427.223.612.21463014.528.725.411.414.580013.830.826.311.313.810001431.727.311.714125014.432.6281214.4160014.330.425.611.814.3200014.531.926.812.714.5250014.531.327.613.314.5315015.330.82713.615.3400014.431.627.813.414.450001430.327.413.514630013.532.52713.513.5800013.830.325.113.713.81000014.128.325.113.914.1125001431.630.913.6141600013.823.62414.213.8SPL26.54338.925.226.5N0.84.33.10.60.8median 14.4median 30.3median 25.4median 13.5median 14.4Delta13.621.8139.151.241.538.346.439.128.939.132.93037.228.928.1352929.33528.125.535.526.231.730.525.524.232.126.133.228.124.223.22927.128.127.723.224.730.529.224.228.924.721.726.824.221.925.121.719.124.624.421.322.619.116.624.824.322.418.416.616.227.126.824.617.316.216.529.128.524.616.716.517.730.830.726.617.717.715.132.73327.115.815.113.531.531.525.213.713.512.130.53124.811.912.110.130.130.223.911.210.110.131.731.825.910.510.11033.733.52810.21010.43433.928.410.310.410.834.434.628.310.710.810.734.234.227.410.510.710.931.93224.81110.911.3313124.911.311.311.431.531.42411.911.411.53130.820.711.511.511.9262617.211.611.911.920.921.315.711.711.912.41818.714.511.512.411.614.11714.510.811.623.844.144.137.824.123.80.54.74.72.70.60.5median 11.9median 30.8median 30.8median 24.6median 11.6median 11.92.33.53.82.93.22.3hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2HP ZBook Fury 15 G8

温度

大量的电力会产生大量的废热。这也是我们的预生产样品的情况,因为该设备从未真正保持冷却。随着CPU的大量负载,温度很快超过100℃。另一方面,GPU做得更好一些,只达到80℃多一点。表面温度也相应适中。


Max. Load
 34.3 °C45.7 °C33.9 °C 
 33 °C43.5 °C30.9 °C 
 32.9 °C35.2 °C30.9 °C 
Maximum: 45.7 °C
Average: 35.6 °C
44.5 °C48.3 °C37.7 °C
42.4 °C40.7 °C34.2 °C
33.3 °C35.2 °C33.5 °C
Maximum: 48.3 °C
Average: 38.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42 °C | Room Temperature 22.3 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Workstation.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.7 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.3 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 41.3 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.2 °C / 95.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (-7.4 °C / -13.4 F).
闲置的顶部
闲置的顶部
闲置底部
闲置底部
压力测试顶部
压力测试顶部
压力测试底部
压力测试底部

发言人

ProArt Studiobook Pro 16的音频质量非常好,非常平衡。在较低和较高的音量下,良好、干净和饱满的声音以及丰富的低音都特别突出。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.728.530.7253732.7373139.336.939.34034.235.234.25032.23332.26329.22729.2802921.62910038.618.738.612542.519.142.516043.816.343.820044.615.744.62505413.95431560.814.460.840064.911.864.950064.411.364.463065.511.265.580064.210.964.2100059.111.559.1125063.212.163.216006611.966200064.31364.3250064.213.564.2315065.813.665.8400064.613.364.650006713.367630071.613.671.6800073.713.773.7100007914791250080.813.680.81600076.312.376.3SPL82.425.182.4N48.60.648.6median 64.4median 13.5median 64.4Delta41.8440.139.140.131.828.931.827.728.127.72825.52827.424.227.423.723.223.733.124.733.140.621.740.645.619.145.655.816.655.858.416.258.460.216.560.259.917.759.958.615.158.661.113.561.164.512.164.567.810.167.868.510.168.571.51071.568.810.468.865.710.865.767.310.767.36410.9647111.37169.511.469.566.811.566.865.311.965.363.711.963.763.312.463.356.611.656.679.823.879.847.70.547.7median 64median 11.9median 645.32.35.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理。Studiobook的电池运行时间不长

能源消耗

最低12.4瓦,最高25瓦的空闲功耗略高于 惠普ZBook Fury.

电源的大小超过240瓦,但最大能耗只有134瓦。这一点在TheWitcher 3 上变得更加明显,其能耗仍为132瓦。由于这是一个预生产样品,我们假设最大能耗仍将被调整,以有利于性能。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.5 / 2.4 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 12.4 / 16.5 / 25 Watt
Load midlight 132 / 134 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
W-11955M, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0), OLED, 3840x2400, 16"
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
i9-11950H, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6"
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
i9-11950H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6"
Dell Precision 5000 5560
i7-11850H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 3840x2400, 15.6"
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00
i7-11850H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS LED, 3840x2400, 16"
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
i9-11900K, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
 
Average of class Workstation
 
Power Consumption
-2%
-8%
22%
3%
-201%
-5%
17%
Idle Minimum *
12.4
8.3
33%
11
11%
6.2
50%
8.1
35%
62
-400%
10.4 ?(8.3 - 12.4, n=3)
16%
Idle Average *
16.5
19.9
-21%
18.8
-14%
13.9
16%
20.2
-22%
64
-288%
18.3 ?(16.5 - 19.9, n=3)
-11%
Idle Maximum *
25
21.8
13%
31.7
-27%
23.8
5%
21.9
12%
69
-176%
22.3 ?(20 - 25, n=3)
11%
Load Average *
132
110.9
16%
105.2
20%
95.7
27%
88.2
33%
183
-39%
Witcher 3 ultra *
132
165
-25%
148
-12%
87
34%
149
-13%
297
-125%
Load Maximum *
134
171.8
-28%
171.8
-28%
132.6
1%
170.6
-27%
368
-175%
195.8 ?(134 - 282, n=3)
-46%

* ... smaller is better

Energy consumption during The Witcher 3 / stress test

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170Tooltip
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø132.1 (130-139)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø138.4 (109-179)

电池寿命

我们的预生产设备的电池运行时间参差不齐,落后于整个竞争对手。在我们的标准化WLAN测试中,测试设备在300分钟后就耗尽了气力。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Surfing
0h 00min
Witcher 3 ultra 150cd
1h 34min
WiFi Websurfing
5h 01min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
4h 05min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
1h 46min
Load (maximum brightness)
0h 00min
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
W-11955M, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
i9-11950H, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, 94 Wh
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
i9-11950H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh
Dell Precision 5000 5560
i7-11850H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, 86 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00
i7-11850H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Average of class Workstation
 
Battery Runtime
23%
23%
26%
172%
300%
H.264
106
429
305%
WiFi v1.3
301
370
23%
369
23%
380
26%
417
39%
Witcher 3 ultra
94
Load
106
110
74
Reader / Idle
774
722

判决书

华硕ProArt Studiobook Pro 16 OLED W7600h。测试装置由德国华硕公司提供
华硕ProArt Studiobook Pro 16 OLED W7600h。测试装置由德国华硕公司提供

华硕ProArt Studiobook Pro 16给人的第一印象是相当坚实。轻巧而优雅的外壳以其镁合金材质而令人信服。这里的一个特殊功能是嵌入式华硕拨号控制器,它允许用户在图像和视频编辑程序中非常精确地执行一些特殊功能。键盘不仅能以良好的压力点保持自己的状态,而且还能以普遍提供的舒适打字。触摸板提供了良好的滑行性能,并有足够的表面,即使它不是太大。端口的位置很好,符合现代要求。

预产样品的第一次性能测试留下了一些问题的答案,但它们给了我们一个预期性能的清晰画面。图形性能与低TDP RTX 3080相当。系统性能持续良好,在日常使用中没有给我们任何批评的理由。尽管如此,我们认为,在产品发布之前,华硕仍有一些东西需要优化。最大功耗约为134瓦,这对240瓦的电源来说并不公平,令人震惊。

华硕ProArt Studiobook Pro 16在图像质量和色彩空间覆盖方面为移动工作站设立了新标准。尤其令人印象深刻的是高质量和轻量级的外壳、16:10格式的4K OLED HDR面板以及华硕表盘控制器等功能。

另一方面,OLED显示屏是一流的,拥有各种认证和16:10格式。非常好的工厂校准在这里也很突出,使这个面板适用于专业的图片和视频编辑。华硕ProArt Studiobook Pro 16的音频质量也令人惊讶:它非常好,以干净的声音和丰富的低音而引人注目。在我们的预生产单元中,风扇的特性是相当冲动的:风扇几乎没有静止过,而是根据所需的性能进行适应性的操作。然而,它们是清晰可闻的,并产生较高的背景噪音,但对于设备的性能和尺寸来说是可以接受的。

价格和可用性

由于它是一个系列前的设备,我们不给这个测试的评级。我们想指出的是,很多规格仍然可以由制造商调整,直到该系列的发布。预计交货日期和价格还不知道。

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华硕ProArt StudioBook Pro 16 W7600笔记本电脑在审查:强大而轻便的工作站
Patrick Schüdzig, 2021-12- 3 (Update: 2021-12- 3)