Notebookcheck Logo

戴尔Precision 5560工作站回顾。Quadro RTX A2000的提升

一个精致的Precision 5550。

去年的Precision 5550在性能和设计方面比Precision 5540有了巨大的飞跃。今年的Precision 5560是一个更小的进步，但一路走来并非没有一些惊喜。
Business Workstation Laptop / Notebook XPS

戴尔Precision 5560是去年的Precision 5550的内部更新。这两款机型都是基于新的 XPS 15 9500/9510机箱，因此所有型号都带有类似的16:10面板和其他物理特征。因此，我们建议查看我们对 Precision 5550, XPS 15 9500, 或 XPS 15 9510因为我们的许多评论在这里仍然适用于Precision 5560。

与Precision 5550相比，Precision 5560配备了第11代Tiger Lake-H CPU和Nvidia Ampere GPU，分别取代旧的第10代Comet Lake-H CPU和Turing GPU。SKU的范围从2000美元的基本酷睿i5-11500H与Quadro T1200显卡、1200p显示屏和8GB内存，到4000美元以上的i9-11950H或Xeon W-11955M vPro CPU与Quadro RTX A2000显卡、2400p触摸屏和64GB ECC内存。我们的具体测试装置是一个中档配置，零售价略高于3000美元。

这一领域的竞争对手包括其他15.6英寸移动工作站，如HP ZBook Studio 15 G8,华硕ProArt StudioBook Pro 15,联想ThinkPad P15 Gen 2,微星WS66, 或Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 。我们的机型有一个17英寸的版本，叫做Precision 5750 ，基于XPS 17 。

更多戴尔的评论。

Dell Precision 5000 5560 (Precision 5000 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-11850H 8 x 2.5 - 4.8 GHz, 93 W PL2 / Short Burst, 45 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU - 4 GB VRAM, Core: 1450 MHz, RAM: 1200 MHz, 45 W TDP, GDDR6, 472.12, Optimus
Memory
32 GB 
, DDR4-3200, 22-22-22-52, Dual-Channel
Display
15.60 inch 16:10, 3840 x 2400 pixel 290 PPI, 10-point capacitive, Sharp LQ156R1, IPS, SHP1516, Dell P/N: JNJY9, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel WM590 (Tiger Lake PCH-H)
Storage
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, 2048 GB 
Soundcard
Intel Tiger Lake PCH-H - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 3 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo, Card Reader: SD, Brightness Sensor
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 18 x 344.72 x 230.14
Battery
86 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 2.5 W x2 subwoofers, 1.5 W x2 tweeters, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, USB-C to USB-A and HDMI adapter, Dell Command, Optimizer, Power Manager, PremierColor, Digital Delivery, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
2.006 kg, Power Supply: 481 g
Price
3000 USD
Links
Dell homepage
Dell notebook section
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

potential competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
88.3 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2021
Dell Precision 5000 5560
i7-11850H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU		2 kg18 mm15.60"3840x2400
Modellvarianten USD 559.90
87.2 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2021
Lenovo ThinkPad P15 G2-20YQ001JGE
i7-11800H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU		2.9 kg31.5 mm15.60"1920x1080
Modellvarianten USD 559.90
87.8 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2021
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
i9-11950H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU		1.9 kg18 mm15.60"3840x2160
Modellvarianten USD 559.90
83.1 %
v7 (old)
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
i7-9750H, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q		2 kg18.9 mm15.60"3840x2160
Modellvarianten USD 559.90
87.8 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2020
Dell Precision 7550
W-10885M, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q		2.8 kg27.36 mm15.60"3840x2160
Modellvarianten USD 559.90
86.3 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2020
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
i7-10875H, Quadro T2000 Max-Q		2 kg18 mm15.60"3840x2400
Modellvarianten USD 559.90
87 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2020
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
i7-10875H, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q		2.2 kg13.98 mm15.60"3840x2160
Modellvarianten USD 559.90

案例--专业XPS

机箱和尺寸与XPS 15 9500或9510相同，为18 x 344.72 x 230.14毫米。然而，戴尔官方产品页面声称，Precision 5560的最厚处为11.64毫米，要薄很多，这绝对是错误的。我们怀疑戴尔已经改变了他们测量厚度的方式，这可能会对消费者产生很大的误导。 我们观察到相同的XPS 13 7390二合一和XPS 13 9310二合一之间也有

类似的厚度差异。 </span> 像往常一样。与典型的XPS 15相比，镁合金外盖的灰色调略深，以帮助从视觉上识别Precision 55x0系列与XPS 15系列。
❌
375.4 mm 252.3 mm 31.5 mm 2.9 kg360 mm 242 mm 27.36 mm 2.8 kg360 mm 252 mm 18.9 mm 2 kg354 mm 235 mm 18 mm 1.9 kg355 mm 235 mm 13.98 mm 2.2 kg344.72 mm 230.14 mm 18 mm 2 kg344.72 mm 230.14 mm 18 mm 2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性 - Thunderbolt 4准备就绪

端口选项只包括USB-C，所以要准备好到处都有适配器。所有三个USB-C端口都支持DisplayPort和Power Delivery，但只有左边的两个USB-C端口支持Thunderbolt设备。特别是这两个端口已经从Precision 5550的Thunderbolt 3升级到Precision 5560的Thunderbolt 4。

前面。没有连接
前面。没有连接
右边。USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C w/ Power Delivery and DisplayPort，SD读卡器，3.5毫米组合音频
右边。USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C w/ Power Delivery and DisplayPort，SD读卡器，3.5毫米组合音频
后方。没有连接
后方。没有连接
左边：贵族锁，2个USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C端口，带雷电4，电力传输，和显示端口
左边：贵族锁，2个USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C端口，带雷电4，电力传输，和显示端口

SD卡阅读器

在我们的UHS-II测试卡上，传输速度非常快，接近200MB/s。插槽不是弹簧式的，所以SD卡会在边缘突出来。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo ThinkPad P15 G2-20YQ001JGE
  (AV Pro V60)
200 MB/s +2%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
  (AV Pro V60)
196.9 MB/s
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
193.1 MB/s -2%
Dell Precision 7550
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
188.2 MB/s -4%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
77.3 MB/s -61%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
  (AV Pro V60)
73.8 MB/s -63%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo ThinkPad P15 G2-20YQ001JGE
  (AV Pro V60)
207 MB/s +4%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
  (AV Pro V60)
198.4 MB/s
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
196.7 MB/s -1%
Dell Precision 7550
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
196.4 MB/s -1%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
  (AV Pro V60)
88.6 MB/s -55%

沟通

英特尔AX201 Wi-Fi 6无线局域网模块是焊接的，用户不能升级。当与我们的Netgear RAX200测试路由器配对时，我们经历了稳定的传输速率和性能。
英特尔AX201 Wi-Fi 6无线局域网模块是焊接的，用户不能升级。当与我们的Netgear RAX200测试路由器配对时，我们经历了稳定的传输速率和性能。
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1595 (1327min - 1824max) MBit/s +63%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1419 (1169min - 1609max) MBit/s +45%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15 G2-20YQ001JGE
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1382 (746min - 1521max) MBit/s +41%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1346 (1260min - 1382max) MBit/s +37%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1037 (976min - 1071max) MBit/s +6%
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1011 (507min - 1065max) MBit/s +3%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
981 (864min - 1044max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Lenovo ThinkPad P15 G2-20YQ001JGE
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1529 (1364min - 1645max) MBit/s +11%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1404 (717min - 1487max) MBit/s +2%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1382 (1340min - 1446max) MBit/s
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1368 (735min - 1454max) MBit/s -1%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1363 (1311min - 1453max) MBit/s -1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1353 (1259min - 1416max) MBit/s -2%
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1316 (579min - 1479max) MBit/s -5%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400Tooltip
Dell Precision 5000 5560; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1381 (1340-1446)
Dell Precision 5000 5560; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø981 (864-1044)

网络摄像头--仍然没有隐私遮板

ColorChecker
10.1 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
17 ∆E
21.6 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Dell Precision 5000 5560: 11.99 ∆E min: 4.15 - max: 21.62 ∆E

维护

与旧的Precision 5540设计相比，底部面板更难拆除。内部布局在其他方面与Precision 5550基本相同。

Precision 5560内部结构
Precision 5560内部结构
Precision 5540进行比较
Precision 5540进行比较

配件和保修

零售包装盒包括一个方便的USB-C转全尺寸USB-A和HDMI适配器，就像XPS 15一样。

令人失望的是，基本保修期只有一年，而不是许多其他移动工作站的两年或三年。用户将不得不升级到更高端的Precision 7000系列，以获得更长的基本保修。

输入设备

与Precision 5540相比，背光键更大、更清晰，但行程较浅，更像超极本。
与Precision 5540相比，背光键更大、更清晰，但行程较浅，更像超极本。
非常大的~15.1 x 9厘米的点击板使多点触摸输入更容易。用户将需要升级到Precision 7000系列，以获得实际的鼠标按钮和TrackPoint。
非常大的~15.1 x 9厘米的点击板使多点触摸输入更容易。用户将需要升级到Precision 7000系列，以获得实际的鼠标按钮和TrackPoint。

显示

戴尔继续在其所有16:10的XPS 15和Precision 5550/5560 4K SKU上使用相同的夏普LQ156R1 IPS触摸屏，这很好，因为这仍然是一个高端面板，具有完整的AdobeRGB覆盖，高>1000:1的对比度，以及明亮的~500 nit背光。因此，最新的XPS 15和Precision 55x0型号之间的观看体验是一致的。就像XPS 15一样，一些SKU上有一个较小的哑光1200p非触摸显示屏，但OLED在Precision 5560上却被奇怪地省略了。

缓慢的黑白和灰白响应时间仍然是主要的缺点，这意味着重影非常明显，特别是与OLED相比。对于大多数CAD类型的应用，这不会是一个巨大的问题。

2400p SKU的边缘到边缘的玻璃保护面板。哑光选项也是可用的，尽管只有1200p。
2400p SKU的边缘到边缘的玻璃保护面板。哑光选项也是可用的，尽管只有1200p。
四面都是非常窄的边框，特别是对于工作站来说。
四面都是非常窄的边框，特别是对于工作站来说。
由于光泽覆盖，RGB子像素清晰，几乎没有颗粒感问题
由于光泽覆盖，RGB子像素清晰，几乎没有颗粒感问题
沿着顶部边缘有轻微的不均匀背光渗出
沿着顶部边缘有轻微的不均匀背光渗出
457.1
cd/m²		482.7
cd/m²		464.7
cd/m²
481.3
cd/m²		501.5
cd/m²		479.2
cd/m²
453.4
cd/m²		464.1
cd/m²		415.5
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Sharp LQ156R1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 501.5 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 466.6 cd/m² Minimum: 30.68 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 501.5 cd/m²
Contrast: 1140:1 (Black: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.73 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.88, calibrated: 0.51
ΔE Greyscale 3.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
100% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.08
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Sharp LQ156R1, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2400		Lenovo ThinkPad P15 G2-20YQ001JGE
N156HCE_GN1, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080		HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
SDC4145, OLED, 15.6", 3840x2160		Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160		Dell Precision 7550
AU Optronics B156ZAN, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160		Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Sharp LQ156R1, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2400		Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Samsung SDCA029, OLED, 15.6", 3840x2160
Display
-19%
0%
-7%
-5%
-2%
1%
Display P3 Coverage
94.9
68.6
-28%
99.9
5%
82.1
-13%
82.1
-13%
89.9
-5%
99.9
5%
sRGB Coverage
100
99.8
0%
100
0%
97.6
-2%
99.6
0%
100
0%
100
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
100
70.6
-29%
95.3
-5%
95
-5%
96.8
-3%
99.9
0%
97.3
-3%
Response Times
34%
94%
-19%
-10%
-5%
90%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
47.2 ?(25.2, 22)
37.6 ?(18, 19.6)
20%
2.4 ?(1, 1.4)
95%
58 ?(27, 31)
-23%
51.2 ?(24.4, 26.8)
-8%
46 ?(24, 22)
3%
4 ?(2, 2)
92%
Response Time Black / White *
30.4 ?(16.4, 14)
16 ?(6, 10)
47%
2.4 ?(1.1, 1.3)
92%
35 ?(20, 15)
-15%
34 ?(20, 14)
-12%
34 ?(17.6, 16.4)
-12%
4 ?(2, 2)
87%
PWM Frequency
26040 ?(50, 118)
240.4 ?(52)
Screen
9%
-73%
10%
-68%
-79%
140%
Brightness middle
501.5
498
-1%
379.6
-24%
344
-31%
473.5
-6%
469.8
-6%
380
-24%
Brightness
467
490
5%
380
-19%
335
-28%
461
-1%
464
-1%
388
-17%
Brightness Distribution
83
95
14%
95
14%
93
12%
90
8%
85
2%
93
12%
Black Level *
0.44
0.39
11%
0.37
16%
0.55
-25%
0.42
5%
0.018
96%
Contrast
1140
1277
12%
930
-18%
861
-24%
1119
-2%
21111
1752%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.73
2.1
56%
5.15
-9%
1.76
63%
4.8
-1%
5.16
-9%
5.47
-16%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.45
5.6
34%
7.79
8%
4.31
49%
8.73
-3%
9.33
-10%
8.19
3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.51
0.8
-57%
3.1
-508%
3.08
-504%
3.75
-635%
3.04
-496%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.6
3.4
6%
2.6
28%
3.12
13%
5.6
-56%
5.5
-53%
5.3
-47%
Gamma
2.08 106%
2.32 95%
1.99 111%
2.2 100%
2.34 94%
2 110%
2.15 102%
CCT
6447 101%
7162 91%
6166 105%
6563 99%
7549 86%
6198 105%
6128 106%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
85
86.4
89.2
86
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
98
99.7
100
100
Total Average (Program / Settings)
8% / 6%
7% / -27%
-5% / 1%
-28% / -46%
-29% / -52%
77% / 103%

* ... smaller is better

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. DCI-P3
vs. DCI-P3

颜色可以在开箱后进行更好的校准，因为平均灰度和颜色deltaE值分别为3.6和4.73，还算不错。在用X-Rite色度计进行校准后，我们能够将这两个数值分别降到1以下。

校准前的灰度(AdobeRGB)
校准前的灰度(AdobeRGB)
校准前的饱和度扫描（AdobeRGB
校准前的饱和度扫描（AdobeRGB
校准前的ColorChecker（AdobeRGB）。
校准前的ColorChecker（AdobeRGB）。
校准后的灰度(sRGB)
校准后的灰度(sRGB)
校准后的饱和度扫描（sRGB
校准后的饱和度扫描（sRGB
校准后的ColorChecker（sRGB
校准后的ColorChecker（sRGB

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.4 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
47.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 25.2 ms rise
↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 80 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8529 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

室外能见度比在 雷蛇刀片15工作室或华硕ProArt，因为我们的Precision 5560 上有更明亮的背光。然而，一些眩光将始终存在于光面的覆盖物上。用户可能要考虑用哑光1200p显示屏选项来代替，以减少眩光。

宽广的IPS可视角度
宽广的IPS可视角度
在一个明亮的阴天，在户外
在一个明亮的阴天，在户外
在户外的阴凉处
在户外的阴凉处
在一个明亮的阴天，在户外
在一个明亮的阴天，在户外

性能 - 45 W TGP Quadro RTX显卡

戴尔同时提供非vPro (i5-11500H, i7-11800H)和vPro (i7-11850H, i9-11950H, Xeon W-11955M)Tiger Lake-H选项，以及Nvidia Quadro GPU (NVIDIA T1200, RTX A2000) 几乎适用于所有配置。这些GPU、vPro CPU和相关的可选ECC内存是将Precision 5560与消费级的XPS 15系列区分开来的原因。

我们测试装置上的Quadro RTX A2000 GPU支持可调整栏和动态提升2.0，但不支持高级优化或WhisperMode 2.0。在只有45W的TGP下，这在技术上是一个Max-Q GPU，即使Max-Q不在名字中。相比之下，Precision 5550中的旧版Quadro T2000 Max-Q估计在40 W TGP范围内。

在运行以下基准测试之前，我们的设备通过戴尔电源管理器软件被设置为超性能模式，以获得尽可能高的分数。

处理器

整体多线程性能比酷睿i7-11800H慢15%左右，这是为集成vPro支持付出的代价。根据我们的经验，升级到酷睿i9-11950H后，多线程性能有望提高20%。 惠普ZBook Studio 15 G8.然而，单线程性能几乎保持不变。

正如下面一致的CineBench R15 xT结果所示，性能的可持续性很好。

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

01102203304405506607708809901100121013201430154016501760187019802090Tooltip
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1525 (1468.05-1546.97)
Lenovo ThinkPad P15 G2-20YQ001JGE Intel Core i7-11800H; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1784 (1751.62-1891.16)
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL AMD Ryzen 7 5800H; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø2123 (2107.59-2141.44)
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) Intel Core i7-11800H; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1867 (1776.59-1876.96)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5020 Points +31%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
4660 Points +22%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15 G2-20YQ001JGE
Intel Core i7-11800H
4389 Points +15%
Average Intel Core i7-11850H
  (3826 - 4663, n=2)
4245 Points +11%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
4161 Points +9%
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Xeon W-10885M
3930 Points +3%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
3826 Points
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H
3762 Points -2%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Core i7-10875H
3429 Points -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15 Gen1-20ST000DGE
Intel Core i7-10750H
3147 Points -18%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
3133 Points -18%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen2-20W6000GGE
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1949 Points -49%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen1-20T4000JGE
Intel Core i7-10510U
1602 Points -58%
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1547 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
304 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
232 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3826 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
583 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
9779 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1513 Points
Help

系统性能

PCMark得分一直高于Precision 5550，特别是在GPU重的数字内容创作基准中，RTX A2000可以比Quadro T2000 Max-Q灵活。

PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
PCMark 10 / Score
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB
6751 Points +1%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
6676 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
  (n=1)
6676 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15 G2-20YQ001JGE
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
6564 Points -2%
Dell Precision 7550
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB
5904 Points -12%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB
5442 Points -18%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
4884 Points -27%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4877 Points -27%
PCMark 10 Score
6676 points
Help

DPC延时

LatencyMon显示在打开多个浏览器标签或运行Prime95时没有DPC延迟问题。在60FPS下的4K视频播放也是完全流畅的，没有丢帧。我们对任何工作站的期望都不低。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Dell Precision 7550
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB
10043 μs * -1223%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15 G2-20YQ001JGE
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
6356 μs * -737%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
1938 μs * -155%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB
1508 μs * -99%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
759 μs *
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
716 μs * +6%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB
305 μs * +60%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

戴尔已经向我们证实，两个M.2存储托架都支持PCIe4 x4固态硬盘，而Precision 5550上只有PCIe3。即使是 Alienware x17 R1也只能支持一个PCIe4 x4 SSD，尽管有两个M.2 SSD插槽。我们的测试设备配备了一个 三星PM9A1这是目前最快的消费级PCIe4固态硬盘之一，因此它的性能比去年型号的SK海力士PC601A有了巨大的提升。

CDM 8
CDM 8
AS SSD
AS SSD
两个M.2 PCIe4 x4 2280插槽，包含铜质散热片
两个M.2 PCIe4 x4 2280插槽，包含铜质散热片
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB		Lenovo ThinkPad P15 G2-20YQ001JGE
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G		HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB		Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR		Dell Precision 7550
SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB		Dell Precision 5550 P91F
SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB		Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
AS SSD
-8%
-16%
-16%
-42%
-142%
-34%
Seq Read
5169
5105
-1%
2953
-43%
2702
-48%
2028
-61%
2039
-61%
1982
-62%
Seq Write
1986
1815
-9%
1691
-15%
2348
18%
1193
-40%
1376
-31%
2252
13%
4K Read
78
47.46
-39%
43.98
-44%
37.59
-52%
42.31
-46%
44.11
-43%
47.13
-40%
4K Write
214.6
137.3
-36%
105.4
-51%
107.1
-50%
105.5
-51%
113.3
-47%
88.2
-59%
4K-64 Read
1232
2112
71%
1065
-14%
1491
21%
1128
-8%
1094
-11%
1481
20%
4K-64 Write
2719
1702
-37%
1957
-28%
1794
-34%
1537
-43%
1630
-40%
1842
-32%
Access Time Read *
0.024
0.065
-171%
0.04
-67%
0.046
-92%
0.069
-188%
0.059
-146%
0.087
-263%
Access Time Write *
0.059
0.03
49%
0.105
-78%
0.034
42%
0.106
-80%
0.99
-1578%
0.04
32%
Score Read
1827
2670
46%
1404
-23%
1798
-2%
1373
-25%
1342
-27%
1726
-6%
Score Write
3133
2021
-35%
2232
-29%
2136
-32%
1762
-44%
1881
-40%
2155
-31%
Score Total
5753
5885
2%
4297
-25%
4835
-16%
3801
-34%
3883
-33%
4781
-17%
Copy ISO MB/s
3201
2054
-36%
2474
-23%
2302
-28%
1768
-45%
2489
-22%
1982
-38%
Copy Program MB/s
415.8
714
72%
1074
158%
564
36%
627
51%
682
64%
501
20%
Copy Game MB/s
1212
1431
18%
1929
59%
1336
10%
1477
22%
1515
25%
1140
-6%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-9%
-29%
38%
-35%
-36%
-26%
Write 4K
172.4
141.1
-18%
110.5
-36%
1107
542%
121
-30%
122.6
-29%
132.9
-23%
Read 4K
78.8
58.8
-25%
51.8
-34%
43.38
-45%
42.16
-46%
42.4
-46%
46.73
-41%
Write Seq
2991
3320
11%
2071
-31%
2387
-20%
2150
-28%
2167
-28%
2214
-26%
Read Seq
3351
2994
-11%
2505
-25%
2431
-27%
1755
-48%
1747
-48%
2018
-40%
Write 4K Q32T1
459.2
626
36%
429.8
-6%
340.7
-26%
395.3
-14%
388.8
-15%
478.9
4%
Read 4K Q32T1
484.3
401.8
-17%
418.3
-14%
397.8
-18%
381.8
-21%
367.3
-24%
540
12%
Write Seq Q32T1
4761
3742
-21%
3060
-36%
2390
-50%
2730
-43%
2629
-45%
2975
-38%
Read Seq Q32T1
7071
5097
-28%
3539
-50%
3502
-50%
3468
-51%
3460
-51%
3195
-55%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-9% / -8%
-23% / -21%
11% / 4%
-39% / -40%
-89% / -103%
-30% / -31%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7071 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 4761 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 484.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 459.2 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 3351 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2991 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 78.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 172.4 MB/s

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

GPU性能

原始图形性能来自 芯片的原始图形性能舒适地介于消费者的 GeForce GTX 1650 Ti和 GTX 1660 Ti或比老款的 Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q.与Quadro T2000 Max-Q相比，性能提升更为显著，为40%至50%。 Quadro T2000 Max-Q Precision 升级到Quadro RTX A3000 ，这在Precision 5560系列上是不存在的，可以比我们的Quadro RTX A2000带来30%至40%的性能提升。

有趣的是，SpecViewPerf分数在我们的RTX A2000和上一代Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q之间比预期的更接近，尽管更耗电的旧版图灵GPU表明我们的安培GPU在工作站类型的负载中得到了改进的优化。

如果是游戏，预计性能会比GTX 1660 Ti慢20%至30%左右，因为Quadro GPU没有针对游戏进行优化。例如，《奇异旅团》有时会在基准测试一两分钟后崩溃。

3DMark 11
3DMark 11
Cloud Gate
Cloud Gate
皇家港
皇家港
Fire Strike
Fire Strike
Fire Strike Ultra
Fire Strike Ultra
Time Spy
Time Spy
SPECviewperf 13 | SPECviewperf 12 | SPECviewperf 2020 | 3DMark | 3DMark 11
SPECviewperf 13
3ds Max (3dsmax-06)
Lenovo ThinkPad P15 G2-20YQ001JGE
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
179 fps +32%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H
177.3 fps +31%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M
176.2 fps +30%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
  (120.5 - 165, n=9)
139.4 fps +3%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H
135.1 fps
HP ZBook Studio G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i9-10885H
134.6 fps 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15 Gen1-20ST000DGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-10750H
98.5 fps -27%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H
88.9 fps -34%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen2-20W6000GGE
NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU, i7-1165G7
48.19 fps -64%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen1-20T4000JGE
NVIDIA Quadro P520, i7-10510U
25.31 fps -81%
Catia (catia-05)
Lenovo ThinkPad P15 G2-20YQ001JGE
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
256.5 fps +38%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M
242.9 fps +31%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
  (159.1 - 251, n=9)
205 fps +10%
HP ZBook Studio G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i9-10885H
194.8 fps +5%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H
186.1 fps
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H
143.9 fps -23%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15 Gen1-20ST000DGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-10750H
130.5 fps -30%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H
127.9 fps -31%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen2-20W6000GGE
NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU, i7-1165G7
83.9 fps -55%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen1-20T4000JGE
NVIDIA Quadro P520, i7-10510U
48.59 fps -74%
Creo (creo-02)
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M
224.9 fps +39%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15 G2-20YQ001JGE
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
209.6 fps +30%
HP ZBook Studio G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i9-10885H
168.3 fps +4%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
  (117.1 - 207, n=8)
165.1 fps +2%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H
161.4 fps
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H
156.8 fps -3%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H
116.8 fps -28%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15 Gen1-20ST000DGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-10750H
109.5 fps -32%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen2-20W6000GGE
NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU, i7-1165G7
57 fps -65%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen1-20T4000JGE
NVIDIA Quadro P520, i7-10510U
36.01 fps -78%
Energy (energy-02)
Lenovo ThinkPad P15 G2-20YQ001JGE
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
41.21 fps +42%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M
36.8 fps +27%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
  (23.9 - 36.8, n=9)
32.1 fps +10%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H
29.09 fps
HP ZBook Studio G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i9-10885H
27.08 fps -7%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H
21.17 fps -27%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H
15.66 fps -46%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15 Gen1-20ST000DGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-10750H
15.62 fps -46%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen2-20W6000GGE
NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU, i7-1165G7
8.62 fps -70%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen1-20T4000JGE
NVIDIA Quadro P520, i7-10510U
0.77 fps -97%
Maya (maya-05)
Lenovo ThinkPad P15 G2-20YQ001JGE
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
211.4 fps +30%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M
210.4 fps +30%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H
200.8 fps +24%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
  (117.2 - 221, n=9)
174.5 fps +8%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H
162 fps
HP ZBook Studio G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i9-10885H
160.8 fps -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15 Gen1-20ST000DGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-10750H
113.3 fps -30%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H
110.2 fps -32%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen2-20W6000GGE
NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU, i7-1165G7
50.2 fps -69%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen1-20T4000JGE
NVIDIA Quadro P520, i7-10510U
40.97 fps -75%
Medical (medical-02)
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M
97.7 fps +47%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15 G2-20YQ001JGE
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
89.2 fps +34%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
  (54.7 - 78.3, n=9)
70.4 fps +6%
HP ZBook Studio G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i9-10885H
69.5 fps +4%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H
66.6 fps
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H
56.8 fps -15%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H
48.02 fps -28%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15 Gen1-20ST000DGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-10750H
41.62 fps -38%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen2-20W6000GGE
NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU, i7-1165G7
26.29 fps -61%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen1-20T4000JGE
NVIDIA Quadro P520, i7-10510U
19.34 fps -71%
Showcase (showcase-02)
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H
100.3 fps +59%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M
95.2 fps +51%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15 G2-20YQ001JGE
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
89.9 fps +43%
HP ZBook Studio G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i9-10885H
71.5 fps +13%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
  (58.8 - 79.2, n=9)
68 fps +8%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H
63 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P15 Gen1-20ST000DGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-10750H
45.71 fps -27%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H
42.39 fps -33%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen2-20W6000GGE
NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU, i7-1165G7
16.88 fps -73%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen1-20T4000JGE
NVIDIA Quadro P520, i7-10510U
14.52 fps -77%
Siemens NX (snx-03)
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M
295.2 fps +67%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15 G2-20YQ001JGE
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
250.2 fps +42%
HP ZBook Studio G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i9-10885H
195.8 fps +11%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
  (135.2 - 223, n=9)
191 fps +8%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H
176.3 fps
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H
139.4 fps -21%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15 Gen1-20ST000DGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-10750H
133.1 fps -25%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen2-20W6000GGE
NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU, i7-1165G7
71.2 fps -60%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen1-20T4000JGE
NVIDIA Quadro P520, i7-10510U
49.83 fps -72%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H
18.89 fps -89%
Solidworks (sw-04)
Lenovo ThinkPad P15 G2-20YQ001JGE
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
156.7 fps +11%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M
150.4 fps +7%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
  (121.3 - 177, n=9)
144.6 fps +3%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H
140.8 fps
HP ZBook Studio G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i9-10885H
126.7 fps -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15 Gen1-20ST000DGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-10750H
105.6 fps -25%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H
103.9 fps -26%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H
92.3 fps -34%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen2-20W6000GGE
NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU, i7-1165G7
80.4 fps -43%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen1-20T4000JGE
NVIDIA Quadro P520, i7-10510U
60.5 fps -57%
SPECviewperf 13 | SPECviewperf 12 | SPECviewperf 2020 | 3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark 11 Performance
15399 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
29697 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
10908 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
4746 points
Help
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | GTA V | Dota 2 Reborn | The Witcher 3 | X-Plane 11.11 | Strange Brigade | Far Cry 5
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1280x720 Lite Quality
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
199 fps +129%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
177 fps +104%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15 G2-20YQ001JGE
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
160 fps +84%
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Xeon W-10885M, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
154 fps +77%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
151 fps +74%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
144 fps +66%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
137 fps +58%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
  (86.9 - 164.3, n=9)
127 fps +46%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
91 fps +5%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
86.9 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen2-20W6000GGE
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
51.1 fps -41%
1920x1080 Standard Quality
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
130 fps +106%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
106 fps +68%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
104 fps +65%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
103 fps +63%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15 G2-20YQ001JGE
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
101 fps +60%
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Xeon W-10885M, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
99.7 fps +58%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
87.6 fps +39%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
  (51.9 - 90.5, n=9)
72.9 fps +15%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
63.2 fps
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
48.5 fps -23%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen2-20W6000GGE
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
23.6 fps -63%
1920x1080 High Quality
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
97.1 fps +108%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
80.8 fps +73%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
78.9 fps +69%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
78.5 fps +68%
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Xeon W-10885M, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
77.3 fps +66%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15 G2-20YQ001JGE
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
75.1 fps +61%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
63.9 fps +37%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
  (38.3 - 64, n=9)
52.5 fps +13%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
46.6 fps
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
36.8 fps -21%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen2-20W6000GGE
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
16.5 fps -65%
3840x2160 High Quality
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
36.2 fps +88%
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Xeon W-10885M, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
32.8 fps +70%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
  (17.7 - 26, n=5)
21.3 fps +10%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
19.3 fps
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
13.7 fps -29%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen2-20W6000GGE
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
5.73 fps -70%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | GTA V | Dota 2 Reborn | The Witcher 3 | X-Plane 11.11 | Strange Brigade | Far Cry 5

Witcher 3 FPS Chart

051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Dell Precision 5000 5560 i7-11850H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU: Ø85.7 (80-92)
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
GTA V (2015) 179 170 112 57.8 42.9
The Witcher 3 (2015) 259.8 151.9 92.4 50 33.1
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 173 155 130 119 62.9
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 86.9 63.2 46.6 34.4 19.3
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 112 89.2 75.1 45.3
Far Cry 5 (2018) 120 82 77 69 49
Strange Brigade (2018) 251 60.4
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 107 62 58 55 40 17
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) 106 72 71 59 49
Metro Exodus (2019) 110.4 55.1 42.3 34.9 27
Borderlands 3 (2019) 115.5 60.7 46.2 36
Gears Tactics (2020) 104.3 113.7 77.5 53.4 37.3
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) 81 60 55 49 41
Watch Dogs Legion (2020) 86 62 51 29 20
Dirt 5 (2020) 86.3 68 54.6 41.9 34
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020) 80 55 39 32 27
Immortals Fenyx Rising (2020) 107 80 72 64 53
Hitman 3 (2021) 166.6 83.4 78.6 73.9 48.4
F1 2021 (2021) 114 120 104 37 24

Emissions

系统噪音

有趣的是，风扇噪音明显比我们在Precision 5550上观察到的要安静。虽然Precision 5550的风扇噪音可以达到50dB(A)以上，但在我们的Precision 5560上，即使在相同的压力条件下，最大也只能达到41.4dB(A)。这种较低的风扇上限是值得赞赏的，它实际上有助于该系统成为市场上最安静的超薄移动工作站之一，但这是以较高的核心温度为代价的。我们下面的压力测试部分将显示两台笔记本电脑在运行Prime95时的CPU温度相差16C。

风扇噪音曲线（白色。背景，红色。系统空闲，蓝色：3DMark 06，橙色：Witcher 3 ，绿色。Prime95+FurMark压力)
风扇噪音曲线（白色。背景，红色。系统空闲，蓝色：3DMark 06，橙色：Witcher 3 ，绿色。Prime95+FurMark压力)
Dell Precision 5000 5560
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB		Lenovo ThinkPad P15 G2-20YQ001JGE
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G		HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB		Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR		Dell Precision 7550
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB		Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB		Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
Noise
-25%
-18%
-26%
-27%
-17%
-28%
off / environment *
23.4
24.3
-4%
23.5
-0%
25.2
-8%
25.8
-10%
26.2
-12%
30.1
-29%
Idle Minimum *
23.6
24.3
-3%
25.3
-7%
27.9
-18%
25.8
-9%
26.2
-11%
30.1
-28%
Idle Average *
23.6
24.3
-3%
25.3
-7%
27.9
-18%
25.8
-9%
26.2
-11%
30.1
-28%
Idle Maximum *
23.6
28.6
-21%
25.3
-7%
27.9
-18%
25.9
-10%
26.2
-11%
30.1
-28%
Load Average *
25.8
47.5
-84%
41.2
-60%
47
-82%
51.2
-98%
39.2
-52%
42.3
-64%
Witcher 3 ultra *
40.1
49.4
-23%
51.9
-29%
39
3%
48.2
-20%
Load Maximum *
41.4
54.9
-33%
49.4
-19%
46.9
-13%
51.9
-25%
50.6
-22%
42.1
-2%

* ... smaller is better

Noise Level

Idle
23.6 / 23.6 / 23.6 dB(A)
Load
25.8 / 41.4 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 23.4 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.833.337.234.637.12525.831.725.826.327.33121.325.421.920.922.54022.420.419.220.221.55023.219.820.919.6196320.921.120.620.220.58022.820.821.721.522.910019.920.418.219.419.712520.718.615.216.120.616020.216.614.413.7202002116.914.413.721.725023.317.314.113.723.831524.517.715.915.424.840024.515.814.213.324.950025.715.513.313.726.663023.914.611.31126.380024.513.210.510.52510003013.410.610.529.6125027.713.710.510.429.4160028.814.110.510.329.8200028.414.110.810.629.6250030.914.310.810.732.5315030.213.21111.231.9400029.212.111.411.230.6500029.412.311.511.630.5630024.812.111.611.627.5800019.312.612.211.7211000015.712.51211.616.31250016.413.81311.4161600012.511.510.810.712.3SPL40.125.823.623.441.4N3.20.70.50.53.5median 24.5median 14.1median 11.6median 11.6median 25Delta4.41.91.41.54.6hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseDell Precision 5000 5560

温度

负载下的表面温度与我们在Precision 5550上记录的相似，顶部和底部的热点分别接近49℃和45℃。由于内部的对称冷却方案，温度的发展在很大程度上是对称的，因此键盘中心的温度会比掌托或边缘的温度高很多。该ThinkPad P15 Gen 2是一个比我们的Precision 5560更强大的移动工作站，但其热点会因此而变得更热，超过63℃。

后排气管
后排气管
高负荷运行一小时后，AC适配器
高负荷运行一小时后，AC适配器
Max. Load
 35 °C46.4 °C35.8 °C 
 38.4 °C48.2 °C34.8 °C 
 30.8 °C29 °C27.8 °C 
Maximum: 48.2 °C
Average: 36.2 °C
33.8 °C42.6 °C35.6 °C
32 °C39.6 °C34.4 °C
30.2 °C32.8 °C32 °C
Maximum: 42.6 °C
Average: 34.8 °C
Power Supply (max.)  43 °C | Room Temperature 20.8 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 32 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Workstation.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.2 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 41.3 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.8 °C / 87.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (-3 °C / -5.4 F).
系统空闲（顶部
系统空闲（顶部
系统闲置（底部
系统闲置（底部
Witcher 3 压力（顶部
Witcher 3 压力（顶部
Witcher 3 应力（底部）
Witcher 3 应力（底部）
Prime95+FurMark的压力（顶）。
Prime95+FurMark的压力（顶）。
Prime95+FurMark的压力（底部）。
Prime95+FurMark的压力（底部）。

压力测试

当运行Prime95时，CPU在达到100C的核心温度之前的头几秒钟会提升到3.8GHz。然后时钟速率会在接下来的一分钟左右下降到2.8至3.0GHz的范围，然后进一步下降到2.5至2.8GHz的范围。核心温度最终将稳定在90℃左右，而惠普ZBook Studio 15 G8的温度为98℃，Precision 5550的温度仅为74℃。

当运行 Witcher 3代表压力负荷时，CPU和GPU将分别稳定在69摄氏度和75摄氏度，而Precision 5550则为66摄氏度和67摄氏度。实时GPU板的功耗将稳定在45W，而Precision 5550的功耗为40W，这可能部分解释了我们的Precision 5560的GPU温度略高。

用电池供电运行会影响性能。在电池上进行的3DMark 11测试将返回物理和图形分数，分别为14330和12191分，而在电源上则为15788和16236分。

系统空闲
系统空闲
Witcher 3 压力
Witcher 3 压力
Prime95压力
Prime95压力
Prime95+FurMark压力
Prime95+FurMark压力
CPU时钟(GHz) GPU时钟(MHz) CPU平均温度(℃) GPU平均温度(℃)
系统空闲 -- -- 46 45
Prime95压力 2.5 - 2.8 -- ~90 63
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 0.8 - 1.4 1000 - 1400 64 - 75 63 - 75
Witcher 3 Stress ~1.6 1462 69 75

发言人

在最大音量下的粉红噪音显示，扬声器比惠普ZBook Studio 15 G8的扬声器更柔和。
在最大音量下的粉红噪音显示，扬声器比惠普ZBook Studio 15 G8的扬声器更柔和。
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.337.233.32527.925.827.93122.721.922.74023.419.223.4502820.9286331.220.631.28034.721.734.710039.918.239.912542.315.242.316047.914.447.920050.814.450.825055.914.155.931559.815.959.840062.514.262.550063.713.363.763062.211.362.280064.110.564.1100065.810.665.8125066.210.566.2160067.910.567.920006510.865250061.310.861.3315062.71162.7400055.811.455.8500058.911.558.9630057.511.657.580005412.2541000055.31255.31250056.41356.41600049.710.849.7SPL75.223.675.2N35.50.535.5median 58.9median 11.6median 58.9Delta6.21.46.235.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseDell Precision 5000 5560Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Dell Precision 5000 5560 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Energy Management

消耗功率

电源消耗是一个混合的袋子。在较低的负载下，我们的设备会比Precision 5550更耗电（6瓦至24瓦，而5瓦至19瓦），这可能是我们下一节中电池寿命较短的原因。另一方面，尽管我们的CPU和GPU可以比Core i7-10875H和Quadro T2000 Max-Q分别快15%和50%，但在运行游戏等高负荷时，功耗会与Precision 5550几乎相同。因此，在运行高要求的应用程序时，每瓦性能同比更高。

我们能够从小型（约14.3 x 6.5 x 2.2厘米）的130瓦USB-C交流适配器记录到133瓦的临时最大消耗。由于热限制，消耗量随着时间的推移而下降，正如我们下面的图表所示。当连接到主电源时，电池不会耗尽，这在一些早期的 5750机型上是不存在的。 一些早期的Precision 5750型号.

3DMark 06的耗电量
3DMark 06的耗电量
Witcher 3 超级设置下的耗电量
Witcher 3 超级设置下的耗电量
在启动Prime95压力时，消耗量会瞬间飙升至126瓦，然后下降并稳定在80瓦。
在启动Prime95压力时，消耗量会瞬间飙升至126瓦，然后下降并稳定在80瓦。
当同时启动Prime95和FurMark时，消耗量会瞬间飙升至132.5瓦。然后随着时间的推移，消耗量会显著下降
当同时启动Prime95和FurMark时，消耗量会瞬间飙升至132.5瓦。然后随着时间的推移，消耗量会显著下降
Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.49 / 1.8 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 6.2 / 13.9 / 23.8 Watt
Load midlight 95.7 / 132.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Dell Precision 5000 5560
i7-11850H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 3840x2400, 15.6"		Lenovo ThinkPad P15 G2-20YQ001JGE
i7-11800H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
i9-11950H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6"		Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
i7-9750H, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6"		Dell Precision 7550
W-10885M, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6"		Dell Precision 5550 P91F
i7-10875H, Quadro T2000 Max-Q, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB, IPS, 3840x2400, 15.6"		Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
i7-10875H, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6"
Power Consumption
-11%
-43%
-30%
-38%
7%
-44%
Idle Minimum *
6.2
6.3
-2%
11
-77%
11.6
-87%
8.2
-32%
5.6
10%
13.4
-116%
Idle Average *
13.9
10.7
23%
18.8
-35%
19
-37%
16.8
-21%
11.2
19%
18
-29%
Idle Maximum *
23.8
11.6
51%
31.7
-33%
20.6
13%
24.4
-3%
18.4
23%
26.1
-10%
Load Average *
95.7
99.3
-4%
105.2
-10%
102
-7%
131
-37%
114
-19%
115
-20%
Witcher 3 ultra *
87
154
-77%
148
-70%
156.6
-80%
76.7
12%
145
-67%
Load Maximum *
132.6
210
-58%
171.8
-30%
178
-34%
201.8
-52%
134.2
-1%
165
-24%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest

0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
Dell Precision 5000 5560; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø87 (80.1-94.8)
Dell Precision 5000 5560; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø98.9 (65.1-133)

电池寿命

运行时间通常比我们在去年的Precision 5550上记录的时间要短。实际的WLAN使用只能持续6.5小时左右，而老款机型则为9小时，即使两者都设置为相同的平衡电源配置文件，且Optimus处于激活状态。

从空电到满电大约需要2小时。我们赞赏该系统可以通过其三个USB-C端口中的任何一个进行充电，而一些笔记本电脑只支持一个USB-C端口的充电。同样的戴尔充电器也可用于为现代XPS笔记本电脑充电。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
12h 02min
WiFi Websurfing
6h 20min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 50min
Dell Precision 5000 5560
i7-11850H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, 86 Wh		Lenovo ThinkPad P15 G2-20YQ001JGE
i7-11800H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, 94 Wh		HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
i9-11950H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh		Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
i7-9750H, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, 76 Wh		Dell Precision 7550
W-10885M, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, 95 Wh		Dell Precision 5550 P91F
i7-10875H, Quadro T2000 Max-Q, 86 Wh		Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
i7-10875H, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, 80 Wh
Battery Runtime
14%
0%
-26%
-4%
35%
-10%
Reader / Idle
722
774
7%
666
-8%
1354
88%
527
-27%
WiFi v1.3
380
596
57%
369
-3%
281
-26%
534
41%
540
42%
341
-10%
Load
110
78
-29%
106
-4%
62
-44%
82
-25%
119
8%

Pros

+ 与Precision 5550系列相比，显着的图形提升
+ 支持最多两个PCIe4 NVMe固态硬盘
+ 紧凑的USB-C交流适配器
+ 高质量的16:10显示
+ 没有DPC延迟问题

Cons

- GPU温度稍高
- 基本保修期只有12个月
- 电池寿命略短
- 没有网络摄像头快门
- 没有OLED选项

结论 - 相同的外观，更快的图形

在审查中。戴尔Precision 5560。测试装置由戴尔提供
在审查中。戴尔Precision 5560。测试装置由戴尔提供

为什么要购买Precision 5560，因为它在视觉上与 5550完全相同。 Precision 5550?GPU功率的跃升将是考虑较新机型而非较旧机型的主要原因。Nvidia的Quadro RTX A2000比Quadro T2000 Max-Q领先一代，在功耗、电池寿命、重量、表面温度、甚至风扇噪音方面的成本最低，提供高达50%的GPU性能。仅仅是每瓦性能的提高就有助于使该系统的性能比其超薄的外形所显示的要快。用户也将获得CPU性能的提升，尽管幅度小得多。

与Precision 5550相比，GPU功率有了巨大的提升。然而，如果你对Quadro RTX A2000不感兴趣，那么你可能想考虑去年视觉上相同的型号。

不管是什么原因，我们的Precision 5560无法达到我们在5550上经历的最大风扇噪音上限。这有可能是制造商为了降低风扇噪音而故意为之，但它确实对核心温度有一定的影响。

知道自己可以从图形能力的提升中获益的用户将希望跳过Precision 5550，而选择5560。否则，5550在物理功能和显示方面可以提供相同的用户体验。竞争者如 微星WS66, Razer Blade 15 Studio, 或 联想ThinkPad P15 G2这些产品略微厚一些，但它们携带的Quadro RTX A3000及以上版本的GPU速度更快，而这些GPU在Precision 5000系列上是没有的。

价格和可用性

我们的Core i7和Quadro RTX A2000配置可以在Newegg 和 沃尔玛 从2800美元到3400美元不等。其他SKU也有，包括在 亚马逊.为了获得最多选择，用户可以直接从Dell.com订购。.

Dell Precision 5000 5560 - 10/06/2021 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo

Chassis
86 / 98 → 88%
Keyboard
89%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
71 / 80 → 89%
Weight
63 / 10-66 → 95%
Battery
71 / 95 → 74%
Display
84%
Games Performance
90%
Application Performance
96%
Workstation
88%
Temperature
88 / 95 → 92%
Noise
96 / 90 → 100%
Audio
73%
Camera
37 / 85 → 43%
Average
80%
88%
Workstation - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Modellvarianten USD 559.90
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 戴尔Precision 5560工作站回顾。Quadro RTX A2000的提升
Allen Ngo, 2021-10- 9 (Update: 2021-10- 9)