Notebookcheck Logo

华硕ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED回顾:具有极端CPU性能的多媒体笔记本电脑

酷睿i9-13980HX和RTX 4070笔记本电脑。

华硕在ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED中为创意用户提供了一台强大的机器。英特尔的酷睿i9-13980HX和GeForce RTX 4070笔记本电脑照顾到了性能相关的事项,但新的120赫兹OLED面板并不完全令人信服。
Geforce Laptop / Notebook Raptor Lake Thunderbolt Touchscreen Windows

华硕的ProArt Studiobook 16主要针对创意用户,并在DialPad中提供了一个额外的输入功能。目前Studiobook 16 OLED 2023采用英特尔最快的移动处理器,即酷睿i9-13980HX,并结合新的 GeForce RTX 4070笔记本电脑。显示屏也发生了变化,因为4K OLED已经被换成了120赫兹的3K触摸屏模型。我们的测试设备是高端型号,配备64GB内存和4TB PCIe SSD,售价3999欧元(4380美元)。另外,还有一个RTX 4070笔记本电脑的变体,32GB内存和2TB固态硬盘,价格为3499欧元(3800美元),或一个 RTX 4060 笔记本电脑32GB内存和1TB固态硬盘,价格为2999欧元(3300美元)。

Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 (ProArt StudioBook 16 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i9-13980HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.6 GHz, 170 W PL2 / Short Burst, 130 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 2175 MHz, RAM: 2000 MHz, 130 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 535.98, Optimus
Memory
64 GB 
, DDR5-5600, Dual-Channel, 2 Slots, max. 64 GB
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 3200 x 2000 pixel 236 PPI, capacitive, native pen support, ATNA60BX01-1, OLED, glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)
Storage
Phison EM2804TBMTCB47, 4096 GB 
, 3717 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Raptor Lake-S PCH - cAVS
Connections
2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo, Card Reader: SD Express 7.0
Networking
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 23.9 x 356 x 271
Battery
90 Wh, 5845 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
Camera
Webcam: 1080p with Privacy Shutter & IR
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Quad speakers, Keyboard: Chiclet 1.4mm travel, Keyboard Light: yes, 240W PSU, Mouse, Stylus, MyAsus, ProArt Creator Hub, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.434 kg, Power Supply: 737 g
Price
4000 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
86.1 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2023
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg23.9 mm16.00"3200x2000
86.2 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.1 kg18 mm16.00"3840x2400
89.4 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2023
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
1.8 kg16.5 mm16.00"2880x1800
89.2 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2023
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
3 kg21.3 mm17.30"3840x2160
93.7 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
M2 Max, M2 Max 38-Core GPU
2.2 kg16.8 mm16.20"3456x2234
88 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2023
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
2.7 kg29.7 mm16.00"2560x1600

案例--ProArt被限制住了

华硕在ProArt Studiobook 16上使用了黑色塑料,感觉相当优质。唯一的问题是光滑的表面,非常容易沾染指纹。总的来说,设计非常克制,除了盖子上的ProArt标志外,没有其他视觉上的强调。当你打开盖子时,键盘下面的大型拨号盘立即吸引了你的目光。盖子略微位于基本单元的前面,但这也使得最大的打开角度几乎达到180度。

底座和盖子的稳定性都很好。在扭转压力下不会发出吱吱嘎嘎的声音,也不会有任何凹陷。铰链调整得很好:它们有效地防止了摇晃,并将屏幕牢牢地固定住。只有在非常小的角度(小于20度),盖子才会因为重量而自行关闭。

Studiobook的重量不到2.5公斤,并不轻,而且由于其尺寸,也不是特别便携。这款笔记本仍然适合放在大型背包里,但作为一个16英寸的笔记本,自然会占用很多空间。它也是对比组中最大的16英寸设备,也不比17英寸设备小多少。这款笔记本的厚度也相当大,约为2.5厘米,仅次于Zephyrus Duo的第二个屏幕。对于240瓦的电源,你必须考虑到额外的740克的运输费用。

尺寸比较

399 mm 284 mm 21.3 mm 3 kg355 mm 266 mm 29.7 mm 2.7 kg356 mm 271 mm 23.9 mm 2.4 kg355.7 mm 248.1 mm 16.8 mm 2.2 kg354 mm 255 mm 18 mm 2.1 kg355.4 mm 250.4 mm 16.5 mm 1.8 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

设备 - Thunderbolt 4和HDMI 2.1

端口分布在两侧的前面区域和后面。大多数USB端口都在右前方,当完全占用时,会变得很拥挤。另一方面,华硕将电源插孔、以太网端口和HDMI输出放在了背面,在那里它们不会碍事。

左边:USB-A 3.2 Gen.2(10 GBit/s),3.5毫米音频,SD读卡器
左边:USB-A 3.2 Gen.2(10 GBit/s),3.5毫米音频,SD读卡器
右:2个USB-C 4.0与Thunderbolt 4(40 GBit/s,DisplayPort ALT模式,PowerDelivery),USB-A 3.2 Gen.2(10 GBit/s),安全锁插槽
右:2个USB-C 4.0与Thunderbolt 4(40 GBit/s,DisplayPort ALT模式,PowerDelivery),USB-A 3.2 Gen.2(10 GBit/s),安全锁插槽
后部:HDMI 2.1,电源,2.5 GBit/s以太网
后部:HDMI 2.1,电源,2.5 GBit/s以太网

SD卡阅读器

左边是成熟的SD卡读卡器,通过我们的参考卡(Angelbird AV Pro V60),它只能达到平均的传输速率。正如比赛所显示的那样,这里还有很多可能。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
196 MB/s +166%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
182 MB/s +147%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
181.2 (133.5min - 187.53max) MB/s +146%
Average of class Multimedia
  (18.4 - 201, n=59, last 2 years)
103.3 MB/s +40%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
74 MB/s 0%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX (Angelibird AV Pro V60)
73.7 MB/s
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H
66.3 (64.96min - 66.37max) MB/s -10%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
269 MB/s +224%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
222 MB/s +167%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
188.81 MB/s +127%
Average of class Multimedia
  (25.8 - 266, n=59, last 2 years)
142.9 MB/s +72%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX (Angelibird AV Pro V60)
83.1 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
83 MB/s 0%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H
75.43 MB/s -9%

沟通

主SSD下面的WLAN模块
主SSD下面的WLAN模块

华硕安装了英特尔的现代AX211 WLAN模块,它位于主固态硬盘的下方,可以被替换。与我们的华硕参考路由器相配合,传输速率非常高而且稳定。我们在审查期间没有遇到任何WLAN稳定性问题。背面还有一个用于有线网络的2.5Gbit/s以太网端口。

Networking
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1612 (min: 1550) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1735 (min: 1691) MBit/s ∼100%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1444 (min: 745) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1611 (min: 805) MBit/s ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1493 (min: 1452) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1638 (min: 1438) MBit/s ∼94%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel AX1675s 160MHz (211NGW)
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
946 (min: 894) MBit/s ∼59%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
888 MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1596 (min: 1244) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1554 (min: 783) MBit/s ∼86%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Broadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1730 (min: 1700) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1803 (min: 1749) MBit/s ∼100%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
MediaTek RZ616
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1767 (min: 1634) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1738 (min: 1633) MBit/s ∼96%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750Tooltip
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1612 (1550-1667)
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1735 (1691-1753)

网络摄像头

在良好的照明条件下,1080p网络摄像头可以拍摄出体面的照片,但它们也有些失真。还安装了一个红外模块,它支持通过Windows Hello进行面部识别。

ColorChecker
11.4 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
10 ∆E
9 ∆E
12 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
7 ∆E
9 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
20.2 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604: 10.07 ∆E min: 2.75 - max: 20.16 ∆E

辅料

我们的测试设备配备了华硕笔2.0以及无线ProArt鼠标MD300,其零售价为180美元。与笔记本本身一样,鼠标的侧面也安装了一个小的DialPad。你是否能有意义地使用它,取决于所使用的软件。你必须安装ArmoryCrate来调整鼠标的设置,而且你不能在ProArt Creator Hub中这样做,这有点令人恼火。在测试中,鼠标工作得很好,点击非常精确,但也很响。例如,罗技鼠标的静音按钮要安静得多。

维护

底部机箱盖是用10颗Torx螺丝(T5)固定的,在卸下这些螺丝后仍然非常紧。撬开盖子的最简单方法是在后部的风扇出口处。在内部,大型冷却系统占主导地位,维护选项也非常好,从WLAN模块(主固态硬盘下方)、两个SO DIMM插槽到两个用于固态硬盘的M.2 2280插槽。这里还引人注目的是额外的DialPad占用了多少空间

内部结构
内部结构
2个SO-DIMM
2个SO-DIMM
DialPad占用了大量的空间
DialPad占用了大量的空间

输入设备 - 拨号键盘和数字键盘

键盘

键盘的行程为1.4毫米,有一个专用的小键盘。打字的感觉很好,但按键不是最安静的,尤其是空格键的声音很大。这种布局也需要一点时间来适应,因为方向键很大,但被向下移动了。单排的回车键也不完美。有一个三段式的白色照明,但它不是通过传感器自动激活的。

输入设备
输入设备
大而有质感的方向键
大而有质感的方向键
键盘背光灯
键盘背光灯

触摸板

华硕DialPad
华硕DialPad

大型触摸板工作性能优异,可以随处点击,其特点是丰富而安静的点击声。特别之处在于DialPad,一个位于触摸板和键盘之间的大型旋转按钮。与Adobe应用程序的实施效果很好,但鼠标和键的组合通常更快。在正常的桌面使用中,亮度和音量也可以通过DialPad进行调整,但通过正常的特殊键或F键进行调整会快得多。

显示 - 120赫兹的OLED面板

子像素结构
子像素结构

华硕目前完全致力于OLED屏幕,Studiobook也不例外。与前代产品的4K OLED显示屏相比,这里使用的是3,200 x 2,000像素的OLED触摸屏,频率更高,为120 Hz。主观的图像质量非常好,但就像最近评测的ZenBook Pro 14一样,仔细观察时,明亮的区域显得有点颗粒感,这是由于触摸层的原因。亮度不能根据环境光线自动调整。

我们确定正常SDR模式下的平均亮度为350cd/m²,但由于OLED面板的黑值极低,对比度非常高。在HDR模式下,在一个小的图像部分,最高几乎是580cd/m²,在一个几乎完全白色的图像中,大约是480cd/m²。然而,HDR模式必须先在Windows设置中手动启用,之后就不能再使用颜色配置文件了。OLED面板上没有光晕。

348
cd/m²
347
cd/m²
349
cd/m²
348
cd/m²
349
cd/m²
350
cd/m²
348
cd/m²
347
cd/m²
365
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
ATNA60BX01-1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 365 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 350.1 cd/m² Minimum: 0.6 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 346 cd/m²
Contrast: 17450:1 (Black: 0.02 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.1
ΔE Greyscale 1.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
89.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
ATNA60BX01-1, OLED, 3200x2000, 16"
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Samsung SDC4191 (ATNA60YV09-0, OLED, 3840x2400, 16"
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung ATNA60CL03-0, AMOLED, 2880x1800, 16"
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
AUO41A2 B173ZAN06.C, Mini LED, 3840x2160, 17.3"
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.2"
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NE160QDM-NM4, MiniLED, 2560x1600, 16"
Display
3%
3%
-1%
-1%
1%
Display P3 Coverage
99.6
99.9
0%
99.9
0%
92
-8%
99
-1%
99.4
0%
sRGB Coverage
100
100
0%
100
0%
99.1
-1%
100
0%
100
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
89.4
96.4
8%
96.3
8%
94.07
5%
88.5
-1%
90.8
2%
Response Times
-155%
12%
-2281%
-4440%
40%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
0.59 ?(0.29, 0.3)
2 ?(1, 1)
-239%
0.49 ?(0.26, 0.23)
17%
46.4 ?(24, 22.4)
-7764%
80.5 ?(38.5, 42)
-13544%
15.2 ?(11.2, 4)
-2476%
Response Time Black / White *
0.79 ?(0.34, 0.45)
1.98 ?(0.5, 1.48)
-151%
0.65 ?(0.37, 0.28)
18%
0.62 ?(0.42, 0.2)
22%
47.2 ?(20.6, 26.6)
-5875%
19 ?(10.6, 8.4)
-2305%
PWM Frequency
240 ?(100)
60
-75%
240 ?(100)
0%
2400
900%
14880 ?(100, 500)
6100%
12000 ?(100)
4900%
Screen
-9%
-15%
-12%
370%
-15%
Brightness middle
349
389.97
12%
400
15%
397.29
14%
504
44%
712
104%
Brightness
350
395
13%
399
14%
392
12%
487
39%
703
101%
Brightness Distribution
95
97
2%
93
-2%
93
-2%
94
-1%
95
0%
Black Level *
0.02
0.03
-50%
0.03
-50%
0.02
-0%
0.001
95%
0.07
-250%
Contrast
17450
12999
-26%
13333
-24%
19865
14%
504000
2788%
10171
-42%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.1
2
5%
2.3
-10%
2.52
-20%
1.5
29%
1.7
19%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.5
4.1
25%
4.15
25%
3.91
29%
3.3
40%
4
27%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
2.1
1.68
20%
1.66
21%
2.52
-20%
1.2
43%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.2
2.23
-86%
2.7
-125%
2.78
-132%
2.1
-75%
2.8
-133%
Gamma
2.19 100%
2.41 91%
2.266 97%
2.63 84%
2.25 98%
2.21 100%
CCT
6545 99%
6323 103%
7047 92%
6412 101%
6882 94%
6978 93%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-54% / -36%
0% / -6%
-765% / -463%
-1357% / -740%
9% / -1%

* ... smaller is better

CalMAN灰度(配置文件:DisplayP3,目标色彩空间:P3)
CalMAN灰度(配置文件:DisplayP3,目标色彩空间:P3)
CalMAN饱和度(配置文件:DisplayP3,目标色彩空间:P3)。
CalMAN饱和度(配置文件:DisplayP3,目标色彩空间:P3)。
CalMAN ColorChecker(配置文件:DisplayP3,目标色彩空间:P3)。
CalMAN ColorChecker(配置文件:DisplayP3,目标色彩空间:P3)。

像往常一样,MyAsus软件中有几个颜色配置文件,其中 "本地 "是默认预设的。在这里,颜色有些过饱和,这应该会在实践中产生一个更强大的图像。最准确的配置文件是DisplayP3,我们也用专业的CalMAN软件(X-Rite i1 Pro 2)进行了测量。基本上,结果已经非常好,在偏色或色温方面没有任何问题,尽管一些个别颜色超过了3的重要偏差。我们无法用自己的校准来纠正这一点,这就是为什么我们在这种特殊情况下不提供配置文件供下载。P3色彩空间是完全覆盖的。

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. P3
vs. P3
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
0.79 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.34 ms rise
↘ 0.45 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.59 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.29 ms rise
↘ 0.3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240 Hz ≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

PWM - 0%的亮度
PWM - 0%的亮度
PWM - 20%的亮度
PWM - 20%的亮度
PWM - 40%的亮度
PWM - 40%的亮度
PWM - 60%的亮度(直流调光)
PWM - 60%的亮度(直流调光)
PWM - 80%的亮度(直流调光)。
PWM - 80%的亮度(直流调光)。
PWM - 100%的亮度(直流调光)。
PWM - 100%的亮度(直流调光)。

直流调光是在100到60%的亮度范围内使用的,而低于这个范围的经典PWM闪烁频率为240Hz。一旦亮度下降到60%以下,就会出现一个警告,即直流调光不再可用。作为一种选择,所谓的无闪烁OLED调光在MyAsus软件中可用,我们在对Zenbook S 13 OLED的评论中对其进行了研究。的确,这是一个有用的补充,但一直要通过软件也是很麻烦的。

在阴凉处
在阴凉处
在阳光下
在阳光下

触摸屏在户外有很强的反射性,所以无论在室内还是室外,你都应该避免来自窗户或光源的反射。这并不容易,尤其是在阳光普照的时候。视角的稳定性总体上是非常好的。只有在非常极端的角度才会出现典型的OLED蓝色偏光。

视角稳定
视角稳定

性能 - 猛禽湖-HX & Ada Lovelace

 
 
 

测试条件

在预装的ProArt Creator Hub中提供了各种能源配置文件,我们在下面的表格中列出了这些配置文件。我们主要在性能 模式下进行了测量和基准测试,但我们也在某些部分看了其他两种模式的效果。

能源概况 CPU负载 GPU负载 压力测试 最大风扇容量
标准 157/80瓦 90瓦 CPU:30瓦
GPU:80瓦
47.6 dB(A)
性能 170/130 瓦 130 瓦 CPU:55瓦
GPU:105瓦
56.7 dB(A)
全速 170/130 瓦 130 瓦 CPU:64 瓦
95 瓦
58.9 dB(A)

处理器 - Core i9-13980HX

英特尔目前用于笔记本的猛禽湖系列的高端型号,Core i9-13980HX ,被用作处理器。这提供了8个快速性能核心和16个效率核心,这就是为什么该芯片能够同时处理总共32个线程。在Studiobook中,该处理器的功耗高达约170瓦,在持续负载几分钟后达到130瓦的水平。在大型游戏笔记本中,CPU的运行速度稍快,但与使用普通英特尔CPU的对比组或Apple M2 Max相比,Studiobook有很大的优势。在单核性能方面,酷睿i9也领先于新的AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX ,但后者在多核测试中提供了更多的性能,同时也更有效地工作。

在远离插座的地方,笔记本电脑的性能能力没有什么可看的,因为CPU在这里只被允许消耗微薄的34/26瓦特。在CB R23多重测试中,它的得分只有11,576分,相当于63%的赤字。因此,StudioBook的电池电量比MacBook Pro 16与其 M2 Max在电池电量方面没有性能下降。更多的CPU基准测试可在 我们的技术部分.

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

02805608401120140016801960224025202800308033603640392042004480476050405320Tooltip
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Core i9-13980HX: Ø4477 (4374.45-4604.05)
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2829 (2772.58-2962.96)
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø1739 (1422.32-2515.18)
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014 Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2950 (2913.75-3025.49)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max Apple M2 Max: Ø2074 (2068.47-2081.27)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX: Ø5385 (5255.55-5554.01)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
83.2 pt
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX
81.4 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
 
80.3 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max -6!
Apple M2 Max
61.3 pt
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H
61.1 pt
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
55.6 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
51.4 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H
50.7 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
34521 (32987.6min - 34521.3max) Points +12%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX
30789 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (28301 - 33052, n=11)
30305 Points -2%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H
20385 Points -34%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
19188 Points -38%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6936 - 30789, n=104, last 2 years)
15647 Points -49%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H
15306 Points -50%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max
14767 Points -52%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX
2110 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (1825 - 2169, n=9)
2081 Points -1%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
1940 Points -8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (878 - 2290, n=95, last 2 years)
1770 Points -16%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
1707 Points -19%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H
1699 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H
1698 Points -20%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max
1625 Points -23%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
13457 Points +14%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX
11768 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (10353 - 12437, n=10)
11540 Points -2%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H
7716 Points -34%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
7254 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H
5926 Points -50%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2681 - 11924, n=88, last 2 years)
5758 Points -51%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max
4044 Points -66%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX
812 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (717 - 825, n=10)
789 Points -3%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
756 Points -7%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H
657 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H
657 Points -19%
Average of class Multimedia
  (341 - 853, n=88, last 2 years)
652 Points -20%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
651 Points -20%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max
460 Points -43%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
5554 (5255.55min - 5554.01max) Points +21%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (4358 - 5172, n=11)
4708 Points +2%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX
4604 (4374.45min - 4604.05max) Points
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H
3025 (2913.75min - 3025.49max) Points -34%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
2963 (2772.58min - 2962.96max) Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H
2515 Points -45%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1252 - 5224, n=95, last 2 years)
2474 Points -46%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max
2074 (2068.47min, 2068.57P1 - 2081.27max) Points -55%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX
308 Points
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
307 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (289 - 312, n=11)
303 Points -2%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H
285 Points -7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (99.6 - 323, n=90, last 2 years)
259 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H
246 Points -20%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
243 Points -21%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max
239 Points -22%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Multimedia
  (100 - 502, n=86, last 2 years)
251 Seconds * -135%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H
221 Seconds * -107%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
172 Seconds * -61%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H
166 Seconds * -55%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (97 - 136, n=10)
109.3 Seconds * -2%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX
107 Seconds *
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
93 Seconds * +13%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
135927 MIPS +13%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX
119900 MIPS
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (104616 - 129804, n=10)
118278 MIPS -1%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H
76501 MIPS -36%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
74386 MIPS -38%
Average of class Multimedia
  (30592 - 130368, n=80, last 2 years)
61096 MIPS -49%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H
60842 MIPS -49%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
7319 MIPS +2%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX
7163 MIPS
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (6230 - 7163, n=10)
6915 MIPS -3%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H
6225 MIPS -13%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3398 - 7545, n=80, last 2 years)
5736 MIPS -20%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
5570 MIPS -22%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H
5510 MIPS -23%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (18475 - 22200, n=10)
20092 Points 0%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX
20053 Points
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
19583 Points -2%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max
15348 Points -23%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
13796 Points -31%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H
13731 Points -32%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4990 - 23059, n=87, last 2 years)
12221 Points -39%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H
11497 Points -43%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX
2137 Points
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
2132 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (1796 - 2139, n=10)
2051 Points -4%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H
2043 Points -4%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max
1978 Points -7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (891 - 2555, n=87, last 2 years)
1833 Points -14%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
1718 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H
1692 Points -21%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
34.8 fps +14%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (27 - 33.4, n=9)
31.1 fps +2%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX
30.5 fps
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H
22.3 fps -27%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
21 fps -31%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H
16.8 fps -45%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.26 - 34.3, n=79, last 2 years)
16.6 fps -46%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
60.4 s * -37%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
57.8 s * -31%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H
51.6 s * -17%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H
49.6 s * -12%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.7 - 146.7, n=82, last 2 years)
49.1 s * -11%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX
44.2 s *
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (35 - 51.4, n=10)
43 s * +3%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
0.4934 sec * -29%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H
0.489 sec * -28%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.3604 - 0.947, n=80, last 2 years)
0.4836 sec * -26%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H
0.4286 sec * -12%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
0.3982 sec * -4%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (0.3793 - 0.4462, n=10)
0.3959 sec * -3%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX
0.3826 sec *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
4604 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
268 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
308 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
11768 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
812 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
2110 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
30789 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
97.5 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
 
96.6 pt
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
71.5 pt
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
70.5 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
57.8 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
57.5 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
27340 KRay/s
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (21332 - 29553, n=9)
26707 KRay/s -2%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
19557 KRay/s -28%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
18385 KRay/s -33%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4906 - 50388, n=77, last 2 years)
14859 KRay/s -46%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
14049 KRay/s -49%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
136048 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (108001 - 148168, n=9)
132982 Points -2%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
95579 Points -30%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
90834 Points -33%
Average of class Multimedia
  (14528 - 201874, n=78, last 2 years)
74258 Points -45%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
69259 Points -49%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
6681 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (5264 - 7142, n=9)
6559 MB/s -2%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
4270 MB/s -36%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
4187 MB/s -37%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1529 - 8623, n=78, last 2 years)
3452 MB/s -48%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
3247 MB/s -51%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (126758 - 143409, n=9)
138011 Points +3%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
134321 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
100136 Points -25%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
97006 Points -28%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
95175 Points -29%
Average of class Multimedia
  (21547 - 181505, n=78, last 2 years)
91840 Points -32%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (13785 - 17117, n=9)
16075 Points +4%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
15484 Points
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
10536 Points -32%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
10485 Points -32%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1240 - 28794, n=78, last 2 years)
9575 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
9065 Points -41%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
68591 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (53398 - 73758, n=9)
66568 Points -3%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
48474 Points -29%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
44967 Points -34%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9903 - 105740, n=77, last 2 years)
37028 Points -46%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
34531 Points -50%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
149377 MB/s +16%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
128312 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (105169 - 136520, n=9)
126745 MB/s -1%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
83357 MB/s -35%
Average of class Multimedia
  (31432 - 169946, n=78, last 2 years)
76583 MB/s -40%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
67264 MB/s -48%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1901 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (1513 - 2039, n=9)
1894 MB/s 0%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
1198 MB/s -37%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1192 MB/s -37%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
997 MB/s -48%
Average of class Multimedia
  (454 - 2022, n=78, last 2 years)
948 MB/s -50%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (11431 - 16325, n=9)
14483 KRay/s +2%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
14155 KRay/s
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
10716 KRay/s -24%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
9803 KRay/s -31%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2738 - 26875, n=78, last 2 years)
8058 KRay/s -43%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
7496 KRay/s -47%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
50488 MPixel/s +2%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
49474 MPixel/s
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
48148 MPixel/s -3%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (37069 - 52949, n=9)
46025 MPixel/s -7%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
44611 MPixel/s -10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (7419 - 53918, n=78, last 2 years)
40717 MPixel/s -18%

系统性能

无论是在合成基准还是在实践中,系统性能都非常好。在测试中也没有遇到任何问题。

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
9151 Points +22%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
8058 Points +8%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
7491 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  ()
7491 Points 0%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7486 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
6822 Points -9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4542 - 8670, n=73, last 2 years)
6810 Points -9%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
12176 Points +11%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
11332 Points +4%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
10928 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  ()
10928 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
10544 Points -4%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8480 - 12420, n=73, last 2 years)
10526 Points -4%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10215 Points -7%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
11833 Points +20%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10040 Points +2%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
9886 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  ()
9886 Points 0%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
9231 Points -7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6089 - 10742, n=73, last 2 years)
8939 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
8578 Points -13%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
14432 Points +37%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
13575 Points +29%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
11100 Points +5%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
10558 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  ()
10558 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
9527 Points -10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3651 - 13548, n=73, last 2 years)
9249 Points -12%
CrossMark / Overall
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
2114 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  ()
2114 Points 0%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
2078 Points -2%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
M2 Max 38-Core GPU, M2 Max, Apple SSD AP2048Z
1910 Points -10%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1882 Points -11%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1745 Points -17%
Average of class Multimedia
  (978 - 2255, n=91, last 2 years)
1722 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1569 Points -26%
CrossMark / Productivity
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
1950 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  ()
1950 Points 0%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1946 Points 0%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1781 Points -9%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1632 Points -16%
Average of class Multimedia
  (913 - 2064, n=91, last 2 years)
1631 Points -16%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
M2 Max 38-Core GPU, M2 Max, Apple SSD AP2048Z
1618 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1479 Points -24%
CrossMark / Creativity
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
M2 Max 38-Core GPU, M2 Max, Apple SSD AP2048Z
2505 Points +4%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
2414 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  ()
2414 Points 0%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
2377 Points -2%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1978 Points -18%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1948 Points -19%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1054 - 2795, n=91, last 2 years)
1937 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1691 Points -30%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1915 Points +6%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
1811 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  ()
1811 Points 0%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1689 Points -7%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1533 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1495 Points -17%
Average of class Multimedia
  (869 - 2171, n=91, last 2 years)
1444 Points -20%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
M2 Max 38-Core GPU, M2 Max, Apple SSD AP2048Z
1395 Points -23%
PCMark 10 Score
7491 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
74320 MB/s
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
73907 MB/s -1%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
71912 MB/s -3%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (62189 - 80776, n=9)
71190 MB/s -4%
Average of class Multimedia
  (20549 - 104459, n=78, last 2 years)
68844 MB/s -7%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
66344 MB/s -11%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
77376 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (62624 - 89096, n=9)
76728 MB/s -1%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
75425 MB/s -3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (22917 - 125604, n=78, last 2 years)
70015 MB/s -10%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
69534 MB/s -10%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
68252 MB/s -12%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
88988 MB/s +24%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
73602 MB/s +3%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
71784 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (20226 - 117933, n=78, last 2 years)
70169 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (59912 - 79917, n=9)
69396 MB/s -3%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
68170 MB/s -5%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average of class Multimedia
  (7 - 346, n=78, last 2 years)
106.7 ns * -25%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
97.5 ns * -14%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
94.4 ns * -10%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
90.6 ns * -6%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (79.4 - 93.2, n=9)
87.5 ns * -2%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
85.6 ns *

* ... smaller is better

DPC延时

Studiobook不是特别适合于实时音频应用。在我们的标准化延迟测试中,目前的BIOS版本下出现了高延迟。

LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
5418.4 μs * -168%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4545.9 μs * -124%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2750 μs * -36%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
2025.1 μs *
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1053.8 μs * +48%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

第二个M.2 2880插槽
第二个M.2 2880插槽

在我们的测试设备中使用了Phison的快速PCIe 4.0 SSD,它提供了4TB的巨大存储容量。其中,3.63TB在第一次启动后仍然可用。该驱动器的速度非常快,传输率超过7GB/s,最重要的是,即使在永久负载下,性能也可以持续保持。这决不是标准。此外,Studiobook 16还提供另一个M.2 2280插槽,它也是通过快速的PCIe 4.0接口连接的。更多的SSD基准测试被列在这里.

Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7071 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 6274 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 588 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 572 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 70.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 181 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 579 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1112 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
84 pt
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
76.1 pt
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
75.8 pt
Average Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
 
75.8 pt
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
71.5 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
71.2 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
57.4 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
3687 (3440.34min - 3686.58max) MB/s
Average Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
  ()
3687 MB/s 0%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3482 (3374.87min - 3481.9max) MB/s -6%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3005 (2951.71min - 3004.87max) MB/s -18%
Average of class Multimedia
  (888 - 4861, n=77, last 2 years)
2951 MB/s -20%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
2756 (2741.19min - 2756.29max) MB/s -25%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2519 MB/s -32%
seq write
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
4250 (4204.35min - 4249.88max) MB/s +12%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
3783 MB/s
Average Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
  ()
3783 MB/s 0%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3546 (3447.32min - 3545.9max) MB/s -6%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3530 (3501.32min - 3530max) MB/s -7%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3291 (3216.4min - 3290.77max) MB/s -13%
Average of class Multimedia
  (463 - 5711, n=77, last 2 years)
3097 MB/s -18%
seq q8 t1 read
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
7048 (6068.56min - 7047.9max) MB/s 0%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
7020 (6541.02min - 7019.8max) MB/s
Average Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
  ()
7020 MB/s 0%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
6935 (5510.15min - 6934.86max) MB/s -1%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
6601 (5818.24min - 6601.01max) MB/s -6%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
6546 MB/s -7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (944 - 7126, n=77, last 2 years)
5406 MB/s -23%
seq q8 t1 write
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
6454 (6410.36min - 6454.19max) MB/s
Average Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
  ()
6454 MB/s 0%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
6004 (5933.65min - 6004.3max) MB/s -7%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4934 (4868.24min - 4934.38max) MB/s -24%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
4926 (4833.5min - 4926max) MB/s -24%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4886 (4877.24min - 4885.61max) MB/s -24%
Average of class Multimedia
  (555 - 6898, n=77, last 2 years)
4152 MB/s -36%
4k q1 t1 read
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
77.2 (76.37min - 77.18max) MB/s +9%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
71.1 (70.39min - 71.1max) MB/s
Average Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
  ()
71.1 MB/s 0%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
66.9 (50.9min - 66.86max) MB/s -6%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
64.3 (63.09min - 64.34max) MB/s -10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (14.6 - 97.7, n=77, last 2 years)
63.5 MB/s -11%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
53.1 (52.47min - 53.13max) MB/s -25%
4k q1 t1 write
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
313 (306.34min - 313.21max) MB/s +71%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
236 (234.84min - 236.4max) MB/s +29%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
214 (213.09min - 214.01max) MB/s +17%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
183.3 (141.67min - 183.25max) MB/s
Average Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
  ()
183.3 MB/s 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (69.4 - 378, n=77, last 2 years)
172.4 MB/s -6%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
164.3 (163.26min - 164.34max) MB/s -10%
4k q32 t16 read
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4040 (4004.73min - 4039.52max) MB/s +482%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3523 (3416.03min - 3522.69max) MB/s +408%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2518 (2508.69min - 2518.06max) MB/s +263%
Average of class Multimedia
  (295 - 4881, n=77, last 2 years)
1400 MB/s +102%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1158 (1132.18min - 1157.71max) MB/s +67%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
694 (677.77min - 693.63max) MB/s
Average Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
  ()
694 MB/s 0%
4k q32 t16 write
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3597 (3488.54min - 3597.4max) MB/s +545%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3539 (3520.81min - 3538.51max) MB/s +534%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2002 (1558.72min - 2002.2max) MB/s +259%
Average of class Multimedia
  (192.1 - 4074, n=77, last 2 years)
1056 MB/s +89%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
558 (516.09min - 558.29max) MB/s
Average Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
  ()
558 MB/s 0%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
481 (462.66min - 481.19max) MB/s -14%
AS SSD
Score Total
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8046 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
7141 Points +1%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
7095 Points
Average Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
  ()
7095 Points 0%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
6435 Points -9%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
5636 Points -21%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2033 - 9972, n=74, last 2 years)
5065 Points -29%
Score Read
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2979 Points +90%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2447 Points +56%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1805 Points +15%
Average of class Multimedia
  (669 - 3501, n=74, last 2 years)
1637 Points +4%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
1570 Points
Average Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
  ()
1570 Points 0%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1554 Points -1%
Score Write
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
4813 Points
Average Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
  ()
4813 Points 0%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
4164 Points -13%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3543 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3504 Points -27%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3012 Points -37%
Average of class Multimedia
  (656 - 4813, n=74, last 2 years)
2651 Points -45%
Seq Read
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
5689 MB/s +6%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
5350 MB/s
Average Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
  ()
5350 MB/s 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4685.43 MB/s -12%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
4582 MB/s -14%
Average of class Multimedia
  (837 - 5730, n=74, last 2 years)
4211 MB/s -21%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3634 MB/s -32%
Seq Write
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
3904 MB/s +24%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3608 MB/s +15%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3440.79 MB/s +10%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
3138 MB/s
Average Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
  ()
3138 MB/s 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (414 - 5651, n=74, last 2 years)
2764 MB/s -12%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2310 MB/s -26%
4K Read
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
74.1 MB/s
Average Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
  ()
74.1 MB/s 0%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
72.4 MB/s -2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (28.7 - 98.5, n=74, last 2 years)
62 MB/s -16%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
61.3 MB/s -17%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
59.2 MB/s -20%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
57.42 MB/s -23%
4K Write
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
288 MB/s +23%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
235 MB/s
Average Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
  ()
235 MB/s 0%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
203.1 MB/s -14%
Average of class Multimedia
  (66.5 - 328, n=74, last 2 years)
190.1 MB/s -19%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
189.7 MB/s -19%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
186.47 MB/s -21%
4K-64 Read
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2543 MB/s +165%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1920.85 MB/s +100%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1285 MB/s +34%
Average of class Multimedia
  (350 - 2989, n=74, last 2 years)
1154 MB/s +20%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
961 MB/s
Average Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
  ()
961 MB/s 0%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
925 MB/s -4%
4K-64 Write
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
4265 MB/s
Average Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
  ()
4265 MB/s 0%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
3584 MB/s -16%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2979 MB/s -30%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2973.32 MB/s -30%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2493 MB/s -42%
Average of class Multimedia
  (411 - 4265, n=74, last 2 years)
2184 MB/s -49%
Access Time Read
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
0.079 ms * -119%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.018 - 0.15, n=74, last 2 years)
0.05485 ms * -52%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.048 ms * -33%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
0.041 ms * -14%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
0.036 ms *
Average Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
  ()
0.036 ms * -0%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
0.029 ms * +19%
Access Time Write
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.013 - 0.414, n=74, last 2 years)
0.06045 ms * -365%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
0.023 ms * -77%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
0.021 ms * -62%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.02 ms * -54%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
0.013 ms * -0%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
0.013 ms *
Average Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
  ()
0.013 ms * -0%

* ... smaller is better

Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

035571010651420177521302485284031953550390542604615497053255680603563906745Tooltip
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604: Ø6965 (6265.82-7020.84)

图形

GPU-Z Nvidia
GPU-Z Nvidia
GPU-Z 英特尔
GPU-Z 英特尔

除了处理器的集成GPU (UHD Graphics),还安装了快速的NvidiaGeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑。图形切换是通过Optimus完成的,但没有高级Optimus或MUX开关。由于最大TGP为130瓦,这是最快的4070笔记本电脑型号之一,但这个数字有点误导。正如我们在对新的移动GPU的第一次审查中所看到的,在FurMark等合成测试中可以达到这个数值,但游戏被限制在105-110瓦左右,因为GPU在这里达到最大时钟。

在基准测试中,RTX 4070处于预期水平,落后于RTX 4080 Laptop4090笔记本电脑与旧的 Studiobook 16与它的RTX 3070 Ti、7-15%的领先优势并不是很大,所以在这里升级并不值得。GPU性能在永久负载下保持稳定,但在电池模式下的性能要低40%左右(最大TGP 40瓦)。更多的GPU基准测试可以在这里找到https://www.notebookcheck.net/Mobile-Graphics-Cards-Benchmark-List.844.0.html.

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
62240 Points +54%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
47145 Points +17%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
41480 Points +3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (24229 - 46434, n=64)
40454 Points 0%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
40331 Points
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
36855 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
36220 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
22469 Points -44%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3505 - 60250, n=79, last 2 years)
20784 Points -48%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
47798 Points +67%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
36282 Points +26%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (12242 - 33451, n=68)
29100 Points +1%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
28885 Points +1%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
28700 Points
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
27271 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
26769 Points -7%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
26715 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
16174 Points -44%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1835 - 46022, n=82, last 2 years)
14939 Points -48%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
20033 Points +71%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
15051 Points +28%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
11798 Points +1%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
11730 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (5012 - 13391, n=66)
11617 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
10429 Points -11%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
10307 Points -12%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
10236 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
5859 Points -50%
Average of class Multimedia
  (622 - 17620, n=83, last 2 years)
5648 Points -52%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
40668 Points +80%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU, Apple M2 Max
25103 Points +11%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
22642 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (17684 - 24275, n=9)
21668 Points -4%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
21339 Points -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1993 - 37434, n=43, last 2 years)
13943 Points -38%
Geekbench 5.5 - OpenCL Score
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
146413 Points +22%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
120093 Points
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
117970 Points -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (17391 - 132836, n=65)
114214 Points -5%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
112071 Points -7%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
111799 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
106180 Points -12%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU, Apple M2 Max
71726 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
71151 Points -41%
Average of class Multimedia
  (10769 - 132836, n=87, last 2 years)
61263 Points -49%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
6841 Points -94%
V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10 - GPU
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
1230 mpaths +107%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
812 mpaths +36%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
638 mpaths +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (434 - 686, n=49)
603 mpaths +1%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
595 mpaths
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
563 mpaths -5%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
419 mpaths -30%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
404 mpaths -32%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
362 mpaths -39%
Average of class Multimedia
  (45 - 684, n=65, last 2 years)
281 mpaths -53%
V-Ray 5 Benchmark
GPU CUDA
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
1695 mpaths +45%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (120 - 1356, n=37)
1195 mpaths +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
1189 mpaths +2%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
1167 mpaths
Average of class Multimedia
  (274 - 1259, n=22, last 2 years)
892 mpaths -24%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
858 mpaths -26%
GPU RTX
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
2272 mpaths +41%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
1744 mpaths +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (171 - 1872, n=37)
1650 mpaths +3%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
1607 mpaths
Average of class Multimedia
  (391 - 1751, n=22, last 2 years)
1352 mpaths -16%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
1123 mpaths -30%
SPECviewperf 13
Solidworks (sw-04)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
140.08 fps +28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (109.6 - 116.4, n=4)
113.9 fps +4%
Average of class Multimedia
  (109.6 - 116.4, n=2, last 2 years)
113 fps +3%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
109.63 fps
Siemens NX (snx-03)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
31.45 fps +38%
Average of class Multimedia
  (22.8 - 23.6, n=2, last 2 years)
23.2 fps +2%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
22.75 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (20.7 - 23.6, n=4)
22.5 fps -1%
Showcase (showcase-02)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
230.78 fps +108%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (111.2 - 122.2, n=4)
116.1 fps +4%
Average of class Multimedia
  (111.2 - 114, n=2, last 2 years)
112.6 fps +1%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
111.17 fps
Medical (medical-02)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
120.28 fps +62%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (74.4 - 80.1, n=4)
78 fps +5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (74.4 - 79.7, n=2, last 2 years)
77 fps +4%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
74.35 fps
Maya (maya-05)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
494.02 fps +55%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (319 - 356, n=4)
339 fps +6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (319 - 344, n=2, last 2 years)
332 fps +4%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
319.16 fps
Energy (energy-02)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
70.56 fps +68%
Average of class Multimedia
  (42.1 - 45.5, n=2, last 2 years)
43.8 fps +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (41 - 45.5, n=4)
42.6 fps +1%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
42.07 fps
Creo (creo-02)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
377.82 fps +57%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (241 - 264, n=4)
254 fps +5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (241 - 264, n=2, last 2 years)
253 fps +5%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
241.03 fps
Catia (catia-05)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
266.33 fps +77%
Average of class Multimedia
  (150.2 - 171.8, n=2, last 2 years)
161 fps +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (150.2 - 171.8, n=4)
158.7 fps +6%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
150.22 fps
3ds Max (3dsmax-06)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
338.22 fps +57%
Average of class Multimedia
  (216 - 266, n=2, last 2 years)
241 fps +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (216 - 266, n=4)
240 fps +11%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
215.97 fps
SPECviewperf 2020
1920x1080 Solidworks (solidworks-05)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
426.16 fps +71%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (250 - 271, n=6)
260 fps +4%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
249.69 fps
Average of class Multimedia
  (93.1 - 270, n=3, last 2 years)
204 fps -18%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
199.4 fps -20%
1920x1080 Siemens NX (snx-04)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
309.1 fps +1273%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
31.26 fps +39%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (21.4 - 25.5, n=9)
23.3 fps +3%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
22.52 fps
Average of class Multimedia
  (2.54 - 23.6, n=3, last 2 years)
16.2 fps -28%
1920x1080 Medical (medical-03)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
58.7 fps +69%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
55.09 fps +59%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (32.2 - 39, n=9)
35.8 fps +3%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
34.67 fps
Average of class Multimedia
  (24.6 - 36.1, n=3, last 2 years)
31.8 fps -8%
1920x1080 Maya (maya-06)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (355 - 472, n=8)
408 fps +12%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
363.61 fps
Average of class Multimedia
  (223 - 364, n=2, last 2 years)
293 fps -19%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
290 fps -20%
1920x1080 Energy (energy-03)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
70.65 fps +68%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
67.9 fps +62%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (41.3 - 45.7, n=9)
42.6 fps +2%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
41.97 fps
Average of class Multimedia
  (14.1 - 45.7, n=3, last 2 years)
33.9 fps -19%
1920x1080 Creo (creo-03)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
139.7 fps +24%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
113.27 fps 0%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
112.95 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (95.9 - 122, n=9)
112 fps -1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (57 - 113, n=3, last 2 years)
90.3 fps -20%
1920x1080 CATIA (catia-06)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
98.8 fps +56%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (61.4 - 70.2, n=9)
66 fps +4%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
63.45 fps
Average of class Multimedia
  (20.7 - 65.9, n=3, last 2 years)
50 fps -21%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
17.84 fps -72%
1920x1080 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
206.67 fps +113%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
123.1 fps +27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (95.3 - 102, n=9)
98.8 fps +2%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
96.87 fps
Average of class Multimedia
  (47.5 - 100.8, n=3, last 2 years)
81.7 fps -16%
3DMark 11 Performance
35000 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
25949 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
12384 points
Help
Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Average of class Multimedia
  (19 - 105, n=47, last 2 years)
41.4 Seconds * -88%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
34 Seconds * -55%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
30 Seconds * -36%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
24 Seconds * -9%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
22 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (18 - 30, n=65)
21.5 Seconds * +2%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
21 Seconds * +5%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
20 Seconds * +9%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
13 Seconds * +41%
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average of class Multimedia
  (32 - 181, n=48, last 2 years)
72.3 Seconds * -101%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
61 Seconds * -69%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
46 Seconds * -28%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
44 Seconds * -22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (32 - 181, n=67)
40.2 Seconds * -12%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
36 Seconds *
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
34 Seconds * +6%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
27 Seconds * +25%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
20 Seconds * +44%
Blender / v3.3 Classroom METAL
Average of class Multimedia
  (17.8 - 132, n=10, last 2 years)
67.5 Seconds *
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU, Apple M2 Max
51.2 Seconds *
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Average of class Multimedia
  (160 - 946, n=88, last 2 years)
421 Seconds * -122%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
386 Seconds * -103%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU, Apple M2 Max
326 Seconds * -72%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
304 Seconds * -60%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (158 - 440, n=64)
289 Seconds * -52%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
285 Seconds * -50%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
279 Seconds * -47%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
263 Seconds * -38%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
190 Seconds *
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
147 Seconds * +23%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

Studiobook 16的游戏性能非常好,即使是现代作品也可以在QHD分辨率下播放,没有问题。只有光线追踪通常需要升频才能流畅地播放。这里的一个很好的例子是《赛博朋克2077》,在光线追踪超预设下只能达到26FPS,但在DLSS(包括帧生成)下,这就变成了84FPS。当然,速度的提高会因题目的不同而不同,赛博朋克是DLSS的一个旗舰题目。在较长的会议期间,游戏性能保持稳定,但与旧的工作室本相比,其总体优势是 RTX 3070 Ti的整体优势是最小的。

Performance Rating - Percent
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
98.3 pt
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
81.5 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) -1!
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
79 pt
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
76.3 pt
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
75.8 pt
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
73.3 pt
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
57.3 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
41.4 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
39.3 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
178.6 (172min, 173P1) fps +67%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
159.7 fps +49%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
145 fps +35%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
116 (48.5P0.1, 82.5P1) fps +8%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
107.1 (95min, 103P1) fps
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
105.6 (95min, 95.44P1) fps -1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
89.9 (87min, 88P1) fps -16%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
60.1 (51min) fps -44%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years)
54.6 fps -49%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
134 (7.27min, 90.9P1) fps +9%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
123.2 (3.96min, 76.9P1) fps 0%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
123 (8.87min, 83.3P1) fps
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
122.7 (6.05min, 66.7P1) fps 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
122.2 (8.62min, 83.3P1) fps -1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
107.2 (3.65min, 71.4P1) fps -13%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
85.8 (21.2min, 52.6P1) fps -30%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
65.3 (21.8min, 35.7P1) fps -47%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.09 - 141.6, n=82, last 2 years)
55.1 fps -55%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
169.6 fps +48%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
134 fps +17%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
116.2 fps +1%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
114.7 fps
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
106.9 fps -7%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
91.8 fps -20%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
56.9 fps -50%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.53 - 141.8, n=83, last 2 years)
52.8 fps -54%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
333 (38min, 227P1) fps +133%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
269 (35.8min, 193.4P1) fps +89%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
204 (39min, 153.9P1) fps +43%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
183.8 (60.2min, 134.8P1) fps +29%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
183.3 (43.8min, 135P1) fps +28%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
160 (89.3min, 114P1) fps +12%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
142.7 (37.9min, 70.5P1) fps
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
103.9 (65min, 77.7P1) fps -27%
Average of class Multimedia
  (11 - 233, n=82, last 2 years)
91.4 fps -36%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
179.7 (153.7min) fps +5%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
171.6 (147.3min) fps
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
159.2 (138.2min) fps -7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
154.3 (130.7min) fps -10%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
144.5 (123.6min) fps -16%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
136.2 (111min) fps -21%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
117 (97min) fps -32%
Average of class Multimedia
  (26.3 - 179.9, n=84, last 2 years)
97.3 fps -43%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
73.5 (63.9min) fps -57%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
131.1 fps
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
117.8 fps -10%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
115.3 fps -12%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
111 fps -15%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
108.4 fps -17%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
106.1 fps -19%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
81.6 fps -38%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
79 fps -40%
Average of class Multimedia
  (23 - 141.1, n=84, last 2 years)
67.4 fps -49%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
178.6 (172min, 173P1) fps +67%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
159.7 fps +49%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
145 fps +35%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
116 (48.5P0.1, 82.5P1) fps +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (69.8 - 133.7, n=56)
112.5 fps +5%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
107.1 (95min, 103P1) fps
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
105.6 (95min, 95.44P1) fps -1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
89.9 (87min, 88P1) fps -16%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max, Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU
76 fps -29%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
60.1 (51min) fps -44%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years)
54.6 fps -49%
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
130.6 (34.83min) fps +50%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
94.9 (33.7min) fps +9%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (48 - 110, n=24)
85.4 fps -2%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
84.75 (28.94min) fps -3%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
81.3 (28.3min) fps -7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
80.6 (38.91min) fps -7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9.2 - 103, n=27, last 2 years)
51.4 fps -41%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
44.4 (15.3min) fps -49%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
86 fps +59%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
63.39 (27.74min) fps +17%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
54 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (30 - 63.9, n=24)
53.4 fps -1%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
53.28 (28.06min) fps -1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
51 (41.5min) fps -6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
48.56 (11.82min) fps -10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (15.6 - 89, n=17, last 2 years)
43.4 fps -20%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
27.2 (22.1min) fps -50%
Far Cry 5
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
149 fps +3%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
145 fps
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
137 (118min) fps -6%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
136 (105min) fps -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (92 - 158, n=36)
127.3 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
71 (47min) fps -51%
Average of class Multimedia
  (17 - 145, n=59, last 2 years)
69.5 fps -52%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
60 fps -59%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
117 fps
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
116 (88min) fps -1%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
115 fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (79 - 128, n=33)
108.9 fps -7%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
104 (89min) fps -11%
Average of class Multimedia
  (26 - 117, n=31, last 2 years)
72.6 fps -38%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
58 fps -50%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
56 (46min) fps -52%
CPU/GPU数据Witcher 3 (Ultra设置)
CPU/GPU数据Witcher 3 (Ultra设置)

Witcher 3 FPS Chart

0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø107.1 (95-113)
lowmed.highultraQHD
GTA V (2015) 183.4 179 123 94.5
The Witcher 3 (2015) 249 107.1
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 215 192.8 184.4 171.6
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 162.4 114.7 85.2
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 181.6 164.3 131.1
Far Cry 5 (2018) 187 162 154 145 117
Strange Brigade (2018) 315 162.1 150.6 142.7 95.3
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 153 103
F1 2021 (2021) 441 336 264 149.8 110.9
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) 129 113 96 87 54
F1 22 (2022) 138.5 133.8 111.2 59.4 42.4
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 (2022) 102 72

排放 - 大声点,大声点,学习书

噪声

这两个风扇在日常工作中通常保持安静,但一旦CPU或GPU受到压力,就会迅速变大。我们在下面的表格中列出了数值,但我们一般建议在游戏时使用耳机或耳麦。你可以跳过这里的全速 模式,因为它只会变得更响,而且没有性能优势。没有检测到其他电子噪音,如线圈啸叫等

能源概况 3DMark 06 Witcher 3 Cyberpoint 2077 压力测试
默认 43.6dB(A) 43.6dB(A) 47.6dB(A) 47.6dB(A)
性能 43.6dB(A) 43.6dB(A) 47.6dB(A) 47.6dB(A)
全速 58.9dB(A) 58.9dB(A) 58.9dB(A) 58.9dB(A)

Noise Level

Idle
24.5 / 24.5 / 24.5 dB(A)
Load
47.6 / 56.7 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24.5 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.542.239.736.834.435.62534.538.933.138.932.5313132.436.331.429.726.826.44032.637.432.629.52827.65029.337.129.327.426.625.56328.830.829.5282324.78032.232.626.223.719.620.410033.231.824.121.920.618.612533.331.228.824.919.21816031.830.727.123.81817.62003534.528.526.217.718.325036.936.633.629.319.921315383832.228.316.616.840039.74032.129.315.215.150041.34233.631.415.514.463041.140.932.830.213.512.680043.24234.33113.112.3100044.643.636.432.311.712125045.745.437.633.21111.9160047.946.938.434.810.912.1200046.645.937.433.210.912.7250046.645.137.232.610.911.9315044.443.436.331.811.212.2400045.243.835.130.911.712.4500044.143.334.431.111.912.5630042.642.433.629.112.312.7800042.642.53126.612.312.81000040.539.72721.912.212.61250037.436.323.11812.112.51600034.934.21916.811.412.6SPL56.755.947.643.624.525N11.310.86.14.50.60.7median 41.3median 42median 33.6median 29.3median 12.3median 12.6Delta4.64.543.82.71.8hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
M2 Max 38-Core GPU, M2 Max, Apple SSD AP2048Z
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
Noise
-3%
6%
9%
13%
-9%
off / environment *
24.5
23
6%
25
-2%
24
2%
23.9
2%
23.9
2%
Idle Minimum *
24.5
23
6%
26
-6%
24
2%
23.9
2%
23.9
2%
Idle Average *
24.5
23
6%
27
-10%
24
2%
23.9
2%
32.9
-34%
Idle Maximum *
24.5
33.64
-37%
28
-14%
24
2%
23.9
2%
36.5
-49%
Load Average *
47.6
51.49
-8%
40
16%
34.49
28%
36.6
23%
42.9
10%
Witcher 3 ultra *
55.9
55.27
1%
39
30%
48.29
14%
35.1
37%
51.2
8%
Load Maximum *
56.7
55.24
3%
41
28%
49.66
12%
43.2
24%
56
1%

* ... smaller is better

温度

表面温度总体上没有问题,但笔记本电脑的强大组件很快就能感觉到,即使在空闲状态下也是如此。由于这里的风扇没有运行,我们测得的温度超过了30℃。在负载情况下,基本单元的上侧仍然相当舒适,最高温度为45℃,打字时没有任何限制。底部一侧的中心温度最高达到48℃以下,这就是为什么理论上你可以把设备放在腿上(但考虑到其尺寸,这不太可能)。

在压力测试中,这两个组件很快趋于平缓,据此,显卡被系统优先考虑,以大约105瓦的功率工作,而处理器仍然是~55瓦的功率。在压力测试后没有直接出现性能下降。

CPU/GPU数据压力测试
CPU/GPU数据压力测试
Max. Load
 39.2 °C44.1 °C38.8 °C 
 36.2 °C39.8 °C34.1 °C 
 32.1 °C30.4 °C30.5 °C 
Maximum: 44.1 °C
Average: 36.1 °C
47.6 °C48 °C47.9 °C
40.4 °C45.2 °C40.6 °C
33.5 °C34.2 °C32.1 °C
Maximum: 48 °C
Average: 41.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  47.5 °C | Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.3 °C / 90.1 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-3.5 °C / -6.3 F).
表面温度应力测试(顶部)
表面温度应力测试(顶部)
表面温度应力测试(底)。
表面温度应力测试(底)。
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max, Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Heat
18%
18%
-1%
20%
7%
Maximum Upper Side *
44.1
41
7%
41
7%
47
-7%
44.2
-0%
44.2
-0%
Maximum Bottom *
48
47
2%
44
8%
54
-13%
42.9
11%
46.8
2%
Idle Upper Side *
32.7
23
30%
23
30%
30
8%
22.4
31%
29.2
11%
Idle Bottom *
34.9
23
34%
26
26%
32
8%
22.3
36%
30.2
13%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

音响系统由四个扬声器组成,提供良好的音质。虽然还不足以与 MacBook Pro 16,因为它仍然缺乏一点压力,但总体上还是令人满意的。对于视频和一些背景音乐来说,性能是足够的,反正在游戏过程中,由于风扇很大,你从扬声器中听不到什么。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.442.52532.538.43126.836.4402840.85026.632.5632334.18019.635.210020.639.212519.245.81601851.620017.758.725019.965.231516.667.540015.267.950015.566.663013.570.180013.171.2100011.768.812501166.5160010.971.1200010.972.5250010.971.3315011.268.8400011.772.6500011.971.2630012.373800012.3761000012.277.81250012.173.41600011.465.2SPL24.584N0.662.6median 12.3median 68.8Delta2.74.328.728.427.529.2242528.33625.935.521.750.218.554.123.664.11766.815.868.719.172.816.673.716.675.210.573.712.573.511.773.29.674.910.274.310.175.710.475.310.576.411.176.211.574.211.972.212.370.912.470.412.570.512.669.312.568.211.867.423.986.10.573.8median 12.3median 73.52.52.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 电池寿命短的StudioBook

消耗功率

240瓦的电源
240瓦的电源

由于大型OLED面板和HX处理器的单独使用,Studiobook 16的效率不是特别好。我们测量了空闲时的功率为12-21瓦,这取决于亮度,尽管在HDR模式下偶尔会达到36瓦。在负载情况下,没有任何惊喜:在游戏过程中上升到200瓦左右,在压力测试中最初的247瓦之后,平息在210瓦左右。因此,附带的240瓦电源的尺寸是足够的。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.24 / 0.54 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 12.8 / 19.9 / 20.3 Watt
Load midlight 131.4 / 246.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Phison EM2804TBMTCB47, OLED, 3200x2000, 16"
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10, OLED, 3840x2400, 16"
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, AMOLED, 2880x1800, 16"
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, Mini LED, 3840x2160, 17.3"
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
M2 Max, M2 Max 38-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP2048Z, Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.2"
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N, MiniLED, 2560x1600, 16"
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
 
Average of class Multimedia
 
Power Consumption
18%
61%
10%
34%
-35%
5%
44%
Idle Minimum *
12.8
11.8
8%
3
77%
13.9
-9%
5.2
59%
19.2
-50%
Idle Average *
19.9
16.1
19%
5
75%
20
-1%
16.5
17%
29.7
-49%
Idle Maximum *
20.3
17
16%
11
46%
20.6
-1%
16.8
17%
30.8
-52%
24.5 ?(9 - 55.4, n=54)
-21%
Load Average *
131.4
100.6
23%
72
45%
77
41%
113
14%
126
4%
Witcher 3 ultra *
196.5
158
20%
69.7
65%
162
18%
92
53%
258
-31%
Load Maximum *
246.8
192
22%
108
56%
216
12%
145
41%
330
-34%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240Tooltip
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø196.5 (178-212)
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø213 (195.3-247)
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø18.4 (12.9-25.5)

Power consumption with an external monitor

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225Tooltip
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø195 (94.6-239)
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø225 (212-230)
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø83.2 (78.4-93.6)
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø228 (221-240)
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø195.7 (185.7-202)
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø193.5 (178.3-205)
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø21.3 (12.6-35.5)

电池寿命

从消耗率来看,尽管有90Wh的电池,但电池寿命不是特别好,这一点也不奇怪。默认情况下,一旦你拔掉插头,笔记本就会切换到60Hz模式。尽管如此,我们在150cd/m²的WLAN测试中只记录了5.5小时(120Hz:5小时),在全亮度下大约4.5小时(120Hz:~3.5小时)。视频测试仅运行了不到6小时。全亮度下的HDR视频在~2:40小时后耗尽了电池,尽管性能降低,但在负载下约为1小时。

HDR视频运行时间
HDR视频运行时间
充电曲线
充电曲线
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 114)
5h 34min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 114)
4h 38min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5h 58min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 05min
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 88 Wh
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
M2 Max, M2 Max 38-Core GPU, 99.6 Wh
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Average of class Multimedia
 
Battery Runtime
50%
86%
15%
127%
-26%
92%
H.264
358
442
23%
803
124%
334
-7%
1124
214%
230
-36%
WiFi v1.3
334
448
34%
576
72%
336
1%
887
166%
238
-29%
Load
65
126
94%
106
63%
98
51%
66
2%
57
-12%
Witcher 3 ultra
155

Pros

+ 稳定的外壳
+ 非常高的CPU性能
+ 非常好的系统性能
+ 具有良好画质的120Hz OLED
+ 针对PWM闪烁的软件解决方案
+ 良好的输入设备和一个额外的拨号板
+ 2x SO DIMM & 2x PCIe 4.0 SSD

Cons

- 在明亮的表面上,OLED的图像印象略有颗粒感
- 非常响亮的风扇
- 在电池模式下性能大幅下降(尤其是CPU)
- 电池寿命短
- PWM(如果你使用正常的Windows亮度控制)。
- 有限的HDR功能

结论 - Studiobook 16在细节方面存在弱点

在审查中:华硕ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED。测试设备由华硕德国提供。
在审查中:华硕ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED。测试设备由华硕德国提供。

新的2023 ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED提供了很多性能,总体来说是一款适合创意用户的笔记本电脑,尽管在细节上有一些弱点。首先是 酷睿i9-13980HX作为英特尔最快的移动处理器,提供了大量的CPU能力,但仍然落后于 AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX在多核性能和效率方面仍然落后。相比之下 酷睿i9-12900H另一方面,它提供了相当多的性能。然而,这并不适用于显卡,因为 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑只比 RTX 3070 Ti,所以在这里升级并不真正值得。其他批评点包括传统的冷却方式,特别是风扇的噪音,因为设备很快就会变得很吵。至少温度保持在限制范围内。

OLED显示屏已经从60赫兹的4K面板变为120赫兹的触摸屏,分辨率略低。从根本上说,画质非常好,但像华硕的其他OLED触摸屏一样,明亮的地方出现轻微的颗粒感。还有轻微的颜色偏差,我们无法通过自己的校准来纠正。OLED屏幕也对电池寿命产生了负面影响。针对PWM闪烁的软件功能很好,但每次都必须通过软件进行调整,这很麻烦。

功率大,但风扇也很吵:ProArt Studiobook 16无疑是一个快速的设备,DialPad可能为创意用户增加价值。然而,120赫兹的OLED并不完全令人信服。

除了触摸屏,Studiobook 16再次提供了额外的DialPad,它与Adobe应用程序配合得特别好,在这里也能提供附加价值。HDR功能仍然有限,但这是由于Windows的原因。HDR必须手动激活,然后颜色配置文件不再可用。此外,在最大亮度方面,迷你LED面板有优势。虽然 MacBook Pro 16提供的CPU性能明显较低(至少在主电源操作中),但它仍然是创意用户的一个非常好的选择,并在日常使用中提供明显更长的电池寿命。ROG Zephyrus 16提供的性能甚至更多。 ROG Zephyrus Duo 16它被列为游戏机,但由于有第二个显示屏,对内容创作者来说也很有趣。

价格和可用性

华硕ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED(英特尔酷睿i9-13980HX处理器,Nvidia Geforce RTX 4070 GPU,32GB DDR5 SO-DIMM内存,1TB SSD)的一个变体通过美国亚马逊出售,价格为2499,99美元

价格截至29.06.23,可能会有变化。

Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 - 06/27/2023 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
90 / 98 → 92%
Keyboard
92%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
73 / 80 → 92%
Weight
60 / 20-72 → 77%
Battery
66 / 95 → 69%
Display
89%
Games Performance
100 / 90 → 100%
Application Performance
96 / 90 → 100%
Temperature
59%
Noise
76 / 95 → 80%
Audio
89%
Camera
34 / 85 → 40%
Average
78%
86%
Multimedia - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华硕ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED回顾:具有极端CPU性能的多媒体笔记本电脑
Andreas Osthoff, 2023-06-29 (Update: 2023-06-29)