Notebookcheck Logo

华硕ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW评论。为内容创作者提供绝对的MacBook Pro替代品

形式与功能的结合。

华硕试图用ProArt StudioBook 16来吸引MacBook Pro的观众,其特点是Core i9-12900H和RTX 3070 Ti的组合,搭配生动的16英寸4K OLED面板,良好的排放配置文件,以及非常方便的华硕表盘。我们将华硕ProArt StudioBook 16与竞争对手进行比较,并告诉你这台笔记本电脑是否值得在你的创意武器库中占有一席之地。
Intel Alder Lake Laptop / Notebook Geforce
华硕ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW

华硕ProArt系列的目标是那些需要顶级硬件以获得无阻碍的生产力的创意专业人士。ProArt StudioBook的目标是成为Windows方面的创意者的MacBook Pro替代品,并具有为移动中的创作者量身定做的独特功能。

我们以前审查过 ProArt StudioBook 16 Pro W7600工作站笔记本电脑的特点是 英特尔至强W-11955M和一个 Nvidia RTX A5000 笔记本GPU.现在,我们有了ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW,它具有一个 英特尔酷睿i9-12900H和一个 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3070 Ti 笔记本电脑GPU.

我们的测试样品还配备了32GB DDR5-4800内存,16英寸三星4K OLED面板和1TB PCIe存储。华硕目前对这一配置的定价从1,99,990元起,在美国从2,699.99美元起。

不幸的是,华硕在ProArt系列中完全跳过了Ryzen 6000或Ryzen 7000选项。目前唯一基于Ryzen的SKU是ProArt StudioBook 16 OLED H5600,配有 Ryzen 9 5900HXRTX 3070笔记本电脑GPU.对这一变体的审查将很快进行。

然而,华硕公布了ProArt StudioBook 16 3D OLED在2023年国际消费电子展上推出了英特尔第13代和3D OLED面板的升级版,我们希望在未来几周内对其进行审查。

在这篇评论中,我们对华硕ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW进行了测试,看看这款笔记本电脑是否确实有潜力让你的创造力畅通无阻。

Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW (ProArt StudioBook 16 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i9-12900H 14 x 1.8 - 5 GHz, 115 W PL2 / Short Burst, 110 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, 115 W TDP, GDDR6, 527.56 Studio Driver, Optimus
Memory
32 GB 
, DDR5-4800 Quad-Channel, Timings: 40-39-39-76
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 3840 x 2400 pixel 283 PPI, No, Samsung ATNA60YV02, OLED, Dolby Vision, VESA HDR True Black 600, PANTONE Validated, glossy: yes, HDR, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, 1024 GB 
, 886 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo audio jack, Card Reader: Realtek SD Express 7.0
Networking
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 19.9 x 362 x 264
Battery
90 Wh Lithium-Ion, 4S1P, 4-cell, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 10 h
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: HD 720p with Windows Hello IR, Physical shutter
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo speakers with Smart Amp, Dolby Atmos, Keyboard: Chiclet keyboard with Numpad, Keyboard Light: yes, MyAsus, ProArt Creator Hub, ScreenXpert, GlideX, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
2.4 kg
Price
2500 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
89 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2023
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.4 kg19.9 mm16.00"3840x2400
83.8 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2022
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.5 kg19 mm17.00"2560x1600
83.7 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2022
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.4 kg20.4 mm16.00"2560x1600
86.3 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2022
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.3 kg27.2 mm15.60"2560x1440
88.4 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2022
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg19.5 mm16.00"3840x2400
84.7 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2022
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.3 kg22.4 mm16.00"3840x2400
87.9 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2022
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.1 kg19.5 mm16.00"2560x1600
88.2 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2022
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.6 kg20.5 mm16.00"3840x2400
93.2 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2021
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
M1 Pro, M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
2.2 kg16.8 mm16.20"3456x2234
92.1 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2022
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
M1 Max, M1 Max 24-Core GPU
1.6 kg15.5 mm14.20"3024x1964

外壳。充满信心的铝合金

机箱和触觉与ProArt StudioBook 16 Pro W7600完全相同。这台笔记本电脑相当重,有2.4公斤,但在0.78英寸的超薄16英寸机身上的重量分布相等,确实让人对日常操作充满信心。

特别是,我们喜欢凸起的设计,它允许更舒适的打字体验和无阻碍的空气流通。没有尖锐的边缘,我们也没有体验到任何肆意的显示屏晃动。盖子也相当耐扭。盖子可以用一个手指打开到150°,没有任何稳定性问题。

键盘甲板的顶部有进气孔。键盘板本身结构良好,没有可察觉的弯曲。底部有三个状态指示灯,分别是电源、电池和SSD活动。

华硕声称,矿物黑配色的磨砂盖子具有 "高科技防指纹纳米涂层"。虽然指纹可能不明显,但盖子对污垢没有免疫力,也不防油。

ProArt StudioBook 16还符合MIL-STD-810H的耐用性标准,可以轻松承受在户外工作的变化无常。

总的来说,华硕ProArt StudioBook 16可能不完全是MacBook Pro的感觉,但铝合金结构绝对是优质的,简约的,而且与要价很吻合。

尺寸比较

382 mm 260 mm 19 mm 2.5 kg362 mm 264 mm 19.9 mm 2.4 kg354 mm 259 mm 27.2 mm 2.3 kg360 mm 256 mm 20.4 mm 2.4 kg356 mm 248.5 mm 22.4 mm 2.3 kg356 mm 254 mm 19.5 mm 2.4 kg355 mm 266 mm 20.5 mm 2.6 kg354.6 mm 252 mm 19.5 mm 2.1 kg355.7 mm 248.1 mm 16.8 mm 2.2 kg312.6 mm 221.2 mm 15.5 mm 1.6 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性。缓慢、不稳定的Wi-Fi 6E吞吐量

华硕ProArt StudioBook 16的端口选择还不错,但不是很广泛。华硕完全放弃了USB 2.0端口。相反,你有两个USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-A端口,一个在两边。

由于是英特尔平台,几个Thunderbolt 4端口也可以在左边使用。还有一个HDMI 2.1输出和一个2.5Gb的LAN端口。

后面没有提供连接。由于这是一款以创造者为中心的笔记本电脑,把雷电4端口放在后面而不是把它们都挤在机箱的左侧可能更合理。这将有助于避免在主要工作区因底座和其他此类配件而产生的杂乱。

尽管如此,我们在连接多个外围设备时没有发现任何特别的障碍。

左边:Kensington锁插槽,USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-A,DC-in,HDMI 2.1输出,2x Thunderbolt 4
左边:Kensington锁插槽,USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-A,DC-in,HDMI 2.1输出,2x Thunderbolt 4
右边。SD读卡器、3.5毫米组合音频插孔、USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-A、2.5 GbE RJ-45
右边。SD读卡器、3.5毫米组合音频插孔、USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-A、2.5 GbE RJ-45
后方。没有端口
后方。没有端口

SD卡阅读器

华硕为ProArt StudoBook 16配备了一个SD Express 7.0读卡器。该读卡器提供了体面的传输速度,接近同类产品的平均水平,并类似于在 联想ThinkBook 16p第三代华硕ZenBook Pro 16X OLED.

然而,这并不是我们所见过的最快的SD卡性能--这要归功于 ROG Zephyrus Duo 162021Apple MacBook Pro 16.

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
155 MB/s +111%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
121 MB/s +64%
Average of class Multimedia
  (18.4 - 201, n=60, last 2 years)
102.2 MB/s +39%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Intel Core i9-12900H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
79.6 MB/s +8%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
76 MB/s +3%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
75.4 MB/s +2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
73.6 (73.36min - 73.96max) MB/s
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
71.7 MB/s -3%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
185 MB/s +125%
Average of class Multimedia
  (25.8 - 266, n=59, last 2 years)
142.9 MB/s +74%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
84.9 MB/s +3%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
82.3 MB/s
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
81 MB/s -2%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Intel Core i9-12900H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
76.3 MB/s -7%

沟通

英特尔Wi-Fi 6E AX211卡被焊接在主板上。
英特尔Wi-Fi 6E AX211卡被焊接在主板上。

ProArt StudioBook 16采用了英特尔Wi-Fi 6E AX211 WLAN卡,不幸的是它被焊接在主板上。我们用我们的参考华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000路由器测试了5GHz和6GHz频段的Wi-Fi性能,距离笔记本电脑1米,没有其他连接设备或外部干扰。

笔记本电脑在5GHz频谱中显示出体面的传输速率,总体上与竞争对手持平。 然而,6GHz频段表现相当差,特别是在传输测试中,有很多不稳定因素。我们发现,即使经过多次重复,情况也是如此。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1695 (1556min - 1768max) MBit/s +12%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1507 (518min - 1662max) MBit/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1482 (962min - 1587max) MBit/s -2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (358 - 1921, n=79, last 2 years)
1363 MBit/s -10%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1333 (1044min - 1390max) MBit/s -12%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (464 - 1921, n=239)
1234 MBit/s -18%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
891 (558min - 996max) MBit/s -41%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
Realtek RTL8852BE
879 (777min - 963max) MBit/s -42%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
766 (698min - 785max) MBit/s -49%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1748 (903min - 1835max) MBit/s +13%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1700 (1582min - 1730max) MBit/s +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1692 (1567min - 1738max) MBit/s +10%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1543 (1340min - 1726max) MBit/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (709 - 1789, n=78, last 2 years)
1451 MBit/s -6%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (582 - 1890, n=239)
1379 MBit/s -11%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1030 (752min - 1313max) MBit/s -33%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
942 (920min - 950max) MBit/s -39%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
874 (522min - 938max) MBit/s -43%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
Realtek RTL8852BE
846 (706min - 894max) MBit/s -45%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1481 (1314min - 1543max) MBit/s +21%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1455 (1105min - 1672max) MBit/s +18%
Average of class Multimedia
  (705 - 1816, n=36, last 2 years)
1411 MBit/s +15%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (632 - 1851, n=211)
1372 MBit/s +12%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1228 (798min - 1501max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1857 (831min - 1948max) MBit/s +31%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1701 (1471min - 1746max) MBit/s +20%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (700 - 1857, n=210)
1493 MBit/s +5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (700 - 1807, n=36, last 2 years)
1488 MBit/s +5%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1416 (1167min - 1743max) MBit/s
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1507 (518-1662)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1543 (1340-1726)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1228 (798-1501)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1415 (1167-1743)

网络摄像头

ProArt StudioBook 16缺少一个高质量的网络摄像头。内置的720p摄像头的图像质量没有什么可写的。

照片显示出较大的颜色偏差,缺乏清晰度和细节,尽管只要有足够的环境光线,他们就可以为一两个奇怪的视频电话服务。它可以通过F11键的快捷方式关闭网络摄像头。

华硕可以很容易地提供一个1080p的模块来代替这个价格。

ColorChecker
14.5 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
17 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
12 ∆E
12 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
14 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW: 12.54 ∆E min: 3.43 - max: 16.95 ∆E

安全问题

ProArt StudioBook 16为网络摄像头配备了一个物理快门,并为基于Windows Hello的登录提供了一个红外摄像头。没有指纹识别器,但有TPM 2.0芯片和Kensington锁插槽。

维护

ProArt StudioBook 16具有良好的可维修性。要进入内部,需要卸下背板上的13颗奇怪的Torx T5螺丝。宽敞的机箱为各种部件之间提供了良好的分隔。

内存和NVMe固态硬盘可以被换掉或升级,而Wi-Fi卡是焊接的。如果有必要,电池可以被拧开。我们还看到一个单独的PCB,用于华硕拨号。

华硕ProArt StudioBook 16内部结构
华硕ProArt StudioBook 16内部结构

配件和保修

盒子里有240瓦的电源适配器和通常的文书工作。此外,华硕还提供了一个为移动中的创作者设计的功利性背包。

输入设备。触摸板有自己的想法

键盘

全尺寸的背光Chiclet键盘感觉很宽敞,有适当大小的方向键。1.4毫米的移动距离使打字相当舒适,触觉反馈很好,咔哒声很低。最上面一排提供了常用功能的快捷键,包括调整三段式背光。

华硕表盘

ProArt Creator Hub中的华硕表盘功能
ProArt Creator Hub中的华硕表盘功能

华硕表盘是ProArt StudioBook系列的突出特点。Dial为创作者提供了使用其应用程序的模拟感觉。

目前,华硕提供了与Adobe程序的兼容性,如Photoshop、Illustrator、Lightroom Classic、Premiere Pro和After Effects,对更多的应用程序的支持正在进行中。

Dial还可以使用常见的Windows功能,如亮度和音量调节。Dial的其他功能可以从ProArt Creator Hub内添加。

在实践中,华硕拨号盘是相当直观的,但可能需要一些时间来习惯用肌肉记忆来访问功能。拨号盘并不妨碍打字或使用触摸板。

触摸板

ProArt StudioBook 16采用了优质的玻璃触摸板,与WindowsPrecision 手势完全兼容。华硕在触摸板的底部提供了三个物理按钮,这在现在是很罕见的,但在创意应用中可以用来平移或旋转场景中的对象。

触摸板本身没有点击功能,尽管左键点击仍以轻触方式登记。然而,我们评测单位的触摸板似乎过于敏感。这常常导致触摸板错误地将点击识别为拖动和保持手势。在控制面板中改变鼠标灵敏度也没有什么帮助。

在正常使用中,经常有一个以上的手指点击触摸板,这是很自然的。这马上就会触发一个拖动和保持的手势,使UI导航变得有些不直观。物理按钮提供了一个有点模糊但令人满意的点击。

华硕拨号盘可以在支持的应用程序中进行模拟式调整,但触摸板非常敏感。
华硕拨号盘可以在支持的应用程序中进行模拟式调整,但触摸板非常敏感。

显示屏。60赫兹杜比视界OELD面板,带PWM功能

ProArt StudioBook 16配备了来自三星的16英寸16:10 4K(3840 x 2400)OLED面板。华硕只用了一个60赫兹的面板,但在其他方面进行了弥补,我们将在下面看到。

子像素排列表明,S-Stripe RGB矩阵的整体密度为283PPI。由于这是一个OLED面板,所以没有观察到背光渗漏。

子像素矩阵
子像素矩阵
长时间曝光下绝对零背光渗漏
长时间曝光下绝对零背光渗漏

由于是OLED面板,三星ATNA60YV02提供了均匀的98%的亮度分布和基本上无限的对比度。我们测量了378尼特的平均SDR亮度水平。

峰值HDR亮度
峰值HDR亮度

据华硕称,ProArt StudioBook 16的OLED面板通过了VESA DisplayHDR True Black 600认证。支持Dolby Vision HDR。

在我们的测试中,我们在HDR模式下记录了586尼特的峰值亮度,白色图像为100%。

MyAsus应用程序中的显示设置
MyAsus应用程序中的显示设置

MyAsus应用程序提供了设置像素刷新和像素移动设置的选项,以保护OLED不被烧毁。用户还可以调整要使用的直流调光的程度。

你还可以通过Splendid在各种颜色配置文件中进行选择。我们在正常设置下进行了显示器校准。

378
cd/m²
371
cd/m²
373
cd/m²
377
cd/m²
370
cd/m²
374
cd/m²
373
cd/m²
371
cd/m²
375
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Samsung ATNA60YV02 tested with X-Rite i1Basic Pro 3
Maximum: 378 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 373.6 cd/m² Minimum: 4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 369 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.97 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.15
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.13
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Samsung ATNA60YV02, OLED, 3840x2400, 16"
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
AUOD298, IPS True Pixel (~100% DCI-P3), 2560x1600, 16"
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
BOE CQ NE156QHM-NZ2, IPS-level, 2560x1440, 15.6"
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung SDC415D, OLED, 3840x2400, 16"
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
BOE NE160QAM-NX1, IPS-Level, 3840x2400, 16"
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Liquid Retina XDR, Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.2"
Display
-4%
-5%
-3%
-4%
-3%
Display P3 Coverage
99.6
97.6
-2%
96.2
-3%
99.84
0%
98
-2%
99.1
-1%
sRGB Coverage
100
99.9
0%
99.9
0%
99.99
0%
99.9
0%
100
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
96.5
86.8
-10%
84.5
-12%
88.9
-8%
86.3
-11%
88
-9%
Response Times
-321%
-165%
21%
-372%
7242%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
1.6 ?(0.82, 0.78)
12.9 ?(6.4, 6.5)
-706%
7.86 ?(4.02, 3.84)
-391%

4.21 ?(1.98, 2.23)
-163%

2 ?(1, 1)
-25%
14.6 ?(6.7, 7.9)
-813%
42.8 ?(19.6, 23.2)
-2575%
Response Time Black / White *
18.32 ?(17.39, 0.93)
6.4 ?(2.6, 3.8)
65%
7.5 ?(3.89, 3.61)
59%
2 ?(1, 1)
89%
5.6 ?(2, 3.6)
69%
91.6 ?(76, 15.6)
-400%
PWM Frequency
60 ?(100)
59 ?(80)
-2%
14880
24700%
Screen
12%
-14%
6%
-10%
30%
Brightness middle
370
428
16%
346
-6%
346
-6%
459
24%
514
39%
Brightness
374
394
5%
329
-12%
354
-5%
434
16%
497
33%
Brightness Distribution
98
86
-12%
91
-7%
96
-2%
88
-10%
95
-3%
Black Level *
0.42
0.59
0.44
0.02
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.97
1.67
44%
3.06
-3%
2.28
23%
2.97
-0%
1.4
53%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.38
5.71
-30%
5.81
-33%
4.94
-13%
8.13
-86%
2.8
36%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
2.15
0.71
67%
2.57
-20%
2.16
-0%
1.03
52%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.9
3.1
-7%
1.64
43%
4.9
-69%
2.3
21%
Gamma
2.13 103%
2.195 100%
2.12 104%
2.37 93%
2.235 98%
2.27 97%
CCT
6636 98%
6498 100%
7021 93%
6384 102%
6775 96%
6792 96%
Contrast
1019
586
1043
25700
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-104% / -48%
-61% / -49%
8% / 7%
-129% / -69%
2423% / 1825%

* ... smaller is better

华硕宣传三星OLED面板的DCI-P3色域覆盖率为100%,而我们的测量结果显示,该面板确实能够完全覆盖sRGB和Display P3色彩空间。

Adobe RGB的覆盖率也非常好,达到96.5%,这使得ProArt StudioBook 16在内容创作和多媒体消费方面都非常出色。

vs. sRGB - 100%覆盖
vs. sRGB - 100%覆盖
vs. Adobe RGB - 96.5%的覆盖率
vs. Adobe RGB - 96.5%的覆盖率
对比显示P3 - 99.6%的覆盖率
对比显示P3 - 99.6%的覆盖率
ProArt Creator Hub中的色彩校准
ProArt Creator Hub中的色彩校准

经过PANTONE验证的显示器应该提供1.6的平均Delta E,开箱即用。然而,我们在灰度和ColorChecker的正常色彩配置文件中测得的Delta Es为2.9和2.97。

华硕还提供了一种方法,可以在ProArt Creator Hub应用程序中用兼容的分光光度计进行显示器校准。

使用X-rite i1Basic Pro 3分光光度计和Portrait Displays公司的Calman Ultimate色彩校准软件在DCI-P3中进一步校准显示器,结果灰度Delta E明显改善,仅为0.7。

ColorChecker Delta E在校准后略微提高到2.15。从视觉上看,除了100%的红色和蓝色阴影,大多数颜色在校准后都显示出了准确性的提高。

校准后的ICC文件可以从上面的链接下载。

校准前的灰度
校准前的灰度
校准前的ColorChecker
校准前的ColorChecker
校准前的饱和扫频
校准前的饱和扫频
校准后的灰度
校准后的灰度
校准后的ColorChecker
校准后的ColorChecker
校准后的饱和扫频
校准后的饱和扫频

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
18.32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.39 ms rise
↘ 0.93 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.82 ms rise
↘ 0.78 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

OLED面板提供了一个出色的50%灰色到80%灰色的响应时间,即1.6毫秒。然而,100%黑色到100%白色的转换需要18.32毫秒。这对于游戏来说应该还是可以的,对于笔记本电脑的预期使用情况来说绝对不是问题。

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 60 Hz ≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

华硕使用直流调光来调整背光强度。60赫兹的直流调光在亮度水平高于51%至100%时出现。低于50%时,面板使用PWM,以240赫兹的频率闪烁。当Windows亮度滑块被设置为0%时,这将减少到160赫兹。

49%的亮度
49%的亮度
25%的亮度
25%的亮度
0%的亮度
0%的亮度

明亮的屏幕确保了在阳光下的良好能见度。除了在极端情况下亮度损失很小外,视角相对稳定。

阳光下的户外观看
阳光下的户外观看
在树荫下的户外观赏
在树荫下的户外观赏
极端视角下的亮度损失最小
极端视角下的亮度损失最小

性能。毫无保留的Core i9-12900H和RTX 3070 Ti组合

我们的华硕ProArt StudioBook 16搭载了 英特尔酷睿i9-12900H处理器和一个115W NvidiaGeForce RTX 3070 Ti笔记本GPU.买家还可以选择具有以下特点的SKU 酷睿i7-12700H和一个 GeForce RTX 3060RTX 3080 Ti笔记本GPU以及可升级的DDR5-4800内存选项,最高可达64GB。

 

测试条件

ProArt Creator Hub中的性能描述
ProArt Creator Hub中的性能描述

设备设置分布在ProArt Creator Hub和MyAsus应用程序之间,这对于那些刚接触ProArt系列的人来说,最初可能会有点混乱。

ProArt Creator Hub允许你在三种可用的性能模式之间进行选择,这将影响Core i9-12900H的TDP,如下表所示。

我们在所有的测试中都使用了全速性能模式,除了电池运行时间测试,这是在标准模式下进行的。

性能模式 PL1(PBP)/ Tau PL2(MTP)/ Tau
标准 60 W / 56 s 115 W / 2.44 ms
性能 110 W / 56 s 115 W / 2.44 ms
全速 110 W / 56 s 115 W / 2.44 ms

处理器

英特尔酷睿i9-12900H提供良好的持续性能,没有节流现象
英特尔酷睿i9-12900H提供良好的持续性能,没有节流现象

英特尔Alder Lake-H酷睿i9-12900H具有14个核心和20个线程,提升到5GHz。华硕的冷却实现似乎相当强大,我们的Cinebench R15多核循环测试没有显示出可感知的节流迹象,就是证明。

ProArt StudioBook 16在整体CPU性能方面处于领先地位,尽管与采用相同处理器的竞争对手相比,它的领先优势不大。也就是说,由于115W PL2,单核性能受到了很小的打击,与微星造物主Z16P相比,单核性能受到了很大的影响。 微星创造者Z16P的160W。 华硕ROG Strix Scar 15的135W,和 微星创造者Z17的120W。

相较于 Apple M1 ProM1 Max相比,ProArt StudioBook 16中的Core i9-12900H在Cinebench R23中的单核速度快22%,多核速度快55%。

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

01503004506007509001050120013501500165018001950210022502400255027002850Tooltip
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2876 (2835.07-2906.13)
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2720 (2672.55-2894.15)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2788 (2732.8-2978.18)
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø2616 (2562.79-2779.9)
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX: Ø2145 (2133.11-2160.06)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro: Ø1681 (1674.55-1690.12)
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU Apple M1 Max; Rosetta 2: Ø1684 (1672.66-1688.19)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H
83 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H
81.5 pt
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H
80.9 pt
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
79.3 pt
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H
75.6 pt
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Intel Core i9-12900H
74.5 pt
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
 
71 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
68 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
66.1 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro -5!
Apple M1 Pro
63.8 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU -5!
Apple M1 Max
63.6 pt
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
60.1 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H
19147 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H
19064 Points 0%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H
18444 Points -4%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
18106 Points -5%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H
16691 (16019.4min - 16691.2max) Points -13%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Intel Core i9-12900H
16346 Points -15%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6936 - 30789, n=102, last 2 years)
15381 Points -20%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (7359 - 19648, n=28)
15133 Points -21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
14085 Points -26%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
13463 (13112.3min - 13463.1max) Points -30%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
Apple M1 Max
12386 Points -35%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
12370 Points -35%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1940 Points +4%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H
1921 Points +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H
1918 Points +3%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Intel Core i9-12900H
1864 Points 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H
1863 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (1634 - 1930, n=28)
1829 Points -2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (878 - 2290, n=93, last 2 years)
1764 Points -5%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H
1718 Points -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1566 Points -16%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1556 Points -16%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
1534 Points -18%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
Apple M1 Max
1533 Points -18%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H
7350 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H
7109 Points -3%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H
6950 Points -5%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
6941 Points -6%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Intel Core i9-12900H
6060 Points -18%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H
6060 Points -18%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (2681 - 7471, n=28)
5717 Points -22%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2681 - 11768, n=86, last 2 years)
5672 Points -23%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
5489 Points -25%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
5253 Points -29%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
Apple M1 Max
2750 Points -63%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
2721 Points -63%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H
738 Points 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H
737 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H
728 Points -1%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Intel Core i9-12900H
714 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (624 - 738, n=28)
706 Points -4%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
685 Points -7%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H
680 Points -8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (341 - 853, n=86, last 2 years)
652 Points -12%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
604 Points -18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
595 Points -19%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
Apple M1 Max
395 Points -46%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
393 Points -47%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H
2978 (2732.8min - 2978.18max) Points +2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H
2906 (2835.07min - 2906.13max) Points
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H
2894 (2672.55min - 2894.15max) Points 0%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
2780 Points -4%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H
2627 (2458.81min - 2626.74max) Points -10%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Intel Core i9-12900H
2626 (2273.63min - 2626.4max) Points -10%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (1395 - 3077, n=28)
2454 Points -16%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1252 - 4774, n=93, last 2 years)
2432 Points -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
2292 Points -21%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
2160 (2133.11min - 2160.06max) Points -26%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
1690 (1675min - 1690max) Points -42%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
Apple M1 Max
1689 (1667min - 1689max) Points -42%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
279 Points +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H
276 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H
275 Points 0%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H
275 Points 0%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H
264 Points -4%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H
245 Points -11%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (235 - 277, n=29)
262 Points -5%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Intel Core i9-12900H
261 Points -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (99.6 - 323, n=88, last 2 years)
258 Points -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
249 Points -10%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
241 Points -13%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
Apple M1 Max
210 Points -24%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
209 Points -24%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Multimedia
  (107 - 502, n=85, last 2 years)
253 Seconds * -52%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
247 Seconds * -49%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (160 - 451, n=28)
231 Seconds * -39%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
220 Seconds * -33%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Intel Core i9-12900H
210 Seconds * -27%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
200 Seconds * -20%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H
190.3 Seconds * -15%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
Apple M1 Max
190 Seconds * -14%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H
185 Seconds * -11%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
183.3 Seconds * -10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H
175.4 Seconds * -6%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H
166 Seconds *
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H
76677 MIPS
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H
72610 MIPS -5%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H
69637 MIPS -9%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
68520 MIPS -11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H
67680 MIPS -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
64457 MIPS -16%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Intel Core i9-12900H
62428 MIPS -19%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (34684 - 76677, n=28)
60849 MIPS -21%
Average of class Multimedia
  (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years)
60219 MIPS -21%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
55816 MIPS -27%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H
6289 MIPS
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
6186 MIPS -2%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H
6120 MIPS -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H
5881 MIPS -6%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Intel Core i9-12900H
5861 MIPS -7%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (5302 - 6289, n=28)
5843 MIPS -7%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H
5842 MIPS -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
5727 MIPS -9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years)
5716 MIPS -9%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
5090 MIPS -19%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H
14376 Points +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H
14220 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H
14140 Points -1%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
13865 Points -2%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H
13547 Points -5%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Intel Core i9-12900H
13308 Points -6%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
Apple M1 Max
12563 Points -12%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
12499 Points -12%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4990 - 23059, n=87, last 2 years)
12061 Points -15%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (8519 - 14376, n=31)
11913 Points -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
10167 Points -29%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
9341 Points -34%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H
1886 Points 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H
1878 Points
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1870 Points 0%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Intel Core i9-12900H
1866 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H
1849 Points -2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (891 - 2555, n=87, last 2 years)
1826 Points -3%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H
1820 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (1631 - 1897, n=31)
1800 Points -4%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
1768 Points -6%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
Apple M1 Max
1764 Points -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1594 Points -15%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1549 Points -18%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H
22.3 fps
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H
21.1 fps -5%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H
19.2 fps -14%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H
18.9 fps -15%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
18.1 fps -19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
18 fps -19%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Intel Core i9-12900H
17.6 fps -21%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (8.05 - 22.5, n=28)
17.1 fps -23%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
16.8 fps -25%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years)
16.4 fps -26%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
57.8 s * -33%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.7 - 146.7, n=81, last 2 years)
49.2 s * -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
45 s * -3%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H
43.5 s *
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (36.8 - 59.8, n=28)
42.4 s * +3%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Intel Core i9-12900H
40.6 s * +7%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H
39.8 s * +9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H
39.7 s * +9%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
39 s * +10%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H
39 s * +10%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
0.4974 sec * -13%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years)
0.4845 sec * -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
0.4799 sec * -9%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (0.4218 - 0.506, n=28)
0.454 sec * -4%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Intel Core i9-12900H
0.4501 sec * -3%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H
0.4474 sec * -2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H
0.4383 sec *
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H
0.432 sec * +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H
0.4316 sec * +2%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
0.4155 sec * +5%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2906 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
253 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
276 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
7350 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
737 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
19147 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1863 Points
Help

下图说明了在Cinebench R15多核循环测试中各种CPU参数的变化。我们看到,所有三种性能模式都能够达到最大的时钟、功率和温度限制。

然而,标准模式的平均封装功率较低,为51瓦,而其他两种模式为90瓦。这导致了较低的平均内核时钟(约2.7GHz)和较低的内核温度(徘徊在67℃左右)。

性能模式和全速模式在功率限制方面大致相同,但后者即使在空闲状态下也会以最大速度持续旋转风扇。因此,与性能模式相比,全速模式下的平均核心温度要低约6℃。

在Cinebench R15循环中的CPU时钟、封装功率和核心温度。(红色:全速,绿色:性能,蓝色:标准)
在Cinebench R15循环中的CPU时钟、封装功率和核心温度。(红色:全速,绿色:性能,蓝色:标准)
Cinebench R20的性能在电池上受到了不小的冲击
Cinebench R20的性能在电池上受到了不小的冲击

然而,性能在电池供电的情况下会受到影响。在电池上运行时,Cinebench R20的单核分数下降52%,多核下降40%。

不像Apple ,无论是插电还是电池供电,MacBook Pros的性能都相当稳定,ProArt StudioBook 16,像所有现代x86设备一样,只有在连接到电源时才能完全发挥它的力量。

也就是说,电池上的性能下降应该仍然足以帮助你在移动中完成创造性工作。

总的来说,ProArt StudioBook 16提供了足够的CPU马力,可以在不出汗的情况下通过最苛刻的工作流程。

Performance Rating
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
92.8 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
89.2 pt
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
79.8 pt
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
79.2 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
74 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
70.3 pt
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
67.6 pt
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
 
67.3 pt
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
63.7 pt
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
62.3 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
17671 KRay/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
16852 KRay/s -5%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
15817 KRay/s -10%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
14490 KRay/s -18%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4906 - 36957, n=76, last 2 years)
14392 KRay/s -19%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (4074 - 18289, n=28)
11191 KRay/s -37%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9592 KRay/s -46%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
8552 KRay/s -52%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
8265 KRay/s -53%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
8187 KRay/s -54%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
103794 Points +13%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
99306 Points +9%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
91470 Points
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
75514 Points -17%
Average of class Multimedia
  (14528 - 147248, n=77, last 2 years)
72601 Points -21%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (22307 - 93236, n=28)
55458 Points -39%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
42697 Points -53%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
40242 Points -56%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
38277 Points -58%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
37985 Points -58%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
4214 MB/s
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
3663 MB/s -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3547 MB/s -16%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3471 MB/s -18%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1529 - 6698, n=77, last 2 years)
3385 MB/s -20%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
3284 MB/s -22%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (1378 - 4215, n=28)
3048 MB/s -28%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3021 MB/s -28%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2931 MB/s -30%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2885 MB/s -32%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
111241 Points
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
110468 Points -1%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
107042 Points -4%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
106489 Points -4%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
105172 Points -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
104920 Points -6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
104784 Points -6%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
102396 Points -8%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (78172 - 111241, n=28)
100462 Points -10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (21547 - 141074, n=77, last 2 years)
90675 Points -18%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
13146 Points +26%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
12955 Points +24%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
10410 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
10220 Points -2%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
10146 Points -3%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
9717 Points -7%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9655 Points -7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1240 - 19021, n=77, last 2 years)
9325 Points -10%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9130 Points -12%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (5709 - 10410, n=28)
9016 Points -13%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
57334 Points +26%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
54727 Points +20%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
45465 Points
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
36454 Points -20%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9903 - 75780, n=76, last 2 years)
36124 Points -21%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (11257 - 45581, n=28)
28667 Points -37%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
25718 Points -43%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
23330 Points -49%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
22873 Points -50%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
21952 Points -52%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
151546 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
139407 MB/s -8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
104589 MB/s -31%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
103426 MB/s -32%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
91041 MB/s -40%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
88696 MB/s -41%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (31935 - 151546, n=28)
85711 MB/s -43%
Average of class Multimedia
  (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years)
75931 MB/s -50%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
71470 MB/s -53%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
54613 MB/s -64%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
1193 MB/s +11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
1188 MB/s +10%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
1077 MB/s
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
1037 MB/s -4%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
988 MB/s -8%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
952 MB/s -12%
Average of class Multimedia
  (454 - 1973, n=77, last 2 years)
934 MB/s -13%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (449 - 1193, n=28)
932 MB/s -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
890 MB/s -17%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
838 MB/s -22%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
10097 KRay/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9001 KRay/s -11%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
8400 KRay/s -17%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
8017 KRay/s -21%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2738 - 20608, n=77, last 2 years)
7814 KRay/s -23%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (2235 - 10511, n=28)
6205 KRay/s -39%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
5498 KRay/s -46%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
4940 KRay/s -51%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
4776 KRay/s -53%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
4639 KRay/s -54%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
46642 MPixel/s +10%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
42375 MPixel/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years)
40793 MPixel/s -4%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
40363 MPixel/s -5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
39856 MPixel/s -6%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
39549 MPixel/s -7%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
38990 MPixel/s -8%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (20960 - 48269, n=29)
36660 MPixel/s -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
29705 MPixel/s -30%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
26873 MPixel/s -37%

查看我们专门的 英特尔酷睿i9-12900H页面了解更多信息和性能比较。

系统性能

ProArt StudioBook 16在日常系统性能和反应能力方面没有问题。PCMark 10的总体分数是在这个配置的预期线上。

与华硕ROG Strix Scar 15和微星Creator Z17相比,CrossMark出现了轻微的挫折,但StudioBook 16比M1 Max MacBook Pro 14快17%。 M1 Max MacBook Pro 14和22%的速度比 M1 Pro MacBook Pro 16.

然而,Affinity Photo 2看到Apple 芯片明显领先于Core i9-12900H。ProArt StudioBook 16在综合CPU测试中落后14%,在综合GPU测试中比基于M1 Max的MacBook Pro 14落后多达55%。

PCMark 10 / Score
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8083 Points 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8072 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7904 Points -2%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
7816 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (7087 - 8072, n=6)
7712 Points -4%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7455 Points -8%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
7087 Points -12%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
6838 Points -15%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years)
6789 Points -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
6351 Points -21%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
11663 Points
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
11019 Points -6%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
11012 Points -6%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
10945 Points -6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (10266 - 11663, n=6)
10807 Points -7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10708 Points -8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years)
10515 Points -10%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
10266 Points -12%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
10167 Points -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
9374 Points -20%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
11186 Points +4%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10742 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10424 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (9402 - 10742, n=6)
10153 Points -5%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10076 Points -6%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
10050 Points -6%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
9402 Points -12%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
9073 Points -16%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years)
8919 Points -17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
7704 Points -28%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
12007 Points +5%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
11777 Points +3%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
11626 Points +2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
11393 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (10009 - 12541, n=6)
11364 Points 0%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10132 Points -11%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
10009 Points -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
9626 Points -16%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
9408 Points -17%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years)
9194 Points -19%
CrossMark / Overall
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
2113 Points +12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2044 Points +8%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2009 Points +6%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1895 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1664 - 2044, n=6)
1871 Points -1%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1789 Points -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (978 - 2184, n=89, last 2 years)
1713 Points -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
1711 Points -10%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
M1 Max 24-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP0512
1615 Points -15%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R
1556 Points -18%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1518 Points -20%
CrossMark / Productivity
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
2031 Points +13%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1968 Points +10%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1914 Points +7%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1793 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1591 - 1968, n=6)
1784 Points -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
1698 Points -5%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1677 Points -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (913 - 2064, n=89, last 2 years)
1623 Points -9%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1501 Points -16%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
M1 Max 24-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP0512
1379 Points -23%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R
1342 Points -25%
CrossMark / Creativity
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
2161 Points +4%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
M1 Max 24-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP0512
2160 Points +4%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2148 Points +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2115 Points +2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2079 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R
2054 Points -1%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2032 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1797 - 2148, n=6)
2004 Points -4%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1054 - 2594, n=89, last 2 years)
1923 Points -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
1724 Points -17%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1658 Points -20%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
2228 Points +31%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2069 Points +22%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1898 Points +12%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1514 - 2069, n=6)
1759 Points +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
1715 Points +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1697 Points
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1486 Points -12%
Average of class Multimedia
  (869 - 2171, n=89, last 2 years)
1440 Points -15%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1206 Points -29%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
M1 Max 24-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP0512
1087 Points -36%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R
1055 Points -38%
Affinity Photo 2 / Combined (Multi CPU)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R
1044 Points +17%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
M1 Max 24-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP0512
1024 Points +15%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
893 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  ()
893 Points 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (last 2 years)
893 Points 0%
Affinity Photo 2 / Combined (Single / Multi GPU)
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
M1 Max 24-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP0512
18284 Points +123%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R
14293 Points +74%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8213 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  ()
8213 Points 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (last 2 years)
8213 Points 0%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5440 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5380 points
PCMark 10 Score
8072 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
71596 MB/s +15%
Average of class Multimedia
  (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years)
69078 MB/s +11%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
63091 MB/s +1%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
62419 MB/s 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
62196 MB/s
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
61813 MB/s -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
61561 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (34438 - 74264, n=28)
58945 MB/s -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
53162 MB/s -15%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
50007 MB/s -20%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
72739 MB/s +10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years)
70185 MB/s +6%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
66727 MB/s +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
66156 MB/s
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65835 MB/s 0%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
65134 MB/s -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
65018 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (36365 - 74642, n=28)
61718 MB/s -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
53321 MB/s -19%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
43892 MB/s -34%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Multimedia
  (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years)
70291 MB/s +9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
64873 MB/s +1%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
64500 MB/s 0%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
64444 MB/s 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
64218 MB/s
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
62746 MB/s -2%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
61981 MB/s -3%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (32276 - 67858, n=28)
59318 MB/s -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
57180 MB/s -11%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
51085 MB/s -20%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
120.6 ns * -35%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
107.9 ns * -21%
Average of class Multimedia
  (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years)
107 ns * -20%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
97.6 ns * -9%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
95 ns * -6%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
95 ns * -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
92.3 ns * -3%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
89.7 ns * -0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
89.3 ns *
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (74.7 - 118.1, n=27)
85.7 ns * +4%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延时

我们测量到最高的中断到处理的延迟是1493.8微秒,这对于一个以内容创作者为中心的笔记本电脑来说是偏高的。Nvidia内核模式的系统驱动似乎是延迟增加的原因。

对于创作者的笔记本电脑来说,DPC延迟是偏高的。
对于创作者的笔记本电脑来说,DPC延迟是偏高的。
Nvidia内核模式驱动程序似乎是DPC高延迟的原因
Nvidia内核模式驱动程序似乎是DPC高延迟的原因
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1756 μs * -18%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1595 μs * -7%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1493.8 μs *
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
892.1 μs * +40%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
809 μs * +46%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
623 μs * +58%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
521.5 μs * +65%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
424.1 μs * +72%

* ... smaller is better

我们的 DPC延时排行页面提供了更多经过审查的设备之间的延迟比较。

存储设备

三星PM9A1 NVMe固态硬盘在持续负载下节流严重
三星PM9A1 NVMe固态硬盘在持续负载下节流严重

附带的三星PM9A1 1 TB NVMe SSD在整个磁盘基准中表现不错,但它落后于ROG Strix Scar 15和Creator Z16P中的2 TB表亲。它仍然比华硕ZenBook Pro 16X OLED中的相同驱动器快10%。

固态硬盘被包裹在铝制包装中,背板上也有散热垫。然而,在我们的DiskSpd读取循环测试中,该驱动器在队列深度为8时严重节流。

一个备用的M.2 2280插槽可用于添加另一个NVMe驱动器。然而,没有2.5英寸的驱动器插槽。

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7084.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5150.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 640.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 540.4 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 4124 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 3388 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 83.33 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 179.9 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 591.7 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1390.3 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
82.4 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
80.1 pt
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
78.6 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
76.2 pt
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
 
63.2 pt
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
62.8 pt
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
59.1 pt
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
54 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
47.9 pt
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
43.6 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
4903 MB/s +121%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4409 (4405.49min - 4409.47max) MB/s +99%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
3925 (3809.41min - 3925.24max) MB/s +77%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
3819 (3405.77min - 3819.33max) MB/s +72%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (1761 - 4677, n=85)
3764 MB/s +70%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1629 - 4861, n=76, last 2 years)
2979 MB/s +34%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2493 (2013.43min - 2492.51max) MB/s +12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2397 (2152.62min - 2396.66max) MB/s +8%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2217 (2058.43min - 2216.87max) MB/s
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1761 (1552.52min - 1761.4max) MB/s -21%
seq write
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
7889 (6495.73min - 7888.81max) MB/s +119%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4488 (4442.32min - 4488.16max) MB/s +25%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
4457 MB/s +24%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4357 (4242.96min - 4356.83max) MB/s +21%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4318 (3988.57min - 4318.21max) MB/s +20%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3596 (3469.95min - 3595.84max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2220 - 4564, n=85)
3578 MB/s -1%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
3330 (3236.77min - 3330.07max) MB/s -7%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3297 (3192.19min - 3296.93max) MB/s -8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (463 - 5711, n=76, last 2 years)
3127 MB/s -13%
seq q8 t1 read
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
10557 (9742.97min - 10557.3max) MB/s +50%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7061 (5377.52min - 7060.97max) MB/s
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
7028 (6634.28min - 7027.76max) MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7006 (6563.67min - 7005.79max) MB/s -1%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6911 (1344.52min - 6911.16max) MB/s -2%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
6734 (5940.88min - 6734.33max) MB/s -5%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
6693 (6099.78min - 6692.85max) MB/s -5%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
6619 (5489.64min - 6619.24max) MB/s -6%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (3421 - 7100, n=85)
6477 MB/s -8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2132 - 7126, n=76, last 2 years)
5465 MB/s -23%
seq q8 t1 write
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
9830 (9799.27min - 9829.82max) MB/s +89%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5263 (5104.74min - 5263.39max) MB/s +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5207 (5146.62min - 5206.6max) MB/s
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5171 (5109.92min - 5170.88max) MB/s -1%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
5004 (4980.32min - 5004.43max) MB/s -4%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4955 (4541.17min - 4954.68max) MB/s -5%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4938 (4568.02min - 4938.35max) MB/s -5%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4935 (4927.47min - 4934.6max) MB/s -5%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2216 - 5281, n=85)
4814 MB/s -8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (555 - 6898, n=76, last 2 years)
4195 MB/s -19%
4k q1 t1 read
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
90.1 (89.91min - 90.07max) MB/s 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
90 (89.31min - 90.04max) MB/s
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
88.7 MB/s -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
86.8 (82.52min - 86.79max) MB/s -4%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (48.4 - 97.4, n=85)
76.7 MB/s -15%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
73.5 (72.63min - 73.49max) MB/s -18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
73.1 (72.79min - 73.06max) MB/s -19%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
71.1 (69.1min - 71.12max) MB/s -21%
Average of class Multimedia
  (14.6 - 97.7, n=76, last 2 years)
63.4 MB/s -30%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
43.7 (43.05min - 43.74max) MB/s -51%
4k q1 t1 write
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
373 (371.9min - 373.21max) MB/s +92%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
359 (324.09min - 358.58max) MB/s +84%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
294 (279.47min - 294.26max) MB/s +51%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
254 (252.76min - 253.97max) MB/s +31%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
233 (226.09min - 232.83max) MB/s +20%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
194.6 (177.67min - 194.62max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (49.9 - 280, n=85)
188.5 MB/s -3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (69.4 - 378, n=76, last 2 years)
172 MB/s -12%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
144 (137.81min - 144max) MB/s -26%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
125.8 (123.09min - 125.81max) MB/s -35%
4k q32 t16 read
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4071 (4066.2min - 4071.03max) MB/s +309%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3975 (3854.22min - 3974.57max) MB/s +299%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
3555 (3552.55min - 3555.1max) MB/s +257%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2863 (2854.77min - 2863.33max) MB/s +188%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (376 - 4185, n=85)
2579 MB/s +159%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
2390 (2226.95min - 2390.15max) MB/s +140%
Average of class Multimedia
  (295 - 4881, n=76, last 2 years)
1407 MB/s +41%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
995 (946.91min - 995.04max) MB/s
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
955 (920.63min - 955.11max) MB/s -4%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
803 (763.32min - 803.25max) MB/s -19%
4k q32 t16 write
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
3612 (3585.78min - 3612.01max) MB/s +530%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3509 (3396.26min - 3509.01max) MB/s +512%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3453 (3433.02min - 3452.67max) MB/s +503%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2687 (2662.73min - 2686.55max) MB/s +369%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (291 - 3559, n=85)
1957 MB/s +242%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
1542 (1501.74min - 1541.63max) MB/s +169%
Average of class Multimedia
  (192.1 - 4074, n=76, last 2 years)
1059 MB/s +85%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
573 (517.94min - 572.51max) MB/s
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
456 (436.66min - 455.51max) MB/s -20%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
328 (316.99min - 327.82max) MB/s -43%
AS SSD
Score Total
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
9380 Points +47%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9031 Points +42%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8935 Points +40%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2577 - 9147, n=85)
6855 Points +7%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
6791 Points +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
6635 Points +4%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6382 Points
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5598 Points -12%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2033 - 9972, n=73, last 2 years)
5101 Points -20%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
5046 Points -21%
Score Read
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
3634 Points +94%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3378 Points +81%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3363 Points +80%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
2619 Points +40%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2575 Points +38%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (983 - 3469, n=85)
2417 Points +29%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1869 Points
Average of class Multimedia
  (669 - 3501, n=73, last 2 years)
1646 Points -12%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1532 Points -18%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1474 Points -21%
Score Write
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3999 Points +9%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
3991 Points +9%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3919 Points +7%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3659 Points
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3464 Points -5%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (921 - 4043, n=85)
3272 Points -11%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2829 Points -23%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2820 Points -23%
Average of class Multimedia
  (656 - 4813, n=73, last 2 years)
2674 Points -27%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
2556 Points -30%
Seq Read
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
5588 MB/s +6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5563.48 MB/s +6%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5367 MB/s +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
5344.88 MB/s +2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5264.17 MB/s
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5251.18 MB/s 0%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2638 - 5621, n=85)
4891 MB/s -7%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4788.87 MB/s -9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1718 - 5730, n=73, last 2 years)
4257 MB/s -19%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2689 MB/s -49%
Seq Write
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
7663.27 MB/s +172%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4195 MB/s +49%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4045.87 MB/s +43%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3994 MB/s +42%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (1617 - 4526, n=85)
3320 MB/s +18%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
3267 MB/s +16%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2957.08 MB/s +5%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2822.05 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (414 - 5651, n=73, last 2 years)
2791 MB/s -1%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2633.81 MB/s -7%
4K Read
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
109.4 MB/s +31%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
83.61 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
81.3 MB/s -3%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
80.4 MB/s -4%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
76.65 MB/s -8%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (45.9 - 89.2, n=85)
72.4 MB/s -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
68.93 MB/s -18%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
65.56 MB/s -22%
Average of class Multimedia
  (28.7 - 98.5, n=73, last 2 years)
62 MB/s -26%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
52 MB/s -38%
4K Write
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
328.69 MB/s +44%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
321.6 MB/s +41%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
248.96 MB/s +9%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
228.72 MB/s
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
225.3 MB/s -1%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
204.95 MB/s -10%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
199.53 MB/s -13%
Average of class Multimedia
  (66.5 - 328, n=73, last 2 years)
190.9 MB/s -17%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (118.6 - 246, n=85)
186 MB/s -19%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
137.34 MB/s -40%
4K-64 Read
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
2966 MB/s +136%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2746 MB/s +118%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2740.24 MB/s +118%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2240.69 MB/s +78%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
2015.68 MB/s +60%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (421 - 2854, n=85)
1855 MB/s +47%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1258.57 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (350 - 2989, n=73, last 2 years)
1158 MB/s -8%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1001.57 MB/s -20%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
871.83 MB/s -31%
4K-64 Write
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3345.62 MB/s +6%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
3342 MB/s +6%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3294 MB/s +5%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3148.46 MB/s
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2968.9 MB/s -6%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (367 - 3451, n=85)
2754 MB/s -13%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2427.93 MB/s -23%
Average of class Multimedia
  (411 - 4265, n=73, last 2 years)
2204 MB/s -30%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2195.15 MB/s -30%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
1460.96 MB/s -54%
Access Time Read
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
0.056 ms * -17%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
0.056 ms * -17%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.018 - 0.15, n=73, last 2 years)
0.05499 ms * -15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
0.053 ms * -10%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.048 ms *
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.042 ms * +12%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
0.042 ms * +12%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.039 ms * +19%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (0.018 - 0.083, n=84)
0.03777 ms * +21%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.022 ms * +54%
Access Time Write
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
0.092 ms * -411%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.013 - 0.414, n=73, last 2 years)
0.06101 ms * -239%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (0.017 - 0.101, n=85)
0.03406 ms * -89%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
0.021 ms * -17%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.02 ms * -11%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.02 ms * -11%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.018 ms *
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.017 ms * +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
0.013 ms * +28%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
0.012 ms * +33%

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

035571010651420177521302485284031953550390542604615497053255680603563906745Tooltip
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW: Ø2642 (1802.5-7074.84)

请参考我们的 SSD和HDD基准测试页面了解更多的存储比较。

GPU性能

RTX 3070 Ti笔记本GPU在115W的TGP下运行。
RTX 3070 Ti笔记本GPU在115W的TGP下运行。

我们的ProArt StudioBook 16设备配备了一个115W的 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3070 Ti笔记本GPU与8GB GDDR6 VRAM。华硕没有指定该GPU的动态提升值。这款笔记本电脑默认使用Nvidia Studio驱动程序。

较低的TGP意味着ProArt StudioBook 16与使用150W RTX 3070 Ti的ROG Strix Scar 15相比,3DMark的整体性能要慢15%。然而,它仍然比105瓦的 RTX 3080 Ti笔记本GPU中的 Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5.

GPU-Z - NvidiaGeForce RTX 3070 Ti笔记本电脑GPU
GPU-Z - NvidiaGeForce RTX 3070 Ti笔记本电脑GPU
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
95.3 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
 
90.8 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
86.7 pt
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
84.8 pt
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
81 pt
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
77.3 pt
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
75 pt
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
65.8 pt
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
63.2 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
46.6 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
40257 Points +9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
39673 Points +8%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
36855 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (13799 - 42569, n=36)
35944 Points -2%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
33249 Points -10%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
31483 Points -15%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
27419 Points -26%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
25962 Points -30%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3505 - 60250, n=77, last 2 years)
20238 Points -45%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
13920 Points -62%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
150699 Points +100%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
141196 Points +87%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (33126 - 181005, n=25)
130456 Points +73%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
124813 Points +65%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
89390 Points +18%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
82730 Points +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
79498 Points +5%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
75497 Points
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
73574 Points -3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (14679 - 130614, n=38, last 2 years)
56887 Points -25%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
29292 Points +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
27562 Points +3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (22612 - 32550, n=37)
27554 Points +3%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
26718 Points 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
26715 Points
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
24580 Points -8%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
23767 Points -11%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
19597 Points -27%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
19496 Points -27%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1835 - 46022, n=80, last 2 years)
14545 Points -46%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
11227 Points +10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
11197 Points +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (8142 - 12324, n=37)
10478 Points +2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
10236 Points
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
10063 Points -2%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
9488 Points -7%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
8955 Points -13%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
7771 Points -24%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
7470 Points -27%
Average of class Multimedia
  (622 - 17620, n=81, last 2 years)
5488 Points -46%
3DMark 11 Performance
32806 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
75692 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
49147 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
23989 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
12966 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
10673 points
Help
3DMarkTime Spy 图形得分在电池上下降了56%。
3DMarkTime Spy 图形得分在电池上下降了56%。

3DMarkTime Spy 分数在电池上下降了56%。根据该基准,在1440p的情况下,这应该仍能使50+fps的游戏发挥在 战地5.

与基于RTX 3060的笔记本电脑相比,StudioBook 16的RTX 3070 Ti在Blender测试中显示出明显的优势 - RTX 3060笔记本GPU在Blender Optix和CUDA测试中分别慢了23%和35%。

Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Average of class Multimedia
  (19 - 105, n=45, last 2 years)
42.3 Seconds * -41%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
37 Seconds * -23%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
34 Seconds * -13%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
30 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (22 - 30, n=15)
25.3 Seconds * +16%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average of class Multimedia
  (32 - 181, n=47, last 2 years)
73.4 Seconds * -60%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
62 Seconds * -35%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
58 Seconds * -26%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
46 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (36 - 46, n=16)
41.4 Seconds * +10%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Average of class Multimedia
  (189 - 946, n=85, last 2 years)
428 Seconds * -50%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
404 Seconds * -42%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (285 - 459, n=16)
376 Seconds * -32%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
315 Seconds * -11%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
285 Seconds *

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

华硕并没有将ProArt StudioBook 16作为游戏笔记本来销售,但所提供的硬件肯定能够以体面的帧率运行现代游戏。对于这种配置的设备来说,累积的游戏性能是预期的,但与微星Creator Z17相比,总体上还是快了约9%。

它甚至在比较中以可感知的幅度超越了一些搭载RTX 3080 Ti的笔记本电脑。然而,请注意,这种推论只在1080p下有效,因为游戏性能更受CPU的限制。

Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
97.6 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS -1!
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
97.5 pt
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
89.4 pt
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
88.4 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
86.1 pt
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
82.3 pt
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
77 pt
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
64.9 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
51 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
111.1 (30min, 41.5P0.1, 74.7P1) fps +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
111 (95min, 95P1) fps +5%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
105.6 (95min, 95.44P1) fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
92.2 (19.1min, 45.8P0.1, 67.7P1) fps -13%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
90.5 fps -14%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
73.4 (68min) fps -30%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
70 fps -34%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
68 (78min) fps -36%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8 - 143.2, n=79, last 2 years)
53.9 fps -49%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
123.9 (6.53min, 76.9P1) fps +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
122.2 (8.62min, 83.3P1) fps
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
118.7 (16.4min, 76.9P1) fps -3%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
113 (20.6min, 76.9P1) fps -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
101.5 (21.1min, 71.4P1) fps -17%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
97.6 (9.44min, 66.7P1) fps -20%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
91.1 (21.1min, 58.8P1) fps -25%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
78.5 (7.51min, 55.6P1) fps -36%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.09 - 126.3, n=80, last 2 years)
53.6 fps -56%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
108 fps +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
106.9 fps
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
95.7 fps -10%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
93.7 fps -12%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
85.8 fps -20%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
85.4 fps -20%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
83.8 fps -22%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
78.2 fps -27%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.53 - 141.8, n=81, last 2 years)
51.4 fps -52%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
196.2 (70.2min, 148.7P1) fps +7%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
183.8 (60.2min, 134.8P1) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
182.4 (66.8min, 132.6P1) fps -1%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
160.6 (97.3min, 122.1P1) fps -13%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
156.7 (48.2min, 115.5P1) fps -15%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
151 (35.4min, 116P1) fps -18%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
139.1 (28min, 105.6P1) fps -24%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
132.5 (93.4min, 103.4P1) fps -28%
Average of class Multimedia
  (11 - 233, n=80, last 2 years)
88.5 fps -52%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
160 (139.4min) fps +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
159.2 (138.2min) fps
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
158.5 (138.4min) fps 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
158.4 (137.8min) fps -1%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
157.2 fps -1%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
135.1 (120.3min) fps -15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
111.3 (96.1min) fps -30%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
96.8 (84.6min) fps -39%
Average of class Multimedia
  (26.3 - 179.9, n=82, last 2 years)
96.2 fps -40%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
108.4 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
108 fps 0%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
107.6 fps -1%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
102 fps -6%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
94.7 fps -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
78.2 fps -28%
Average of class Multimedia
  (23 - 141.1, n=82, last 2 years)
66.7 fps -38%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
64.8 fps -40%

在更高的分辨率和光线追踪中,RTX 3080 Ti笔记本GPU的优势变得非常明显。然而,在大多数情况下,当涉及到光栅性能时,这两款GPU之间的差异仅在10%以内。

The Witcher 3
3840x2160 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
80.5 (27.4min, 44P0.1, 59.3P1) fps +10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
78 (68min, 69.14P1) fps +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (73.2 - 78, n=2)
75.6 fps +3%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
73.2 (65min, 65.86P1) fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
64 (20.4min, 29.2P0.1, 51.9P1) fps -13%
Average of class Multimedia
  (24.4 - 117, n=8, last 2 years)
57.4 fps -22%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
31.5 fps -57%
3840x2160 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
54.4 (30.3min, 36.3P0.1, 43.6P1) fps +12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
52.3 (47min, 47.57P1) fps +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (48.4 - 52.3, n=2)
50.4 fps +4%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
48.4 (45min, 45.57P1) fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
44.8 (14.7min, 26.1P0.1, 36.7P1) fps -7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (16.8 - 48.4, n=3, last 2 years)
31.7 fps -35%
Far Cry 5
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
107 (95min) fps +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
104 (75min) fps 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
104 (89min) fps
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
98 (88min) fps -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (77 - 111, n=15)
97.4 fps -6%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
93 fps -11%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
86 (77min) fps -17%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
83 fps -20%
Average of class Multimedia
  (26 - 117, n=30, last 2 years)
71.6 fps -31%
3840x2160 Ultra Preset AA:T
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
61 (55min) fps +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
60 (54min) fps +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (57 - 61, n=2)
59 fps +4%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
57 (50min) fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
45 (37min) fps -21%
Average of class Multimedia
  (18 - 59, n=6, last 2 years)
41 fps -28%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
40 fps -30%
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6
1920x1080 Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off)
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
49.9 (28.1min) fps +39%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
40.3 (29.8min) fps +13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (27.9 - 63, n=7)
36.8 fps +3%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
35.8 (26.1min) fps
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
34.7 (23.7min) fps -3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8.37 - 40, n=4, last 2 years)
25 fps -30%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
53.7 (33.5min) fps +5%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
51 (41.5min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (40 - 62, n=10)
50.1 fps -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
46 (29.7min) fps -10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (15.6 - 89, n=17, last 2 years)
43.4 fps -15%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
39.7 (26.6min) fps -22%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
35 (23.7min) fps -31%
3840x2160 Ultra Preset
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
28.1 (23.4min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (24.6 - 28.1, n=2)
26.4 fps -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
25.2 (16.6min) fps -10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
24.6 (16.9min) fps -12%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.57 - 45, n=5, last 2 years)
22 fps -22%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
19.6 (13min) fps -30%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
99.1 (29min) fps +22%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
81.3 (28.3min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (48.5 - 104, n=13)
79.2 fps -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
76 (31min) fps -7%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
73.2 (55.1min) fps -10%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
56 (26.7min) fps -31%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9.2 - 103, n=27, last 2 years)
51.4 fps -37%
GTA V
2560x1440 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
101.9 (4.88min, 66.7P1) fps +4%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
97.6 (10.6min, 66.7P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (72.7 - 108.7, n=22)
92.9 fps -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
92.2 (19.3min, 66.7P1) fps -6%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
90.7 (7.46min, 58.8P1) fps -7%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
82.7 (20.6min, 55.6P1) fps -15%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
76.4 (6.66min, 47.6P1) fps -22%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
74.9 (19.3min, 50P1) fps -23%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
68.8 (12.9min, 50P1) fps -30%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8.23 - 97.6, n=36, last 2 years)
64.2 fps -34%
3840x2160 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
59 (14.1min, 43.5P1) fps +21%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
51.4 (5.19min, 38.5P1) fps +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (48.7 - 51.4, n=2)
50.1 fps +3%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
48.7 (5.62min, 34.5P1) fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
41.8 (13min, 32.3P1) fps -14%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.03 - 71.6, n=8, last 2 years)
34.2 fps -30%
3840x2160 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:FX AF:8x
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
101.5 (6.19min, 76.9P1) fps +10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
98 (7.63min, 71.4P1) fps +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (92.1 - 98, n=2)
95.1 fps +3%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
92.1 (8.63min, 62.5P1) fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
78.2 (29min, 58.8P1) fps -15%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9.14 - 143, n=10, last 2 years)
70.3 fps -24%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
2560x1440 High Quality
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
84.6 fps +4%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
81.1 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (57.9 - 93, n=24)
76 fps -6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
72.2 fps -11%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
69.6 fps -14%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
64.8 fps -20%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
62.5 fps -23%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
62.1 fps -23%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
58.5 fps -28%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9.85 - 132.7, n=46, last 2 years)
51.1 fps -37%
3840x2160 High Quality
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
51.4 fps +11%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
46.2 fps
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
43.9 fps -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (39.6 - 46.6, n=5)
43.9 fps -5%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
40.1 fps -13%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
35 fps -24%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8.98 - 81.9, n=12, last 2 years)
33.8 fps -27%
X-Plane 11.11 - 3840x2160 high (fps_test=3)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (91.3 - 102, n=3)
95 fps +4%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
91.3 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
78.6 fps -14%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
75 fps -18%
Average of class Multimedia
  (19.3 - 114.7, n=15, last 2 years)
67.4 fps -26%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
66.1 fps -28%

Witcher 3 FPS图表

由于华硕出色的冷却效果,我们在用《Witcher 3 》 ,在1080p Ultra下进行压力测试时,没有看到可感知的帧数下降。

0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø105.7 (102-109)
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
GTA V (2015) 187.2 186.4 181.9 122.2 97.6 92.1
The Witcher 3 (2015) 428 316 195.9 105.6 73.2
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 190.6 174.7 165.6 159.2 122.6
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 211 140.1 106.9 81.1 46.2
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 155 136.1 108.4 91.3
Far Cry 5 (2018) 182 154 145 137 104 57
Strange Brigade (2018) 460 257 209 183.8 136.9 74.4
F1 2021 (2021) 371 252 208 119.8 93.5 53.5
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) 124.5 100.3 87.4 81.3 51 28.1

排放。标准剖面中的风扇噪音低于35 dB(A)

系统噪音

在全速设置下,即使在空闲状态下,风扇噪音声压级(SPL)也在50dB(A)和53dB(A)之间。因此,我们使用性能模式来对StudioBook 16的噪音水平进行更真实的评估。

我们记录了49分贝(A)的声压级,同时在1080p Ultra下运行TheWitcher 3,并在Prime95和FurMark的综合压力下。

华硕声称在标准模式下的噪音水平<40 dB(A),我们发现这是真的。在所有的测试条件下,标准模式的最大噪音水平保持在35dB(A)以下。

虽然标准模式一般可推荐用于非密集型使用,但你不会在此获得最高性能--我们观察到在此模式下,Cinebench R15多核得分下降了24%。

Ambient: 19.55 dB(A)
性能设置 空闲分贝(A) 负载平均分贝(A) 负载最大分贝(A) Witcher 3 分贝(A)
标准 19.54 27.84 34.31 34.60
性能 20.07 34.53 49.21 49.14
全速 53.26 53.24 49.32 49.20

Noise Level

Idle
20.07 / 20.07 / 20.07 dB(A)
Load
34.53 / 49.21 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 19.55 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2022.519.62515.919.33112.814.64012.216.35016.518.96318.623.18017.425.110017.23112518.725.516014.822.820020.927.825013.628.23151332.140011.133.45007.833.2630733.88007.535.610005.537.112505.238.21600538.820005.137.125005.537.631505.737.340006.538.4500073863007.13880006.936.7100007.135.5125006.733.6160006.227.8SPL19.649.2N0.26.9median 7median 35.5Delta3.54.6hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
各种性能模式下的负载平均风扇噪声曲线
各种性能模式下的负载平均风扇噪声曲线
各种性能模式下的负载最大风扇噪声曲线
各种性能模式下的负载最大风扇噪声曲线
Witcher 3 各种性能模式下的风扇噪音情况
Witcher 3 各种性能模式下的风扇噪音情况
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
M1 Max, M1 Max 24-Core GPU
Noise
-41%
-58%
-23%
-9%
off / environment *
19.55
26
-33%
26.86
-37%
26
-33%
24.8
-27%
Idle Minimum *
20.07
31.8
-58%
39.07
-95%
26
-30%
24.8
-24%
Idle Average *
20.07
31.8
-58%
39.07
-95%
27
-35%
24.8
-24%
Idle Maximum *
20.07
31.8
-58%
39.07
-95%
29
-44%
24.8
-24%
Load Average *
34.53
53.9
-56%
53.34
-54%
41
-19%
30.4
12%
Witcher 3 ultra *
49.1
53.9
-10%
56.6
-15%
48
2%
35.8
27%
Load Maximum *
49.21
54.9
-12%
56.6
-15%
50
-2%
49.5
-1%

* ... smaller is better

温度

华硕ProArt StudioBook 16 - 后部排气口
华硕ProArt StudioBook 16 - 后部排气口

由于风扇以最大速度持续运行,全速模式确保了负载下可容忍的表面温度。负载下较高的表面温度通常集中在机箱的顶部和左中部区域附近。

在Prime95和FurMark的综合负载下,顶部和底部的平均温度似乎在41℃左右。 Witcher 3在1080p Ultra下看到的平均表面温度相对较低,约为34℃。

触摸板和掌托区域在最大负荷下会变热,但在 Witcher 3的压力测试中则保持相对凉爽。

Max. Load
 41.6 °C41.2 °C40.6 °C 
 39.4 °C39.4 °C34 °C 
 34.6 °C35.6 °C30.8 °C 
Maximum: 41.6 °C
Average: 37.5 °C
40.6 °C41.4 °C34.6 °C
35.6 °C36.4 °C34.4 °C
31 °C31.4 °C38.2 °C
Maximum: 41.4 °C
Average: 36 °C
Power Supply (max.)  46.4 °C | Room Temperature 23 °C | Amprobe TMD-50 // Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.6 °C / 96.1 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-6.8 °C / -12.3 F).

虽然我们的压力测试代表了极端情况,但为了个人安全,我们建议只在标准设置下运行非密集型工作负载时在腿上使用ProArt StudioBook 16。

系统空闲 - 顶部
系统空闲 - 顶部
系统空闲 - 底部
系统空闲 - 底部
Prime95 + FurMark压力 - 上衣
Prime95 + FurMark压力 - 上衣
Prime95 + FurMark压力 - 底部
Prime95 + FurMark压力 - 底部
TheWitcher 3 stress - Top
TheWitcher 3 stress - Top
TheWitcher 3 stress - Bottom
TheWitcher 3 stress - Bottom
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
Apple M1 Max, Apple M1 Max 24-Core GPU
Heat
-28%
-19%
-12%
5%
Maximum Upper Side *
41.6
63.9
-54%
42.6
-2%
45
-8%
49.2
-18%
Maximum Bottom *
41.4
68
-64%
50.2
-21%
50
-21%
44.1
-7%
Idle Upper Side *
31.8
28.3
11%
36.2
-14%
33
-4%
23.5
26%
Idle Bottom *
29.2
30.2
-3%
40.2
-38%
33
-13%
23.6
19%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

华硕使用双风扇、六热管冷却系统和一个液态金属接口的CPU,以保持ProArt StudioBook 16的运行温度。

运行Prime95原地大型FFT时,Core i9-12900H达到4.2GHz,核心温度达到91℃,封装功率达到115W。

华硕ProArt StudioBook 16采用双风扇六热管散热系统
华硕ProArt StudioBook 16采用双风扇六热管散热系统

在FurMark中,CPU的平均时钟下降到2.09 GHz,这为RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU提供了空间,使其峰值达到1,635 MHz。CPU和GPU都能够接近其115W的功率目标,尽管是暂时的。酷睿i9-12900H的平均封装功率被降低到52W,使RTX 3070 Ti的功耗达到91W。

Witcher 3,在1080p Ultra下呈现出一个更现实的压力条件。在这里,CPU的平均时钟在2.5GHz左右徘徊,但GPU能够持续执行提升时钟,同时在整个运行过程中以113W的TGP达到最大值。

系统空闲
系统空闲
Prime95 + FurMark压力
Prime95 + FurMark压力
TheWitcher 3 stress
TheWitcher 3 stress
Prime95压力下的CPU/GPU时钟、温度和功率变化
Prime95压力下的CPU/GPU时钟、温度和功率变化
在Prime95 + FurMark压力下,CPU/GPU的时钟、温度和功率变化
在Prime95 + FurMark压力下,CPU/GPU的时钟、温度和功率变化
在《Witcher 3 》的压力下,CPU/GPU的时钟、温度和功率变化。
在《Witcher 3 》的压力下,CPU/GPU的时钟、温度和功率变化。
压力测试 CPU时钟(GHz) GPU时钟(MHz) CPU平均温度(℃) GPU平均温度(℃)
系统空闲 2.79 - 54 28.7
Prime95 3.03 - 82 30.9
Prime95 + FurMark 2.13 900 69 63.9
TheWitcher 3 3.78 1,635 55 61.6

发言人

华硕为ProArt StudioBook 16配备了由智能放大器驱动的哈曼卡顿认证的板载立体声扬声器。音频子系统还支持Dolby Atmos和具有Hi-Res Audio认证的ESS Sabre DAC,用于驱动高阻抗耳机。

80.06 dB(A)的峰值响度对于一个普通大小的房间来说是足够的。我们观察到一个降低但仍然是线性的低音响应,以及良好的中音和高音。从主观上讲,板载的扬声器对于休闲聆听来说是不错的。

对于那些想要提高音频保真度的人来说,可以使用3.5毫米音频插孔和蓝牙5.0。

ProArt StudioBook 16的扬声器具有良好的响度和适当的频率响应
ProArt StudioBook 16的扬声器具有良好的响度和适当的频率响应
粉红噪声示意图
粉红噪声示意图
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2022.522.42515.919.23112.811.24012.214.95016.521.96318.628.28017.435.910017.245.312518.748.316014.849.520020.954.325013.657.73151358.640011.157.65007.859.7630759.58007.567.510005.565.812505.268.41600572.820005.16825005.564.331505.768.340006.570.35000765.963007.168.480006.966100007.167.8125006.769.6160006.260.3SPL19.680.1N0.247.6median 7median 65.8Delta3.5626.325.821.422.12624.925.127.622.532.523.448.72655.818.860.922.167.2267019.372.317.674.217.774.319.575.31571.711.871.311.27410.574.21072.710.17210.67210.97511.374.811.671.71269.71269.612.371.112.669.61270.111.269.824.784.70.666.6median 12median 71.73.42.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZWApple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理。负载下最大功率为240W的电源

消耗功率

我们记录的最大功耗为241W,因此提供的240W适配器应该足以让ProArt StudioBook 16完成最苛刻的任务。墙上的耗电量让人想起我们之前在压力测试中看到的模式。

尽管如此,ProArt StudioBook 16并没有像微星Creator Z17那样遭受高闲置消耗。ROG Strix Scar 15在怠速时更经济,但在负载下的消耗比StudioBook 16高。

不足为奇的是 Apple MacBook Pro 14带M1 Max的MacBook Pro 14是这次比较中最节俭的能源消耗者。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.13 / 0.098 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 12.6 / 17.41 / 23.12 Watt
Load midlight 117.5 / 241.36 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, OLED, 3840x2400, 16"
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, IPS, 2560x1600, 17"
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, IPS-level, 2560x1440, 15.6"
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
M1 Max, M1 Max 24-Core GPU, Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.2"
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
 
Average of class Multimedia
 
Power Consumption
-70%
9%
16%
52%
-10%
43%
Idle Minimum *
12.6
34.6
-175%
7.56
40%
10.3
18%
3.2
75%
14.2 ?(4 - 34.6, n=27)
-13%
Idle Average *
17.41
43
-147%
13.5
22%
16
8%
12.6
28%
19.9 ?(8.9 - 43, n=27)
-14%
Idle Maximum *
23.12
44.9
-94%
16.87
27%
24
-4%
13
44%
26.2 ?(14.3 - 47.3, n=27)
-13%
Load Average *
117.5
145
-23%
128.9
-10%
85.4
27%
57.9
51%
125.8 ?(87.2 - 202, n=27)
-7%
Witcher 3 ultra *
172.6
152.4
12%
196.2
-14%
132.2
23%
76.3
56%
Load Maximum *
241.36
220
9%
274.86
-14%
181.9
25%
97.7
60%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: The Witcher 3 / Stress test

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240Tooltip
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø172.6 (168.8-179.4)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø202 (172.5-241)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø117.5 (107.6-139.6)

Power Consumption: External monitor

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190Tooltip
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø180 (112.1-199)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø181.5 (179.9-183.5)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø68 (60.9-152)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø182.7 (179.4-184.6)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW; Cinebench R20 Single (external Monitor): Ø66.6 (61.2-77.9)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW; Cinebench R20 Multi (external Monitor): Ø181.3 (178.1-183.3)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø150.6 (146.8-169.3)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø169.1 (164.2-175.7)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø40.5 (37.5-46.3)

电池寿命

虽然ProArt StudioBook 16在电池运行时间方面无法与MacBook Pro相提并论,但90瓦时的锂离子电池组确保了在你不得不伸手去拿充电器之前,在路上有相当长的寿命。所有的电池测试都是在标准模式下进行的。

华硕宣传在视频播放时有10小时的电池运行时间,我们在150尼特的条件下进行H.264 1080p视频循环测试,离9:45大关只差一点。配备M1 Max的MacBook Pro 14在150尼特的屏幕亮度下,在我们的标准化Wi-Fi测试中提供了54%的运行时间。

如果需要,可以拧开并更换电池。

可拆卸的90WHr电池提供了适当的运行时间
可拆卸的90WHr电池提供了适当的运行时间
Battery Runtime
Witcher 3 ultra 150cd
1h 17min
WiFi Websurfing
7h 32.2min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
5h 40min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9h 42min
Load (maximum brightness)
0h 51min
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 71 Wh
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
M1 Max, M1 Max 24-Core GPU, 69.9 Wh
Average of class Multimedia
 
Battery Runtime
30%
-2%
-14%
40%
44%
H.264
582
329
-43%
510
-12%
726
25%
WiFi v1.3
452.2
332
-27%
501.4
11%
387
-14%
697
54%
Witcher 3 ultra
77
70
-9%
Load
51
132
159%
52
2%

Pros

+ 坚固的结构
+ 华硕拨号支持的应用程序,方便快捷
+ 明亮的4K OLED与杜比视界HDR
+ 相对无碍的CPU和GPU性能
+ 可容忍的热量和噪音排放

Cons

- Wi-Fi 6E速度慢,SD卡吞吐量一般
- 可怜的720p网络摄像头
- 触摸板灵敏度太高
- 持续负载下的SSD节流
- 设备设置散落在MyAsus和ProArt Creator Hub应用程序中

评语:近乎完美的移动内容创作

华硕ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW。评测单位由华硕印度公司提供。
华硕ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW。评测单位由华硕印度公司提供。

华硕ProArt StudioBook 16试图从越来越多的以创作者为中心的笔记本电脑中脱颖而出,而且它成功地做到了这一点,令人信服。

ProArt StudioBook的设计是简约的,但散发着优雅的气息。机箱建造得很好,盖子可以用一根手指打开,显示屏的边框很薄,增加了沉浸感。

可定制的华硕表盘在支持的应用程序中非常方便,对于那些希望获得模拟式输入便利的人来说。

华硕在StudioBook 16中使用了高质量的三星OLED面板。它没有吹嘘高刷新率,但色彩准确性和接近100%的sRGB、Adobe RGB和Display P3色彩空间覆盖率将受到创作者的欢迎。该显示器在低亮度水平上受到PWM的影响,但在50%以上的亮度上使用直流调光,应该还是很容易看清的。

华硕ProArt StudioBook 16几乎提供了内容创作者对这个价格的笔记本电脑所期望的一切。凭借顶级性能的酷睿i9-12900H和RTX 3070 Ti笔记本GPU,加上明亮、生动的OLED面板和华硕表盘的便利性,ProArt StudioBook 16有可能使你远离MacBook Pro。

使用Core i9-12900HRTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU 组合的性能并没有带来任何惊喜。事实上,它甚至超越了它的竞争对手,如MSI Creator Z17Ryzen 9 6900HX- poweredAsus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ,至少在CPU性能方面。

RTX 3070 Ti笔记本电脑的GPU对于QHD的游戏来说是很好的,对于为内容创作应用提供足够的能量来说应该是绰绰有余,特别是使用Nvidia Studio驱动程序。

华硕的目标显然是MacBook Pro 人群,在原始性能方面,ProArt StudioBook 16远远领先于来自库比蒂诺的竞争对手。也就是说,基于Apple 芯片的MacBooks在远离墙壁的性能和电池寿命方面确实具有架构优势。

此外,正如在Affinity Photo 2基准测试中所看到的,专门为Apple 硅片优化的应用程序可以显示出明显优于其x86版本的性能。

然而,华硕ProArt StudioBook 16并非没有一些缺点。Wi-Fi性能可以使用一些稳定性,在6GHz 6E频段增加吞吐量。考虑到其目标人群,SD卡的性能也可以大大改善。

三键触摸板是你能在Windows笔记本电脑上得到的最好的触摸板之一,但在开箱后的敏感度方面还需要很多微调。90WHr电池提供了高于平均水平的运行时间,但这只是在测试条件下。

综上所述,华硕ProArt StudioBook 16将外形和功能与同样良好的性能结合起来,如果价格没有问题的话,它绝对值得内容创作者考虑。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

测试的华硕ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600配置为酷睿i9-12900H和RTX 3070 Ti笔记本GPU,在印度亚马逊上售价为2,49,990(约3,015美元)。.

在美国,配备酷睿i7-12700H、RTX 3070 Ti笔记本GPU、16GB内存和2TB NVMe存储的ProArt StudioBook 16,在美国亚马逊上可以买到2,549美元。百思买的价格约为2,699.99美元。.

买家还可以选择ProArt StudioBook 16 SKU,其特点是 Nvidia RTX A3000 笔记本电脑GPU在美国亚马逊网站,价格为2,971美元。.

Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW - 02/25/2023 v7 (old)
Vaidyanathan Subramaniam

Chassis
94 / 98 → 96%
Keyboard
92%
Pointing Device
86%
Connectivity
58 / 80 → 73%
Weight
60 / 20-72 → 78%
Battery
80 / 95 → 84%
Display
89%
Games Performance
99 / 90 → 100%
Application Performance
96 / 90 → 100%
Temperature
90%
Noise
89 / 95 → 94%
Audio
86%
Camera
20 / 85 → 24%
Average
80%
89%
Multimedia - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华硕ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW评论。为内容创作者提供绝对的MacBook Pro替代品
Vaidyanathan Subramaniam, 2023-02-26 (Update: 2023-02-26)