Razer Blade 17笔记本电脑回顾。RTX 3070 Ti或RTX 3080 Ti--哪个是卓越的刀片?
我们已经审查了Razer Blade 17 2022与RTX 3080 Ti在四月初,配备RTX 3070 Ti的型号,价格为3500欧元(约3,682美元),现在已经来到我们身边。因此,我们将比较两者的性能,看看4300欧元(约合人民币4524元)的较贵价格对于顶级型号是否值得。
由于这款笔记本电脑几乎没有其他变化,我们将参考 对配备RTX 3080 Ti的型号的评论并省略关于机箱和所有其他没有修改的部分。
除了顶级型号外,我们还与我们系统中发现的其他配备RTX 3070 Ti的17英寸游戏笔记本电脑的性能进行比较。唯一的问题是--我们的系统中还没有其他配备RTX 3070 Ti的17英寸笔记本电脑。出于这个原因,我们将包括以下15英寸和16英寸的比较模型。的 联想Legion 5 Pro 16 G7WWW.STEELT.CNMSI Vector GP66 12UGS, 微星微星Stealth GS66 12UGS以及前者,即采用 CPU和非Ti RTX 3070的Razer Blade 17。 Razer Blade 17采用Tiger Lake CPU和非Ti RTX 3070。.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
90.1 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 19.9 mm | 17.30" | 2560x1440 | |
91.2 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2022 | Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 19.9 mm | 17.30" | 2560x1440 | |
89.4 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 19.9 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
88 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2022 | Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.6 kg | 26.6 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
86.9 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2022 | MSI Vector GP66 12UGS i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 23.4 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
84.5 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2022 | MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.2 kg | 19.8 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 纤薄,完全由金属制成
连接性 - 2x Thunderbolt 4
SD卡阅读器
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 (AV Pro V60) | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti (AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=88, last 2 years) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 (AV Pro V60) | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti (AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=89, last 2 years) |
沟通
网络摄像头
输入设备 - 特殊功能照明不佳
键盘
再谈一谈键盘的背光灯。只有主要功能的按键才会被照亮。在所有的东西中,F键的次要功能非常小,标签也很模糊,而且它们没有被照亮,所以你必须在黑暗的环境中努力寻找特殊功能,即使是在键盘背光开启的情况下。例如,我们想在黑暗环境中调低显示器的亮度,但在黑暗环境中几乎找不到相应的键。
我们很希望Razer能在这方面有所改进,因为对应于大音量/小音量、打印、显示亮度等功能的按键在黑暗中几乎看不到,因为它们没有被照亮,而且标签非常小,也是苍白的灰色。
显示 - 良好的色彩空间覆盖
我们的配置配备了与配备RTX 3080 Ti的变体相同的2560x1440像素的哑光京东方IPS显示屏。
然而,我们的模型有一个稍微好一点的亮度分布,为82%。略高于300尼特的平均亮度还算不错。
由于黑值相对较高,对比度并不突出,但仍在限度之内。从主观的角度来看,由于分辨率高,显示器看起来非常清晰,而且提供了吸引人的颜色。
响应时间对于一台游戏笔记本来说是合适的。屏幕出血只在右侧边缘存在,而且没有PWM。
|
Brightness Distribution: 82 %
Center on Battery: 338 cd/m²
Contrast: 758:1 (Black: 0.45 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.16 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 3
ΔE Greyscale 5.09 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
85.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.48
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) BOE CQ NE173QHM-NZ1 (BOE09F9), IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti BOE NE173QHM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 AU Optronics B173HAN05.4, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti NE160QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | MSI Vector GP66 12UGS BOE NE156FHM-NZ3, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Sharp LQ156T1JW04 (SHP153C), IPS-Level, 2560x1440, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 1% | -14% | -16% | -15% | -1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 97.9 | 98.7 1% | 71.7 -27% | 68.7 -30% | 70.1 -28% | 96.4 -2% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 99.9 0% | 98.8 -1% | 97.6 -2% | 99.5 0% | 99.7 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 85.5 | 86.2 1% | 73.6 -14% | 70.9 -17% | 72.1 -16% | 85.6 0% |
Response Times | -9% | 47% | 8% | 38% | 43% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 15.2 ? | 17.6 ? -16% | 4.2 ? 72% | 17.6 ? -16% | 5.8 ? 62% | 6 ? 61% |
Response Time Black / White * | 11.2 ? | 11.4 ? -2% | 8.8 ? 21% | 7.6 ? 32% | 9.6 ? 14% | 8.4 ? 25% |
PWM Frequency | ||||||
Screen | 19% | 2% | 44% | 25% | 10% | |
Brightness middle | 341 | 335.9 -1% | 323.3 -5% | 502 47% | 353.1 4% | 272 -20% |
Brightness | 308 | 294 -5% | 315 2% | 491 59% | 325 6% | 253 -18% |
Brightness Distribution | 82 | 75 -9% | 91 11% | 91 11% | 85 4% | 87 6% |
Black Level * | 0.45 | 0.38 16% | 0.33 27% | 0.37 18% | 0.38 16% | 0.25 44% |
Contrast | 758 | 884 17% | 980 29% | 1357 79% | 929 23% | 1088 44% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.16 | 2.82 32% | 4.59 -10% | 2.7 35% | 2.24 46% | 3.73 10% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.14 | 5.04 38% | 10.82 -33% | 4.5 45% | 5 39% | 9.43 -16% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3 | 1.4 53% | 1.4 53% | 1.02 66% | 0.98 67% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.09 | 1.7 67% | 7.9 -55% | 2.7 47% | 4 21% | 6.5 -28% |
Gamma | 2.48 89% | 2.14 103% | 2.28 96% | 2.44 90% | 2.24 98% | 2.172 101% |
CCT | 6884 94% | 6382 102% | 5941 109% | 6326 103% | 6864 95% | 6485 100% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 4% /
11% | 12% /
5% | 12% /
26% | 16% /
18% | 17% /
12% |
* ... smaller is better
sRGB和Display P3都几乎完全覆盖。AdobeRGB也覆盖了约86%。这使得该显示器非常适合专业图像和视频编辑人员使用。
该显示器在开箱时已经被校准得相当好。然而,一个新的校准可以更明显地减少色彩偏差。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.8 ms rise | |
↘ 5.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
15.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.4 ms rise | |
↘ 7.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
由于亮度约为300尼特,加上哑光表面,只要你在阴凉处并从有利的角度观看屏幕,户外使用是可能的。然而,如果你倾斜设备或从一个倾斜的角度看它,乐趣很快就会结束。
当从极端角度观看时,会失去一些亮度,但总的来说,作为典型的IPS面板,可视角度的稳定性很好。
性能 - 仍然很高
由于其强大的组件,Razer Blade主要适用于游戏玩家和内容创作者。我们预计RTX 3070 Ti的温度和噪音水平会比配备RTX 3080 Ti的型号略好。作为回报,性能应该有轻微下降。我们目前的审查样本在基准测试中也不应该有任何问题。
测试条件
为了获得最佳基准测试结果,我们在Razer Synapse软件中选择自定义模式,并将CPU和GPU的滑块最大化。
Razer支持高级优化,你也可以手动启用dGPU,但我们不会这样做。
处理器
ǞǞǞ英特尔酷睿i7-12800H有14个核心,总共有20个线程。在这种情况下,单个P核的时钟频率可以达到4.8 GHz,而基本时钟速度在1.8(E核)和2.4 GHz(P核)之间。它应该有能力处理任何任务。
在Cinebench循环中,CPU在前两次运行中管理的TDP约为100瓦特。在随后的运行中,它最多只在很短的时间内达到85瓦,之后在一次运行中该数值下降到60瓦左右。请注意,这适用于Razer Synapse中 "Boost "的CPU。在正常设置下,CPU应该达到45瓦左右。
总的来说,刀锋战士略高于预期水平。前代产品被击败了约20%。但特别是Legion 5显示了更好的结果。其强大的i7-12700H甚至让配备i9的机型望尘莫及。
该CPU在电池供电的情况下只达到了35瓦的TDP。相应地,Cinebench R15得分下降到1466分,几乎下降了45%!这也是一个很好的例子。
Cinebench R15 Multi endurance test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 -2! |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=192, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (9777 - 16597, n=5) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Average of class Gaming (1088 - 2235, n=190, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (1796 - 1859, n=5) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=190, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (3741 - 6433, n=5) | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Average of class Gaming (427 - 856, n=190, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (690 - 714, n=5) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (1566 - 2697, n=5) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (176.6 - 318, n=194, last 2 years) | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (242 - 269, n=5) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (192 - 306, n=5) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=185, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=189, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (44553 - 68930, n=5) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average of class Gaming (4168 - 7581, n=189, last 2 years) | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (5726 - 5976, n=5) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=190, last 2 years) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (9607 - 12940, n=5) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=190, last 2 years) | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (1739 - 1842, n=5) | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=189, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (11.7 - 19.4, n=5) | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (41.3 - 51.5, n=5) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (0.4442 - 0.4715, n=5) | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=190, last 2 years) | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 -9! |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (5839 - 15206, n=5) | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (27801 - 80002, n=5) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (2013 - 3684, n=5) | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=186, last 2 years) | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (85965 - 108084, n=5) | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (7027 - 9658, n=5) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (15765 - 38179, n=5) | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (55371 - 73928, n=5) | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (701 - 1047, n=5) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (3257 - 8559, n=5) | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=187, last 2 years) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (31329 - 40992, n=5) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS |
系统性能
系统性能令人满意,但与基于Tiger Lake 的前辈相比,我们没有观察到积极的效果。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=167, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU () |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=166, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU () | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=166, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU () |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=166, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU () | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=150, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU () |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=150, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU () |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=150, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU () |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=150, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU () |
PCMark 10 Score | 7248 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (48643 - 62522, n=5) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (56629 - 66199, n=5) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=186, last 2 years) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (50923 - 66074, n=5) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=186, last 2 years) | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (89.3 - 95.2, n=5) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
LatencyMon仅在打开Edge浏览器时就已经记录了轻微的延迟,当我们打开多个标签时,主页上的延迟会增加。
随后播放我们的4K/60帧的YouTube视频时,延迟进一步增加,但视频的渲染至少没有丢帧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 |
* ... smaller is better
储存
Razer在我们的审查配置中安装了一块三星NVMe固态硬盘,拥有1TB的存储空间。该固态硬盘在我们的 硬盘/SSD基准测试文章中排名第七,使其成为目前最快的型号之一。
相比之下,该存储解决方案也实现了非常好的速率,但同一型号在Legion 。连续的性能也是无可指责的。
* ... smaller is better
Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
现在,我们来看看,在内置的RTX 3070 Ti和RTX 3080 Ti在顶级配置中是否存在差距,如果存在,我们会发现它有多大。
在合成的3DMark基准测试中,RTX 3080 Ti的性能比配备RTX 3070 Ti的刀片快约12%至20%,这是一个明显的差异。
一个新的Fire Strike ,在电池供电的情况下运行,显示出77.5%的性能损失,得分只有4427分,而不是插电时的24111分!
3DMark 11 Performance | 31308 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 52870 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 24111 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 10868 points | |
Help |
游戏性能
不用说,RTX 3070 Ti能够以原生分辨率和高细节流畅地运行几乎任何游戏。不过,对于性能爱好者来说,购买RTX 3080 Ti变体,可以从系统中多获得多少帧的问题就出现了。
在《Witcher 3》中,RTX 3080 Ti的优势在全高清和最大细节下为12%。在《Far Cry 5》中,在相同的设置下,差距缩小到8%。在2K中,领先优势为18%。
我们在《赛博朋克》中测得的差异非常大。虽然两张卡在全高清下几乎是一样的,但我们只在2K下测量到较大的差异,在2K下是相当大的22%。
总的来说,Blade 17没有从其RTX 3070 Ti中提取最大的能量,但与RTX 3080 Ti模型的差异在全高清时仍然相当小。然而,RTX 3080 Ti在刀锋的原生分辨率上实现了明显的领先,尽管大多数游戏也应该在RTX 3070上顺利运行。购买更好的版本可能只有在你计划在外部4K显示器上玩时才有意义。
GTA V | |
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Average of class Gaming (24.2 - 187.1, n=145, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (80 - 181.9, n=28) | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=170, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (44 - 123.9, n=36) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
2560x1440 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Average of class Gaming (36.9 - 160.6, n=112, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (72.7 - 108.7, n=22) |
Witcher 3,在一个小时内,帧率只从110帧左右下降到107帧,可以忽略不计。
The Witcher 3 FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 182.6 | 176.8 | 164.2 | 103.8 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 339 | 296.4 | 173.4 | 111.6 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 173.6 | 159.3 | 150 | 141.6 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 158.4 | 134.3 | 103.2 | 78.5 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 138.6 | 117.7 | 95.8 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 155 | 128 | 123 | 116 | 102 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 369 | 258 | 217 | 191.7 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 117 | 113 | 105 | 104 | 49 |
排放--略微偏冷
噪声排放
略低的性能使我们期望有一个更安静、更冷的系统。
在空闲使用时,即使使用最大性能设置,风扇通常也是不活跃的。Razer Blade是在负载下更安静的设备之一,但与配备RTX 3080 Ti的模型相比,没有积极的差异。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23 / 23 / 23 dB(A) |
Load |
| 36.92 / 50 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23 dB(A) |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | MSI Vector GP66 12UGS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H | MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -3% | -8% | -17% | -8% | -20% | |
off / environment * | 23 | 23.3 -1% | 24.2 -5% | 24.6 -7% | 22.9 -0% | 24 -4% |
Idle Minimum * | 23 | 23.3 -1% | 24.7 -7% | 28.4 -23% | 23.4 -2% | 31 -35% |
Idle Average * | 23 | 23.3 -1% | 24.7 -7% | 28.4 -23% | 23.4 -2% | 32 -39% |
Idle Maximum * | 23 | 26.3 -14% | 24.7 -7% | 28.4 -23% | 27.4 -19% | 35 -52% |
Load Average * | 36.92 | 38.2 -3% | 44.3 -20% | 49.4 -34% | 36 2% | 48 -30% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 50 | 50.9 -2% | 56.3 -13% | 49.4 1% | 58.2 -16% | 43 14% |
Load Maximum * | 50 | 49.1 2% | 47.7 5% | 54.7 -9% | 58 -16% | 48 4% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
掌托至少始终保持凉爽,而金属外壳将废热传导到外面,效果特别好。而事实上,RTX 3070 Ti Blade确实比其加强版的同类产品保持了一定的温度,无论是在空闲使用还是在负载下。在游戏过程中,45℃(约113°F)的热点是非常适中的。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.3 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-6.1 °C / -11 F).
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | MSI Vector GP66 12UGS Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -10% | -5% | -6% | -3% | -5% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 43 | 46 -7% | 41 5% | 45.3 -5% | 40.2 7% | 54 -26% |
Maximum Bottom * | 44 | 46.8 -6% | 47.2 -7% | 61.2 -39% | 43.8 -0% | 59 -34% |
Idle Upper Side * | 32 | 36.2 -13% | 33.2 -4% | 28.6 11% | 34.8 -9% | 26 19% |
Idle Bottom * | 34 | 38.6 -14% | 39 -15% | 31.4 8% | 37 -9% | 27 21% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
核心在3.2GHz左右开始我们的压力测试。只需要很短的时间,时钟速度就会稳定在2.2GHz左右,之后就会保持相当稳定。温度达到适中的75°C(约167°C),最高温度86°C(约187°F)也只达到很短的时间。
GPU的核心时钟在1.1和1.8GHz之间波动相当强烈。此外,内存时钟速度不时地从1,750 MHz降至1,500 MHz。GPU的温度低于70℃(约158°F)。
因此,CPU和GPU仍有余量,温度保持在一个非常适中的水平。
CPU时钟速度(GHz) | GPU时钟速度(MHz) | CPU平均温度(℃) | GPU平均温度(℃) | |
系统空闲 | 2.3 | 1,410 | 45 (~113 °F) | 50 (~122 °F) |
Prime95 + FurMark压力 | 2.2 | 1,482 | 74 (~165 °F) | 67 (~153 °F) |
发言人
Razer Blade的扬声器在同类比较中属于较好的一种。虽然低音有改进的余地,但它不像大多数其他笔记本电脑那样单薄和尖锐。中音和高音非常平衡,扬声器也可以变得相当响亮。
只有一个音频插孔形式的组合耳机端口可用于外部音频设备的模拟连接。
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.67 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理--比顶级车型更节俭
能源消耗
当涉及到功耗时,GPU的差异真的变得很明显。在所有情况下,包括在空闲使用时,RTX 3070 Ti配置的功耗明显低于其RTX 3080 Ti对应物。
在玩《Witcher 3》时,我们的评测模型消耗了大约25瓦,短期绝对最大消耗量也大致降低了相同的数量。在我们的压力测试中,消耗量短暂地飙升至248瓦,但平均为204瓦。
280瓦的电源适配器,被Razer特别缩小了尺寸,在我们的配置中仍然可用,这意味着总是有足够的电力储备。
Idle | 14.4 / 20 / 21.5 Watt |
Load |
119 / 248 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | MSI Vector GP66 12UGS i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, , IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN810 1TB, IPS-Level, 2560x1440, 15.6" | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -69% | -25% | 9% | -25% | 14% | -5% | -1% | |
Idle Minimum * | 14.4 | 29.8 -107% | 20.9 -45% | 8.6 40% | 17.5 -22% | 11 24% | 14.2 ? 1% | 13.5 ? 6% |
Idle Average * | 20 | 37.1 -86% | 25.1 -26% | 17.6 12% | 20.1 -1% | 16 20% | 19.9 ? -0% | 18.9 ? 5% |
Idle Maximum * | 21.5 | 60.8 -183% | 45 -109% | 18.5 14% | 47.3 -120% | 23 -7% | 26.2 ? -22% | 26.8 ? -25% |
Load Average * | 119 | 135.3 -14% | 102 14% | 110 8% | 107.3 10% | 110 8% | 125.8 ? -6% | 106.7 ? 10% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 218 | 243 -11% | 189 13% | 227 -4% | 225 -3% | 151 31% | ||
Load Maximum * | 248 | 273.1 -10% | 234.8 5% | 294.6 -19% | 277.7 -12% | 230 7% | 248 ? -0% | 249 ? -0% |
* ... smaller is better
Energy consumption during The Witcher 3 / stress test
Energy consumption with an external monitor
电池寿命
在我们的模型中,电池并没有减少;Razer为它配备了82Wh。然而,只有在负载下才能注意到积极的效果。在浏览网页或观看视频时,只有内部的GPU处于活动状态,所以电池运行时间在这里没有明显差异。
根据亮度设置,你可以浏览网页4至近6小时。你可以计划一个电影之夜,时间差不多。为了获得更长的运行时间,在电池供电的情况下将刷新率从240改为60赫兹是很重要的。供参考。在降低亮度的情况下使用Wi-Fi,运行时间的差异是240赫兹下274分钟,而60赫兹下353分钟。所示的视频值是在240赫兹下产生的。
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 82 Wh | Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 82 Wh | Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 70 Wh | Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | MSI Vector GP66 12UGS i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 65 Wh | MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -22% | -15% | -15% | -24% | -10% | 8% | |
H.264 | 295 | 377 28% | 408 ? 38% | ||||
WiFi v1.3 | 353 | 330 -7% | 314 -11% | 326 -8% | 342 -3% | 324 -8% | 375 ? 6% |
Load | 108 | 68 -37% | 88 -19% | 37 -66% | 61 -44% | 96 -11% | 85.4 ? -21% |
Reader / Idle | 482 | 404 | 473 | 467 | 565 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 更加凉爽,更加节俭
Razer Blade也是一款非常值得推荐的游戏和生产力笔记本电脑,配备RTX 3070 Ti。也许它甚至比带有RTX 3080 Ti的顶级配置更值得推荐,因为我们的评测模型仍然更冷,最重要的是,它更节俭,同时仍然能够顺利地显示所有游戏,达到原生分辨率。
你很难找到对刀片的任何真正的批评点。如果有一个网络摄像头盖就好了,而且你必须寻找特殊的按键,比如控制显示屏亮度的按键,在黑暗中使用放大镜。RTX 3070 Ti在所有游戏中的表现并不稳定,它有时会被拥有相同GPU的笔记本电脑所超越。压力测试显示,在热节流方面,仍会有足够的储备可用于实现更高的3D性能。
配备RTX 3070 Ti的Razer Blade 17是一款非常强大和彻底值得推荐的笔记本电脑,只要你有必要的消费能力。
就质量而言,17英寸刀锋的替代品目前仍然很少。如果你可以选择更小的东西,你应该看一下联想Legion 5 Pro 16 G7其16英寸QHD显示屏和相同的GPU,因为它非常好,性能略高。然而,它也比刀锋战士厚得多。但它也明显更便宜。
价格和可用性
在撰写本文时,你可以在亚马逊上找到我们的审查配置,价格为3199美元.
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
- 05/09/2022 v7 (old)
Christian Hintze