Realme 14 Pro+ 智能手机评测：功能丰富的中端手机，配备超大电池和明亮的 OLED 屏幕
瓦时怪物
如果你正在寻找一款电池容量充足、摄像头出色、OLED 显示屏生动的中端手机，那么搭载骁龙 7s Gen 3 处理器的 Realme 14 Pro Plus 5G 是一个非常不错的选择。这款智能手机的亮点包括 6000 毫安时电池和潜望式变焦镜头等。我们将在这篇评测中了解 Realme 14 Pro Plus 的整体表现有多令人信服。Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
结论性价比高，功能齐全
花这么少的钱就能买到潜望镜变焦相机的情况并不多见。Realme 14 Pro+ 5G 还拥有精美的设计、明亮的 OLED 屏幕、充足的内存和快速的 Wi-Fi 功能。
它支持多种 4G 和 5G 频率，即使在旅行中也能可靠运行，骁龙 7s Gen 3 SoC 为日常使用提供了足够的动力。电池续航时间长，支持快速充电。
不过，Realme 14 Pro+ 也有一些不足之处。它的制造质量并不完美，有吱吱作响的声音和略微明显的材质过渡，扬声器听起来也有些发闷。
尽管如此，Realme 14 Pro+ 5G 仍然是一款高品质的智能手机，具有不错的功能设置，甚至可以在某些方面与更昂贵的手机相媲美。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
Realme 14 Pro+ 5G 可在许多在线零售商处购买，其中一些甚至提供折扣。
在德国亚马逊（Amazon.de）上，128 GB 存储空间的版本售价略低于 400 欧元，而 512 GB 大容量存储空间的版本则要贵 50 欧元。
Realme 14 Pro+ 也可以在美国亚马逊上买到，8 GB + 256 GB 版本的价格从 645 美元起。
规格
机箱和功能：做工有待改进
Realme 14 Pro+ 5G 外观漂亮。它的圆形相机模块给人留下了深刻印象，相机镜头像四叶草一样对称分布，两侧有三个 LED 闪光灯。
背面的其他部分也采用了高标准的设计。这款智能手机既可以选择触感舒适的灰色略带橡胶质感的塑料，也可以选择带有金色装饰的大理石纹白色表面。
不过，扭动时会听到轻微的吱吱声和破裂声，这在一定程度上降低了品质感。此外，材料的过渡也稍显明显，因此总体印象良好，但并不完美。
得益于 IP68/IP69 认证，手机防水防尘不成问题。
Realme 14 Pro+ 有两种内存版本可供选择，我们测试的是配备 512 GB 存储空间和 12 GB 内存的高配版本。如果你想省点钱，Realme 14 Pro+ 还提供 256 GB 存储空间和 8 GB 内存的版本。
遗憾的是，USB 端口仅根据 USB 2.0 标准进行内部连接，因此无法将图像输出到外部显示器。
通信和操作：快速无线局域网和宽移动频率
Realme 14 Pro+ 5G 通过 Wi-Fi 6 标准与 Wi-Fi 网络通信，速度相当不错，这意味着它可以很好地利用千兆网络线路。
支持多种频率，可连接全球 5G 或 LTE 移动网络。
触摸屏边角灵敏度高，可精确快速地进行操作。120 Hz 的最大刷新率也是原因之一。
指纹传感器位于屏幕后下方，即使是小手也能轻松触及。指纹一旦注册，读取器就能快速准确地识别出来。面部识别也可以实现，但只能使用前置摄像头进行 2D 面部匹配。
软件和可持续性：Android 15，根据地区不同，更新周期较长
开箱后，14 Pro+ 5G 安装了基于Android 15 的 Realme UI 6。Realme 承诺更新至 2031 年，并提供多达 6 个新的Android 版本。不过，这只适用于西方市场。在印度，只承诺再提供两个Android 版本和三年的安全更新。
在可持续发展方面，这款手机的包装不使用塑料。遗憾的是，Realme 只提供了一份略显陈旧的可持续发展报告，但已经采取了回收和减少二氧化碳排放的措施。遗憾的是，目前还没有 Realme 14 Pro+ 5G 的具体排放数据。
摄像头：Periscope 变焦摄像头是独特的卖点
在摄像头设置方面，Realme 12 Pro+ 与它相比变化不大 Realme 12 Pro+相比，Realme 12 Pro+ 的摄像头配置并没有太大变化，但潜望镜变焦摄像头在这个价位的手机中仍属罕见。Realme 14 Pro+ 配备了一枚 5000 万像素的主摄像头，在光线充足的环境下拍摄的照片细节和清晰度都相当不错。
在弱光环境下，该摄像头仍能拍摄出清晰度较高的好照片。不过，暗处的动态范围可以更大一些。
得益于潜望式变焦镜头，即使是放大 6 倍的图像也能保持清晰和丰富的细节。利用数码变焦，甚至可以拍摄高达 120 倍的照片。
800 万像素广角摄像头完善了三摄像头。不过，它只能在图像中显示相当粗糙的细节。
3200 万像素前置摄像头可拍摄动态清晰的自拍照，虚化效果也可接受。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Hauptkamera PflanzeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera Low LightWeitwinkelkamera
显示屏明亮的 120 赫兹 OLED
如今，明亮的 OLED 显示屏已不再是中端产品的一厢情愿。
Realme 14 Pro+ 也拥有这样的显示屏，在我们的测试中，屏幕完全使用时亮度可达 1,169 cd/m²。在较低的 APL 下，亮度甚至可以达到 1,435 cd/m²。因此，该屏幕非常适合显示 HDR 内容。
屏幕的色彩还原性很好；肉眼看不到偏色，与参考色彩空间的偏差也很小。
另一方面，在低亮度下会出现 290 Hz PWM 闪烁，这可能会给敏感人群带来困扰。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 1169 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.17 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86
ΔE Greyscale 1.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
96.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.249
| Realme 14 Pro+ OLED, 2800x1272, 6.8" | Realme 12 Pro+ AMOLED, 2412x1080, 6.7" | Honor Magic7 Lite AMOLED, 2700x1224, 6.8" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7" | Motorola Edge 50 Neo P-OLED, 2670x1220, 6.4" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -24% | 9% | 5% | -19% | |
| Brightness middle | 1169 | 778 -33% | 1228 5% | 1210 4% | 1246 7% |
| Brightness | 1148 | 783 -32% | 1235 8% | 1222 6% | 1235 8% |
| Brightness Distribution | 94 | 95 1% | 95 1% | 92 -2% | 98 4% |
| Black Level * | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.17 | 1.63 -39% | 1.1 6% | 1 15% | 1.8 -54% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.38 | 3.57 -50% | 2.2 8% | 2.7 -13% | 3.81 -60% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.9 | 1.7 11% | 1.4 26% | 1.5 21% | 2.3 -21% |
| Gamma | 2.249 98% | 2.221 99% | 2.25 98% | 2.25 98% | 2.191 100% |
| CCT | 6732 97% | 6576 99% | 6605 98% | 6509 100% | 6488 100% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 290 Hz Amplitude: 45 % |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 290 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 290 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8471 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 3.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.9 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.4 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池寿命：骁龙 7s Gen 3 可轻松处理日常任务，运行时间长
采用 高通骁龙 7s 第三代处理器，Realme 14 Pro Plus 5G 使用的 SoC 在这个价位的手机中可以提供很高的性能。因此，在日常系统操作中很少出现卡顿或等待时间，一切运行都非常流畅。
图形处理器的性能也达到了不错的水平。虽然在玩高端游戏时不应该完全依赖它来获得流畅的帧数，但其性能对于休闲游戏玩家来说肯定是足够了。
UFS 3.1 闪存作为大容量存储器可实现快速数据传输并缩短加载时间。
长时间使用后，外壳会明显发热，但发热量并不严重。即使在多次运行 3DMark 压力测试后，这款智能手机仍能很好地保持性能，我们测得的最大性能损失为 9.2%。
底部的扬声器得到听筒的支持，因此在横向模式下可以产生一定的立体声效果。这对扬声器可以产生相当大的音量，但声音似乎有点闷。这一点很有趣，因为即使是中低音也能听到，并能感觉到振动。
由于有多种蓝牙音频编解码器可供选择，因此您还可以可靠地连接外置扬声器或无线耳机，并获得良好的音质。
电池容量高达 6,000 mAh，但这并没有大幅增加手机的重量。
在我们的无线局域网测试中，手机的运行时间也非常出色，超过了 19 小时。使用 Realme 14 Pro+ 可以轻松地度过一天，甚至可以在节省使用时间的情况下坚持两天。
这款手机的充电速度最高可达 80 瓦，但包装盒中并没有随附充电器。在测试实验室中，这款智能手机与我们的充电器配合得很好。使用合适的充电器，充满电只需要一个多小时。
| Geekbench AI | |
| Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.3 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (231 - 1106, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Realme 14 Pro+ | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (n=1) | |
| Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.3 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (231 - 4555, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (231 - 232, n=2) | |
| Realme 14 Pro+ | |
| Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.3 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (536 - 4549, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| Realme 14 Pro+ | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (536 - 548, n=2) | |
| Realme 14 Pro+ | Realme 12 Pro+ | Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G | Motorola Edge 50 Neo | Average 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -3% | -51% | -28% | -19% | -12% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 2002 | 1926.1 -4% | 992.72 -50% | 1023 -49% | 1852 ? -7% | 2042 ? 2% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 1760 | 1756.1 0% | 931.68 -47% | 964.6 -45% | 1227 ? -30% | 1657 ? -6% |
| Random Read 4KB | 366 | 335.2 -8% | 171.2 -53% | 331 -10% | 286 ? -22% | 283 ? -23% |
| Random Write 4KB | 411 | 420.2 2% | 186.14 -55% | 384.1 -7% | 348 ? -15% | 327 ? -20% |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.9 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.6 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Honor Magic7 Lite | |
| Motorola Edge 50 Neo | |
| Realme 12 Pro+ | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G | |
| Realme 14 Pro+ | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Motorola Edge 50 Neo | |
| Realme 14 Pro+ | |
| Honor Magic7 Lite | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G | |
| Realme 12 Pro+ | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Realme 12 Pro+ | |
| Realme 12 Pro+ | |
| Honor Magic7 Lite | |
| Motorola Edge 50 Neo | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G | |
| Realme 14 Pro+ | |
Realme 14 Pro+ audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Realme 14 Pro+ 6000 mAh | Realme 12 Pro+ 5000 mAh | Honor Magic7 Lite 6600 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G 5110 mAh | Motorola Edge 50 Neo 4310 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -20% | 20% | 1% | -29% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 1154 | 919 -20% | 1384 20% | 1168 1% | 824 -29% |
| Reader / Idle | 1433 | ||||
| H.264 | 1109 | ||||
| Load | 249 |
Notebookcheck 的总体评分
Realme 14 Pro+ 5G 的设计非常出色，续航时间长，提供的功能在这个价位的手机中几乎是无与伦比的。
不过，制造商还有进一步提高制造质量的空间。
Realme 14 Pro+
- 04/23/2025 v8
Florian Schmitt
Total Sustainability Score: Potential competitors in comparison
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 77.8%  | Realme 14 Pro+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $14.99 Screen Protector for Realme ... 2. $7.99 Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible ... 3. $10.80 Rfvzubemok Compatible with R... List Price: 499€ | 194 g | 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.83" 2800x1272 450 PPI OLED |
2. 77.1%  | Realme 12 Pro+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: $569.00 List Price: 500€ | 196 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.70" 2412x1080 394 PPI AMOLED |
3. 77.4%  | Honor Magic7 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $11.82 KJYFOANI for Honor Magic7 Li... 2. $10.52 KJYFOANI for Honor Magic7 Li... 3. $16.52 KJYFOANI for Honor Magic7 Li... List Price: 400€ | 189 g | 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.78" 2700x1224 437 PPI AMOLED |
4. 79.6%  | Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $6.99 Natbok 2+2 Pack 3D Screen Pr... 2. $7.99 Natbok 2+2 Pack 3D Screen Pr... 3. $10.79 Ibywind Screen Protector For... List Price: 530€ | 205 g | 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" 2712x1220 446 PPI AMOLED |
5. 77.3%  | Motorola Edge 50 Neo MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $3.47 Mr.Shield Screen Protector c... 2. $8.99 Iiseon High Sensitivity Hydr... 3. $8.99 NECARSIN 3 Pack for Motorola... List Price: 499€ | 171 g | 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.40" 2670x1220 459 PPI P-OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
