Realme Book (Slim) Laptop Review:性能良好的Tiger Lake Core i3产品，配备3:2 2K显示屏
曾经专注于智能手机的Realme，现在已经涉足包括笔记本电脑在内的多个细分市场。Realme 最近在印度推出了Slim系列笔记本电脑，有Core i3和Core i5两种选择。
我们有Realme Book (Slim)，它采用了 酷睿i3-1115G4.我们的样品还采用了8GB内存，256GB固态硬盘，目前售价为44,999英镑（600美元）。Core i5-1135G7 选项也是可用的，它配有8GB内存和512GB存储。这将使你花费56,999美元（762美元）。
在这篇评论中，我们好好看看Realme Book (Slim) Core i3，看看该公司在笔记本电脑利基市场的小步骤是否正朝着正确的方向发展。
Potential competitors in comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 81.3 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2021 | Realme Book (Slim) i3-1115G4, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs | 1.4 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 2160x1440 | |
| 78.2 % v7 (old) | Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 i3-1115G4, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs | 1.6 kg | 17.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | ||
| 83.6 % v7 (old) | Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 i3-1115G4, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs | 1.5 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | ||
| 86.4 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2021 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.4 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 85 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2020 | Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B R3 4300U, Vega 5 | 1.2 kg | 16.55 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 86.3 % v7 (old) | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE R5 5500U, Vega 7 | 1.4 kg | 19.1 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | ||
| 81 % v7 (old) | Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC i3-10110U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.9 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | ||
| 89.6 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2020 | Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3 i3-1000NG4, Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) | 1.3 kg | 16.1 mm | 13.30" | 2560x1600 |
案例。一个伟大的第一印象
Realme的Book(Slim)在底盘结构上基本正确。圆滑的一体式设计和最小的干扰会吸引很多人。除了机盖和底边框，该设备上没有太多的品牌标识。
1.38公斤的铝制机身完全不觉得是个负担。设计语言明确无误地让人想起了 MacBook Air从包装到机箱，这本身不是一件坏事。没有尖锐的角落，整个设计感觉很有凝聚力，这对Realme的第一次尝试来说是很好的。
一个小问题是，盖子不能只用一个手指打开。
连接性。需要加密狗
Realme Book (Slim)提供了非常简陋的端口选择，左边只有两个USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-C端口，右边是一个USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-A端口和一个3.5毫米组合音频插孔。选择酷睿i5型号的用户可以在其中一个Type-C端口获得Thunderbolt 4功能。
两个Type-C端口之间有足够的间距，所以插入的连接器不会阻塞相邻的端口。
遗憾的是，没有微型SD卡读卡器或Kensington锁插槽可用。
沟通
Realme为酷睿i3版本提供带有蓝牙5.1的英特尔Wireless-AC 9560无线网卡，而酷睿i5版本则提供Wi-Fi 6和蓝牙5.2。
我们用我们的参考Netgear Nighthawk AX12 RAX120路由器测试了Wi-Fi性能，距离笔记本电脑1米，处于直接视线范围。下载和上传速度都很好，Realme Book可以与其他采用较新的Wi-Fi 6 AX200和AX201卡的设备很好地竞争。
如果愿意，可以将WLAN卡升级为性能更强的选项。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
| Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3 | |
网络摄像头
网络摄像头是绝大多数笔记本电脑中常见的90万像素品种。有可察觉的纹理，但考虑到价格，色彩再现和清晰度都很好。
只要有足够的环境光线，网络摄像头就可以满足一般视频通话的需要。
安全问题
Realme Book的电源键中内置了一个指纹传感器，与Windows Hello兼容。
我们在设置或使用指纹传感器时没有遇到任何问题，而且它的反应也相当灵敏。
这款笔记本电脑有一个独立的TPM 2.0，并为Windows 11做好准备。
辅料
除了通常的文件和一个65瓦的充电器外，盒子里没有其他附件。
维护
没有专门的维护舱口。底部面板可以通过卸下九颗Torx T5螺钉来撬开，露出内部结构。
虽然LPDDR4X内存是焊接的，但如果需要的话，Wi-Fi卡和NVMe固态硬盘可以被换掉。
担保
Realme为Realme Book（超薄）提供了一年的标准保修。印度的延长保修服务是由第三方供应商Servify提供的。客户可以在结账时购买延长保修计划。或在购买后270天内通过邮寄购买发票副本到[email protected]，手动选择加入。
输入设备。类似MacBook Air，做得恰到好处
键盘
Realme Book（超薄）提供了令人惊讶的良好打字体验。键的间距很好，1.3毫米的键程感觉恰到好处。键有三段式背光控制--昏暗、明亮和关闭--而且字体清晰可读。
一个小问题是，在左右方向键上没有标记原点和终点键，尽管功能非常存在。没有专门的按键用于任何形式的一键式性能提升。
触摸板
Realme Book (Slim)的触摸板尺寸为12.5厘米×7.5厘米，提供了足够的空间，可以在几乎可以忽略不计的摩擦中滑行。WindowsPrecision 手势很容易激活，而且反应灵敏。整个触摸板就像一个鼠标按钮。点击触摸板是相对不费力的，而且点击的声音也不大。
总的来说，Realme似乎从MacBook Air的输入设备中获得了巨大的灵感，几乎没有抱怨的空间。
显示。明亮的2K面板，具有良好的色彩和高PWM
我们的测试设备配备了14英寸2160x1440面板，长宽比为3:2，屏占比为90%。Realme为Book（超薄）配备了一个非常有能力的显示屏，应该适合观看大多数内容类型。通过长时间的曝光，我们看到背光出血在右边的角落比较明显。
尽管看起来是预算价格，Realme Book（超薄）的显示屏提供了非常好的特性。此前，我们已经看到这块奇美P140ZKA-BZ1面板在华为MateBook 14 和Chuwi CoreBook X 中也有良好表现。我 们测量了403.52尼特的最大亮度和91%的出色分布。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 403.52 cd/m²
Contrast: 1495:1 (Black: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.23 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.62
ΔE Greyscale 6.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
68.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.08
| Realme Book (Slim) Chi Mei P140ZKA-BZ1, IPS, 14", 2160x1440 | Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 BOE NV15N3D, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE AU Optronics B140HAN06.8, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B AU Optronics B140HAN04.0, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE AU Optronics B140HAN04.E, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC Dell 156CL05, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3 APPA042, IPS, 13.3", 2560x1600 | Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 AU Optronics B140HAN04.E, a-Si IPS LED, 14", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -40% | 0% | -43% | -43% | -38% | 4% | -44% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.6 | 39.42 -41% | 66.3 0% | 37.78 -43% | 37.47 -44% | 40.78 -39% | 70.3 6% | 37.2 -44% |
| sRGB Coverage | 97.8 | 58.7 -40% | 97.4 0% | 56.8 -42% | 56 -43% | 61.3 -37% | 98 0% | 55.5 -43% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 68.2 | 40.73 -40% | 68.1 0% | 39.03 -43% | 38.71 -43% | 42.15 -38% | 71.6 5% | 38.4 -44% |
| Response Times | -71% | -72% | -31% | -36% | -50% | 17% | -40% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 33.26 ? | 45.6 ? -37% | 52 ? -56% | 42 ? -26% | 41 ? -23% | 38 ? -14% | 38.4 ? -15% | 45.9 ? -38% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 20.62 ? | 36.4 ? -77% | 33 ? -60% | 28 ? -36% | 28 ? -36% | 28 ? -36% | 28.4 ? -38% | 29 ? -41% |
| PWM Frequency | 58500 ? | 1020 ? -98% | 143 ? -100% | 29800 -49% | 250 -100% | 119000 ? 103% | ||
| Screen | -99% | 2% | -87% | -7% | -83% | 25% | -77% | |
| Brightness middle | 403.52 | 233.1 -42% | 344 -15% | 256 -37% | 357 -12% | 262 -35% | 416 3% | 386 -4% |
| Brightness | 390 | 226 -42% | 340 -13% | 237 -39% | 315 -19% | 236 -39% | 403 3% | 348 -11% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 90 -1% | 88 -3% | 81 -11% | 82 -10% | 86 -5% | 95 4% | 83 -9% |
| Black Level * | 0.27 | 0.21 22% | 0.13 52% | 0.17 37% | 0.455 -69% | 0.31 -15% | 0.34 -26% | 0.29 -7% |
| Contrast | 1495 | 1110 -26% | 2646 77% | 1506 1% | 785 -47% | 845 -43% | 1224 -18% | 1331 -11% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.23 | 5.69 -9% | 3.29 37% | 5.43 -4% | 3.98 24% | 4.92 6% | 0.9 83% | 6.3 -20% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.69 | 20.62 -113% | 7.48 23% | 19.73 -104% | 6.92 29% | 15.83 -63% | 1.4 86% | 18.3 -89% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.62 | 5.12 -726% | 1.79 -189% | 4.8 -674% | 4.34 -600% | 0.6 3% | 4.1 -561% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.5 | 3.3 49% | 3.25 50% | 3.29 49% | 3.33 49% | 3.47 47% | 1 85% | 5.4 17% |
| Gamma | 2.08 106% | 2.35 94% | 2.29 96% | 2.52 87% | 2.47 89% | 2.4 92% | 2.2 100% | 2.55 86% |
| CCT | 7727 84% | 6749 96% | 6358 102% | 6840 95% | 6138 106% | 6680 97% | 6629 98% | 5894 110% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 37.1 | 36 | 36 | 39 | 63.9 | |||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 58 | 57 | 56 | 61 | 97.6 | |||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -70% /
-81% | -23% /
-13% | -54% /
-69% | -29% /
-21% | -57% /
-67% | 15% /
19% | -54% /
-65% |
* ... smaller is better
Realme Book覆盖了97.8%的sRGB色域，同时也显示了体面的AdobeRGB和DCI-P3覆盖率。总的来说，这个面板似乎是预算笔记本电脑的一个很好的选择，具有体面的亮度水平和色彩，这应该允许查看所有内容类型，同时也适合休闲的多媒体编辑工作流程。
开箱后，颜色不是很准确，ColorChecker的平均Delta E为5.23。然而，奇美P140ZKA-BZ1面板允许足够的校准范围。我们可以实现0.62的平均Delta E和2.55的最大Delta E，如果你喜欢色彩精确的工作流程，这是个好兆头。
我们校准的ICC文件可以从上面的链接下载。
Realme Book (Slim)并不意味着是一个游戏设备，所以记录的黑色到白色的反应时间为20.62毫秒，50%灰色到80%灰色的反应时间为33.26毫秒并不令人惊讶。
该面板在10%的亮度下有一个非常高的PWM，即58,500赫兹，这在大多数亮度水平上基本保持不变。虽然面板使用PWM进行亮度调节，但频率相当高，所以敏感的用户在长时间使用时应该不会有任何不适感。
关于PWM的更多信息，请查看我们的文章，"为什么脉冲宽度调制（PWM）是如此令人头痛".另外，我们的 PWM排名表提供了所有审查过的设备的PWM和响应时间的测量概况。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20.62 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.52 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 9.1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 33.26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.92 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18.34 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 58500 Hz | ≤ 10 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 58500 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 58500 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
明亮的显示屏确保了体面的、清晰的户外观看体验。该显示屏提供170°宽的视角。从不同角度观看时，我们没有注意到任何颜色或亮度损失。
性能。在单核方面击败了AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
我们的Realme Book（超薄）采用了 英特尔Tiger Lake 酷睿i3-1115G4这是一个2C/4T的部件，基本时钟为3GHz，提升到4.1GHz。购买者还可以选择 酷睿i5-1135G7选项。两种型号都没有提供独立的GPU。
处理器
我们单位的Core i3-1115G4在Cinebench R15持续循环测试中提供了良好的持续性能。虽然我们看到每运行五次左右，分数就会出现持续下滑，但该处理器能够迅速恢复原来的性能。我们还发现，Realme Book（超薄）在这项测试中的速度比 戴尔Inspiron 15 5502采用相同的处理器。
酷睿i3-1115G4也与联想Yoga Slim 7的酷睿i5-1135G7持平。 联想Yoga Slim 7在大多数单核测试中与酷睿i5-1135G7相当，甚至比 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U-采用 联想IdeaPad 5.
该CPU提供了28W的持续PL1和64W的短脉冲PL2，在电池上，PL2降至约45.25W。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
| Average Intel Core i3-1115G4 (961 - 1251, n=6) | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 | |
| Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 790, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
| Average Intel Core i3-1115G4 (504 - 515, n=6) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
| Average Intel Core i3-1115G4 (2725 - 3244, n=6) | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2001, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
| Average Intel Core i3-1115G4 (1242 - 1319, n=5) | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
| Average Intel Core i3-1115G4 (385 - 507, n=6) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3 | |
| Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 307, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Average Intel Core i3-1115G4 (137 - 197, n=6) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3 | |
| Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 | |
| Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
| Average Intel Core i3-1115G4 (940 - 1188, n=6) | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2669 - 6403, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| Average Intel Core i3-1115G4 (4497 - 4674, n=6) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11775 - 77867, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| Average Intel Core i3-1115G4 (11122 - 13422, n=6) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 | |
| Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (621 - 2350, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 | |
| Average Intel Core i3-1115G4 (1190 - 1352, n=8) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 14728, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| Average Intel Core i3-1115G4 (2341 - 2983, n=8) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 | |
| Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3 | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| Average Intel Core i3-1115G4 (3.25 - 4.1, n=6) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 | |
| Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3 | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Average Intel Core i3-1115G4 (40.6 - 62.8, n=7) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
| Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3 | |
| Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
| Average Intel Core i3-1115G4 (0.636 - 0.671, n=7) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.413 - 1.456, n=57, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
在电池上快速运行的Cinebench R20中，我们没有发现多核分数有什么变化。然而，降低PL2和时钟导致单核分数下降20%。
移动中的实际性能可能会受到一些冲击，但总体上应该与主电源的性能相当，这取决于工作负载。
请看我们专门的 酷睿i3-1115G4网页，了解更多信息和基准测试。
系统性能
Realme Book (Slim)应该可以满足基本的生产力需求，包括办公、网络浏览和媒体消费，不会有太多麻烦。PCMark 10的整体得分仅比搭载Core i5-1135G7的联想Yoga Slim 7慢了约5%。
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
| Average Intel Core i3-1115G4, Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (3898 - 4390, n=6) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 | |
| Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (9476 - 11331, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
| Average Intel Core i3-1115G4, Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (8205 - 9090, n=6) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 | |
| Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6440 - 10623, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
| Average Intel Core i3-1115G4, Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (6166 - 6488, n=6) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 | |
| Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 10983, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| Average Intel Core i3-1115G4, Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (3161 - 3895, n=6) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 | |
| Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4620 points | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 2856 points | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4390 points | |
Help | ||
DPC延时
我们使用LatencyMon测量DPC延迟。我们的测试包括打开我们网站的多个标签，在YouTube上播放我们的4K视频样本，并运行Prime95原地大FFT压力约10秒。
直到我们运行YouTube视频测试时，我们测量到最高的中断到处理延迟是588.90微秒。在运行Prime95之后，这一数值增加到670.4微秒。造成这种延迟增加的主要原因似乎是Windows驱动模式框架Wdf01000.sys。Wdf01000.sys本身不会造成高延迟，但实际上受到其他错误驱动程序的影响，例如本例中的ACPI.sys。
尽管如此，Realme Book的DPC延迟仍比竞争对手低，应该很容易满足目标使用情况。
请看我们的 DPC延时排名页面，了解更多延迟比较。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的设备配备了三星PM991a 256GB PCIe Gen3 NVMe固态硬盘，占用了主板上唯一可用的M.2 2280插槽。因此，任何存储扩展都意味着要完全替换原有的驱动器。
三星PM991a实际上的额定连续读取速度为3100MB/s，连续写入速度为1300MB/s。然而，我们测量到的连续读取和写入速度明显较低，表明CPU或电路板存在一些瓶颈。有趣的是，我们在联想ThinkBook 14 G2中也观察到类似的结果，它使用的是类似的固态硬盘。
增加队列深度确实如预期的那样导致了读写速度的提高，但这在常规使用中一般不会发现有什么适用性。
也就是说，4K的读写速度与竞争对手相当，所以随机磁盘访问应该不会受到太大的影响，整体体验仍然感觉相当灵敏。
在队列深度为8的连续DiskSpd读取循环中，我们也没有观察到固态硬盘有任何节流现象。
请看我们的 SSD和HDD基准测试页面，了解更多的存储性能比较。
| Realme Book (Slim) Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD | Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNS128G | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B SK hynix BC511 HFM256GDJTNI-82A0 | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe | Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3 Apple SSD AP0256 | Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 Samsung PM991A MZALQ256HBJD | Average Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -94% | 52% | -26% | 58% | -84% | -54% | -2% | -3% | |
| Seq Read | 2349 | 1142 -51% | 2955 26% | 1682 -28% | 2645 13% | 1971 -16% | 1135 -52% | 2011 -14% | 2228 ? -5% |
| Seq Write | 826 | 199.8 -76% | 2474 200% | 931 13% | 2627 218% | 1130 37% | 1090 32% | 772 -7% | 912 ? 10% |
| 4K Read | 54.7 | 39.5 -28% | 52.7 -4% | 41.53 -24% | 55.2 1% | 51.3 -6% | 14.87 -73% | 55.1 1% | 47.5 ? -13% |
| 4K Write | 162.1 | 165.7 2% | 199.2 23% | 109.1 -33% | 119.4 -26% | 119.7 -26% | 26.27 -84% | 172 6% | 144.6 ? -11% |
| 4K-64 Read | 788 | 461.2 -41% | 1428 81% | 603 -23% | 1308 66% | 585 -26% | 585 -26% | 658 -16% | 746 ? -5% |
| 4K-64 Write | 832 | 203 -76% | 1698 104% | 713 -14% | 1816 118% | 495.5 -40% | 154.6 -81% | 728 -12% | 813 ? -2% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.125 | 0.124 1% | 0.105 16% | 0.057 54% | 0.107 14% | 0.126 -1% | 0.071 43% | 0.1373 ? -10% | |
| Access Time Write * | 0.023 | 0.181 -687% | 0.02 13% | 0.035 -52% | 0.031 -35% | 0.22 -857% | 0.058 -152% | 0.021 9% | 0.028 ? -22% |
| Score Read | 1078 | 615 -43% | 1776 65% | 813 -25% | 1628 51% | 833 -23% | 713 -34% | 914 -15% | 1017 ? -6% |
| Score Write | 1077 | 389 -64% | 2145 99% | 915 -15% | 2198 104% | 728 -32% | 290 -73% | 977 -9% | 1049 ? -3% |
| Score Total | 2645 | 1284 -51% | 4811 82% | 2118 -20% | 4667 76% | 1962 -26% | 1365 -48% | 2314 -13% | 2532 ? -4% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1034 | 216.8 -79% | 1513 46% | 692 -33% | 1476 43% | 273.5 -74% | 1097 ? 6% | ||
| Copy Program MB/s | 349.4 | 163 -53% | 257.3 -26% | 226.5 -35% | 538 54% | 184.6 -47% | 408 ? 17% | ||
| Copy Game MB/s | 698 | 176 -75% | 712 2% | 391.5 -44% | 1185 70% | 281 -60% | 780 ? 12% | ||
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -42% | 47% | -24% | 31% | -9% | -37% | -7% | ||
| Write 4K | 147.1 | 138.5 -6% | 239.7 63% | 96.3 -35% | 93.3 -37% | 150 2% | 34.57 -76% | 136.4 ? -7% | |
| Read 4K | 56 | 41.98 -25% | 57.3 2% | 35.06 -37% | 38.87 -31% | 61.8 10% | 28.48 -49% | 49.9 ? -11% | |
| Write Seq | 1175 | 213.5 -82% | 2379 102% | 1001 -15% | 2834 141% | 458 -61% | 1026 -13% | 1193 ? 2% | |
| Read Seq | 1810 | 1289 -29% | 2499 38% | 1072 -41% | 2452 35% | 1881 4% | 1109 -39% | 1746 ? -4% | |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 447.3 | 157.8 -65% | 484.9 8% | 423.9 -5% | 386.6 -14% | 338.4 -24% | 178.4 -60% | 419 ? -6% | |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 493.9 | 448.9 -9% | 671 36% | 464.7 -6% | 495.5 0% | 447.3 -9% | 557 13% | 473 ? -4% | |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1234 | 210.5 -83% | 2711 120% | 967 -22% | 2981 142% | 1563 27% | 970 -21% | 1182 ? -4% | |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3102 | 1853 -40% | 3370 9% | 2179 -30% | 3566 15% | 2422 -22% | 1513 -51% | 2695 ? -13% | |
| Write 4K Q8T8 | 496.1 | 423 ? -15% | |||||||
| Read 4K Q8T8 | 902 | 854 ? -5% | |||||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -68% /
-75% | 50% /
50% | -25% /
-25% | 45% /
48% | -47% /
-57% | -46% /
-47% | -2% /
-2% | -5% /
-4% |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能
UHD Graphics Xe G4 iGPU有48个EUs，无论如何都不是一个游戏卡。这款GPU在3DMark中的性能比RX Vega 5快5%到28%不等。 RX Vega 5中的 AMD Ryzen 3 4300U.它也可以比戴尔Inspiron 15 5502中的相同实现快32%。
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (968 - 16296, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (2156 - 3906, n=11) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3 | |
| Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (724 - 12364, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (1184 - 4412, n=11) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3 | |
| Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4205 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 72735 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 12074 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2842 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 1401 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1018 points | |
Help | ||
UHD Graphics Xe G4也可与Iris Xe Graphics G7（80 EUs） ，除了在3DMarkTime Spy Graphics和3DMark 11 Performance Graphics测试中，它分别落后25%和18%。
3DMarkTime Spy 结果在切换到电池供电时保持相对不变。
游戏性能
UHD Graphics Xe G4只适合在低分辨率和低设置下播放旧的游戏。也就是说，我们确实发现它比戴尔Inspiron 5502的相同GPU要快。在低到中等设置下，Realme Book也与RX Vega 7持平或略快于它。 RX Vega 7中的RX Vega 7。 Ryzen 5 5500U.
虽然很难玩，但我们在TheWitcher 3 1080p Ultra压力测试中没有发现很多节流现象。
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | |
| 1280x720 Lite Quality | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (29.9 - 111.6, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (14.6 - 29.3, n=12) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
| 1920x1080 Standard Quality | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (16.3 - 59.9, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (8.88 - 19, n=7) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 | |
| 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11.9 - 44.2, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (3.86 - 19, n=5) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 | |
| BioShock Infinite | |
| 1280x720 Very Low Preset | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs () | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3 | |
| 1366x768 Medium Preset | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs () | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3 | |
| 1366x768 High Preset | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs () | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
| Realme Book (Slim) | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs () | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3 | |
| Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC | |
The Witcher 3 FPS Chart
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 141.4 | 87 | 73.3 | 22.32 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 62.3 | 39.3 | 20.7 | 10.3 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 95.5 | 50.8 | 40.8 | 36 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 29.3 | 19 | 19 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 42.5 | 29.6 | 26.7 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 63.6 | 26.7 | 20.9 | 0 |
Emissions: Tolerable heat and noise levels
系统噪音
Realme Book在大多数情况下提供了安静的计算体验。除非在负载下，否则风扇不会启动。我们观察到，在Prime95+FurMark的最大负荷下，风扇的最大噪音为44.58分贝（A），而在1080p Ultra下使用TheWitcher 3
的压力时，风扇的噪音约为43.15分贝（A）。我们没有观察到任何杂乱的噪音，如线圈啸叫或压力下的随机点击。
| Realme Book (Slim) UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, i3-1115G4, Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD | Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, i3-1115G4, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNS128G | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B Vega 5, R3 4300U, SK hynix BC511 HFM256GDJTNI-82A0 | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE Vega 7, R5 5500U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC UHD Graphics 620, i3-10110U, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe | Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3 Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), i3-1000NG4, Apple SSD AP0256 | Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, i3-1115G4, Samsung PM991A MZALQ256HBJD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 12% | 17% | 4% | 9% | 13% | 5% | 11% | |
| off / environment * | 28.8 | 27.5 5% | 26 10% | 30.3 -5% | 25.5 11% | 25 13% | 29 -1% | 24.6 15% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.8 | 27.9 3% | 26 10% | 30.3 -5% | 25.5 11% | 25 13% | 29 -1% | 24.6 15% |
| Idle Average * | 28.8 | 27.9 3% | 26 10% | 30.3 -5% | 25.5 11% | 25 13% | 29 -1% | 24.6 15% |
| Idle Maximum * | 28.8 | 27.9 3% | 26 10% | 30.3 -5% | 25.5 11% | 27.8 3% | 29 -1% | 26.7 7% |
| Load Average * | 41.66 | 28.1 33% | 30.2 28% | 32.6 22% | 40.6 3% | 35.1 16% | 31.6 24% | 38.9 7% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 43.15 | |||||||
| Load Maximum * | 44.58 | 34.8 22% | 29 35% | 35.6 20% | 40.8 8% | 34.8 22% | 39.4 12% | 42.8 4% |
* ... smaller is better
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 28.8 / 28.8 / 28.8 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 41.66 / 44.58 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 28.8 dB(A) | ||
温度
尽管Realme Book采用的是入门级的Core i3-1115G4 ULV处理器，但它仍然配备了双风扇双热管冷却系统。这确保了绝大多数预定任务的可容忍的表面温度。
风扇的排气口被显示器铰链挡住了，这确实导致了该区域的热量积聚，正如你在下面的热图像中看到的那样。然而，这不需要太过担心，因为冷却系统在实际使用中不太可能受到太多压力。
即使在重压下，底部面板的中间区域也不会太热。我们在膝上使用Realme Book进行基本的生产力任务时，没有遇到任何不适。
在压力下，最高温度出现在设备的左上和左下部分。键盘周围的温度在大多数情况下是可以忍受的，而触摸板和掌托区域仍然相对凉爽。然而，电源在压力下确实达到了近50℃。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.6 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.6 °C / 87.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-2.3 °C / -4.2 F).
压力测试
在Prime95压力测试中，我们看到CPU时钟在最初但非常短暂地上升到4.1GHz之后，基本上稳定在3GHz左右。平均封装温度通常在69℃左右，但我们确实观察到有限度地提升到3.5GHz，持续了大约5分钟，期间封装温度几乎达到82℃。
加入FurMark后，仅CPU就减少了可用的散热空间，导致时钟基本稳定在1.6GHz左右，偶尔会飙升到1.8GHz。GPU的时钟在大多数情况下保持稳定在1150MHz，而封装温度在64℃和66℃之间波动。
在1080p Ultra下对 Witcher 3，CPU和GPU的时钟基本上分别保持在1.5GHz和1250MHz的稳定状态。
虽然我们看到时钟偶尔会有波动，但Realme Book（超薄）在额定PL1/PL2限制的压力下表现出相当稳定的性能，没有任何明显的节流迹象。
| 压力测试 | CPU时钟（GHz） | GPU时钟（MHz） | 平均封装温度（°C |
| 系统空闲 | 1.2 | 101 | 35 |
| Prime95 | 2.99 | 100 | 69 |
| Prime95 + FurMark | 1.69 | 1150 | 66 |
| Witcher 3 | 1.51 | 1250 | 64 |
发言人
Realme Book配备了一对底部发射的扬声器。在大约78.73分贝（A）的情况下，它们的音量足以填满一个中等大小的房间，而且失真最小。从我们的粉红噪声图中可以看出，低音几乎不存在，但中音和高音似乎相当平衡。板载的麦克风对能够实现体面的视频会议体验。
Realme提供了DTS音频处理应用程序，用于定制基本音频特性。如果需要更好的音频质量，可以使用3.5毫米组合音频插孔。
Realme Book (Slim) audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Energy Management: Higher power consumption than the competition
消耗功率
就竞争对手而言，Realme Book (Slim)在功耗方面并不是最经济的，但数字是在预期范围内。戴尔Inspiron 15 5502在这方面表现较好，但我们也看到这款笔记本电脑在许多基准测试中都被Realme Book超越了。
与搭载Ryzen 5 5500U的联想IdeaPad 5相比，Realme Book的整体经济性提高了约8%。
箱内的65W电源适配器即使在紧张的条件下也能为设备提供足够的电力。
| Off / Standby | 0.5 / 0.67 Watt |
| Idle | 5.42 / 10.38 / 11.17 Watt |
| Load |
38.58 / 47.58 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Realme Book (Slim) i3-1115G4, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD, IPS, 2160x1440, 14" | Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 i3-1115G4, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNS128G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B R3 4300U, Vega 5, SK hynix BC511 HFM256GDJTNI-82A0, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE R5 5500U, Vega 7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC i3-10110U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3 i3-1000NG4, Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), Apple SSD AP0256, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 i3-1115G4, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, Samsung PM991A MZALQ256HBJD, a-Si IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 22% | 27% | 35% | -8% | 18% | 42% | -4% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 5.42 | 4.3 21% | 3.3 39% | 3.7 32% | 5.4 -0% | 3.6 34% | 2.1 61% | 6.3 -16% |
| Idle Average * | 10.38 | 7.1 32% | 5 52% | 5.6 46% | 8.4 19% | 6.6 36% | 6.2 40% | 9.5 8% |
| Idle Maximum * | 11.17 | 7.2 36% | 7.5 33% | 7.8 30% | 11.3 -1% | 9.7 13% | 7 37% | 10.4 7% |
| Load Average * | 38.58 | 24.8 36% | 28 27% | 26.4 32% | 45.3 -17% | 38 2% | 24.7 36% | 32.7 15% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 39.7 | 28.8 27% | 46.6 -17% | |||||
| Load Maximum * | 47.58 | 54.3 -14% | 56 -18% | 31.4 34% | 63 -32% | 45 5% | 30.6 36% | 63.3 -33% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
电池寿命
附带的54Wh电池提供了体面的空闲和视频播放时间。然而，在我们的标准Wi-Fi 1.3测试中，在150cd/m2的亮度下，我们可以得到接近8.5小时的运行时间，这不算太坏，但也没什么可写的。
在150cd/m2的条件下，H.264 1080p视频播放提供了一个体面的10.5小时的电池备份，这与制造商的说法相差不大。对设备施加压力会导致电池运行时间的急剧减少。
附带的65W充电器可以在一个多小时15分钟内将设备从零完全充电到100%。捆绑的充电器可以在大约30分钟内完成50%的快速充电，但这只有在充电过程中关闭笔记本电脑时才是如此。
| Realme Book (Slim) i3-1115G4, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, 54 Wh | Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 i3-1115G4, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, 53 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 60.7 Wh | Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B R3 4300U, Vega 5, 48.85 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE R5 5500U, Vega 7, 56.5 Wh | Dell Latitude 15 3510 NK2MC i3-10110U, UHD Graphics 620, 40 Wh | Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3 i3-1000NG4, Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), 49.9 Wh | Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 i3-1115G4, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, 58 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 60% | 39% | 43% | 11% | -8% | 31% | 0% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1041 | 1604 54% | 1181 13% | 793 -24% | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 506 | 539 7% | 703 39% | 724 43% | 649 28% | 465 -8% | 661 31% | 454 -10% |
| Witcher 3 ultra | 117 | |||||||
| Load | 90 | 197 119% | 82 -9% | 121 34% |
Pros
Cons
评语。一个出色的首演
Realme试图提供一台笔记本电脑，在不破坏银行的情况下提供体面的性能，从该设备在我们的测试中的表现来看，似乎基本上是成功的。
机箱的结构很坚固，虽然内存是焊接的，但如果需要的话，还有空间可以更换固态硬盘和Wi-Fi卡。市场上没有太多搭载酷睿i3-1115G4的笔记本电脑，但就性能而言，与Realme Book最接近的竞争对手似乎是联想ThinkBook 14 G2。即使是戴尔Inspiron 15 5502，在许多基准测试中也落后了。
酷睿i3-1115G4可能不会在第一时间唤起人们的兴奋，但其单核性能与联想Yoga Slim 7中的酷睿i5-1135G7基本相当。 联想Yoga Slim 7而且比配备AMD Ryzen 5500U的 联想IdeaPad 5.
3:2的2K显示屏是Realme Book的强项之一，具有高PWM、宽视角和相当丰富的色彩，可以进一步校准以获得更多的准确性。舒适的键盘和大的触摸板是Realme Book的其他积极因素。
Realme在其首款笔记本电脑Realme Book（Slim）中几乎勾选了所有正确的方框。Realme Book (Slim)的售价为44,999英镑（600美元），对于那些希望在移动中增强其智能手机的基本办公或在线生产力的人来说，这是一个简单的推荐。
话虽如此，还是有一些值得强调的问题。存储子系统的性能还有改进的余地，尽管目标受众可以用目前的实现方式来解决。功耗虽然低，但与竞争对手相比并不经济。电池寿命也需要一些改进。
总的来说，我们对Realme Book（超薄）Core i3印象深刻。由于该公司在这次发布中特别使用了 "超薄 "的名称，我们想知道Realme是否在考虑在未来提供更强大的笔记本电脑。这将是一个有趣的提议，可以测试一下。
价格和可用性
Realme Book (Slim) Core i3可以从Realme India订购。起价为44,999英镑。这款笔记本电脑目前也可以在Flipkart以进一步的折扣价格为41,999英镑（560美元）。全球供货情况尚不清楚。
Realme Book (Slim)
- 10/28/2021 v7 (old)
Vaidyanathan Subramaniam
Price comparison
