小米Redmi Note 11S智能手机评测--90Hz AMOLED和108MP摄像头,售价200欧元(约199美元)。
那些不想花超过400欧元(约398美元)购买智能手机的人将在小米的红米系列中找到他们需要的东西。然而,目前的红米阵容以智能手机开始,甚至明显更实惠。你可以从五款中档智能手机中挑选,官方价格在170欧元(Redmi Note 11)到370欧元(Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G)。尽管他们的价格实惠,但总是有一个AMOLED显示屏。
对于那些将价格限制设定在200欧元的人来说,我们的Redmi Note 11S测试装置可能是一个很好的选择。这款6.43英寸的Android 智能手机配备了 联发科Helio G96和其集成的 ARM Mali-G57 MC2图形单元。此外,还有6GB的内存,高达128GB的存储空间,以及其他功能,如108MP的摄像头和33瓦的快速充电。我们的测试显示了Redmi Note 11S在日常操作中的表现。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
80 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2 | 179 g | 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.43" | 2400x1080 | |
78.9 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2022 | Motorola Moto G31 Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2 | 181 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.40" | 2400x1080 | |
77.6 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | Realme C35 T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1 | 189 g | 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.60" | 2408x1080 | |
78.5 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2022 | Nokia G21 T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1 | 190 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
78.1 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2 | 186 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.40" | 1600x720 | |
81.1 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4 | 178.8 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.43" | 2400x1080 | |
80 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 SD 680, Adreno 610 | 179 g | 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.43" | 2400x1080 |
外壳 - 一个没有IP认证的轻型塑料外壳
小米提供Redmi Note 11S,颜色为石墨灰、珍珠白和暮光蓝。它的磨砂表面使这个重量为179克(约6.3盎司)的小米手机相当不容易沾染指纹。
Redmi Note 11S的外壳以非常好的工艺给人留下深刻印象。边框和后盖都由塑料制成,与AMOLED面板一起形成一个稳定的单元。虽然电源键和音量摇杆在边框中的位置不是很紧,但它们仍然提供了一个非常好的压力点。
然而,与它的Redmi Note 10S前代产品相比,我们的测试装置失去了一些坚固性,因为夏米为其后续产品取消了IP53认证。制造商并没有说明对显示屏玻璃的保护方式。在交付状态下,有一个保护膜覆盖着显示屏。
除了一些细节之外,Redmi Note 11S和Redmi Note 10S的外观是相似的。显示屏继续占正面的84%左右,自拍镜仍然放在顶部显示屏边缘中央的打孔下面。背面持有一个四摄像头系统,其核心元素是一个108MP的传感器。
设备 - 具有10秒限制的始终开启功能
你可以从两个小米Redmi Note 11S型号中选择不同的存储尺寸。这款智能手机在制造商的网店中仅售200欧元,配备6GB LPDDR4X-RAM和64GB的UFS 2.2存储。另一方面,在我们测试的时候,第二个版本的128GB存储空间价格完全相同,所以你可以安全地忽略64GB版本。
与前代产品相比,小米Redmi Note 11S的设备几乎没有变化。它仍然缺乏5G支持和通知LED。同时,这款智能手机仍然非常适用于日常任务。除了microSD读卡器,它还包括一个3.5毫米音频端口,支持双SIM卡,一个支持USB-OTG的USB-C 2.0端口,立体声扬声器,一个红外传感器,蓝牙5.0,以及用于非接触式支付的NFC。
Redmi Note 11S的设备还包括一个永远在线的功能。然而,显示屏并不是持续活动的,而只是在你点击屏幕后10秒内显示时间和电池电量等信息。
微型SD卡读卡器
智能手机在使用我们的Angelbird AV Pro V60 microSD参考卡时达到了稳定的传输速率。然而,一段时间后,在连续读取时,传输率明显下降。另一方面,在复制测试中,Redmi Note 11S的速度几乎是其前辈的两倍。
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G (Angelbird V60) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Nokia G21 (Angelbird V60) | |
Realme C35 (Angelbird V60) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
Motorola Moto G31 (Angelbird V60) |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
软件 - MIUI 13和升级到Android 12
在这一点上,Redmi Note 11S运行的是Android 12,尽管它一开始是Android 11。伴随着小米的MIUI 13版用户界面。在我们测试的时候(8月底),Android 安全补丁是2022年6月1日的水平,所以它们仍然是相当最新的。
你可以删除所有预装的第三方应用程序,如Facebook、Spotify和AliExpress。对DRM Widevine L1的支持也使你能够以高清质量播放视频流。
通信和GNSS - 4G,稳定的Wi-Fi 5,以及精确的GPS
Redmi Note 11S在移动通信方面不是特别有天赋。5G不被支持,而且只有12个支持4G的频段。然而,由于20和28频段也包括在支持的频段中,你应该不会遇到任何接收问题,至少在欧洲地区。
Redmi Note 11S还通过蓝牙5.0、NFC和Wi-Fi 5进行通信。通过我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器,小米智能手机实现了非常稳定的WLAN传输速率。平均约为340 Mbit/s,它们属于你可以从Wi-Fi 5期望的范围。此外,作为我们的对比设备,Redmi Note 11S在WLAN中的整体速度略快。
Networking | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Average of class Smartphone (34.8 - 1875, n=191, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S | |
Nokia G21 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 | |
Realme C35 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Average of class Smartphone (40.5 - 1810, n=193, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S | |
Realme C35 | |
Nokia G21 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G | |
Motorola Moto G31 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Motorola Moto G31 | |
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S |
小米智能手机使用GPS(L1)、Glonass(E1)、Galileo(E1)和Beidou(B1)卫星导航系统确定其当前位置。在我们的测试中,它不仅迅速成功,而且在这方面非常准确。通过GPS测试应用程序,Redmi Note 11S在室内达到了2米(约6.6英尺)的精度,在室外甚至能够提高到1米(约3.3英尺)。
小米智能手机也非常适用于日常导航任务。Redmi Note 11S在大约10公里(约6.2英里)的自行车骑行过程中记录的路线与佳明Venu2健身追踪器一样准确。
电话功能和语音质量
小米的双SIM卡智能手机支持VoLTE和WLAN通话。在我们的测试中,它提供了一个良好的语音质量。在拨打固定电话或移动电话时,Redmi Note 11S可以将对话双方的声音清晰地传递给对方,而且容易理解。在扬声器模式下,通信也很容易成功,大声的噪音被相当可靠地过滤掉。
除了两张Nano-SIM卡外,卡盘还提供了一个可容纳1TB数据的microSD卡的空间。在0.595 W/kg(头部SAR)和SAR 0.936 W/kg(身体SAR),辐射值相对较低。
摄像头 - 四个摄像头,108MP
Redmi Note 11S的自拍相机提供1600万像素的分辨率,并以每秒30帧的1080p分辨率录制视频。它成功地拍摄了扎实的人像照片,细节清晰可见,颜色看起来很自然。你可以使用美容模式来优化图像。
108MP的主摄像头使用三星HM2作为图像传感器(f/1.9,1/1.52")。通过9-in-1像素分选,它可以拍摄1200万像素的照片,并由两个200万像素的传感器支持,用于微距和深度记录。当与更昂贵的智能手机的图像质量相比较时,Redmi Note 11S当然会输,但对于其价格级别来说,它仍然创造了非常体面的照片。
在最佳光线条件下,用108MP相机拍摄的照片看起来不错,特别是如果你将它们与Redmi Note 11的照片进行比较。由于其更大的图像传感器和更高的像素储备量,Redmi Note 11S能够比其红米兄弟姐妹明显捕捉到更多的图像细节。此外,颜色鲜艳,图像对比度丰富。 另一方面,主摄像头只在变焦记录中产生浑浊的细节。在夜间拍摄时,你也不得不接受一些妥协,因为它们很快就会变得模糊不清。
超广角摄像头(f/2.2)提供118度的视角,具有800万像素的分辨率。就质量而言,它无法与主摄像头竞争,因为它产生的图像即使在最好的光线条件下也会有明显的噪音,而且在相当低的清晰度水平下运行。
相比之下Redmi Note 10S相比,视频特性变得更糟。与前者的联发科Helio G95 相比,后者的 联发科Helio G96Redmi Note 11S不允许录制4K视频,而只允许在30FPS下录制最多1080p的视频。在录制视频时,在主摄像头和超广角摄像头之间切换是不可能的。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Tageslicht-Aufnahme 1Tageslicht-Aufnahme 2Ultraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLowlight-Aufnahme我们的测试实验室显示,在最佳光线条件下,主摄像头能够相当准确地再现色彩(最大Delta-E为12.3)。此外,我们的测试图的图片直到边缘都很清晰。然而,在只有1勒克斯的低光下,都无法再识别。
配件和保修 - 33瓦的充电器和保护罩
与小米Redmi Note 11S一起,还包括一个33瓦的充电器、USB线(Type-A转C)、SIM卡工具、保护罩和快速入门手册。制造商在其在线商店中没有为该智能手机提供任何特殊配件。
小米Redmi Note 11S的保修期为12个月。
输入设备和操作 - 响应式显示
由于其高达180赫兹的触摸扫描率,Redmi Note 11S的电容式触摸屏对输入的反应非常迅速,非常准确地执行。90赫兹的刷新率使动画和滚动菜单和网站的操作变得非常流畅。
你可以使用集成在电源按钮上的指纹传感器以生物识别方式解锁智能手机。这很快就能成功,而且识别率也很高。在良好的光线条件下,通过二维人脸识别进行认证的速度同样快,尽管作为一个纯粹的软件解决方案,其安全性不如指纹传感器。
显示屏 - AMOLED面板,90赫兹
Redmi Note 11S的AMOLED显示屏提供2400 x 1080像素的分辨率,可以调整为60或90赫兹的固定帧率。没有像一些旗舰级智能手机那样的自适应控制。不支持HDR。
在平均435.9cd/m²的情况下,AMOLED面板实现了坚实的亮度,但我们的测试装置既没有达到其Redmi Note 10S前辈的亮度,也没有达到其目前的Redmi Note 11兄弟姐妹机型的亮度。
小米承诺Redmi Note 11S的亮度水平高达1000尼特,但我们测量其显示屏的最大亮度为577 cd/m²(APL50测量值)。在没有激活亮度传感器的情况下,最高为436 cd/m²。在最低的亮度水平下,显示屏仍然产生2.42 cd/m²。
AMOLED屏幕使用脉宽调制进行亮度控制。在显示器亮度低于54%时,PWM闪烁的频率范围相当高,在174.5和401.7赫兹之间。在显示屏亮度大于54%时,频率为恒定的90赫兹,振幅水平非常平坦和均匀。
|
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 430 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4" | Motorola Moto G31 OLED, 2400x1080, 6.4" | Realme C35 IPS, 2408x1080, 6.6" | Nokia G21 IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Super AMOLED, 1600x720, 6.4" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 OLED, 2400x1080, 6.4" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -33% | -124% | -169% | -168% | -6% | 27% | |
Brightness middle | 430 | 423 -2% | 585 36% | 492 14% | 349 -19% | 706 64% | 702 63% |
Brightness | 436 | 425 -3% | 558 28% | 484 11% | 352 -19% | 701 61% | 701 61% |
Brightness Distribution | 97 | 94 -3% | 89 -8% | 86 -11% | 92 -5% | 98 1% | 98 1% |
Black Level * | 0.6 | 0.46 | |||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.2 | 1.58 -32% | 4.4 -267% | 6.02 -402% | 5.87 -389% | 2.1 -75% | 1 17% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.6 | 4.68 -80% | 8.77 -237% | 9.13 -251% | 15.51 -497% | 4.9 -88% | 2.3 12% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.5 | 2.7 -80% | 5.9 -293% | 7.1 -373% | 2.7 -80% | 1.5 -0% | 1.4 7% |
Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.219 99% | 2.228 99% | 2.345 94% | 2.07 106% | 2.29 96% | 2.2 100% |
CCT | 6379 102% | 6674 97% | 8001 81% | 8918 73% | 6970 93% | 6447 101% | 6520 100% |
Contrast | 975 | 1070 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 401.7 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 401.7 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 401.7 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
具有固定变焦水平和各种亮度设置的测量系列
你可以在显示设置中选择 "鲜艳"、"饱和 "和 "标准 "颜色预设。此外,你也可以调整色温。从 "鲜艳 "切换到 "标准 "预设时,你会得到最佳的色彩再现。正如我们用CalMAN软件和光谱光度计进行的测量所显示的那样,AMOLED面板随后将只有最小的颜色偏差,所有这些偏差也都在理想的目标范围内。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1.46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.7065 ms rise | |
↘ 0.7505 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
1.63 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.8288 ms rise | |
↘ 0.7988 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
在户外,Redmi Note 11S打出了一个好数字。如果你避免阳光直射,显示屏上的内容可以毫无障碍地阅读。由于AMOLED面板的高视角稳定性,在非常陡峭的侧视角度下也能正常工作。
性能 - 与前代产品相比,几乎没有任何改进
小米Redmi Note 11S使用 联发科Helio G96处理器。这款采用12纳米工艺生产的八核SoC提供了高达2.05GHz的时钟速度,并由集成的 ARM Mali-G57 MC2图形单元的支持。Helio G96配有LPDDR4X内存、UFS 2.2存储和4G移动通信。
Redmi Note 11S在几乎所有的合成基准测试中都比对比设备快,也击败了Redmi Note 11系列的入门级机型,即Redmi Note 11其 骁龙680.然而,与前代产品相比,我们的测试设备几乎无法向前推进。在AnTuTu v9和PCMark基准测试中,10S的性能表现为 Redmi Note 10S甚至更快。
CrossMark - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 2485, n=165, last 2 years) | |
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (440 - 518, n=2) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 |
AImark - Score v2.x | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S | |
Average Mediatek Helio G96 () | |
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S | |
Motorola Moto G31 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 | |
Realme C35 |
由于带有 ARM Mali-G57 MC2由于采用了ARM Mali-G57 MC2,Redmi Note 11S使用了比10S更弱的图形单元。 Redmi Note 10S但前者在图形基准测试中更快。总的来说,Redmi Note 11S在这里只处于中间位置。
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S | |
Motorola Moto G31 | |
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G | |
Realme C35 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 | |
Nokia G21 |
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S | |
Motorola Moto G31 | |
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G | |
Realme C35 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 | |
Nokia G21 |
3DMark / Wild Life Score | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S | |
Motorola Moto G31 | |
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G | |
Realme C35 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 | |
Nokia G21 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics | |
Realme C35 | |
Motorola Moto G31 | |
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 | |
Nokia G21 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S | |
Motorola Moto G31 | |
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 | |
Realme C35 | |
Nokia G21 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S | |
Motorola Moto G31 | |
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 | |
Realme C35 | |
Nokia G21 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | |
Realme C35 | |
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G | |
Motorola Moto G31 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 | |
Nokia G21 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S | |
Motorola Moto G31 | |
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 | |
Realme C35 | |
Nokia G21 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S | |
Motorola Moto G31 | |
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 | |
Realme C35 | |
Nokia G21 |
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics | |
Realme C35 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 | |
Motorola Moto G31 | |
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G | |
Nokia G21 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S |
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 | |
Motorola Moto G31 | |
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G | |
Realme C35 | |
Nokia G21 |
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 | |
Motorola Moto G31 | |
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G | |
Realme C35 | |
Nokia G21 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S | |
Motorola Moto G31 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 | |
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G | |
Realme C35 | |
Nokia G21 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S | |
Motorola Moto G31 | |
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 | |
Realme C35 | |
Nokia G21 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics | |
Realme C35 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 | |
Motorola Moto G31 | |
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S | |
Nokia G21 |
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 | |
Motorola Moto G31 | |
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G | |
Realme C35 | |
Nokia G21 |
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 | |
Motorola Moto G31 | |
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G | |
Realme C35 | |
Nokia G21 |
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics | |
Realme C35 | |
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G | |
Motorola Moto G31 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S | |
Nokia G21 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S | |
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S | |
Motorola Moto G31 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 | |
Realme C35 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S | |
Motorola Moto G31 | |
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 | |
Realme C35 |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S | |
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S | |
Motorola Moto G31 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 | |
Realme C35 |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S | |
Motorola Moto G31 | |
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 | |
Realme C35 |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S | |
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S | |
Motorola Moto G31 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 | |
Realme C35 |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S | |
Motorola Moto G31 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 | |
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G | |
Realme C35 |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S | |
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S | |
Motorola Moto G31 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 | |
Realme C35 |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S | |
Motorola Moto G31 | |
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 | |
Realme C35 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S | |
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S | |
Nokia G21 | |
Motorola Moto G31 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 | |
Realme C35 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S | |
Motorola Moto G31 | |
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 | |
Realme C35 | |
Nokia G21 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S | |
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S | |
Nokia G21 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 | |
Motorola Moto G31 | |
Realme C35 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 | |
Motorola Moto G31 | |
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G | |
Realme C35 | |
Nokia G21 |
在浏览器基准测试中,Redmi Note 11S提供了一个良好的性能。网站的渲染速度相当快,然后还可以流畅地滚动。11S有一个相当大的优势,那就是 Redmi Note 10S的优势可能主要是由于它的浏览器版本比较新。
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years) | |
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (42.5 - 62.2, n=2) | |
Realme C35 (Chrome 101) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S (Chrome 104.0.5112.97) | |
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G (Chrome 92) | |
Motorola Moto G31 (Chrome 97) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years) | |
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (34.4 - 52.7, n=2) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101) | |
Realme C35 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S (Chrome 104.0.5112.97) | |
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G (Chome 92) | |
Motorola Moto G31 (Chome 97) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101) | |
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (55 - 77, n=2) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S (Chrome 104.0.5112.97) | |
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G (Chrome 92) | |
Motorola Moto G31 (Chrome 97) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (17394 - 19873, n=2) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S (Chrome 104.0.5112.97) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101) | |
Motorola Moto G31 (Chrome 97) | |
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G (Chrome 92) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91) | |
Motorola Moto G31 (Chrome 97) | |
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G (Chrome 92) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S (Chrome 104.0.5112.97) | |
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (2560 - 2773, n=2) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
Redmi Note 11S与10S相比,实现了最大的性能提升。 Redmi Note 10S在存储性能方面实现了最大的飞跃。尽管有了UFS 2.2,它在名义上使用相同的存储类型,但在随机读取和写入访问方面明显更快。然而,由于顺序传输率几乎没有差别,应用程序的加载时间也大致相同。
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S | Motorola Moto G31 | Realme C35 | Nokia G21 | Samsung Galaxy A22 4G | Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 | Average 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -50% | -2% | -62% | -56% | -29% | 11% | -2% | 141% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 524.39 | 309.8 -41% | 907.1 73% | 257.6 -51% | 297.7 -43% | 498.8 -5% | 895.34 71% | 770 ? 47% | 1894 ? 261% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 446.46 | 221.5 -50% | 271.1 -39% | 180.6 -60% | 183 -59% | 372 -17% | 519.23 16% | 399 ? -11% | 1476 ? 231% |
Random Read 4KB | 214.82 | 84 -61% | 137.8 -36% | 74 -66% | 101.2 -53% | 110.5 -49% | 172.95 -19% | 156.6 ? -27% | 278 ? 29% |
Random Write 4KB | 216.24 | 109.8 -49% | 206.4 -5% | 60.2 -72% | 66.9 -69% | 121 -44% | 163.29 -24% | 177.7 ? -18% | 312 ? 44% |
游戏--可实现流畅的游戏体验
芯片ARM Mali-G57 MC2Redmi Note 11S中使用的图形单元能够流畅地显示游戏,只要图形细节不设置得太高。例如,在《PUBG》移动版中,在高清/高的设置下,可以实现30FPS的恒定。在图形较简单的游戏中,如Armajet和Subway Surfers,帧率甚至在60FPS左右。然而,Armajet的不同帧率也表明,SoC在这里已经达到了它的性能极限。
我们用我们的Gamebench来测量游戏的帧率。测试工具测量游戏的帧率。
排放 - 始终保持低温运行
温度
当运行时,Redmi Note 11S从未超过手部温度。经过一个小时的持续压力测试,我们测量到小米智能手机表面的最高温度只有36.3℃(97.3°F)。它几乎在任何时候都能使用其全部SoC性能。我们在3DMark Wild Life压力测试中测得的性能下降是如此之小,以至于没有意义。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Wild Life Stress Test
3DMark | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Motorola Moto G31 | |
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S | |
Motorola Moto G31 | |
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G |
发言人
Redmi Note 11S的设备包括立体声扬声器,这在高达200欧元(约199美元)的价格范围内是个例外。作为典型的智能手机,双扬声器听起来相当薄,但仍能相当好地再现声音。然而,低音是罕见的。另一方面,音频端口听起来很干净,没有噪音,信噪比达到了93dBFS。
你可以使用3.5毫米音频端口或蓝牙5.0连接外部音频设备与Redmi Note 11S。通常的蓝牙音频编解码器,如AAC、SBC、LDHC、aptX、aptX HD和aptX Adaptive都受到支持。
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命 - 稳固但不突出
消耗功率
小米智能手机可以使用附带的33瓦特充电器快速充电。在我们的测试中,将5000毫安时的电池从0充到80%需要37分钟。然后,电池在52分钟后被完全充满。
有趣的是,充电的速度几乎没有小米Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G兄弟机型的充电速度为51分钟,尽管该智能手机使用67瓦的充电器。虽然Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G在开始时充电较快,但随后充电曲线下降得相当快,最后几乎达到相同的充电时间。
Redmi Note 11S的耗电量并不显眼。
Off / Standby | 0.04 / 0.18 Watt |
Idle | 0.89 / 1.87 / 1.9 Watt |
Load |
3.01 / 6.26 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5000 mAh | Motorola Moto G31 5000 mAh | Realme C35 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A22 4G 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 5000 mAh | Average Mediatek Helio G96 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 11% | 19% | -17% | 11% | 4% | -9% | -28% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.89 | 0.7 21% | 0.8 10% | 1.5 -69% | 0.69 22% | 1.06 -19% | 0.945 ? -6% | 0.883 ? 1% |
Idle Average * | 1.87 | 0.9 52% | 1.1 41% | 2.1 -12% | 1.46 22% | 1.93 -3% | 1.585 ? 15% | 1.467 ? 22% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.9 | 1.3 32% | 1.4 26% | 2.5 -32% | 1.5 21% | 1.96 -3% | 1.7 ? 11% | 1.621 ? 15% |
Load Average * | 3.01 | 3.5 -16% | 3.1 -3% | 2.9 4% | 3.67 -22% | 2.87 5% | 4.41 ? -47% | 6.58 ? -119% |
Load Maximum * | 6.26 | 8.5 -36% | 5.1 19% | 4.9 22% | 5.58 11% | 3.85 38% | 7.43 ? -19% | 9.91 ? -58% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)
电池寿命
其5000毫安时的电池为Redmi Note 11S的良好电池寿命做出了贡献。在我们的模拟网络冲浪中,这款智能手机可以持续12小时左右,而在播放视频时,略微超过16小时。然而,在电池容量相同的情况下,所有的对比设备的持续时间仍然明显更长,特别是包括Redmi Note 10S前身。
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5000 mAh | Motorola Moto G31 5000 mAh | Realme C35 5000 mAh | Nokia G21 5050 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A22 4G 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 5000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 16% | 32% | 50% | 40% | 47% | 16% | |
Reader / Idle | 1663 | 2140 29% | 2867 72% | 3612 117% | 2098 26% | ||
H.264 | 971 | 1294 33% | 1297 34% | 1172 21% | 1076 11% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 725 | 1032 42% | 958 32% | 1087 50% | 1252 73% | 1087 50% | 842 16% |
Load | 376 | 226 -40% | 299 -20% | 368 -2% | 409 9% |
Pros
Cons
对小米Redmi Note 11S的评判
通过Redmi Note 11S,小米提供了一个良好的中低端智能手机。以200欧元(约199美元)的官方价格,那些可以不使用5G的人将得到一部做工良好、日常操作性能稳定的智能手机。该 联发科Helio G96和6GB的内存确保大多数应用程序的运行没有任何问题,延迟成为例外。
以200欧元的价格,小米Redmi Note 11S提供了很多物美价廉的智能手机,包括一个90赫兹的AMOLED屏幕。然而,在某些方面,它比它的前辈更差。
小米智能手机的AMOLED屏幕变得特别有趣,它以90赫兹的刷新率确保了吸引人的流畅操作。除显示屏外,Redmi Note 11S还拥有立体声扬声器、不错的电池寿命和108万像素的摄像头,在最佳光线条件下能成功拍摄出好照片。33瓦的充电器可以快速为智能手机充电。
Redmi Note 11S几乎没有区别于其Redmi Note 10S 前身,除了提供更多最新版本的Android 和支持DRM Widevine L1外,几乎没有任何优势。此外,我们的测试设备在某些方面也没有任何改进:由于改用了联发科Helio G96,图形性能更弱,而且现在不支持4K,只支持全高清视频录制。电池寿命也变差了,而且IP53认证被取消了。因此,从上一代产品升级是不值得的。
小米Redmi Note 11S的替代品是,例如 诺基亚G21和三星Galaxy A22 4G这两款手机价格更实惠,性能和设备相似,也提供90Hz的屏幕。然而,只有三星还包括一个AMOLED屏幕。
价格和可用性
在我们测试的时候,128GB版本的Redmi Note 11S,例如从亚马逊购买,价格为246美元 。 小米 公司的网店 也列出了这款智能手机,但没有提供任何在美国的购买选项。
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
- 09/01/2022 v7 (old)
Manuel Masiero