小米Redmi Note 11S智能手机评测--90Hz AMOLED和108MP摄像头，售价200欧元（约199美元）。

Name: Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Brand: Xiaomi

勤俭节约的人。

虽然小米Redmi Note 11S的官方价格只有200欧元（约199美元），但它仍然提供了广泛的设备。这款6.43英寸智能手机的亮点是其90赫兹的AMOLED面板，它提供了非常好的图像质量。此外，设备还包括一个108万像素的摄像头，一个5000毫安时的电池，以及一个用于快速充电的33瓦的充电器。我们的测试表明它是否值得购买。

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 09/05/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Smartphone Touchscreen

那些不想花超过400欧元（约398美元）购买智能手机的人将在小米的红米系列中找到他们需要的东西。然而，目前的红米阵容以智能手机开始，甚至明显更实惠。你可以从五款中档智能手机中挑选，官方价格在170欧元(Redmi Note 11)到370欧元(Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G)。尽管他们的价格实惠，但总是有一个AMOLED显示屏。

对于那些将价格限制设定在200欧元的人来说，我们的Redmi Note 11S测试装置可能是一个很好的选择。这款6.43英寸的Android 智能手机配备了联发科Helio G96和其集成的 ARM Mali-G57 MC2图形单元。此外，还有6GB的内存，高达128GB的存储空间，以及其他功能，如108MP的摄像头和33瓦的快速充电。我们的测试显示了Redmi Note 11S在日常操作中的表现。

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S (Redmi Note 12 Series)

Processor

Mediatek Helio G96 8 x 2 - 2.1 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G57 MP2

Memory

6 GB

, LPDDR4X

Display

6.43 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 409 PPI, capacitive, AMOLED, FHD+, glossy: yes, 90 Hz

Storage

64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 64 GB

, 42 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio port, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB (exFAT supported), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: proximity sensor, accelerometer, electronic compass, gyroscope, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3, IR blaster

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Bands 1/2/4/5/8), 4G (Bands 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/20/28/38/40/41), Head SAR 0.595 W/kg , Body SAR 0.936 W/kg , Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.09 x 159.87 x 73.87

Battery

5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 11

Camera

Primary Camera: 108 MPix (Samsung HM2, f/1.9, 1/1.52", 0.7µm) + 8MP ultrawide camera (f/2.2, FOV 118°) + 2MP macro camera (f/2.4) + 2MP depth camera (f/2.4), videos up to 1080p@30fps
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.4, videos up to 1080p @ 30fps

Additional features

Speakers: dual speakers, Keyboard: virtual, 33W charger, USB cable (type A to C), SIM tool, protective case, quick start guide, warranty card, MIUI 13, 12 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

179 g, Power Supply: 88 g

Price

200 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
80 % v7 ^(old)	09 / 2022	Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2	179 g	64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.43"	2400x1080
78.9 % v7 ^(old)	01 / 2022	Motorola Moto G31 Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2	181 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.40"	2400x1080
77.6 % v7 ^(old)	05 / 2022	Realme C35 T7255, Mali-G57 MP1	189 g	64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.60"	2408x1080
78.5 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2022	Nokia G21 T7200, Mali-G57 MP1	190 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.50"	1600x720
78.1 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2021	Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2	186 g	128 GB eMMC Flash	6.40"	1600x720
81.1 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2021	Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4	178.8 g	128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.43"	2400x1080
80 % v7 ^(old)	05 / 2022	Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 SD 680, Adreno 610	179 g	64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.43"	2400x1080

外壳 - 一个没有IP认证的轻型塑料外壳

小米提供Redmi Note 11S，颜色为石墨灰、珍珠白和暮光蓝。它的磨砂表面使这个重量为179克（约6.3盎司）的小米手机相当不容易沾染指纹。

Redmi Note 11S的外壳以非常好的工艺给人留下深刻印象。边框和后盖都由塑料制成，与AMOLED面板一起形成一个稳定的单元。虽然电源键和音量摇杆在边框中的位置不是很紧，但它们仍然提供了一个非常好的压力点。

然而，与它的Redmi Note 10S前代产品相比，我们的测试装置失去了一些坚固性，因为夏米为其后续产品取消了IP53认证。制造商并没有说明对显示屏玻璃的保护方式。在交付状态下，有一个保护膜覆盖着显示屏。

除了一些细节之外，Redmi Note 11S和Redmi Note 10S的外观是相似的。显示屏继续占正面的84%左右，自拍镜仍然放在顶部显示屏边缘中央的打孔下面。背面持有一个四摄像头系统，其核心元素是一个108MP的传感器。

尺寸比较

Nokia G21 Realme C35 Motorola Moto G31 Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Samsung Galaxy A22 4G DIN A6 ❌

设备 - 具有10秒限制的始终开启功能

你可以从两个小米Redmi Note 11S型号中选择不同的存储尺寸。这款智能手机在制造商的网店中仅售200欧元，配备6GB LPDDR4X-RAM和64GB的UFS 2.2存储。另一方面，在我们测试的时候，第二个版本的128GB存储空间价格完全相同，所以你可以安全地忽略64GB版本。

与前代产品相比，小米Redmi Note 11S的设备几乎没有变化。它仍然缺乏5G支持和通知LED。同时，这款智能手机仍然非常适用于日常任务。除了microSD读卡器，它还包括一个3.5毫米音频端口，支持双SIM卡，一个支持USB-OTG的USB-C 2.0端口，立体声扬声器，一个红外传感器，蓝牙5.0，以及用于非接触式支付的NFC。

Redmi Note 11S的设备还包括一个永远在线的功能。然而，显示屏并不是持续活动的，而只是在你点击屏幕后10秒内显示时间和电池电量等信息。

微型SD卡读卡器

智能手机在使用我们的Angelbird AV Pro V60 microSD参考卡时达到了稳定的传输速率。然而，一段时间后，在连续读取时，传输率明显下降。另一方面，在复制测试中，Redmi Note 11S的速度几乎是其前辈的两倍。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)	44.2 MB/s +24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	35.73 MB/s
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	24.74 MB/s -31%
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)	20.6 MB/s -42%
Realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)	20.5 MB/s -43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	18.76 MB/s -47%
Motorola Moto G31 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)	17.7 MB/s -50%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø36.5 (25.2-45.7)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø71.4 (33.3-76.8)

软件 - MIUI 13和升级到Android 12

在这一点上，Redmi Note 11S运行的是Android 12，尽管它一开始是Android 11。伴随着小米的MIUI 13版用户界面。在我们测试的时候（8月底），Android 安全补丁是2022年6月1日的水平，所以它们仍然是相当最新的。

你可以删除所有预装的第三方应用程序，如Facebook、Spotify和AliExpress。对DRM Widevine L1的支持也使你能够以高清质量播放视频流。

通信和GNSS - 4G，稳定的Wi-Fi 5，以及精确的GPS

Redmi Note 11S在移动通信方面不是特别有天赋。5G不被支持，而且只有12个支持4G的频段。然而，由于20和28频段也包括在支持的频段中，你应该不会遇到任何接收问题，至少在欧洲地区。

Redmi Note 11S还通过蓝牙5.0、NFC和Wi-Fi 5进行通信。通过我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器，小米智能手机实现了非常稳定的WLAN传输速率。平均约为340 Mbit/s，它们属于你可以从Wi-Fi 5期望的范围。此外，作为我们的对比设备，Redmi Note 11S在WLAN中的整体速度略快。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone (34.8 - 1875, n=185, last 2 years)	713 MBit/s +119%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	325 (289^min - 340^max) MBit/s
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB eMMC Flash	299 (224^min - 315^max) MBit/s -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	298 (198^min - 345^max) MBit/s -8%
Realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	244 (179^min - 255^max) MBit/s -25%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone (40.5 - 1810, n=187, last 2 years)	730 MBit/s +101%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	364 (176^min - 384^max) MBit/s
Realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	347 (309^min - 366^max) MBit/s -5%
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB eMMC Flash	339 (328^min - 362^max) MBit/s -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	322 (162^min - 386^max) MBit/s -12%
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash	346 (267^min - 353^max) MBit/s
Motorola Moto G31 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash	346 (334^min - 352^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	283 (145^min - 322^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Motorola Moto G31 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash	353 (261^min - 359^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash	328 (255^min - 340^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	320 (299^min - 340^max) MBit/s

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø325 (289-340)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø358 (176-384)

小米智能手机使用GPS（L1）、Glonass（E1）、Galileo（E1）和Beidou（B1）卫星导航系统确定其当前位置。在我们的测试中，它不仅迅速成功，而且在这方面非常准确。通过GPS测试应用程序，Redmi Note 11S在室内达到了2米（约6.6英尺）的精度，在室外甚至能够提高到1米（约3.3英尺）。

小米智能手机也非常适用于日常导航任务。Redmi Note 11S在大约10公里（约6.2英里）的自行车骑行过程中记录的路线与佳明Venu2健身追踪器一样准确。

电话功能和语音质量

小米的双SIM卡智能手机支持VoLTE和WLAN通话。在我们的测试中，它提供了一个良好的语音质量。在拨打固定电话或移动电话时，Redmi Note 11S可以将对话双方的声音清晰地传递给对方，而且容易理解。在扬声器模式下，通信也很容易成功，大声的噪音被相当可靠地过滤掉。

除了两张Nano-SIM卡外，卡盘还提供了一个可容纳1TB数据的microSD卡的空间。在0.595 W/kg（头部SAR）和SAR 0.936 W/kg（身体SAR），辐射值相对较低。

摄像头 - 四个摄像头，108MP

Redmi Note 11S的自拍相机提供1600万像素的分辨率，并以每秒30帧的1080p分辨率录制视频。它成功地拍摄了扎实的人像照片，细节清晰可见，颜色看起来很自然。你可以使用美容模式来优化图像。

108MP的主摄像头使用三星HM2作为图像传感器（f/1.9，1/1.52"）。通过9-in-1像素分选，它可以拍摄1200万像素的照片，并由两个200万像素的传感器支持，用于微距和深度记录。当与更昂贵的智能手机的图像质量相比较时，Redmi Note 11S当然会输，但对于其价格级别来说，它仍然创造了非常体面的照片。

在最佳光线条件下，用108MP相机拍摄的照片看起来不错，特别是如果你将它们与Redmi Note 11的照片进行比较。由于其更大的图像传感器和更高的像素储备量，Redmi Note 11S能够比其红米兄弟姐妹明显捕捉到更多的图像细节。此外，颜色鲜艳，图像对比度丰富。另一方面，主摄像头只在变焦记录中产生浑浊的细节。在夜间拍摄时，你也不得不接受一些妥协，因为它们很快就会变得模糊不清。

超广角摄像头（f/2.2）提供118度的视角，具有800万像素的分辨率。就质量而言，它无法与主摄像头竞争，因为它产生的图像即使在最好的光线条件下也会有明显的噪音，而且在相当低的清晰度水平下运行。

相比之下Redmi Note 10S相比，视频特性变得更糟。与前者的联发科Helio G95 相比，后者的联发科Helio G96Redmi Note 11S不允许录制4K视频，而只允许在30FPS下录制最多1080p的视频。在录制视频时，在主摄像头和超广角摄像头之间切换是不可能的。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Tageslicht-Aufnahme 1 Tageslicht-Aufnahme 2 Ultraweitwinkel 5-facher Zoom Lowlight-Aufnahme

click to load images

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S

Canon EOS 90D

Apple iPhone 13 Pro

Xiaomi 12 Pro

click to load images

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S

Canon EOS 90D

Apple iPhone 13 Pro

Xiaomi 12 Pro

click to load images

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S

Canon EOS 90D

Apple iPhone 13 Pro

Xiaomi 12 Pro

click to load images

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S

Canon EOS 90D

Apple iPhone 13 Pro

Xiaomi 12 Pro

click to load images

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S

Canon EOS 90D

Apple iPhone 13 Pro

Xiaomi 12 Pro

我们的测试实验室显示，在最佳光线条件下，主摄像头能够相当准确地再现色彩（最大Delta-E为12.3）。此外，我们的测试图的图片直到边缘都很清晰。然而，在只有1勒克斯的低光下，都无法再识别。

ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S: 6.84 ∆E min: 1.93 - max: 12.3 ∆E

配件和保修 - 33瓦的充电器和保护罩

与小米Redmi Note 11S一起，还包括一个33瓦的充电器、USB线（Type-A转C）、SIM卡工具、保护罩和快速入门手册。制造商在其在线商店中没有为该智能手机提供任何特殊配件。

小米Redmi Note 11S的保修期为12个月。

输入设备和操作 - 响应式显示

由于其高达180赫兹的触摸扫描率，Redmi Note 11S的电容式触摸屏对输入的反应非常迅速，非常准确地执行。90赫兹的刷新率使动画和滚动菜单和网站的操作变得非常流畅。

你可以使用集成在电源按钮上的指纹传感器以生物识别方式解锁智能手机。这很快就能成功，而且识别率也很高。在良好的光线条件下，通过二维人脸识别进行认证的速度同样快，尽管作为一个纯粹的软件解决方案，其安全性不如指纹传感器。

▶ load Youtube video

显示屏 - AMOLED面板，90赫兹

Redmi Note 11S的AMOLED显示屏提供2400 x 1080像素的分辨率，可以调整为60或90赫兹的固定帧率。没有像一些旗舰级智能手机那样的自适应控制。不支持HDR。

在平均435.9cd/m²的情况下，AMOLED面板实现了坚实的亮度，但我们的测试装置既没有达到其Redmi Note 10S前辈的亮度，也没有达到其目前的Redmi Note 11兄弟姐妹机型的亮度。

小米承诺Redmi Note 11S的亮度水平高达1000尼特，但我们测量其显示屏的最大亮度为577 cd/m²（APL50测量值）。在没有激活亮度传感器的情况下，最高为436 cd/m²。在最低的亮度水平下，显示屏仍然产生2.42 cd/m²。

AMOLED屏幕使用脉宽调制进行亮度控制。在显示器亮度低于54%时，PWM闪烁的频率范围相当高，在174.5和401.7赫兹之间。在显示屏亮度大于54%时，频率为恒定的90赫兹，振幅水平非常平坦和均匀。


441 cd/m²	429 cd/m²	432 cd/m²
443 cd/m²	430 cd/m²	437 cd/m²
443 cd/m²	435 cd/m²	433 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 443 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 435.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.42 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 430 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4"	Motorola Moto G31 OLED, 2400x1080, 6.4"	Realme C35 IPS, 2408x1080, 6.6"	Nokia G21 IPS, 1600x720, 6.5"	Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Super AMOLED, 1600x720, 6.4"	Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4"	Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 OLED, 2400x1080, 6.4"
Screen		-33%	-124%	-169%	-168%	-6%	27%
Brightness middle	430	423 -2%	585 36%	492 14%	349 -19%	706 64%	702 63%
Brightness	436	425 -3%	558 28%	484 11%	352 -19%	701 61%	701 61%
Brightness Distribution	97	94 -3%	89 -8%	86 -11%	92 -5%	98 1%	98 1%
Black Level *			0.6	0.46
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.2	1.58 -32%	4.4 -267%	6.02 -402%	5.87 -389%	2.1 -75%	1 17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.6	4.68 -80%	8.77 -237%	9.13 -251%	15.51 -497%	4.9 -88%	2.3 12%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.5	2.7 -80%	5.9 -293%	7.1 -373%	2.7 -80%	1.5 -0%	1.4 7%
Gamma	2.23 ^99%	2.219 ^99%	2.228 ^99%	2.345 ^94%	2.07 ^106%	2.29 ^96%	2.2 ^100%
CCT	6379 ^102%	6674 ^97%	8001 ^81%	8918 ^73%	6970 ^93%	6447 ^101%	6520 ^100%
Contrast			975	1070

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

401.7 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 401.7 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 401.7 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8738 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

具有固定变焦水平和各种亮度设置的测量系列

你可以在显示设置中选择 "鲜艳"、"饱和 "和 "标准 "颜色预设。此外，你也可以调整色温。从 "鲜艳 "切换到 "标准 "预设时，你会得到最佳的色彩再现。正如我们用CalMAN软件和光谱光度计进行的测量所显示的那样，AMOLED面板随后将只有最小的颜色偏差，所有这些偏差也都在理想的目标范围内。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.7065 ms rise
1.46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.7505 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.63 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.8288 ms rise
1.63 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.7988 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

在户外，Redmi Note 11S打出了一个好数字。如果你避免阳光直射，显示屏上的内容可以毫无障碍地阅读。由于AMOLED面板的高视角稳定性，在非常陡峭的侧视角度下也能正常工作。

性能 - 与前代产品相比，几乎没有任何改进

小米Redmi Note 11S使用联发科Helio G96处理器。这款采用12纳米工艺生产的八核SoC提供了高达2.05GHz的时钟速度，并由集成的 ARM Mali-G57 MC2图形单元的支持。Helio G96配有LPDDR4X内存、UFS 2.2存储和4G移动通信。

Redmi Note 11S在几乎所有的合成基准测试中都比对比设备快，也击败了Redmi Note 11系列的入门级机型，即Redmi Note 11其骁龙680.然而，与前代产品相比，我们的测试设备几乎无法向前推进。在AnTuTu v9和PCMark基准测试中，10S的性能表现为 Redmi Note 10S甚至更快。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=174, last 2 years)	1007 Points +91%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	528 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (466 - 530, n=3)	508 Points -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	507 Points -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	384 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	364 Points -31%
Motorola Moto G31 Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	353 Points -33%
Nokia G21 Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	312 Points -41%
Realme C35 Unisoc T7255, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	298 Points -44%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 8816, n=174, last 2 years)	3359 Points +80%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	1863 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (1688 - 1863, n=3)	1769 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	1738 Points -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	1685 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1370 Points -26%
Motorola Moto G31 Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1295 Points -30%
Nokia G21 Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	1185 Points -36%
Realme C35 Unisoc T7255, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	1184 Points -36%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (99654 - 1650926, n=104, last 2 years)	798401 Points +169%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	330876 Points +11%
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (297002 - 363022, n=2)	330012 Points +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	297002 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	252044 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	204547 Points -31%
Motorola Moto G31 Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	191865 Points -35%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone (4609 - 24088, n=191, last 2 years)	12972 Points +60%
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (8115 - 9209, n=3)	8540 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	8236 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	8115 Points
Realme C35 Unisoc T7255, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	8066 Points -1%
Nokia G21 Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	7805 Points -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	7694 Points -5%
Motorola Moto G31 Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	6596 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	6570 Points -19%

CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 1517, n=158, last 2 years)	885 Points +101%
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (440 - 518, n=2)	479 Points +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	440 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	388 Points -12%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=152, last 2 years)	6326 Points +135%
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (2696 - 3072, n=2)	2884 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	2738 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	2696 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	2346 Points -13%
Motorola Moto G31 Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	2229 Points -17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	1566 Points -42%
System
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=152, last 2 years)	10181 Points +103%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	5794 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	5353 Points +7%
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (5016 - 5684, n=2)	5350 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	5016 Points
Motorola Moto G31 Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	4366 Points -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2083 Points -58%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=152, last 2 years)	6785 Points +107%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	3824 Points +17%
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (3280 - 4282, n=2)	3781 Points +15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	3280 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	2843 Points -13%
Motorola Moto G31 Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	2691 Points -18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	1012 Points -69%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=152, last 2 years)	17165 Points +521%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	3178 Points +15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	2763 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (2666 - 2763, n=2)	2715 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	2183 Points -21%
Motorola Moto G31 Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1838 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1811 Points -34%
Web
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=152, last 2 years)	1566 Points +35%
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (1163 - 1372, n=2)	1268 Points +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	1199 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	1163 Points
Motorola Moto G31 Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1143 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1099 Points -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	898 Points -23%

AImark - Score v2.x
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	7697 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G96 ()	7697 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	7242 Points -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	6118 Points -21%
Motorola Moto G31 Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	5912 Points -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	4995 Points -35%
Realme C35 Unisoc T7255, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096	4725 Points -39%

由于带有 ARM Mali-G57 MC2由于采用了ARM Mali-G57 MC2，Redmi Note 11S使用了比10S更弱的图形单元。 Redmi Note 10S但前者在图形基准测试中更快。总的来说，Redmi Note 11S在这里只处于中间位置。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	326 Points
Motorola Moto G31 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash	181 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash	174 Points -47%
Realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	129 Points -60%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	127 Points -61%
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB eMMC Flash	111 Points -66%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1003 Points
Motorola Moto G31 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash	717 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash	686 Points -32%
Realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	464 Points -54%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	435 Points -57%
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB eMMC Flash	393 Points -61%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1181 Points
Motorola Moto G31 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash	719 Points -39%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash	679 Points -43%
Realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	463 Points -61%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	447 Points -62%
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB eMMC Flash	397 Points -66%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2628 Points +21%
Motorola Moto G31 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2488 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2423 Points +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2375 Points +10%
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2298 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2168 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2110 Points -3%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2845 Points +24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2286 Points
Motorola Moto G31 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1271 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1224 Points -46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1155 Points -49%
Realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	919 Points -60%
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB eMMC Flash	783 Points -66%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2641 Points +17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2259 Points
Motorola Moto G31 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1426 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1375 Points -39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1253 Points -45%
Realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1074 Points -52%
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB eMMC Flash	917 Points -59%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3036 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2675 Points +10%
Motorola Moto G31 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2603 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2573 Points +6%
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2559 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2488 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2434 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2743 Points +17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2341 Points
Motorola Moto G31 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1267 Points -46%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1211 Points -48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1199 Points -49%
Realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	939 Points -60%
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB eMMC Flash	814 Points -65%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2682 Points +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2361 Points
Motorola Moto G31 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1430 Points -39%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1379 Points -42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1372 Points -42%
Realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1109 Points -53%
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB eMMC Flash	959 Points -59%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2957 Points +30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2654 Points +16%
Motorola Moto G31 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2601 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2565 Points +12%
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2400 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2372 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2281 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3558 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3453 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1995 Points -42%
Motorola Moto G31 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1674 Points -52%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1604 Points -54%
Realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1471 Points -57%
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1236 Points -64%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3202 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3099 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2113 Points -32%
Motorola Moto G31 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1818 Points -41%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1750 Points -44%
Realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1656 Points -47%
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1385 Points -55%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2587 Points +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2383 Points
Motorola Moto G31 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1408 Points -41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1365 Points -43%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1354 Points -43%
Realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1103 Points -54%
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB eMMC Flash	945 Points -60%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2633 Points +15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2280 Points
Motorola Moto G31 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1246 Points -45%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1198 Points -47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1188 Points -48%
Realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	935 Points -59%
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB eMMC Flash	806 Points -65%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2959 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2829 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2683 Points -5%
Motorola Moto G31 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2578 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2492 Points -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2436 Points -14%
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2379 Points -16%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3274 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3120 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2085 Points -36%
Motorola Moto G31 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1785 Points -45%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1783 Points -46%
Realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1710 Points -48%
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1414 Points -57%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3648 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3335 Points -9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1931 Points -47%
Motorola Moto G31 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1633 Points -55%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1630 Points -55%
Realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1518 Points -58%
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1255 Points -66%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3063 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2654 Points +10%
Motorola Moto G31 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2644 Points +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2589 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2547 Points +6%
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2546 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2410 Points

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	60 fps +15%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash	59 fps +13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	52 fps
Motorola Moto G31 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash	40 fps -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	37 fps -29%
Realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	23 fps -56%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	85 fps +35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	63 fps
Motorola Moto G31 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash	45 fps -29%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash	44 fps -30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	42 fps -33%
Realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	26 fps -59%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	49 fps +58%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash	42 fps +35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	31 fps
Motorola Moto G31 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash	22 fps -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	17 fps -45%
Realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	14 fps -55%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	52 fps +37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	38 fps
Motorola Moto G31 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash	25 fps -34%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash	24 fps -37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	20 fps -47%
Realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	16 fps -58%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	31 fps +55%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash	30 fps +50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	20 fps
Motorola Moto G31 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash	14 fps -30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	13 fps -35%
Realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.7 fps -56%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	32 fps +28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	25 fps
Motorola Moto G31 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash	16 fps -36%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	16 fps -36%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash	15 fps -40%
Realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	9.9 fps -60%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	18 fps +50%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash	16 fps +33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	12 fps
Motorola Moto G31 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash	8.5 fps -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7.3 fps -39%
Realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5 fps -58%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	19 fps +27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	15 fps
Motorola Moto G31 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash	9.6 fps -36%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash	9.3 fps -38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.6 fps -43%
Realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.9 fps -61%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	12 fps +41%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash	9.5 fps +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.5 fps
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB eMMC Flash	6 fps -29%
Motorola Moto G31 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash	5.4 fps -36%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5 fps -41%
Realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3.4 fps -60%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7.4 fps +30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.7 fps
Motorola Moto G31 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash	3.5 fps -39%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash	3.3 fps -42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3.2 fps -44%
Realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2.2 fps -61%
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2 fps -65%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	19 fps +46%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash	17 fps +31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	13 fps
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB eMMC Flash	9.5 fps -27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.8 fps -32%
Motorola Moto G31 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash	8.4 fps -35%
Realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.4 fps -58%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	20 fps +25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	16 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	9.8 fps -39%
Motorola Moto G31 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash	9.6 fps -40%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash	9.2 fps -42%
Realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.1 fps -62%
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB eMMC Flash	5.2 fps -67%

在浏览器基准测试中，Redmi Note 11S提供了一个良好的性能。网站的渲染速度相当快，然后还可以流畅地滚动。11S有一个相当大的优势，那就是 Redmi Note 10S的优势可能主要是由于它的浏览器版本比较新。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=162, last 2 years)	121 Points +184%
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (42.5 - 62.2, n=2)	52.4 Points +23%
Realme C35 (Chrome 101)	45.399 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101)	43.525 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S (Chrome 104.0.5112.97)	42.542 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G (Chrome 92)	31.57 Points -26%
Motorola Moto G31 (Chrome 97)	31.19 Points -27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)	16.92 Points -60%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=148, last 2 years)	137.4 runs/min +299%
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (34.4 - 52.7, n=2)	43.6 runs/min +27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101)	39.64 runs/min +15%
Realme C35	34.44 runs/min 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S (Chrome 104.0.5112.97)	34.4 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G (Chome 92)	29.1 runs/min -15%
Motorola Moto G31 (Chome 97)	27.9 runs/min -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)	14.7 runs/min -57%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points +170%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101)	67 Points +22%
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (55 - 77, n=2)	66 Points +20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S (Chrome 104.0.5112.97)	55 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G (Chrome 92)	51 Points -7%
Motorola Moto G31 (Chrome 97)	45 Points -18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)	28 Points -49%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)	37278 Points +114%
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (17394 - 19873, n=2)	18634 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S (Chrome 104.0.5112.97)	17394 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101)	13056 Points -25%
Motorola Moto G31 (Chrome 97)	11597 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G (Chrome 92)	11313 Points -35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)	4808 Points -72%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)	10797 ms * -289%
Motorola Moto G31 (Chrome 97)	3469 ms * -25%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G (Chrome 92)	3349 ms * -21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101)	3234.1 ms * -17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S (Chrome 104.0.5112.97)	2773.2 ms *
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (2560 - 2773, n=2)	2667 ms * +4%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years)	1563 ms * +44%

* ... smaller is better

Redmi Note 11S与10S相比，实现了最大的性能提升。 Redmi Note 10S在存储性能方面实现了最大的飞跃。尽管有了UFS 2.2，它在名义上使用相同的存储类型，但在随机读取和写入访问方面明显更快。然而，由于顺序传输率几乎没有差别，应用程序的加载时间也大致相同。

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S	Motorola Moto G31	Realme C35	Nokia G21	Samsung Galaxy A22 4G	Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S	Xiaomi Redmi Note 11	Average 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-50%	-2%	-62%	-56%	-29%	11%	-2%	136%
Sequential Read 256KB	524.39	309.8 -41%	907.1 73%	257.6 -51%	297.7 -43%	498.8 -5%	895.34 71%	770 ?(485 - 979, n=18) 47%	1847 ?(226 - 4512, n=193, last 2 years) 252%
Sequential Write 256KB	446.46	221.5 -50%	271.1 -39%	180.6 -60%	183 -59%	372 -17%	519.23 16%	399 ?(120.6 - 519, n=18) -11%	1436 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=193, last 2 years) 222%
Random Read 4KB	214.82	84 -61%	137.8 -36%	74 -66%	101.2 -53%	110.5 -49%	172.95 -19%	156.6 ?(88.5 - 220, n=18) -27%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=193, last 2 years) 29%
Random Write 4KB	216.24	109.8 -49%	206.4 -5%	60.2 -72%	66.9 -69%	121 -44%	163.29 -24%	177.7 ?(95.4 - 216, n=18) -18%	308 ?(9.4 - 753, n=193, last 2 years) 42%

游戏--可实现流畅的游戏体验

芯片ARM Mali-G57 MC2Redmi Note 11S中使用的图形单元能够流畅地显示游戏，只要图形细节不设置得太高。例如，在《PUBG》移动版中，在高清/高的设置下，可以实现30FPS的恒定。在图形较简单的游戏中，如Armajet和Subway Surfers，帧率甚至在60FPS左右。然而，Armajet的不同帧率也表明，SoC在这里已经达到了它的性能极限。

我们用我们的Gamebench来测量游戏的帧率。测试工具测量游戏的帧率。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø58.3 (51-61)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S; PUBG Mobile; 2.1.0: Ø29.9 (27-31)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S; Subway Surfers; 2.38.0: Ø59.7 (53-61)

排放 - 始终保持低温运行

温度

当运行时，Redmi Note 11S从未超过手部温度。经过一个小时的持续压力测试，我们测量到小米智能手机表面的最高温度只有36.3℃（97.3°F）。它几乎在任何时候都能使用其全部SoC性能。我们在3DMark Wild Life压力测试中测得的性能下降是如此之小，以至于没有意义。

Max. Load

Idle


36.3 °C	35.6 °C	32.6 °C
35.7 °C	34.7 °C	33.8 °C
33.9 °C	32.6 °C	32.3 °C

Maximum: 36.3 °C
Average: 34.2 °C


31.9 °C	34.4 °C	36.1 °C
32.4 °C	32.6 °C	35.2 °C
32.4 °C	33.8 °C	34.7 °C

Maximum: 36.1 °C
Average: 33.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 27.8 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Motorola Moto G31 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash	99.3 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash	99.2 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.1 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.2 %
Motorola Moto G31 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash	98.9 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash	97.9 % -1%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø1.969 (1.96-1.976)

Motorola Moto G31 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.7.2: Ø1.091 (1.086-1.099)

Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.4.2: Ø1.052 (1.037-1.059)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø6.96 (6.93-7)

Motorola Moto G31 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.33 (4.31-4.34)

Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.15 (4.13-4.17)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.68 (2.66-2.69)

发言人

Redmi Note 11S的设备包括立体声扬声器，这在高达200欧元（约199美元）的价格范围内是个例外。作为典型的智能手机，双扬声器听起来相当薄，但仍能相当好地再现声音。然而，低音是罕见的。另一方面，音频端口听起来很干净，没有噪音，信噪比达到了93dBFS。

你可以使用3.5毫米音频端口或蓝牙5.0连接外部音频设备与Redmi Note 11S。通常的蓝牙音频编解码器，如AAC、SBC、LDHC、aptX、aptX HD和aptX Adaptive都受到支持。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 稳固但不突出

消耗功率

小米智能手机可以使用附带的33瓦特充电器快速充电。在我们的测试中，将5000毫安时的电池从0充到80%需要37分钟。然后，电池在52分钟后被完全充满。

有趣的是，充电的速度几乎没有小米Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G兄弟机型的充电速度为51分钟，尽管该智能手机使用67瓦的充电器。虽然Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G在开始时充电较快，但随后充电曲线下降得相当快，最后几乎达到相同的充电时间。

Redmi Note 11S的耗电量并不显眼。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.04 / 0.18 Watt
Idle	0.89 / 1.87 / 1.9 Watt
Load	3.01 / 6.26 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5000 mAh	Motorola Moto G31 5000 mAh	Realme C35 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A22 4G 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 5000 mAh	Average Mediatek Helio G96	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		11%	19%	-17%	11%	4%	-9%	-27%
Idle Minimum *	0.89	0.7 21%	0.8 10%	1.5 -69%	0.69 22%	1.06 -19%	0.945 ?(0.89 - 1, n=2) -6%	0.893 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=154, last 2 years) -0%
Idle Average *	1.87	0.9 52%	1.1 41%	2.1 -12%	1.46 22%	1.93 -3%	1.585 ?(1.3 - 1.87, n=2) 15%	1.449 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=154, last 2 years) 23%
Idle Maximum *	1.9	1.3 32%	1.4 26%	2.5 -32%	1.5 21%	1.96 -3%	1.7 ?(1.5 - 1.9, n=2) 11%	1.608 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=154, last 2 years) 15%
Load Average *	3.01	3.5 -16%	3.1 -3%	2.9 4%	3.67 -22%	2.87 5%	4.41 ?(3.01 - 5.8, n=2) -47%	6.5 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=149, last 2 years) -116%
Load Maximum *	6.26	8.5 -36%	5.1 19%	4.9 22%	5.58 11%	3.85 38%	7.43 ?(6.26 - 8.6, n=2) -19%	9.87 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=149, last 2 years) -58%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mediatek Helio G96: Ø3.86 (1.049-8.74)

Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80: Ø3.8 (0.967-7.64)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G: Ø3.03 (1.109-6.23)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mediatek Helio G96; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.24 (2.98-3.62)

Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.91 (2.32-5.27)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.88 (2.54-5.23)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S Mediatek Helio G96; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.144 (1.097-1.297)

Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.15 (1.9-2.49)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.302 (1.117-1.614)

电池寿命

其5000毫安时的电池为Redmi Note 11S的良好电池寿命做出了贡献。在我们的模拟网络冲浪中，这款智能手机可以持续12小时左右，而在播放视频时，略微超过16小时。然而，在电池容量相同的情况下，所有的对比设备的持续时间仍然明显更长，特别是包括Redmi Note 10S前身。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		27h 43min
WiFi Websurfing		12h 05min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		16h 11min
Load (maximum brightness)		6h 16min

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5000 mAh	Motorola Moto G31 5000 mAh	Realme C35 5000 mAh	Nokia G21 5050 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A22 4G 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 5000 mAh
Battery Runtime		16%	32%	50%	40%	47%	16%
Reader / Idle	1663	2140 29%			2867 72%	3612 117%	2098 26%
H.264	971	1294 33%			1297 34%	1172 21%	1076 11%
WiFi v1.3	725	1032 42%	958 32%	1087 50%	1252 73%	1087 50%	842 16%
Load	376	226 -40%			299 -20%	368 -2%	409 9%

Pros

+ 90-Hz AMOLED显示屏

+ 准确的GPS

+ 良好的指纹识别传感器

+ 立体声扬声器

+ 双SIM卡+microSD

+ 可靠的电池寿命和快速充电

Cons

- 部分内容比前代产品差

- 没有IP认证

- 没有全功能的永远在线显示屏

- 视频录制只有1080p

对小米Redmi Note 11S的评判

测试小米Redmi Note 11S。测试装置由NBB.com（notebooksbilliger.de）提供。

通过Redmi Note 11S，小米提供了一个良好的中低端智能手机。以200欧元（约199美元）的官方价格，那些可以不使用5G的人将得到一部做工良好、日常操作性能稳定的智能手机。该联发科Helio G96和6GB的内存确保大多数应用程序的运行没有任何问题，延迟成为例外。

以200欧元的价格，小米Redmi Note 11S提供了很多物美价廉的智能手机，包括一个90赫兹的AMOLED屏幕。然而，在某些方面，它比它的前辈更差。

小米智能手机的AMOLED屏幕变得特别有趣，它以90赫兹的刷新率确保了吸引人的流畅操作。除显示屏外，Redmi Note 11S还拥有立体声扬声器、不错的电池寿命和108万像素的摄像头，在最佳光线条件下能成功拍摄出好照片。33瓦的充电器可以快速为智能手机充电。

Redmi Note 11S几乎没有区别于其Redmi Note 10S 前身，除了提供更多最新版本的Android 和支持DRM Widevine L1外，几乎没有任何优势。此外，我们的测试设备在某些方面也没有任何改进：由于改用了联发科Helio G96，图形性能更弱，而且现在不支持4K，只支持全高清视频录制。电池寿命也变差了，而且IP53认证被取消了。因此，从上一代产品升级是不值得的。

小米Redmi Note 11S的替代品是，例如诺基亚G21和三星Galaxy A22 4G这两款手机价格更实惠，性能和设备相似，也提供90Hz的屏幕。然而，只有三星还包括一个AMOLED屏幕。

价格和可用性

在我们测试的时候，128GB版本的Redmi Note 11S，例如从亚马逊购买，价格为246美元。小米公司的网店也列出了这款智能手机，但没有提供任何在美国的购买选项。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S - 09/01/2022 v7 ^(old)
Manuel Masiero

Chassis

81%

Keyboard

69 / 75 → 92%

Pointing Device

88%

Connectivity

50 / 70 → 71%

Weight

90%

Battery

90%

Display

90%

Games Performance

25 / 64 → 40%

Application Performance

66 / 86 → 76%

Temperature

92%

Noise

100%

Audio

71 / 90 → 78%

Camera

58%

Average

75%

80%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 534 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 460014 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 小米Redmi Note 11S智能手机评测--90Hz AMOLED和108MP摄像头，售价200欧元（约199美元）。

Manuel Masiero, 2022-09- 5 (Update: 2024-08-15)

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳 - 一个没有IP认证的轻型塑料外壳

尺寸比较

设备 - 具有10秒限制的始终开启功能

微型SD卡读卡器

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

软件 - MIUI 13和升级到Android 12

通信和GNSS - 4G，稳定的Wi-Fi 5，以及精确的GPS

电话功能和语音质量

摄像头 - 四个摄像头，108MP

配件和保修 - 33瓦的充电器和保护罩

输入设备和操作 - 响应式显示

显示屏 - AMOLED面板，90赫兹

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - 与前代产品相比，几乎没有任何改进

游戏--可实现流畅的游戏体验

排放 - 始终保持低温运行

温度

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

发言人

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S audio analysis

Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S audio analysis

电池寿命 - 稳固但不突出

消耗功率

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

对小米Redmi Note 11S的评判

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Price comparison