Notebookcheck Logo
Review: Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE

小米Redmi Note 14 LTE 智能手机评测--更强的动力和耐力

经济实惠的马拉松选手

小米正在推出整个 Note 14 系列。据说最便宜的Redmi Note 14 的 AI 摄像头和大容量电池会给人留下深刻印象。它还配备了 120 Hz AMOLED 显示屏、立体声扬声器、内存扩展和音频插孔连接器--而所有这些只需 200 美元。我们的评测将揭示它是否还有不足之处。
Benedikt Winkel, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Redmi Note 14 LTE 评价 - 整体性强,但缺乏亮点

小米在Redmi Note 14 LTE 上做了很多正确的事情。这款智能手机的性能比上一代产品更好,AMOLED 显示屏明亮且色彩准确。此外,它还配备了红外爆破器、音频插孔连接器和可扩展存储空间。不过,它的最大亮点是非常出色的电池续航能力。

尽管如此,相机还是让我们喜忧参半。在光线充足的条件下,主摄像头的拍摄效果尚可。而低光性能、变焦和视频质量则相当一般。前置摄像头拍摄的图像也没有达到预期效果。

在测试过程中,Wi-Fi 连接的短暂中断令人恼火,但希望通过更新可以解决这个问题。我们还希望看到更清晰的振动电机、更高质量的音频插孔连接器和真正的全时显示屏。

Pros

+ 可扩展存储空间
+ 3.5 毫米音频插孔
+ 超长电池寿命
+ 附带许多额外功能
+ 明亮、色彩准确的 AMOLED 显示屏

Cons

- 低功率储备
- 视频质量
- Wi-Fi 下降

价格和供应情况

小米Redmi Note 14 LTE 最小版本的零售价为 200 美元,但额外的 2 GB 内存会让你多花 30 美元。最大版本配备 8GB 内存和 256GB 存储空间,售价约为 250 美元。

不过,在撰写这篇评论时,商店里的价格已经低于建议零售价。

可能的替代品比较

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
73.4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘
ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $287.50
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G ...
2. $6.95
Mr.Shield Screen Protector c...
3. $334.99
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G ...
List Price: 250€
196 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"
2400x1080
395 PPI
AMOLED
2.
81.5% v7 (old)
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘
ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon: $184.89
List Price: 299€
181 g512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"
2400x1080
395 PPI
AMOLED
3.
80% v7 (old)
Samsung Galaxy A15
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘
ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘
4 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $5.95
Mr.Shield Screen Protector c...
2. $3.99
LYWHL for 3 Pack Samsung Gal...
3. $6.99
Supershieldz (2 Pack) Design...
List Price: 190€
200 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.50"
2340x1080
396 PPI
Super AMOLED
4.
72.3%
Motorola Moto G35
Motorola Moto G35
Unisoc T8100 (T760) ⎘
ARM Mali-G57 MP4 ⎘
4 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $3.47
Mr.Shield Screen Protector c...
2. $9.99
Fast Charger Type C 25W USB ...
3. $8.99
30W Fast Charger Block 2 Por...
List Price: 179€
188 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.72"
2400x1080
392 PPI
IPS
5.
80.2% v7 (old)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 610 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $287.50
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G ...
2. $334.99
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G ...
3. $225.00
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G ...
List Price: 199€
188.5 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"
2400x1080
395 PPI
AMOLED

凭借红米 14,小米不仅推出了一款智能手机,而且还推出了一个完整的系列。除了 Note 14,还有 Note 14 Pro 和 Note 14 Pro+。Note 14 和 Note 14 Pro 还有 5G 和 LTE 版本。

这次评测的是入门级机型Redmi Note 14 LTE。这款手机有不同规格的版本。基本款智能手机配备 6 GB 内存和 128 GB 存储空间。此外,还有 8 GB 内存和 128 或 256 GB 存储空间可供选择。

有三种颜色可供选择:青柠绿、午夜黑和海洋蓝。我们的评测机型为黑色,拥有最大的存储配置。

规格

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE (Redmi Note 14 Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio G99 8 x 2 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR4x
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB 
, 229 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity sensor, Accelerometer, Electronic compass, Gyroscope, IR-Blaster, OTG
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850/900/1800/1900MHz), 3G (Band 1/ 5/ 8), 4G (Band 1/ 3/ 5/ 7/ 8/ 20/ 28/ 38/ 40/ 41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.16 x 164.84 x 78.15
Battery
5500 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 108 MPix f/1,7, 1/1,67" Sensorsize; 2 MPix macro; 2 MPix depth
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix f/2,2, 1/4" Sensorsize
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: onscreen, USB-C-Cable, power suply unit, HyperOS 1.0, 12 Months Warranty, IP54, GNSS: GPS (L1), Galileo (E1); Glonass (G1); BDS (B1); Camera2API: Level 3; IP54; Bluetooth-Codescs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, LDAC, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, LHDC V1/V2/V3/V4/V5.; SNR 77,25 dBFS; HDR10; SAR-Head: 0.99 W/kg, SAR-Body: 0.97 W/kg, fanless
Weight
196 g, Power Supply: 106 g
Price
250 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳 -Redmi Note 14 附带 IP 认证

红米 Note 14 采用塑料背壳,边框由铝合金制成。显示屏由康宁大猩猩 5 号玻璃保护。甚至还通过了 IP 认证,尽管只有 IP54。

制造质量令人印象深刻:缝隙小而均匀,智能手机不仅坚固,而且即使受力也很难弯曲。边框和机身背面均为磨砂处理,相对不易沾染指纹。只有三个镜头周围的玻璃状元件是真正的灰尘磁铁。

尺寸比较

166.3 mm 76 mm 7.8 mm 188 g164.84 mm 78.15 mm 8.16 mm 196 g162.2 mm 75.6 mm 8 mm 188.5 g161.1 mm 74.95 mm 7.98 mm 181 g160.1 mm 76.8 mm 8.4 mm 200 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

功能 - Redmi 提供音频插孔和 microSD

小米公司宣传Redmi Note 14 配备 108 万像素摄像头、5500 毫安时电池和 120 赫兹刷新率。这款智能手机还提供 3.5 毫米音频插孔、NFC、红外爆破器和通过混合插槽中的 microSD 卡扩展内存等功能。

USB-C 端口仅支持 USB 2.0,但支持 exFAT 和 NTFS 作为外部数据存储设备的文件系统。在我们的测试中,当与三星 980 Pro 固态硬盘搭配使用时,我们测得的传输速度为 24.7 MB/s。

microSD 读卡器 - Redmi 最高可扩展至 1 TB

Redmi Note 14 的内部存储空间可以使用 microSD 卡进行扩展。红米 14 最高可容纳 1 TB 的存储卡,在测试中,我们使用 AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60 作为参考卡。

通过三次测量,我们获得了 24.7 MB/s 的平均传输速度。这使得 Note 14 与前代产品不相上下。三星Galaxy A15 的传输速度几乎是前者的两倍,证明了在这个级别的产品中,你可以获得更快的速度。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99 (Angelbird V60)
42.6 MB/s +72%
Motorola Moto G35
Unisoc T8100 (T760) (Angelbird V60)
36.4 MB/s +47%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.7 - 77, n=77, last 2 years)
30.1 MB/s +22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G99 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
24.7 MB/s
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G (Angelbird V60)
24.3 MB/s -2%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
22.1 MB/s -11%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø37.4 (26.8-49.4)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø26.5 (17.2-40)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø73.6 (47.7-81.6)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76 (18.4-82.5)

软件 - HyperOS 位于Redmi Note 14

Redmi Note 14 预装了Android 14 和小米 HyperOS 1.0。在审查时,安全补丁是从 2024 年 11 月开始的。Note 14 系列没有统一的更新政策。令人惊讶的是,最便宜的Redmi Note 14 获得的支持时间最长:Redmi Note 14 将获得四年的操作系统更新和六年的安全更新。

HyperOS 提供多种设置选项。不过,该设备也附带了大量的臃肿软件。除了大量的小米和谷歌应用程序外,还有来自微软、游戏供应商和第三方供应商(如 TikToc、Facebook、阿里巴巴、Booking 等)的软件。除小米应用程序外,所有程序都可以轻松删除。

可持续性 -Redmi Note 14 具有较长的搁置寿命

小米尚未提供有关Redmi Note 14 碳足迹的任何信息。该设备的包装很少使用塑料,制造商宣传说这款智能手机特别耐用。小米希望通过坚固的结构、吸水泡沫元件和加固边角等材料来实现这一目标。

小米承诺其电池寿命长达 4 年,据说这是通过智能充电管理实现的。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - Note 14 出现小幅中断

小米Redmi Note 14 仅支持 Wi-Fi 5。在我们的测试中,当与我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 配对时,它的传输速度达到了同类产品的典型水平。

在记录的测量中,传输稳定,没有出现掉线现象。但在日常使用中,我们发现Redmi Note 14 经常会在几秒钟内失去 Wi-Fi 连接,而其他设备却能保持网络连接。

说到移动数据,该设备的表现并不突出,但在我们的测试中,它的传输很稳定。Note 14 系列中最便宜的机型不支持 5G。此外,频段覆盖率相对较低,但支持所有欧洲相关频段。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (49.8 - 1801, n=183, last 2 years)
711 MBit/s +94%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
367 (185min - 378max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
364 (336min - 382max) MBit/s -1%
Samsung Galaxy A15
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
364 (352min - 375max) MBit/s -1%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
357 (59min - 385max) MBit/s -3%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
  (10.5 - 718, n=194)
350 MBit/s -5%
Motorola Moto G35
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
304 (268min - 311max) MBit/s -17%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (52 - 1857, n=181, last 2 years)
694 MBit/s +82%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
390 (366min - 387max) MBit/s +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
382 (365min - 387max) MBit/s
Motorola Moto G35
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
331 (302min - 349max) MBit/s -13%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
  (20.1 - 695, n=193)
329 MBit/s -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
317 (293min - 339max) MBit/s -17%
Samsung Galaxy A15
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
285 (259min - 304max) MBit/s -25%
050100150200250300350Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø361 (185-378)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø364 (336-382)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø375 (365-387)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø316 (293-339)
全球导航卫星系统测量:户外
全球导航卫星系统测量:户外
全球导航卫星系统测量:室内
全球导航卫星系统测量:室内

Redmi Note 14 支持单频 GNSS 连接。在室内,智能手机需要几秒钟才能建立连接。在室外,卫星连接速度更快,定位也更精确。

在与 Garmin Venu 2 智能手表的对比中,我们可以清楚地看到Redmi Note 14 的定位并不十分精确。在这次对比中,小米设备的测量距离短了约 200 米。路线显示经常不正确。在日常生活中,例如使用谷歌地图,Note 14 的导航还是很简单的。

全球导航卫星系统测量:池塘
全球导航卫星系统测量:池塘
全球导航卫星系统测量:路径
全球导航卫星系统测量:路径
全球导航卫星系统测量:摘要
全球导航卫星系统测量:摘要

电话功能和语音质量 -Redmi Note 14 的声音有些刺耳

小米Redmi Note 14 使用谷歌电话应用程序。软件界面简洁,不会给用户带来任何困惑。通话质量还不错,但听筒让对方的声音听起来有点刺耳。背景噪音也可以抑制得更好,但没有干扰。

通过扬声器通话时,设备的声音足够大。

摄像头 - 视频不是Redmi Note 14 的强项之一

与Redmi Note 14 自拍
与Redmi Note 14 自拍

虽然小米在Redmi Note 14 中安装了三个镜头,但真正值得重视的只有 10800 万像素的主摄像头。另外两个镜头各有 200 万像素,一个用于微距拍摄,另一个提供景深信息。微距拍摄的噪点很高,只有在光线条件非常好的情况下才能使用。没有超广角镜头,只能进行数字变焦。

另一方面,主摄像头的质量大多令人印象深刻。照片清晰度高,处理速度快。不过,相比之下,色彩就显得比较暗淡了。数码变焦还不错,但动态范围继续缩小,拍摄对象也有些模糊。如果需要,可以全分辨率拍摄照片。此外,还有一个专业模式,可以手动设置白平衡、对焦、曝光时间和 ISO。

2000 万像素前置摄像头拍摄的照片不够清晰。图像有时会显得柔和、暗淡。不过,人像模式运行稳定。Redmi Note 14 可录制最高分辨率为 1080p 和 60fps 的视频,而前置摄像头只能录制 30fps 的视频。

视频质量一般,而且由于缺乏防抖功能,需要稳定的手。曝光校正和自动对焦效果不错。不过,在我们的测试中,即使是短视频也会出现图像错误和录制卡顿。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

RabbitPond5x ZoomLow light
ColorChecker
9.7 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
4 ∆E
4 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE: 7.86 ∆E min: 3.73 - max: 16.17 ∆E
ColorChecker
30 ∆E
55.1 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
45.2 ∆E
62 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
43.6 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
31.9 ∆E
47.1 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
76.6 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
41.9 ∆E
93.7 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE: 47.1 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 93.71 ∆E

附件和保修 -Redmi Note 14 附带一个保护套和电源适配器

幸运的是,开箱后,Redmi Note 14 附带了一个贴好的屏幕保护膜。此外,还附带了一个保护套和一个 33 瓦充电器。在德国,小米公司为Redmi Note 14 提供 12 个月的保修服务。

凡是在 2025 年 2 月 11 日之前购买该智能手机的用户,在购买后的前 6 个月内,还将获得小米公司提供的免费维修或更换有缺陷的显示屏服务,即使是手机所有者的过错也不例外。

输入设备和操作 - 使用Redmi Note 14 快速解锁

Redmi Note 14 的显示屏是平面的,这意味着使用的屏幕保护膜不会干扰显示屏边缘的输入,而且在测试期间也不会脱落。在显示屏的所有区域都能可靠地识别输入。

开箱后,小米手机使用 Gboard 作为键盘。这意味着,在我们的测试中,输入是可靠的。只有 ERM 振动电机在一定程度上破坏了输入体验。它的工作原理和声音都很清晰,但触觉反馈却很松散。

解锁功能给人留下了积极的印象。Redmi Note 14 可以使用 2D 面部识别或显示屏内指纹识别器解锁。两种方式都能快速可靠地工作。不过,指纹识别器安装在显示屏上的位置太低。

显示屏 - 120 Hz,采用 AMOLED 显示屏Redmi Note 14

子像素图像
子像素图像

Redmi Note 14 采用 6.67 英寸 AMOLED 面板。最高刷新率为 120 Hz。软件会在工作前进行自动调整。如果需要,也可以将该值设置为 60 或 120 Hz。根据 DRM 信息,只有 90 Hz 的中间档。

在测试中,我们测得在环境光传感器激活时的最大亮度为 1,176 cd/m²。这使得面板亮度略高于前代产品。与同类设备相比,Redmi Note 14 表现不俗。此外,显示屏发光均匀。通过 HDR 测量,我们达到了承诺的 1,800 cd/m² 亮度(APL18:1,734 cd/m²)。

在没有环境光传感器的情况下,我们测得的亮度为 470 尼特。在测量过程中,我们还发现屏幕以两种不同的频率闪烁,一种是 OLED 闪烁,另一种是 PWM 闪烁,但频率高达 980 Hz。

在小米Redmi Note 14 的设置中,有一个 "始终显示 "选项。不过,这并不是真正的 "始终显示"。显示屏可以自定义,但在几分钟不活动后就会关闭。

1172
cd/m²
1161
cd/m²
1176
cd/m²
1169
cd/m²
1164
cd/m²
1173
cd/m²
1173
cd/m²
1159
cd/m²
1170
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1176 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1168.6 cd/m² Minimum: 2.81 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 1164 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.89
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Samsung Galaxy A15
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.5"
Motorola Moto G35
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Screen
1%
-39%
-81%
-6%
Brightness middle
1164
1016
-13%
731
-37%
1069
-8%
940
-19%
Brightness
1169
1016
-13%
711
-39%
976
-17%
922
-21%
Brightness Distribution
99
94
-5%
93
-6%
88
-11%
96
-3%
Black Level *
0.7
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.3
1.1
15%
2.31
-78%
3.32
-155%
1.2
8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.5
1.9
24%
3.51
-40%
5.48
-119%
2.28
9%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.3
1.3
-0%
1.7
-31%
3.6
-177%
1.4
-8%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2.28 96%
2.091 105%
2.167 102%
2.27 97%
CCT
6531 100%
6420 101%
6424 101%
6141 106%
6503 100%
Contrast
1527

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz
Amplitude: 14.71 %
Secondary Frequency: 980 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8619 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

以固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置进行的一系列测量(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平,但这是缩放造成的。最小亮度下的振幅放大图可在信息框中查看)。

Note 14 显示屏的色彩平衡实现得很好。此外,在 Calman 2D 测量中,这款智能手机的 sRGB 色彩空间覆盖率达到 99.9%。显示屏的色彩还原可以在设置中进行自定义。

色彩精度(色彩方案标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB)
色彩精度(色彩方案标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB)
色彩空间(色彩方案标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB)
色彩空间(色彩方案标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB)
灰度(色彩方案标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB)
灰度(色彩方案标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB)
色彩饱和度(标准配色方案、标准色温、目标色彩空间 sRGB)
色彩饱和度(标准配色方案、标准色温、目标色彩空间 sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.782 ms rise
↘ 0.6875 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.98 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.032 ms rise
↘ 0.9475 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.7 ms).

在日常情况下,即使在阳光下也能阅读内容,不过最好能有额外的亮度储备。内容可能难以辨认,尤其是在较宽的视角下。

Redmi Note 14 的 AMOLED 显示屏具有稳定的可视角度。虽然从侧面看亮度会降低,但内容仍然清晰可见,颜色也不会改变。

性能 -Redmi Note 14 属于平均水平

小米Redmi Note 14 不再使用 Snapdragon CPU,而是采用了 联发科 Helio G99.正如基准测试结果所显示的,这比 骁龙 685 4G中的 Redmi Note 13.

该芯片可能并不新鲜,但它也安装在该细分市场的其他设备上,如 Poco M6 Pro三星Galaxy A15这两款产品都已上市一段时间了。正如您所期望的那样,这些设备的性能彼此相似。

在日常使用中,Redmi Note 14 通常都能流畅运行。但是,在运行要求较高的应用程序或同时运行多项任务时,就会出现卡顿现象。

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3479, n=185, last 2 years)
1490 Points +111%
Motorola Moto G35
Unisoc T8100 (T760), Mali-G57 MP4, 4096
738 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
730 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
728 Points +3%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (705 - 738, n=12)
726 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
705 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
478 Points -32%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 10401, n=185, last 2 years)
4207 Points +116%
Motorola Moto G35
Unisoc T8100 (T760), Mali-G57 MP4, 4096
2168 Points +11%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
1994 Points +2%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (1864 - 2065, n=12)
1984 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1946 Points
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1942 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
1544 Points -21%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (139 - 2437, n=167, last 2 years)
1053 Points +94%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
552 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
551 Points +1%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (490 - 576, n=18)
547 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
544 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
437 Points -20%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 8816, n=167, last 2 years)
3532 Points +94%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
1903 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1879 Points +3%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (1670 - 1981, n=18)
1828 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1818 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
1775 Points -2%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=121, last 2 years)
1289811 Points +205%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
422936 Points
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
421861 Points 0%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (383511 - 422936, n=6)
404332 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
391170 Points -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
352825 Points -17%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 27169, n=191, last 2 years)
13514 Points +28%
Motorola Moto G35
Unisoc T8100 (T760), Mali-G57 MP4, 4096
12187 Points +15%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
10603 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
10563 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (8885 - 11379, n=18)
9931 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
9195 Points -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
7305 Points -31%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2674, n=163, last 2 years)
941 Points +65%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
570 Points
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
568 Points 0%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (526 - 602, n=11)
565 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
526 Points -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
369 Points -35%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 13729, n=157, last 2 years)
6521 Points +122%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3076 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
3041 Points +3%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (2855 - 3120, n=11)
3000 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2941 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
2728 Points -7%
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 19891, n=157, last 2 years)
10336 Points +66%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
6743 Points +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
6320 Points +2%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (5261 - 6776, n=11)
6228 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
6208 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
6208 Points
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 18911, n=157, last 2 years)
7118 Points +104%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (3454 - 4152, n=11)
3739 Points +7%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
3732 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3636 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3493 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
3285 Points -6%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=157, last 2 years)
18246 Points +539%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
2959 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2856 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (2683 - 3002, n=11)
2804 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2798 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
2331 Points -18%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=157, last 2 years)
1583 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1306 Points +8%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (1150 - 1325, n=11)
1248 Points +3%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
1247 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1208 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
1144 Points -5%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=148, last 2 years)
17659 Points +92%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
9197 Points
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
9164 Points 0%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (6323 - 9695, n=10)
8646 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
6323 Points -31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
4615 Points -50%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=139, last 2 years)
25733 Points +2956%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
920 Points +9%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (842 - 982, n=9)
901 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
842 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
382 Points -55%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 4619, n=45, last 2 years)
764 Points
Motorola Moto G35
Unisoc T8100 (T760), Mali-G57 MP4, 4096
366 Points
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 32432, n=45, last 2 years)
3546 Points
Motorola Moto G35
Unisoc T8100 (T760), Mali-G57 MP4, 4096
358 Points
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Average of class Smartphone
  (118 - 44657, n=45, last 2 years)
5123 Points
Motorola Moto G35
Unisoc T8100 (T760), Mali-G57 MP4, 4096
145 Points
AI Benchmark - Score V6
Average of class Smartphone
  (68.9 - 10957, n=29, last 2 years)
3355 Points +4769%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
68.9 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  ()
68.9 Points 0%

Redmi Note 14 的图形芯片,小米采用了 Mali-G57 MP2与 Poco M6 Pro 使用的是同一款芯片。 Poco M6 Pro三星Galaxy A15 4G.不出所料,基准测试的结果非常相似。不过 摩托罗拉 Moto G35Mali-G57 MP4.

其图形性能足以在高清环境下流畅地玩《PUBG Mobile》等要求苛刻的游戏。

在浏览器基准测试和内存测量方面也没有任何惊喜。Redmi Note 14 的成绩属于同类产品的典型水平,比上一代产品略胜一筹。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Motorola Moto G35
Mali-G57 MP4, T8100 (T760), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
434 Points +31%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
335 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
332 Points
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
326 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
135 Points -59%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Motorola Moto G35
Mali-G57 MP4, T8100 (T760), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
443 Points +28%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
345 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
345 Points
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
332 Points -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
139 Points -60%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Motorola Moto G35
Mali-G57 MP4, T8100 (T760), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1599 Points +33%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1221 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1202 Points
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1094 Points -9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
634 Points -47%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Motorola Moto G35
Mali-G57 MP4, T8100 (T760), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1614 Points +31%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1233 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1230 Points
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1195 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
645 Points -48%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
132.5 (0.982min - 0.982max) Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
132 Points 0%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
132 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Motorola Moto G35
Mali-G57 MP4, T8100 (T760), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4186 Points +20%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3652 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3501 Points
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3329 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2739 Points -22%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Motorola Moto G35
Mali-G57 MP4, T8100 (T760), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3016 Points +24%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2440 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2434 Points
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2411 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1427 Points -41%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Motorola Moto G35
Mali-G57 MP4, T8100 (T760), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3216 Points +23%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2634 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2611 Points
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2568 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1597 Points -39%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
56 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
56 fps +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
55 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps -27%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
63 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
63 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
63 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
45 fps -29%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
37 fps +3%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
36 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
36 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps -39%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps -40%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps -44%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps -36%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.7 fps -41%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.8 fps -45%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Motorola Moto G35
Mali-G57 MP4, T8100 (T760), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps +31%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.9 fps +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.4 fps
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.3 fps -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.5 fps -35%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Moto G35
Mali-G57 MP4, T8100 (T760), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.6 fps +38%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.9 fps +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.5 fps
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.4 fps -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.6 fps -35%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Motorola Moto G35
Mali-G57 MP4, T8100 (T760), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps +50%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps +17%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.5 fps -21%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Motorola Moto G35
Mali-G57 MP4, T8100 (T760), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps +43%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps +14%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
10 fps -29%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Moto G35
Mali-G57 MP4, T8100 (T760), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.3 fps +38%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.5 fps +4%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.4 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.4 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1.5 fps -37%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (111.1 - 387, n=168, last 2 years)
128.2 Points +65%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE (chrome 132)
77.9 Points
Samsung Galaxy A15 (Chrome 122)
74.154 Points -5%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro (chrome 122)
73.5 Points -6%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (46.9 - 80.9, n=10)
67.6 Points -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Chrome 120)
62.375 Points -20%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=149, last 2 years)
153.5 runs/min +94%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE (chrome 132)
79.3 runs/min
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro (chrome 122)
65.46 runs/min -17%
Samsung Galaxy A15 (Chrome 122)
60.4 runs/min -24%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (24.1 - 80.7, n=10)
55.2 runs/min -30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Chrome 120)
52.4 runs/min -34%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=157, last 2 years)
121.1 Points +46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE (Chrome 132)
83 Points
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro (Chrome 122)
81 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A15 (Chrome 122)
78 Points -6%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (39 - 89, n=10)
70.9 Points -15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Chrome 120)
49 Points -41%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=205, last 2 years)
40272 Points +69%
Motorola Moto G35 (Chrome 128)
25440 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE (chrome 132)
23896 Points
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro (chrome 122)
22678 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A15 (Chrome 122)
21890 Points -8%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (17228 - 25005, n=18)
21160 Points -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Chrome 120)
15900 Points -33%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Chrome 120)
2534.6 ms * -45%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1671 - 2444, n=10)
2026 ms * -16%
Samsung Galaxy A15 (Chrome 122)
2009.6 ms * -15%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro (chrome 122)
1932.3 ms * -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE (chrome 132)
1742.5 ms *
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=165, last 2 years)
1486 ms * +15%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTEXiaomi Poco M6 ProSamsung Galaxy A15Motorola Moto G35Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4GAverage 256 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
8%
-5%
22%
-10%
1%
68%
Sequential Read 256KB
980.55
973.53
-1%
967.8
-1%
989.3
1%
909.8
-7%
Sequential Write 256KB
835.49
910.9
9%
488.5
-42%
860.3
3%
606.3
-27%
719 ?(369 - 913, n=38)
-14%
Random Read 4KB
202.22
236.72
17%
233.2
15%
272.1
35%
177.1
-12%
Random Write 4KB
213.23
228.61
7%
229.6
8%
318.9
50%
228
7%

排放--Note 14 声音很大,但保持冷静

温度 - Note 14 并非头脑发热

在日常生活中,Redmi Note 14 的温度始终很低。即使在玩游戏时,设备也几乎不会发热。在极端负载情况下,即在 "Burnout "基准测试中,设备上部的最高温度为 38.2 摄氏度。

Max. Load
 38.2 °C36.1 °C32.9 °C 
 37.2 °C36.2 °C32.5 °C 
 35.9 °C34.6 °C32 °C 
Maximum: 38.2 °C
Average: 35.1 °C
32.4 °C34.2 °C33.9 °C
31.2 °C33.2 °C34.4 °C
29.8 °C33.9 °C34.3 °C
Maximum: 34.4 °C
Average: 33 °C
Power Supply (max.)  29.4 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 %
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.1 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99 % 0%
Motorola Moto G35
Mali-G57 MP4, T8100 (T760), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.1 % -1%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.3 % +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.7 % +2%
Motorola Moto G35
Mali-G57 MP4, T8100 (T760), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
97.6 % +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
96.7 %
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
95.6 % -1%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
97.5 %
01234567Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.04 (2.01-2.08)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.814 (0.81-0.82)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.42 (7.39-7.44)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.91 (3.89-3.93)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø0.995 (0.979-1.004)

扬声器 - 红米扬声器明显优于前代产品

小米 Radmi Note 14 配有立体声扬声器,声音通过听筒向前方和手机顶部上方发出。即使开到最大音量,边框和后部也不会出现振动。

与前代产品相比,最大音量明显增大。中音也很好,很线性。不过,即使是智能手机,也完全缺乏低音和低频。小米Redmi Note 14 配备了 3.5 毫米音频接口。其信噪比为 77.25 dBFS,虽然还算不错,但并不理想。

在我们的测试中,这款智能手机可以轻松连接各种蓝牙耳机。支持以下标准:SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、LDAC、aptX Adaptive、aptX TWS+、LHDC V1/V2/V3/V4/V5。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203339.22527.536.73122.834.34026.337.15036.442.86321.1378020.735.110019.63512512.637.916016.342.520016.344.425013.150.131512.454.6400105650010.864.463012.467.780011.969.1100011.675.6125012.479.7160011.678.2200011.378.8250011.978.6315012.180.3400013.181.9500013.182.5630013.779.9800013.375.81000013.672.21250013.771.41600014.269.3SPL24.690.7N0.681.1median 12.6median 72.2Delta1.111.937.238.530.332.924.123.831.429.137.334.625.928.519.520.116.52713.731.113.736.29.2368.337.16.742.4749.18.854.88.358.18.964.610.765.78.767.19.164.99.765.710.661.811.353.21260.212.961.313.768.614.467.615.360.31657.91757.423.976.20.535.7median 10.7median 58.12.711.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTEXiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 -Redmi Note 14 持久耐用

耗电量

在Redmi Note 14 中,小米调整了 联发科 Helio G99Poco M6 Pro.在负载情况下,红米手机的功耗更低。Redmi Note 14 也比上一年的 Note 13 更经济。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.08 / 0.16 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.05 / 1.27 / 1.31 Watt
Load midlight 3.12 / 6.24 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
5500 mAh
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A15
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
5000 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio G99
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-21%
3%
-12%
-35%
-40%
Idle Minimum *
1.05
1
5%
1.1
-5%
1.1
-5%
1.038 ?(0.7 - 1.9, n=10)
1%
Idle Average *
1.27
1.19
6%
1.2
6%
1.3
-2%
1.852 ?(1.1 - 4.02, n=10)
-46%
Idle Maximum *
1.31
1.33
-2%
1.5
-15%
1.5
-15%
2.07 ?(1.31 - 4.07, n=10)
-58%
Load Average *
3.12
6.27
-101%
2.9
7%
3.6
-15%
4.91 ?(2.9 - 7.49, n=10)
-57%
Load Maximum *
6.24
7.19
-15%
4.8
23%
7.8
-25%
7.24 ?(4.8 - 10.2, n=10)
-16%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE Mediatek Helio G99; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø2.52 (1.164-4.6)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.73 (1.11-7.79)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE Mediatek Helio G99; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.976 (0.912-1.261)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.326 (1.144-3.09)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.50.70.91.21.41.71.92.12.42.62.83.13.33.53.844.34.5Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE Mediatek Helio G99; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.36 (2.17-2.76)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.36 (3.15-4.73)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE Mediatek Helio G99; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.976 (0.912-1.261)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.326 (1.144-3.09)

电池续航时间 -Redmi Note 14 是一款长距离跑步机

Redmi Note 14 将经济型处理器、AMOLED 显示屏和 5,500 毫安时大电池结合在一起。总的来说,我们取得了非常不错的续航时间。在我们进行的 Wi-Fi 上网冲浪实际测试中,Redmi Note 14 持续使用了超过 17.5 个小时才需要充电。

在日常生活中,使用两天不成问题。即使在玩游戏时,这款智能手机也能轻松使用一天而无需充电。使用随附的 33 瓦电源适配器,Redmi Note 14 可以在 35 分钟内从 10% 充电到 60%,在 60 分钟内从 10% 充电到 90%。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
17h 38min
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
5500 mAh
1058 min
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
5000 mAh
845 min
Samsung Galaxy A15
5000 mAh
885 min
Motorola Moto G35
5000 mAh
1001 min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
5000 mAh
742 min

Notebookcheck 总体评分

小米Redmi Note 14 性能不错,但在同类产品中并不算高。其性能比上一代产品更好,现在也具有竞争力。不过,Note 14 仍然算不上是一款高性能设备。红米智能手机没有犯任何错误,但除了电池续航时间外,它也缺乏一点亮点。

Redmi Note 14 的整体包装很协调。功能、做工和附带的额外功能都令人印象深刻,尤其是在价格方面。对于要求更高的用户,制造商还提供 Note 14 5G、Note 14 Pro、Note 14 Pro 5G 和 Note 14 Pro+ 5G。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE - 02/10/2025 v8
Benedikt Winkel

Chassis
86%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
88%
Connectivity
42 / 69 → 61%
Weight
88%
Battery
91%
Display
90%
Games Performance
5 / 55 → 9%
Application Performance
54 / 85 → 63%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
74 / 90 → 82%
Camera
57%
Average
60%
73%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
0%
Packaging
50%
Power Use
96.7%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
89%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 45.9%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 小米Redmi Note 14 LTE 智能手机评测--更强的动力和耐力
Benedikt Winkel, 2025-02-13 (Update: 2025-02-13)