data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9be3c/9be3cee5a6ee6ecc3499c6be6b91c719e12c1856" alt="Review: Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE"
小米Redmi Note 14 LTE 智能手机评测--更强的动力和耐力
经济实惠的马拉松选手
小米正在推出整个 Note 14 系列。据说最便宜的Redmi Note 14 的 AI 摄像头和大容量电池会给人留下深刻印象。它还配备了 120 Hz AMOLED 显示屏、立体声扬声器、内存扩展和音频插孔连接器--而所有这些只需 200 美元。我们的评测将揭示它是否还有不足之处。Benedikt Winkel, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Redmi Note 14 LTE 评价 - 整体性强,但缺乏亮点
小米在Redmi Note 14 LTE 上做了很多正确的事情。这款智能手机的性能比上一代产品更好,AMOLED 显示屏明亮且色彩准确。此外,它还配备了红外爆破器、音频插孔连接器和可扩展存储空间。不过,它的最大亮点是非常出色的电池续航能力。
尽管如此,相机还是让我们喜忧参半。在光线充足的条件下,主摄像头的拍摄效果尚可。而低光性能、变焦和视频质量则相当一般。前置摄像头拍摄的图像也没有达到预期效果。
在测试过程中,Wi-Fi 连接的短暂中断令人恼火,但希望通过更新可以解决这个问题。我们还希望看到更清晰的振动电机、更高质量的音频插孔连接器和真正的全时显示屏。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
小米Redmi Note 14 LTE 最小版本的零售价为 200 美元,但额外的 2 GB 内存会让你多花 30 美元。最大版本配备 8GB 内存和 256GB 存储空间,售价约为 250 美元。
不过,在撰写这篇评论时,商店里的价格已经低于建议零售价。
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $287.50 Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G ... 2. $6.95 Mr.Shield Screen Protector c... 3. $334.99 Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G ... List Price: 250€ | 196 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" 2400x1080 395 PPI AMOLED | |
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: $184.89 List Price: 299€ | 181 g | 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" 2400x1080 395 PPI AMOLED | |
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 4 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $5.95 Mr.Shield Screen Protector c... 2. $3.99 LYWHL for 3 Pack Samsung Gal... 3. $6.99 Supershieldz (2 Pack) Design... List Price: 190€ | 200 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.50" 2340x1080 396 PPI Super AMOLED | |
Motorola Moto G35 Unisoc T8100 (T760) ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP4 ⎘ 4 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $3.47 Mr.Shield Screen Protector c... 2. $9.99 Fast Charger Type C 25W USB ... 3. $8.99 30W Fast Charger Block 2 Por... List Price: 179€ | 188 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.72" 2400x1080 392 PPI IPS | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 610 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $287.50 Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G ... 2. $334.99 Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G ... 3. $225.00 Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G ... List Price: 199€ | 188.5 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" 2400x1080 395 PPI AMOLED |
Table of Contents
- Redmi Note 14 LTE 评价 - 整体性强,但缺乏亮点
- 规格
- 外壳 -Redmi Note 14 附带 IP 认证
- 功能 - Redmi 提供音频插孔和 microSD
- 软件 - HyperOS 位于Redmi Note 14
- 通信和全球导航卫星系统 - Note 14 出现小幅中断
- 电话功能和语音质量 -Redmi Note 14 的声音有些刺耳
- 摄像头 - 视频不是Redmi Note 14 的强项之一
- 附件和保修 -Redmi Note 14 附带一个保护套和电源适配器
- 输入设备和操作 - 使用Redmi Note 14 快速解锁
- 显示屏 - 120 Hz,采用 AMOLED 显示屏Redmi Note 14
- 性能 -Redmi Note 14 属于平均水平
- 排放--Note 14 声音很大,但保持冷静
- 电池续航时间 -Redmi Note 14 持久耐用
- Notebookcheck 总体评分
凭借红米 14,小米不仅推出了一款智能手机,而且还推出了一个完整的系列。除了 Note 14,还有 Note 14 Pro 和 Note 14 Pro+。Note 14 和 Note 14 Pro 还有 5G 和 LTE 版本。
这次评测的是入门级机型Redmi Note 14 LTE。这款手机有不同规格的版本。基本款智能手机配备 6 GB 内存和 128 GB 存储空间。此外,还有 8 GB 内存和 128 或 256 GB 存储空间可供选择。
有三种颜色可供选择:青柠绿、午夜黑和海洋蓝。我们的评测机型为黑色,拥有最大的存储配置。
规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 -Redmi Note 14 附带 IP 认证
红米 Note 14 采用塑料背壳,边框由铝合金制成。显示屏由康宁大猩猩 5 号玻璃保护。甚至还通过了 IP 认证,尽管只有 IP54。
制造质量令人印象深刻:缝隙小而均匀,智能手机不仅坚固,而且即使受力也很难弯曲。边框和机身背面均为磨砂处理,相对不易沾染指纹。只有三个镜头周围的玻璃状元件是真正的灰尘磁铁。
功能 - Redmi 提供音频插孔和 microSD
小米公司宣传Redmi Note 14 配备 108 万像素摄像头、5500 毫安时电池和 120 赫兹刷新率。这款智能手机还提供 3.5 毫米音频插孔、NFC、红外爆破器和通过混合插槽中的 microSD 卡扩展内存等功能。
USB-C 端口仅支持 USB 2.0,但支持 exFAT 和 NTFS 作为外部数据存储设备的文件系统。在我们的测试中,当与三星 980 Pro 固态硬盘搭配使用时,我们测得的传输速度为 24.7 MB/s。
microSD 读卡器 - Redmi 最高可扩展至 1 TB
Redmi Note 14 的内部存储空间可以使用 microSD 卡进行扩展。红米 14 最高可容纳 1 TB 的存储卡,在测试中,我们使用 AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60 作为参考卡。
通过三次测量,我们获得了 24.7 MB/s 的平均传输速度。这使得 Note 14 与前代产品不相上下。三星Galaxy A15 的传输速度几乎是前者的两倍,证明了在这个级别的产品中,你可以获得更快的速度。
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Samsung Galaxy A15 (Angelbird V60) | |
Motorola Moto G35 (Angelbird V60) | |
Average of class Smartphone (7.7 - 77, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Angelbird V60) | |
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro (Angelbird AV Pro V60) |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
软件 - HyperOS 位于Redmi Note 14
Redmi Note 14 预装了Android 14 和小米 HyperOS 1.0。在审查时,安全补丁是从 2024 年 11 月开始的。Note 14 系列没有统一的更新政策。令人惊讶的是,最便宜的Redmi Note 14 获得的支持时间最长:Redmi Note 14 将获得四年的操作系统更新和六年的安全更新。
HyperOS 提供多种设置选项。不过,该设备也附带了大量的臃肿软件。除了大量的小米和谷歌应用程序外,还有来自微软、游戏供应商和第三方供应商(如 TikToc、Facebook、阿里巴巴、Booking 等)的软件。除小米应用程序外,所有程序都可以轻松删除。
可持续性 -Redmi Note 14 具有较长的搁置寿命
小米尚未提供有关Redmi Note 14 碳足迹的任何信息。该设备的包装很少使用塑料,制造商宣传说这款智能手机特别耐用。小米希望通过坚固的结构、吸水泡沫元件和加固边角等材料来实现这一目标。
小米承诺其电池寿命长达 4 年,据说这是通过智能充电管理实现的。
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - Note 14 出现小幅中断
小米Redmi Note 14 仅支持 Wi-Fi 5。在我们的测试中,当与我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 配对时,它的传输速度达到了同类产品的典型水平。
在记录的测量中,传输稳定,没有出现掉线现象。但在日常使用中,我们发现Redmi Note 14 经常会在几秒钟内失去 Wi-Fi 连接,而其他设备却能保持网络连接。
说到移动数据,该设备的表现并不突出,但在我们的测试中,它的传输很稳定。Note 14 系列中最便宜的机型不支持 5G。此外,频段覆盖率相对较低,但支持所有欧洲相关频段。
电话功能和语音质量 -Redmi Note 14 的声音有些刺耳
小米Redmi Note 14 使用谷歌电话应用程序。软件界面简洁,不会给用户带来任何困惑。通话质量还不错,但听筒让对方的声音听起来有点刺耳。背景噪音也可以抑制得更好,但没有干扰。
通过扬声器通话时,设备的声音足够大。
摄像头 - 视频不是Redmi Note 14 的强项之一
虽然小米在Redmi Note 14 中安装了三个镜头,但真正值得重视的只有 10800 万像素的主摄像头。另外两个镜头各有 200 万像素,一个用于微距拍摄,另一个提供景深信息。微距拍摄的噪点很高,只有在光线条件非常好的情况下才能使用。没有超广角镜头,只能进行数字变焦。
另一方面,主摄像头的质量大多令人印象深刻。照片清晰度高,处理速度快。不过,相比之下,色彩就显得比较暗淡了。数码变焦还不错,但动态范围继续缩小,拍摄对象也有些模糊。如果需要,可以全分辨率拍摄照片。此外,还有一个专业模式,可以手动设置白平衡、对焦、曝光时间和 ISO。
2000 万像素前置摄像头拍摄的照片不够清晰。图像有时会显得柔和、暗淡。不过,人像模式运行稳定。Redmi Note 14 可录制最高分辨率为 1080p 和 60fps 的视频,而前置摄像头只能录制 30fps 的视频。
视频质量一般,而且由于缺乏防抖功能,需要稳定的手。曝光校正和自动对焦效果不错。不过,在我们的测试中,即使是短视频也会出现图像错误和录制卡顿。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43961/4396158867e41e842c1924274cbe413b8365baae" alt="ColorChecker"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/532d8/532d87ec0c3547ec8b0a6e676e543cd5173cccbe" alt="ColorChecker"
附件和保修 -Redmi Note 14 附带一个保护套和电源适配器
输入设备和操作 - 使用Redmi Note 14 快速解锁
显示屏 - 120 Hz,采用 AMOLED 显示屏Redmi Note 14
Redmi Note 14 采用 6.67 英寸 AMOLED 面板。最高刷新率为 120 Hz。软件会在工作前进行自动调整。如果需要,也可以将该值设置为 60 或 120 Hz。根据 DRM 信息,只有 90 Hz 的中间档。
在测试中,我们测得在环境光传感器激活时的最大亮度为 1,176 cd/m²。这使得面板亮度略高于前代产品。与同类设备相比,Redmi Note 14 表现不俗。此外,显示屏发光均匀。通过 HDR 测量,我们达到了承诺的 1,800 cd/m² 亮度(APL18:1,734 cd/m²)。
在没有环境光传感器的情况下,我们测得的亮度为 470 尼特。在测量过程中,我们还发现屏幕以两种不同的频率闪烁,一种是 OLED 闪烁,另一种是 PWM 闪烁,但频率高达 980 Hz。
在小米Redmi Note 14 的设置中,有一个 "始终显示 "选项。不过,这并不是真正的 "始终显示"。显示屏可以自定义,但在几分钟不活动后就会关闭。
|
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 1164 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.89
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Samsung Galaxy A15 Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.5" | Motorola Moto G35 IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 1% | -39% | -81% | -6% | |
Brightness middle | 1164 | 1016 -13% | 731 -37% | 1069 -8% | 940 -19% |
Brightness | 1169 | 1016 -13% | 711 -39% | 976 -17% | 922 -21% |
Brightness Distribution | 99 | 94 -5% | 93 -6% | 88 -11% | 96 -3% |
Black Level * | 0.7 | ||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 1.1 15% | 2.31 -78% | 3.32 -155% | 1.2 8% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.5 | 1.9 24% | 3.51 -40% | 5.48 -119% | 2.28 9% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 1.3 -0% | 1.7 -31% | 3.6 -177% | 1.4 -8% |
Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.28 96% | 2.091 105% | 2.167 102% | 2.27 97% |
CCT | 6531 100% | 6420 101% | 6424 101% | 6141 106% | 6503 100% |
Contrast | 1527 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 120 Hz Amplitude: 14.71 % Secondary Frequency: 980 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8619 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
以固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置进行的一系列测量(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平,但这是缩放造成的。最小亮度下的振幅放大图可在信息框中查看)。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1.47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.782 ms rise | |
↘ 0.6875 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
1.98 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.032 ms rise | |
↘ 0.9475 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.7 ms). |
性能 -Redmi Note 14 属于平均水平
小米Redmi Note 14 不再使用 Snapdragon CPU,而是采用了 联发科 Helio G99.正如基准测试结果所显示的,这比 骁龙 685 4G中的 Redmi Note 13.
该芯片可能并不新鲜,但它也安装在该细分市场的其他设备上,如 Poco M6 Pro或 三星Galaxy A15这两款产品都已上市一段时间了。正如您所期望的那样,这些设备的性能彼此相似。
在日常使用中,Redmi Note 14 通常都能流畅运行。但是,在运行要求较高的应用程序或同时运行多项任务时,就会出现卡顿现象。
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 81594, n=148, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE | |
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro | |
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (6323 - 9695, n=10) | |
Samsung Galaxy A15 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G |
AImark - Score v3.x | |
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 307528, n=139, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy A15 | |
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (842 - 982, n=9) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G |
Geekbench AI | |
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1 | |
Average of class Smartphone (122 - 4619, n=45, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Moto G35 | |
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1 | |
Average of class Smartphone (122 - 32432, n=45, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Moto G35 | |
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1 | |
Average of class Smartphone (118 - 44657, n=45, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Moto G35 |
AI Benchmark - Score V6 | |
Average of class Smartphone (68.9 - 10957, n=29, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE | |
Average Mediatek Helio G99 () |
Redmi Note 14 的图形芯片,小米采用了 Mali-G57 MP2与 Poco M6 Pro 使用的是同一款芯片。 Poco M6 Pro和 三星Galaxy A15 4G.不出所料,基准测试的结果非常相似。不过 摩托罗拉 Moto G35的 Mali-G57 MP4.
其图形性能足以在高清环境下流畅地玩《PUBG Mobile》等要求苛刻的游戏。
在浏览器基准测试和内存测量方面也没有任何惊喜。Redmi Note 14 的成绩属于同类产品的典型水平,比上一代产品略胜一筹。
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
Motorola Moto G35 | |
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE | |
Samsung Galaxy A15 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
Motorola Moto G35 | |
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE | |
Samsung Galaxy A15 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G |
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
Motorola Moto G35 | |
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE | |
Samsung Galaxy A15 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G |
3DMark / Wild Life Score | |
Motorola Moto G35 | |
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE | |
Samsung Galaxy A15 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | |
Motorola Moto G35 | |
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE | |
Samsung Galaxy A15 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | |
Motorola Moto G35 | |
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE | |
Samsung Galaxy A15 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | |
Motorola Moto G35 | |
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE | |
Samsung Galaxy A15 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A15 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A15 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A15 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A15 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE | |
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A15 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A15 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE | |
Samsung Galaxy A15 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE | |
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A15 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Motorola Moto G35 | |
Samsung Galaxy A15 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE | |
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Motorola Moto G35 | |
Samsung Galaxy A15 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE | |
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Motorola Moto G35 | |
Samsung Galaxy A15 | |
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Motorola Moto G35 | |
Samsung Galaxy A15 | |
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Motorola Moto G35 | |
Samsung Galaxy A15 | |
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (111.1 - 387, n=168, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE (chrome 132) | |
Samsung Galaxy A15 (Chrome 122) | |
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro (chrome 122) | |
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (46.9 - 80.9, n=10) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Chrome 120) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=149, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE (chrome 132) | |
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro (chrome 122) | |
Samsung Galaxy A15 (Chrome 122) | |
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (24.1 - 80.7, n=10) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Chrome 120) |
WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=157, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE (Chrome 132) | |
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro (Chrome 122) | |
Samsung Galaxy A15 (Chrome 122) | |
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (39 - 89, n=10) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Chrome 120) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=205, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Moto G35 (Chrome 128) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE (chrome 132) | |
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro (chrome 122) | |
Samsung Galaxy A15 (Chrome 122) | |
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (17228 - 25005, n=18) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Chrome 120) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Chrome 120) | |
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1671 - 2444, n=10) | |
Samsung Galaxy A15 (Chrome 122) | |
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro (chrome 122) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE (chrome 132) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=165, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE | Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A15 | Motorola Moto G35 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G | Average 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 8% | -5% | 22% | -10% | 1% | 68% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 980.55 | 973.53 -1% | 967.8 -1% | 989.3 1% | 909.8 -7% | 903 ? -8% | 1941 ? 98% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 835.49 | 910.9 9% | 488.5 -42% | 860.3 3% | 606.3 -27% | 719 ? -14% | 1558 ? 86% |
Random Read 4KB | 202.22 | 236.72 17% | 233.2 15% | 272.1 35% | 177.1 -12% | 229 ? 13% | 280 ? 38% |
Random Write 4KB | 213.23 | 228.61 7% | 229.6 8% | 318.9 50% | 228 7% | 240 ? 13% | 320 ? 50% |
排放--Note 14 声音很大,但保持冷静
温度 - Note 14 并非头脑发热
在日常生活中,Redmi Note 14 的温度始终很低。即使在玩游戏时,设备也几乎不会发热。在极端负载情况下,即在 "Burnout "基准测试中,设备上部的最高温度为 38.2 摄氏度。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test
3DMark | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE | |
Samsung Galaxy A15 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G | |
Motorola Moto G35 | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G | |
Motorola Moto G35 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE | |
Samsung Galaxy A15 | |
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE |
扬声器 - 红米扬声器明显优于前代产品
小米 Radmi Note 14 配有立体声扬声器,声音通过听筒向前方和手机顶部上方发出。即使开到最大音量,边框和后部也不会出现振动。
与前代产品相比,最大音量明显增大。中音也很好,很线性。不过,即使是智能手机,也完全缺乏低音和低频。小米Redmi Note 14 配备了 3.5 毫米音频接口。其信噪比为 77.25 dBFS,虽然还算不错,但并不理想。
在我们的测试中,这款智能手机可以轻松连接各种蓝牙耳机。支持以下标准:SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、LDAC、aptX Adaptive、aptX TWS+、LHDC V1/V2/V3/V4/V5。
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电池续航时间 -Redmi Note 14 持久耐用
耗电量
在Redmi Note 14 中,小米调整了 联发科 Helio G99与 Poco M6 Pro.在负载情况下,红米手机的功耗更低。Redmi Note 14 也比上一年的 Note 13 更经济。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE 5500 mAh | Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A15 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G 5000 mAh | Average Mediatek Helio G99 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -21% | 3% | -12% | -35% | -40% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.05 | 1 5% | 1.1 -5% | 1.1 -5% | 1.038 ? 1% | 0.877 ? 16% |
Idle Average * | 1.27 | 1.19 6% | 1.2 6% | 1.3 -2% | 1.852 ? -46% | 1.455 ? -15% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.31 | 1.33 -2% | 1.5 -15% | 1.5 -15% | 2.07 ? -58% | 1.604 ? -22% |
Load Average * | 3.12 | 6.27 -101% | 2.9 7% | 3.6 -15% | 4.91 ? -57% | 6.79 ? -118% |
Load Maximum * | 6.24 | 7.19 -15% | 4.8 23% | 7.8 -25% | 7.24 ? -16% | 10.2 ? -63% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
电池续航时间 -Redmi Note 14 是一款长距离跑步机
Redmi Note 14 将经济型处理器、AMOLED 显示屏和 5,500 毫安时大电池结合在一起。总的来说,我们取得了非常不错的续航时间。在我们进行的 Wi-Fi 上网冲浪实际测试中,Redmi Note 14 持续使用了超过 17.5 个小时才需要充电。
在日常生活中,使用两天不成问题。即使在玩游戏时,这款智能手机也能轻松使用一天而无需充电。使用随附的 33 瓦电源适配器,Redmi Note 14 可以在 35 分钟内从 10% 充电到 60%,在 60 分钟内从 10% 充电到 90%。
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE | |
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A15 | |
Motorola Moto G35 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
小米Redmi Note 14 性能不错,但在同类产品中并不算高。其性能比上一代产品更好,现在也具有竞争力。不过,Note 14 仍然算不上是一款高性能设备。红米智能手机没有犯任何错误,但除了电池续航时间外,它也缺乏一点亮点。
Redmi Note 14 的整体包装很协调。功能、做工和附带的额外功能都令人印象深刻,尤其是在价格方面。对于要求更高的用户,制造商还提供 Note 14 5G、Note 14 Pro、Note 14 Pro 5G 和 Note 14 Pro+ 5G。
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
- 02/10/2025 v8
Benedikt Winkel
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.