Notebookcheck Logo

小米 Poco M6 Pro 智能手机评测--平价显示器之王

Suddenly Pro.

小米已将其 Poco M6 变为 Pro 机型。该版本配备了 120-Hz 显示屏和三摄像头。此外，这款智能手机还具有可扩展存储空间、音频插孔和红外爆破器等功能。我们的评测将揭示制造商的删减之处。
Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Poco 宣称 M6 Pro 是一款功能强大的设备，售价仅为 200 多美元。M5 没有 Pro 版本，只有 M5和 M5s.在我们的 测试其强大的 SoC、高系统性能和 90Hz 显示屏给我们留下了深刻印象。由于定位服务不佳和缺少 5G 支持，它被扣分了。

Poco 只提供 Pro 版本的 M6。您可以选择 8 GB 内存和 256 GB 存储空间，或 12 GB 内存和 512 GB 存储空间。智能手机有三种颜色：黑色、蓝色或紫色。目前，小尺寸版本的售价为 239.99 美元，大尺寸版本的售价约为 259 美元。我们的测试机为紫色，存储容量较大。

Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro (Poco M6 Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio G99 8 x 2 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G57 MP2
Memory
12 GB 
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, Capacitive, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 512 GB 
, 483 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, compass, proximity sensor, gyroscope, IR blaster, OTG
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.2, GSM (Band 2/3/5/8), UMTS (WCDMA Band 1/2/4/5/6/8/19), LTE (LTE FDD Band 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/17/18/19/20/26/28/66; LTE TDD Band 38/40/41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.98 x 161.1 x 74.95
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix 1/2" sensor size (f/1.79) OIS + 8 MPix ultra-wide (f/2.2) 118° FOV + 2MPix macro (f/2.4)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.45
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: OnScreen, Case, charging cradle, SIM needle, MIUI 14, 24 Months Warranty, GNSS: GPS L1; GLONASS G1; BDS B1; Galileo E1; IP54; DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3; SAR-Head: 0.992 W/kg, SAR-Body: 0.993 W/kg, fanless
Weight
181 g, Power Supply: 120 g
Price
299 Euro
Amazon
$185.99
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
81.5 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2024
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2		181 g512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080
79.4 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2023
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2		202 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2408x1080
80.7 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2023
Motorola Moto G54
Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256		177 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.50"2400x1080
80.2 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2024
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
SD 685, Adreno 610		188.5 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080
78.9 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2022
Xiaomi Poco M5
Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2		201 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.58"2408x1080

Poco M6 Pro 的边框和背面由塑料制成，因此重量很轻，只有 181 克。尽管材料选择和重量较轻，但这款智能手机几乎无法弯曲，而且做工非常出色。背面的摄像头比较突出，导致当你坐在桌子上打字时，设备会晃动得很厉害。

纤细的边框和简洁的按键设计非常不错。手机背面一分为二，非常醒目，但由于非常闪亮，很容易沾染灰尘和指纹。它的显示屏由康宁大猩猩 Glas 5 保护，通过了 IP54 防尘防水认证。

尺寸比较

❌
167.7 mm 78 mm 9.1 mm 202 g162.2 mm 75.6 mm 8 mm 188.5 g161.6 mm 73.8 mm 8 mm 177 g161.1 mm 74.95 mm 7.98 mm 181 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性 - Poco M6 Pro 配备音频插孔和 microSD 插槽

Poco M6 Pro 的连接选择很不错。小米为该机配备了 Helio G99-Ultra SoC 和 12GB RAM。它的 512GB 内置存储空间可借助 microSD 卡进行扩展。此外，它还支持 NFC、3.5 毫米音频插孔，甚至还配备了红外触发器。

遗憾的是，它的 USB-C 端口只能提供 USB-2.0 的速度，但支持用于外部存储驱动器的 exFAT 和 NTFS 数据系统。在我们使用三星 980 Pro 固态硬盘进行的复制测试中，它的传输速率达到了 26.8 MB/s。

底部：扬声器、USB、麦克风
底部：扬声器、USB、麦克风
右：音量摇杆、电源按钮
右：音量摇杆、电源按钮
左：SIM 卡插槽
左：SIM 卡插槽
顶部：音频插孔、扬声器、红外爆破器、麦克风
顶部：音频插孔、扬声器、红外爆破器、麦克风

microSD 读卡器

虽然 Poco M6 Pro 配备了至少 256 GB 的内部存储空间，但可以使用 microSD 卡进行外部扩展。卡的最大容量为 1 TB，并安装在一个混合插槽中。M6 Pro 支持 exFAT 格式，但在我们的测试中，它的数据传输结果很低。

在使用 Angelbird AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60 作为参考卡时，我们测得的传输速率为 22.1 MB/s。这使得 M6 Pro 比M5 还要慢。三星Galaxy A14 5G 的速度几乎是它的两倍。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
50.48 MB/s +128%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash (Angelbird V60)
36.2 MB/s +64%
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
24.6 MB/s +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
24.3 MB/s +10%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
22.1 MB/s

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø37.2 (28.8-46.3)
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø37.2 (22.3-48.4)
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø64.4 (40.3-78.4)
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø75.7 (20.1-83.4)

软件 - Poco 尚未配备超级操作系统

小米交付的 Poco M6 Pro 已安装Android 13 和 MIUI 14。根据制造商的说法，Poco M6 Pro 5G 将在 2026 年 9 月之前收到两个主要的Android 版本更新和安全补丁。更新将每三个月推出一次。我们假设我们正在测试的 4G 版本也将获得同样的更新，但是，该机型并未列入小米的更新计划中。.

开箱后，手机已安装了一些小米和谷歌的应用程序，此外，还有许多第三方应用程序充斥着手机，如亚马逊、阿里巴巴、Booking、Opera、TikTok 等。值得庆幸的是，所有这些应用程序都可以轻松卸载。出厂时，28.4 GB 的内置存储空间已经用完。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 WiFi 5 但没有 5G 的 M6 Pro

Poco M6 Pro 仅支持 WiFi 5。结合我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000，我们的测试设备达到了同价位产品的平均传输速率，即大大超过 300 Mbit/s。只有在传输过程中出现的一次大掉线使情况稍显不妙。

移动数据可使用两张实体 SIM 卡，但不支持 eSIM 卡。M6 支持 19 个 LTE 频率，覆盖范围特别广。另一方面，M6 Pro 不支持 5G。在测试过程中，我们从未遇到过任何接收问题。

Networking
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
390 (min: 366) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
357 (min: 59) MBit/s ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
369 (min: 361) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
369 (min: 337) MBit/s ∼51%
Motorola Moto G54
iperf3 receive AXE11000
365 (min: 347) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
306 (min: 277) MBit/s ∼42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
317 (min: 293) MBit/s ∼44%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
364 (min: 336) MBit/s ∼50%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
714 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
729 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼100%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360380Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø377 (366-387)
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, ARM Mali-G57 MP2; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø366 (361-371)
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø357 (59-385)
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, ARM Mali-G57 MP2; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø369 (337-380)
室内全球导航卫星系统测量
室内全球导航卫星系统测量
户外全球导航卫星系统测量
户外全球导航卫星系统测量

Poco M6 Pro 的卫星连接测试结果一般。它支持所有主要的卫星系统，但每个系统只支持一个频段。

事实证明，它在室外的接收效果不错，但在室内或较为密集的区域，其准确性就会大打折扣。

在我们使用 Garmin Venu 2 作为对比设备进行的自行车旅行中，当绕过一幢幢房屋时，这种情况就很明显了。

全球导航卫星系统测量：环湖旅行
全球导航卫星系统测量：环湖旅行
全球导航卫星系统测量：转折点
全球导航卫星系统测量：转折点
全球导航卫星系统测量：概要
全球导航卫星系统测量：概要

电话功能和通话质量 - Poco M6 Pro 没有任何问题

小米 Poco M6 Pro 依靠谷歌的标准电话应用程序拨打电话。该软件界面友好、清晰，可以为不同的 SIM 卡创建不同的通话帐户。您还可以自动拦截垃圾电话。

它的通话质量很好。我们注意到没有背景噪音，所有声音都能清晰地传输，扬声器的声音也足够大。

相机 - Poco M6 Pro 需要大量光线

Poco M6 Pro 的自拍照
Poco M6 Pro 的自拍照

Poco M6 Pro 背面有三个镜头。其主摄像头分辨率为 6400 万像素，具有 OIS 功能。在光线条件良好的情况下，主摄像头的照片看起来还不错，但肯定不是什么亮点。色彩描绘自然，但锐利度不高。使用超广角镜头时，清晰度会进一步下降，一些细节会丢失。

使用数码变焦拍摄的照片，尤其是在低光照条件下拍摄的照片，会让系统不堪重负。软件为长曝光拍摄或使用 6400 万像素全分辨率拍摄照片提供了特殊模式。按照标准，智能手机使用像素二进制。它还具有专业模式，可以手动设置白平衡、曝光时间、ISO、对焦和光线校正。

视频录制最高可达 1080p 和 60fps。其自动对焦功能快速可靠。还可以进行特写拍摄。尽管配备了 OIS，但要拍摄出稳定的视频还是需要稳定的操作。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

RabbitLakeUltra-wide angle5x zoomLow-light
ColorChecker
6.8 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
2 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
7 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
2 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro: 4.77 ∆E min: 2.04 - max: 10.16 ∆E
ColorChecker
30 ∆E
55.5 ∆E
40.2 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
46.1 ∆E
62.8 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
65.5 ∆E
64.5 ∆E
31.9 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
38.2 ∆E
77.1 ∆E
45 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
94.8 ∆E
71.7 ∆E
52.9 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro: 47.61 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 94.84 ∆E

配件和保修 - 小米随附保护套和电源供应器

小米为这款手机提供了丰富的配件。除了设备本身，你还会得到一个 67 瓦的电源、一条 USB 数据线（USB-A 转 USB-C），甚至还有一个保护套。手机还预装了屏幕保护膜。Poco M6 Pro 提供标准的 12 个月保修服务。

小米为 Poco M6 Pro 配备保护壳和 67 瓦电源
小米为 Poco M6 Pro 配备保护壳和 67 瓦电源

输入设备和操作 - 快速解锁 M6 Pro

小米 Poco M6 Pro 开箱即安装了 GBoard 键盘。这使得输入时不会出现任何错误。输入到边缘都能可靠识别。同时，安装的屏幕保护膜也不会妨碍操作，手指可以很好地在表面滑动。

您可以使用安装在显示屏内的光学指纹传感器解锁手机。在我们的测试中，手指能被可靠地识别。不过，传感器的位置比较靠下，速度可能会更快一些。使用手机的 2D 面部识别功能会更快，该功能依赖于摄像头，在光线充足的条件下，效果非常好。你可以选择完全跳过锁屏。

Poco M6 Pro 的振动由线性 Z 轴振动电机控制。它的工作安静而巧妙。

显示屏 - Poco M6 Pro 的亮度达到 1000 尼特

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

小米为 Poco M6 Pro 安装了一块 6.67 英寸 AMOLED 面板。与 M5 相比，这款机型的刷新率甚至达到了 120 Hz。刷新率可以固定在 60 或 120 Hz，但开箱后软件会自动处理。根据 DRM 信息，可能的刷新率为 60、90 或 120 Hz。

在对比设备中，它的最大亮度令人印象深刻。在激活环境光传感器的情况下，我们在所有测量点测得的平均最大亮度为 1016.4 cd/m²。在 APL18 测量中，该面板甚至达到了 1289 尼特。得益于其设计，该面板还提供了完美的黑阶和巨大的对比度。

在测试过程中，我们还注意到显示屏会闪烁。小米宣传的 PWM 调光频率为 1920 Hz。在使用最低屏幕亮度时，我们测得的频率为 1612 Hz。不过，我们也测到了另一个频率为 119 Hz 的闪烁。这可能是由于黑框插入造成的，黑框插入用于减少运动模糊和保护老化。

1015
cd/m²		1015
cd/m²		1045
cd/m²
1011
cd/m²		1016
cd/m²		1041
cd/m²
1001
cd/m²		987
cd/m²		1017
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1045 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1016.4 cd/m² Minimum: 2.62 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 1016 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.28
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"		Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
PLS LCD, 2408x1080, 6.6"		Motorola Moto G54
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.5"		Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Screen
-304%
-138%
-9%
Brightness middle
1016
579
-43%
492
-52%
940
-7%
Brightness
1016
543
-47%
470
-54%
922
-9%
Brightness Distribution
94
87
-7%
90
-4%
96
2%
Black Level *
0.57
0.3
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.1
7.6
-591%
3.9
-255%
1.2
-9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.9
12.7
-568%
6.26
-229%
2.28
-20%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.3
8.7
-569%
4.3
-231%
1.4
-8%
Gamma
2.28 96%
2.23 99%
2.275 97%
2.27 97%
CCT
6420 101%
9344 70%
7656 85%
6503 100%
Contrast
1016
1640

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 119 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 119 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 119 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列

小米 Poco M6 Pro 的显示屏校准良好。很多时候，我们注意到的偏差低于肉眼可感知的范围。根据卡尔曼 2D 测量，sRGB 色彩空间的覆盖率为 100%。

色彩精度（标准配色方案、标准色温、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩精度（标准配色方案、标准色温、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩空间（标准配色方案、标准色温、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩空间（标准配色方案、标准色温、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
灰度（标准色彩方案、标准色温、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
灰度（标准色彩方案、标准色温、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩饱和度（标准配色方案、标准色温、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩饱和度（标准配色方案、标准色温、目标色彩空间 sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.663 ms rise
↘ 0.6445 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.05 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5005 ms rise
↘ 0.549 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Poco M6 Pro 的最大亮度足以在室外使用，即使是在阳光下。该设备的可视角度也很好，几乎从任何角度都能看清内容。

性能 - 与前代 Poco 相同的 SoC

小米 Poco M6 Pro 采用了与其前代产品类似的 SoC，即 联发科 Helio G99-不过现在有了 Ultra 后缀。它的日常性能不错。这款智能手机运行流畅，甚至能快速启动大型应用程序。不过，当我们查看基准测试结果时，并没有发现性能的提升；联发科的名称后缀可能会有所不同。

M6 Pro 的性能轻松超越了它的企业兄弟 小米Redmi Note 13 4G的 骁龙 685.三星 三星Galaxy A14 5G配备 联发科 Dimensity 700也比它差很多。

Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.3 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | Antutu v10
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=172, last 2 years)
995 Points +81%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
697 Points +26%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
551 Points
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
548 Points -1%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (490 - 576, n=17)
547 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
525 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
437 Points -21%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6687, n=172, last 2 years)
3312 Points +74%
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1924 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
1903 Points
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
1903 Points 0%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (1670 - 1981, n=17)
1828 Points -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
1775 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1700 Points -11%
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=161, last 2 years)
1446 Points +98%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
916 Points +25%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
730 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (710 - 738, n=11)
728 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
478 Points -35%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=161, last 2 years)
4028 Points +102%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
2315 Points +16%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
1994 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (1864 - 2065, n=11)
1987 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
1544 Points -23%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
13268 Points +25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 24088, n=190, last 2 years)
12976 Points +22%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
10603 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (8885 - 11379, n=17)
9894 Points -7%
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
9587 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
8038 Points -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
7305 Points -31%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 1517, n=157, last 2 years)
884 Points +56%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
628 Points +11%
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
602 Points +6%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
568 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (526 - 602, n=10)
565 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
534 Points -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
369 Points -35%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)
6297 Points +107%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
3773 Points +24%
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3050 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
3041 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (2855 - 3120, n=10)
3006 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2825 Points -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
2728 Points -10%
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)
10163 Points +64%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
6911 Points +11%
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
6637 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
6320 Points +2%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (5261 - 6776, n=10)
6230 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
6208 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
5508 Points -11%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)
6767 Points +81%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
5004 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3991 Points +7%
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3802 Points +2%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (3454 - 4152, n=10)
3764 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
3732 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
3285 Points -12%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)
16908 Points +471%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
4200 Points +42%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
2959 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (2683 - 3002, n=10)
2799 Points -5%
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2744 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2676 Points -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
2331 Points -21%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)
1564 Points +25%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
1394 Points +12%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (1150 - 1325, n=10)
1252 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1250 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
1247 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
1144 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1083 Points -13%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 74958, n=143, last 2 years)
16841 Points +84%
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
9493 Points +4%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
9164 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (6323 - 9695, n=9)
8584 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
6303 Points -31%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
6014 Points -34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
4615 Points -50%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=98, last 2 years)
1232320 Points +192%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
421861 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (383511 - 421861, n=5)
400611 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
352825 Points -16%

处理器 ARM Mali-G57 MP 2图形处理器导致 Poco M6 Pro 很少能在我们的对比排名中名列前茅。不过，这足以保证平均成绩和运行当前游戏。您可以在高清环境下流畅地玩《PUBG Mobile》，帧率也不错。

在浏览器基准测试中，Poco M6 Pro 的表现也与对比设备相当。内部存储为它加分不少。它符合 UFS 2.2 标准，容量大，与同类产品相比传输速率快。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
335 Points
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
323 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
310 Points -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
135 Points -60%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
345 Points
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
342 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
324 Points -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
139 Points -60%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1221 Points
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1155 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1139 Points -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
634 Points -48%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1233 Points
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1205 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1191 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
645 Points -48%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
3069 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2846 Points +4%
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2838 Points +4%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2724 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2321 Points -15%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
2948 Points +26%
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2378 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2333 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2289 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1383 Points -41%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
2974 Points +23%
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2467 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2410 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2393 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1519 Points -37%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3727 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3652 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3618 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
3524 Points -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2739 Points -25%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2440 Points
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2413 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
2397 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2347 Points -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1427 Points -42%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2634 Points
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2618 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
2580 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2546 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1597 Points -39%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
69 fps +23%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
56 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
56 fps
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
54 fps -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps -29%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
74 fps +17%
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
64 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
64 fps +2%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
63 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
45 fps -29%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
57 fps +54%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
37 fps
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
36 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
27 fps -27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps -41%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
62 fps +55%
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
36 fps -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps -40%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
33 fps +43%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps -4%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps -9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps -39%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
35 fps +35%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps -4%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps -38%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
18 fps +38%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.7 fps -41%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
19 fps +27%
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.8 fps -41%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
11 fps +33%
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.8 fps +6%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.3 fps
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.9 fps -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.5 fps -34%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
7.1 fps +31%
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.8 fps +7%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.4 fps
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.3 fps -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.6 fps -33%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
19 fps +58%
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps +17%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.5 fps -21%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
20 fps +43%
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps +14%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
10 fps -29%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
3 fps +25%
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.5 fps +4%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.4 fps
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.3 fps -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1.5 fps -37%
Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 4 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)
120.4 Points +64%
Motorola Moto G54 (Chrome 118.0.5993.80)
85.936 Points +17%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro (chrome 122)
73.5 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (46.9 - 80.9, n=9)
66.5 Points -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Chrome 120)
62.375 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G (Chrome 112)
48.955 Points -33%
Xiaomi Poco M5 (Chrome 107)
46.877 Points -36%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)
136.2 runs/min +108%
Motorola Moto G54 (Chrome 118.0.5993.80)
76.5 runs/min +17%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro (chrome 122)
65.46 runs/min
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (24.1 - 80.7, n=9)
52.5 runs/min -20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Chrome 120)
52.4 runs/min -20%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G (Chrome 112)
34.4 runs/min -47%
Xiaomi Poco M5 (Chome 107)
24.09 runs/min -63%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=152, last 2 years)
113.8 Points +40%
Motorola Moto G54 (Chrome 118.0.5993.80)
97 Points +20%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro (Chrome 122)
81 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (39 - 89, n=9)
69.6 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G (2111)
50 Points -38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Chrome 120)
49 Points -40%
Xiaomi Poco M5 (Chrome 107)
39 Points -52%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
148.7 Points
Motorola Moto G54 (Chrome 118.0.5993.80)
120 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (80 - 112, n=8)
95.4 Points
Xiaomi Poco M5 (Chrome 107)
88 Points
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)
37161 Points +64%
Motorola Moto G54 (Chrome 118.0.5993.80)
28919 Points +28%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro (chrome 122)
22678 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (17228 - 25005, n=17)
20999 Points -7%
Xiaomi Poco M5 (Chrome 107)
17228 Points -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Chrome 120)
15900 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G (Chrome 112)
15352 Points -32%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Chrome 120)
2534.6 ms * -31%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G (Chrome 112)
2337.2 ms * -21%
Xiaomi Poco M5 (Chrome 107)
2213.3 ms * -15%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1671 - 2444, n=9)
2058 ms * -7%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro (chrome 122)
1932.3 ms *
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)
1568 ms * +19%
Motorola Moto G54 (Chrome 118.0.5993.80)
1399.8 ms * +28%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Poco M6 ProSamsung Galaxy A14 5GMotorola Moto G54Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4GAverage 512 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-23%
-3%
-16%
18%
49%
Sequential Read 256KB
973.53
849.3
-13%
983.01
1%
909.8
-7%
1159 ?(934 - 1860, n=5)
19%
1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years)
89%
Sequential Write 256KB
910.9
469.83
-48%
817.55
-10%
606.3
-33%
1051 ?(795 - 1612, n=5)
15%
1425 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years)
56%
Random Read 4KB
236.72
193.63
-18%
232.74
-2%
177.1
-25%
271 ?(237 - 337, n=5)
14%
277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=192, last 2 years)
17%
Random Write 4KB
228.61
204
-11%
224.58
-2%
228
0%
285 ?(222 - 390, n=5)
25%
309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years)
35%

排放 - Poco M6 Pro 性能稳定

温度 - Poco M6 Pro 保持冷静

小米 Poco M6 Pro 的温度在正常范围内。我们在正面测得的最高温度为 39.6 摄氏度。遗憾的是，这些数值几乎无法与对比设备进行比较，因为我们换用了 Burnout 基准进行测量。

在日常使用中，该设备保持低温。只有在玩游戏时，你才会发现它开始发热，但从未达到令人不适的温度。

Max. Load
 39.4 °C36 °C33.9 °C 
 38.4 °C38.7 °C34.6 °C 
 37.2 °C35.7 °C34.4 °C 
Maximum: 39.4 °C
Average: 36.5 °C
33.3 °C37.1 °C36.9 °C
34 °C36.4 °C37.1 °C
34.2 °C36.5 °C37 °C
Maximum: 37.1 °C
Average: 35.8 °C
Power Supply (max.)  29.4 °C | Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 %
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % 0%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.3 %
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.4 % -1%
01234567Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.06 (2.06-2.07)
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø1.978 (1.957-1.988)
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.4 (7.39-7.42)
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø7.2 (7.18-7.21)
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.33 (7.32-7.33)

扬声器 - Poco M6 Pro 上的杜比全景声（Dolby Atmos

说到音频功能，Poco M6 Pro 显示出了自己的优势。除了立体声扬声器外，它还拥有杜比全景声（Dolby Atmos）认证和 3.5 毫米音频接口。我们注意到其信噪比为 85.31 dBFS，这意味着它可以被归类为良好。即使开到最大音量，扬声器也不会使声音失真。手机后部依然没有震动，尽管手机边框确实存在震动。

不过，它的声音没有什么深度。中音均衡，但高音过于突出，几乎没有低音或低频。Poco M6 Pro 支持以下蓝牙编解码器：SBC、AAC、aptX Audio、aptX HD、LDAC、aptX Adaptive Audio 和 aptX TWS+ Audio。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.241.82530.736.13125.635.54026.735.15036.736.46324.634.18017.637.510018.738.812518.239.216015.950.720017.349.625015.252.931514.156.840013.460.550013.867.463014.369.180013.773.5100012.482.2125012.782.1160012.179.9200012.977.6250012.576.8315012.278.9400012.876.7500013.179.9630013.582800013.180.81000013.777.7125001468.71600013.357.1SPL25.291.1N0.787.1median 13.5median 76.7Delta1.211.829.635.63031.224.530.625.833.237.536.825.232.820.236.620.436.317.537.514.439.914.341.915.247.411.951.113.55712.165.512.466.511.770.111.874.511.477.212.376.112.276.712.178.112.28012.979.313.478.513.281.612.98213.682.513.479.313.26524.890.40.681.3median 12.9median 76.10.911.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Poco M6 ProSamsung Galaxy A14 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.4% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - Poco 充电迅速

功耗--M6 Pro 在负载情况下非常耗电

Poco M6 Pro 内相对强大的处理器具有两面性。在空闲模式下，它的功耗值很低。不过，当处于负载状态时，Poco M6 Pro 的耗电量要比竞争对手高出不少。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.12 / 0.13 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1 / 1.19 / 1.33 Watt
Load midlight 6.27 / 7.19 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
5000 mAh		Motorola Moto G54
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Poco M5
5000 mAh		Average Mediatek Helio G99
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-8%
13%
1%
-2%
-22%
-14%
Idle Minimum *
1
0.64
36%
0.9
10%
1.1
-10%
0.9
10%
1.037 ?(0.7 - 1.9, n=9)
-4%
0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years)
11%
Idle Average *
1.19
2.1
-76%
1.2
-1%
1.3
-9%
1.3
-9%
1.917 ?(1.1 - 4.02, n=9)
-61%
1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years)
-22%
Idle Maximum *
1.33
2.17
-63%
1.5
-13%
1.5
-13%
1.9
-43%
2.16 ?(1.33 - 4.07, n=9)
-62%
1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years)
-22%
Load Average *
6.27
3.73
41%
3.3
47%
3.6
43%
4.6
27%
5.11 ?(2.9 - 7.49, n=9)
19%
6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years)
-3%
Load Maximum *
7.19
5.44
24%
5.6
22%
7.8
-8%
6.8
5%
7.36 ?(4.8 - 10.2, n=9)
-2%
9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years)
-36%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro Mediatek Helio G99; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø2.67 (0.937-5.03)
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø2.66 (0.961-4.95)
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro Mediatek Helio G99; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.929 (0.869-1.246)
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.044 (0.961-1.409)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.30.50.70.811.21.41.51.71.922.22.42.52.72.93.13.2Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro Mediatek Helio G99; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.24 (1.735-3.39)
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.41 (2.26-2.81)
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro Mediatek Helio G99; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.929 (0.869-1.246)
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.044 (0.961-1.409)

运行时间 - Poco M6 Pro 在同类产品中处于平均水平

由于配备了 5000 毫安时电池，小米 Poco M6 Pro 实现了良好的续航时间。在我们进行的实际 WiFi 上网测试中，这款智能手机的续航时间超过了 14 小时。这是一个不错的结果，但该级别的其他设备运行时间更长。Poco M5 在测试中的表现也略胜一筹。

这款智能手机可以安全地使用一天，中间无需充电--除非是在大量游戏过程中。在使用率较低的情况下，您也可以连续使用两天而无需充电。由于配备了 67 瓦的充电器，充电速度又快又好。将 M6 Pro 连接到电源装置后，10 分钟内可将电量从 0 充至 30%。将电量从 0 充至 100%则需要 50 分钟。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
14h 05min
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
5000 mAh
845 min
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
5000 mAh
1029 min
Motorola Moto G54
5000 mAh
875 min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
5000 mAh
742 min
Xiaomi Poco M5
5000 mAh
916 min

Pros

+ 明亮的 120 赫兹显示屏
+ 充足的存储空间
+ 存储空间可扩展
+ 音频插孔
+ 立体声扬声器
+ 系统性能
+ 供货范围

Cons

- 无 5G
- 照片缺乏细节
- 低光性能差
- 全球导航卫星系统有时不准确

结论--Poco M6 Pro 的连接性物超所值

小米 Poco M6 Pro 评测。测试设备由德国小米公司提供。
小米 Poco M6 Pro 评测。测试设备由德国小米公司提供。

小米已将其 Poco M6 变为 Pro 机型。在引擎盖下，并没有太大的变化，因为制造商继续使用与前代机型相同的 SoC 前代机型功能。即便如此，这款手机的性能还是非常出色，这一点在基准测试和日常使用中都有所体现。Poco M6 Pro 的性能足以运行当前的游戏，如《PUBG Mobile》。

此外，Poco M6 Pro 还拥有一块 6.67 英寸的 AMOLED 显示屏。它的亮度可达到 1000 尼特以上，并能准确描绘色彩。这意味着这款小米智能手机可以自信地与同价位的竞争对手一较高下。超大的内部存储空间和充足的内存也为其加分不少。

同样令人高兴的是，在设备的连接性方面，Xioami 也没有做任何削减。Poco M6 Pro 配备了 NFC、立体声扬声器、音频插孔、红外触发器，并可通过 microSD 卡扩展存储空间。

Poco M6 Pro 以低廉的价格提供了丰富的连接功能。它的优势在于性能和显示屏。

这么多的亮点不可能没有一点瑕疵。遗憾的是，Poco M6 Pro 还没有为 5G 做好准备。它的卫星定位能力也有待提高。它的 USB 和 microSD 卡传输速率很低。Poco M6 Pro 的摄像头也不一定是亮点。虽然在光线条件良好的情况下，使用主摄像头拍摄的照片看起来不错，但缺少细节。在使用其他镜头时，这种情况会更加明显。

摩托罗拉 摩托罗拉 Moto G54提供了更轻薄的操作系统、5G 支持和性能更好的摄像头。反过来，它的 IPS 显示屏较暗，存储空间也没有那么大。三星 三星Galaxy A14 5G的 SD 卡连接速度更快，软件支持时间更长，但性能却差强人意。

价格和供应情况

小米 Poco M6 Pro 目前在亚马逊上的售价为219.99 美元。

Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro - 03/12/2024 v7 (old)
Benedikt Winkel

Chassis
80%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
52 / 70 → 74%
Weight
90%
Battery
90%
Display
93%
Games Performance
27 / 64 → 42%
Application Performance
74 / 86 → 85%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
78 / 90 → 86%
Camera
58%
Average
71%
82%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

More articles related to this device

Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro (Poco M6 Series)

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 小米 Poco M6 Pro 智能手机评测--平价显示器之王
Benedikt Winkel, 2024-03-18 (Update: 2024-03-18)