Notebookcheck Logo

诺基亚T10平板电脑评测--有更新承诺的便捷平板电脑

平板电脑出租

诺基亚T10是一款8英寸的平板电脑,应该能让商务人士和儿童都感到满意。那些不想购买平板电脑的人也可以通过全包的方式获得它。我们的测试解释了它是否值得考虑购买。
Android ARM Tablet Touchscreen
诺基亚T10
Nokia T10 (T Series)
Processor
Unisoc T7200 8 x 1.6 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G57 MP1
Memory
3 GB 
Display
8.00 inch 16:10, 1280 x 800 pixel 189 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 20 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 512 GB, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, proximity
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9 x 208 x 123.2
Battery
5250 mAh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix AF
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers, charger, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
375 g
Price
169 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
82.2 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2023
Nokia T10
T7200, Mali-G57 MP1
375 g32 GB eMMC Flash8.00"1280x800
80.8 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2023
Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen)
Helio P22T MT8768T, PowerVR GE8320
305 g32 GB eMMC Flash8.00"1280x800
79.7 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2021
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
Helio P22T MT8768T, PowerVR GE8320
366 g32 GB eMMC Flash8.70"1340x800
80.4 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2023
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
MT8169A, Mali-G52 MP2
337 g32 GB eMMC Flash8.00"1280x800

外壳和功能 - 漂亮的塑料后盖

诺基亚T10的8英寸规格完全适合小孩子的手,但你也可以根据要求获得带有LTE的设备,并将其作为导航系统或用于商务旅行。

这是一款真正的全能型手机,它只有一个塑料背面,但它是一种别致的深绿色,带有条纹图案。虽然它看起来不错,但你会发现其稳定性只能算是一般。在强大的压力或扭动下,平板电脑会悄然开裂,液晶显示屏上的图像错误也会显现。

绝对有比诺基亚T10更轻巧、更方便的平板电脑,如 联想Tab M8例如,联想Tab M8的重量要轻70克(约2.8盎司)。

Wi-Fi版本只有3GB的内存和32GB的大容量存储。LTE版本也有4GB/64GB。有限的存储空间可以通过microSD卡扩展。在我们用Angelbird V60参考卡进行的测试中,证明读卡器总体上非常快,但也不时出现读取率强烈下降的情况。

这款手机有一个第二屏幕功能,可以通过Wi-Fi将平板电脑连接到PC上,从而获得一个带有触摸功能的额外屏幕。遗憾的是,NFC不可用,所以不能使用移动支付服务。

诺基亚T10
诺基亚T10
诺基亚T10
诺基亚T10
诺基亚T10
诺基亚T10

尺寸比较

212.5 mm 124.7 mm 8 mm 366 g208 mm 123.2 mm 9 mm 375 g202 mm 137 mm 9.7 mm 337 g199.1 mm 121 mm 8.15 mm 305 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
53.2 MB/s +80%
Average of class Tablet
  (7.61 - 101.6, n=59, last 2 years)
34.1 MB/s +15%
Nokia T10
  (Angelbird V60)
29.6 MB/s
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
  (Angelbird V60)
20.6 MB/s -30%
Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen)
  (Angelbird V60)
17.5 MB/s -41%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Nokia T10 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø37.8 (25.8-45.2)
Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen) PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22T MT8768T, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø23.8 (12.8-39.1)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22T MT8768T, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø34.8 (22.7-43.5)
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø29.4 (20.1-35.9)
Nokia T10 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø71.2 (36.7-79.1)
Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen) PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22T MT8768T, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø75.8 (13.3-83.9)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22T MT8768T, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø76.1 (48.6-80.9)
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø72.9 (34.2-84.6)

通信、软件和操作--更新承诺令人信服

WiFi 5是诺基亚T10中最快的WLAN标准。在我们用参考路由器华硕ROG Rapture AXE11000进行的测试中,该设备比同类设备要慢一些,但传输速率仍然非常稳定。

Android 12预装在平板电脑上,诺基亚承诺3年的每月安全更新和2个主要系统更新。事实上,在我们的测试时间,有很多更新。你必须单独安装所有的更新,而诺基亚并没有简单地合并所有旧的更新,这有点恼人。由于谷歌儿童空间的存在,这款平板电脑可以为小家伙们进行配置,使他们只能在一定的时间内使用,有害的内容被阻止。

该系统可以非常流畅地操作;我们在浏览菜单时没有发现任何停顿。然而,这款平板电脑在运行了很长时间后,需要时不时地彻底重启,因为它不能再完美无缺地操作。

诺基亚T10没有指纹传感器,但该平板电脑可以通过人脸进行生物识别解锁。这通过前置摄像头工作,没有额外的硬件,因此不是很安全。在日常使用中,解锁效果不错。屏幕的亮度通常足以准确和快速识别,即使是在完全黑暗的环境中。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
293 (287min - 299max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
342 (312min - 367max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
374 (360min - 392max) MBit/s +5%
Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
366 (351min - 381max) MBit/s +3%
Nokia T10
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
357 (333min - 367max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
349 (337min - 355max) MBit/s +15%
Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
315 (289min - 337max) MBit/s +4%
Nokia T10
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
304 (279min - 315max) MBit/s
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Nokia T10; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø304 (279-315)
Nokia T10; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø357 (333-367)

照相机 - 廉价平板电脑标准

前置摄像头的录制
前置摄像头的录制

你必须用背面的一个简单的800万像素摄像头来做。它不能拍摄非常详细的快照,但至少可以提供相当清晰的照片。在光线很暗和对比度很高的情况下,图片质量相当平庸,尤其是锐度明显下降,但提亮效果相当好。

在实验室里,在1勒克斯的照度下,没有什么能在照片中识别出来。另一方面,在良好的工作室照明下,测试图看起来不干净,彩色背景前的文字部分难以辨认。

视频可以在1080p和30 fps下进行。自动对焦的速度相当快,亮度调节也运作良好。整体图片质量一般,我们更推荐这款相机用于拍摄视频而不是图片。

一个小型的200万像素自拍相机位于屏幕上方的正面。然而,即使在良好的照明条件下,它也只能拍出相当冲淡和黑暗的照片。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera PlantMain camera EnvironmentMain camera Low Light
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
11 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
16 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
3 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
6 ∆E
10 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
4 ∆E
10 ∆E
ColorChecker Nokia T10: 8.07 ∆E min: 3.05 - max: 16.03 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
55.1 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
29 ∆E
65.1 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
31.4 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
76.8 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
42 ∆E
94.3 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Nokia T10: 47.19 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 94.34 ∆E

显示屏 - 诺基亚T10中没有PWM

子像素记录
子像素记录

诺基亚规定IPS屏幕的亮度为400cd/m²,典型分辨率为1280 x 800像素。根据我们用分光光度计的测量结果,制造商低估了这一点。我们测得的平均亮度为429cd/m²,这使诺基亚T10的屏幕处于一个非常高的水平。

耀眼的阳光可能仍然使它难以在户外阅读,但至少你不必在阴天逃到阴凉处才能阅读屏幕。照明也非常均匀,所以屏幕上没有明显的亮度差异。

不太令人印象深刻的是高黑值,这也导致了适度的对比度,因此色彩平淡。在我们用CalMAN软件进行的测量中,可以看到轻微的蓝色偏移,明亮的蓝色调也被渲染得相当不准确。

我们没有测量到PWM闪烁,因此该显示器也适用于敏感的用户。

424
cd/m²
426
cd/m²
419
cd/m²
426
cd/m²
446
cd/m²
422
cd/m²
429
cd/m²
437
cd/m²
429
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 446 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 428.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.52 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 446 cd/m²
Contrast: 686:1 (Black: 0.65 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.87 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
84.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.189
Nokia T10
IPS, 1280x800, 8"
Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen)
IPS, 1280x800, 8"
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
TFT, 1340x800, 8.7"
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
IPS, LCD, 1280x800, 8"
Response Times
-6%
-10%
19%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
39.8 ?(19.1, 20.7)
45.2 ?(23, 22.2)
-14%
52.8 ?(26, 26.8)
-33%
40.1 ?(22.6, 17.5)
-1%
Response Time Black / White *
32.2 ?(14.1, 18.1)
31.2 ?(13.7, 17.5)
3%
27.6 ?(14.4, 13.2)
14%
19.5 ?(13, 6.5)
39%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-19%
4%
15%
Brightness middle
446
353
-21%
360
-19%
388
-13%
Brightness
429
330
-23%
332
-23%
364
-15%
Brightness Distribution
94
81
-14%
85
-10%
90
-4%
Black Level *
0.65
0.64
2%
0.24
63%
0.36
45%
Contrast
686
552
-20%
1500
119%
1078
57%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.87
6.5
-33%
6.7
-38%
4.38
10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9.85
11.36
-15%
12.4
-26%
10.7
-9%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.7
7.3
-28%
7.6
-33%
2.9
49%
Gamma
2.189 101%
2.118 104%
2.33 94%
2.232 99%
CCT
7781 84%
8264 79%
8744 74%
6221 104%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-13% / -16%
-3% / 1%
17% / 16%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
32.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14.1 ms rise
↘ 18.1 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
39.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19.1 ms rise
↘ 20.7 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN颜色精度
卡尔曼色彩空间sRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间sRGB
卡尔曼饱和度
卡尔曼饱和度

性能、排放和电池寿命--为日常使用提供足够动力

淘宝网 统一通信T606作为SoC被证明是诺基亚的一个好选择。它比较老,但仍然比这个级别经常使用的联发科 P22T SoC的性能高得多。因此,诺基亚T10在日常使用中被证明反应更灵敏、更流畅。它不适合非常复杂的应用程序,但至少它提供了比同类设备更多一点的性能储备。

内存控制器也做得非常好,从缓慢的eMMC闪存中获得了相对较快的传输速率。

外壳上的最高温度为36.4°C(约98°F),在长时间的负载下是平均温度,而且只覆盖了一个小区域。正如3DMark压力测试所证明的那样,SoC在较长时间的负载中只显示出非常轻微的性能损失。

诺基亚T10配备了立体声扬声器,声音不大,但给听众带来了相当平衡的声音。aptX、aptX HD、SBC、AAC和LDAC是可用于无线音频连接的编解码器,通过耳机或可通过3.5毫米插孔或蓝牙连接的外部扬声器,声音变得更好。

在我们的WLAN测试中,诺基亚T10运行了984分钟或16:24小时。这是一个很好的结果,但考虑到5,250毫安时的充足电池,我们本可以期待更多。它绝对足够连续使用一天,而当平板电脑只用于偶尔冲浪时,几天也是可能的。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (140 - 1887, n=71, last 2 years)
707 Points +128%
Nokia T10
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
310 Points
Average Unisoc T7200
  (273 - 313, n=19)
306 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
172 Points -45%
Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen)
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
160 Points -48%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
MediaTek MT8169A, Mali-G52 MP2, 2048
Points -100%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (312 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)
2496 Points +99%
Nokia T10
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
1256 Points
Average Unisoc T7200
  (708 - 1324, n=19)
1206 Points -4%
Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen)
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
952 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
920 Points -27%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Tablet
  (3195 - 20841, n=73, last 2 years)
9812 Points +42%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (6637 - 8303, n=19)
7338 Points +6%
Nokia T10
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
6916 Points
Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen)
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
5221 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
5120 Points -26%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
MediaTek MT8169A, Mali-G52 MP2, 2048
5028 Points -27%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Average of class Tablet
  (361 - 14235, n=47, last 2 years)
2050 Points +114%
Nokia T10
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
957 Points
Average Unisoc T7200
  (361 - 974, n=18)
910 Points -5%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
MediaTek MT8169A, Mali-G52 MP2, 2048
836 Points -13%
Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen)
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
465 Points -51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Average of class Tablet
  (290 - 24605, n=47, last 2 years)
2176 Points +168%
Nokia T10
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
812 Points
Average Unisoc T7200
  (290 - 829, n=18)
772 Points -5%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
MediaTek MT8169A, Mali-G52 MP2, 2048
754 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
435 Points -46%
Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen)
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
393 Points -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Average of class Tablet
  (858 - 5751, n=47, last 2 years)
2796 Points +9%
Nokia T10
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
2560 Points
Average Unisoc T7200
  (2379 - 2577, n=18)
2499 Points -2%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
MediaTek MT8169A, Mali-G52 MP2, 2048
1732 Points -32%
Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen)
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1289 Points -50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
369 Points -86%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Average of class Tablet
  (267 - 17674, n=67, last 2 years)
4452 Points +356%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1166 Points +19%
Nokia T10
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
976 Points
Average Unisoc T7200
  (959 - 989, n=18)
975 Points 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
MediaTek MT8169A, Mali-G52 MP2, 2048
883 Points -10%
Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen)
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
534 Points -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet
  (240 - 29325, n=67, last 2 years)
5806 Points +603%
Nokia T10
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
826 Points
Average Unisoc T7200
  (814 - 834, n=18)
825 Points 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
MediaTek MT8169A, Mali-G52 MP2, 2048
784 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
516 Points -38%
Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen)
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
457 Points -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Average of class Tablet
  (441 - 7451, n=67, last 2 years)
3620 Points +35%
Nokia T10
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
2676 Points
Average Unisoc T7200
  (2484 - 2697, n=18)
2625 Points -2%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
MediaTek MT8169A, Mali-G52 MP2, 2048
1863 Points -30%
Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen)
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1295 Points -52%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
443 Points -83%
Wild Life Score
Average of class Tablet
  (286 - 7933, n=60, last 2 years)
1743 Points +323%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1215 Points +195%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (394 - 432, n=18)
416 Points +1%
Nokia T10
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
412 Points
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
MediaTek MT8169A, Mali-G52 MP2, 2048
Points -100%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average of class Tablet
  (289 - 32525, n=72, last 2 years)
4578 Points +1014%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (392 - 424, n=18)
413 Points 0%
Nokia T10
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
411 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
Points -100%
Wild Life Extreme
Average of class Tablet
  (75 - 8689, n=73, last 2 years)
1303 Points +1043%
Nokia T10
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
114 Points
Average Unisoc T7200
  (85 - 118, n=18)
107.3 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
Points -100%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Average of class Tablet
  (72 - 8889, n=71, last 2 years)
1543 Points +1303%
Nokia T10
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
110 Points
Average Unisoc T7200
  (99 - 121, n=15)
107.7 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
Points -100%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet
  (3 - 120, n=78, last 2 years)
26.9 fps +145%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
MediaTek MT8169A, Mali-G52 MP2, 2048
12 fps +9%
Nokia T10
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
11 fps
Average Unisoc T7200
  (5.1 - 11, n=18)
8.83 fps -20%
Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen)
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
8.1 fps -26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
7.9 fps -28%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet
  (2.5 - 340, n=78, last 2 years)
55 fps +900%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
MediaTek MT8169A, Mali-G52 MP2, 2048
7.7 fps +40%
Nokia T10
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
5.5 fps
Average Unisoc T7200
  (1.9 - 5.5, n=18)
5.22 fps -5%
Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen)
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4.2 fps -24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4 fps -27%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet
  (1.9 - 106.4, n=78, last 2 years)
18.6 fps +162%
Nokia T10
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
7.1 fps
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
MediaTek MT8169A, Mali-G52 MP2, 2048
6.6 fps -7%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (0.85 - 7.3, n=18)
5.34 fps -25%
Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen)
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
5.2 fps -27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
5 fps -30%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet
  (0.9 - 114.5, n=78, last 2 years)
21 fps +950%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
MediaTek MT8169A, Mali-G52 MP2, 2048
4.1 fps +105%
Nokia T10
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
2 fps
Average Unisoc T7200
  (0.85 - 2.1, n=18)
1.925 fps -4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1.5 fps -25%
Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen)
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1.5 fps -25%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet
  (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years)
28653 Points +190%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (2228 - 13455, n=14)
11332 Points +15%
Nokia T10
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
9871 Points
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
MediaTek MT8169A, Mali-G52 MP2, 2048
5843 Points -41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
5156 Points -48%
Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen)
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
5004 Points -49%
Nokia T10Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen)Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LiteAmazon Fire HD 8 2022Average 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-46%
-29%
-40%
-42%
217%
Sequential Read 256KB
273.5
262.1
-4%
271.1
-1%
270.37
-1%
Sequential Write 256KB
191.5
66.7
-65%
87.2
-54%
113.44
-41%
100.5 ?(14.8 - 196, n=247)
-48%
Random Read 4KB
71.4
50.8
-29%
60.8
-15%
39.46
-45%
Random Write 4KB
71.5
9.9
-86%
39.51
-45%
19.81
-72%
22.4 ?(0.75 - 91, n=247)
-69%

温度

Max. Load
 32.3 °C22.4 °C22.3 °C 
 32.7 °C22.9 °C23.1 °C 
 28.3 °C22.4 °C22.4 °C 
Maximum: 32.7 °C
Average: 25.4 °C
22.7 °C24.1 °C36.4 °C
23 °C23.8 °C36.1 °C
22.7 °C23.6 °C32.1 °C
Maximum: 36.4 °C
Average: 27.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  38.6 °C | Room Temperature 20.3 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 25.4 °C / 78 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.7 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.


热力图前线
热力图前线
热图背面
热图背面
3DMark - Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Nokia T10
96.8 (2.46min - 2.54max) %

Legend

 
Nokia T10 Unisoc T7200, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 32 GB eMMC Flash

演讲者

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.1342532.637.43127.428.84030.533.25034.138.86329.431.68019.921.81002220.712522.917.516014.221.82001127.225011.736.83158.542.84008.949.45009.452.363010.160.380016.568.810001471.8125015.467.4160010.566.2200010.766250011.366.8315011.968.1400012.967.2500013.562.7630014.255.180001558.11000015.760.81250016.459.61600017.351.3SPL25.578.2N0.738.6median 13.5median 59.6Delta2.713.837.536.43532.932.129.232.529.836.632.230.332.23121.225.726.625.631.123.936.719.741.117.4471952.616.858.417.862.917.862.222.664.522.665.72266.421.567.821.966.820.662.71763.916.265.615.468.31564.815.36515.870.316.574.717.466.331.778.51.542.4median 17.8median 64.52.97.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseNokia T10Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Nokia T10 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 84% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Nokia T10
5250 mAh
984 min
Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen)
5000 mAh
962 min -2%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
4850 mAh
935 min -5%
Average of class Tablet
  (319 - 1764, n=78, last 2 years)
816 min -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
5100 mAh
803 min -18%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
16h 24min

Pros

+ 屏幕明亮
+ 运行时间长
+ 更新承诺
+ 性能良好
+ 几乎没有发热
+ 相对较快的内存

Cons

- 塑料背面
- 相当重
- 相对较慢的无线网络
- 安静的扬声器
- 平庸的摄像头

结论 - 这款引人注目的平板电脑也可用于出租

审查中。诺基亚T10。测试设备由诺基亚德国公司提供。
审查中。诺基亚T10。测试设备由诺基亚德国公司提供。

诺基亚T10是一款方便的平板电脑,因此很适合年轻用户。纯粹的Android ,使用起来很有趣,明亮的屏幕使在更明亮的环境中使用成为可能。较长的运行时间也允许在家庭之外使用,强大的SoC使流畅的操作成为可能。

相机与其他廉价平板电脑相当,所以你最多只能用它们来拍快照。对于这样一个廉价的设备来说,非典型的是更新承诺,到目前为止,每月有1-2次安全更新,保持得相当好。

Wi-Fi模块可以更快一点,当然也有更轻的8英寸平板电脑,有更高质量的金属底盘,但诺基亚管理的整体包装很全面。

如果你正在寻找一款运行时间长的方便的平板电脑,你会在诺基亚的T10中得到一个好的设备。如果你愿意,你甚至可以通过订阅来获得它。

联想 联想Tab M8更加轻便,LTE版本的平板电脑甚至可以用来打电话。你可以用以下产品来省钱 亚马逊Fire HD 8,但你必须接受低下的性能和有限的软件。

价格和可用性

在测试时,诺基亚T10的价格是169欧元(约合人民币186元),,直接从制造商那里购买。但你也可以以每月12欧元(约合13美元)的价格订阅它。那些喜欢 amazon.de也可以订购WiFi版本的平板电脑,价格约为170欧元(约187美元)。

LTE版本可在cyberport.de,价格为206欧元(约合人民币227元)。(~$227).

Nokia T10 - 02/01/2023 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
79 / 98 → 81%
Keyboard
65 / 80 → 82%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
34 / 70 → 49%
Weight
85 / 40-88 → 94%
Battery
91%
Display
82%
Games Performance
13 / 78 → 17%
Application Performance
60 / 92 → 65%
Temperature
96%
Noise
100%
Audio
66 / 91 → 72%
Camera
41 / 85 → 48%
Average
70%
82%
Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 诺基亚T10平板电脑评测--有更新承诺的便捷平板电脑
Florian Schmitt, 2023-02- 3 (Update: 2023-02- 3)