Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar诺基亚T10平板电脑评测--有更新承诺的便捷平板电脑
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 82.2 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2023 | Nokia T10 T606, Mali-G57 MP1 | 375 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 8.00" | 1280x800 | |
| 80.8 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2023 | Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen) Helio P22T MT8768T, PowerVR GE8320 | 305 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 8.00" | 1280x800 | |
| 79.7 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite Helio P22T MT8768T, PowerVR GE8320 | 366 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 8.70" | 1340x800 | |
| 80.4 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2023 | Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 MT8169A, Mali-G52 MP2 | 337 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 8.00" | 1280x800 |
外壳和功能 - 漂亮的塑料后盖
诺基亚T10的8英寸规格完全适合小孩子的手，但你也可以根据要求获得带有LTE的设备，并将其作为导航系统或用于商务旅行。
这是一款真正的全能型手机，它只有一个塑料背面，但它是一种别致的深绿色，带有条纹图案。虽然它看起来不错，但你会发现其稳定性只能算是一般。在强大的压力或扭动下，平板电脑会悄然开裂，液晶显示屏上的图像错误也会显现。
绝对有比诺基亚T10更轻巧、更方便的平板电脑，如 联想Tab M8例如，联想Tab M8的重量要轻70克（约2.8盎司）。
Wi-Fi版本只有3GB的内存和32GB的大容量存储。LTE版本也有4GB/64GB。有限的存储空间可以通过microSD卡扩展。在我们用Angelbird V60参考卡进行的测试中，证明读卡器总体上非常快，但也不时出现读取率强烈下降的情况。
这款手机有一个第二屏幕功能，可以通过Wi-Fi将平板电脑连接到PC上，从而获得一个带有触摸功能的额外屏幕。遗憾的是，NFC不可用，所以不能使用移动支付服务。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Average of class Tablet (7.61 - 101.6, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Nokia T10 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen) (Angelbird V60) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信、软件和操作--更新承诺令人信服
WiFi 5是诺基亚T10中最快的WLAN标准。在我们用参考路由器华硕ROG Rapture AXE11000进行的测试中，该设备比同类设备要慢一些，但传输速率仍然非常稳定。
Android 12预装在平板电脑上，诺基亚承诺3年的每月安全更新和2个主要系统更新。事实上，在我们的测试时间，有很多更新。你必须单独安装所有的更新，而诺基亚并没有简单地合并所有旧的更新，这有点恼人。由于谷歌儿童空间的存在，这款平板电脑可以为小家伙们进行配置，使他们只能在一定的时间内使用，有害的内容被阻止。
该系统可以非常流畅地操作；我们在浏览菜单时没有发现任何停顿。然而，这款平板电脑在运行了很长时间后，需要时不时地彻底重启，因为它不能再完美无缺地操作。
诺基亚T10没有指纹传感器，但该平板电脑可以通过人脸进行生物识别解锁。这通过前置摄像头工作，没有额外的硬件，因此不是很安全。在日常使用中，解锁效果不错。屏幕的亮度通常足以准确和快速识别，即使是在完全黑暗的环境中。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen) | |
| Nokia T10 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen) | |
| Nokia T10 | |
照相机 - 廉价平板电脑标准
你必须用背面的一个简单的800万像素摄像头来做。它不能拍摄非常详细的快照，但至少可以提供相当清晰的照片。在光线很暗和对比度很高的情况下，图片质量相当平庸，尤其是锐度明显下降，但提亮效果相当好。
在实验室里，在1勒克斯的照度下，没有什么能在照片中识别出来。另一方面，在良好的工作室照明下，测试图看起来不干净，彩色背景前的文字部分难以辨认。
视频可以在1080p和30 fps下进行。自动对焦的速度相当快，亮度调节也运作良好。整体图片质量一般，我们更推荐这款相机用于拍摄视频而不是图片。
一个小型的200万像素自拍相机位于屏幕上方的正面。然而，即使在良好的照明条件下，它也只能拍出相当冲淡和黑暗的照片。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera PlantMain camera EnvironmentMain camera Low Light
显示屏 - 诺基亚T10中没有PWM
诺基亚规定IPS屏幕的亮度为400cd/m²，典型分辨率为1280 x 800像素。根据我们用分光光度计的测量结果，制造商低估了这一点。我们测得的平均亮度为429cd/m²，这使诺基亚T10的屏幕处于一个非常高的水平。
耀眼的阳光可能仍然使它难以在户外阅读，但至少你不必在阴天逃到阴凉处才能阅读屏幕。照明也非常均匀，所以屏幕上没有明显的亮度差异。
不太令人印象深刻的是高黑值，这也导致了适度的对比度，因此色彩平淡。在我们用CalMAN软件进行的测量中，可以看到轻微的蓝色偏移，明亮的蓝色调也被渲染得相当不准确。
我们没有测量到PWM闪烁，因此该显示器也适用于敏感的用户。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 446 cd/m²
Contrast: 686:1 (Black: 0.65 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.87 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 5.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
84.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.189
| Nokia T10 IPS, 1280x800, 8" | Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen) IPS, 1280x800, 8" | Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite TFT, 1340x800, 8.7" | Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 IPS, LCD, 1280x800, 8" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | -6% | -10% | 19% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 39.8 ? | 45.2 ? -14% | 52.8 ? -33% | 40.1 ? -1% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 32.2 ? | 31.2 ? 3% | 27.6 ? 14% | 19.5 ? 39% |
| PWM Frequency | ||||
| Screen | -19% | 4% | 15% | |
| Brightness middle | 446 | 353 -21% | 360 -19% | 388 -13% |
| Brightness | 429 | 330 -23% | 332 -23% | 364 -15% |
| Brightness Distribution | 94 | 81 -14% | 85 -10% | 90 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.65 | 0.64 2% | 0.24 63% | 0.36 45% |
| Contrast | 686 | 552 -20% | 1500 119% | 1078 57% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.87 | 6.5 -33% | 6.7 -38% | 4.38 10% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.85 | 11.36 -15% | 12.4 -26% | 10.7 -9% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.7 | 7.3 -28% | 7.6 -33% | 2.9 49% |
| Gamma | 2.189 101% | 2.118 104% | 2.33 94% | 2.232 99% |
| CCT | 7781 84% | 8264 79% | 8744 74% | 6221 104% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -13% /
-16% | -3% /
1% | 17% /
16% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 32.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.1 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18.1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 39.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.1 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 20.7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能、排放和电池寿命--为日常使用提供足够动力
淘宝网 统一通信T606作为SoC被证明是诺基亚的一个好选择。它比较老，但仍然比这个级别经常使用的联发科 P22T SoC的性能高得多。因此，诺基亚T10在日常使用中被证明反应更灵敏、更流畅。它不适合非常复杂的应用程序，但至少它提供了比同类设备更多一点的性能储备。
内存控制器也做得非常好，从缓慢的eMMC闪存中获得了相对较快的传输速率。
外壳上的最高温度为36.4°C（约98°F），在长时间的负载下是平均温度，而且只覆盖了一个小区域。正如3DMark压力测试所证明的那样，SoC在较长时间的负载中只显示出非常轻微的性能损失。
诺基亚T10配备了立体声扬声器，声音不大，但给听众带来了相当平衡的声音。aptX、aptX HD、SBC、AAC和LDAC是可用于无线音频连接的编解码器，通过耳机或可通过3.5毫米插孔或蓝牙连接的外部扬声器，声音变得更好。
在我们的WLAN测试中，诺基亚T10运行了984分钟或16：24小时。这是一个很好的结果，但考虑到5,250毫安时的充足电池，我们本可以期待更多。它绝对足够连续使用一天，而当平板电脑只用于偶尔冲浪时，几天也是可能的。
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
| Average of class Tablet (3 - 120, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 | |
| Nokia T10 | |
| Average UNISOC T606 (5.1 - 11, n=18) | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite | |
| 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
| Average of class Tablet (2.5 - 340, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 | |
| Nokia T10 | |
| Average UNISOC T606 (1.9 - 5.5, n=18) | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
| Average of class Tablet (1.9 - 106.4, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Nokia T10 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 | |
| Average UNISOC T606 (0.85 - 7.3, n=18) | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite | |
| 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Average of class Tablet (0.9 - 114.5, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 | |
| Nokia T10 | |
| Average UNISOC T606 (0.85 - 2.1, n=18) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen) | |
| Nokia T10 | Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen) | Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite | Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 | Average 32 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -46% | -29% | -40% | -42% | 199% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 273.5 | 262.1 -4% | 271.1 -1% | 270.37 -1% | 242 ? -12% | 957 ? 250% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 191.5 | 66.7 -65% | 87.2 -54% | 113.44 -41% | 100.5 ? -48% | 646 ? 237% |
| Random Read 4KB | 71.4 | 50.8 -29% | 60.8 -15% | 39.46 -45% | 43.2 ? -39% | 185.8 ? 160% |
| Random Write 4KB | 71.5 | 9.9 -86% | 39.51 -45% | 19.81 -72% | 22.4 ? -69% | 178.1 ? 149% |
温度
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.7 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
| 3DMark - Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Nokia T10 | |
演讲者
Nokia T10 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 84% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| Nokia T10 | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 | |
| Average of class Tablet (319 - 1764, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite | |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 这款引人注目的平板电脑也可用于出租
诺基亚T10是一款方便的平板电脑，因此很适合年轻用户。纯粹的Android ，使用起来很有趣，明亮的屏幕使在更明亮的环境中使用成为可能。较长的运行时间也允许在家庭之外使用，强大的SoC使流畅的操作成为可能。
相机与其他廉价平板电脑相当，所以你最多只能用它们来拍快照。对于这样一个廉价的设备来说，非典型的是更新承诺，到目前为止，每月有1-2次安全更新，保持得相当好。
Wi-Fi模块可以更快一点，当然也有更轻的8英寸平板电脑，有更高质量的金属底盘，但诺基亚管理的整体包装很全面。
如果你正在寻找一款运行时间长的方便的平板电脑，你会在诺基亚的T10中得到一个好的设备。如果你愿意，你甚至可以通过订阅来获得它。
联想 联想Tab M8更加轻便，LTE版本的平板电脑甚至可以用来打电话。你可以用以下产品来省钱 亚马逊Fire HD 8，但你必须接受低下的性能和有限的软件。
价格和可用性
在测试时，诺基亚T10的价格是169欧元（约合人民币186元），，直接从制造商那里购买。但你也可以以每月12欧元（约合13美元）的价格订阅它。那些喜欢 amazon.de也可以订购WiFi版本的平板电脑，价格约为170欧元（约187美元）。
LTE版本可在cyberport.de，价格为206欧元（约合人民币227元）。(~$227).
Nokia T10
-
02/01/2023 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
