Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
MagyarTeclast M50 评测 - 带有移动互联网、电话功能和大量存储空间的平板电脑
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Storage | Size | Resolution | Price from |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 79.3 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | Teclast M50 T606, Mali-G57 MP1 | 460 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 10.10" | 1280x800 | |
| 84.1 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2 | 332 g | 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 8.70" | 1340x800 | |
| 80.4 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2024 | Blackview Tab 80 T606, Mali-G57 MP1 | 484 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 10.10" | 1280x800 | |
| 75.2 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | Teclast P26T A523, Mali-G57 MP1 | 511 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 10.10" | 1280x800 |
外壳和连接性 - 带有弱点的金属外壳
Teclast M50 的金属外壳边缘经过抛光处理，看起来很不错，与稍贵一些的平板电脑相比也毫不逊色。不过，平板电脑不宜过度扭曲或按压，否则会在屏幕液晶上形成微小的压痕，屏幕单元和后盖也会轻微移位并开裂。平板电脑重 460 克，易于握持，既不会太重也不会太轻。
屏幕周围的边框足够纤薄，使平板电脑看起来相当现代，而且还能防止你经常误触触摸屏。
这款平板电脑配备了 6GB RAM 和 128GB 大容量存储空间，因此，如果你喜欢同时运行多个应用程序并在平板电脑上存储大量数据，那么这款设备一定能满足你的需求。它配备了用于音频设备的 3.5 毫米插孔和 2 个 SIM 卡插槽。但不支持 eSIM 卡。
如果你想使用 microSD 卡扩展平板电脑的存储空间，你将不得不放弃两个 SIM 卡插槽中的一个。如果您想在外置存储卡上存储数据，您可以期待平均的数据传输速率，我们使用 Angelbird V60 作为参考卡进行的测试证实了这一点。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Tablet (7.61 - 101.6, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Teclast M50 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Blackview Tab 80 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Teclast P26T (Angelbird V60) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信、软件和操作 - 稳定的无线局域网
作为平板电脑最快的无线局域网标准，支持 WiFi 5。对于一款价格低廉的平板电脑来说，数据传输速率大约为 300 - 350 MBit/s。这足以充分利用许多互联网连接；平板电脑的传输速率太慢，无法使用千兆线路。
您也可以使用蜂窝连接上网；在中欧地区，所有必要的频率都可以使用，这也是本次测试的进行地。不过，如果你经常出差，就需要提前研究一下能否在目的地国家访问网络，因为那里不支持那么多的 LTE 频段。
尽管 Teclast 宣称该平板电脑支持Android 14：但Android 13 仍安装在我们的测试设备上，无法更新。鉴于其过时的安全补丁（测试时为 2023 年 9 月），更新也是必要的。
支持 Widevine L1，因此可以通过所有主要平台观看高清流媒体内容。
触摸屏可以精确操作到边边角角。虽然没有指纹传感器，但可以通过前置摄像头进行面部识别。这在黑暗环境中也能正常工作，因为屏幕提供了足够的识别光线。平板电脑解锁迅速而准确。不过，由于该系统只能扫描二维图像，因此存在一定的陌生人欺骗系统的风险。
| Networking | |
| Teclast M50 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Blackview Tab 80 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Teclast P26T | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
摄像头 - 更多的应急解决方案
平板电脑的主摄像头采用 1300 万像素传感器。拍摄出来的图像动态感不强，要么非常亮且曝光过度，要么非常暗且细节很少。摄像头的总体图像清晰度也很差。
在光线非常暗的情况下，你不得不忍受较差的图像表现，甚至是全黑的图像。
这款相机可以在正常光线条件下拍摄快照，当然也可以用于扫描二维码或记录情况。不过，摄影爱好者很难对图像感到满意。
喜欢录制动态图像的用户可以高达 1,080p 和 30fps 的速度进行录制。不过，平板电脑的亮度调节和自动对焦响应速度相当慢，即使在光线稍差的情况下，图像噪点也清晰可见。
设备正面还有一个 500 万像素的自拍摄像头。拍出来的照片还可以，但不应该放大，否则你会看到很多模糊的区域和非常模糊的细节。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera plantMain camera surroundingsMain camera low light
显示屏 - 分辨率较低，但亮度尚可
在这个价位的平板电脑中，很少能找到超过 1280 x 800 像素的屏幕。即使是 Teclast M50 的 10.1 英寸屏幕也无法提供更多。它的最大亮度平均为 369 cd/m²，虽然还算不错，但还不如 三星Galaxy Tab A9和 Blackview Tab 80.
由于黑度较高，屏幕的对比度很低，屏幕上显示的内容有时会显得有些暗淡。总的来说，屏幕上的内容偏蓝，色彩描绘不够准确。
我们没有测量到任何 PWM，因此即使是敏感的人使用这款平板电脑也不会有任何问题。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 371 cd/m²
Contrast: 824:1 (Black: 0.45 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.46 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 7.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
79.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.055
| Teclast M50 IPS, 1280x800, 10.1" | Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 LCD TFT, 1340x800, 8.7" | Blackview Tab 80 LCD, 1280x800, 10.1" | Teclast P26T IPS, 1280x800, 10.1" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | -10% | 36% | 4% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 69 ? | 52.61 ? 24% | 32.8 ? 52% | 60.2 ? 13% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 24.2 ? | 34.71 ? -43% | 19.5 ? 19% | 25.7 ? -6% |
| PWM Frequency | ||||
| Screen | 29% | 25% | -19% | |
| Brightness middle | 371 | 486 31% | 425 15% | 248 -33% |
| Brightness | 369 | 462 25% | 423 15% | 236 -36% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 92 6% | 83 -5% | 81 -7% |
| Black Level * | 0.45 | 0.35 22% | 0.4 11% | 0.4 11% |
| Contrast | 824 | 1389 69% | 1063 29% | 620 -25% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 7.46 | 6.2 17% | 5.11 32% | 8.62 -16% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 16.5 | 10.4 37% | 9.8 41% | 17.81 -8% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.4 | 5.7 23% | 2.8 62% | 10.1 -36% |
| Gamma | 2.055 107% | 2.12 104% | 2.183 101% | 2.438 90% |
| CCT | 8423 77% | 7911 82% | 7136 91% | 10183 64% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 10% /
21% | 31% /
27% | -8% /
-14% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 53 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 69 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 40.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 28.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能、排放和电池寿命 - 适合日常使用
产品 Unisoc T606Teclast 经常使用它，在该制造商的许多其他平板电脑中也能找到它的身影。不过，即使对于这个价位的产品来说，它的速度也只是刚刚够用。同时打开多个应用程序、执行更复杂的任务或在较大的计算过程中调整音量往往会给平板电脑带来挑战。
在网上冲浪时，Teclast 设备的速度被证明是相当快的。不过，在大型网站上浏览图片往往需要等待较长时间。
如果你只执行简单的任务，那么这款平板电脑的速度足以满足日常使用。不过，Teclast 本可以在存储方面多下功夫：事实证明，这款平板电脑的 eMMC 闪存非常慢，在加载时间和数据传输方面是个瓶颈。
该平板电脑的外壳仅有轻微发热，这意味着用户即使长时间使用也不会感觉到发热。平板电脑的性能也不会因此受到影响，3DMark 压力测试就证明了这一点。
Teclast M50 的两侧各有一个扬声器，因此可以实现立体声音效。在最大音量下，扬声器听起来高音很重，但如果稍稍降低音量，声音就会变得更加饱满。对于较小的房间，音量也完全足够。支持无线声音传输所需的所有蓝牙音频编解码器，甚至还有一些高保真音频选项，如 aptX HD 和 LDAC。如果您喜欢连接有线耳机，可以使用平板电脑的 3.5 毫米音频插孔。
该设备的电池平均容量为 6,000 mAh。因此，我们的测试设备在无线局域网测试中持续了 12:22 小时。在日常生活中，这意味着你通常可以在家里的客厅用平板电脑度过雨天，而无需充电。如果您确实需要补充电量，平板电脑也需要一些时间：因为最多只能使用 10 瓦的充电功率，所以电池需要 4 个小时才能再次充满电。
| PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 | |
| Average of class Tablet (3195 - 20841, n=71, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 | |
| Teclast M50 | |
| Average UNISOC T606 (6637 - 8303, n=19) | |
| Blackview Tab 80 | |
| Teclast P26T | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
| Average of class Tablet (3 - 120, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 | |
| Teclast P26T | |
| Blackview Tab 80 | |
| Teclast M50 | |
| Average UNISOC T606 (5.1 - 11, n=18) | |
| 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
| Average of class Tablet (2.5 - 340, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 | |
| Teclast P26T | |
| Teclast M50 | |
| Blackview Tab 80 | |
| Average UNISOC T606 (1.9 - 5.5, n=18) | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
| Average of class Tablet (1.9 - 106.4, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 | |
| Teclast P26T | |
| Teclast M50 | |
| Blackview Tab 80 | |
| Average UNISOC T606 (0.85 - 7.3, n=18) | |
| 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Average of class Tablet (0.9 - 114.5, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 | |
| Teclast P26T | |
| Blackview Tab 80 | |
| Teclast M50 | |
| Average UNISOC T606 (0.85 - 2.1, n=18) | |
| 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Average of class Tablet (0.4 - 55.1, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 | |
| Average UNISOC T606 (0.8 - 6.6, n=14) | |
| Teclast P26T | |
| Blackview Tab 80 | |
| Teclast M50 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 | |
| Teclast M50 | |
| Blackview Tab 80 | |
| Average UNISOC T606 (2228 - 13455, n=14) | |
| Teclast P26T | |
| Teclast M50 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 | Blackview Tab 80 | Teclast P26T | Average 128 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 153% | 7% | -33% | 3% | 210% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 269.9 | 916.45 240% | 266.71 -1% | 237.62 -12% | 283 ? 5% | 957 ? 255% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 196 | 398.32 103% | 235.98 20% | 137.55 -30% | 194.6 ? -1% | 646 ? 230% |
| Random Read 4KB | 69.6 | 182.74 163% | 65.11 -6% | 63.08 -9% | 82.7 ? 19% | 185.8 ? 167% |
| Random Write 4KB | 62.3 | 128.92 107% | 70.74 14% | 11.69 -81% | 55.1 ? -12% | 178.1 ? 186% |
温度
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.7 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
3DMark Wild Life Stress Test
发言人
Teclast M50 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Teclast P26T audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
运行时间
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| Blackview Tab 80 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 | |
| Average of class Tablet (319 - 1764, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Teclast M50 | |
| Teclast P26T | |
Pros
Cons
评价 - 亮点不多，总体不错
事实上，Teclast M50 是同价位产品中相当典型的代表：你不能指望它有多高的性能，它的摄像头充其量只适合拍摄快照或二维码，屏幕分辨率也不高。虽然它的金属外壳很时尚，但它还可以更稳定一些，软件也可以再更新一下。
不过，Teclast 还是为其经济实惠的平板电脑带来了一些亮点：128GB 的大容量存储空间和 6GB 的 RAM 对于需要大量内存的用户来说是个不错的选择。此外，它还可以通过两张 SIM 卡使用蜂窝数据和拨打电话。
机身发热量适中，电池续航时间适合日常使用，而且由于采用了 Widevine L1 技术，在欣赏高清流媒体内容时没有任何障碍。受屏幕闪烁困扰的用户也会对其无 PWM 显示屏感到满意。
如果您不期待任何高端功能，那么价格实惠的 Teclast M50 一定会让您满意。最后，这款平板电脑拥有充足的存储空间、良好的运行时间和蜂窝数据支持。
该设备的替代品是 Teclast M50 HD如果您一定需要全高清屏幕的话。三星 三星Galaxy Tab A9的显示屏稍小，但性能更好。
价格和供应情况
您可以在亚马逊店面查看 Teclast 的所有平板电脑。
Teclast M50
-
04/16/2024 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
