Teclast M50 高清平板电脑评测--这款平板电脑价格实惠、重量轻、设备齐全

Name: Teclast M50 HD
Brand: Teclast

几乎随时随地上网

Teclast M50 HD 的售价仅为 190 欧元（美国为 160 美元），但在一些促销活动中也能以更低的价格买到。您可以获得大量存储空间和双 SIM 卡插槽，还可以在路上上网或打电话。尽管性能欠佳，它是否仍然划算？

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 01/03/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Tablet

对于价格在 200 欧元（约合 219 美元）以下的平板电脑，你不能抱太高的期望：它通常采用价格低廉的 SoC，但性能却相当低，存储速度慢，而且通常也相对有限，尤其是摄像头往往还有待改进。

Teclast M50 HD 希望至少在某些方面做得更好。从纸面上看，128 GB 的充足存储空间和 8 GB 内存以及移动通信调制解调器听起来很有前途。但在这一点上，这款 10.1 英寸的小巧平板电脑还必须面对一些强大的竞争对手，比如三星或联想的一些价格实惠的带 LTE 的平板电脑。

我们将在测试中仔细研究 Teclast 平板电脑，并告诉您是否值得购买。

Test device courtesy of Teclast Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Teclast M50 HD

Processor

Unisoc T7200 8 x 1.6 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G57 MP1

Memory

8 GB

Display

10.10 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 224 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz

Storage

128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB

, 115 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio port, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB (shared), Sensors: gravity, light, hall sensor

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B5/B8), 4G (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8 x 238.4 x 157.7

Battery

6000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 10 watt charging

Operating System

Android 13

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix LED flash
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: stereo speakers, charger, USB cable, SIM tool, 12 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

435 g

Price

190 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
79.4 % v7 ^(old)	01 / 2024	Teclast M50 HD T7200, Mali-G57 MP1	435 g	8 mm	10.10"	1920x1200
79.9 % v7 ^(old)	10 / 2023	Teclast M50 Pro T7255, Mali-G57 MP1	435 g	7.9 mm	10.10"	1920x1200
81.2 % v7 ^(old)	05 / 2023	Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 T618, Mali-G52 MP2	477 g	7 mm	10.40"	2000x1200
80 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2023	Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 T610, Mali-G52 MP2	460 g	8.5 mm	10.10"	1920x1200
81.5 % v7 ^(old)	09 / 2023	Telekom T Tablet Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2	490 g	7.8 mm	10.40"	2000x1200

外壳 - 重量轻的金属外壳

亮蓝色的外壳由金属制成。顶部有一条相当宽的塑料条，用于改善天线接收效果。外壳边缘采用倒角设计，不仅美观大方，而且还改善了平板电脑的人体工学设计，使其手感舒适。

显示屏与外壳边框贴合得非常整齐。不过，即使在几个地方施加轻微的压力，也会导致屏幕的液晶发生反应。当试图翘起平板电脑时，感觉有些部件在相互移动，平板电脑还会发出一些吱吱的声音。总体而言，质量给人的印象还不错，尤其是考虑到其价格档次。

Teclast M50 HD 的重量为 435 克（约 15.3 盎司），是一款相当轻巧的 10.1 英寸平板电脑，可以轻松地长时间握在手中而不会感到疲劳。

尺寸比较

Telekom T Tablet Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Teclast M50 HD Teclast M50 Pro DIN A5 ❌

设备 - Teclast 平板电脑中的大量数据空间

如上所述，该机的存储设备令人信服，拥有 128 GB 数据存储空间和 8 GB 内存。制造商甚至提到了 16GB 工作内存，但这只能通过交换数据存储中的文件来实现，其响应速度明显慢于专用内存。因此，这更像是一种应急解决方案，在日常操作中几乎不会带来任何好处，因为 8 GB 内存无论如何都能轻松满足大多数任务的需要。

USB-C 端口用于充电和数据传输。它采用 USB 2.0 标准进行内部连接。还有一个独立的 3.5-mm 音频接口，即使是老式耳机也能轻松连接，无需使用任何适配器。

Teclast M50 HD 不提供用于无线支付的 NFC 功能。

右侧有一个插槽，可接受两张 SIM 卡或一张 SIM 卡和一张 microSD 卡。

右：microSD/SIM 卡插槽、扬声器、USB-C 接口、3.5 毫米音频接口

microSD 读卡器

我们使用 Angelbird V60 参考 microSD 卡对读卡器进行了测试。插入卡后，我们将其中的 250 张照片复制到内部存储空间。Teclast M50 HD 的表现相当出色，在同价位产品中达到了 35.2 MB/s 的快速传输速率。不过，该读卡器还无法达到 microSD 卡的最高性能。

该读卡器在 CPDT 基准测试中的速度也相当快，因此您也可以放心地将数据转移到 microSD 上。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)	35.2 MB/s
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)	27.6 MB/s -22%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)	21.3 MB/s -39%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)	20.9 MB/s -41%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	17.02 MB/s -52%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38.1 (30.7-46.7)

Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø26.6 (11.8-45.4)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø34.5 (12.9-44.1)

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø34 (17.4-45.3)

Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø39.5 (25.2-50.5)

Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø75.2 (41.4-81.8)

Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø73.6 (41.9-85.8)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø73.6 (44.2-82)

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø71.3 (43.6-81.3)

Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø68.7 (14-80.3)

软件 - PureAndroid 13

Teclast 在平板电脑上安装了Android 13，幸好没有添加任何第三方厂商的广告应用程序，因此用户仍有很大的存储空间，可以安装自己喜欢的应用程序。制造商也没有修改用户界面，因此用户应该很容易找到方向。

在我们测试时，安全补丁来自 2023 年 9 月，这意味着它们已经有点过时了。即使在我们提出要求后，制造商也没有给出更新周期的具体说明，只是承诺该平板电脑仍将在几年内不定期获得软件更新。

据 Teclast 称，至少在接下来的几个月里，应该会有一份包含所有设备和更新周期的清单。不过，你现在不应该期待太频繁的补丁或新功能。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 在路上也能上网

在无线局域网方面，Teclast M50 HD 使用 WiFi 5 作为最快的标准，在我们的测试中达到了不错的传输速率，整体上达到了同类产品的水平，并保持相对稳定。我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture AXE 11000 参考路由器测试传输速率。

在靠近路由器的地方，网站加载速度相当快，我们只需不时等待图片。在 10 米的距离和三面墙的阻隔下，仍有 3/4 的信号强度可用，但网页加载速度的差异已经非常明显。

非常棒的是，您还可以使用两张 SIM 卡访问移动互联网。最大连接速度为 LTE 标准。

那些打算在其他国家使用该平板电脑进行移动通信的用户应该提前了解所需的频段，因为 Teclast M50 HD 在德国只支持最必要的频段。移动调制解调器支持的频段列表请参见上面的规格说明。

在为期两周的测试期间，我们进行了一些现场检查，发现信号强度始终很好，尽管从未达到在同一地点试用的高端智能手机的水平。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Telekom T Tablet	371 (365^min - 371^max) MBit/s +22%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	319 (310^min - 325^max) MBit/s +5%
Teclast M50 Pro	319 (259^min - 336^max) MBit/s +5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	317 (251^min - 326^max) MBit/s +4%
Teclast M50 HD	305 (259^min - 319^max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Telekom T Tablet	372 (358^min - 381^max) MBit/s +4%
Teclast M50 Pro	358 (316^min - 374^max) MBit/s 0%
Teclast M50 HD	358 (336^min - 370^max) MBit/s
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	351 (333^min - 366^max) MBit/s -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	218 (172^min - 258^max) MBit/s -39%

Teclast M50 HD; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø305 (259-319)

Teclast M50 HD; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø358 (336-370)

我们来仔细看看这款平板电脑的定位功能：平板电脑支持所有大型卫星网络，如果你走出户外，经过几秒钟的等待，平板电脑的定位精度可达 5 米（约 16 英尺）。

为了进一步评估其性能，我们还进行了一次实际测试，将 Teclast M50 HD 和 Garmin Venu 2 智能手表放在一起进行自行车旅行对比。之后，我们再比较它们记录的路线。

遗憾的是，Teclast 平板电脑并不十分称职。有时，它把我们安排在完全不同的道路上，让我们穿过花园和房屋，最后还把我们安排在桥边的水里。

有鉴于此，我们不建议使用该平板电脑进行导航，只有在您只需要知道大致位置时，才能确定您的位置。

相机 - 几乎无法使用

由于 Teclast M50 HD 是一款经济实惠的平板电脑，你不应该对它的摄像头抱有太高的期望，因为制造商认为相对较大的设备在路上拍照的时候会比较少。这就为通过使用更实惠的部件来降低设备价格提供了可能。

因此，Teclast M50 HD 也只在背面使用了一个相当简单的 1300 万像素镜头。用它在户外拍摄的照片显示出很强的色调，在非常明亮或黑暗的地方只有很少的清晰度。部分细节显得模糊不清，较大的区域则出现斑点。

在弱光条件下，该相机也缺乏图像清晰度，并且再次出现强烈的色调。因此，我们并不推荐使用该款相机拍照，即使是文件扫描也会经常出现相当模糊的情况。因此，这款相机主要只适合读取二维码。

可以 30 帧/秒的全高清分辨率录制视频，但视频质量也很差，色调很重，清晰度也很低。

即使在光线良好的条件下，前置摄像头也很模糊。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera: plant Main camera: surroundings Main camera: low light

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

在我们的测试实验室中，我们给了主摄像头另一个表现更好的机会，但它也没有成功：在非常好的工作室光线下，拍摄出来的照片再次变得非常模糊。在仅有 1 Lux 的光线下，照片中的任何东西都无法辨认。

ColorChecker Teclast M50 HD: 9.54 ∆E min: 0.59 - max: 18.97 ∆E

配件和保修 - 保修期较短

除平板电脑外，包装盒内还包括一个 10 瓦的充电器、一条 USB 数据线和一个打开侧面 SIM 卡槽的工具。制造商还为平板电脑提供了一个对开式保护套，价格为 15 欧元（约合 16 美元），相当实惠。

Teclast 只提供 12 个月的保修期，否则将参照供应商的保修期（在德国）。

输入设备和操作 - 无指纹传感器

触摸屏的扫描频率为 120 赫兹，因此每秒要检查 120 次触摸输入。它能可靠地响应我们的输入，大多数时候也没有延迟，但仍然感觉不如扫描速率更高的屏幕那样流畅。触摸屏对边角输入也有反应。

这款经济实惠的平板电脑没有配备指纹传感器，唯一的生物识别安全选项是通过前置摄像头进行人脸识别。训练和识别过程快速可靠，平板电脑可以顺利解锁。

▶ load Youtube video

显示屏 - 高分辨率，但颜色较暗

10.1 英寸 IPS 屏幕的分辨率为 1,920 x 1,200 像素，在同类产品中并不算亮：246 cd/m² 已是极限。因此，这款平板电脑更适合在室内使用。在室外，周围环境的反光太强，显示屏上几乎什么都看不清。

对比度也相应较低，色彩显得非常暗淡。即使在非常低的亮度设置下，也不会使用 PWM，因此即使是敏感的人也可以使用这款平板电脑。


226 cd/m²	238 cd/m²	219 cd/m²
216 cd/m²	246 cd/m²	222 cd/m²
216 cd/m²	230 cd/m²	228 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 246 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 226.8 cd/m² Minimum: 9.3 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 246 cd/m²
Contrast: 745:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.28 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 8.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
70% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.277

	Teclast M50 HD IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1"	Teclast M50 Pro IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1"	Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 IPS, 2000x1200, 10.4"	Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1"	Telekom T Tablet TFT-LCD, 2000x1200, 10.4"
Screen		20%	7%	23%	14%
Brightness middle	246	248 1%	322 31%	343 39%	529 115%
Brightness	227	234 3%	303 33%	332 46%	486 114%
Brightness Distribution	88	86 -2%	89 1%	94 7%	87 -1%
Black Level *	0.33	0.2 39%	0.45 -36%	0.31 6%	0.56 -70%
Contrast	745	1240 66%	716 -4%	1106 48%	945 27%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	6.28	5.3 16%	7.02 -12%	5.9 6%	9.6 -53%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	14.1	11.95 15%	10.38 26%	11.2 21%	14.4 -2%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	8.8	7.1 19%	7.1 19%	7.9 10%	10.5 -19%
Gamma	2.277 ^97%	2.327 ^95%	2.179 ^101%	2.184 ^101%	2.17 ^101%
CCT	8024 ^81%	8112 ^80%	8730 ^74%	9198 ^71%	10482 ^62%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在使用 CalMAN 软件和光谱光度计进行的测试中，我们注意到了严重的色彩偏差，尤其是亮蓝色和绿色色调的再现非常失真。此外，平板电脑只能提供有限的色彩空间。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
29.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 12.6 ms rise
29.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 16.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
67.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 32.8 ms rise
67.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 34.9 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

在明亮的阳光下，屏幕上几乎已看不出任何东西。只有在阴天或树荫下，你才能相当舒适地使用这款平板电脑。

从各个角度看，视角都非常稳定，从非常陡峭的视角看时，显示内容也不会发生变化。

性能 - Teclast M50 HD，储备不多

产品 Unisoc T606所使用的 SoC 性能不高，即使在这个经济实惠的价位上也是如此。因此，在大多数基准测试中，Teclast M50 HD 只能取得较低的成绩。

虽然在平板电脑上应避免使用要求较高的应用程序，但只要不对其提出过高要求，系统在其他大部分时间都能流畅运行，没有太多延迟。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1887, n=71, last 2 years)	707 Points +132%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	373 Points +22%
Teclast M50 Pro	360 Points +18%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	346 Points +13%
Average Unisoc T7200 (273 - 313, n=19)	306 Points 0%
Teclast M50 HD	305 Points
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)	2496 Points +110%
Teclast M50 Pro	1469 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	1345 Points +13%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	1267 Points +6%
Average Unisoc T7200 (708 - 1324, n=19)	1206 Points +1%
Teclast M50 HD	1191 Points

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (185 - 3715, n=68, last 2 years)	1093 Points +194%
Telekom T Tablet	711 Points +91%
Teclast M50 Pro	439 Points +18%
Average Unisoc T7200 (368 - 380, n=11)	375 Points +1%
Teclast M50 HD	372 Points
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (493 - 14690, n=68, last 2 years)	3518 Points +153%
Telekom T Tablet	1919 Points +38%
Teclast M50 Pro	1606 Points +15%
Teclast M50 HD	1392 Points
Average Unisoc T7200 (1285 - 1482, n=11)	1364 Points -2%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1286774, n=49, last 2 years)	464403 Points +129%
Teclast M50 Pro	230647 Points +14%
Average Unisoc T7200 (202973 - 238808, n=6)	221439 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	213115 Points +5%
Teclast M50 HD	202973 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	199786 Points -2%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 20841, n=73, last 2 years)	9812 Points +35%
Telekom T Tablet	8329 Points +15%
Teclast M50 Pro	8055 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	7404 Points +2%
Average Unisoc T7200 (6637 - 8303, n=19)	7338 Points +1%
Teclast M50 HD	7259 Points

CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=63, last 2 years)	772 Points +128%
Telekom T Tablet	534 Points +58%
Teclast M50 Pro	390 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	359 Points +6%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	356 Points +5%
Average Unisoc T7200 (339 - 362, n=5)	349 Points +3%
Teclast M50 HD	339 Points

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Tablet (444 - 11721, n=59, last 2 years)	4210 Points +119%
Telekom T Tablet	2839 Points +48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	2550 Points +33%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	2283 Points +19%
Teclast M50 Pro	2126 Points +11%
Teclast M50 HD	1923 Points
Average Unisoc T7200 (1879 - 1954, n=7)	1913 Points -1%
System
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 16435, n=59, last 2 years)	7279 Points +68%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	5507 Points +27%
Teclast M50 Pro	4969 Points +15%
Telekom T Tablet	4934 Points +14%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	4777 Points +10%
Teclast M50 HD	4335 Points
Average Unisoc T7200 (4009 - 4362, n=7)	4273 Points -1%
Memory
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10977, n=59, last 2 years)	4874 Points +74%
Telekom T Tablet	3923 Points +40%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	3412 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	3178 Points +13%
Teclast M50 Pro	3035 Points +8%
Average Unisoc T7200 (2675 - 3095, n=7)	2808 Points 0%
Teclast M50 HD	2805 Points
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (580 - 57192, n=59, last 2 years)	9171 Points +807%
Telekom T Tablet	2667 Points +164%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	2124 Points +110%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	1497 Points +48%
Teclast M50 Pro	1148 Points +14%
Average Unisoc T7200 (989 - 1076, n=7)	1023 Points +1%
Teclast M50 HD	1011 Points
Web
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2051, n=59, last 2 years)	1269 Points +14%
Telekom T Tablet	1258 Points +13%
Teclast M50 Pro	1181 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	1138 Points +2%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	1114 Points 0%
Teclast M50 HD	1112 Points
Average Unisoc T7200 (1034 - 1129, n=7)	1098 Points -1%

AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=51, last 2 years)	7152 Points +2463%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	304 Points +9%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	302 Points +8%
Teclast M50 Pro	297 Points +6%
Teclast M50 HD	279 Points
Average Unisoc T7200 (256 - 280, n=6)	275 Points -1%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 74821, n=57, last 2 years)	11329 Points +321%
Telekom T Tablet	9056 Points +237%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	4094 Points +52%
Average Unisoc T7200 (2678 - 3748, n=7)	3026 Points +12%
Teclast M50 Pro	2892 Points +8%
Teclast M50 HD	2690 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	1662 Points -38%

Legend

Teclast M50 HD Unisoc T7200, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 128 GB eMMC Flash

Teclast M50 Pro Unisoc T7255, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 UNISOC T610, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Telekom T Tablet MediaTek Dimensity 700, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash

Average Unisoc T7200

Average of class Tablet

在图形处理器方面，你可以发现它的性能储备非常有限。即使在显示屏的原始分辨率下，也很难流畅地再现要求更高的游戏。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	318 Points +218%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	185 Points +85%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	132 Points +32%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	127 Points +27%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	100 Points

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	326 Points +262%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	189 Points +110%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	135 Points +50%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	128 Points +42%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	90 Points

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1171 Points +178%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	722 Points +71%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	522 Points +24%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	476 Points +13%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	421 Points

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1173 Points +176%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	721 Points +70%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	524 Points +23%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	477 Points +12%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	425 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2511 Points +157%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1527 Points +56%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1146 Points +17%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	1106 Points +13%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	978 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2321 Points +180%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1332 Points +61%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	979 Points +18%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	937 Points +13%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	829 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	3516 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	3124 Points +18%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	3001 Points +13%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2848 Points +7%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2650 Points

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	51 fps +132%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	38 fps +73%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	31 fps +41%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	23 fps +5%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	22 fps

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	61 fps +177%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	41 fps +86%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	32 fps +45%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	24 fps +9%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	22 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	34 fps +143%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	24 fps +71%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	19 fps +36%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	16 fps +14%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	14 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	38 fps +171%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	26 fps +86%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	20 fps +43%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	16 fps +14%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	14 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	23 fps +164%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	14 fps +61%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	11 fps +26%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	9.7 fps +11%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	8.7 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	24 fps +176%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	15 fps +72%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	12 fps +38%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	9.7 fps +11%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	8.7 fps

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	12 fps +131%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	8.8 fps +69%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	6.4 fps +23%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	5.8 fps +12%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	5.2 fps

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	15 fps +178%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	9.7 fps +80%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	6.6 fps +22%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	5.9 fps +9%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	5.4 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	8.3 fps +144%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	5.9 fps +74%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	4.5 fps +32%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	3.8 fps +12%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	3.4 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	5.2 fps +160%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	3.7 fps +85%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2.7 fps +35%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	2.2 fps +10%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	12 fps +122%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	9.4 fps +74%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	7.4 fps +37%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	6 fps +11%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	5.4 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	13 fps +136%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	10 fps +82%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	7.8 fps +42%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	6.1 fps +11%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	5.5 fps

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2.2 fps +159%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1.6 fps +88%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1.2 fps +41%
Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	0.98 fps +15%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	0.85 fps

在浏览器的速度测试中，Teclast M50 HD 也只能排在较低的位置。对于较大的网页，尤其是滚动图片时，你经常需要等待。因此，上网时需要耐心等待。

Jetstream 2 | WebXPRT 4 | Speedometer 2.0 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=69, last 2 years)	108.7 Points +116%
Telekom T Tablet (chrome 116)	58.17 Points +16%
Teclast M50 Pro (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)	57.176 Points +14%
Teclast M50 HD (Chrome 120)	50.247 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Chrome 112)	49.8 Points -1%
Average Unisoc T7200 (38.1 - 52.9, n=8)	48.6 Points -3%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111)	46.85 Points -7%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=68, last 2 years)	104.3 Points +101%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Chrome 112)	58 Points +12%
Teclast M50 Pro (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)	57 Points +10%
Telekom T Tablet (chrome 116)	56 Points +8%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111)	53 Points +2%
Average Unisoc T7200 (51 - 56, n=7)	52.6 Points +1%
Teclast M50 HD (Chrome 120)	52 Points

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=63, last 2 years)	115.5 runs/min +194%
Teclast M50 Pro (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)	46.6 runs/min +19%
Average Unisoc T7200 (31.2 - 52.1, n=7)	40.8 runs/min +4%
Teclast M50 HD (Chrome 120)	39.3 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Chome 112)	38.16 runs/min -3%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chome 111)	34.43 runs/min -12%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years)	28653 Points +131%
Telekom T Tablet (chrome 116)	21843 Points +76%
Teclast M50 Pro (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)	14855 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Chrome 112)	12681 Points +2%
Teclast M50 HD (Chrome 120)	12397 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111)	11952 Points -4%
Average Unisoc T7200 (2228 - 13455, n=14)	11332 Points -9%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=74, last 2 years)	3789 ms * -24%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111)	3075.1 ms * -1%
Teclast M50 HD (Chrome 120)	3053.2 ms *
Average Unisoc T7200 (2904 - 3187, n=7)	3045 ms * -0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Chrome 112)	2895.3 ms * +5%
Teclast M50 Pro (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)	2530.7 ms * +17%
Telekom T Tablet (chrome 116)	2194.9 ms * +28%

* ... smaller is better

Teclast 平板电脑的存储空间为 128 GB，虽然速度并不快，但还是相当大的。它采用的是 eMMC 闪存，尽管在这个价位的产品中经常使用，但它并不能真正实现更快的数据传输或更短的加载时间。

最近测试的 Teclast T40 HD的测试结果表明，即使是价格低廉的平板电脑也能实现更快的数据传输：Teclast T40 HD 采用的 UFS 2.0 闪存的读取时间是普通平板电脑的两倍多。

	Teclast M50 HD	Teclast M50 Pro	Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	Telekom T Tablet	Average 128 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		14%	-18%	23%	-3%	4%	232%
Sequential Read 256KB	266.2	257.8 -3%	249 -6%	277.2 4%	287.1 8%	283 ?(106.7 - 511, n=76) 6%	1045 ?(163 - 3912, n=74, last 2 years) 293%
Sequential Write 256KB	192.3	225.22 17%	83 -57%	210.4 9%	188.3 -2%	194.6 ?(72.3 - 314, n=76) 1%	684 ?(78.2 - 3154, n=74, last 2 years) 256%
Random Read 4KB	70.4	91.95 31%	67.3 -4%	105.1 49%	52.8 -25%	82.7 ?(8.63 - 247, n=76) 17%	189.2 ?(18.4 - 451, n=74, last 2 years) 169%
Random Write 4KB	61	68.13 12%	58.8 -4%	78.5 29%	66.55 9%	55.1 ?(3.84 - 159.9, n=76) -10%	189.5 ?(8.23 - 555, n=74, last 2 years) 211%

游戏 - 更多简单游戏

遗憾的是，Teclast 的平板电脑拒绝与GameBench 的软件配合使用。的软件，因此我们无法在此提供任何具体的帧速率。但在大多数可以直接调整帧率的游戏中，我们甚至无法获得超过 30 帧的帧率。

要求更高的游戏，如《源氏冲击》，即使在低设置下也会不时出现卡顿。在这里，你还可以清楚地看到由于存储速度慢而导致的漫长加载时间。因此，玩要求不高的游戏会更有趣。

使用触摸屏和位置传感器进行控制没有任何问题。

排放--扬声器声音动听

温度

在较长的负载条件下，最高发热温度为 31.2 °C（88.2 °F），不会造成任何问题，也很难察觉。

即使在运行 20 次 3DMark Wild Life 之后，性能仍与开始时保持在同一水平，因此我们没有观察到任何因过热而导致的节流现象。

Max. Load

Idle


26.6 °C	29.9 °C	31.2 °C
26.1 °C	27.1 °C	27.1 °C
26.1 °C	25.4 °C	24.8 °C

Maximum: 31.2 °C
Average: 27.1 °C


27.5 °C	28.5 °C	28.2 °C
26.8 °C	28.1 °C	27.1 °C
26.5 °C	26.7 °C	26.7 °C

Maximum: 28.5 °C
Average: 27.3 °C

Power Supply (max.) 41.8 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.9 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.54 (2.53-2.55)

Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.87 (2.86-2.87)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.35 (4.34-4.36)

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.14 (3.13-3.16)

Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.09 (7.07-7.1)

Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.633 (0.547-0.721)

Teclast M50 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.783 (0.733-0.822)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø1.117 (1.11-1.127)

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø0.799 (0.789-0.809)

Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.02 (6.99-7.03)

发言人

Teclast M50 HD 包括立体声扬声器。虽然音量不大，但整体听起来相当平衡。你不应该期待任何清晰的低音，但至少有一些中低音是清晰可辨的。声音重现相当清晰，没有任何失真。

如果希望获得更好的音效，可以通过 3.5 毫米音频接口或蓝牙 5.0 连接扬声器或耳机。支持的 aptX HD 和 LDAC 编解码器可实现高品质的无线声音输出。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Teclast M50 HD audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Telekom T Tablet audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 合适的功耗

耗电量

Teclast 平板电脑的功耗相当不错，功耗并没有增加多少。情况恰恰相反：Teclast M50 HD 的效率相当高，尤其是在高负载情况下。考虑到 SoC 的性能值相对较低，这也是合情合理的。

该平板电脑的最大充电功率为 10 瓦，因此充电过程有时需要 3 个多小时。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	1.2 / 1.3 / 1.5 Watt
Load	3.6 / 5.5 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Teclast M50 HD 6000 mAh	Teclast M50 Pro 6000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 7040 mAh	Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 5100 mAh	Telekom T Tablet 7000 mAh
Power Consumption		-25%	-30%	-72%	-151%
Idle Minimum *	1.2	1.1 8%	1.4 -17%	1.9 -58%	1.28 -7%
Idle Average *	1.3	1.4 -8%	1.6 -23%	2.1 -62%	4.52 -248%
Idle Maximum *	1.5	1.9 -27%	2 -33%	2.5 -67%	4.58 -205%
Load Average *	3.6	5.5 -53%	4.2 -17%	7.6 -111%	10.5 -192%
Load Maximum *	5.5	8 -45%	8.7 -58%	9 -64%	11.2 -104%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Teclast M50 HD: Ø3.38 (1.195-5.51)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Teclast M50 HD; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.2 (2.04-3.59)

Teclast M50 HD; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.664 (1.321-2.64)

电池寿命

电池容量为 6,000 mAh，在同类产品中处于中等水平。电池续航时间仍然相当一般，有些平板电脑的续航时间要长得多。虽然 11:07 小时的 WLAN 上网时间尚可，在大多数情况下也足够使用一天，但其他平板电脑，如联想 Tab M10 Gen 3或三星Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022等平板电脑的续航时间要长得多。

在日常操作中，略高于 13 小时的看电影时间或 4 小时的玩游戏时间应该足够了，特别是如果平板电脑主要是在家里使用，而下一个插座离家里并不远的话。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		29h 34min
WiFi Websurfing		11h 07min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		13h 05min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 9min

	Teclast M50 HD 6000 mAh	Teclast M50 Pro 6000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 7040 mAh	Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 5100 mAh	Telekom T Tablet 7000 mAh
Battery Runtime		-14%	28%	13%	16%
Reader / Idle	1774	1660 -6%	2869 62%	1952 10%
H.264	785	579 -26%	942 20%	1002 28%
WiFi v1.3	667	555 -17%	874 31%	861 29%	775 16%
Load	249	233 -6%	250 0%	213 -14%

Pros

+ 轻质金属外壳

+ 大量存储空间

+ 双 SIM 卡移动调制解调器

+ microSD 插槽

+ 无 PWM

+ 宽频 L1

+ 不错的立体声扬声器

+ 纯净Android

+ 几乎不发热

Cons

- 摄像头几乎无法使用

- 显示屏色调浓重

- 显示屏亮度低

- 定位不准确

- 保修期短，软件更新少

- 性能相当低

- 充电速度慢

结论 - Teclast M50 HD 的优缺点

Teclast M50 HD 具有多种优势，例如存储空间大、金属外壳美观大方、扬声器音质出色。所有这些都以相当实惠的价格提供。

同时，这款 10.1 英寸的平板电脑更适合在家里使用，因为它的电池续航能力虽然不错，但并不突出，定位不准确，而且显示屏颜色较暗，很难在户外长时间使用。这是令人遗憾的，因为该平板电脑重量轻，尤其是支持移动通信，确实适合移动使用。

但无论如何，它的设备特性使其可以非常灵活地使用，而且由于其纯净的Android 13 和低发热量，在日常操作中使用也很舒适。

虽然你不应该对 SoC 的功耗抱有过高期望，但它仍然足以完成简单的任务。摄像头非常模糊，感光度不高，几乎无法使用。

Teclast M50 HD 重量轻，支持移动通信，但电量很少，电池使用时间不长。

使用 Teclast T40 HD可以获得更亮的显示屏和更长的电池续航时间，而且价格也差不多（除非有促销活动）。三星三星Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022提供移动通信、四个大功率扬声器和较长的电池续航时间，但摄像头和显示屏也难以令人信服。

价格和供应情况

Teclast M50 HD 在制造商处的售价为$200例如，亚马逊售价约为 160 美元。

Teclast M50 HD - 01/01/2024 v7 ^(old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis

79 / 98 → 81%

Keyboard

69 / 80 → 86%

Pointing Device

82%

Connectivity

44 / 70 → 62%

Weight

84 / 40-88 → 92%

Battery

89%

Display

76%

Games Performance

9 / 78 → 12%

Application Performance

58 / 92 → 63%

Temperature

97%

Noise

100%

Audio

70 / 91 → 77%

Camera

46 / 85 → 55%

Average

69%

79%

Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.