Notebookcheck Logo

Teclast T40 Plus。经济实惠的LTE平板电脑评测

10英寸,带Android 。

由于价格特别低,Teclast希望将T40 Plus定位为一款用于简单日常应用的平板电脑。由于有了LTE,在没有国内WLAN的情况下,这也是可能的,所安装的硬件似乎也适合于此。然而,我们将在评论中澄清实际提供的内容。
Touchscreen Tablet Android
钛合金T40 Plus

Teclast已经频繁出现在我们的新闻中,并对其进行了亲身测试。 梦之城_梦之城娱乐_梦之城国际娱乐_梦之城国际娱乐平台M40镜头我们已经对该制造商的质量有了一个印象。现在,Teclast T40 Plus提供了一款平板电脑,由于采用了LTE技术,价格约为200欧元(约合232美元),可以成为其他廉价设备的替代品。

Teclast T40 Plus (T Series)
Processor
UNISOC T618 8 x 2 - 2 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
Display
10.40 inch 5:3, 2000 x 1200 pixel 224 PPI, capacitive, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB 
, 112 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: combined audio jack, Card Reader: microSD (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), Sensors: accelerometer
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM 2G (850/900/1800/1900 MHz), UMTS 3G (B1/B2/B5/B19), LTE 4G FDD/TDD (B1/B2/B3/B5/B8/B20/B38/B39/B40/B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 10 x 248 x 157
Battery
6600 mAh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: quad, Keyboard: onscreen, Keyboard Light: yes, power supply, usb-c-cable, sim-needle, cover, 12 Months Warranty, GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo , fanless
Weight
455 g, Power Supply: 71 g
Price
200 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
79.9 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2021
Teclast T40 Plus
T618, Mali-G52 MP2
455 g10 mm10.40"2000x1200
83.4 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2021
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4
655 g7.9 mm11.00"2000x1200
74.3 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2021
Blackview Tab 10
Helio MT8768, PowerVR GE8320
523 g8.4 mm10.10"1920x1080
81.7 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2020
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
SD 662, Adreno 610
477 g7 mm10.40"2000x1200

外壳 - 带有塑料部分的铝制平板

Teclast用铝合金和塑料制造了T40 Plus的外壳,这使该设备看起来相对优质。在背面,不同的材料以不同的颜色相互突出,但过渡是均匀的。总的来说,制造质量很好。

然而,我们测试机型背面的相机传感器在镜头下没有居中,这对图片质量有负面影响。然而,我们无法判断这种缺陷是否经常发生。

在制造商提供的图片中,显示屏周围的边框看起来比实际情况要窄一些。这款平板电脑也比图片上看起来更厚。然而,实际尺寸与这个价格范围内的其他设备一致,而且只有455克(约16盎司),Android ,相对来说比较轻。

钛合金T40 Plus
钛合金T40 Plus
钛合金T40 Plus

Size comparison

256.8 mm 169 mm 7.9 mm 655 g248 mm 157 mm 10 mm 455 g247.6 mm 157.4 mm 7 mm 477 g243 mm 162 mm 8.4 mm 523 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g

功能 - 插孔和微型SD

Teclast T40 Plus配备了一个3.5毫米插孔和一个USB 2.0标准的USB-C端口。这是有OTG功能的,所以它可以为连接的设备充电,也可以提供连接的大容量存储作为驱动器。

像通知LED或红外端口这样的额外功能是不存在的。Camera2的API是有限的。NFC、一个无线电接收器和DRM Widevine L1被省略了。

左侧。USB-C 2.0,NaniSIM/MicroSD插槽,电源按钮
左侧。USB-C 2.0,NaniSIM/MicroSD插槽,电源按钮
顶部:麦克风、音量控制、2个扬声器
顶部:麦克风、音量控制、2个扬声器
右侧:3.5毫米插孔连接器
右侧:3.5毫米插孔连接器
底部:2个扬声器
底部:2个扬声器

微型SD卡读卡器

T40 Plus中安装了一个microSD读卡器,当用我们的参考存储卡AV Pro V60复制数据时,它只能达到26.36MB/s的低速。当插入microSD卡时,它也会阻塞第二个NanoSIM插槽。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Teclast T40 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
26.36 MB/s
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
22 MB/s -17%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Teclast T40 Plus; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø31.3 (10.5-43.1)
Teclast T40 Plus; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø75.4 (50.3-84.3)

软件--纯净Android

Teclast T40 Plus运行一个纯粹的Android-11系统。因此,没有安装制造商的第三方应用程序或程序。

在测试时,安全更新已到2021年4月5日。不可能说它们会定期发布。

软件Teclast T40 Plus
软件Teclast T40 Plus
软件Teclast T40 Plus
软件Teclast T40 Plus
软件Teclast T40 Plus
软件Teclast T40 Plus

通信和GNSS - 使用LTE和WiFi移动5

Teclast的平板电脑可以通过GSM、3G和LTE建立移动连接。安装的SoC支持LTE,下行支持Cat.7,上行支持Cat.4。4,从而使速度达到300MBit/s(下载)和50MBit/s(上传)。还可以使用VoLTE,这意味着这款平板电脑也适用于打电话。

蓝牙5.0和WiFi 5可用于近距离的无线连接。通过我们的参考路由器Netgear Nighthawk AX12,我们在传输过程中实现了305MBit/s的速度,在数据接收过程中实现了327MBit/s的速度。因此,Teclast T40 Plus与我们的测试领域不相上下。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
Adreno 610, SD 662, 32 GB eMMC Flash
332 (310min - 353max) MBit/s +9%
Blackview Tab 10
PowerVR GE8320, Helio MT8768, 64 GB eMMC Flash
309 MBit/s +1%
Teclast T40 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
305 (97min - 372max) MBit/s
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
140 (55min - 209max) MBit/s -54%
iperf3 receive AX12
Blackview Tab 10
PowerVR GE8320, Helio MT8768, 64 GB eMMC Flash
355 MBit/s +9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
Adreno 610, SD 662, 32 GB eMMC Flash
329 (323min - 333max) MBit/s +1%
Teclast T40 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
327 (311min - 331max) MBit/s
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
141 (83min - 201max) MBit/s -57%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Teclast T40 Plus UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø326 (311-331)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Qualcomm Adreno 610; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø329 (323-333)
Teclast T40 Plus UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø306 (97-372)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Qualcomm Adreno 610; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø332 (310-353)
内部的GPS测试
内部的GPS测试
户外GPS测试
户外GPS测试

通过 "GPS测试 "应用程序,T40 Plus可以在户外确定其位置,达到两米(约6.6英尺)的很好数值。

在我们强制性的自行车旅行中,Teclast平板电脑只在弯道上显示不准确,在环湖时也有明显的偏差。不过,它还是适合用于导航任务。

Teclast T40 Plus - GNSS(摘要
Teclast T40 Plus - GNSS(摘要
Teclast T40 Plus - GNSS(环湖)。
Teclast T40 Plus - GNSS(环湖)。
Teclast T40 Plus - GNSS (Turnpoint)
Teclast T40 Plus - GNSS (Turnpoint)

照相机--传感器不完全对中

前置摄像头记录
前置摄像头记录

Teclast为T40 Plus配备了一个800万像素的主摄像头和一个500万像素的前置摄像头。后者拍摄的人像照片对比度较弱,即使在光线很好的情况下也显得太暗和模糊。主摄像头显示我们的测试对象色彩苍白,细节水平适中。图片右侧的黑色散射是由相机传感器造成的,在我们的测试模型中,传感器并不是位于镜头后面的中心位置。我们的全景拍摄也表明,相机不能很好地应对不均匀的照明条件。当放大时,主体看起来很浑浊,在低光照的图像中几乎看不到任何东西。除了打开HDR模式的选项外,对图像质量没有其他调整。

视频记录显示出与我们的测试照片类似的质量。主摄像头支持480p、720p和1080p分辨率,而前置摄像头支持480p和720p。没有关于帧数的信息,也没有任何手动设置。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Close-upPanoramaZoom (4x)Low Light
orginal image
click to load images

在受控的照明条件下,Teclast T40 Plus记录的ColorChecker护照太亮了。测试图还清楚地显示了角落里的对比度弱点,据此,图片中的右侧又受到了歪斜的相机镜头的影响。

ColorChecker
10.5 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
14 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
7 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
9 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
13 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Teclast T40 Plus: 10.45 ∆E min: 2.95 - max: 15.29 ∆E
ColorChecker
30.4 ∆E
55.7 ∆E
39.9 ∆E
35.7 ∆E
45.7 ∆E
62.8 ∆E
54.6 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
44.8 ∆E
28.6 ∆E
66.1 ∆E
65 ∆E
31.9 ∆E
48.6 ∆E
38.2 ∆E
77.1 ∆E
45 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
94.8 ∆E
71.8 ∆E
53 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Teclast T40 Plus: 47.64 ∆E min: 13.95 - max: 94.84 ∆E

附件和保修 - 包括盖子

T40 Plus配备了一个USB电源适配器,配有配套的USB-C电缆,一个SIM卡针,以及一个保护罩,该保护罩还可以折叠在显示屏上,作为支架使用。

Teclast给予12个月的保修期。

输入设备和操作 - 良好的触摸屏

谷歌的GBoard可用于T40 Plus上的文字输入。触摸屏对触摸的反应非常好,也适用于广泛的刷卡运动。从纵向到横向模式的切换也很迅速。

Teclast T40 Plus - 键盘
Teclast T40 Plus - 键盘
Teclast T40 Plus - 键盘
Teclast T40 Plus - 键盘

显示屏 - 明亮且无闪烁

子像素
子像素

Teclast T40 Plus的屏幕由10.4英寸IPS面板组成,分辨率为2000 x 1200像素。亮度传感器并不存在。

最大的可调节亮度处于高水平,平均为486cd/m²。92%的照度也非常好。我们在APL50测试中测得的最高亮度为477cd/m²,最低亮度水平相当高,为39.9cd/m²。

亮度控制不依赖于使用 PWM.

481
cd/m²
485
cd/m²
463
cd/m²
502
cd/m²
496
cd/m²
474
cd/m²
504
cd/m²
499
cd/m²
473
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 504 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 486.3 cd/m² Minimum: 39.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 496 cd/m²
Contrast: 1240:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.33
Teclast T40 Plus
IPS, 2000x1200, 10.4"
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
IPS LCD, 2000x1200, 11"
Blackview Tab 10
IPS, 1920x1080, 10.1"
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
TFT-LCD, 2000x1200, 10.4"
Screen
-6%
-68%
-9%
Brightness middle
496
380
-23%
467
-6%
365
-26%
Brightness
486
376
-23%
445
-8%
337
-31%
Brightness Distribution
92
89
-3%
89
-3%
82
-11%
Black Level *
0.4
0.24
40%
0.66
-65%
0.26
35%
Contrast
1240
1583
28%
708
-43%
1404
13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.1
4.61
-49%
9.9
-219%
4.5
-45%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.6
8.77
-15%
15.66
-106%
7.8
-3%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.1
5.1
-0%
9.9
-94%
5.3
-4%
Gamma
2.33 94%
2.248 98%
1.72 128%
2.12 104%
CCT
6819 95%
7966 82%
9142 71%
7702 84%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

T40 Plus的设置菜单允许你手动调整颜色和对比度,或者让它们自动调节。在 "自动对比度 "设置和 "暖色 "色彩配置文件下,显示的色彩只是稍微增加了5.1的DeltaE-2000的偏差。

CalMAN - 色彩保真度(自动,温暖,sRGB)。
CalMAN - 色彩保真度(自动,温暖,sRGB)。
CalMAN - 色彩空间(自动、温暖、sRGB)。
CalMAN - 色彩空间(自动、温暖、sRGB)。
CalMAN - 灰度(自动,温暖,sRGB)。
CalMAN - 灰度(自动,温暖,sRGB)。
CalMAN - 饱和度(自动、温暖、sRGB
CalMAN - 饱和度(自动、温暖、sRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
19.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.4 ms rise
↘ 10.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21.2 ms rise
↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 63 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

高显示亮度使Teclast T40 Plus相当适合在户外使用。然而,根据环境的不同,可能会出现恼人的反射和眩光。

Teclast T40 Plus - 户外使用
Teclast T40 Plus - 户外使用
Teclast T40 Plus - 户外使用
Teclast T40 Plus - 户外使用

T40 Plus的IPS面板的视角非常稳定。因此,即使从平坦的角度观看内容,也不会失真或显示失真的色彩。

视角稳定
视角稳定
视角稳定
视角稳定

性能 - 简单的Android 平板电脑

Teclast T40 Plus配备了一台 UNISOC Tiger T618和8GB的内存,负责系统运行。T618是2019年的老式SoC,可以流畅地渲染系统以及简单的日常应用。对于图形内容,内部的GPU ARM Mali-G52 MP2负责。

在基准测试中,T40 Plus的系统性能与 高通Snapdragon 662中的 三星Galaxy Tab A7 LTE.作为回报,Teclast平板电脑的图形性能略好,但它无法与例如 联想Yoga Tab 11.总的来说,其性能对于这个价格范围来说是合适的。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1887, n=71, last 2 years)
707 Points +84%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
483 Points +26%
Teclast T40 Plus
384 Points
Average UNISOC T618 (365 - 393, n=6)
380 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
316 Points -18%
Blackview Tab 10
152 Points -60%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)
2494 Points +91%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
1593 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
1381 Points +6%
Average UNISOC T618 (1229 - 1461, n=6)
1332 Points +2%
Teclast T40 Plus
1309 Points
Blackview Tab 10
780 Points -40%
PCMark for Android
Work 3.0
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 20841, n=73, last 2 years)
9847 Points +17%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
8435 Points 0%
Teclast T40 Plus
8414 Points
Average UNISOC T618 (7404 - 8414, n=5)
7980 Points -5%
Blackview Tab 10
4564 Points -46%
Work 2.0 performance score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
6193 Points
Average UNISOC T618 (82 - 6937, n=2)
3510 Points
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
3294 Points +52%
Average of class Tablet (507 - 5864, n=18, last 2 years)
2615 Points +21%
Teclast T40 Plus
2163 Points
Average UNISOC T618 (2084 - 2219, n=5)
2158 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
1858 Points -14%
Blackview Tab 10
699 Points -68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
3343 Points +65%
Average of class Tablet (454 - 6698, n=18, last 2 years)
2648 Points +31%
Teclast T40 Plus
2028 Points
Average UNISOC T618 (1958 - 2065, n=5)
2016 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
1729 Points -15%
Blackview Tab 10
630 Points -69%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
3238 Points +15%
Teclast T40 Plus
2822 Points
Average of class Tablet (863 - 4085, n=18, last 2 years)
2806 Points -1%
Average UNISOC T618 (2601 - 3002, n=5)
2793 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
2517 Points -11%
Blackview Tab 10
1136 Points -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (539 - 17675, n=29, last 2 years)
5834 Points +167%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
3122 Points +43%
Teclast T40 Plus
2185 Points
Average UNISOC T618 (2105 - 2228, n=5)
2160 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
1906 Points -13%
Blackview Tab 10
835 Points -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (485 - 35165, n=29, last 2 years)
8711 Points +328%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
3055 Points +50%
Teclast T40 Plus
2033 Points
Average UNISOC T618 (1957 - 2056, n=5)
2016 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
1790 Points -12%
Blackview Tab 10
774 Points -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Average of class Tablet (463 - 6449, n=29, last 2 years)
3648 Points +23%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
3346 Points +13%
Teclast T40 Plus
2961 Points
Average UNISOC T618 (2611 - 3148, n=5)
2910 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
2466 Points -17%
Blackview Tab 10
1152 Points -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
2503 Points +70%
Average of class Tablet (361 - 14235, n=46, last 2 years)
2067 Points +41%
Teclast T40 Plus
1471 Points
Average UNISOC T618 (1425 - 1492, n=6)
1459 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
1176 Points -20%
Blackview Tab 10
411 Points -72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
2374 Points +84%
Average of class Tablet (290 - 24605, n=46, last 2 years)
2198 Points +70%
Teclast T40 Plus
1291 Points
Average UNISOC T618 (1252 - 1303, n=6)
1283 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
1022 Points -21%
Blackview Tab 10
348 Points -73%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
3192 Points +11%
Teclast T40 Plus
2866 Points
Average UNISOC T618 (2643 - 3035, n=6)
2839 Points -1%
Average of class Tablet (858 - 5751, n=46, last 2 years)
2797 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
2497 Points -13%
Blackview Tab 10
1130 Points -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (267 - 17674, n=66, last 2 years)
4499 Points +195%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
2609 Points +71%
Teclast T40 Plus
1526 Points
Average UNISOC T618 (1463 - 1569, n=6)
1519 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
1197 Points -22%
Blackview Tab 10
495 Points -68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (240 - 29325, n=66, last 2 years)
5876 Points +339%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
2476 Points +85%
Teclast T40 Plus
1338 Points
Average UNISOC T618 (1284 - 1369, n=6)
1336 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
1043 Points -22%
Blackview Tab 10
425 Points -68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Average of class Tablet (441 - 7451, n=66, last 2 years)
3632 Points +21%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
3492 Points +16%
Teclast T40 Plus
3002 Points
Average UNISOC T618 (2526 - 3202, n=6)
2954 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
2471 Points -18%
Blackview Tab 10
1171 Points -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
2681 Points +74%
Average of class Tablet (615 - 7863, n=49, last 2 years)
1973 Points +28%
Teclast T40 Plus
1538 Points
Average UNISOC T618 (1463 - 1552, n=6)
1509 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
1114 Points -28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
2537 Points +83%
Average of class Tablet (521 - 10276, n=49, last 2 years)
2063 Points +49%
Teclast T40 Plus
1383 Points
Average UNISOC T618 (1324 - 1385, n=6)
1354 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
971 Points -30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
2738 Points +8%
Teclast T40 Plus
2532 Points
Average of class Tablet (1370 - 4352, n=49, last 2 years)
2521 Points 0%
Average UNISOC T618 (2193 - 2685, n=6)
2499 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
2302 Points -9%
Wild Life Score
Average of class Tablet (286 - 7933, n=60, last 2 years)
1748 Points +146%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
1363 Points +92%
Teclast T40 Plus
711 Points
Average UNISOC T618 (693 - 721, n=5)
709 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
371 Points -48%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average of class Tablet (289 - 32525, n=73, last 2 years)
4720 Points +563%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
1371 Points +93%
Teclast T40 Plus
712 Points
Average UNISOC T618 (694 - 722, n=5)
709 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
Points -100%
Wild Life Extreme
Average of class Tablet (75 - 8689, n=74, last 2 years)
1334 Points +621%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
372 Points +101%
Teclast T40 Plus
185 Points
Average UNISOC T618 (182 - 189, n=4)
185 Points 0%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (72 - 8889, n=73, last 2 years)
1564 Points +759%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
376 Points +107%
Teclast T40 Plus
182 Points
Average UNISOC T618 (179 - 185, n=4)
181.5 Points 0%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (14 - 144, n=68, last 2 years)
64 fps +60%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
58 fps +45%
Teclast T40 Plus
40 fps
Average UNISOC T618 (37 - 42, n=6)
39.2 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
33 fps -17%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (15 - 809, n=68, last 2 years)
191.4 fps +345%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
79 fps +84%
Teclast T40 Plus
43 fps
Average UNISOC T618 (41 - 44, n=6)
42.2 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
35 fps -19%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Average of class Tablet (8.1 - 122, n=68, last 2 years)
52.5 fps +110%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
42 fps +68%
Teclast T40 Plus
25 fps
Average UNISOC T618 (22 - 25, n=6)
24.3 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
18 fps -28%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (7.3 - 530, n=68, last 2 years)
111 fps +327%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
46 fps +77%
Teclast T40 Plus
26 fps
Average UNISOC T618 (26 - 26, n=6)
26 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
19 fps -27%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (4.8 - 120, n=68, last 2 years)
39.9 fps +166%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
26 fps +73%
Teclast T40 Plus
15 fps
Average UNISOC T618 (13 - 15, n=6)
14.5 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
12 fps -20%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (5 - 400, n=68, last 2 years)
79.4 fps +429%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
29 fps +93%
Average UNISOC T618 (15 - 16, n=6)
15.2 fps +1%
Teclast T40 Plus
15 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
13 fps -13%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (3.1 - 117.9, n=67, last 2 years)
25.3 fps +205%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
16 fps +93%
Average UNISOC T618 (8.1 - 9.2, n=6)
8.57 fps +3%
Teclast T40 Plus
8.3 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
6.7 fps -19%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (2.2 - 284, n=67, last 2 years)
47.3 fps +431%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
18 fps +102%
Average UNISOC T618 (8.7 - 13, n=6)
9.83 fps +10%
Teclast T40 Plus
8.9 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
7.2 fps -19%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.9 - 106.4, n=79, last 2 years)
19 fps +217%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
10 fps +67%
Teclast T40 Plus
6 fps
Average UNISOC T618 (5.4 - 6.2, n=6)
5.92 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
4.6 fps -23%
Blackview Tab 10
2.2 fps -63%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (0.9 - 114.5, n=79, last 2 years)
21.3 fps +476%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
6.5 fps +76%
Teclast T40 Plus
3.7 fps
Average UNISOC T618 (3.6 - 3.7, n=6)
3.67 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
2.9 fps -22%
Blackview Tab 10
1.4 fps -62%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (3 - 120, n=79, last 2 years)
27.4 fps +182%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
17 fps +75%
Average UNISOC T618 (9.4 - 11, n=6)
9.97 fps +3%
Teclast T40 Plus
9.7 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
7.8 fps -20%
Blackview Tab 10
3.6 fps -63%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (2.5 - 340, n=79, last 2 years)
55.9 fps +459%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
19 fps +90%
Teclast T40 Plus
10 fps
Average UNISOC T618 (8.8 - 10, n=6)
9.8 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
8.4 fps -16%
Blackview Tab 10
3.9 fps -61%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score
Teclast T40 Plus
192320 Points
Average UNISOC T618 (173051 - 203961, n=3)
189777 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
167471 Points -13%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Tablet (444 - 11721, n=59, last 2 years)
4205 Points +100%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
2690 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
2401 Points +14%
Average UNISOC T618 (1839 - 2550, n=5)
2135 Points +1%
Teclast T40 Plus
2107 Points
System
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 16435, n=59, last 2 years)
7265 Points +44%
Teclast T40 Plus
5061 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
4979 Points -2%
Average UNISOC T618 (4403 - 5507, n=5)
4913 Points -3%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
4193 Points -17%
Memory
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10977, n=59, last 2 years)
4862 Points +246%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
3765 Points +168%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
3209 Points +129%
Average UNISOC T618 (970 - 3178, n=5)
1777 Points +27%
Teclast T40 Plus
1404 Points
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (580 - 57192, n=59, last 2 years)
9168 Points +342%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
3694 Points +78%
Teclast T40 Plus
2075 Points
Average UNISOC T618 (1834 - 2124, n=5)
2019 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
1857 Points -11%
Web
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
1353 Points +1%
Teclast T40 Plus
1336 Points
Average UNISOC T618 (1138 - 1336, n=5)
1273 Points -5%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2051, n=59, last 2 years)
1269 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
1120 Points -16%

Legend

 
Teclast T40 Plus UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 Mediatek Helio G90T, ARM Mali-G76 MP4, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Blackview Tab 10 Mediatek MT8768, PowerVR GE8320, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Teclast T40 Plus在浏览器基准测试中取得了相对较好的成绩,在我们的测试领域中,可以在WebXPRT 3和Mozilla Kraken 1.1中获得第一名。在日常使用中,网站建立得很快,滚动也很流畅。媒体内容也能快速提供。

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 (Chrome93)
69.8 Points +1%
Teclast T40 Plus (Chrome 95)
69.1 Points
Average UNISOC T618 (63.2 - 75.3, n=4)
68.5 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) (Chrome 86.0.4240.185)
49.52 Points -28%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=45, last 2 years)
155.2 Points +110%
Average UNISOC T618 (68 - 93, n=6)
75.7 Points +2%
Teclast T40 Plus (Chrome 95)
74 Points
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 (Chrome93)
53 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) (Chrome 86.0.4240.185)
52 Points -30%
Blackview Tab 10 (Chrome 93.0.4577.62)
33 Points -55%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=87, last 2 years)
29371 Points +120%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 (Chrome93)
15632 Points +17%
Teclast T40 Plus (Chrome 95)
13348 Points
Average UNISOC T618 (10787 - 14722, n=6)
12599 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) (Chrome 86.0.4240.185)
9737 Points -27%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Blackview Tab 10 (Chrome 93.0.4577.62)
10760 ms * -277%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) (Chrome 86.0.4240.185)
4498 ms * -58%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 (Chrome93)
3782 ms * -33%
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=75, last 2 years)
3734 ms * -31%
Average UNISOC T618 (2762 - 3432, n=6)
2962 ms * -4%
Teclast T40 Plus (Chrome 95)
2853 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Teclast在T40 Plus中安装了一个128GB eMMC闪存。这只能提供较低的读写速率,主要体现在对存储数据的访问速度较慢。

Teclast T40 PlusLenovo Yoga Tab 11Blackview Tab 10Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)Average 128 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
451%
10%
166%
139%
655%
Sequential Read 256KB
151.1
503
233%
263.6
74%
298
97%
Sequential Write 256KB
136.8
374.4
174%
135.3
-1%
89.9
-34%
194.6 ?(72.3 - 314, n=77)
42%
Random Read 4KB
29.24
136.8
368%
31.37
7%
82
180%
82.7 ?(8.63 - 247, n=77)
183%
Random Write 4KB
16.12
182.2
1030%
9.4
-42%
83.6
419%

排放 - 适度的温度和高容量

温度

根据我们的测量,T40 Plus的表面加热到35.2℃(~95°F)。因此,Android ,这款平板电脑只是适度发热,可以随时拿在手里,比如说。野生动物耐力压力测试也表明,即使在重负荷下,性能也保持稳定。

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

012345678Tooltip
Teclast T40 Plus Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.27 (4.26-4.28)
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø8.09 (8.05-8.11)
Teclast T40 Plus Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø1.105 (1.103-1.107)
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø2.31 (2.29-2.31)
Max. Load
 33.2 °C30 °C34.5 °C 
 35.2 °C30.8 °C34.4 °C 
 33.9 °C31.1 °C34.4 °C 
Maximum: 35.2 °C
Average: 33.1 °C
28.5 °C30.6 °C31.8 °C
28.1 °C29.9 °C32.8 °C
28.3 °C29.3 °C30.6 °C
Maximum: 32.8 °C
Average: 30 °C
Power Supply (max.)  33 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.1 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.2 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.3 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
热图像-顶部
热图像-顶部
热图像-底面
热图像-底面

演讲者

Teclast T40 Plus的扬声器可以相对响亮地播放,并提供在高音调上很明显的声谱。因此,它们适用于播放语音内容,但对于更复杂的媒体内容,建议使用外部扬声器或耳机。例如,这些可以通过3.5毫米插孔连接,其信噪比为64.52 dBFS,可以接受。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203741.42525.642.53129.143.34023.445.45036.844.66328.4468024.849.710022.449.812519.250.316016.952.320015.654.125013.85631513.45640013.358.950013.863.16301264.480012.771.1100012.279.712501381160013.780.9200013.280.9250013.48131501383400013.385.6500013.685.4630013.381.8800013.882.31000013.777.9125001470.11600013.567.5SPL25.593.7N0.796.5median 13.5median 77.9Delta0.710.329.535.233.136.327.427.131.328.730.331.229.627.524.123.520.736.317.652.614.857.312.361.112.867.910.467.9969.211.372.814.471.117.1721470.910.471.49.474.510.67311.472.613.668.613.770.215.374.915.47616.668.117.661.417.360.717.653.926.384.20.765median 14median 69.23.15.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseTeclast T40 PlusLenovo Yoga Tab 11
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Teclast T40 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (1.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 8.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理--节俭的10英寸平板电脑

能源消耗

负载下的最大功耗为5.94瓦,Teclast T40 Plus是我们测试领域中最节俭的平板电脑。

附带的USB电源适配器的输出功率为12.5瓦,因此足够高。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.55 / 0.14 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.11 / 1.13 / 1.62 Watt
Load midlight 4.01 / 5.94 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Teclast T40 Plus
6600 mAh
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
7700 mAh
Blackview Tab 10
7480 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
7040 mAh
Power Consumption
-26%
-179%
-137%
Idle Minimum *
1.11
1.2
-8%
2
-80%
1.18
-6%
Idle Average *
1.13
1.5
-33%
6
-431%
4.92
-335%
Idle Maximum *
1.62
1.9
-17%
6.1
-277%
4.95
-206%
Load Average *
4.01
4.9
-22%
6.8
-70%
7.21
-80%
Load Maximum *
5.94
8.8
-48%
8.1
-36%
9.32
-57%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789Tooltip
Teclast T40 Plus UNISOC T618: Ø4.22 (1.118-9.08)
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 Mediatek Helio G90T: Ø4.24 (1.478-8.87)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.50.711.21.51.722.22.52.72.93.23.43.73.94.24.44.7Tooltip
Teclast T40 Plus UNISOC T618; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.32 (1.229-3.8)
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 Mediatek Helio G90T; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.24 (3.88-4.91)
Teclast T40 Plus UNISOC T618; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.179 (1.161-1.225)
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 Mediatek Helio G90T; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.483 (1.201-2.07)

电池寿命

在我们的实际Wi-Fi测试中,Teclast T40 Pro实现了12小时38分的运行时间。因此,它可以很好地利用其6600毫安时的电池,实现了与电池容量普遍较大的竞争设备相似的价值。

使用随附的充电器,大约三个半小时后,该平板电脑就能完全充电。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
12h 38min
Teclast T40 Plus
6600 mAh
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
7700 mAh
Blackview Tab 10
7480 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
7040 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
758
891
18%
774
2%
757
0%

Pros

+ 明亮的显示屏
+ 良好的电池寿命
+ 具有LTE功能
+ 可扩展的内存

Cons

- 摄像质量平平
- 没有亮度传感器
- 内部存储器和存储卡阅读器速度慢
- 不确定的更新供应

结论 - 适用于日常使用

在审查中。Teclast T40 Plus。测试设备由以下单位提供。梦之城_梦之城娱乐_梦之城国际娱乐_梦之城国际娱乐平台
在审查中。Teclast T40 Plus。测试设备由以下单位提供。梦之城_梦之城娱乐_梦之城国际娱乐_梦之城国际娱乐平台

在我们的测试中,Teclast T40 Plus被证明是一款用于简单日常应用的廉价平板电脑。构建质量基本上是好的,但个别设备可能存在缺陷,正如我们的测试模型背面的相机传感器滑落所示。耳机插孔和128GB的内部存储以及LTE完善了原本稀少的设备包。

由于显示效果好、电池寿命长和价格低,Teclast T40是一款适合日常使用的平板电脑。

然而,非常好的电池运行时间和明亮的显示屏也很适合日常使用。由于后者是无PWM的,色彩还原相对较好,所以也很适合敏感的眼睛。如果内部存储不够,你还可以通过microSD卡进行扩展。

在价格低廉的平板电脑中,Teclast将T40 Plus与 三星Galaxy Tab A7 LTE联想Yoga Tab 11.然而,那些能多花点钱的人很快就会以 Apple iPad 10.2作为一个强有力的替代品。

价格和可用性

Teclast T40 Plus目前只能从Amazon(DE),但也可以通过AliExpress订购,例如.

Teclast T40 Plus - 10/25/2021 v7 (old)
Mike Wobker

Chassis
73 / 98 → 74%
Keyboard
69 / 80 → 87%
Pointing Device
83%
Connectivity
41 / 70 → 59%
Weight
84 / 40-88 → 91%
Battery
89%
Display
84%
Games Performance
16 / 78 → 20%
Application Performance
53 / 92 → 58%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
76 / 91 → 83%
Camera
32 / 85 → 38%
Average
69%
80%
Tablet - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Teclast T40 Plus。经济实惠的LTE平板电脑评测
Mike Wobker, 2021-11- 9 (Update: 2021-11- 9)