Notebookcheck Logo

Teclast T50平板电脑评测--性价比爆棚

大量的存储空间。

Teclast T50宣传的是有大量的数据空间,良好的声音,以及对LTE的支持,包括电话功能,而且价格低廉。这款来自远东的平板电脑能否兑现这一承诺,还是有问题?
Android ARM Tablet
钛合金T50
Teclast T50 (T Series)
Processor
UNISOC T616 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G57 MP1
Memory
8 GB 
Display
11.00 inch 5:3, 2000 x 1200 pixel 212 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, 60 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 110 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: hall, proximity, gyroscope
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.7 x 260 x 164
Battery
7500 mAh Lithium-Ion, 18 Watt charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 20 MPix
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 4 speakers, charger, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
510 g
Price
260 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
81.8 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2023
Teclast T50
T616, Mali-G57 MP1
510 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash11.00"2000x1200
80 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
T610, Mali-G52 MP2
460 g64 GB eMMC Flash10.10"1920x1200
80.8 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2023
Blackview Tab 13
Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2
450 g128 GB eMMC Flash10.10"1920x1200
81.5 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2023
Nokia T21
T612, Mali-G52 MP1
466 g64 GB eMMC Flash10.36"2000x1200

外壳和设备 - 铝制底盘不时发出吱吱声

Teclast T50是一款拥有11英寸显示屏的平板电脑,售价260欧元。对于这样的价格,你得到了一个铝制的一体成型的底盘。我们的测试设备也有一个干净的表面,看起来很稳定,即使我们能激起安静的吱吱声。

角落很圆滑,T50的手感很好。它的重量并不轻,只有510克,但对其尺寸来说并不过分沉重。它还提供了比传统10.1英寸平板电脑更多一点的屏幕面积。

这款平板电脑只在中欧地区销售,配备了相对较少的8GB内存和128GB UFS 2.1大容量存储。然而,没有3.5毫米的耳机插孔接口,而且你也必须没有NFC,例如,用于移动支付交易。

microSD读卡器可以接受容量高达1TB的卡,但在使用时它会阻塞两个SIM卡插槽中的一个。在我们用参考卡Angelbird V60进行的测试中,读卡器似乎相当慢,而且在传输速度上也出现了明显的波动。

钛合金T50
钛合金T50
钛合金T50

尺寸比较

260 mm 164 mm 9.7 mm 510 g247.5 mm 157.3 mm 7.5 mm 466 g239.84 mm 158.62 mm 8.5 mm 460 g238.8 mm 157.6 mm 7.7 mm 450 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Nokia T21
  (Angelbird V60)
35.9 MB/s +62%
Average of class Tablet
  (7.61 - 101.6, n=58, last 2 years)
33.2 MB/s +50%
Blackview Tab 13
  (Angelbird V60)
25.3 MB/s +14%
Teclast T50
  (Angelbird V60)
22.2 MB/s
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
  (Angelbird V60)
21.3 MB/s -4%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Teclast T50 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø28.6 (16.4-43.4)
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø34 (17.4-45.3)
Blackview Tab 13 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø25.9 (16.1-46.4)
Nokia T21 Mali-G52 MP1, T612, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø37 (27.6-47.9)
Teclast T50 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø63.2 (32.6-85.6)
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø71.3 (43.6-81.3)
Blackview Tab 13 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø75.8 (38.2-83.5)
Nokia T21 Mali-G52 MP1, T612, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø72.3 (25.7-81.4)

通信、软件和操作 - 纯粹的,但不完全是最新的Android

Teclast T50采用Wi-Fi 5作为最快的Wi-Fi标准。这款平板电脑的速度为298至379兆比特/秒,与这个价格范围内的其他平板电脑相当。在我们的测试中,传输速率也相当稳定。

这款平板电脑还可以接受两张SIM卡,并可以使用它们进行移动互联网接入。这以最大的LTE速度工作,并支持在欧洲运行的最必要的频率。

你还可以通过平板电脑拨打标准电话,但没有听筒,所以要么每个人都在听,要么你需要一个耳机。

Android 12是预装的,制造商几乎没有改变,所以用户界面的工作方式与许多其他设备一样。不幸的是,安全补丁有点老,即在测试时从2022年9月开始。至少,Teclast T50带有Widevine L1认证,所以你可以享受最高质量的流媒体。

这款平板电脑没有指纹传感器,但用户可以使用面部识别作为解锁设备的生物识别方法。由于大屏幕的余光,这种方法工作可靠,甚至在黑暗中也能工作,但由于对面部数据的纯软件评估,这种方法比较脆弱。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Blackview Tab 13
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
370 (336min - 376max) MBit/s 0%
Teclast T50
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
370 (351min - 379max) MBit/s
Nokia T21
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
363 (269min - 388max) MBit/s -2%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
351 (333min - 366max) MBit/s -5%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Blackview Tab 13
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
332 (306min - 352max) MBit/s +6%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
319 (310min - 325max) MBit/s +2%
Nokia T21
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
317 (298min - 332max) MBit/s +1%
Teclast T50
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
313 (298min - 325max) MBit/s
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Teclast T50; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø312 (298-325)
Teclast T50; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø370 (351-379)

相机 - 平板电脑质量

来自前置摄像头的照片
来自前置摄像头的照片

Teclast在背面安装了一个带有索尼传感器的单摄像头。它的分辨率为2000万像素,对于一个廉价的平板电脑来说,在物体摄影方面显示出相当不错的图像清晰度。然而,动态范围还有待改进:黑暗区域几乎没有任何细节,而明亮区域则很快变得模糊。这在低光和高对比度的情况下尤其明显。

这种印象在测试实验室的照片中也得到了证实:在良好的工作室照明下的测试图看起来相当清晰,但明显曝光过度。在照度只有1勒克斯的情况下,照片中没有任何东西可以识别。

用户可以录制1080p和最多30帧的视频。自动对焦似乎时常有点力不从心,而亮度补偿有时也会出现延迟反应。然而,总的来说,如果要求不是太高,照片是可以使用的。

前面有一个800万像素的自拍相机。它拍摄的照片还不错,细节上看起来有点冲淡,但它们是可以使用的。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLowLight
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
19.1 ∆E
17.7 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
19.9 ∆E
20.2 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
21.9 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
15 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Teclast T50: 15.31 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 21.93 ∆E
ColorChecker
30 ∆E
55.5 ∆E
40.2 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
46.1 ∆E
62.8 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
65.5 ∆E
64.5 ∆E
31.9 ∆E
49.2 ∆E
37.7 ∆E
77.1 ∆E
45 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
94.8 ∆E
71.7 ∆E
53 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
14 ∆E
ColorChecker Teclast T50: 47.64 ∆E min: 13.99 - max: 94.84 ∆E

显示屏 - 明亮且无PWM

子像素结构
子像素结构

凭借2000 x 1200像素的分辨率,IPS显示屏呈现的内容相当清晰,即使是在Teclast T50相对较大的显示屏上。不幸的是,最大帧率只有60赫兹。Teclast在其网站上提到了 "120赫兹采样率",但这可能是指触摸屏的采样率。

这款平板电脑在亮度方面表现不错:我们测得的平均亮度为417cd/m²,比其他便宜的平板电脑提供的亮度要高得多,对于明亮的室外天来说可能不够,但至少对于光线充沛的客厅来说是足够的。

不幸的是,0.5cd/m²的黑值相对较高,所以黑暗区域看起来相当灰暗,面板上的颜色也不那么亮丽。在我们用分光光度计和CalMAN软件进行的测试中,灰度中可以看到轻微的蓝色偏移。然而,颜色基本上是以良好的精度再现的。

我们没有注意到PWM的闪烁。

420
cd/m²
429
cd/m²
418
cd/m²
430
cd/m²
438
cd/m²
396
cd/m²
436
cd/m²
414
cd/m²
371
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 438 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 416.9 cd/m² Minimum: 19 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 438 cd/m²
Contrast: 876:1 (Black: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.37 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.322
Teclast T50
IPS, 2000x1200, 11"
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1"
Blackview Tab 13
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1"
Nokia T21
IPS, 2000x1200, 10.4"
Response Times
23%
7%
-38%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
45.5 ?(22.8, 22.7)
42 ?(22.8, 19.2)
8%
35.9 ?(18.6, 17.3)
21%
84 ?(62, 22)
-85%
Response Time Black / White *
29.7 ?(13.4, 16.3)
18.4 ?(11.2, 7.2)
38%
32.2 ?(14.1, 18.1)
-8%
27 ?(13, 14)
9%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-13%
-4%
-10%
Brightness middle
438
343
-22%
344
-21%
389
-11%
Brightness
417
332
-20%
330
-21%
382
-8%
Brightness Distribution
85
94
11%
93
9%
94
11%
Black Level *
0.5
0.31
38%
0.27
46%
0.57
-14%
Contrast
876
1106
26%
1274
45%
682
-22%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.37
5.9
-35%
5.32
-22%
4.93
-13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.48
11.2
-50%
11.27
-51%
8.53
-14%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.3
7.9
-49%
6.2
-17%
5.7
-8%
Gamma
2.322 95%
2.184 101%
2.106 104%
2.073 106%
CCT
7855 83%
9198 71%
8023 81%
8029 81%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
5% / -6%
2% / -2%
-24% / -16%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
29.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13.4 ms rise
↘ 16.3 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
45.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22.8 ms rise
↘ 22.7 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

具有固定变焦水平和不同亮度设置的测量系列

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN颜色精度
卡尔曼色彩空间sRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间sRGB
CalMAN饱和度
CalMAN饱和度

性能、排放和电池寿命 - 强大的扬声器

淘宝网 Unisoc T616Unisoc T616是一个主频高达2GHz的SoC,对于较简单的任务来说完全够用,而且还能在Teclast T50的菜单中进行相当流畅的导航。然而,多任务处理或更复杂的应用程序有时会给系统带来挑战,一些输入只能通过延迟实现。在这个价格范围内有一些更快的设备,特别是在图形性能方面。

然而,存储速度是一个真正的亮点,因为Teclast T50的UFS 2.1闪存可以超越所有同等价位的对手。这也经常导致上网时的流畅体验。

即使在高负荷情况下,高达34℃的发热也几乎不明显。3DMark的压力测试结果也与此相符,在长时间的负载下也没有显示出性能下降。

Teclast T50配备了四个扬声器,在我们的测试中不是特别响亮,但声音很好。它不包含任何深沉的低音,但能有力地再现深沉的中音。扬声器即使在全音量下也不会过载,可以听到人声和乐器的相当多的细节。

用户还可以通过USB-C或蓝牙5.0连接外部音频设备。然而,支持的音频编解码器的种类有点有限,特别是更现代的变体:SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD和LDAC都可用。

这款平板电脑配备了一个容量相对较高的7500毫安时电池。电池寿命很好,我们在Wi-Fi测试中确定的时间略低于15小时。然而,其他电池容量小得多的平板电脑也能达到类似的运行时间,因此Teclast T50在效率方面可能仍有一些需要追赶的地方。

最大充电功率为18瓦,并包括一个相应的电源。因此,直到平板电脑再次充满电,可能需要3个小时。不支持无线充电。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (140 - 1890, n=71, last 2 years)
704 Points +96%
Teclast T50
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
360 Points
Average UNISOC T616
  (298 - 380, n=7)
351 Points -2%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
UNISOC T610, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
346 Points -4%
Nokia T21
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
344 Points -4%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (312 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)
2450 Points +67%
Teclast T50
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
1464 Points
Nokia T21
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1419 Points -3%
Average UNISOC T616
  (1184 - 1502, n=7)
1410 Points -4%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
UNISOC T610, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1267 Points -13%
Geekbench 6.0
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (417 - 1663, n=4, last 2 years)
808 Points +87%
Teclast T50
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
433 Points
Average UNISOC T616
  ()
433 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
UNISOC T610, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
417 Points -4%
Blackview Tab 13
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
408 Points -6%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (1361 - 4130, n=4, last 2 years)
2253 Points +45%
Teclast T50
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
1554 Points
Average UNISOC T616
  ()
1554 Points 0%
Blackview Tab 13
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1368 Points -12%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
UNISOC T610, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1361 Points -12%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Tablet
  (3195 - 20841, n=71, last 2 years)
9556 Points +20%
Average UNISOC T616
  (7936 - 8066, n=6)
8004 Points +1%
Teclast T50
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
7946 Points
Nokia T21
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
7436 Points -6%
3DMark
Wild Life Score
Average of class Tablet
  (286 - 7933, n=60, last 2 years)
1690 Points +263%
Blackview Tab 13
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
761 Points +63%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
UNISOC T610, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
524 Points +12%
Average UNISOC T616
  (463 - 479, n=6)
472 Points +1%
Teclast T50
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
466 Points
Nokia T21
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
419 Points -10%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average of class Tablet
  (289 - 32525, n=72, last 2 years)
4490 Points +861%
Blackview Tab 13
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
757 Points +62%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
UNISOC T610, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
522 Points +12%
Average UNISOC T616
  (464 - 478, n=6)
473 Points +1%
Teclast T50
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
467 Points
Nokia T21
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
426 Points -9%
Wild Life Extreme
Average of class Tablet
  (75 - 8689, n=73, last 2 years)
1272 Points +864%
Blackview Tab 13
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
193 Points +46%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
UNISOC T610, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
135 Points +2%
Teclast T50
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
132 Points
Average UNISOC T616
  (127 - 132, n=6)
129 Points -2%
Nokia T21
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
115 Points -13%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Average of class Tablet
  (72 - 8889, n=72, last 2 years)
1502 Points +1083%
Blackview Tab 13
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
191 Points +50%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
UNISOC T610, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
132 Points +4%
Teclast T50
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
127 Points
Average UNISOC T616
  (126 - 127, n=6)
126.5 Points 0%
Nokia T21
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
Points -100%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet
  (3 - 120, n=78, last 2 years)
26.1 fps +358%
Blackview Tab 13
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
7.5 fps +32%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
UNISOC T610, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7.4 fps +30%
Teclast T50
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
5.7 fps
Average UNISOC T616
  (5.4 - 6, n=6)
5.7 fps 0%
Nokia T21
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
5.2 fps -9%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet
  (2.5 - 340, n=78, last 2 years)
53.7 fps +766%
Blackview Tab 13
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
8.4 fps +35%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
UNISOC T610, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7.8 fps +26%
Teclast T50
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
6.2 fps
Average UNISOC T616
  (6.1 - 6.2, n=6)
6.15 fps -1%
Nokia T21
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
5.6 fps -10%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet
  (1.9 - 106.4, n=78, last 2 years)
18.1 fps +403%
Blackview Tab 13
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
5 fps +39%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
UNISOC T610, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4.5 fps +25%
Average UNISOC T616
  (3.4 - 3.8, n=6)
3.62 fps +1%
Teclast T50
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
3.6 fps
Nokia T21
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
3.3 fps -8%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet
  (0.9 - 114.5, n=78, last 2 years)
20.3 fps +783%
Blackview Tab 13
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
3.3 fps +43%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
UNISOC T610, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2.7 fps +17%
Teclast T50
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
2.3 fps
Average UNISOC T616
  (2.2 - 2.3, n=6)
2.23 fps -3%
Nokia T21
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
2 fps -13%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet
  (0.4 - 55.1, n=76, last 2 years)
9.59 fps +899%
Blackview Tab 13
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1.4 fps +46%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
UNISOC T610, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1.2 fps +25%
Average UNISOC T616
  (0.95 - 0.98, n=5)
0.968 fps +1%
Teclast T50
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
0.96 fps
Nokia T21
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
0.9 fps -6%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet
  (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years)
28263 Points +107%
Average UNISOC T616
  (12141 - 15304, n=5)
14092 Points +3%
Teclast T50
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
13640 Points
Nokia T21
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
12581 Points -8%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
UNISOC T610, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
11952 Points -12%
Blackview Tab 13
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
11712 Points -14%
Teclast T50Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3Blackview Tab 13Nokia T21Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-64%
-70%
-69%
-37%
-10%
Sequential Read 256KB
920.5
277.2
-70%
289.1
-69%
266.46
-71%
Sequential Write 256KB
713.4
210.4
-71%
173.1
-76%
195.53
-73%
Random Read 4KB
207.1
105.1
-49%
79
-62%
78.85
-62%
152.9 ?(92.6 - 239, n=113)
-26%
Random Write 4KB
238.1
78.5
-67%
63.1
-73%
71.2
-70%
131.6 ?(18.2 - 290, n=113)
-45%

温度

Max. Load
 34 °C28.5 °C29.8 °C 
 26.3 °C28.9 °C31.2 °C 
 32.7 °C29.2 °C31.1 °C 
Maximum: 34 °C
Average: 30.2 °C
28.9 °C29.8 °C32.8 °C
29.1 °C29.5 °C34 °C
29 °C29.9 °C32.9 °C
Maximum: 34 °C
Average: 30.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  41.2 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.


热力图前线
热力图前线
热图 背面
热图 背面
3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
97.5 (0.789min - 0.809max) %
Nokia T21
%
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Teclast T50
99.7 (2.79min - 2.8max) %
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
99.3 (3.13min - 3.16max) % 0%
Nokia T21
97.5 (2.52min - 2.59max) % -2%

Legend

 
Teclast T50 UNISOC T616, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 UNISOC T610, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Blackview Tab 13 Mediatek Helio G85, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nokia T21 UNISOC T612, ARM Mali-G52 MP1, 64 GB eMMC Flash

演讲者

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.438.4253734.23132.9344032.132.15035.733.66327.427.28021.522.11002328.212524.134.416019.542.320013.548.125013.656.431512.662.24001268.150011.471.563011.975.480011.877.5100013.267.3125015.861.416001162.5200011.370.425001270.8315012.973.5400014.868.1500017.267.2630015.766.5800015.966.81000016.565.91250016.857.91600017.741.4SPL26.582.5N0.855.6median 13.6median 66.5Delta2.76.439.438.239.138.831.529.829.829.433.434.526.629.322.32120.521.615.626.114.736.811.442.61048.98.853.9959.110.561.812.267.914.372.711.668.41268.210.267.510.469.411.165.312.763.614.467.614.267.614.767.215.666.416.563.316.560.417.347.525.479.50.645.9median 12.7median 63.62.69.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseTeclast T50Nokia T21
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Teclast T50 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Nokia T21 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Nokia T21
8200 mAh
929 min +3%
Blackview Tab 13
7280 mAh
926 min +3%
Teclast T50
7500 mAh
903 min
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
5100 mAh
861 min -5%
Average of class Tablet
  (319 - 1764, n=78, last 2 years)
823 min -9%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
15h 03min

Pros

+ 明亮的屏幕
+ 通过Widevin-L1认证
+ 快速的内存
+ 充足的RAM
+ 带有双SIM卡的LTE
+ 相当纯净Android
+ 没有PWM

Cons

- 过时的安全补丁
- 总体来说相机质量平平
- 外壳吱吱作响
- 没有3.5毫米音频接口
- 充电速度慢
- 蓝牙编解码器少

结论 - Teclast平板电脑令人信服

在审查中:Teclast T50。测试设备由Teclast Europe提供。
在审查中:Teclast T50。测试设备由Teclast Europe提供。

Teclast T50具有良好的性价比,拥有大量的快速内存,明亮的屏幕以及良好的运行时间,甚至还支持LTE。这款平板电脑并不是一个非凡的设计亮点,但它的制造质量很扎实,它带给买家的是相当纯粹的Android 12。

相机不能满足苛刻的用户,但对于平板电脑来说,它们是可以的。你会徒劳地寻找一个指纹传感器和一个3.5毫米的音频端口。蓝牙编解码器的选择也有些有限。

作为回报,安装的四个扬声器具有很高的音量,并提供良好的音质。Teclast仍然可以在效率上下功夫;这款平板电脑的大电池可以实现更好的运行时间。对于这样一个巨大的电池来说,更快的充电技术也是一件好事,但另一方面,问题是你是否会经常带着一个超过500克的平板电脑远离电源插座。

Teclast T50以相对较少的钱配备了非常好的设备。

如果你想选择更成熟的制造商,你可以通过以下产品获得更好的平板电脑 联想Tab M10第三代但必须在屏幕亮度和软件方面做出让步。这款 Blackview Tab 13甚至更便宜,但它有令人讨厌的、无法卸载的光顾性应用程序。

价格和可用性

在中欧,Teclast T50是通过amazon.de出售的。出售,目前可以在那里找到约200欧元的折扣。

Teclast T50 - 04/20/2023 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
81 / 98 → 83%
Keyboard
65 / 80 → 82%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
44 / 70 → 62%
Weight
83 / 40-88 → 90%
Battery
91%
Display
82%
Games Performance
9 / 78 → 11%
Application Performance
55 / 92 → 60%
Temperature
94%
Noise
100%
Audio
80 / 91 → 88%
Camera
48 / 85 → 56%
Average
71%
82%
Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Teclast T50平板电脑评测--性价比爆棚
Florian Schmitt, 2023-04-21 (Update: 2023-04-21)