Teclast T60 评测--配备超大电池的 12 英寸平板电脑

Name: Teclast T60
Brand: Teclast

储物空间充足。

Teclast T60 的主要功能包括令人印象深刻的显示屏和大容量电池。它的售价约为 300 美元，但也经常以更低的价格出售。虽然功率不足，但它支持手机，存储空间也很大。

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 01/16/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Tablet

Teclast T60 是中国生产商产品阵容中最大的平板电脑之一，拥有直径近 12 英寸的屏幕，为观看电影或编辑文档等活动提供了充足的空间。

T60 售价不到 300 美元，但仍配备了金属外壳、蜂窝调制解调器和大容量电池。

不过，在研究数据表中的充电速度和 SoC 规格时，削减成本的措施就显而易见了。让我们深入了解一下 Teclast T60 是否仍然值得选择，以及它最适合哪些人。

Test device courtesy of Teclast

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Teclast T60 (T Series)

Processor

Unisoc T7255 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G57 MP1

Memory

8 GB

Display

11.97 inch 5:3, 2000 x 1200 pixel 195 PPI, capactive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz

Storage

256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash, 256 GB

, 235 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, Card Reader: microSD (shared, up to 1 TB), Brightness Sensor, Sensors: hall, proximity

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B5/B8), 4G (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.7 x 279 x 174

Battery

8000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 10 watt charging

Operating System

Android 13

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix LED flash
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: 4 speakers, charger, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, Widevine L1, fanless

Weight

570 g

Price

299 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
80.7 % v7 ^(old)	01 / 2024	Teclast T60 T7255, Mali-G57 MP1	570 g	7.7 mm	11.97"	2000x1200
80 % v7 ^(old)	11 / 2023	Teclast T40 Air T7255, Mali-G57 MP1	464 g	7.7 mm	10.36"	2000x1200
83.3 % v7 ^(old)	09 / 2023	Amazon Fire Max 11 MT8188J, Mali-G57 MP2	490 g	7.5 mm	11.00"	2000x1200
86.5 % v7 ^(old)	09 / 2023	Huawei MatePad 11.5 SD 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644	499 g	6.85 mm	11.50"	2200x1440
83.5 % v7 ^(old)	01 / 2024	Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE SD 680, Adreno 610	481 g	7.36 mm	11.00"	1920x1200

外壳 - 坚固的金属外壳

Teclast 将 T60 的颜色称为太空灰，这无疑是从Apple 中汲取的灵感。金属外壳经过抛光处理，没有锋利的边缘，手感舒适。机身坚固耐用，液晶屏幕上的压痕需要刻意用力才能留下。

值得注意的细节是闪亮的金属红色待机键，为原本低调的设计增添了一抹亮色。在顶部边缘，还加入了一条颜色稍深的塑料条，以增强平板电脑各种天线的接收能力。

虽然这个价位的平板电脑更加小巧轻便，但 Teclast T60 570 克的重量被认为是合理的，尤其是考虑到其宽大的屏幕尺寸。

尺寸比较

连接性 - Teclast 平板电脑拥有大量存储空间

毫无疑问，Teclast T60 在内存方面超过了许多同价位的设备。Teclast T60 拥有 8GB 内存和惊人的 256GB eMMC 数据存储空间，超越了同价位的大多数其他设备。

尽管生产商声称内存更大，但实际上是通过在数据存储器上使用交换文件来实现的。不过，这种方法非常缓慢，而且在现有大容量 RAM 的情况下，不太可能为大多数程序带来相当大的优势。

与大多数配备 3.5 毫米音频接口的 Teclast 平板电脑不同，Teclast T60 选择了排他性：音频设备只能通过 USB-C 端口的线缆连接，必要时还需要使用转接器。值得注意的是，该端口最高支持 USB 2.0 速度。

SIM 卡座可灵活插入 2 个 nano-SIM 卡或 SIM 卡和 microSD 的组合以扩展内存。

microSD 读卡器

在测试过程中，我们使用指定的参考 microSD 卡 Angelbird V60 对 microSD 读卡器进行了评估。Teclast T60 的数据传输速率略低于 30 MB/s，在 CPDT 基准测试中，读卡器的性能达到了同类产品的水平。

值得注意的是，该平板电脑未能完全发挥存储卡的潜在读取速度，读取速度为 260 MB/s，写入速度为 140 MB/s。尽管 Teclast T60 实现了不错的数据传输速度，但在读写速度方面并没有最大限度地发挥 microSD 卡的性能。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)	29.8 MB/s
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	28.92 MB/s -3%
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)	28.4 MB/s -5%
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	11.83 MB/s -60%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø37.7 (28-49.4)

Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø41.4 (28.2-50.2)

Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø25.5 (16.8-35.4)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø36.7 (21.9-44.3)

Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø74.1 (38.3-83.8)

Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø72.3 (33.2-86.5)

Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø60 (27.7-71.7)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø64.6 (36.3-77.6)

软件 - 纯Android ，但版本不对

Teclast 在其网站上宣传Android 14。但我们的测试设备预装了Android 13。

在积极的方面，Teclast T60 积极解决安全问题，在我们的测试设备上提供了截至 2023 年 12 月的最新安全补丁。

该设备提供了简洁的Android 界面，没有任何臃肿的软件或侵入性广告应用程序，给人耳目一新的体验。

此外，Teclast 还获得了 Widevine L1 认证，允许用户享受受拷贝保护内容的高清流媒体--这对于那些优先考虑视频流媒体质量的用户来说是一项值得赞赏的功能。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 也可使用移动无线电

该平板电脑使用 Wi-Fi 5 标准连接到 Wi-Fi 网络。在我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 参考路由器进行的测试中，它达到了大约 300 到 370 MBit/s 的合适传输速率。在整个测试期间，这些传输速率保持相对稳定。

在靠近路由器的地方，信号强度最大，网站加载速度很快。但是，在距离路由器 10 米远的地方，信号指标下降到 50%，网站加载出现明显延迟。

虽然有一些平板电脑，如华为 MatePad 11.5等平板电脑配备了 WiFi 6，可以更好地利用千兆网络连接，但 Teclast T60 的 Wi-Fi 模块整体表现仍然不错。

值得注意的是，这款平板电脑不仅支持 Wi-Fi 连接，还通过一个最高 4G 标准的 WWAN 调制解调器支持移动互联网，还可以打电话。

虽然频率多样性受到一定限制，但在美国使用已足够。在大约三周的测试中，我们定期与高端智能手机进行信号强度比较，结果显示 Teclast T60 的接收质量始终值得称赞。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Huawei MatePad 11.5	846 (507^min - 927^max) MBit/s +174%
Amazon Fire Max 11	391 (385^min - 400^max) MBit/s +27%
Teclast T60	309 (244^min - 321^max) MBit/s
Teclast T40 Air	308 (238^min - 322^max) MBit/s 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	307 (284^min - 322^max) MBit/s -1%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Huawei MatePad 11.5	792 (376^min - 968^max) MBit/s +120%
Amazon Fire Max 11	499 (483^min - 516^max) MBit/s +39%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	369 (179^min - 379^max) MBit/s +3%
Teclast T60	360 (341^min - 370^max) MBit/s
Teclast T40 Air	358 (337^min - 370^max) MBit/s -1%

Teclast T60; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø309 (244-321)

Teclast T60; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø360 (341-370)

Teclast T60 配备了与所有主要卫星网络兼容的跟踪模块。走出室外等待几秒钟，系统就能检测到足够多的卫星，在 3 米范围内确定您的位置。与相同位置的其他设备相比，T60 同时连接的卫星数量要少得多。

在实际测试中，我们用 Garmin Venu 2 智能手表作为对比设备，进行了一次自行车骑行，这种差异就显而易见了。T60 有时会将我们置于与路线平行的错误路径上，有时它记录的路线会穿过前院和房屋。特别是在老城区狭窄的街道上和过桥时，系统经常会完全失去轨迹。

因此，Teclast 平板电脑最适合用来提供大致位置。对于要求绝对精确的导航任务，其他设备可能更适合。

照相机 - 更像是临时的

高品质的拍照性能通常不是平板电脑的强项，不幸的是，Teclast T60 也不例外。它配备了一个相对简单的 1300 万像素后置摄像头，往往能捕捉到动态范围有限、部分色彩失真的模糊图像。

即使在弱光条件下，该摄像头也很难拍摄出清晰的图像，在非常明亮和非常黑暗的区域都只能看到极少的细节。

视频录制功能仅限于 30 帧/秒的最高 1 080p。自动对焦通常需要稍长的调整阶段才能获得真正清晰的图像。

分辨率为 500 万像素的前置摄像头拍摄的图像也有些模糊，偏色明显。

总之，Teclast T60 的摄像头更适合扫描文件或读取二维码等任务，而不能满足苛刻摄影师的期望。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera Pflanze Hauptkamera Umgebung Hauptkamera Low Light

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

即使在摄影棚照明的情况下，主相机在实验室中的表现也相当不精确，会产生斑点，画面笼罩在朦胧的雾气中。

在只有 1 勒克斯照明的情况下，相机只能记录下一些细节，但整体上仍能看清拍摄对象。

ColorChecker Teclast T60: 7.78 ∆E min: 3.03 - max: 15.44 ∆E

配件和保修 - 12 个月保修

Teclast 随平板电脑提供充电器、USB 数据线和 SIM 卡工具。不过，保护套需要单独购买。

关于保修，Teclast 提供 12 个月的有限保修。生产商还承诺在 24 小时内处理和解决问题。

输入设备和操作 - 可进行人脸识别

事实证明，Teclast T60 的触摸屏非常可靠，即使在角落和边缘也是如此。外壳边缘在现代美感和有效保护用户在握持设备时避免无意触屏操作之间取得了良好的平衡。

平板电脑上的物理按键操作完美，触感良好，按压点清晰，方便用户使用。

值得注意的是，Teclast T60 没有配备指纹传感器。生物识别解锁只能通过面部识别来实现。虽然该系统最初在注册用户面部时遇到困难，但第二次尝试就获得了成功，并证明此后的注册过程非常迅速。随后，面部识别系统在短暂的等待后可靠地解锁了平板电脑。

▶ load Youtube video

显示屏 - 屏幕大，但不太明亮

Teclast T60 配备 11.97 英寸显示屏，以 5:3 宽高比提供了充足的屏幕空间。事实证明，这种宽高比是一个不错的选择，因为它可以容纳 16:9 的视频，只有顶部和底部的窄条纹，确保了舒适的观看效果。此外，在宽敞的屏幕上还可以方便地阅读和编辑文档。

尽管屏幕尺寸较大，但 2,000 x 1,200 像素的分辨率足以提供良好的显示效果。

不过，352 cd/m² 的最大亮度相对适中，可能会给在光线明亮的环境中使用带来挑战。相比之下亚马逊 Fire Max 11在这方面的亮度要高得多。


314 cd/m²	339 cd/m²	313 cd/m²
319 cd/m²	352 cd/m²	331 cd/m²
308 cd/m²	330 cd/m²	308 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 352 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 323.8 cd/m² Minimum: 18.4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 352 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.319

	Teclast T60 IPS, 2000x1200, 12"	Teclast T40 Air IPS, 2000x1200, 10.4"	Amazon Fire Max 11 TFT LCD, 2000x1200, 11"	Huawei MatePad 11.5 IPS, 2200x1440, 11.5"	Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 11"
Screen		-206%	-33%	-34%	-5%
Brightness middle	352	319 -9%	564 60%	472 34%	473 34%
Brightness	324	296 -9%	509 57%	432 33%	449 39%
Brightness Distribution	88	85 -3%	86 -2%	86 -2%	85 -3%
Black Level *		0.44	0.4	0.44	0.28
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.6	10.9 -319%	4 -54%	3.4 -31%	3 -15%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.75	19.02 -231%	7.1 -23%	6.6 -15%	6 -4%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.5	11.5 -667%	5 -233%	4.8 -220%	2.7 -80%
Gamma	2.319 ^95%	2.035 ^108%	2.07 ^106%	2.41 ^91%	2.27 ^97%
CCT	6747 ^96%	11482 ^57%	1168 ^557%	7035 ^92%	6589 ^99%
Contrast		725	1410	1073	1689

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在使用分光光度计和 CalMAN 软件进行的测试中，我们发现在 "自动对比度 "模式和暖白平衡下，屏幕上的色彩表现相当准确。色彩准确度非常显著，只有黄色色调有轻微失真，肉眼观察灰度没有明显偏色。

屏幕也没有使用 PWM 来降低屏幕亮度，因此即使是敏感的人也能使用这款平板电脑。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
17.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 9.6 ms rise
17.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 7.7 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
26.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 12.9 ms rise
26.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 13.4 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

由于 Teclast T60 的屏幕反光性强，最大亮度相对较低，因此在室外使用可能具有一定的挑战性。

Teclast T60 的屏幕具有出色的视角稳定性，即使在极平的视角下也能看到清晰的内容。

性能 - 足够的动力

缆线 Unisoc Tiger T616Unisoc Tiger T616 并非高性能 SoC，但足以满足相对流畅的日常使用。虽然 Teclast T60 可能无法无缝处理非常复杂的应用程序，但它非常适合观看视频、了解最新消息和浏览互联网等任务。

值得注意的是，在 Teclast T60 的价格范围内，还有功能更强大的平板电脑，如 MatePad 11.5或亚马逊 Fire Max 11.

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Huawei MatePad 11.5	781 Points +116%
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1887, n=70, last 2 years)	712 Points +97%
Amazon Fire Max 11	702 Points +94%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	384 Points +6%
Teclast T60	361 Points
Average Unisoc T7255 (298 - 380, n=7)	351 Points -3%
Teclast T40 Air	350 Points -3%
Multi-Core
Huawei MatePad 11.5	2854 Points +90%
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=70, last 2 years)	2508 Points +67%
Amazon Fire Max 11	2070 Points +38%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	1684 Points +12%
Teclast T60	1502 Points
Average Unisoc T7255 (1184 - 1502, n=7)	1410 Points -6%
Teclast T40 Air	1387 Points -8%

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (185 - 3715, n=69, last 2 years)	1121 Points +155%
Huawei MatePad 11.5	1059 Points +141%
Amazon Fire Max 11	949 Points +116%
Teclast T60	440 Points
Average Unisoc T7255 (427 - 440, n=4)	434 Points -1%
Teclast T40 Air	427 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	413 Points -6%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (493 - 14690, n=69, last 2 years)	3575 Points +124%
Huawei MatePad 11.5	2970 Points +86%
Amazon Fire Max 11	2363 Points +48%
Teclast T60	1596 Points
Average Unisoc T7255 (1474 - 1606, n=4)	1556 Points -3%
Teclast T40 Air	1474 Points -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	1439 Points -10%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Huawei MatePad 11.5	556242 Points +137%
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1286774, n=48, last 2 years)	469872 Points +100%
Amazon Fire Max 11	311846 Points +33%
Teclast T60	235075 Points
Average Unisoc T7255 (228124 - 235075, n=4)	230591 Points -2%
Teclast T40 Air	228517 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	201810 Points -14%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Huawei MatePad 11.5	10389 Points +30%
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 20841, n=72, last 2 years)	9873 Points +24%
Average Unisoc T7255 (7936 - 8066, n=6)	8004 Points 0%
Teclast T60	7992 Points
Teclast T40 Air	7936 Points -1%
Amazon Fire Max 11	7249 Points -9%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	7068 Points -12%

CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=62, last 2 years)	779 Points +102%
Amazon Fire Max 11	587 Points +52%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	402 Points +4%
Average Unisoc T7255 (382 - 394, n=4)	388 Points +1%
Teclast T60	386 Points
Teclast T40 Air	382 Points -1%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Huawei MatePad 11.5	4784 Points +119%
Average of class Tablet (444 - 11721, n=58, last 2 years)	4238 Points +94%
Amazon Fire Max 11	3263 Points +50%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	2551 Points +17%
Teclast T60	2182 Points
Average Unisoc T7255 (2026 - 2182, n=4)	2095 Points -4%
Teclast T40 Air	2026 Points -7%
System
Huawei MatePad 11.5	9716 Points +89%
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 16435, n=58, last 2 years)	7305 Points +42%
Amazon Fire Max 11	6786 Points +32%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	5580 Points +8%
Teclast T60	5151 Points
Average Unisoc T7255 (4795 - 5151, n=4)	4969 Points -4%
Teclast T40 Air	4959 Points -4%
Memory
Amazon Fire Max 11	6055 Points +86%
Huawei MatePad 11.5	4970 Points +53%
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10977, n=58, last 2 years)	4900 Points +51%
Teclast T60	3255 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	3120 Points -4%
Average Unisoc T7255 (2632 - 3255, n=4)	2941 Points -10%
Teclast T40 Air	2632 Points -19%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (580 - 57192, n=58, last 2 years)	9295 Points +711%
Huawei MatePad 11.5	7739 Points +575%
Amazon Fire Max 11	2501 Points +118%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	2179 Points +90%
Average Unisoc T7255 (1137 - 1173, n=4)	1151 Points 0%
Teclast T60	1146 Points
Teclast T40 Air	1137 Points -1%
Web
Huawei MatePad 11.5	1402 Points +19%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2051, n=58, last 2 years)	1272 Points +8%
Teclast T60	1179 Points
Average Unisoc T7255 (1096 - 1181, n=4)	1148 Points -3%
Teclast T40 Air	1135 Points -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	1116 Points -5%
Amazon Fire Max 11	1103 Points -6%

AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=50, last 2 years)	7290 Points +2171%
Huawei MatePad 11.5	668 Points +108%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	348 Points +8%
Teclast T60	321 Points
Average Unisoc T7255 (292 - 321, n=4)	302 Points -6%
Teclast T40 Air	292 Points -9%
Amazon Fire Max 11	Points -100%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Amazon Fire Max 11	17202 Points +493%
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 74821, n=56, last 2 years)	11456 Points +295%
Huawei MatePad 11.5	9027 Points +211%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	4150 Points +43%
Average Unisoc T7255 (2817 - 4209, n=5)	3157 Points +9%
Teclast T60	2902 Points
Teclast T40 Air	2817 Points -3%

Legend

Teclast T60 Unisoc T7255, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash

Teclast T40 Air Unisoc T7255, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash

Amazon Fire Max 11 MediaTek MT8188J, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei MatePad 11.5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 644, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 128 GB eMMC Flash

Average Unisoc T7255

Average of class Tablet

在图形性能方面，SoC 显然无法与其他同价位的平板电脑相比。这意味着只有基本的基准测试能在原生分辨率的屏幕上流畅运行。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	825 Points +550%
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	310 Points +144%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	127 Points
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	126 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	121 Points -5%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	829 Points +543%
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	320 Points +148%
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	129 Points 0%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	129 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	123 Points -5%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3164 Points +565%
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1078 Points +126%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	574 Points +21%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	476 Points
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	474 Points 0%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3157 Points +559%
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1101 Points +130%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	589 Points +23%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	479 Points
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	474 Points -1%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6367 Points +476%
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2525 Points +128%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1429 Points +29%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	1106 Points
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	1089 Points -2%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7147 Points +663%
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2310 Points +147%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1309 Points +40%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	937 Points
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	927 Points -1%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4608 Points +54%
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	3747 Points +25%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	2990 Points
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	2798 Points -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2105 Points -30%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	63 fps +163%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	60 fps +150%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	37 fps +54%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	24 fps
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	23 fps -4%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	150 fps +500%
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	54 fps +116%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	41 fps +64%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	25 fps
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	24 fps -4%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	58 fps +263%
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	37 fps +131%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	21 fps +31%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	16 fps
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	15 fps -6%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	91 fps +469%
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	34 fps +113%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	22 fps +38%
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	16 fps 0%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	16 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	44 fps +363%
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	23 fps +142%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	14 fps +47%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	9.5 fps
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	9.3 fps -2%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	65 fps +563%
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	22 fps +124%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	15 fps +53%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	9.8 fps
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	9.7 fps -1%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	25 fps +339%
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	13 fps +128%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	7.5 fps +32%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	5.7 fps
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	5.6 fps -2%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	38 fps +523%
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	14 fps +130%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	8.1 fps +33%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	6.1 fps
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	5.9 fps -3%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	18 fps +386%
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	8.7 fps +135%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	5.3 fps +43%
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	3.7 fps 0%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	3.7 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	17 fps +639%
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	5.5 fps +139%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	3.3 fps +43%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	2.3 fps
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	2.2 fps -4%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	30 fps +417%
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	14 fps +141%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	9 fps +55%
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	5.8 fps 0%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	5.8 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	47 fps +658%
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	15 fps +142%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	9.8 fps +58%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	6.2 fps
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	6.1 fps -2%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7.6 fps +676%
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2.3 fps +135%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1.4 fps +43%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	0.98 fps
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	0.95 fps -3%

在互联网浏览器速度测试中，这款平板电脑的表现仅处于中游水平。网页加载速度相当快，浏览图片几乎不需要等待时间。

因此，从速度上看，在 Teclast T60 的大屏幕上进行日常浏览是相当愉快的。

Jetstream 2 | WebXPRT 4 | Speedometer 2.0 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=68, last 2 years)	109.8 Points +95%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (Edge 115)	86.231 Points +53%
Amazon Fire Max 11 (Chrome 116.0.5845.114)	74.31 Points +32%
Teclast T60 (Chrome 120)	56.281 Points
Teclast T40 Air (Chrome 119)	53.27 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)	52.9 Points -6%
Average Unisoc T7255 (45.4 - 57.2, n=5)	52 Points -8%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=67, last 2 years)	105.2 Points +75%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (Edge 115)	91 Points +52%
Amazon Fire Max 11 (Chrome 116.0.5845.114)	75 Points +25%
Teclast T60 (Chrome 120)	60 Points
Teclast T40 Air (Chrome 119)	58 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)	57 Points -5%
Average Unisoc T7255 (45 - 60, n=4)	55 Points -8%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=62, last 2 years)	116.9 runs/min +163%
Amazon Fire Max 11 (Chrome 116.0.5845.114)	65.6 runs/min +48%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (Edge 115)	61.5 runs/min +39%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)	53.5 runs/min +20%
Teclast T60 (Chrome 120)	44.4 runs/min
Teclast T40 Air (Chrome 119)	40.5 runs/min -9%
Average Unisoc T7255 (34.4 - 46.6, n=5)	40.4 runs/min -9%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (Edge 115)	30021 Points +96%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=85, last 2 years)	28868 Points +89%
Amazon Fire Max 11 (Chrome 116.0.5845.114)	24222 Points +58%
Teclast T60 (Chrome 120)	15304 Points
Teclast T40 Air (Chrome 119)	14522 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 120)	14279 Points -7%
Average Unisoc T7255 (12141 - 15304, n=5)	14092 Points -8%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=73, last 2 years)	3794 ms * -46%
Average Unisoc T7255 (2531 - 3014, n=4)	2711 ms * -5%
Teclast T40 Air (Chrome 119)	2708.7 ms * -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)	2650.1 ms * -2%
Teclast T60 (Chrome 120)	2592 ms *
Amazon Fire Max 11 (Chrome 116.0.5845.114)	1831.1 ms * +29%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (Edge 115)	1365.8 ms * +47%

* ... smaller is better

尽管 Teclast T60 拥有充足的大容量存储空间，但访问速度相对较慢。即使与其他采用 eMMC 闪存的平板电脑相比，该平板电脑的访问速度也非常低，落后于以下设备华为 MatePad 11.5等使用 UFS 2.2 内存的设备。

用户可能会经历较长的加载时间和较慢的数据传输。

	Teclast T60	Teclast T40 Air	Amazon Fire Max 11	Huawei MatePad 11.5	Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	Average 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		5%	-31%	359%	44%	1%	219%
Sequential Read 256KB	240.4	270.7 13%	299.4 25%	1037.71 332%	297.47 24%	272 ?(240 - 297, n=5) 13%	1055 ?(163 - 3912, n=73, last 2 years) 339%
Sequential Write 256KB	230	246.2 7%	78.21 -66%	903.32 293%	228.97 0%	221 ?(149.5 - 253, n=5) -4%	692 ?(78.2 - 3154, n=73, last 2 years) 201%
Random Read 4KB	76.4	76.3 0%	81.85 7%	297.25 289%	102.41 34%	81.3 ?(61.7 - 100, n=5) 6%	191 ?(18.4 - 451, n=73, last 2 years) 150%
Random Write 4KB	67.5	67.8 0%	8.23 -88%	418.84 521%	146.92 118%	61 ?(9.4 - 92.2, n=5) -10%	191.4 ?(8.23 - 555, n=73, last 2 years) 184%

游戏--朴实无华的游戏

在平板电脑上进行的游戏测试中，我们注意到 Teclast 的设备无法使用GameBench 的基准软件。的基准软件，因此无法达到特定的帧率。

尽管如此，从观察到的游戏设置来看，显然不应该期待高性能。在《PUBG Mobile》等游戏中，即使在非常低的设置下，也不可能选择超过 40 帧/秒的帧率。玄心冲击》允许最高 60 帧/秒，但在这一水平下实现流畅的性能似乎具有挑战性，因为偶尔会出现生涩的行为。

因此，Teclast T60 更适合功耗要求较低的玩家和主要从事休闲游戏的玩家。

No graph data

排放 - Teclast T60 没有节流功能

温度

即使在长时间负载的情况下，Teclast T60 外壳的最高温度也仅为 33.8 °C（92.84 °F）。虽然这一温度略微明显，但绝对不会令人感到不适。

此外，3DMark 压力测试显示出非常均匀的曲线，表明即使在长时间的高负荷使用情况下，也不会出现节流问题。

Max. Load

Idle


31.6 °C	33.8 °C	28.8 °C
31.1 °C	30 °C	29.1 °C
30.2 °C	28.9 °C	28.4 °C

Maximum: 33.8 °C
Average: 30.2 °C


29.1 °C	33.8 °C	33.6 °C
29.3 °C	30.6 °C	30 °C
28.3 °C	28.8 °C	29.3 °C

Maximum: 33.8 °C
Average: 30.3 °C

Power Supply (max.) 40.6 °C | Room Temperature 20.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.87 (2.85-2.87)

Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.85 (2.84-2.86)

Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø6.6 (6.58-6.62)

Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø18.8 (18.8-18.9)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.5 (3.49-3.5)

Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.787 (0.742-0.833)

Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.775 (0.732-0.818)

Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø1.924 (1.907-1.936)

Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø4.94 (4.94-4.96)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.726 (0.72-0.741)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.52 (3.52-3.53)

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Huawei MatePad 11.5	99.5 (4.94^min - 4.96^max) % +12%
Amazon Fire Max 11	98.5 (1.907^min - 1.936^max) % +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	97.3 (0.72^min - 0.741^max) % +9%
Teclast T40 Air	89.6 (0.732^min - 0.818^max) % +1%
Teclast T60	89.1 (0.742^min - 0.833^max) %
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Huawei MatePad 11.5	99.7 (18.8^min - 18.9^max) % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	99.6 (3.49^min - 3.5^max) % 0%
Amazon Fire Max 11	99.5 (6.58^min - 6.62^max) % 0%
Teclast T60	99.4 (2.85^min - 2.87^max) %
Teclast T40 Air	99.1 (2.84^min - 2.86^max) % 0%
Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	99.9 (3.52^min - 3.53^max) %

Legend

Teclast T60 Unisoc T7255, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash

Teclast T40 Air Unisoc T7255, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash

Amazon Fire Max 11 MediaTek MT8188J, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei MatePad 11.5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 644, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 128 GB eMMC Flash

扬声器

据供应商称，这款平板电脑包含四个扬声器。最大音量足够大，不过在大环境下可能会有点太安静。
当音量开到最大时，我们会注意到高音有时会听起来令人不愉快地过分强调，但总体而言，在平板电脑上播放视频和音乐的音质都不错。

对于那些追求最佳音质的用户，Teclast T60 允许通过 USB-C 或蓝牙 5.0 连接耳机或外置扬声器。这款平板电脑支持主要的无线音频编解码器，支持 LDAC 和 aptX HD，用户可以享受高保真音乐。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Teclast T60 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 为大型电池充电，功率为 20 瓦

耗电量

与其他同类平板电脑相比，Teclast T60 在闲置模式下的耗电量较低。尽管屏幕更大，但即使在中高负载情况下，它的能耗也更低。

这款平板电脑的充电功率最高可达 20 瓦，从 0 到 100% 的完整充电周期需要 2:30 小时。我们测试的所有充电器，即使是其他生产商生产的充电器，都能完美地与平板电脑配合使用。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	1.2 / 1.4 / 1.7 Watt
Load	4.2 / 9.5 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Teclast T60 8000 mAh	Teclast T40 Air 7200 mAh	Amazon Fire Max 11 7500 mAh	Huawei MatePad 11.5 7700 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8000 mAh
Power Consumption		-0%	-85%	-114%	-93%
Idle Minimum *	1.2	1.2 -0%	1.04 13%	1.23 -3%	0.63 47%
Idle Average *	1.4	1.3 7%	4.25 -204%	4.44 -217%	4.25 -204%
Idle Maximum *	1.7	1.5 12%	4.3 -153%	4.49 -164%	4.34 -155%
Load Average *	4.2	5.6 -33%	7.62 -81%	11.2 -167%	10.24 -144%
Load Maximum *	9.5	8.4 12%	9.69 -2%	11.32 -19%	10.47 -10%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Teclast T60: Ø6.8 (4.25-10.2)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Teclast T60; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.59 (5.39-6.38)

Teclast T60; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.256 (1.129-1.568)

运行时间

Teclast T60 配备 8,000 mAh 大容量电池。它在运行时间方面优于众多相关设备：

例如，用户可以连续上网 18 小时 16 分钟，然后才需要插入电源。此外，由于运行时间长达 19 小时 5 分钟，用户还可以在电量耗尽之前观看存储在平板电脑中的大量电影。

此外，对于游戏发烧友来说，这款平板电脑在充电前可提供 4 个多小时的游戏乐趣。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		55h 13min
WiFi Websurfing		18h 16min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		19h 05min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 9min

	Teclast T60 8000 mAh	Teclast T40 Air 7200 mAh	Amazon Fire Max 11 7500 mAh	Huawei MatePad 11.5 7700 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8000 mAh
Battery Runtime		-9%	-11%	-25%	0%
Reader / Idle	3313	2805 -15%	2383 -28%	1702 -49%	4236 28%
H.264	1145	1020 -11%	1188 4%	874 -24%	997 -13%
WiFi v1.3	1096	918 -16%	988 -10%	866 -21%	1017 -7%
Load	249	262 5%	228 -8%	237 -5%	231 -7%

Pros

+ Widevine L1

+ 纯净Android

+ 高品质金属外壳

+ 运行时间长

+ 存储空间大

+ 发热小

+ LTE 调制解调器

+ 格式良好的大屏幕

+ 无 PWM 闪烁

Cons

- 广告中使用（仍然）不存在的Android 14

- 屏幕暗淡

- 相机性能一般

- 定位不准确

- 无指纹识别器

评价 - 室内使用效果良好，室外使用效果一般。

事实上，我们的综合测试显示，Teclast T60 在各方面都表现出色：

近 12 英寸的屏幕大小适中，提供了足够的观看空间。与同类设备相比，该平板电脑拥有更大的存储容量，其电池可提供充足的电量，因此运行时间高于平均水平。

几个小细节造就了这款平板电脑在这些方面的良好表现。窄边的现代屏幕设计使设备体积小巧，却拥有超大显示屏。没有臃肿的软件和广告软件，确保用户有足够的空间存放自己的文件。此外，该平板电脑的低功耗也为其令人印象深刻的续航能力做出了贡献。

不过，它也有缺点。与其他平板电脑相比，它的屏幕亮度不够，摄像头最适合用来拍摄快照或二维码，整体系统性能充其量只能算一般。跟踪精度也不尽如人意。

Teclast T60 是任何家庭办公室或起居室的理想之选。尽管它配备了蜂窝调制解调器，但由于屏幕较暗、定位跟踪不准确，因此不太适合在户外使用。

速度明显更快的华为 MatePad 11.5，不过由于没有谷歌服务，它在软件方面受到限制。另一个选择是亚马逊 Fire Max 11，它提供了明亮的显示屏，但也有亚马逊软件的局限性。

价格和供应情况

Teclast T60 的官方售价 269 美元。

Teclast T60 - 01/15/2024 v7 ^(old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis

82 / 98 → 83%

Keyboard

69 / 80 → 87%

Pointing Device

83%

Connectivity

44 / 70 → 63%

Weight

82 / 40-88 → 88%

Battery

92%

Display

86%

Games Performance

11 / 78 → 14%

Application Performance

63 / 92 → 68%

Temperature

94%

Noise

100%

Audio

68 / 91 → 74%

Camera

50 / 85 → 58%

Average

71%

81%

Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.