Tecno Spark 20 Pro+ 智能手机评测--出人意料的出色摄像头，售价不到 200 欧元
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Storage | Dimensions | Resolution | Starting price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 81.2 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | Tecno Spark 20 Pro+ Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2 | 179 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.78" | 2436x1080 | |
| 81.9 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2022 | Motorola Moto G72 Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2 | 166 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.60" | 2400x1080 | |
| 78.9 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2022 | Xiaomi Poco M5 Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2 | 201 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.58" | 2408x1080 | |
| 80.2 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G SD 685, Adreno 610 | 188.5 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 |
底盘和规格 - 纤薄而现代
Tecno Spark 20 Pro+ 是一款非常纤薄的手机，厚度仅为 7.6 毫米（0.30 英寸）（不包括相机模块）。圆润的侧面和纤薄的边框使手机看起来更加纤薄。考虑到屏幕尺寸，该设备的重量也相当轻，仅为 179 克（0.39 磅）。Spark 20 Pro+ 的手感很好，除了一些粗糙的边缘外，做工质量也不错。机身非常坚固，最多只能轻微下压。
我们的绿色 Tecno Spark 20 Pro+ 由制造商提供，用于评测目的，机身背部采用褶皱处理，在摄像头模块的同一高度有装饰性的浮雕缝线细节。相比之下，黑色、白色和金色机型则没有采用合成皮革，而是采用了亮面或磨砂面。
所有配色的相机模块都是圆形的，并明显偏向左侧。虽然对称设计的粉丝们可能不会感到满意，但它却让这款手机与众不同。显示屏周围的纤细边框也为手机增添了现代感。
大约 200 欧元（216 美元）的价格就能获得 256 GB 的存储空间和 8 GB 内存。该手机配备了 NFC 功能，但没有专用的音频接口。您必须使用 USB-C 端口来获得有线音频。
Spark 20 Pro+ 最多可使用 2 张 SIM 卡，但没有用于存储扩展的 microSD 插槽。
连接、软件和操作 - 有Android 14
Tecno Spark 20 Pro+ 配备了 WiFi 5，因此与其他同类手机不相上下。我们在参考路由器（华硕 ROG Rapture AXE 11000）的帮助下对无线传输速度进行了评估，结果与竞争对手处于同一水平。在整个测试过程中，除了开始时接收速率稍弱外，速度也相当稳定。
Tecno 手机支持 4G，并支持多种基本频率。这意味着您可以在中欧地区顺利使用这款手机。不过，如果您想去更远的地方旅行，则应检查手机是否能连接到目的地国家的 LTE 网络。在大约两周的测试期间，手机的接收效果不错，但无法与高端手机的信号强度相媲美。
操作系统名为 HiOS 13.6，基于Android 14。在本次评测期间，安全补丁的日期是 2023 年 12 月，因此仍然是合理的最新版本。此外，开箱即用的第三方应用程序也需要处理，不过卸载起来非常容易。前置摄像头周围有一个类似于Apple动态岛的功能。它只在需要时才显示，并提供额外的信息，例如，当你通过人脸识别解锁手机时。
在欧洲，由于 Tecno Mobile 仍未在该地区设立官方分支机构，因此在保修和维修方面可能会出现问题。零售商仍然是寻求帮助的唯一途径。
120Hz 屏幕每秒可记录 240 次触摸输入。因此，除了使用准确、边角灵敏之外，它的响应速度也非常快。如果需要，你甚至可以根据自己的喜好调整滚动和动画效果。
指纹扫描仪是隐形的，隐藏在显示屏后面。一旦手指被注册，扫描仪就能非常快速、可靠地检测到它。人脸识别也能可靠地工作，但这种方法并不完全安全，因为它没有 3D 传感器。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi Poco M5 | |
| Tecno Spark 20 Pro+ | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G | |
| Motorola Moto G72 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi Poco M5 | |
| Motorola Moto G72 | |
| Tecno Spark 20 Pro+ | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G | |
相机 - 性价比高，图像质量好
在 Spark 20 Pro+ 的摄像头设置方面，Tecno 将重点放在了 1.08 亿像素的主摄像头上。虽然相机模块看起来有四个镜头开口，但仔细观察你会发现其中一个是完全密封的。另外两个摄像头包括一个像素很低的辅助摄像头，用于拍摄人像景深效果，还有一个微距摄像头，同样只能拍摄出像素很低的图像。
虽然没有超广角摄像头，但就这款手机的价格而言，主摄像头拍摄的照片还是相当不错的。我们喜欢照片的清晰度，而且细节水平略高于同价位的其他手机。你不能指望用这款手机拍摄出高端照片；图像的某些部分还可以更有活力。但总体而言，对于一款售价 200 欧元的手机来说，照片的质量还是很高的。
尽管在弱光环境下照片的暗部几乎看不出任何东西，但整体清晰度还是不错的。在我们的实验室中，在可控的照明条件下进行的测试也非常顺利：在全棚照明下只有轻微的对比度问题。尽管颗粒感更强、更模糊，但在 1 勒克斯下拍摄的图像仍然相当清晰可读。
3200 万像素的前置摄像头可拍摄出清晰的自拍照，放大也不成问题。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera: plantMain camera: surroundingsMain camera: low light
显示屏 - 明亮，但校准不是很好
Tecno Spark 20 Pro+ 配备了一块分辨率为全高清+的 AMOLED 显示屏，对角线为 6.78 英寸，尺寸相对较大。在明亮的环境中并启用环境光传感器后，它的峰值平均亮度高达 906 cd/m²。这意味着您也可以在手机上欣赏 HDR 内容。
在使用分光光度计进行测量时，我们使用了 "原色 "设置，该设置在 AMOLED 显示屏上显示出柔和的色彩。即便如此，CalMAN 软件还是显示出了略高的色差，尤其是鲜艳的色调。在浅灰色时甚至会出现明显的蓝色色调。
该显示屏能以高达 120Hz 的频率运行，在重现快速运动时不会出现卡顿，并能提供快速的响应时间。PWM 闪烁在亮度较低时尤为明显，会使敏感的人难以使用屏幕。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 942 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.38 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
138.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.257
| Tecno Spark 20 Pro+ AMOLED, 2436x1080, 6.8" | Motorola Moto G72 P-OLED, 2400x1080, 6.6" | Xiaomi Poco M5 IPS, 2408x1080, 6.6" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | 63% | -422% | 116% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 5.7 ? | 1.5 ? 74% | 33 ? -479% | 2.2 ? 61% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 4.3 ? | 1.5 ? 65% | 20 ? -365% | 1.6 ? 63% |
| PWM Frequency | 119.9 | 180 50% | 389.2 225% | |
| Screen | 5% | 15% | 36% | |
| Brightness middle | 942 | 992 5% | 400 -58% | 940 0% |
| Brightness | 906 | 980 8% | 396 -56% | 922 2% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 92 -1% | 96 3% | 96 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.27 | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.38 | 4.56 -4% | 1.26 71% | 1.2 73% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.9 | 7.96 -15% | 2.45 64% | 2.28 67% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.7 | 3.1 34% | 1.5 68% | 1.4 70% |
| Gamma | 2.257 97% | 2.233 99% | 2.298 96% | 2.27 97% |
| CCT | 7668 85% | 7098 92% | 6658 98% | 6503 100% |
| Contrast | 1481 | |||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 34% /
24% | -204% /
-94% | 76% /
63% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 5.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 119.9 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 119.9 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 119.9 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能、排放和电池寿命 - 同类产品中的典型功率
Tecno Spark 20 Pro+ 配备了 Mediathek Helio G99- 在这个价位的手机中，Helio G99 是一款很受欢迎的 SoC，其性能足以保证系统的流畅运行。只有在运行要求较高的应用程序时，它才会开始卡顿。
如今，这个价位的大多数手机都配备了 UFS 2.2 存储系统。Tecno Spark 20 Pro+ 也是如此。内置存储可实现相当快的数据传输速度和相当短的应用程序加载时间。
在长时间负载的情况下，手机表面会明显发热，温度高达 41.1°C（106°F）。不过这并不令人担忧。3DMark 压力测试显示，即使在持续负载的情况下，手机的性能也不会受到影响：即使在运行 20 次之后，手机仍然能达到相同的帧速率。
Spark 20 Pro+ 配备的立体声扬声器音量适中，但整体听起来相当平衡。即使在最大音量下也不会出现削波现象，音质绝对饱满。当然，你不应该指望它们能带来真正的低音。如果你想听到低音，就必须通过 USB-C 端口或蓝牙连接外置扬声器或耳机。手机支持多种无线音频传输编解码器，包括 LHDC V5 和 Opus 等尖端编解码器。这意味着可以传输高保真音频。
内置电池容量为 5,000 mAh，对于大多数现代智能手机来说，这是一个相当标准的容量。在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中，Spark 20 Pro+ 的续航时间为 15 小时 46 分钟，与其他同类手机相当。该设备的充电功率高达 33 瓦，因此只需不到两个小时就能充满电。
| Tecno Spark 20 Pro+ | Motorola Moto G72 | Xiaomi Poco M5 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G | Average 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -12% | 7% | -14% | -5% | 55% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 999.6 | 868.5 -13% | 976.4 -2% | 909.8 -9% | 887 ? -11% | 1839 ? 84% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 781.3 | 497.5 -36% | 870.7 11% | 606.3 -22% | 694 ? -11% | 1425 ? 82% |
| Random Read 4KB | 219.4 | 231.4 5% | 247.6 13% | 177.1 -19% | 228 ? 4% | 277 ? 26% |
| Random Write 4KB | 242.6 | 230.2 -5% | 257.8 6% | 228 -6% | 238 ? -2% | 309 ? 27% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.1 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Wild Life Stress Test
Tecno Spark 20 Pro+ audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| Average of class Smartphone (476 - 3244, n=202, last 2 years) | |
| Tecno Spark 20 Pro+ | |
| Motorola Moto G72 | |
| Xiaomi Poco M5 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G | |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 小价格高品质手机
Tecno Spark 20 Pro+ 给我们带来了惊喜。不到 200 欧元（约合 216 美元）的价格就能获得足够大的存储空间以及能够拍摄清晰图像和精彩自拍的相机系统。即使在光线不足的情况下，相机也能拍摄出可接受的照片。该设备拥有明亮的 OLED 屏幕和出色的扬声器。
这款手机不算太重，圆润的机身和纤薄的边框使其外观更具现代感。做工质量扎实，但从一些粗糙的边缘可以看出，Spark 20 Pro+ 的价格并不昂贵。
您可能还会对缺少 microSD 卡插槽和超宽摄像头感到不满，而这几乎是这个价位手机的标准配置。尽管如此，从整体上看，这款手机仍然是一款不错的产品。不过，欧洲和北美地区的消费者还是应该注意保修问题。
Tecno Spark 20 Pro+ 价格实惠，但丝毫没有廉价感：摄像头、明亮的显示屏和现代的设计令人信服。
最近发布的 小米Redmi Note 13 4G但它的电池续航时间稍短。
价格和供应情况
Tecno Spark 20 Pro+ 目前在欧洲和北美很难买到。您可以访问官方产品页面了解更多信息。
Tecno Spark 20 Pro+
- 02/20/2024 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
