Notebookcheck Logo

联想ThinkPad T14s G2 Intel评测。尽管是16:9的格式,但却是一台非常好的商务笔记本电脑

以旧的格式重新设计。

尽管联想从头更新了ThinkPad T系列的高端型号,但联想ThinkPad T14s第二代仍然保持了16:9的格式,与当前的显示趋势背道而驰。它仍然取得了非常好的成绩,这主要归功于出色的输入设备和装备。
Business ThinkPad Thunderbolt Tiger Lake Ultrabook Windows Intel Evo

ThinkPad T14s系列可能属于最受欢迎的ThinkPad型号。这并不奇怪,因为ThinkPad T14的更薄的表弟与X1 Carbon非常相似,同时仍然更实惠。此外,ThinkPad T14s还可使用AMD处理器,与X1 Carbon形成鲜明对比。

但我们今天没有测试这个版本,因为联想首先向市场推出了ThinkPad T14s第二代,配备英特尔处理器。我们的测试装置包含英特尔酷睿i7处理器,1TB固态硬盘存储,16GB内存,以及全高清低功耗显示屏,成本约为2080欧元(约合2476美元)。在这个价格上,很明显,ThinkPad T14s G2在公司的商务笔记本的较高细分市场上竞争,我们也相应地选择了竞争对手进行比较。

Possible Competitors for Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
89.4 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2021
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.3 kg16.14 mm14.00"1920x1080
88.8 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2021
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE
i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620
1.3 kg16.1 mm14.00"1920x1080
90.5 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2020
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00
R7 PRO 4750U, Vega 7
1.3 kg16.1 mm14.00"1920x1080
90.3 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2021
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.2 kg14.9 mm14.00"3840x2400
88.2 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2021
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
R7 PRO 4750U, Vega 7
1.4 kg17.9 mm14.00"1920x1080
88.9 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2020
Dell Latitude 7410
i7-10610U, UHD Graphics 620
1.4 kg19.3 mm14.00"3840x2160
Processor
Intel Core i7-1165G7 4 x 2.8 - 4.7 GHz, 55 W PL2 / Short Burst, 40 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake-UP3
Memory
16 GB 
, LPDDR4X-4266, on-board, quad-channel
Display
14.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, NE140FHM-N61, IPS LED, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel Tiger Lake-UP3 PCH-LP
Storage
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, 1024 GB 
, M.2 2280, NVMe PCIe 3.0 x4, 898 GB free
Soundcard
Realtek ALC3287
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio port, 1 SmartCard, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Intel Ethernet Connection I219-V (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2, Quectel EM120R-GL, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 16.14 x 327.5 x 224
Battery
57 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p w/IR & ThinkShutter
Additional features
Speakers: 2 W stereo, Keyboard: 6 row chiclet, full size, 1.5 mm key travel, Keyboard Light: yes, 65 W USB-C charger , Lenovo Commercial Vantage, 36 Months Warranty
Weight
1.306 kg, Power Supply: 372 g
Price
2080 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳:ThinkPad T14s 2021,经典黑色

联想ThinkPad T14s第二代
联想ThinkPad T14s第二代

在更轻薄、更优质的T系列与 联想ThinkPad T490s联想ThinkPad T14s第二代采用了全新的设计平台,现在也该是重新设计的时候了。 ThinkPad T14s第1代.新的ThinkPad笔记本的外观看起来与上一代完全不同,至少如果你购买了 "风暴灰 "的铝制型号。由于该型号目前在欧洲还没有上市,我们看到的是经典黑色的型号。

在新机型中,黑色略显明亮,更倾向于深灰色,现在盖子背面还有一个银色的联想标志。机盖内有更多变化。扬声器现在被放在键盘上方的显眼位置。紧挨着扬声器的是电源按钮,现在还包括一个指纹识别器。此外,联想还调整了键盘下方掌托的形状,以整合新的、扁平的TrackPoint按钮。一如既往,红色的TrackPoint、银色的铰链和ThinkPad的标志形成了多彩的点缀。

与前代产品相比,触觉有了些许变化,因为联想改变了黑色的表面覆盖层,这应该是为了减少指纹和污渍的出现。这一点做得相当好,而且表面层比上一代产品略微磨砂,抓地力也更强。 ThinkPad T14s第一代.表面以下的材料也显示出一种变化:外壳底部现在由铝而不是镁制成。掌托和显示屏盖仍然分别由镁和碳纤维制成。不同材料的组合确保了高度--尽管不是完美的--稳定性。ThinkPad T14s 2021可以很好地抵御对掌托的压力,并且可以很好地抵御对显示屏背面的压力。 通过向相反的方向推拉,机箱的底部可以轻微扭曲,显示屏盖子也是如此。

铰链没有任何抱怨的理由,允许打开的角度高达180度。显示屏可以用一根手指抬起来,金属铰链将显示屏紧紧地固定在那里。

在尺寸和重量方面,与前者相比几乎没有任何变化。 ThinkPad T14s 第一代.这意味着,联想ThinkPad T14s第二代仍然较大,但也比ThinkPad T14s第二代更薄更轻。 戴尔Latitude 7410HP EliteBook 845 G7.另一方面,T14s 2021明显被以下产品超越X1 Carbon 9代,它更轻、更薄,也没有那么宽,由于其16:10的格式,其显示屏边框也大大减少。特别是液晶显示器下面的大框架看起来很老化--很遗憾联想没有利用这个机会改变格式。

Size Comparison

329 mm 225.8 mm 16.1 mm 1.3 kg327.5 mm 224 mm 16.14 mm 1.3 kg324 mm 215 mm 17.9 mm 1.4 kg321.4 mm 208.7 mm 19.3 mm 1.4 kg315 mm 221.6 mm 14.9 mm 1.2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

联想T14s G2的广泛设备选择

隐藏在LCD后面SIM卡槽旁边的microSD读卡器从联想ThinkPad T14s第二代中被彻底丢弃,没有任何替换。但除此之外,联想保持了众多的连接。两个雷电4端口是新的--在前代产品中,两个USB-C端口中只有一个与雷电3兼容,而且由于通过两条PCIe通道连接,它还被限制在20Gbit/s。随着向Thunderbolt 4的转变,这一限制被移除。

右边:智能卡阅读器,USB-A 3.2 Gen 1,Kensington锁
右边:智能卡阅读器,USB-A 3.2 Gen 1,Kensington锁
左边:2个Thunderbolt 4,miniEthernet/扩展坞端口,HDMI 2.0,USB-A 3.2 Gen 1,3.5毫米音频
左边:2个Thunderbolt 4,miniEthernet/扩展坞端口,HDMI 2.0,USB-A 3.2 Gen 1,3.5毫米音频

沟通

联想ThinkPad T14s第二代是我们正在测试的第一批带有Wi-Fi 6e的联想ThinkPads之一。在这种情况下,它采用了英特尔无线AX210 2x2卡的形式。与我们的Wi-Fi 6路由器相结合,ThinkPad笔记本电脑取得了非常好的结果,使其在我们的测试领域处于领先地位。

除了支持蓝牙5.2的Wi-Fi模块外,联想ThinkPad T14s 2021还包含一个英特尔的以太网芯片,可以通过专有的迷你以太网连接使用。我们的联想测试装置还包括一个标签为Quectel EM120R-GL的WWAN模块。虽然这支持4G LTE,但也可以选择5G LTE。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1598 (1496min - 1654max) MBit/s
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1459 (1241min - 1512max) MBit/s -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1270 (656min - 1344max) MBit/s -21%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
  (675 - 1602, n=27)
1166 MBit/s -27%
Dell Latitude 7410
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1030 (815min - 1184max) MBit/s -36%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
929 (407min - 961max) MBit/s -42%
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
838 (473min - 942max) MBit/s -48%
iperf3 receive AX12
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1716 (1632min - 1754max) MBit/s
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1611 (1332min - 1735max) MBit/s -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1370 (1218min - 1490max) MBit/s -20%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
  (914 - 1716, n=27)
1309 MBit/s -24%
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1257 (1103min - 1325max) MBit/s -27%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1256 (1036min - 1306max) MBit/s -27%
Dell Latitude 7410
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1235 (1149min - 1323max) MBit/s -28%
149615861676Tooltip
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1716 (1632-1754)
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1598 (1496-1654)

网络摄像头

尽管在ThinkPad T14s第二代中,联想首次在T系列的ThinkPad笔记本电脑中提供了一个1080p的摄像头,但我们的测试装置包含一个720p的网络摄像头。这提供了典型的性能,有颗粒感和模糊的图像以及扭曲的颜色。为了在视频会议中获得相当可接受的图像质量,光线条件必须完美。

ColorChecker
12.4 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
10 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
20.1 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
27.3 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
26.3 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
12 ∆E
22.4 ∆E
27.7 ∆E
32.5 ∆E
27.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE: 17.82 ∆E min: 4.53 - max: 32.53 ∆E

安全问题

联想ThinkPad T14s G2:指纹识别器集成在电源键上
联想ThinkPad T14s G2:指纹识别器集成在电源键上

众多的安全功能是真正的商务笔记本电脑的典型特征。虽然指纹读取器目前也是私人客户笔记本电脑的标准配置,但将读取器集成到电源按钮中的事实对于ThinkPad T14s G2来说是全新的。这意味着在打开笔记本电脑时,指纹已经被直接注册。作为登录的另一个选择,还有用于Windows Hello的红外摄像头。除此之外,我们的测试装置还有一个用于Kensington锁和智能卡阅读器的插槽。网络摄像头还配备了一个机械盖。我们的测试设备没有提供的一个可选功能是ThinkPad隐私保护显示器,它有一个内置的过滤器,可以保护它不被不必要的人看到。

辅料

除了带有USB-C充电器的65瓦电源,没有其他配件。除了USB-C和Thunderbolt 4扩展坞,联想还提供专有扩展坞,如ThinkPad Ultra Dock.虽然这些对接站自2018年以来一直在使用,并被现代的雷电4码头所超越,但拥有现有设备的大型企业客户仍会对其感到高兴。

维护

联想ThinkPad T14s第二代的底板可以很容易地拆下来。首先拧下五颗飞利浦螺钉,然后留在铝制底板上,你只需打开联想笔记本电脑背面的两个夹子,就能取下底板。

该机型的一个缺点是升级选项不多。不仅内存被焊接在英特尔版本的ThinkPad T14s G2上,而且Wi-Fi模块也不能被替换。你只能更新固态硬盘,当然也可以清洗风扇或更换内部电池。有趣的是,WWAN天线被放置在这个模型的底座上--就像在 ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9 - 但Wi-Fi天线仍像以前一样在显示屏盖子上。键盘不能轻易更换,因为你只有在拆下主板后才能接触到它。易于更换的键盘是ThinkPad T14 G2的优势之一。 键盘是ThinkPad T14 G2和ThinkPad X13 G2的优势之一。

联想ThinkPad T14s G2。铝制底板
联想ThinkPad T14s G2。铝制底板
联想ThinkPad T14s G2。内部观察
联想ThinkPad T14s G2。内部观察

担保

联想ThinkPad T14s G2为您提供36个月的厂商支持。联想提供取回服务,笔记本由联想取回,然后在服务中心进行维修。在支付额外费用后,你还可以将ThinkPad的保修期延长至五年,或购买现场服务、事故保护或更长的电池保修期(36个月而不是12个月)。

ThinkPad T14s G2输入设备。 1.5毫米行程和全宽

键盘

完全更新的键盘也是新设计的一部分。行程从1.8毫米减少到1.5毫米,按键的高度也比以前小。原则上,新的键盘实际上100%地对应于 ThinkPad X1 Carbon第八代就其规格而言。与之相反的是 ThinkPad X1 Carbon 9代,联想ThinkPad T14s第二代的键盘继续使用29厘米(约11.4英寸)的全宽。

这个chicony键盘的质量是迄今为止所有新的2021年ThinkPad设计中最好的。尽管减少的笔划在这里也是明显的,但打字的体验仍然很好,键盘绝对适合经常打字的人使用。

联想ThinkPad T14s G2:键盘区
联想ThinkPad T14s G2:键盘区

触摸板

在重新设计的ThinkPad T14s第二代中,联想将触摸板加宽了1.5厘米(约0.6英寸),因此它现在的尺寸为11.5×6厘米(约4.5×2.4英寸)。另一方面,在材料方面一切保持不变,你会在ThinkPad T14s G2笔记本电脑中寻找到玻璃的脉络,因为触摸板表面是由光滑的塑料制成。虽然玻璃肯定会提供更高的质量,但触摸板绝不是坏的,它的工作做得很好。

带有红色橡胶帽的TrackPoint和触摸板上方的相应按键效果更好。在T14s第二代中,TrackPoint的按键现在是平的,而且伊兰TrackPoint的高度只有3毫米(约0.12英寸)。然而,这些调整并没有对ThinkPad的TrackPoint质量产生负面影响,特别是在拖放功能方面,指点杆的表现更加出色。

联想ThinkPad T14s G2。触摸板
联想ThinkPad T14s G2。触摸板
联想ThinkPad T14s G2。TrackPoint
联想ThinkPad T14s G2。TrackPoint

ThinkPad T14s的低功耗显示屏并没有完全覆盖sRGB

联想ThinkPad T14s第二代的子像素网格
联想ThinkPad T14s第二代的子像素网格
几乎没有任何背光渗漏(这里描绘的是放大的)。
几乎没有任何背光渗漏(这里描绘的是放大的)。

如果有一个变化最小的领域,那肯定是联想ThinkPad T14s第二代的LCD选项。与X1系列的高端ThinkPad相比,更薄的T型号保持了14英寸16:9格式。对于一个几乎是高端的机型来说,这是一个奇怪的决定。显示器方面只有一个变化。最实惠的全高清液晶显示器选项(1920 x 1080像素)的亮度从250cd/m²升级到300cd/m²。你可以在我们的评论中找到其余的LCD选项 联想ThinkPad T14(除了T14s从未提供的1366 x 768像素分辨率的TN高清面板)。)

我们的测试装置使用了京东方的低功耗LCD。平均亮度为397 cd/m²,几乎没有达到规定的400 cd/m²的亮度值。糟糕的响应时间是低功率LCD的典型特征,比如这里使用的是低功率LCD,但这在办公室使用时应该不会造成任何较大的问题。尽管该显示器确实使用了PWM,但频率太高,不会给任何用户带来头痛。

389.6
cd/m²
387.9
cd/m²
395.6
cd/m²
386.8
cd/m²
422.9
cd/m²
388.9
cd/m²
395.1
cd/m²
411.9
cd/m²
391
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
NE140FHM-N61 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 422.9 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 396.6 cd/m² Minimum: 5.11 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 422.9 cd/m²
Contrast: 1322:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.9
ΔE Greyscale 6.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
67.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE
NE140FHM-N61, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14"
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE
B140HAN05.7, LTPS AHVA-IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14"
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00
N140HCG-GQ2, IPS , 1920x1080, 14"
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XXS00100
B140UAN02.1, IPS, 1920x1200, 14"
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
AU Optronics AUO068B, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"
Dell Latitude 7410
AU Optronics B140ZAN, IPS, 3840x2160, 14"
Display
2%
3%
12%
4%
7%
Display P3 Coverage
68.1
66.6
-2%
66.8
-2%
76.1
12%
68.2
0%
71.8
5%
sRGB Coverage
91.7
96.8
6%
97.9
7%
99.9
9%
98.5
7%
99.3
8%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
67.1
67.6
1%
69
3%
77.7
16%
69.8
4%
72.4
8%
Response Times
13%
41%
3%
-6%
38%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
68 ?(33, 35)
63.2 ?(31.6, 31.6)
7%
32.4 ?(16.4, 16)
52%
62.4 ?(28, 34.4)
8%
65.2 ?(30.8, 34.4)
4%
39.2 ?(20.4, 18.8)
42%
Response Time Black / White *
34 ?(17, 17)
28 ?(12.4, 15.6)
18%
15.2 ?(6.8, 8.4)
55%
34.8 ?(16.4, 18.4)
-2%
39.6 ?(20, 19.6)
-16%
22.4 ?(12.4, 10)
34%
PWM Frequency
22730 ?(50)
26040 ?(50)
15%
Screen
26%
26%
13%
21%
-1%
Brightness middle
422.9
404
-4%
404
-4%
396
-6%
432.5
2%
388.6
-8%
Brightness
397
397
0%
371
-7%
397
0%
405
2%
365
-8%
Brightness Distribution
91
92
1%
88
-3%
90
-1%
86
-5%
82
-10%
Black Level *
0.32
0.21
34%
0.34
-6%
0.23
28%
0.3
6%
0.35
-9%
Contrast
1322
1924
46%
1188
-10%
1722
30%
1442
9%
1110
-16%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.8
3.1
35%
1.4
71%
3.7
23%
2.34
51%
4.04
16%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.7
4.7
46%
3.2
63%
7.6
13%
3.59
59%
9.2
-6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.9
1.3
32%
0.8
58%
1.7
11%
1.83
4%
1.25
34%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.1
3.4
44%
1.6
74%
5.2
15%
2.5
59%
6.4
-5%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.38 92%
2.13 103%
2.11 104%
2.1 105%
2.3 96%
CCT
7635 85%
7070 92%
6480 100%
6252 104%
6582 99%
6957 93%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
61.8
63
70.4
63.8
66.4
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
96.6
97.9
99.9
99.4
99.4
Total Average (Program / Settings)
14% / 19%
23% / 24%
9% / 11%
6% / 13%
15% / 6%

* ... smaller is better

颜色
颜色
饱和度
饱和度
灰度
灰度
颜色(已校准
颜色(已校准
饱和度(已校准
饱和度(已校准
灰度(已校准)
灰度(已校准)

在交付状态下,我们用CalMAN和X-Rite i1 Pro 2测量的色彩还原性很弱。图像显得太冷了。使用X-Rite i1Profiler校准后,这种情况明显改善。然而,如果我们使用这个色彩配置文件,图像中心的亮度就会下降到360cd/m²左右,所以你可以在准确的色彩或最大亮度之间做出选择。1322:1的对比度值是好的,但并不出色。稍微低一点的黑值将有利于液晶面板。

我们对ThinkPad T14s G2的色彩空间覆盖率感到有些失望。在92%的小色彩空间覆盖率下,有些颜色根本没有。

sRGB: 91.7%
sRGB: 91.7%
AdobeRGB: 67.1%
AdobeRGB: 67.1%
DCI-P3: 68.1%
DCI-P3: 68.1%
室外(半阴凉处
室外(半阴凉处

使用联想ThinkPad T14s 2021笔记本电脑效果相当好。凭借哑光表面和近400cd/m²的亮度,即使在较亮的光线条件下,你也能轻松完成一些工作,不过如果可能的话,你还是应该避免阳光直射。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
68 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 33 ms rise
↘ 35 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 22730 Hz ≤ 50 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 22730 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 50 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 22730 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

作为典型的IPS面板,视角的稳定性是无可指责的。

性能:Tiger Lake UP3在ThinkPad T14s 2021年的表现

英特尔Tiger Lake ,取代了Comet Lake,Tiger Lake UP3 CPU的选择也相应地变成了。 英特尔酷睿i5-1135G7, i7-1165G7, i5-1145G7, 和 i7-1185G7.后两种处理器是英特尔专门为联想ThinkPad T14s第二代等企业设备设计的vPro芯片。在图形芯片方面,你没有太多选择,因为只有集成的英特尔选项。i5 CPU包含稍弱的Xe GPU版本,有80个而不是96个执行单元。

不幸的是,联想继续使用焊接的工作存储器。上一次可以更新是在2018年的ThinkPad T480s型号。然而,至少这有一个好处,即联想执行升级到32GB LPDDR4X-4266内存,这在内存模块上是不可能的。M.2-2280固态硬盘没有焊接,也支持4.0 PCIe标准,这在T14s第二代中是第一次。

HWiNFO
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z缓存
CPU-Z缓存
CPU-Z 主板
CPU-Z 主板
CPU-Z内存
CPU-Z内存

处理器

英特尔酷睿i7-1165G7是一个Tiger Lake UP3处理器,这意味着其四个物理核心(8个线程)的时钟速度在2.8和4.7 GHz之间,最大功耗为12至28瓦。你可以将该处理器与我们的其他CPU进行比较 CPU列表.

为了提高性能,联想允许更高的功率消耗。在30分钟内可以使用55瓦,之后40瓦就是极限了。然而,在Cinebench循环中,该处理器无法持续保持这一性能水平因此,虽然ThinkPad T14s G2代表了与ThinkPad T14s G1相比的性能升级 ThinkPad T14s G1 IntelT14s G1 AMD在多核性能方面仍然是性能之王。但至少在单核性能方面,英特尔型号能够抢占头把交椅。

在电池运行情况下,CPU性能原来低了约16%,而在3DMark 11物理测试中,T14s G2没有达到12278分,而只达到10527分。

512.6587.6662.6737.6812.6887.6962.61037.61112.61187.61262.61337.61412.6Tooltip
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø811 (721.84-1004.57)
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE Intel Core i5-10210U: Ø564 (557.76-618.79)
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U: Ø1311 (1300.6-1345.67)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø834 (823.11-884.45)
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U: Ø1401 (1338.87-1412.98)
Dell Latitude 7410 Intel Core i7-10610U: Ø543 (512.63-548.19)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R23: Single Core | Multi Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Office
  (229 - 766, n=92, last 2 years)
603 Points +15%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW
Intel Core i7-1165G7
566 Points +8%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (442 - 589, n=81)
552 Points +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE
Intel Core i7-1165G7
525 Points
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
479 Points -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
468 Points -11%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE
Intel Core i5-10210U
414 Points -21%
Dell Latitude 7410
Intel Core i7-10610U
349 Points -34%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Office
  (590 - 5980, n=92, last 2 years)
3613 Points +96%
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
3264 Points +77%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
3050 Points +65%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW
Intel Core i7-1165G7
2033 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (1060 - 2657, n=81)
1967 Points +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1846 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE
Intel Core i5-10210U
1323 Points -28%
Dell Latitude 7410
Intel Core i7-10610U
1271 Points -31%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Average of class Office
  (618 - 1995, n=93, last 2 years)
1556 Points +19%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1478 Points +13%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (1110 - 1539, n=59)
1425 Points +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1306 Points
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Office
  (1577 - 15743, n=93, last 2 years)
9321 Points +93%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5671 Points +18%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (2525 - 6862, n=64)
5110 Points +6%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE
Intel Core i7-1165G7
4823 Points
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Office
  (98 - 284, n=94, last 2 years)
230 Points +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE
Intel Core i7-1165G7
224 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW
Intel Core i7-1165G7
217 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (115 - 230, n=78)
212 Points -5%
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
182 Points -19%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
181 Points -19%
Dell Latitude 7410
Intel Core i7-10610U
177 Points -21%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE
Intel Core i5-10210U
163 Points -27%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Office
  (246 - 2642, n=95, last 2 years)
1561 Points +55%
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
1413 (1338.87min - 1412.98max) Points +41%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
1346 (1300.6min - 1345.67max) Points +34%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1005 (721.84min - 1004.57max) Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW
Intel Core i7-1165G7
884 (823.11min - 884.45max) Points -12%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (553 - 1027, n=86)
846 Points -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE
Intel Core i5-10210U
619 (557.76min - 618.79max) Points -38%
Dell Latitude 7410
Intel Core i7-10610U
548 (512.63min - 548.19max) Points -45%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Dell Latitude 7410
Intel Core i7-10610U
812 Seconds * -41%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE
Intel Core i5-10210U
797 Seconds * -38%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (468 - 1138, n=80)
618 Seconds * -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW
Intel Core i7-1165G7
601 Seconds * -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE
Intel Core i7-1165G7
577 Seconds *
Average of class Office
  (208 - 1956, n=94, last 2 years)
425 Seconds * +26%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
367 Seconds * +36%
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
340 Seconds * +41%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Office
  (2972 - 6687, n=94, last 2 years)
5245 MIPS +1%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (4478 - 5507, n=80)
5182 MIPS 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5173 MIPS
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5069 MIPS -2%
Dell Latitude 7410
Intel Core i7-10610U
4625 MIPS -11%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
4467 MIPS -14%
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
4413 MIPS -15%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE
Intel Core i5-10210U
4211 MIPS -19%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
42173 MIPS +68%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
39649 MIPS +58%
Average of class Office
  (7532 - 65460, n=95, last 2 years)
38720 MIPS +54%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE
Intel Core i7-1165G7
25087 MIPS
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW
Intel Core i7-1165G7
23657 MIPS -6%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (15347 - 27405, n=80)
22935 MIPS -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE
Intel Core i5-10210U
17548 MIPS -30%
Dell Latitude 7410
Intel Core i7-10610U
17095 MIPS -32%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average of class Office
  (510 - 1995, n=95, last 2 years)
1582 Points +10%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1529 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (1302 - 1595, n=77)
1524 Points +6%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1441 Points
Dell Latitude 7410
Intel Core i7-10610U
1237 Points -14%
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
1154 Points -20%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
1149 Points -20%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE
Intel Core i5-10210U
1072 Points -26%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Office
  (1018 - 11980, n=94, last 2 years)
7537 Points +38%
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
6609 Points +21%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
6444 Points +18%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5773 Points +6%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5460 Points
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (3078 - 5926, n=77)
5155 Points -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE
Intel Core i5-10210U
3899 Points -29%
Dell Latitude 7410
Intel Core i7-10610U
3731 Points -32%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Office
  (1.72 - 18.7, n=92, last 2 years)
10.5 fps +47%
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
10.3 fps +44%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
9.55 fps +34%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE
Intel Core i7-1165G7
7.13 fps
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (1.39 - 8.47, n=80)
6.3 fps -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW
Intel Core i7-1165G7
6.15 fps -14%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE
Intel Core i5-10210U
4.61 fps -35%
Dell Latitude 7410
Intel Core i7-10610U
4.55 fps -36%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
73.4 s * -69%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
60 s * -38%
Dell Latitude 7410
Intel Core i7-10610U
57 s * -31%
Average of class Office
  (31.3 - 129.6, n=92, last 2 years)
53.6 s * -24%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE
Intel Core i5-10210U
53.2 s * -23%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (21.5 - 88.1, n=78)
49.2 s * -13%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW
Intel Core i7-1165G7
43.8 s * -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE
Intel Core i7-1165G7
43.4 s *
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE
Intel Core i5-10210U
0.729 sec * -24%
Dell Latitude 7410
Intel Core i7-10610U
0.657 sec * -11%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
0.616 sec * -4%
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
0.61 sec * -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW
Intel Core i7-1165G7
0.599 sec * -2%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7
  (0.552 - 1.002, n=80)
0.594 sec * -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE
Intel Core i7-1165G7
0.59 sec *
Average of class Office
  (0.4244 - 1.135, n=91, last 2 years)
0.549 sec * +7%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1005 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
105 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
224 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
1846 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
525 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1306 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
4823 Points
Help

系统性能

在PCMark 10中,联想T14s第二代笔记本电脑取得了我们比较领域中的最高总分。这也与日常操作中非常好的性能相对应。

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Office
  (2463 - 7344, n=86, last 2 years)
5627 Points +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
5214 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5038 Points -3%
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
Vega 7, R7 PRO 4750U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
4983 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (4531 - 5454, n=50)
4959 Points -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00
Vega 7, R7 PRO 4750U, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
4890 Points -6%
Dell Latitude 7410
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10610U, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
4348 Points -17%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE
UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
3929 Points -25%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
10244 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10127 Points -1%
Average of class Office
  (5575 - 20841, n=86, last 2 years)
10099 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (8997 - 11505, n=50)
10014 Points -2%
Dell Latitude 7410
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10610U, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
9376 Points -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00
Vega 7, R7 PRO 4750U, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
9034 Points -12%
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
Vega 7, R7 PRO 4750U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
8529 Points -17%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE
UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
8267 Points -19%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average of class Office
  (3041 - 10415, n=86, last 2 years)
7746 Points +12%
Dell Latitude 7410
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10610U, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
7540 Points +9%
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
Vega 7, R7 PRO 4750U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
7364 Points +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
6900 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00
Vega 7, R7 PRO 4750U, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
6877 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6856 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (5570 - 7136, n=50)
6711 Points -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE
UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
6408 Points -7%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Office
  (2049 - 9773, n=86, last 2 years)
6351 Points +17%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
5445 Points
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
Vega 7, R7 PRO 4750U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
5347 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00
Vega 7, R7 PRO 4750U, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
5109 Points -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4998 Points -8%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (4083 - 5550, n=50)
4937 Points -9%
Dell Latitude 7410
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10610U, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
3156 Points -42%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE
UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
3108 Points -43%
PCMark 10 Score
5214 points
Help

DPC延迟

不幸的是,联想ThinkPad T14s第2代正在为高 DPC延迟而奋斗 。这意味着在使用音频应用程序时可能会出现一些掉线现象。

延迟监测
延迟监测
LatencyMon 驱动程序
LatencyMon 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
3164 μs *

* ... smaller is better

存储解决方案

三星PM981a是一款M.2-2280格式的PCIe 3.0固态硬盘,在这种情况下,其容量为1 Terrabyte。与前代产品的256GB型号相比,ThinkPad T14s G2的固态硬盘要快得多。只有在与ThinkPad X1 Carbon 9代的PCie 4.0固态硬盘相比时,才会出现这种情况。ThinkPad X1 Carbon第九代相比,它显然仍然落后。

Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
Dell Latitude 7410
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
Average Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-22%
-14%
33%
-9%
-15%
-7%
Write 4K
149.7
117.5
-22%
108
-28%
171.3
14%
111.4
-26%
133.4
-11%
139.7 ?(76.2 - 229, n=36)
-7%
Read 4K
64.5
40.81
-37%
39.82
-38%
80.5
25%
58.2
-10%
51.3
-20%
49.9 ?(34.3 - 75.5, n=36)
-23%
Write Seq
1933
2031
5%
2028
5%
2700
40%
2195
14%
1897
-2%
Read Seq
2512
1970
-22%
1826
-27%
3233
29%
2516
0%
2202
-12%
2014 ?(973 - 2639, n=35)
-20%
Write 4K Q32T1
514
395.5
-23%
570
11%
513
0%
472.1
-8%
384.9
-25%
461 ?(268 - 656, n=36)
-10%
Read 4K Q32T1
475.9
361.4
-24%
401.5
-16%
478.4
1%
380.5
-20%
318.7
-33%
Write Seq Q32T1
2968
2330
-21%
3091
4%
4524
52%
2339
-21%
2866
-3%
Read Seq Q32T1
3542
2530
-29%
2872
-19%
7098
100%
3565
1%
3122
-12%
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3542 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2968 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 475.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 514 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2512 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1933 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 64.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 149.7 MB/s

Constant Performance Reads: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

图形卡

英特尔Iris Xe G7图形具有96个EUs,与旧的英特尔Iris Xe G7图形处理器相比,是一个重大的升级。 英特尔UHD Graphics 620.在联想ThinkPad T14s第二代产品中,还增加了另一个因素:与 T14s G1,联想已经将工作内存从DDR4-3200升级到LPDDR4X-4266。这里使用四通道配置的更快的存储允许更好的性能。总的来说,相比之下,性能有了巨大的飞跃。 英特尔UHD Graphics 620的前辈相比,有了巨大的性能提升。

在电池运行时,可以使用全部的GPU性能。

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Office
  (1468 - 13132, n=89, last 2 years)
6812 Points +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
6663 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
6591 Points -1%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (2867 - 7676, n=202)
6353 Points -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
5399 Points -19%
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
5331 Points -20%
Dell Latitude 7410
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-10610U
1951 Points -71%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-10210U
1844 Points -72%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
5116 Points
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (2286 - 6482, n=215)
4920 Points -4%
Average of class Office
  (736 - 9375, n=91, last 2 years)
4858 Points -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
4830 Points -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
3593 Points -30%
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
3521 Points -31%
Dell Latitude 7410
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-10610U
1338 Points -74%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-10210U
1227 Points -76%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Office
  (313 - 4109, n=90, last 2 years)
1603 Points +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
1557 Points
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (707 - 1871, n=212)
1495 Points -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
1493 Points -4%
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
1063 Points -32%
Dell Latitude 7410
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-10610U
413 Points -73%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-10210U
402 Points -74%
3DMark 11 Performance
7074 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
4653 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
1717 points
Help

游戏性能

联想设法从ThinkPad笔记本电脑中获得了相对不错的游戏性能。然而,就绝对性能而言,英特尔Xe GPU仍然不能将联想ThinkPad T14s第二代变成一台游戏笔记本电脑,在现代游戏中的细节水平不得不降低。

The Witcher 3 - 1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
59.2 (50min - 66max) fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (21.4 - 77.8, n=184)
53.6 fps -9%
Average of class Office
  (12 - 106.3, n=64, last 2 years)
48.9 fps -17%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
47.3 (3min - 66max) fps -20%
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
43.4 (41min - 48max) fps -27%
1112131415Tooltip
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR: Ø14 (11-15)
lowmed.highultra
GTA V (2015) 99 74.3 25.8 10.7
The Witcher 3 (2015) 93.9 59.2 30.9 15.1
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 85.1 87 53 46.6
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 46 24.1
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 29.2 36.2 33.4
Strange Brigade (2018) 86 37.1 30 24.2
F1 2020 (2020) 79.7 38.9 32.4 21.4

排放。风扇的声音比ThinkPad T14s G1略大。

噪声排放

无论你在Windows中选择哪种性能模式,如果没有负载,风扇就会保持沉默。在我们的负载测试中(3DMark 06、Prime95和FurMark的压力测试),运行中的风扇产生约35 dB(A),这很明显,但不令人讨厌。然而,与 ThinkPad T14s Gen 1 Intel相比,风扇的声音显然更大。

幸运的是,联想ThinkPad T14s第二代没有线圈啸叫。

Noise Level

Idle
24.81 / 24.81 / 24.81 dB(A)
Load
35.14 / 35.14 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24.81 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2029.319.920.724.82528.119.919.226.33121.517.817.720.8402420.719.626.55019.917.81720.16319.917.817.220.48022.315.916.319.310018.521.716.917.712517.315.116.118.816024.119.618.720.820019.418.111.618.825020.917.416.421.231522.91815.223.640023.917.514.724.650022.513.611.622.463024.514.312.224.780027.713.910.627.4100025.415.61125.4125022.714.31022.6160024.312.410.423.8200023.911.511.123.9250023.511.711.523.8315023.311.511.523.3400023.312.112.223.1500023.612.812.823.2630023.513.213.623.1800017.412.412.616.81000015.412.412.414.11250013.912.513.1131600012.516.415.311.8SPL35.725.524.235.5N2.30.70.62.3median 23.3median 13.9median 12.4median 23.1Delta2.92.61.92.83130.733.829.729.526.930.529.829.527.73129.626.930.929.124.324.224.624.124.923.12327.724.223.523.623.122.822.622.922.822.922.722.823.12321.320.621.620.719.819.820.119.419.819.518.419.119.318.219.219.31818.918.817.418.718.416.718.218.216.517.916.816.217.316.31616.916.21616.316.215.916.316.31616.216.116161615.816.115.915.815.915.615.515.73029.3301.41.21.3median 18.8median 17.4median 18.72.82.12.7hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseLenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGELenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE

温度

压力测试(Prime95 + FurMark)
压力测试(Prime95 + FurMark)

在压力测试中,联想ThinkPad T14s G2的最高温度是在笔记本中央和右边缘。我们在按键之间键盘框架中测得的最高温度为47.5°C(117.5°F)。 总的来说,ThinkPad的温度没有理由让人担心。

经过一小时的压力测试,T14s 2021的处理器仍然能够消耗大约22瓦的能量。CPU温度为67℃(153°F),处理器时钟速度为1.3GHz。压力测试期间的TDP节流对我们在压力测试后运行的3DMark 11没有影响,所以你在日常操作中应该不会遇到任何节流。

Max. Load
 36.4 °C41.3 °C38.1 °C 
 33.2 °C47.5 °C40.2 °C 
 29.1 °C27.9 °C30.5 °C 
Maximum: 47.5 °C
Average: 36 °C
37.7 °C43.4 °C37.7 °C
38.3 °C39 °C34.4 °C
32.9 °C31.8 °C31.1 °C
Maximum: 43.4 °C
Average: 36.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42.3 °C | Room Temperature 23.5 °C | Fluke 62 Max+
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.5 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.4 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.5 °C / 86.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-2.9 °C / -5.2 F).
闲置(顶部
闲置(顶部
闲置(底部)
闲置(底部)
压力测试(顶部
压力测试(顶部
压力测试(底部
压力测试(底部

发言人

ThinkPad T14s G2:键盘上方的扬声器
ThinkPad T14s G2:键盘上方的扬声器

ThinkPad T14s G2的变化之一是扬声器现在朝向顶部。与联想T14s第一代笔记本电脑相比,新的设计确实在高频范围内声音略大且更均衡,但低音的效果却微乎其微。总的来说,这代表了一种改进,因为现在无论笔记本下面的表面如何,声音都是一样的。

作为内部扬声器的替代方案,你也可以使用外部解决方案,用于此的耳机连接工作得非常完美。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2020.424.12520.322.73120.222.44022.125.15020.119.46316.314.9801415.310023.624.312520.12716023.131.420021.245.825020.553.631516.858.440015.565.550013.369.363013.171.880011.569.410001362.1125011.463.516009.963.5200010.260.7250010.760.931501165.7400011.163.5500011.462.3630011.458.7800011.458.91000011.352.21250011.1521600010.744.8SPL24.376.5N0.638.8median 11.4median 60.7Delta2.97.530.728.329.53029.830.93130.630.93224.232.124.93227.730.723.633.622.639.322.944.623.149.520.652.719.856.119.45818.459.418.266.11866.317.464.416.764.516.564.516.262.11659.21655.715.951.61654.11647.115.844.215.839.315.533.729.373.71.229.8median 17.4median 54.12.110.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGELenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理。T14s G2的电池寿命比前代产品短。

消耗功率

相较于 联想ThinkPad T14s 2020,T14s 2021在怠速运行时的功耗更低。然而,在负载情况下,这种情况正好相反,老款机型的效率更高。

最大功耗为67.3瓦,高于65瓦的电源额定功率。然而,由于这个消耗高峰只是短暂地维持,所以并没有带来任何问题。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.23 / 0.46 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 2.2 / 5.5 / 6.1 Watt
Load midlight 41.3 / 67.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14"
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE
i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ, LTPS AHVA-IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14"
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00
R7 PRO 4750U, Vega 7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00, IPS , 1920x1080, 14"
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS LED, 3840x2400, 14"
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
R7 PRO 4750U, Vega 7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"
Dell Latitude 7410
i7-10610U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, IPS, 3840x2160, 14"
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
 
Average of class Office
 
Power Consumption
0%
-51%
-63%
4%
-21%
-57%
-36%
Idle Minimum *
2.2
2.6
-18%
5.7
-159%
5
-127%
2.6
-18%
3.7
-68%
5.34 ?(2.2 - 46.5, n=193)
-143%
Idle Average *
5.5
5.5
-0%
8.9
-62%
10.2
-85%
5
9%
6.2
-13%
8.55 ?(3.8 - 63, n=193)
-55%
Idle Maximum *
6.1
7.5
-23%
11
-80%
11
-80%
5.6
8%
7
-15%
10.8 ?(5.8 - 68.9, n=193)
-77%
Load Average *
41.3
28.2
32%
38.2
8%
51.7
-25%
39.8
4%
43.2
-5%
Witcher 3 ultra *
34.5
37.1
-8%
Load Maximum *
67.3
59.6
11%
40.2
40%
67.5
-0%
49.9
26%
68.6
-2%

* ... smaller is better

32.537.542.547.5Tooltip

电池寿命

充电时间:162分钟
充电时间:162分钟

ThinkPad T14s第二代的内置内部电池提供57Wh的容量。有了它,ThinkPad笔记本电脑在Wi-Fi测试中实现了9小时的电池寿命,这并不坏,但仍比直接使用英特尔的前代产品差。在这方面,ThinkPad T14s G2更对应于T14s G1 AMD

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 91)
9h 40min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 91)
7h 38min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14h 34min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 25min
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 57 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE
i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00
R7 PRO 4750U, Vega 7, 57 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XXS00100
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 57 Wh
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U
R7 PRO 4750U, Vega 7, 53 Wh
Dell Latitude 7410
i7-10610U, UHD Graphics 620, 68 Wh
Average of class Office
 
Battery Runtime
19%
15%
21%
37%
58%
8%
H.264
874
880
1%
792
-9%
WiFi v1.3
580
789
36%
612
6%
700
21%
795
37%
661
14%
Load
85
102
20%
127
49%
172
102%

Pros

+ 优秀的输入设备
+ 广泛的设备选择(Wi-Fi 6e、5G可选)。
+ 坚固的外壳,改进的表面层
+ 高达32GB的LPDDR4X存储空间
+ 明亮的亚光显示屏

Cons

- 16:9格式,大屏幕边框
- RAM被焊接在一起
- 不完整的sRGB覆盖
- DPC延时问题

结论:ThinkPad T14s G2总体上非常好,但它本可以做得更好

测试联想ThinkPad T14s G2,测试装置由Campuspoint提供
测试联想ThinkPad T14s G2,测试装置由Campuspoint提供

联想ThinkPad T14s Gen 2是一个困难的案例。虽然联想进行了全面的重新设计,也引入了一些好的变化,但制造商放弃了对16:10格式的改变,原因不明。这使ThinkPad T14s在联想ThinkPad阵容中处于一个奇怪的位置,因为它是使用 "旧的 "16:9格式的最昂贵的型号之一,无疑导致其吸引力与X1 Carbon 9代相比受到影响。 X1 Carbon第九代以及更小的ThinkPad X13第二代。

然而,T14s G2的伟大键盘无疑是一个奖励。虽然它提供了比前代产品更短的行程,但它仍然覆盖了整个标准宽度,与ThinkPad X系列的键盘形成鲜明对比。ThinkPad T14s第二代的外壳现在不容易显出污垢,给人留下了良好的印象,其广泛的设备选择也是如此。Wi-Fi 6e和4G LTE并不是终点,联想还提供了可选功能,如新的1080p网络摄像头和5G。另一方面,低功耗显示屏有点令人失望,因为这个面板的色彩再现缺乏几个百分点,不能完全覆盖sRGB色彩空间。但至少它是明亮和哑光的。我们发现不幸的是,所有的内存仍然是焊接的,尽管至少现在是LPDDR4X存储。

一个非常好的等级,但仍有改进的余地。由于采用了16:9的显示屏,联想ThinkPad T14s第二代并不像它本来那样有吸引力。

联想ThinkPad T14s第二代的购买者将得到一台非常好的商务笔记本电脑,可以在公司周围使用,正如ThinkPad T14s第一代的情况那样。 ThinkPad T14s第1代.16:9的格式使其无法获得更高的分数,尽管在性能上有所提高,但英特尔版本仍然只有半吸引力。虽然ThinkPad T14s G2的AMD Ryzen 5000型号已经公布,但它还没有上市。我们预计该机型将继续成为更好的选择,当然,一旦它上市,我们将对其进行测试。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

在德国,经过测试的20WM003TGE型号价格约为2079欧元(约2475美元)。在美国,联想ThinkPad T14s第二代可从联想直接购买,起价2379美元.

Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE - 06/27/2021 v7 (old)
Benjamin Herzig

Chassis
88 / 98 → 89%
Keyboard
94%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
72 / 80 → 89%
Weight
71 / 20-75 → 93%
Battery
89%
Display
87%
Games Performance
70 / 78 → 90%
Application Performance
88 / 95 → 93%
Temperature
90%
Noise
96%
Audio
64%
Camera
21 / 85 → 24%
Average
79%
89%
Office - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 联想ThinkPad T14s G2 Intel评测。尽管是16:9的格式,但却是一台非常好的商务笔记本电脑
Benjamin Herzig, 2021-08-14 (Update: 2021-08-14)