联想ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7笔记本电脑。高端商务敞篷车评测
在联想给ThinkPad X1 Yoga G6去年,联想对ThinkPad X1 Yoga G6进行了广泛的升级,采用了新的外壳和16:10显示屏,新一代G7的主要重点是改用英特尔新的Alder Lake P处理器。这些处理器采用了新的混合架构,并承诺具有显著的性能优势,特别是在多核领域。同时,根据制造商的说法,有一个改进的冷却系统,通过键盘提供新鲜空气。
我们收到了联想首批新机型中的一款,型号为21CE002HGE。这款产品使用了新的 酷睿i7-1270P完全支持vPro,16GB LPDDR5内存,512GB PCIe 4.0固态硬盘,以及分辨率为1920x1200的哑光全高清触摸屏。目前,我们无法提供关于价格的任何确切信息,而且本评论中的确切配置是否会进入市场仍不确定。但类似的配置与稍慢的 酷睿i7-1260P现在可以在联想的网上商店以不同的价格买到,这取决于购买的国家(见评论末尾的 "价格和可用性")。以欧元计算,配备较慢的酷睿i7-1260P的ThinkPad X1 Yoga G6的官方价格略低于3,100欧元,使其比前者贵700欧元。 前代产品.如果考虑到酷睿i7-1270P的附加费用,即ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10的250欧元,我们的评测设备应该在3300欧元左右。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
89.4 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE i7-1270P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.5 kg | 15.53 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
87.3 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2021 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 11.5 mm | 13.50" | 2256x1504 | |
90.6 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 15.25 mm | 14.00" | 3840x2400 | |
89.4 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2022 | Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 18.9 mm | 14.00" | 1900x1200 | |
90.8 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2021 | HP Elite Dragonfly Max i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 16 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
89 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.5 kg | 13.94 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳。风暴灰的铝制ThinkPad
联想对去年一代G6机型的外壳设计进行了彻底的改革。 去年的一代G6机型,这就是为什么今年没有变化。在外观上,X1 Yoga G7继续以其颜色方案从传统的黑色ThinkPads中脱颖而出。当然,通常的标识显示了公司的隶属关系,风暴灰色的表面在防污和防指纹方面也有明显优势。黑色的ThinkPads往往会很快变得 "油腻",这在这里就不是一个问题了。
铝制结构的稳定性一如既往,非常好。底座单元只在中间区域有一点弯曲,但这需要很大的力量,因此对正常打字来说应该没有问题。显示屏的盖子非常稳定,即使从后面有选择地施加压力,我们也无法引起任何图像错误。令我们惊讶的是,唯一的小缺陷是两个铰链,它的运行有点过于平稳。虽然屏幕可以用一只手轻松打开,但当我们抬起或移动底座时,打开的角度发生了几次巨大的变化。
与最近评测的Yoga 9i 14 ,对于现代设备来说,屏幕边缘相对较宽,这就是为什么屏幕与身体的比率 "只有 "81%。然而,考虑到高稳定性,我们仍然认为这是可以接受的,X1 Yoga G7看起来一点都不老气。紧凑的手写笔仍然可以直接收在箱子里,在那里也可以充电。
ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7的重量略低于1.5公斤,是我们对比组中最重的设备之一,使用一段时间后,重量肯定是明显的,尤其是作为平板电脑使用时。在尺寸方面,与竞争对手没有太大区别。只有HP DragonFly Max明显更紧凑,但它也有一个更小的13.3英寸屏幕。
硬件方面。ThinkPad提供了除读卡器之外的一切
与上一代相比,在广泛的连接性方面没有任何变化。前代产品.除了两个现代的Thunderbolt连接外,还有传统的USB-A输入,所以在大多数情况下你可以不使用适配器。然而,仍然没有读卡器。
沟通
在我们的评测模型中,联想已经安装了一个来自英特尔的当前Wi-Fi 6E模块。AX211E能够毫无问题地连接到我们来自华硕的6GHz路由器(GT-AXE11000),但我们最初有一些性能问题。英特尔直接提供的驱动程序更新在此有所帮助,之后在我们的标准化WLAN测试中,传输率也非常高。只有传输功率在大约20秒后略有下降。总的来说,性能仍然非常好。
我们的测试设备在出厂时配备了Fibocom的WWAN模块(L860-GL),支持4G/LTE。除了eSIM的选择,我们的模型还在右侧提供了一个nano-SIM的插槽。请注意。如果你没有从工厂订购WWAN模块,必要的天线不会安装在机箱内,也没有nano-SIM卡插槽。除了LTE模块,联想还提供一个可选的5G调制解调器。
网络摄像头
比去年的一个改进 X1瑜伽G6 是相机,它现在使用了一个带有机械快门的1080p模块。在良好的照明条件下,其质量是可以接受的,但与智能手机中的优质前置摄像头相比,仍有很大差距。另一方面,额外的安全功能也很有趣。首先,红外摄像头可以通过Windows Hello进行人脸识别。在预装的Vantage软件中(ThinkPads上的红色商业版本),有联想的Zero Touch功能,它提供了一些安全和管理功能。例如,当你不再坐在显示器前时,笔记本可以自动锁定。这可能是非常实用的,特别是当你在移动时。
维护
底部的机箱盖用5颗标准的十字螺丝固定,可以非常容易地拆卸。然而,和以前的型号一样,人们在里面可以做的事情不多。除了两个可以清洁的小风扇外,你只能接触到WWAN模块和M.2 2280固态硬盘,它位于一个额外的(拧紧的)金属盖下。
输入设备。联想坚持使用1.5毫米行程
键盘
虽然联想已经在一些型号中使用了键程减少到1.35毫米的键盘,如ThinkPad X1 Titanium YogaX1 Yoga G7的按键行程通常为1.5毫米。然而,在上一代产品中,按键的高度已经降低。 前代产品这无疑影响了主观的打字感觉。键盘总体上还是非常好的,与联想的消费者机型相比也有优势,比如最近评测的瑜伽9i 14.但是,如果你是来自旧的ThinkPad型号,特别是,你会立即注意到键盘的质量已经下降,与惠普或戴尔的其他商务笔记本相比,它不再具有任何真正的优势。
。
两段式白色键盘背光在较暗的环境下有帮助,但没有通过传感器自动激活。电源按钮位于键盘上方的右侧,还包括指纹扫描仪,工作可靠。
触摸板和手写笔
ClickPad仍然可以完美地工作,当你在底部区域按下它时,也会产生非常低沉的、但高质量的声音。TrackPoint专用按钮的质量有所下降,因为它们有点松动,而且点击的声音更大。另一方面,鼠标控制在ClickPad和TrackPoint上都运作得非常好。
当然,电容式触摸屏也可用于输入,我们在这里没有遇到任何问题。我们甚至比Yoga 9i 14的OLED屏幕更喜欢哑光表面(尤其是打字时),因为哑光表面产生的阻力更小。紧凑的手写笔在箱子里总是触手可及,但它也非常小和薄。它当然足以应付偶尔的笔记,但如果你想大量书写,你最好使用较大的手写笔,如联想的Precision Pen 2。
显示屏。哑光触摸屏的X1瑜伽
我们的X1 Yoga G7评测设备配备了哑光1200p触摸屏(1920x1200),我们也从前代产品中了解到这一点。然而,这里使用的是来自不同供应商的面板。然而,这里使用的是不同供应商的面板:和过去一样,面板的问题似乎是一个彩票游戏。例如,我们来自CSOT的面板未能达到宣传的400 cd/m²的亮度,平均达到360 cd/m²多一点,但黑色水平和对比度比去年使用LG面板的X1 Yoga G6略好。
哑光面板的主观图像质量从根本上说是可以接受的,但明亮的区域看起来略有颗粒感(你也可以在子像素图像中看到这一点),总的来说,内容和颜色一般不会像4K面板或良好的OLED屏幕那样显得锐利或鲜艳。另一方面,IPS面板提供了一个非常明显的优势,没有PWM闪烁的现象。响应时间也不明显,没有光晕的大问题。
|
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 372 cd/m²
Contrast: 1767:1 (Black: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.8
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
71.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.15
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE MNE007JA1-1, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE LPM135M467, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P LEN140WQUXGA, OLED, 3840x2400, 14" | Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA BOE CQ NE140WUM-N65, IPS, 1900x1200, 14" | HP Elite Dragonfly Max InfoVision X133NVFL R0, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 AU Optronics B140QAN, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G6-20Y0S00200 LP140WU1-SPB1, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 27% | -2% | 9% | -0% | |||
Display P3 Coverage | 69.3 | 98.7 42% | 68 -2% | 80.7 16% | 69.8 1% | ||
sRGB Coverage | 99.7 | 99.8 0% | 98.9 -1% | 100 0% | 97.1 -3% | ||
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 71.3 | 98.5 38% | 69.3 -3% | 79.7 12% | 72.2 1% | ||
Response Times | -18% | 90% | -22% | -25% | -38% | -8% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 42 ? | 53.6 ? -28% | 2.8 ? 93% | 50 ? -19% | 44.8 ? -7% | 54 ? -29% | 49.2 ? -17% |
Response Time Black / White * | 22.4 ? | 24 ? -7% | 2.8 ? 87% | 28 ? -25% | 32 ? -43% | 32.8 ? -46% | 22 ? 2% |
PWM Frequency | 239.2 ? | ||||||
Screen | -13% | 2526% | -39% | -10% | -61% | -38% | |
Brightness middle | 371 | 466 26% | 361 -3% | 548 48% | 777.5 110% | 483.6 30% | 417 12% |
Brightness | 363 | 454 25% | 362 0% | 515 42% | 727 100% | 465 28% | 404 11% |
Brightness Distribution | 92 | 94 2% | 98 7% | 87 -5% | 75 -18% | 92 0% | 93 1% |
Black Level * | 0.21 | 0.23 -10% | 0.001 100% | 0.17 19% | 0.44 -110% | 0.32 -52% | 0.22 -5% |
Contrast | 1767 | 2026 15% | 361000 20330% | 3224 82% | 1767 0% | 1511 -14% | 1895 7% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 2.1 -62% | 2.8 -115% | 3.67 -182% | 1.62 -25% | 3.69 -184% | 2.8 -115% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.6 | 4.5 -73% | 5.8 -123% | 7.15 -175% | 5.26 -102% | 5.97 -130% | 4.7 -81% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.8 | 1.32 -65% | 2.05 -156% | 1.6 -100% | |||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.1 | 2.7 -29% | 1.9 10% | 5.13 -144% | 1.6 24% | 3.5 -67% | 3.7 -76% |
Gamma | 2.15 102% | 2.08 106% | 2.16 102% | 2.46 89% | 2.2 100% | 2.04 108% | 2.08 106% |
CCT | 6759 96% | 6210 105% | 6181 105% | 7703 84% | 6538 99% | 6158 106% | 6545 99% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 61.1 | 72.3 | 65.9 | ||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 94.9 | 94.8 | 96.6 | ||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -16% /
-14% | 881% /
1574% | -21% /
-28% | -18% /
-12% | -30% /
-42% | -15% /
-26% |
* ... smaller is better
我们用专业的CalMAN软件和X-Rite i1 Pro 2分光光度计进行的分析证实,ThinkPad在出厂状态下的表现非常好。没有明显的着色,与sRGB参考色彩空间相比,色彩偏差都在3以下的目标范围内。
校准后(上面有免费下载的配置文件),性能提高了一点,但对肉眼来说没有区别,所以绝对不需要额外的校准。该面板完全覆盖了小的sRGB色彩空间,这就是为什么在这里编辑图像/视频也是可以没有问题的。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
22.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.2 ms rise | |
↘ 13.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.2 ms rise | |
↘ 22.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
IPS面板的视角稳定性没有任何批评之处。屏幕的哑光表面在户外也有效果,因为即使在明亮的环境中也没有反射的问题。直射光使舒适地观看内容变得有些困难,但你应该能够在任何情况下找到一个合适的位置。在这里,反射式显示器显然处于不利地位,即使它们主观上提供了更好的图像质量。
性能。联想部署Alder Lake P与vPro
测试条件
与联想的消费类笔记本电脑相比,ThinkPad的Vantage应用已经有一段时间没有提供自己的性能配置文件了。相反,这些都集成在正常的Windows设置中,这使用户(也包括我们)更容易,因为在这里你不需要测试无数的组合。为了进行基准测试和测量,我们使用了Windows的最佳性能模式。
处理器。酷睿i7-1270P
联想为我们的评测设备配备了新的酷睿i7-1270P它来自目前的阿尔德湖P一代,具有4个性能核心和8个效率核心的混合架构。与普通的 酷睿i7-1260P1270P提供完全的vPro支持和100MHz的时钟速度(性能核心最高4.8GHz;效率核心最高3.5GHz)。联想将短期TDP限制设定为64瓦(这也相当于P型CPU的最大值),但这个数值只在零点几秒内达到。此后,该值显著下降,并迅速稳定在28瓦左右,这也对应于 前者.
Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load
在基准测试中,这意味着名义上更快的酷睿i7-1270P在联想9i 14 ,明显落后于1260P,因为那里的TDP数值更高。单核性能也比预期的要低一些:虽然我们观察到Yoga 9i 14的单核消耗约为26瓦,但这里 "只有 "约21-22瓦。与旧的虎湖CPU相比,由于核心数量更多,多核性能明显更好,但在单核性能方面,与X1 Yoga G6 ,采用Core i7-1165G7 ,优势可以忽略不计,只有3%。目前还没有配备AMD CPU的高端敞篷车,特别是在商务类。
对于移动敞篷车来说,其性能完全够用,但你可以为ThinkPad X1 Yoga G6的所谓更快的CPU节省额外开支。正如我们在后面的压力测试中看到的那样,处理器的功耗在大约20分钟后被进一步限制在18瓦左右。在电池模式下,功耗被限制在最大36瓦,但这个数值在几秒钟后也下降到28瓦。这对单核性能没有影响,但在多核测试中,赤字约为15-20%。更多CPU基准测试可在我们的技术部分.
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Average of class Convertible | |
Average Intel Core i7-1270P | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 -2! | |
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G6-20Y0S00200 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Average of class Convertible (616 - 18070, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1270P (8426 - 11010, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G6-20Y0S00200 | |
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Average Intel Core i7-1270P (1552 - 1688, n=2) | |
Average of class Convertible (308 - 1970, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G6-20Y0S00200 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Average of class Convertible (242 - 6954, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1270P (3167 - 3905, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G6-20Y0S00200 | |
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Average of class Convertible (149.8 - 755, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1270P (595 - 627, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G6-20Y0S00200 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Average Intel Core i7-1270P (1695 - 1783, n=2) | |
Average of class Convertible (110.1 - 2889, n=65, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G6-20Y0S00200 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Average of class Convertible (68.6 - 287, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1270P (226 - 233, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G6-20Y0S00200 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G6-20Y0S00200 | |
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1270P (372 - 375, n=2) | |
Average of class Convertible (193 - 1059, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Average of class Convertible (12977 - 72400, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1270P (38099 - 38449, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G6-20Y0S00200 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1270P (4874 - 5684, n=2) | |
Average of class Convertible (3672 - 6493, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G6-20Y0S00200 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1270P (8610 - 8710, n=2) | |
Average of class Convertible (663 - 14016, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G6-20Y0S00200 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE | |
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Average Intel Core i7-1270P (1564 - 1724, n=2) | |
Average of class Convertible (319 - 2003, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G6-20Y0S00200 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Average of class Convertible (0.73 - 20.1, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1270P (9.56 - 11.3, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G6-20Y0S00200 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Average of class Convertible (42 - 121.5, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Average Intel Core i7-1270P (47.1 - 48.6, n=2) | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max | |
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G6-20Y0S00200 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G6-20Y0S00200 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
Average Intel Core i7-1270P (0.4926 - 0.575, n=2) | |
Average of class Convertible (0.4102 - 1.013, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average of class Convertible | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G6-20Y0S00200 | |
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
Average Intel Core i7-1270P | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Convertible (468 - 25226, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G6-20Y0S00200 | |
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
Average Intel Core i7-1270P (4789 - 6722, n=2) | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Average of class Convertible (2644 - 106512, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1270P (22017 - 37567, n=2) | |
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G6-20Y0S00200 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average of class Convertible (182 - 4764, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G6-20Y0S00200 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1270P (1543 - 1853, n=2) | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average of class Convertible (10502 - 120368, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1270P (61703 - 76671, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G6-20Y0S00200 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Average of class Convertible (659 - 14835, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1270P (5059 - 5210, n=2) | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G6-20Y0S00200 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Average of class Convertible (1420 - 56839, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G6-20Y0S00200 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1270P (12876 - 17891, n=2) | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G6-20Y0S00200 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max | |
Average of class Convertible (1279 - 169089, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1270P (33137 - 39956, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average of class Convertible (61.4 - 1088, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Average Intel Core i7-1270P (553 - 579, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G6-20Y0S00200 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Convertible (254 - 13175, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G6-20Y0S00200 | |
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
Average Intel Core i7-1270P (2603 - 3521, n=2) | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G6-20Y0S00200 | |
Average of class Convertible (5136 - 53406, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1270P (21056 - 34745, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA |
系统性能
主观的性能印象非常好,这当然是由于快速的处理器和PCIe 4.0固态硬盘的作用。合成基准测试也非常好。ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7配备了Windows 11 Pro,我们在审查过程中没有遇到崩溃或挂起的问题。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Average of class Convertible (1486 - 7963, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1270P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5382 - 5647, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G6-20Y0S00200 | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G6-20Y0S00200 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Average Intel Core i7-1270P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10206 - 11224, n=2) | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max | |
Average of class Convertible (3975 - 12059, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE | |
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Average of class Convertible (2764 - 10800, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G6-20Y0S00200 | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1270P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6804 - 6805, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Average of class Convertible (811 - 12360, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1270P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6094 - 6398, n=2) | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G6-20Y0S00200 | |
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Average Intel Core i7-1270P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1585 - 1712, n=2) | |
Average of class Convertible (310 - 1912, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Average Intel Core i7-1270P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1567 - 1636, n=2) | |
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
Average of class Convertible (389 - 1790, n=59, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Average Intel Core i7-1270P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1684 - 1839, n=2) | |
Average of class Convertible (252 - 2183, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Average Intel Core i7-1270P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1365 - 1584, n=2) | |
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
Average of class Convertible (295 - 1868, n=59, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 Score | 5647 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Average of class Convertible (16353 - 108544, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G6-20Y0S00200 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1270P (39471 - 62300, n=2) | |
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G6-20Y0S00200 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE | |
Average of class Convertible (12706 - 125359, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1270P (42289 - 72572, n=2) | |
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Average of class Convertible (10177 - 117920, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G6-20Y0S00200 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1270P (43051 - 61340, n=2) | |
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Average of class Convertible (7.4 - 173, n=62, last 2 years) | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G6-20Y0S00200 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1270P (89.3 - 89.3, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
在目前的BIOS版本下,X1 Yoga G7在我们的标准化延迟测试中暴露了一些问题(网页浏览、YouTube 4K播放、CPU负载),因此不是最适合使用实时音频应用程序。在视频播放过程中还出现了一些跳帧(掉帧)。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G6-20Y0S00200 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Max | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的评测设备中安装了一块来自三星的快速PCIe 4.0固态硬盘,它在基准测试中也取得了非常好的传输率。然而,在恒定负载下,性能下降了大约一半,这需要几分钟时间。这里的问题似乎是温度问题,因为正如传感器所显示的,一旦硬盘达到70℃,性能就会被扼杀。尽管如此,这里的性能仍然很好,节流不应该起到主要作用,特别是在日常使用中。然后,这也不应该在高端设备中实际发生。PM9A1(980 Pro的OEM版本)提供512GB的容量,其中427GB在首次启动设备后可用。更多的SSD基准测试列在这里。
* ... smaller is better
Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU
ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7没有配备专用的GPU,因此所有的图形处理都由CPU的集成GPU处理。著名的版本是Iris Xe Graphics G7带有80或96个处理单元的著名版本再次被用于新的Alder Lake处理器。在评测设备中,配有 酷睿i7-1270P中,我们有更快的版本,有96个EUs,最大核心时钟为1400MHz。因此,在基准测试和游戏中的性能并不比旧的Tiger Lake CPU好。iGPU非常适用于正常的办公室使用,但在游戏时,你往往被限制在低细节/分辨率。
在播放视频时,我们注意到,与旧的Tiger Lake 芯片相比,GPU的负载有所增加。而之前的移动CPU的英特尔Xe Graphics G7的负载约为32%(旧的 UHD Graphics 620~62%),而现在我们观察到在播放4K视频时的负载为44%。目前我们只能猜测原因(可能是由于新的混合架构或iGPU的变化),但我们已经询问了英特尔,一旦有更多信息,我们将立即更新文章。
然而,在长时间的负载下,图形性能不是很稳定。3DMark压力测试(Time Spy)在74.5%时明显失败,在游戏方面,你可以看到几分钟后Witcher 3 循环(Ultra设置)的性能下降。在电池模式下,图形性能大约降低5-10%。更多的GPU基准测试可以在这里找到移动显示芯片——基准测试成绩列表 。
3DMark 11 Performance | 6995 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 20497 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5035 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1891 points | |
Help |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 98.7 | 89.7 | 23.1 | 9.92 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 88 | 56 | 20 | 11.4 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 113.4 | 83.9 | 63.7 | 57.8 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 42.6 | 23.1 | 14.5 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 50.1 | 40.6 | 36.2 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 50 | 28 | 26 | 22 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 85 | 39.4 | 30.8 | 25.5 |
F1 2021 (2021) | 100.9 | 45.4 | 36.1 | 24.6 |
Farming Simulator 22 (2021) | 91 | 40 | 28 | 26 |
排放。ThinkPad在日常使用中很少保持非常安静
噪声
两个小风扇保持不变,但在X1 Yoga G7中它们的声音总体上变得大了一些。原则上,Yoga仍然是一个非常安静的设备,但随着瑜伽9i 14和它的Alder Lake处理器,我们注意到在日常使用中风扇启动得更快,因为处理器由于高功率限制而很快达到高温,需要进行冷却。这适用于Windows的最佳性能和平衡 模式。只有在最佳省电设置下,处理器的功耗才会大量减少(最大为11瓦),而且你几乎总是有一个安静的系统在手。平衡模式的临时解决方案在这里肯定是有用的。对于新的X1 Yoga G7的用户,我们绝对建议在日常使用中稍微玩一下TDP限制,以减少快速的风扇响应。这可以通过Intel Extreme Tuning Utility工具很好地完成。在我们的设备中,我们没有注意到任何其他电子噪音,如线圈啸叫。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 22.7 / 22.7 / 27.1 dB(A) |
Load |
| 34.5 / 38.7 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 22.7 dB(A) |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1270P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1160G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G | Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1195G7, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | HP Elite Dragonfly Max Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G6-20Y0S00200 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -2% | -8% | -12% | 3% | -4% | -3% | |
off / environment * | 22.7 | 25.1 -11% | 24.1 -6% | 25 -10% | 24.9 -10% | 25.4 -12% | 24.2 -7% |
Idle Minimum * | 22.7 | 25.1 -11% | 24.1 -6% | 25 -10% | 24.9 -10% | 25.4 -12% | 24.2 -7% |
Idle Average * | 22.7 | 25.1 -11% | 24.1 -6% | 25 -10% | 24.9 -10% | 25.4 -12% | 24.2 -7% |
Idle Maximum * | 27.1 | 27.1 -0% | 30 -11% | 29 -7% | 24.9 8% | 25.4 6% | 29.9 -10% |
Load Average * | 34.5 | 32.7 5% | 39.4 -14% | 39.6 -15% | 29.7 14% | 25.4 26% | 33.7 2% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 34.5 | 32.7 5% | 39.4 -14% | 31.3 9% | 41.3 -20% | 33.7 2% | |
Load Maximum * | 38.7 | 35.8 7% | 39.4 -2% | 46.9 -21% | 31.3 19% | 41.3 -7% | 36.7 5% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
由于处理器的位置在底座的左上方,并且有一根短的热管通向中间的两个小风扇,所以在负载下的热量发展也集中在机箱的左侧区域。日常使用没有问题,但是一旦你把处理器放在额外的负载下,如玩游戏或输出视频时,皮肤直接接触铝制表面就会变得有些不舒服。打字仍然舒适,没有限制,但你肯定会注意到温暖的感觉。
在压力测试中,模式基本与纯CPU负载相同,但几分钟后,处理器的能耗开始进一步下降,20分钟后达到只有18瓦的数值。从这里开始,风扇噪音也变得更安静,这有点令人惊讶,因为前代产品仍然能够保持25瓦的稳定消耗。特别是GPU时钟在18瓦的时候波动很大,所以我们假设在未来几周/几个月会有一些BIOS更新。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.3 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.1 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.3 °C / 91.9 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-5.2 °C / -9.3 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE Intel Core i7-1270P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE Intel Core i7-1160G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | HP Elite Dragonfly Max Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G6-20Y0S00200 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -3% | -8% | 3% | -11% | -5% | 0% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 43.3 | 46.5 -7% | 47.5 -10% | 38.7 11% | 39.4 9% | 43.4 -0% | 44.1 -2% |
Maximum Bottom * | 45.1 | 45.2 -0% | 52.2 -16% | 45.3 -0% | 50 -11% | 48 -6% | 47.3 -5% |
Idle Upper Side * | 26.5 | 27.3 -3% | 27.1 -2% | 25.9 2% | 31.6 -19% | 29.8 -12% | 25.5 4% |
Idle Bottom * | 27.6 | 27.7 -0% | 28.5 -3% | 28 -1% | 33.4 -21% | 28 -1% | 26.6 4% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
扬声器系统同样由四个模块组成。除了基本单元前面的两个低音炮外,两个高音炮也位于键盘旁边,将声音直接指向用户(至少在设备作为笔记本电脑正常使用时)。然而,只要你在平板电脑或演示模式下使用该设备,声音就会向后远离用户,或者高音扬声器被覆盖,这取决于平板电脑的握持方式。联想已经在以下产品中较好地解决了这个问题瑜伽9i 14扬声器位于中央显示屏铰链中。
尽管如此,音质仍然非常好,特别是对于过去经常配备不良扬声器的商务设备来说。通过预装的杜比软件,声音有了明显的改善,除了各种预设的配置文件外,还可以根据自己的需要调整声音。
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理。ThinkPad具有相当的耐力
消耗功率
我们的测量结果显示,全亮度下的空闲功耗略有下降,但该面板的亮度并不像它的前辈那样高。 前代产品 也是如此。我们在很短的时间内测得最大63.5瓦,但与处理器的功耗相类似,该值迅速下降到46瓦左右,后来甚至进一步下降到33-34瓦左右。因此,附带的紧凑型65瓦电源是完全足够的。待机模式和关机时的数值也是可以接受的。
Off / Standby | 0.27 / 0.73 Watt |
Idle | 4.2 / 6.9 / 7.6 Watt |
Load |
36.2 / 63.5 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE i7-1270P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 3840x2400, 14" | Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 1900x1200, 14" | HP Elite Dragonfly Max i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G6-20Y0S00200 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Average of class Convertible | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 5% | -49% | 9% | -3% | -15% | -1% | -25% | -24% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.2 | 3.9 7% | 7.1 -69% | 3.2 24% | 2.9 31% | 4.6 -10% | 3.3 21% | 5.34 ? -27% | 5.21 ? -24% |
Idle Average * | 6.9 | 7.3 -6% | 10 -45% | 6.3 9% | 9.9 -43% | 7.8 -13% | 5.8 16% | 8.55 ? -24% | 8.16 ? -18% |
Idle Maximum * | 7.6 | 10.3 -36% | 10.8 -42% | 7.5 1% | 10.4 -37% | 8.2 -8% | 9.6 -26% | 10.8 ? -42% | 11.1 ? -46% |
Load Average * | 36.2 | 30.6 15% | 64 -77% | 35 3% | 37.1 -2% | 47.9 -32% | 47.2 -30% | 45.3 ? -25% | 46.2 ? -28% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 43.2 | 25.5 41% | 47.7 -10% | 35.4 18% | 31.5 27% | 38.8 10% | 35.6 18% | ||
Load Maximum * | 63.5 | 57.1 10% | 97 -53% | 63 1% | 58.8 7% | 87.1 -37% | 65.3 -3% | 67.5 ? -6% | 67 ? -6% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test
Power Consumption with an external monitor
电池寿命
尽管功耗值相当,但57Wh电池的运行时间却比前代产品的运行时间要差。前者。正如评论中前面提到的,在视频播放过程中,GPU的负载更高。在我们的Wi-Fi测试中,也出现了反复的短时负载峰值,因此,明显更高的TDP限制应该导致总体上更高的消耗。在Wi-Fi测试中,我们确定在150cd/m²亮度下的运行时间略低于9小时(相当于我们评测设备中71%的亮度),在最大亮度下为7.5小时。在150cd/m²的情况下,视频播放可以达到12小时以上。
在设备开启的情况下,整个充电过程需要两个小时多一点的时间。然而,在大约40分钟后,60%的电池容量可以使用。
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE i7-1270P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 44.5 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 75 Wh | Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 63 Wh | HP Elite Dragonfly Max i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 56 Wh | Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G6-20Y0S00200 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 57 Wh | Average of class Convertible | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -1% | -1% | 32% | 47% | 37% | 26% | 10% | |
H.264 | 733 | 685 -7% | 758 3% | 924 26% | 773 ? 5% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 535 | 506 -5% | 517 -3% | 705 32% | 659 23% | 699 31% | 717 34% | 594 ? 11% |
Load | 102 | 112 10% | 98 -4% | 174 71% | 146 43% | 119 17% | 114.9 ? 13% | |
Reader / Idle | 1723 | 1721 | 1344 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论:X1 Yoga G7仍有一些问题
ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7使用了以前型号中已知的机箱和显示屏变体,而两个新功能是1080p网络摄像头和英特尔的新Alder Lake P处理器。同时,联想表示,冷却系统已经得到改进,现在通过键盘吸入新鲜空气。然而,根据我们的测量,我们无法看到任何改进,并且 前辈 在综合负载下,它的功率甚至更大。
在ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7的情况下,采用了新的 酷睿i7-1270P的实施基本上是不成功的。联想只使用了Windows的电源设置,这无疑给用户带来了方便,但他们在这里应该提供更多的种类。在最佳性能 和平衡 模式下的性能是相同的,由于在短暂的峰值负载期间的高TDP限制,两个风扇在日常使用中比前代产品更频繁地启动。只有在最佳节能模式下,它才会变得明显安静,但性能在这里却大幅下降。三星的PCIe 4.0固态硬盘实际上非常快,几分钟后也出现了温度问题,不得不降低其性能。
总的来说,性能产量相当平庸,酷睿i7-1270P的附加费用不能用其性能来证明。只有完整的vPro功能仍然可以证明附加费用的合理性。由于核心数量增加,多核性能明显提高,但与之前的Tiger Lake 芯片相比,单核性能没有改善。
新款联想ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7的价格已经明显提高,新的Alder Lake移动处理器的实现并不具有真正的说服力。
新机型还带有明显的价格溢价,并非所有部件都能证明其合理性。这当然包括键盘,近年来它的质量略有下降,以至于ThinkPad键盘以前的质量优势现在不复存在。哑光触摸屏的亮度也没有达到给定的规格,图像质量根本没有高质量的OLED或4K屏幕那么好。当然,哑光面板有优势(特别是在户外),但考虑到价格,人们当然期望更多。
总而言之,第七代ThinkPad X1 Yoga仍然是一款非常好的商务敞篷车。但鉴于竞争激烈,越来越难以证明其高价的合理性。
ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7是我们能够评测的第一款配备新一代处理器的商务敞篷车。目前最大的竞争对手来自联想本身,因为 瑜伽9i 14给人留下了更好的整体印象,而且价格也明显便宜,为2000欧元。瑜伽的键盘略显逊色,而且没有WWAN模块,但瑜伽9i 14在性能方面有明显的优势,尤其是显示屏,它甚至可以选择配备vPro CPU。
价格和可用性
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE
- 05/13/2022 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff